Health for All: Can it be financed?
description
Transcript of Health for All: Can it be financed?
Financing Health and Social Protection in Latin America and the Caribbean:
Organization, Financing and Sustainability of Social Health Insurance Systems in LAC
Daniel Titelman
Health for All: Can it be financed?“Fiscal Space and the Financing of Universal Health Care
Systems in the Americas: Issues and Policies”PAHO/WHO, IDB, RES
29 - 30 November 2007, Washington DC
Outline
• Health subsystems integration and financing sources
• Perspectives of increase contributory financing
• Non contributive expenditure
• A necessary discussion on tax burden and public expenditure efficiency
Health sector is characterized by
Segmentation between the public, social-security and private systems:• Different sources of financing• Inefficiency, duplications, waste of resource• Different social contracts and a differentiated perception of
health rights, all of which goes against social cohesion: diverse basic packages, contributive and non contributive rights.
• Weak public-private coordination in the provision leads to wrong use of the overall installed capacity
Moving towards universalization requires more subsystem integration: different experiences in the region
Latin America: Total public health expenditure by source, 2004(Percentages)
Source: Core Health Indicators, WHO, 2007
85.8 83.877.2
73.766.7
62.6 60.8 58.3 58.052.1 50.6 50.1
43.2 40.434.7 32.7
9.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cuba
Brazil
Haiti
Hondu
ras
Domini
can
Rep.
Venez
uela
Nicara
gua
Chile
Parag
uay
Ecuad
or
El Sal
vado
r
Urugu
ayPer
u
Gua
tem
ala
Panam
a
Argen
tina
Colom
bia
Bolivi
a
Mex
ico
Costa
Rica
Public expenditure Social security
Different ways of integrating subsystems depends on history and fiscal stand
Type 1 Public financing expenditure is basically non contributive: Brazil, Cuba and English Caribbean
Type 2 Different explicit ways of integrationon between public and social security: Costa Rica, Chile, Colombia, R. Dom.
Type 3
Systems with low articulation between public and social securitu: Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Latin America: Total health expenditure by source, 2004(Percentages)
Source: Core Health Indicators, WHO, 2007
66.960.7
54.9 54.147.1 47.0 46.9 46.4 45.3 44.4 43.5 42.0 41.0 40.7 38.5
33.7 31.6
77.0
86.0
87.8
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Cuba
Colom
bia
Costa
Rica
Panam
a
Bolivia
Hondu
ras
Brazil
Nicara
gua
Chile
Peru
Mex
ico
Argen
tina
El Salv
ador
Urugu
ay
Venez
uela
Guate
mala
Ecuad
orHai
ti
Parag
uay
Domin
ican
R.
General government Out-of-pocketPrivate prepaid plans Other private
Outline
• Health subsystems integration and financing sources
• Perspectives of increase contributory financing
• Non contributive expenditure
• A necessary discussion on tax burden and public expenditure efficiency
Latin America and the Caribbean: Social security coverage, total employed population
(Percentage paying contributions, ca. 2004)
Nationala Total-urban areas Total-rural areasa
Argentina (2005) … 44.2 …Bolivia (2004) 14.5 19.2 4.6Brazil (2005) 47.8 56.1 17.4Chile (2003) 64.9 67.0 48.8Costa Rica (2005) 65.3 67.7 60.5Ecuador (2005) … 32.2 …El Salvador (2004) 32.9 38.4 14.5Guatemala (2004) 17.8 28.0 8.5Mexico (2005) 55.1 60.1 30.8Nicaragua (2001) 18.3 25.1 7.6Panama (2005) 53.8 57.7 29.3Paraguay (2005) 13.5 20.6 5.0Peru (2003) 13.0 20.1 2.6Dominican R. (2005) 44.7 34.7 32.7Uruguay (2005) … 62.1 …Venezuela (2005) 61.5 60.5 …Simple average 38.7 43.4 21.9
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)a Figures from previous round of household surveys.
Latin America and the Caribbean: Social security coverage, only urban wage-based
(Percentage paying contributions, ca. 2004)
Total Formal sector Informal sector With contract Without contract
Argentina (2005) 62.5 74.4 23.0 71.6 12.5
Bolivia (2004) 28.3 45.8 4.5 65.8 8.9
Brazil (2005) 71.5 76.2 35.3 100.0 33.4
Chile (2003) 82.9 88.5 54.7 96.4 32.0
Costa Rica (2005) 80.4 90.4 40.4 … …
Ecuador (2005) 46.4 60.8 14.8 76.8 16.0
El Salvador (2004) 58.9 78.2 6.8 92.4 47.1
Guatemala (2004) 48.7 66.0 7.6 79.6 27.1
Mexico (2005) 62.5 76.2 20.1 84.1 23.8
Nicaragua (2001) 41.0 58.4 6.4 … …
Panama (2005) 76.3 86.3 25.9 87.7 14.9
Paraguay (2005) 32.3 52.1 4.1 65.9 4.5
Peru (2003) 35.2 38.5 2.4 … …
Dominican R. (2005) 58.7 70.0 7.2 85.5 42.8
Uruguay (2005) 77.3 88.9 44.9 … …
Venezuela (2005) 61.7 73.4 15.8 … …Simple average 57.8 70.3 19.6 82.3 23.9
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Latin America and the Caribbean: Employed persons’ social security contributions, by household income quintile (ca. 2002)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q5/Q1
Argentina (2002, urban) 15.2 38.3 57.7 66.4 76.1 5.0
Bolivia (2002) 3.2 6.3 10.3 16.2 30.3 9.5
Brazil (2001) 20.1 36.1 47.2 55.6 63.5 3.2
Chile (2003) 50.3 60.0 64.5 68.1 71.4 1.4
Costa Rica (2002) 49.6 58.2 63.7 66.2 75.1 1.5
Ecuador (2002, urbana) 11.1 18.8 25.1 33.7 54.5 4.9
El Salvador (2001) 11.5 16.8 29.5 36.1 52.9 4.6
Guatemala (2002) 4.7 15.0 17.1 23.3 24.0 5.1
Mexico (2002) 28.9 46.9 51.8 64.2 73.4 2.5
Nicaragua (2001) 6.4 12.0 13.5 23.5 26.9 4.2
Panama (2002) 22.3 42.7 54.8 61.0 67.0 3.0
Paraguay (2000) 3.1 5.7 11.2 17.2 22.7 7.3
Peru (2001) 2.0 5.7 10.1 15.7 24.9 12.5
Dominican Rep. (2002) 34.9 40.7 37.5 47.6 51.6 1.5
Uruguay (2002, urbana) 25.6 48.1 62.7 75.9 85.3 3.3
Venezuela (2002) 36.9 51.9 59.7 68.1 78.9 2.1
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Latin America and the Caribbean: Social security contributors
(Percentage of the working-age population, by age and sex)
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Outline
• Health subsystems integration and financing sources
• Perspectives of increase contributory financing
• Non contributive expenditure
• A necessary discussion on tax burden and public expenditure efficiency
LAC (21 countries): Public social spending, as a percentage of GDP, 1990-1991 to 2004-2005
5,66,36,37,1
7,98,08,99,49,910,2
13,113,4
17,517,718,6
19,4
22,0
28,7
10,811,7 11,6
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Cub
a
Bra
zil
Arg
entin
a
Bol
ivia
Uru
guay
Cos
ta R
ica
Col
ombi
a
Chi
le
Ven
ezue
la
Hon
dura
s
Nic
arag
ua
Mex
ico
Jam
aica
Trin
idad
and
Tab
ago
Per
u
Pan
ama
Par
agua
y
Dom
inic
an R
ep.
Gua
tem
ala
Ecu
ador
El S
alva
dor
1990-1991 2000-2001 2002-2003 2004-2005
Regional average2004-2005: 15,9%2002-2003: 15,8%2000-2001: 15,7%
Regional average 1990-1991: 12,8%
Source: ECLAC, on the basis of information from the Commission’s social expenditure database.
Latin America and the Caribbean (21 countries): Public social expenditure as a percentage of GDP, by sectors,
1990-1991 to 2004-2005a
Source: ECLAC, on the basis of information from the Commission’s social expenditure database.a Weighted average of countries, not including Nicaragua.b The information available is such that the two headings cannot be separated. According to national studies, social security represents around 78% of the resources under this double heading.
Latin America (18 countries): Redistributive impact of public social spending on income, by primary income quintiles,
1997-2004a
(Percentages)
Source: ECLAC, on the basis of national studies.a Weighted average according to the significance of each spending item in each country’s primary income.
49%70%
78%84%
91%
51%
30%
22%
16%
9%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Quintile I Quintile II Quintile III Quintile IV Quintile V
Per
cent
ages
Social spending
Primary income
(Total income of quintile V = 100)
Latin America (18 countries): Composition of spending, by primary income distribution quintiles, 1997-2004a
(Percentages)
7.4 6.5 6.3 5.9 5.8
5.14.7 4.2 4.0 3.7
2.0 2.8 4.3 6.3
16.5
0.8 0.9 1.11.4
0.9
3.3 2.1 1.61.3
1.1
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
Quintile I Quintile II Quintile III Quintile IV Quintile V
Per
cent
ages
Education Health Social security Housing Social assistance
(Total social spending = 100)
Source: ECLAC, on the basis of national studies.a Weighted average according to the significance of each spending item in each country’s primary income.
Outline
• Health subsystems integration and financing sources
• Perspectives of increase contributory financing
• Non contributive expenditure
• A necessary discussion on tax burden and public expenditure efficiency
Social security as a share of tax revenues, 1990 and 2006
(Percentages)
0
10
20
30
40
50
Argen
tina
Bolivia
Brazil
Chile
Colom
bia
Costa
Rica
Ecuad
or
El Salv
ador
Guate
mala
Hondu
ras
Mex
ico
Nicara
gua
Panam
a
Parag
uay
Peru
Domin
ican
R.
Urugu
ay
Venez
uela
1990 1998 2006
REGIONAL AVERAGE 1998: 16,3%
REGIONAL AVERAGE 2006: 15,7%REGIONAL AVERAGE 1990:
16,2%
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Per capita GDP and tax revenues as a share of GDP, 2003
(2000 dollars)
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Latin America and the Caribbean: The tax burden, 1990-2006
(Percentages of GDP)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Argen
tina
Bolivi
a
Brazil
Chile
Colom
bia
Costa
Rica
Ecuad
or
El Sal
vado
r
Gua
tem
ala
Haiti
Hondu
ras
Mex
ico
Nicara
gua
Panam
a
Parag
uayPer
u
Domin
ican
R.
Urugu
ay
Venez
uela
1990 1998 2006
REGIONAL AVERAGE 1998: 15,7%
REGIONAL AVERAGE 2006: 18,3%
REGIONAL AVERAGE 1990: 12,4%
Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC)
Financing Health and Social Protection in Latin America and the Caribbean:
Organization, Financing and Sustainability of Social Health Insurance Systems in LAC
Daniel Titelman
Health for All: Can it be financed?“Fiscal Space and the Financing of Universal Health Care
Systems in the Americas: Issues and Policies”PAHO/WHO, IDB, RES
29 - 30 November 2007, Washington DC