Health and Human Services: chapter10

8/14/2019 Health and Human Services: chapter10

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/health-and-human-services-chapter10 1/104

2001 TANF Annual Report to Congress Characteristics and Financial Circumstances

of TANF Recipients

X-1

X. CHARACTERISTICS AND FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

OF TANF RECIPIENTS

This chapter reports on the demographic characteristics and financial circumstances of familieswho received cash assistance and families who discontinued receiving assistance under theTemporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program during the period of October 1999 – September 2000. It also includes the characteristics data of the Separate State Program – Maintenance of Effort (SSP-MOE) recipient families. This chapter is available on the Internet athttp://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/particip/index.htm#characteristics.

It is important to note that States are now spending considerable proportions of their TANF

funds on various services to families who are not receiving cash assistance -- particularly thosewho have left or avoided cash welfare for work. These data are limited to those who receivedcash assistance at sometime during the observation period.

The data referenced by this document were obtained from a statistically valid sample of TANFand SSP-MOE cases within the national TANF/SSP-MOE Database. Data are presented for allStates, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA)established a new TANF program to replace the Aid to Families with Dependent Children(AFDC) program. The new welfare law also established State data reporting requirements for

the TANF program. The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued finalregulations implementing data reporting and other aspects of PRWORA in April 1999.

The TANF statute requires States to collect TANF data on a monthly basis and report them toDHHS on a quarterly basis. These data include disaggregated case record information on thefamilies receiving assistance, families no longer receiving assistance, and families newly-approved for assistance from programs funded with TANF funds. Effective with the October-December 1999 quarter, all States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the VirginIslands were required to implement the quarterly reporting requirements in the final TANF rules.The 54 States and Territories transmitted data on 8,391,790 active cases and 649,794 closedcases to the national TANF database for fiscal year (FY) 2000. Oregon transmitted its closed

cases after preparing this report.

In Appendix 10:1 there are SSP-MOE recipient characteristics for 23 States who reported data ontheir SSP-MOE families. SSP-MOE eligible families may be quite different among the 23 Statesas well as within a State where there are multiple SSP-MOE programs. For example, a Statemay have a two-parent SSP-MOE cash assistance program as well as an SSP-MOE program that provides transportation assistance to other families. Multiple SSP-MOE programs are reportedas a single combined program. About 60 percent of the States reported serving multiple types of

http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/indexpub.htm





X-2 Characteristics and Financial Circumstances

of TANF Recipients

2001 TANF Annual Report to Congress

families. It is for these reasons that it is not possible at the national level to comparecharacteristics of SSP-MOE recipients with those of TANF recipients.

Under the TANF data reporting system, States have the option to submit either sample data or universe data to DHHS. Thirty States submitted universe data, from which DHHS randomlyselected approximately 275 active cases and 100 closed cases for each State each month to prepare this report. The remaining 24 States submitted sample data. A total sample of 198,415active cases and 54,340 closed cases was used to compile 54 tables for TANF recipientcharacteristics. The statistical data in this report are estimates derived from samples and,therefore, are subject to sampling errors as well as non-sampling errors. Statistical specificationscan be found in Appendix 10:2, the reliability of estimates.

Implementation of the final rules of TANF/SSP-MOE data collection requirements posedsignificant initial challenges to States and DHHS. In cases where a few States submittedquestionable data, the data from those States were eliminated from the tables. In cases wherenumerous States reported questionable data or unusually large numbers of “unknown” or “other”categories, DHHS urges caution in drawing conclusions on the basis of the data.

Summary

This summary describes TANF recipient characteristics in October 1999 - September 2000.Wherever possible, the recipient characteristics were compared with those in the preceding year,October 1998 - September 1999. As presented in Exhibit I, separate characteristics data are presented for active cases, newly-approved cases, child-only cases, and closed cases for October 1999 - September 2000. In Appendix 10.1 there are SSP-MOE recipient characteristics for 23States who reported characteristics data on their SSP-MOE families. Because SSP-MOE eligiblefamilies may be quite different among these 23 States, it was not possible on a national level to

compare characteristics of SSP-MOE recipients with those of TANF recipients.

The TANF Family

The average monthly number of TANF families was 2,269,000 in FY 2000. The estimated totalnumber of TANF recipients was 1,579,000 adults and 4,385,000 children. The average monthlynumber of TANF families decreased in almost all States and reflects an overall 14 percent decreasefrom 2,648,000 families in October 1998 - September 1999.

California had the largest number of TANF families with a monthly average of 501,000, whichaccounted for almost a quarter of the U.S. total TANF families. New York ranked second with a

monthly average of 258,000. California and New York had a combined monthly average of 759,000, accounting for a third of the U.S. totals. Of the $9.5 billion paid to TANF eligible familiesin cash assistance during FY 2000, California alone paid $2.9 billion, which accounted for 30 percent of the U.S. total cash payments. New York made total cash payments of $1.4 billion. Thecombined TANF cash payments of California and New York accounted for almost a half of the U.S.total TANF cash payments.




of TANF Recipients

X-3

The average number of persons in TANF families was 2.6 persons. The TANF families averagedtwo recipient children. Two in five families had only one child. One in ten families had more thanthree children. The average number of children in closed-case families was only 1.8. Nearly one intwo closed-case families had one child, and seven percent had more than three children.

Sixty percent of TANF families had only one adult recipient, and four percent included two or moreadult recipients. In 17 States and two Territories, there were no two-parent family cases to be usedin calculating the work participation rate. These States placed two-parent families under SeparateState Programs. About 35 percent of TANF families had no adult recipients, up about 5.4 percentage points when compared to the October 1998 - September 1999 period. Although the percentage of child-only cases on the welfare rolls has continued to increase in the past severalyears, the total number of child-only cases has actually declined by about 200,000 since FY 1996.

Nearly half of child-only families had a parent in the household. Of those child-only families with a parent present, about 42 percent had a parent on SSI and 26 percent had a parent in unknowncitizenship/alienage status. Only 11 percent had a parent in sanction status because of refusing tocomply with work requirements, not attending school, or not cooperating with child support. Thereasons were unknown for the remaining 21 percent that had a parent not in the assistance unit.

There was little change in the racial composition of TANF families. African American familiescomprised 39 percent of TANF families. White families comprised 31 percent of the families and25 percent were Hispanic. Of TANF families, 1.6 percent were Native American, and 2.2 percentwere Asian. Of all newly-approved families, 39 percent were African American families, 37 percent were white families, and 20 percent were Hispanics. Of all closed-case families, 36 percentwere African American families, 38 percent were white families, and 21 percent were Hispanics.

Of TANF families, 80 percent received food stamp assistance, which is consistent with previouslevels. Those families received an average monthly food stamp assistance of $224. Of closed-case

families, about 71 percent received food stamp assistance in the month of closure.

Almost every TANF family was eligible to receive medical assistance under the State plan approvedunder title XIX of the Social Security Act.

The proportion of families that received a reduction in assistance for the reporting month was 23.6 percent distributed as follows: sanction (6.1 percent); recoupment of a prior overpayment (8.7 percent); and other (8.8 percent). Over 50 percent of sanctions were due to a failure to comply withwork requirements. “Other” could include reasons for a reduction in assistance, such as length of time on assistance or the application of a family cap.

The reasons for TANF families no longer receiving assistance were employment at 19.7 percent,State’s policy at 12.1 percent, family served by a Tribal program at 10.5 percent, failure tocooperate with eligibility requirements at 22.2 percent, sanction at 6.5 percent, and voluntaryclosure at 2.3 percent. However, understanding the reasons for case closure is limited, in that Statesreported 26.4 percent of all cases closed due to “other” unspecified reasons. For example, whileindependent studies of the reason for families leaving welfare typically find that somewhat over half leave as a result of employment, States reported only 19.7 percent of cases closing due toemployment, clearly an understatement of the true rate. Many closures due to employment are




of TANF Recipients


coded as failure to cooperate or as some other category because at the point of closure the agencyoften is unaware that the client became employed.

The TANF Adults

Most TANF adult recipients were women. Men represented ten percent of adult recipients. Theaverage age of TANF adult recipients was 31.3 years. Of TANF adult recipients, seven percentwere teenagers and 18 percent were 40 years of age or older. Nearly 93 percent of adultrecipients were the head of the household. There were about 138,000 teen parents whose childwas also a member of the TANF family. In other words, 14 percent of teen recipients were teen parents. Only 12 percent of adult recipients were married and living together. This does notinclude those families that receive benefits under a separate State TANF program.

African American adults comprised 38 percent of adult recipients. White adults comprised 33 percent of adult recipients and 24 percent were Hispanic. Of adult recipients, 1.8 percent wereAmerican Indian or Alaska Native, and 2.6 percent were Asian.

There were about 700,000 non-recipient adults in child-only cases. Of all non-recipient adultsliving in the child-only case household, 55 percent were parents, 38 percent were caretakers andseven percent were other persons. Of such non-recipient adults who may not be eligible to receiveassistance, 30 percent received SSI benefits, 21 percent were in unknown citizenship/alienageincluding undocumented or non-qualified aliens, and only seven percent were in sanction status. In42 percent, the reason that the adult was not included in the assistance unit was unknown.

Most TANF adult recipients were U.S. citizens. Non-citizens residing legally in this country wereeight percent of TANF adults. Half of TANF adult recipients completed a formal education of 12years or more. About 20 percent of adult recipients had less than ten years of education.

Of TANF adult recipients, 26.4 percent were employed. There was little difference in theemployment rate between male recipients and female recipients. Employment slightly decreased byabout four percent when compared with 27.6 percent in FY 1999. Half of TANF adult recipientswere in the labor force, i.e., seeking work but not employed, and a quarter of adult recipients werenot in the labor force. On the other hand in newly-approved families, 19.7 percent of adultrecipients were employed. In closed-case families, 37.9 percent were employed.

Work participation was mandatory for almost three of every five adult recipients. Of TANF adultrecipients, about seven percent were exempt from the work participation because they were singlecustodial parents with a child under 12 months. Nearly 11 percent were exempt because of asanction, part of an ongoing research evaluation or an approved welfare reform waiver. Ten percent

were exempted by the State from the work participation status because of a good cause exception,e.g., disabled, in poor health, or other. About eight percent were exempt teen parents who wererequired to participate in education.

Overall, 45 percent of all TANF adult recipients participated in some type of work activities duringthe reporting month. In other words, 26 percent worked in unsubsidized jobs, five percent did jobsearch, and another 14 percent were engaged in subsidized employment, job skills training or work preparation activities. (Some TANF adults did two or three work activities. Also, some adults




of TANF Recipients

X-5

participated who were work exempt.) Their average number of hours per week participating inwork activities was 25 hours.

In addition to 37 percent who were exempt from work participation, it appears that at least 20 percent of adult recipients who were required to participate did not participate in mandatory work activities.

The TANF Children

TANF recipient children averaged about 7.8 years of age. Thirteen percent of recipient childrenwere under two years of age, while 39 percent were of preschool age under 6. Only eight percent of the children were 16 years of age or older.

Most recipient children were children of the head of the household in TANF families, and onlyeight percent were grandchildren of the head of the household. Of all TANF recipient children inchild-only cases, 62 percent lived with parents and 23 percent with grandparents who did notthemselves receive assistance.

The racial distribution of TANF recipient children was slightly changed in recent years. AfricanAmerican children continued to be the largest group of welfare children, comprising about 40 percent of recipient children. About 27 percent of TANF recipient children were white and about27 percent were Hispanic. The percentage of African American children on TANF remainsunchanged. The percentages of white and Hispanic children are up 1.0 percentage point, however,when compared to October 1998 – September 1999.

Financial Circumstances

Of TANF families, 98 percent received cash and cash equivalent assistance, with the average

monthly amount of $349 under the State’s TANF program. The monthly cash payment to theTANF families averaged $285 for one child, $356 for two children, $423 for three children and$516 for four children or more. Some TANF families who were not employed received other forms of assistance such as child care, transportation, and other supportive services.

One in every four TANF families had non-TANF income. The average monthly amount of non-TANF income was $580 per family. Sixteen percent of TANF families had earned income withthe average monthly amount of $675. Eight percent of TANF families had unearned income,with the average monthly amount of $277. Similarly, 22 percent of newly-approved families hadnon-TANF income with the average monthly amount of $478. Of all closed-case families, 40 percent had non-TANF income, with the average monthly amount of $830.

A quarter of TANF recipient adults had earned income. Their average monthly earned incomeincreased to $668 from $598 in FY 1999, an increase of about 12 percent. Six percent of adultrecipients had unearned income averaging about $291 per month. Three percent of recipientchildren had unearned income, averaging about $166 per month.

Ten percent of TANF families received child support, averaging about $174 per month. One in tenTANF families had some cash resources (e.g., cash on hand, bank accounts, or certificates of




of TANF Recipients


deposit) averaging about $252 per month. Such family’s cash resources were defined by the State

for determining eligibility for and/or amount of benefits.

NOTE: The work participation activity data may be somewhat different from those presented in "Section III -Work Participation Rates," because TANF recipient characteristics in this section were prepared using (1) samplecases of 3,300 randomly selected for States who submitted the universe data, and (2) the data transmitted by Statesas of May 23, 2001.




of TANF Recipients

X-7

TOTAL ACTIVE

FAMILIES

NEWLY-APPROVED

FAMILIES

CHILD-ONLY

FAMILIES

CLOSED-CASE

FAMILIES

Monthly Average 2,269,000 147,000 782,000 169,500

Child-Only Cases 782,000 31,500 -- 42,900

Percent 34.5 21.4 -- 25.3

1.0 20.3 17.1 -- 22.8

2.0 34.0 38.5 -- 34.5

3.0 23.2 24.1 -- 22.7

4 Or More 22.4 20.3 -- 20.0

Average 2.6 2.6 -- 2.5

1.0 44.2 47.4 53.7 47.8

2.0 28.4 27.2 26.9 25.7

3.0 15.3 12.9 12.0 12.2

4 Or More 10.1 7.6 7.1 6.7

Unknown 2.0 4.9 0.3 7.6

Average 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8

Medical 98.8 98.5 98.0 95.8

Food Stamps 79.9 79.6 62.6 70.4

Subsidized Housing 17.7 14.3 12.8 12.4

White 31.2 36.7 29.5 37.5

Black 38.6 38.9 37.8 36.0

Hispanic* 25.0 19.9 27.7 21.3

Asian 2.2 0.8 1.8 1.7

American Native 1.6 2.0 1.3 1.8

Other 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.9

Unknown 0.8 0.9 1.2 0.8

Percent 98.0 96.4 96.9 --

Monthly Amount $348.93 $276.66 $308.81 --

Percent 22.7 22.1 -- 40.4

Monthly Amount $579.83 $477.91 -- $829.55

(continued…)

Ethnicity/Race (Percent Of All Families)

T e Of Assistance Received Percent Of All Families

Non-TANF Income (Percent Of All Families)

EXHIBIT I

October 1999 – September 2000

FAMILIES

TANF RECIPIENT CHARACTERISTICS

Number Of Famil Members Percent Of All Families

Number Of Recipient Children (Percent Of All Families)

TANF Cash Assistance (Percent Of All Families)




of TANF Recipients


TOTAL ACTIVE

FAMILIES

NEWLY-APPROVED

FAMILIES

CHILD-ONLY

FAMILIES

CLOSED-CASE

FAMILIES

Under 20 7.1 11.1 -- 11.0

20-29 42.5 47.6 -- 43.5

30-39 32.1 29.1 -- 30.5

Over 39 18.3 12.2 -- 15.0

Average Age 31.3 32.5 -- 30.1

Married 12.4 13.8 -- 13.7

Separated 13.1 14.9 -- 13.0

Single 65.3 61.9 -- 63.7

Widowed 0.7 0.4 -- 0.6

Divorced 8.5 9.0 -- 9.0

1 - 6 Years 3.8 2.5 -- 2.4

7 – 9 Years 12.5 11.6 -- 9.1

10 - 11 Years 30.0 28.4 -- 29.6

12 Years 47.5 48.7 -- 48.7

More Than 12 3.4 4.2 -- 3.8

No Formal 2.6 2.8 -- 3.1

Unknown 0.4 1.8 -- 3.3Employment Rate 26.4 19.7 -- 37.9

Percent 28.4 23.1 -- 45.3

Monthly Amount $620.16 $503.81 -- $827.01

(continued…)

Education Level (Percent Of All Adults)

Marital Status Percent Of All Adults

Age Distribution (Percent Of All Adults)

EXHIBIT I (cont.)



ADULTS

Non-TANF Income Percent Of All Adults




of TANF Recipients

X-9

TOTAL ACTIVE

FAMILIES

NEWLY-APPROVED

FAMILIES

CHILD-ONLY

FAMILIES

CLOSED-CASE

FAMILIES

0 – 1 13.1 20.1 8.2 16.8

2 – 5 25.6 28.6 21.8 28.5

6 – 11 36.2 31.8 38.3 33.9

12 – 15 17.4 14.4 21.5 14.5

16 – 19 7.6 5.2 10.3 6.2

Unknown 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1

Average Age 7.8 7.5 8.8 7.1

0 - 1 13.4 19.9 6.9 14.0

1 - 2 20.1 23.5 14.2 22.6

3 - 5 20.7 18.5 18.7 19.7

6 - 8 15.8 12.8 18.5 14.0

9 - 11 12.0 9.0 15.9 9.1

12 - 15 11.7 9.2 17.3 9.3

16 And Older 5.1 3.2 8.4 7.7

Unknown 1.2 3.9 0.1 3.5

White 26.8 32.2 25.9 33.8

Black 40.1 41.8 37.9 39.8Hispanic* 26.8 21.2 30.6 21.1

Asian 2.8 0.9 2.7 1.4

American Native 1.6 2.2 1.3 2.0

Other 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.9

Unknown 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.1

Percent 2.9 3.1 4.3 2.6

Monthly Amount $166.16 $152.87 $149.87 $204.85

Notes:

* = Can Be Of Any Race.

EXHIBIT I (cont.)



Columns May Not Add To 100 Percent Due To Rounding.

-- = Not A licable.

Unearned Income (Percent Of All Children)

Ethnicit /Race Percent Of All Children

Age Of Youngest (Percent Of All Families)

Age Distribution (Percent Of All Children)

CHILDREN




of TANF Recipients


AFDC/TANF Trends in the 1990’s

Because of the rapid decline in the caseload beginning from a record high of 5.0 million familiesin FY 1994 to 2.3 million families in FY 2000, the question has been raised as to whether the

current caseload has changed significantly after PRWORA. An examination of longer-termtrends is helpful in beginning to understand how the welfare client population has been changing.

A number of major changes in the characteristics of welfare recipients have occurred in the1990s including the number of child-only families, the racial composition of welfare families,the age of adult recipients, the age of the youngest child, the percent of unborn children, and theemployment rate of adults. These trends in AFDC/TANF recipient characteristics are presentedin Exhibit II.

Child-only Families

In FY 2000, there were about 782,000 child-only cases, which accounted for 35 percent of thetotal caseload. The number of child-only families increased steadily throughout the mid 1990’s,reaching a peak of 978,000 families in 1996. Through 1998 the number of child-only familiesdecreased to 743,000, although their proportion of the caseload continued to increase slowly to23 percent.

Racial/Ethnic Composition of Families

The racial composition of welfare families has changed substantially over the past ten years. InFY 1990, it was 38 percent white, 40 percent African American and 17 percent Hispanic. In FY2000, however, it was 31 percent white, 39 percent African American and 25 percent Hispanic.

Viewed over the decade there has been a shift from white to Hispanic families, which isconsistent with broader population trends. This shift has been accelerated since 1996 and is particularly pronounced in California, New York and Texas. Thus, in FY 2000, 70 percent of allHispanic welfare families were in three large States (California, New York and Texas), ascompared to 65 percent in FY 1996. In California, the proportion of Hispanic welfare familiesincreased to 45 percent in FY 2000 from 38 percent in FY 1996. In addition, the proportion of African American families has trended up slightly since FY 1996 following a decline that preceded FY 1996. The result of these changes is that over the past decade the proportion of welfare families that were minorities has increased from three-fifths to just over two-thirds, primarily driven by the relative growth in Hispanic families.

Age of Adult Recipients

Throughout the decade the average age of adults has gradually increased from 29.7 in 1990 to31.3 in 2000. Between 1990 and 2000, the proportion of older adults over 39 years increasedmost dramatically from 13 to 18 percent of adult recipients. Slightly less than half of this growthoccurred in the three years after TANF was enacted compared to the six prior years.




of TANF Recipients

X-11

Employment Rate

The employment rate of adult recipients has increased significantly in the past five years. In FY2000, 26 percent of adult recipients were employed, about 2.4 times the 1996 employment rate of 11 percent and four times the rate of the early 1990’s.

Age of the Youngest Child

Between 1990 and 2000 the proportion of families with a youngest child who was a toddler, i.e.,aged one or 2, declined sharply from 30 to 20 percent. At the same time the proportion of families whose youngest child was age six or older increased sharply from 36 to 45 percent.Furthermore, this trend was accelerated after 1996 with 63 percent of the growth over the decadeoccurring in the later three years.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the question of whether national caseloads are becoming, on average, moredisadvantaged as caseloads decline, is far less important than whether local welfare agencies areaddressing the challenges recipients are facing as well as becoming more adept at helping clientsrespond to barriers. This is clearly happening as a result of welfare reform. Indeed, the popular perception that caseloads are becoming "more disadvantaged" may likely be a product of welfareagencies examining their caseloads more closely then ever before, making considerably greater effort now to help all their cases escape dependency. This expanded appreciation of clientcharacteristics at the local level is helping agencies to design more helpful programs.




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-13

Appendices

TANF Families and Households

Table 10:1 Percent Distribution of TANF Households by Number of Persons in theHousehold

Table 10:2 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipients

Table 10:3 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Adult Recipients

Table 10:4 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:5 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with No Adult Recipients by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:6 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with One Adult Recipient by

Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:7 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Two Or More AdultRecipients by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:8 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:9 Percent Distribution of All Adults Living in the Household by the FamilyAffiliation

Table 10:10 Percent Distribution of TANF Teen Recipients with Teen Parent Status

Table 10:11 Percent Distribution TANF Child-Only Cases with Parents: Reason for Parents Living in the Household but Not in the Assistance Unit

Table 10:12 Percent Distribution of TANF Families Receiving Assistance (Medical,Food Stamps, Subsidized Housing, Subsidized Child care)

Table 10:13 Percent Distribution of TANF Families with Child Support and CashResources

Table 10:14 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Reason for Grant Reduction

Table 10:15 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by the Federal Time-Limit

Exemption Provision

Table 10:16 Percent Distribution of TANF Families by Type of Family for Work Participation

Adult Recipients

Table 10:17 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Age Group




of TANF Recipients


Table 10:18 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:19 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:20 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:21 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Marital Status

Table 10:22 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients Receiving DisabilityBenefits

Table 10:23 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Relationship to Head-of-Household

Table 10:24 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Education Level

Table 10:25 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Citizenship Status

Table 10:26 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Work ExemptionStatus

Table 10:27 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients Participating in Work Activities

Table 10:28 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by the Average Number of Hours Per Week Participating in Work Activities

Table 10:29 Percent Distribution of TANF Adult Recipients by Employment Status

Recipient Children

Table 10:30 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:31 Percent Distribution of TANF Male Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:32 Percent Distribution of TANF Female Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:33 Percent Distribution of TANF Youngest Recipient Child by Age Group

Table 10:34 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:35 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children Receiving DisabilityBenefits

Table 10:36 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Relationship toHead-of-Household

Table 10:37 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children in Child-Only Cases byRelationship to Head-of-Household




of TANF Recipients

X-15

Table 10:38 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Education Level

Table 10:39 Percent Distribution of TANF Recipient Children by Citizenship Status

Financial Circumstances

Table 10:40 TANF Families Receiving Cash Assistance and Average Monthly Amount by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:41 TANF Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

Table 10:42 TANF Adult Recipients with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

Table 10:43 TANF Recipient Children with Unearned Income

Closed Cases

Table 10:44 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Reason for Closure

Table 10:45 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Number of FamilyMembers

Table 10:46 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families by Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:47 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Families Receiving Assistance(Medical, Food Stamps, Subsidized Housing, Subsidized Child care)

Table 10:48 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by Age

Group

Table 10:49 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Recipient Children by AgeGroup

Table 10:50 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Youngest Child Recipient byAge Group

Table 10:51 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by MaritalStatus

Table 10:52 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients by EducationLevel

Table 10:53 Percent Distribution of TANF Closed-Case Adult Recipients byEmployment Status

Table 10:54 TANF Closed-Case Families with Income by Type of Non-TANF Income

Appendix 10:1 -- SSP-MOE Recipients




of TANF Recipients


Table 10:55 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of FamilyMembers

Table 10:56 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Type of Families for Work Participation

Table 10:57 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families by Number of RecipientChildren

Table 10:58 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families By Ethnicity/Race

Table 10:59 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Families Receiving Assistance(Medical, Food Stamps, Subsidized Housing, Subsidized Child care)

Table 10:60 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Age Group

Table 10:61 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Marital Status

Table 10:62 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Education Level

Table 10:63 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Work ExemptionStatus

Table 10:64 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients Participating in Work Activities

Table 10:65 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Adult Recipients by Employment Status

Table 10:66 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Recipient Children by Age Group

Table 10:67 SSP-MOE Families Receiving Cash Assistance and Average MonthlyAmount by Number of Recipient Children

Table 10:68 SSP-MOE Families with Income by Type of Non-SSP Income

Table 10:69 Percent Distribution of SSP-MOE Closed-Case Families by Reason for Closure

Appendix 10:2 -- Reliability of Estimates

Table 10:70 Average Monthly TANF Active Caseload, Sample Size, Sample Fractionand Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary from TrueValue at the 95 Percent Confidence Level

Table 10:71 Total Number of Annual TANF Closed Cases, Sample Size, SampleFraction and Percent by Which Estimate of 50 Percent Might Vary fromTrue Value at the 95 Percent Confidence Level

Table 10:72 Approximate Standard Error of Estimated Percentages of TANF Families




of TANF Recipients

X-17

Table 10:73 Significance Differences for Percentage Values between the United Statesand States with Samples of 3000

Table 10:74 Significance Differences for Percentage Values between States withSamples of 3000




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-19

AVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 OVER 10U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 3.0 9.5 35.1 26.7 16.0 7.4 5.2 0.2

ALABAMA 19,068 3.0 0.1 43.0 31.2 16.2 6.0 3.5 0.0ALASKA 7,317 3.3 0.9 35.7 30.2 16.2 8.7 8.2 0.4ARIZONA 33,722 2.6 23.3 31.7 22.2 12.7 6.3 3.8 0.0ARKANSAS 11,336 2.3 24.0 40.1 21.3 9.3 3.4 1.9 0.0CALIFORNIA 501,019 3.2 3.0 36.3 28.4 17.6 8.1 6.4 0.3COLORADO 11,154 2.6 21.9 32.5 24.4 12.4 5.5 3.3 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 2.4 24.8 38.8 20.5 9.9 3.6 2.4 0.0DELAWARE 5,814 2.3 28.3 33.4 22.4 10.4 4.0 1.6 0.0DIST. OF COL. 17,563 3.0 4.7 39.2 27.1 15.8 7.4 5.7 0.0FLORIDA 67,355 2.3 32.2 34.5 18.9 8.7 3.5 2.3 0.0

GEORGIA 53,267 2.4 27.9 33.9 20.9 9.9 4.4 3.0 0.0GUAM 2,721 3.0 45.1 8.9 10.1 11.5 9.0 14.2 2.1HAWAII 14,705 2.9 9.0 38.2 26.5 14.3 7.4 4.6 0.0IDAHO 1,275 2.8 0.6 43.7 37.7 12.6 4.1 1.3 0.0

ILLINOIS 88,493 3.0 15.1 28.3 24.1 17.4 8.8 6.2 0.2INDIANA 35,714 3.2 0.0 36.2 31.4 18.6 8.3 5.5 0.1IOWA 19,952 3.2 10.0 31.3 24.5 17.4 8.8 7.8 0.3KANSAS 12,576 2.6 21.8 33.4 24.3 12.4 5.1 3.0 0.0KENTUCKY 38,542 2.3 26.8 38.2 21.2 10.0 2.7 1.2 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 3.1 2.4 37.6 28.5 17.1 9.0 5.3 0.0

MAINE 10,864 2.6 15.1 38.9 25.7 14.0 4.6 1.8 0.0MARYLAND 27,523 2.8 20.7 29.8 22.9 13.9 7.1 5.5 0.2MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 3.0 1.2 43.5 29.0 16.2 6.9 3.2 0.1MICHIGAN 74,211 3.3 3.6 31.2 28.4 18.3 9.7 8.6 0.2MINNESOTA 39,293 3.3 2.6 36.4 26.8 16.5 8.5 8.6 0.9MISSISSIPPI 14,970 2.3 29.1 33.9 23.1 8.4 3.9 1.6 0.0MISSOURI 46,710 3.2 0.0 38.4 30.6 17.4 8.6 4.9 0.1MONTANA 4,555 2.8 14.2 35.7 24.7 14.5 6.3 4.6 0.0NEBRASKA 9,444 2.8 11.4 39.0 26.1 13.3 6.0 4.0 0.2NEVADA 6,274 2.3 31.2 32.3 19.4 10.2 4.1 2.8 0.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 2.7 8.6 42.6 29.2 12.4 4.8 2.5 0.0

NEW JERSEY 51,614 3.0 0.2 40.5 31.5 16.4 7.4 4.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 2.9 10.6 33.2 28.5 16.8 6.8 4.1 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 3.2 3.8 34.0 29.4 18.4 8.9 5.3 0.2NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 2.2 34.5 33.9 19.0 8.6 2.5 1.5 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 3.0 2.4 43.8 27.3 15.3 6.2 5.0 0.0OHIO 97,825 2.5 26.4 32.0 20.7 12.6 5.0 3.2 0.0OKLAHOMA 15,112 2.5 24.8 33.6 20.7 12.1 5.1 3.7 0.0OREGON 16,918 3.7 0.3 24.5 30.6 21.1 11.6 11.6 0.7PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 3.1 4.5 35.7 28.4 16.5 7.7 7.2 0.1

PUERTO RICO 31,812 3.9 0.3 20.9 28.1 25.8 12.6 11.5 1.2RHODE ISLAND 16,320 2.9 5.7 40.0 26.5 18.3 6.5 3.0 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 3.0 0.1 39.1 33.0 17.0 7.3 3.4 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 2.4 30.6 32.5 17.8 9.5 4.7 4.9 0.2TENNESSEE 53,788 2.6 21.4 34.5 23.8 12.7 4.8 2.8 0.1TEXAS 131,162 3.2 2.5 34.5 29.0 18.8 9.0 6.2 0.1UTAH 8,409 3.0 1.4 42.0 29.7 16.4 7.0 3.5 0.0VERMONT 6,048 2.6 13.6 38.4 27.5 13.3 5.3 1.9 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 4.4 0.0 14.9 22.4 22.3 16.0 23.0 2.4

VIRGINIA 31,834 2.6 16.8 36.7 25.9 13.7 4.9 1.9 0.0

WASHINGTON 57,008 3.1 2.2 39.0 29.4 15.8 7.5 5.8 0.2WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 2.7 18.4 31.7 25.2 15.0 6.7 3.0 0.0WISCONSIN 16,719 3.0 0.0 46.0 27.0 14.1 7.1 5.6 0.2WYOMING 599 2.0 42.7 32.0 14.5 7.5 2.2 1.1 0.0

TABLE 10:1

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES - ACTIVE CASES

OCTOBER 1999 - SEPTEMBER 2000

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF PERSONS LIVING IN THE HOUSEHOLD

NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS

SOURCE: NATIONAL TANF DATAFILE AS OF 5/23/2001

TOTALHOUSE-

HOLDSSTATE




of TANF Recipients


AVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 OVER 10U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 2.6 20.3 34.0 23.2 13.1 5.5 3.7 0.1 0.1

ALABAMA 19,068 2.7 28.0 25.2 16.4 15.7 9.6 4.8 0.2 0.0ALASKA 7,317 3.0 11.1 34.5 25.1 14.0 7.8 7.4 0.4 0.0ARIZONA 33,722 2.5 24.1 34.7 21.6 11.3 5.5 2.8 0.0 0.0ARKANSAS 11,336 2.3 24.6 39.7 20.7 9.6 3.2 2.0 0.0 0.2CALIFORNIA 501,019 2.6 17.7 36.5 24.2 13.4 4.7 3.5 0.1 0.0COLORADO 11,154 2.6 22.6 32.1 24.3 12.4 5.5 3.2 0.0 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 2.4 24.8 38.8 20.5 9.9 3.6 2.3 0.0 0.0DELAWARE 5,814 2.3 28.6 32.4 22.9 10.4 4.0 1.7 0.0 0.1DIST. OF COL. 17,563 2.7 16.9 35.8 24.3 12.8 5.6 4.5 0.0 0.2FLORIDA 67,355 2.3 32.2 34.5 18.9 8.7 3.5 2.3 0.0 0.0

GEORGIA 53,267 2.4 27.5 32.6 21.2 10.3 4.8 3.5 0.0 0.0a 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 14,705 2.9 10.1 37.9 26.2 14.1 7.3 4.5 0.0 0.0IDAHO 1,275 1.8 50.0 29.4 13.0 5.4 1.6 0.6 0.0 0.1ILLINOIS 88,493 3.0 15.4 28.3 24.4 17.2 9.0 5.7 0.0 0.0INDIANA 35,714 2.7 15.2 36.4 26.3 13.5 5.6 2.8 0.0 0.1IOWA 19,952 2.4 22.8 33.9 21.8 11.9 4.4 2.6 0.0 2.5KANSAS 12,576 2.6 21.6 33.3 24.3 12.4 5.1 2.9 0.0 0.4KENTUCKY 38,542 2.3 26.3 38.1 21.5 10.1 2.9 1.2 0.0 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 2.6 21.0 32.4 24.2 13.6 5.5 3.3 0.0 0.0

MAINE 10,864 2.6 15.1 38.8 25.5 14.0 4.6 1.8 0.0 0.2MARYLAND 27,523 2.8 20.7 29.8 22.9 13.9 7.1 5.5 0.2 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 2.3 24.8 42.6 19.6 8.4 3.2 1.4 0.0 0.0MICHIGAN 74,211 2.8 20.8 30.4 21.9 13.8 7.2 5.8 0.1 0.0MINNESOTA 39,293 3.0 14.2 34.2 22.4 14.4 7.2 7.3 0.5 0.0MISSISSIPPI 14,970 2.3 29.9 31.5 22.5 10.1 4.0 2.1 0.0 0.0MISSOURI 46,710 2.7 16.5 37.2 24.8 13.2 5.0 3.3 0.0 0.1MONTANA 4,555 2.8 13.5 34.9 25.0 14.7 6.9 4.9 0.0 0.1NEBRASKA 9,444 2.6 19.1 37.0 23.9 11.7 4.8 3.3 0.2 0.1NEVADA 6,274 2.3 32.4 32.0 18.6 10.1 3.8 2.8 0.0 0.2

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 2.4 21.5 40.8 23.6 9.2 3.5 1.2 0.0 0.1NEW JERSEY 51,614 2.5 19.9 37.9 22.9 12.3 4.7 2.4 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 2.9 10.7 33.1 28.7 16.6 6.9 4.1 0.0 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 2.8 18.2 31.2 24.3 14.6 7.2 4.5 0.1 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 2.3 32.2 33.1 19.6 9.1 3.3 2.6 0.2 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 2.6 19.2 38.6 22.1 11.9 4.7 3.4 0.0 0.0OHIO 97,825 2.5 25.8 32.1 20.9 12.7 5.1 3.3 0.0 0.1

OKLAHOMA 15,112 2.4 28.2 32.1 19.1 11.0 4.8 3.3 0.0 1.5OREGON 16,918 2.5 18.8 41.5 20.4 9.9 5.5 2.5 0.1 1.3PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 2.8 19.6 31.0 23.8 12.9 6.9 5.8 0.0 0.0

PUERTO RICO 31,812 3.1 6.2 30.8 27.0 19.8 8.4 5.4 0.1 2.4RHODE ISLAND 16,320 2.8 11.7 37.7 25.4 17.0 5.8 2.4 0.0 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 2.3 30.7 32.6 20.9 10.1 4.1 1.6 0.0 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 2.4 30.6 32.4 17.8 9.5 4.7 5.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 53,788 2.6 21.4 34.5 23.8 12.7 4.8 2.8 0.1 0.0TEXAS 131,162 2.7 18.2 33.2 24.5 14.9 6.0 3.3 0.0 0.0UTAH 8,409 2.6 18.1 35.7 24.6 13.4 5.3 2.8 0.0 0.1VERMONT 6,048 2.7 13.1 38.5 27.5 13.3 5.4 2.0 0.0 0.1VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 4.0 5.7 16.8 22.7 21.7 14.2 18.0 1.5 0.1VIRGINIA 31,834 2.2 27.9 36.9 21.7 9.5 2.9 0.9 0.0 0.3

WASHINGTON 57,008 2.7 19.8 33.2 24.6 12.7 5.3 4.3 0.2 0.0WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 2.7 18.7 31.7 25.0 14.9 6.6 3.0 0.0 0.2WISCONSIN 16,719 2.3 36.5 28.1 18.5 8.6 4.4 3.8 0.1 0.0WYOMING 599 2.0 43.0 31.9 14.2 7.9 2.2 0.9 0.0 0.0

TABLE 10:2



TOTALFAMILIES

NUMBER OF FAMILY MEMBERS

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENTS

STATE

NOTE: 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.


UNKNOWN




of TANF Recipients

X-21

NONE ONE TWO OR MORE

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 34.5 61.5 4.0

ALABAMA 19,068 52.2 47.4 0.4ALASKA 7,317 16.8 67.9 15.3ARIZONA 33,722 41.8 54.6 3.6ARKANSAS 11,336 46.5 52.0 1.5CALIFORNIA 501,019 38.4 60.6 1.0COLORADO 11,154 40.1 56.5 3.4CONNECTICUT 28,095 31.1 68.3 0.5DELAWARE 5,814 44.6 55.4 0.0DIST. OF COL. 17,563 28.0 71.4 0.6FLORIDA 67,355 52.8 47.1 0.1

GEORGIA 53,267 46.7 52.8 0.5GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 14.3 83.0 2.7IDAHO 1,275 69.2 28.7 2.1ILLINOIS 88,493 30.1 68.9 1.0

INDIANA 35,714 25.6 74.1 0.3IOWA 19,952 40.2 51.6 8.2KANSAS 12,576 34.2 60.0 5.8KENTUCKY 38,542 38.1 58.9 3.0LOUISIANA 27,820 39.4 59.5 1.1

MAINE 10,864 22.9 71.7 5.4MARYLAND 27,523 31.6 51.3 17.1MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 36.8 60.1 3.2MICHIGAN 74,211 31.3 63.5 5.2MINNESOTA 39,293 19.4 69.7 10.8MISSISSIPPI 14,970 59.5 40.4 0.1MISSOURI 46,710 25.5 71.5 3.0MONTANA 4,555 21.0 63.2 15.9NEBRASKA 9,444 31.0 68.6 0.4NEVADA 6,274 51.1 45.4 3.6

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 28.3 68.0 3.8

NEW JERSEY 51,614 36.2 63.8 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 19.8 70.1 10.1NEW YORK 257,790 24.0 65.2 10.8NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 51.3 47.8 0.9NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 30.2 68.9 0.9OHIO 97,825 37.8 57.8 4.4OKLAHOMA 15,112 44.2 55.0 0.8OREGON 16,918 35.8 57.9 6.3PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 32.1 64.0 3.8

PUERTO RICO 31,812 6.1 87.6 6.3RHODE ISLAND 16,320 17.4 80.1 2.5SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 53.2 44.5 2.3SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 53.4 46.6 0.0TENNESSEE 53,788 31.4 68.2 0.5TEXAS 131,162 34.0 61.6 4.4UTAH 8,409 29.7 67.2 3.1VERMONT 6,048 15.4 72.2 12.4

VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 15.5 61.3 23.2VIRGINIA 31,834 40.7 58.4 0.9

WASHINGTON 57,008 28.3 59.8 11.9WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 30.1 53.1 16.8WISCONSIN 16,719 67.0 32.0 1.0WYOMING 599 64.7 32.4 2.9


TABLE 10:3



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY NUMBER OF ADULT RECIPIENTS

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES

NUMBER OF ADULT RECIPIENTS





of TANF Recipients


AVERAGE ONE TWO THREE FOUR5 OR

MOREUNKNOW

N

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 2.0 44.2 28.4 15.3 6.3 3.8 2.0

ALABAMA 19,068 2.2 45.4 17.6 14.8 16.6 5.5 0.1ALASKA 7,317 2.1 43.7 28.6 13.9 7.3 5.6 0.9ARIZONA 33,722 1.9 47.7 26.4 15.1 6.0 3.2 1.5ARKANSAS 11,336 1.8 50.2 29.9 13.3 4.2 2.2 0.2CALIFORNIA 501,019 2.0 42.9 29.2 16.8 6.4 4.2 0.5COLORADO 11,154 2.0 41.9 30.4 15.8 6.0 3.7 2.2CONNECTICUT 28,095 1.8 52.3 25.0 11.6 4.3 2.5 4.4DELAWARE 5,814 1.8 49.3 28.6 13.9 4.7 2.1 1.3DIST. OF COL. 17,563 2.0 44.4 27.7 14.3 6.8 4.9 1.8FLORIDA 67,355 1.8 50.9 27.2 12.2 4.9 2.9 1.8

GEORGIA 53,267 1.9 47.2 29.0 13.2 5.8 4.1 0.6GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 2.0 44.3 27.6 14.8 7.4 4.4 1.5IDAHO 1,275 1.5 64.7 24.0 8.0 2.1 0.5 0.6ILLINOIS 88,493 2.3 35.4 28.9 19.9 9.5 6.3 0.0INDIANA 35,714 1.9 44.2 29.6 15.5 6.4 3.1 1.3IOWA 19,952 1.8 47.5 27.6 13.6 4.7 2.2 4.4KANSAS 12,576 1.9 42.7 30.3 14.0 5.7 2.8 4.4KENTUCKY 38,542 1.7 55.5 27.5 11.9 2.9 1.3 1.0LOUISIANA 27,820 2.0 42.4 28.7 16.2 7.3 4.1 1.3

MAINE 10,864 1.8 47.2 29.7 15.1 4.6 1.3 2.1MARYLAND 27,523 2.0 43.5 29.5 14.2 5.6 4.5 2.7MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 1.7 55.0 25.9 10.5 3.9 1.4 3.4MICHIGAN 74,211 2.1 40.3 27.4 14.5 8.4 5.6 3.8MINNESOTA 39,293 2.1 42.6 26.0 14.4 6.6 6.9 3.5MISSISSIPPI 14,970 1.9 43.9 30.8 15.4 6.2 3.1 0.6MISSOURI 46,710 1.9 46.1 30.1 14.0 5.1 3.3 1.4MONTANA 4,555 1.9 44.5 29.6 13.9 6.1 3.6 2.4NEBRASKA 9,444 1.9 45.4 29.8 13.5 5.7 3.6 2.0NEVADA 6,274 1.8 50.7 26.2 13.1 4.2 3.4 2.4

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 1.6 55.2 28.6 9.8 3.4 1.0 2.0NEW JERSEY 51,614 1.9 45.4 29.8 14.3 6.1 3.0 1.5NEW MEXICO 23,651 2.0 38.3 32.6 17.5 6.2 3.6 1.8NEW YORK 257,790 2.0 40.5 27.7 16.4 6.6 3.4 5.4NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 1.8 50.5 30.6 9.7 5.4 2.8 1.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 1.9 48.1 26.2 13.9 5.4 4.0 2.5OHIO 97,825 1.9 47.1 27.1 14.5 5.5 3.1 2.6OKLAHOMA 15,112 1.9 44.2 26.7 14.1 5.8 3.5 5.7OREGON 16,918 1.8 51.1 26.0 11.7 6.6 2.2 2.4PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 2.1 41.3 29.0 15.3 6.9 5.9 1.7

PUERTO RICO 31,812 2.2 31.3 28.5 19.7 7.5 5.1 7.9RHODE ISLAND 16,320 1.9 43.5 28.1 18.4 5.9 2.3 1.9SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 1.8 48.8 29.0 13.9 5.1 2.2 0.9SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 2.0 48.2 27.1 12.8 5.6 5.9 0.3TENNESSEE 53,788 1.9 47.2 27.3 14.8 5.4 3.2 2.0TEXAS 131,162 2.0 42.6 29.4 17.4 6.5 3.4 0.6UTAH 8,409 1.9 44.1 29.5 14.9 6.4 2.6 2.4

VERMONT 6,048 1.7 49.0 30.0 12.2 4.0 1.3 3.5VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 2.9 22.9 25.9 20.7 14.5 15.2 0.8VIRGINIA 31,834 1.7 55.0 28.2 10.9 3.7 1.1 1.2

WASHINGTON 57,008 1.9 45.8 29.0 14.0 4.8 3.3 3.2WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 1.8 47.4 31.2 14.0 5.0 1.9 0.5WISCONSIN 16,719 2.0 47.9 27.3 13.5 6.4 4.9 0.0WYOMING 599 1.6 59.1 25.5 11.3 2.7 0.7 0.7

TABLE 10:4



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN


STATETOTAL

FAMILIES

NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients

X-23

AVERAGE ONE TWO THREE FOUR5 OR

MORE UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 781,551 34.5 1.8 53.5 26.8 12.0 4.7 2.4 0.6

ALABAMA 19,068 9,955 52.2 2.0 53.6 15.2 12.8 14.7 3.7 0.1ALASKA 7,317 1,228 16.8 1.6 60.9 25.0 8.2 4.2 1.6 0.0ARIZONA 33,722 14,104 41.8 1.8 54.2 25.6 13.8 4.0 2.4 0.0ARKANSAS 11,336 5,273 46.5 1.7 52.8 31.4 11.5 3.2 0.8 0.3CALIFORNIA 501,019 192,154 38.4 2.0 44.9 29.0 15.7 6.8 3.6 0.0COLORADO 11,154 4,471 40.1 1.8 50.9 28.5 13.6 4.4 2.6 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 8,750 31.1 1.5 65.5 22.4 8.4 2.8 0.9 0.0DELAWARE 5,814 2,591 44.6 1.6 61.6 23.5 10.6 2.7 1.4 0.2DIST. OF COL. 17,563 4,912 28.0 1.8 54.5 23.8 12.0 5.9 3.2 0.6FLORIDA 67,355 35,592 52.8 1.7 57.4 26.3 10.5 3.9 1.9 0.0

GEORGIA 53,267 24,866 46.7 1.7 57.6 26.6 10.1 3.7 1.9 0.1a 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 14,705 2,110 14.3 1.7 60.5 23.4 9.2 5.0 1.9 0.0IDAHO 1,275 883 69.3 1.4 71.4 21.5 5.2 1.3 0.4 0.1ILLINOIS 88,493 26,632 30.1 1.8 51.0 27.9 13.2 4.6 3.2 0.0INDIANA 35,714 9,126 25.6 1.7 55.0 25.6 12.1 4.8 2.1 0.4IOWA 19,952 8,025 40.2 1.7 52.8 24.3 10.9 4.0 1.6 6.3

KANSAS 12,576 4,299 34.2 1.7 52.2 28.9 11.6 4.5 1.6 1.1KENTUCKY 38,542 14,699 38.1 1.5 66.4 23.7 7.4 1.8 0.7 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 10,972 39.4 1.9 50.0 25.4 14.0 7.3 3.3 0.0

MAINE 10,864 2,488 22.9 1.6 58.0 26.0 10.7 3.6 0.6 1.1MARYLAND 27,523 8,701 31.6 1.6 57.8 27.3 10.4 2.7 1.8 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 16,134 36.8 1.6 58.4 27.6 9.7 3.3 0.9 0.0MICHIGAN 74,211 23,247 31.3 1.8 54.6 26.7 9.8 5.1 3.8 0.0MINNESOTA 39,293 7,636 19.4 1.8 55.9 25.5 9.9 4.1 4.5 0.0MISSISSIPPI 14,970 8,905 59.5 1.8 49.2 28.3 14.4 5.5 2.5 0.1MISSOURI 46,710 11,913 25.5 1.6 59.6 27.8 7.5 3.2 1.6 0.3MONTANA 4,555 955 21.0 1.7 53.9 29.7 9.8 4.5 1.7 0.5NEBRASKA 9,444 2,924 31.0 1.7 55.7 28.6 9.5 3.6 2.1 0.4NEVADA 6,274 3,204 51.1 1.6 59.3 24.8 10.2 3.0 2.3 0.5

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 1,650 28.3 1.4 69.3 22.2 6.7 1.0 0.5 0.3NEW JERSEY 51,614 18,663 36.2 1.8 50.8 30.2 11.0 5.5 2.3 0.1NEW MEXICO 23,651 4,694 19.8 1.9 45.9 31.8 15.4 5.0 1.9 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 61,918 24.0 1.6 57.7 27.1 12.1 2.4 0.6 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 24,722 51.3 1.6 60.7 27.2 6.0 4.6 1.4 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 873 30.2 1.8 55.7 24.8 11.8 4.4 3.2 0.0

OHIO 97,825 37,001 37.8 1.6 61.8 24.6 9.2 2.9 1.5 0.1OKLAHOMA 15,112 6,682 44.2 1.7 54.6 27.4 10.2 3.1 1.2 3.5OREGON 16,918 6,061 35.8 1.8 49.5 29.2 10.8 5.3 1.5 3.6PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 28,520 32.1 1.7 55.8 26.6 11.5 3.1 3.1 0.0

PUERTO RICO 31,812 1,941 6.1 2.1 21.6 21.2 11.1 4.5 2.0 39.7RHODE ISLAND 16,320 2,842 17.4 1.7 56.1 27.1 12.4 3.4 1.1 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 8,536 53.2 1.7 56.0 26.6 11.6 3.9 2.0 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 1,497 53.4 1.7 56.7 27.1 9.6 3.5 2.9 0.1TENNESSEE 53,788 16,864 31.4 1.6 61.9 21.8 10.7 3.6 2.0 0.0TEXAS 131,162 44,568 34.0 1.8 51.8 27.5 13.1 4.9 2.8 0.0UTAH 8,409 2,496 29.7 1.7 53.6 27.4 11.8 5.6 1.0 0.5VERMONT 6,048 931 15.4 1.4 69.0 20.4 6.5 3.0 0.3 0.9VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 144 15.4 2.5 34.6 23.5 16.6 12.4 12.4 0.4VIRGINIA 31,834 12,949 40.7 1.5 66.3 22.8 6.5 2.9 0.8 0.7

WASHINGTON 57,008 16,105 28.3 1.6 58.9 26.0 11.1 2.8 1.2 0.0WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 3,557 30.1 1.6 61.0 25.9 8.6 3.0 1.1 0.6WISCONSIN 16,719 11,200 67.0 1.8 54.4 25.3 12.3 4.8 3.2 0.0WYOMING 599 388 64.8 1.5 65.3 24.6 7.6 1.8 0.6 0.0

TABLE 10:5


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES WITH NO ADULTS BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN



STATENO ADULTFAMILIES


TOTALFAMILIES


PERCENT




of TANF Recipients


AVERAGE ONE TWO THREE FOUR

5 OR

MORE UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,394,953 2.1 40.0 29.3 16.9 6.8 4.2 2.8


GEORGIA 28,123 2.1 38.2 31.0 15.9 7.7 6.1 1.1GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 12,202 2.1 41.6 28.5 15.5 7.9 4.8 1.7IDAHO 366 1.7 50.4 29.7 13.7 3.5 0.8 2.0

ILLINOIS 60,989 2.4 28.9 29.4 22.6 11.6 7.5 0.0INDIANA 26,466 2.0 40.3 31.0 16.6 7.0 3.4 1.6IOWA 10,297 1.8 46.3 29.4 14.7 4.5 2.0 3.1KANSAS 7,550 2.0 38.5 30.9 14.9 6.0 3.4 6.2KENTUCKY 22,698 1.8 49.2 29.8 14.4 3.5 1.5 1.6LOUISIANA 16,548 2.1 37.6 30.8 17.5 7.3 4.6 2.1


NEW HAMPSHIRE 3,967 1.7 50.8 30.5 10.8 4.1 1.0 2.8

NEW JERSEY 32,951 2.0 42.3 29.5 16.1 6.4 3.4 2.3NEW MEXICO 16,577 2.0 37.9 32.9 17.6 6.2 3.1 2.2NEW YORK 168,136 2.1 36.3 28.4 17.9 7.6 3.3 6.6NORTH CAROLINA 23,016 2.0 40.0 34.1 13.5 6.1 4.2 2.1NORTH DAKOTA 1,992 2.0 45.0 26.6 14.8 5.8 4.2 3.5OHIO 56,520 2.1 39.3 28.4 17.6 6.7 3.7 4.3OKLAHOMA 8,311 2.2 36.1 26.2 17.1 7.9 5.4 7.4OREGON 9,789 1.8 53.5 24.5 11.5 7.0 1.7 1.8PENNSYLVANIA 56,853 2.2 35.1 30.1 16.8 8.4 6.9 2.7

PUERTO RICO 27,874 2.2 33.0 28.8 20.0 7.8 4.8 5.6RHODE ISLAND 13,068 2.0 41.2 28.2 19.6 6.2 2.4 2.4SOUTH CAROLINA 7,150 1.9 41.4 31.7 16.3 6.4 2.1 2.0SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 2.3 38.5 27.1 16.4 8.0 9.4 0.6TENNESSEE 36,669 2.0 40.6 29.7 16.7 6.2 3.8 2.9TEXAS 80,817 2.1 38.6 30.5 19.4 7.1 3.4 1.0UTAH 5,650 2.0 40.9 30.4 15.9 6.5 3.1 3.2VERMONT 4,367 1.7 48.0 31.4 12.1 3.9 1.1 3.5VIRGIN ISLANDS 573 2.8 20.8 27.8 23.0 14.3 13.6 0.6

VIRGINIA 18,586 1.8 47.3 31.9 13.7 4.2 1.3 1.6



TABLE 10:6

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY F AMILIES - ACTIVE CASES


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES WITH ONE ADULT BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES


NOTE: 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORT ED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.




of TANF Recipients

X-25

AVERAGE ONE TWO THREE FOUR 5 ORMORE UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 89,910 2.6 27.5 27.9 19.3 10.9 10.2 4.1

ALABAMA 82 3.0 26.1 7.0 24.1 30.5 9.6 2.6ALASKA 1,119 3.0 21.3 25.9 21.0 14.4 17.4 0.0ARIZONA 1,205 2.3 31.8 28.9 21.4 11.8 5.6 0.5ARKANSAS 169 2.1 35.6 35.2 17.2 9.8 1.6 0.6CALIFORNIA 5,004 2.7 32.5 17.8 17.2 16.9 15.7 0.0COLORADO 382 2.5 27.4 29.9 21.4 10.6 10.0 0.7CONNECTICUT 150 3.0 13.4 37.6 22.1 13.4 13.5 0.0DELAWARE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --DIST. OF COL. 105 2.8 14.9 43.9 14.6 12.8 12.8 1.0FLORIDA 41 3.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

GEORGIA 278 2.4 22.8 39.6 19.6 10.9 5.9 1.2a -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 393 2.1 43.3 21.3 23.7 6.0 4.0 1.6

IDAHO 26 2.0 39.8 27.3 25.0 7.6 0.3 0.0ILLINOIS 871 2.9 13.4 28.3 33.5 10.5 14.2 0.0INDIANA 122 1.7 61.7 9.9 24.4 0.0 4.0 0.0IOWA 1,630 2.4 28.5 31.9 20.2 9.4 6.6 3.3KANSAS 727 2.2 30.7 32.7 17.8 9.7 3.7 5.4KENTUCKY 1,145 2.1 38.0 30.9 19.3 4.7 4.7 2.4LOUISIANA 300 2.3 33.1 30.5 20.4 8.9 5.5 1.5

MAINE 586 2.6 21.4 35.2 24.7 11.3 7.1 0.2MARYLAND 4,710 2.6 25.4 32.9 20.6 9.9 9.8 1.4MASSACHUSETTS 1,386 2.3 36.0 26.9 18.7 9.9 6.0 2.6MICHIGAN 3,823 2.8 24.0 27.7 13.0 18.6 14.4 2.2MINNESOTA 4,256 2.9 23.7 28.9 18.5 10.1 17.7 1.0MISSISSIPPI 20 2.3 4.1 62.9 31.9 1.1 0.0 0.0MISSOURI 1,416 2.3 29.2 33.6 23.0 8.6 4.0 1.6MONTANA 723 2.4 29.1 31.4 19.5 10.5 8.8 0.7NEBRASKA 39 4.3 12.4 10.8 10.8 30.8 35.2 0.0NEVADA 223 2.3 32.0 35.2 16.9 4.6 11.0 0.3

NEW HAMPSHIRE 221 2.2 27.2 43.4 15.1 8.2 6.0 0.1NEW JERSEY -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --NEW MEXICO 2,380 2.5 26.1 32.0 21.0 8.8 10.1 2.1NEW YORK 27,737 2.6 28.1 24.6 17.1 9.8 10.1 10.2NORTH CAROLINA 419 2.6 21.8 35.4 23.7 8.9 9.3 1.0NORTH DAKOTA 25 2.5 27.1 36.4 9.6 7.6 13.6 5.8OHIO 4,305 2.6 24.3 32.5 20.2 13.3 8.4 1.3OKLAHOMA 119 2.3 24.2 26.3 16.7 7.7 4.7 20.4OREGON 1,068 2.5 38.4 21.2 18.9 10.1 10.2 1.2PENNSYLVANIA 3,392 2.6 24.2 29.5 22.4 12.2 11.6 0.0

PUERTO RICO 1,997 2.8 17.2 31.4 23.6 6.1 12.5 9.1RHODE ISLAND 410 2.5 26.1 30.4 24.9 11.1 7.0 0.4SOUTH CAROLINA 372 2.4 27.0 34.0 21.6 9.3 7.9 0.2SOUTH DAKOTA -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --TENNESSEE 255 2.2 29.4 36.6 19.0 15.0 0.0 0.0TEXAS 5,778 2.4 28.3 29.6 23.0 11.4 6.9 0.8UTAH 263 2.5 21.9 31.8 22.5 12.4 6.5 4.9VERMONT 751 2.1 29.9 33.8 20.2 5.9 3.5 6.7VIRGIN ISLANDS 217 3.2 20.7 22.5 17.3 16.6 21.4 1.5VIRGINIA 298 1.9 44.3 30.9 20.2 0.0 3.5 1.0

WASHINGTON 6,796 2.6 28.0 29.2 20.2 11.0 11.4 0.3WEST VIRGINIA 1,988 2.2 30.9 36.9 21.3 7.6 3.3 0.0WISCONSIN 170 2.5 28.6 33.9 18.5 9.7 9.3 0.0WYOMING 18 2.2 27.1 36.0 27.7 7.0 1.5 0.7


TABLE 10:7


OCTOBER 1999 - SEPTEMBER 2000PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES WITH TWO OR MORE ADULTS BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN

STATE TOTALFAMILIES






of TANF Recipients


STATETOTAL

FAMILIES HISPANIC* WHITE BLACKAMERICAN

NATIVE ASIAN HAWAIIANMULTI-RACIAL UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 25.0 31.2 38.6 1.6 2.2 0.5 0.1 0.8


GEORGIA 53,267 1.3 20.6 77.6 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0GUAM b/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 1.0 15.8 1.4 0.2 12.9 37.8 0.0 30.9IDAHO 1,275 12.7 77.9 1.3 6.9 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.0ILLINOIS 88,493 8.8 15.4 73.1 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.2INDIANA 35,714 5.1 47.2 46.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.2

IOWA 19,952 3.9 76.7 16.7 0.8 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.6KANSAS 12,576 9.6 57.9 29.7 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.0KENTUCKY 38,542 0.5 76.8 21.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2LOUISIANA b/ 27,820 0.4 14.0 85.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0


NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 3.3 93.3 2.8 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0NEW JERSEY 51,614 26.2 13.6 59.4 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 62.1 19.3 4.5 14.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

NEW YORK 257,790 37.7 19.1 42.0 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 3.6 26.8 62.0 2.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.8NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 1.9 38.1 1.8 57.5 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0OHIO 97,825 3.1 44.2 52.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0OKLAHOMA 15,112 4.0 41.2 37.2 9.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 7.3OREGON 16,918 7.3 79.0 8.5 2.4 2.1 0.0 0.3 0.5PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 12.5 34.5 50.3 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.5

PUERTO RICO 31,812 99.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9RHODE ISLAND 16,320 28.4 44.5 13.5 0.3 2.9 0.0 0.0 10.4SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 0.6 23.7 74.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.2SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 0.8 18.0 1.6 79.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 53,788 0.5 37.5 61.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0TEXAS 131,162 49.9 19.9 29.3 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0UTAH 8,409 15.4 70.5 3.4 8.6 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.1VERMONT 6,048 0.5 97.1 1.6 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 31.6 0.7 67.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGINIA 31,834 3.8 29.8 65.6 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY ETHNICITY/RACE

TABLE 10:8



NOTE: '*'= CAN BE OF ANY RACE. 'b/'= DATA REPORTED IN ERROR. ESTIMATE WITH AGGREGATE DATA SUBMITTED FOR




of TANF Recipients

X-27

PARENT CARE-TAKERMINOR

SIBLINGOTHER

PERSON**

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 2,349,889 67.5 18.2 11.3 0.1 2.9

ALABAMA 19,068 19,693 47.3 0.4 52.3 0.0 0.0ALASKA 7,317 9,002 80.1 0.5 19.2 0.1 0.2ARIZONA 33,722 21,086 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ARKANSAS 11,336 11,958 53.3 21.2 25.4 0.0 0.1CALIFORNIA 501,019 521,757 60.3 25.3 8.0 0.0 6.4COLORADO 11,154 7,076 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 29,102 67.0 12.7 18.7 0.0 1.6DELAWARE 5,814 6,335 58.1 9.2 29.3 0.0 3.4DIST. OF COL. 17,563 18,080 70.7 13.3 14.1 0.1 1.9FLORIDA 67,355 68,812 46.2 25.9 27.5 0.0 0.4

GEORGIA 53,267 30,209 95.0 4.2 0.7 0.0 0.1GUAM a/ 2,721 2,518 -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 13,232 98.3 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.0

IDAHO 1,275 1,680 24.9 0.5 74.6 0.0 0.0ILLINOIS 88,493 94,238 66.6 19.2 9.2 0.2 4.9INDIANA 35,714 39,203 68.3 13.7 16.8 0.0 1.1IOWA 19,952 17,063 98.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.9KANSAS 12,576 13,542 66.9 16.4 16.4 0.0 0.3KENTUCKY 38,542 39,104 63.9 32.2 0.0 0.0 3.9LOUISIANA 27,820 27,920 61.4 20.6 16.8 0.0 1.2

MAINE 10,864 13,406 66.9 12.5 7.6 0.5 12.5MARYLAND 27,523 23,532 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MASSACHUSETT 43,895 48,160 60.5 27.3 11.9 0.0 0.3MICHIGAN 74,211 85,719 63.9 20.5 15.6 0.0 0.0MINNESOTA 39,293 46,201 77.8 14.6 6.6 0.0 1.0MISSISSIPPI 14,970 16,067 44.0 35.5 15.5 0.0 4.9MISSOURI 46,710 50,087 72.3 14.7 12.0 0.0 1.0MONTANA 4,555 5,520 79.9 0.0 18.3 0.0 1.8NEBRASKA 9,444 8,070 81.5 14.7 3.9 0.0 0.0NEVADA 6,274 6,776 55.5 9.4 33.8 0.0 1.3

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 6,928 63.6 13.2 18.7 3.9 0.5NEW JERSEY 51,614 54,464 60.5 5.4 34.1 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 21,375 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 291,178 77.9 15.2 5.6 0.0 1.3NORTH CAROLIN 48,157 51,877 46.0 14.0 33.5 0.0 6.5NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 3,035 67.3 19.2 11.7 0.0 1.8OHIO 97,825 85,538 76.2 22.0 0.6 0.0 1.1OKLAHOMA 15,112 8,783 99.2 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.0OREGON 16,918 18,719 63.7 1.4 34.9 0.0 0.0PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 96,015 66.4 21.0 10.0 2.5 0.1

PUERTO RICO 31,812 41,201 78.0 4.1 0.4 0.5 17.0RHODE ISLAND 16,320 15,472 89.8 6.6 3.7 0.0 0.0SOUTH CAROLIN 16,059 18,293 43.2 19.0 37.2 0.0 0.6SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 3,258 40.1 14.1 45.9 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 53,788 54,472 68.3 13.7 18.1 0.0 0.0TEXAS 131,162 142,504 64.8 23.5 10.9 0.0 0.8

UTAH 8,409 8,864 69.7 13.9 16.4 0.0 0.0VERMONT 6,048 7,154 82.4 11.2 5.8 0.0 0.5VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 1,357 79.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 5.1VIRGINIA 31,834 25,427 75.4 21.3 0.0 0.0 3.2

WASHINGTON 57,008 67,023 71.2 17.2 11.5 0.0 0.1WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 14,548 70.6 4.3 9.0 1.5 14.6WISCONSIN 16,719 17,025 33.4 33.9 32.6 0.0 0.1WYOMING 599 231 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

RECIPIENTADULT

NOTE: '*' = ADULT OR MINOR CHILD HEAD-OF-HOUSEHOLD '**'= PERSON WHOSE INCOME IS CONSIDERED IN

DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.


NON-RECIPIENT ADULT

STATETOTAL

FAMILIESTOTAL

ADULTS

TABLE 10:9

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES -ACTIVE CASES

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF ALL ADULTS* LIVING IN THE HOUSEHOLD BY THE FAMILY AFFILIATION





of TANF Recipients


YES NOU.S. TOTAL 991,806 13.9 86.1

ALABAMA a/ 9,348 -- --ALASKA 3,514 9.5 90.5

a 13,710 -- --ARKANSAS 4,749 32.1 67.9CALIFORNIA 230,362 14.7 85.3COLORADO 4,801 14.4 85.6CONNECTICUT 12,038 12.4 87.6DELAWARE 2,199 14.9 85.1DIST. OF COL. 5,931 15.2 84.8FLORIDA 29,548 9.6 90.4

GEORGIA 23,829 8.0 92.0GUAM a/ -- -- --HAWAII 7,068 9.6 90.4IDAHO 458 9.8 90.2

ILLINOIS 41,934 11.0 89.0INDIANA 12,448 17.3 82.7IOWA 6,510 9.3 90.7KANSAS 5,219 18.3 81.7KENTUCKY 14,968 53.2 46.8LOUISIANA 12,133 9.9 90.1

MAINE 4,748 8.5 91.5MARYLAND 12,009 12.8 87.2MASSACHUSETTS 17,948 17.1 82.9MICHIGAN 33,655 10.2 89.8MINNESOTA 20,688 15.6 84.4MISSISSIPPI 6,583 10.3 89.7MISSOURI 17,853 16.9 83.1MONTANA 2,145 14.3 85.7NEBRASKA 3,833 11.6 88.4NEVADA 2,322 15.3 84.7

NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,810 14.2 85.8NEW JERSEY 23,484 9.0 91.0NEW MEXICO 9,862 13.5 86.5NEW YORK 119,220 3.0 97.0NORTH CAROLINA 18,368 11.4 88.6NORTH DAKOTA 1,165 0.0 100.0OHIO 40,683 15.4 84.6OKLAHOMA 6,539 0.0 100.0OREGON 7,121 0.2 99.8PENNSYLVANIA 42,446 12.4 87.6

PUERTO RICO 15,242 33.6 66.4RHODE ISLAND 6,667 12.5 87.5SOUTH CAROLINA 7,281 16.5 83.5SOUTH DAKOTA 1,428 6.4 93.6TENNESSEE 21,791 13.8 86.2TEXAS 49,915 18.7 81.3

UTAH 3,646 14.3 85.7VERMONT 2,287 15.1 84.9VIRGIN ISLANDS a/ 698 -- --VIRGINIA 11,763 69.3 30.7

WASHINGTON 23,842 12.6 87.4WEST VIRGINIA 5,156 52.1 47.9WISCONSIN 8,606 6.3 93.7WYOMING 226 7.6 92.4

TABLE 10:10



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF TEEN RECIPIENTS WITH TEEN PARENT STATUS

STATE

TOTAL TEEN

RECIPIENTS

TEEN PARENT STATUS






of TANF Recipients

X-29

STATE

TOTAL CHILD-ONLY

FAMILIES

CHILD-ONLY

FAMILIES w/PARENTS

NOT IN AU PERCENT SANCTION* SSI BENEFIT

UNKNOWN

CITIZENSHIP/ALIENAGE

STATUS

OTHER/

UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 781,551 348,641 46.3 11.4 41.5 26.1 21.0

ALABAMA 9,955 72 0.7 0.0 62.7 0.0 37.3ALASKA 1,228 29 2.4 0.0 0.0 41.0 59.0ARIZONA 14,104 -- -- -- -- -- --ARKANSAS 5,273 2,334 44.3 1.5 72.9 1.3 24.3CALIFORNIA 192,154 103,873 54.1 25.0 25.3 46.2 3.5COLORADO 4,471 -- -- -- -- -- --CONNECTICUT 8,750 3,398 38.8 0.0 52.7 17.4 29.9DELAWARE 2,591 561 21.7 1.9 0.0 5.3 92.8DIST. OF COL. 4,912 2,358 48.0 62.7 23.1 3.4 10.8FLORIDA 35,592 15,575 43.8 3.9 46.0 0.0 50.1

GEORGIA 24,866 1,225 4.9 8.0 47.3 21.0 23.7GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 2,110 139 6.6 0.0 0.0 5.1 94.9

IDAHO 883 7 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0ILLINOIS 26,632 17,709 66.5 0.3 44.2 18.0 37.5INDIANA 9,126 4,697 51.5 17.4 77.8 3.8 1.0IOWA 8,025 65 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0KANSAS 4,299 2,023 47.1 0.0 66.7 0.2 33.1KENTUCKY 14,699 8,732 59.4 0.8 91.5 0.0 7.7LOUISIANA 10,972 5,146 46.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 99.8

MAINE 2,488 1,177 47.3 12.6 0.0 0.0 87.4MARYLAND 8,701 -- -- -- -- -- --MASSACHUSETTS 16,134 10,996 68.2 7.1 84.9 5.1 2.9MICHIGAN 23,247 13,368 57.5 7.3 61.6 2.7 28.4MINNESOTA 7,636 4,619 60.5 0.2 77.4 18.0 4.4MISSISSIPPI 8,905 5,457 61.3 1.0 98.6 0.1 0.3MISSOURI 11,913 5,840 49.0 0.0 72.0 0.0 28.0MONTANA 955 -- -- -- -- -- --NEBRASKA 2,924 978 33.4 0.0 39.9 0.0 60.1NEVADA 3,204 594 18.5 9.6 72.2 20.4 0.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE 1,650 659 39.9 1.7 42.0 0.0 56.3NEW JERSEY 18,663 2,948 15.8 99.2 0.0 0.0 0.8NEW MEXICO 4,694 11 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0NEW YORK 61,918 37,572 60.7 1.6 47.1 39.8 11.5NORTH CAROLINA 24,722 5,899 23.9 7.2 68.0 12.4 12.4NORTH DAKOTA 873 518 59.3 64.0 31.6 0.0 4.4OHIO 37,001 15,397 41.6 0.1 45.9 0.0 54.0OKLAHOMA 6,682 48 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0OREGON 6,061 254 4.2 100.0 0.0 13.8 0.0PENNSYLVANIA 28,520 15,572 54.6 19.8 0.2 0.0 80.0

PUERTO RICO 1,941 1,169 60.2 18.9 0.8 0.0 80.3RHODE ISLAND 2,842 841 29.6 0.0 82.9 0.0 17.1SOUTH CAROLINA 8,536 3,140 36.8 4.4 93.3 0.9 1.4SOUTH DAKOTA 1,497 334 22.3 1.3 92.6 0.0 6.1TENNESSEE 16,864 7,043 41.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0TEXAS 44,568 26,044 58.4 0.0 27.0 59.3 13.7UTAH 2,496 1,053 42.2 0.0 78.4 19.0 2.6VERMONT 931 492 52.8 3.6 99.5 0.0 0.0

VIRGIN ISLANDS 144 -- -- -- -- -- --VIRGINIA 12,949 4,418 34.1 3.3 84.3 11.1 1.3

WASHINGTON 16,105 8,286 51.4 0.8 49.4 45.3 4.5WEST VIRGINIA 3,557 324 9.1 0.0 90.2 0.0 9.8WISCONSIN 11,200 5,647 50.4 0.0 94.4 0.1 5.5WYOMING 388 -- -- -- -- -- --

NOTE: '*'= SANCTIONED PARENTS COULD ALSO RECEIVE SSI BENEFITS OR BE IN UNKNOWN CITIZENSHIP / ALIENAGE

STATUS. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR. '--'= DATA NOT REPORTED.

SOURCE: NATIIONAL TANF DATAFILE AS OF 5/23/2001


TABLE 10:11


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF CHILD-ONLY CASES WITH PARENTS

REASONS FOR PARENTS LIVING IN THE HOUSEHOLD BUT NOT IN THE ASSISTANT UNIT (AU)




of TANF Recipients


PERCENTMONTHLYAVERAGE

PUBLICHOUSING

RENTSUBSIDY FEDERAL

STATE/LOCAL

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 98.8 79.9 224.01 6.5 11.2 6.2 1.8


GEORGIA 53,267 98.7 73.0 222.81 11.7 5.3 0.3 0.0GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 14,705 100.0 85.6 377.18 2.0 6.6 12.6 0.3IDAHO 1,275 97.8 46.3 204.43 0.0 3.1 10.7 0.0ILLINOIS 88,493 99.7 79.5 269.45 0.0 0.0 0.3 14.7INDIANA 35,714 100.0 87.7 250.58 6.6 8.5 14.4 0.0IOWA 19,952 67.1 72.7 208.20 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0KANSAS 12,576 100.0 79.1 231.51 5.4 13.0 12.6 0.0KENTUCKY 38,542 97.4 77.4 199.21 0.6 15.8 5.0 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 100.0 90.0 246.91 5.2 4.8 7.3 0.0



PUERTO RICO 31,812 94.2 97.6 217.43 26.6 17.5 2.9 19.6RHODE ISLAND 16,320 100.0 91.9 209.76 9.5 18.6 2.6 12.6SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 100.0 75.5 226.73 11.6 13.2 8.7 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 100.0 68.4 229.26 34.7 0.0 5.1 0.0TENNESSEE 53,788 100.0 90.4 209.60 1.1 1.5 0.0 20.2TEXAS 131,162 100.0 86.8 259.79 11.3 15.5 8.0 0.4UTAH 8,409 100.0 79.8 250.82 0.0 0.0 17.8 0.0VERMONT 6,048 100.0 87.7 218.47 0.0 25.4 19.1 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 100.0 88.9 474.62 0.0 0.0 21.1 0.0VIRGINIA 31,834 100.0 67.5 233.37 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0


TABLE 10:12


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES RECEIVING ASSISTANCE



TYPE OF ASSISTANCE

FOOD STAMPS SUBSIDIZED HOUSING UBSIDIZED CHILD CAR


MEDICALASSISTANCE

TOTALFAMILIESSTATE




of TANF Recipients

X-31

PECENT MONTHLYAVERAGE PERCENT MONTHLYAVERAGE

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 10.0 $173.88 11.1 $252.42

ALABAMA 19,068 10.5 88.57 3.6 58.4ALASKA 7,317 13.2 51.39 55.3 289.9ARIZONA 33,722 4.0 272.87 22.3 99.9ARKANSAS 11,336 2.2 129.94 5.7 221.9CALIFORNIA 501,019 7.0 103.13 11.8 382.0COLORADO 11,154 4.6 164.49 2.0 174.4CONNECTICUT 28,095 16.3 238.96 20.7 377.9DELAWARE 5,814 18.6 156.88 12.5 154.2DIST. OF COL. 17,563 2.2 173.17 4.3 295.5FLORIDA 67,355 10.6 261.90 6.3 198.5

GEORGIA 53,267 16.8 239.07 8.7 85.7GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- --HAWAII a/ 14,705 -- -- -- --

IDAHO 1,275 20.7 222.76 13.9 169.3ILLINOIS 88,493 3.4 104.48 0.7 104.5INDIANA 35,714 8.5 173.88 29.7 460.1IOWA 19,952 a/ -- 8.7 210.9KANSAS 12,576 11.4 144.50 15.5 163.3KENTUCKY 38,542 12.8 219.59 13.0 353.8LOUISIANA 27,820 9.8 174.87 9.5 162.6

MAINE 10,864 33.2 273.88 8.4 187.2MARYLAND 27,523 9.2 228.38 10.7 180.0MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 14.7 261.63 20.1 266.8MICHIGAN 74,211 12.1 183.66 3.1 350.8MINNESOTA 39,293 17.1 285.18 28.8 402.9MISSISSIPPI 14,970 10.4 120.87 3.5 229.1MISSOURI 46,710 4.6 146.73 3.5 171.3MONTANA 4,555 13.0 164.42 8.0 172.1NEBRASKA 9,444 a/ -- 34.7 694.5NEVADA 6,274 4.9 144.94 9.5 332.7

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 11.2 243.36 22.1 180.4NEW JERSEY 51,614 14.5 134.30 0.4 219.8NEW MEXICO 23,651 0.1 137.17 15.3 169.5NEW YORK 257,790 16.5 238.57 2.1 247.7NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 7.9 189.53 5.4 390.5NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 16.0 169.24 2.6 431.5OHIO a/ 97,825 -- -- -- --OKLAHOMA 15,112 5.6 281.15 4.2 353.5OREGON 16,918 1.6 12.67 7.3 a/PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 1.4 113.78 11.8 119.1

PUERTO RICO 31,812 1.0 90.51 0.2 149.7RHODE ISLAND 16,320 23.3 286.33 28.8 190.7SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 22.2 190.72 17.9 197.4SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 15.2 218.09 8.5 164.9TENNESSEE 53,788 4.6 187.39 15.5 160.2TEXAS 131,162 9.3 213.05 20.6 83.4UTAH 8,409 a/ -- 3.3 209.6VERMONT 6,048 24.4 193.62 40.7 142.5VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 9.8 120.75 23.9 211.7VIRGINIA 31,834 17.8 130.24 15.4 114.3

WASHINGTON 57,008 22.1 262.63 25.9 191.1WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 1.6 259.15 24.9 258.7WISCONSIN 16,719 7.7 224.26 7.2 165.9WYOMING 599 12.5 195.53 14.0 185.5


CHILD SUPPORT CASH RESOURCES

TABLE 10:13



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES WITH RECEIPT OF CHILD SUPPORT AND WITH CASH

STATE TOTALFAMILIES





of TANF Recipients


PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGE PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGE PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGEU.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 6.1 $107.58 8.7 $48.95 8.8 $71.80

ALABAMA 19,068 7.8 29.76 2.4 14.90 0.0 0.00ALASKA 7,317 4.7 473.61 2.9 86.67 2.7 315.73ARIZONA 33,722 3.1 104.35 0.6 19.21 19.6 19.24ARKANSAS 11,336 6.6 48.57 0.4 22.32 6.7 48.31CALIFORNIA 501,019 8.6 140.72 9.2 30.67 18.2 114.30COLORADO 11,154 2.0 128.87 9.1 25.82 0.0 0.00CONNECTICUT 28,095 0.0 0.00 5.1 35.71 6.6 56.96DELAWARE 5,814 4.9 128.93 6.4 26.22 8.4 93.60DIST. OF COL. 17,563 13.4 73.98 6.9 39.82 5.0 113.05FLORIDA 67,355 2.5 120.41 7.3 13.16 3.5 38.75

GEORGIA 53,267 0.7 115.78 7.2 23.66 7.4 40.26GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 0.0 0.00 7.0 57.98 64.3 142.10IDAHO 1,275 0.2 68.21 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00

ILLINOIS 88,493 3.1 193.90 7.5 39.43 14.5 68.08INDIANA 35,714 13.3 9.04 3.7 25.75 28.5 17.89IOWA 19,952 2.5 0.00 3.7 77.87 0.0 0.00KANSAS 12,576 0.0 0.00 6.2 41.02 0.0 0.00KENTUCKY 38,542 4.6 95.24 1.3 29.21 0.0 0.00LOUISIANA 27,820 3.0 54.92 2.5 17.20 2.5 57.71

MAINE 10,864 3.2 219.31 5.0 53.89 0.0 0.00MARYLAND 27,523 11.4 35.02 8.3 36.43 24.1 45.47MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 4.1 26.97 1.3 45.41 14.5 90.96MICHIGAN 74,211 2.7 90.42 4.5 36.81 0.0 0.00MINNESOTA 39,293 8.6 186.56 20.0 29.86 0.0 0.00MISSISSIPPI 14,970 1.1 25.47 2.1 21.94 11.5 27.82MISSOURI 46,710 4.8 70.18 6.6 27.92 0.0 0.00MONTANA 4,555 2.4 239.53 0.2 27.85 5.5 130.49NEBRASKA 9,444 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 2.1 0.00NEVADA 6,274 9.9 221.96 2.4 56.12 0.0 0.00

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 6.5 132.00 2.5 44.39 0.0 0.00

NEW JERSEY 51,614 5.7 132.84 10.5 35.88 13.5 81.49NEW MEXICO 23,651 7.2 142.96 6.4 58.39 1.9 137.88NEW YORK 257,790 8.8 116.15 28.1 45.33 0.1 69.85NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 5.7 154.60 1.7 377.32 0.0 0.00NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 12.0 178.73 14.9 39.05 15.3 44.89OHIO 97,825 0.1 110.18 3.8 38.11 4.6 212.68OKLAHOMA 15,112 2.1 0.00 4.3 28.26 0.0 0.00OREGON 16,918 4.3 133.78 3.9 50.29 0.0 0.00PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 4.8 91.41 5.5 29.17 0.0 0.00

PUERTO RICO 31,812 5.0 19.13 0.8 24.76 2.5 9.56RHODE ISLAND 16,320 2.5 98.42 3.0 29.16 0.0 0.00SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 1.7 58.16 5.1 20.15 3.3 44.88SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 4.5 175.73 2.8 25.06 3.5 10.00TENNESSEE 53,788 0.0 0.00 4.1 19.40 7.8 56.87TEXAS 131,162 13.6 66.04 6.2 167.71 2.1 66.97UTAH 8,409 4.9 100.00 2.8 49.06 0.0 0.00VERMONT 6,048 5.3 120.42 2.7 56.10 0.0 0.00VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 0.9 60.00 5.9 28.02 0.0 0.00

VIRGINIA 31,834 2.3 66.46 1.4 25.48 5.3 73.64

WASHINGTON 57,008 5.1 139.12 5.3 37.39 32.1 245.17WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 7.9 106.51 5.6 33.53 17.2 67.27WISCONSIN 16,719 7.5 269.39 1.1 62.14 0.0 0.00WYOMING 599 5.7 261.96 6.1 22.59 0.2 119.00

TABLE 10:14


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY REASON FOR GRANT REDUCTION


OTHER**SANCTION RECOUPMENT*

NOTES: '*'= RECOUPMENT OF A PRIOR OVERPAYMENT. '**'= INCLUDEDS REASONS SUCH AS A REDUCED BENEFIT

BECAUSE FAMILY MOVED INTO THE STATE FROM ANOTHER STATE, OR BECAUSE OF STATE'S FAMILY CAP POLICY. 'a/'=

DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.

SOURCE: NATIONAL TANF DATAFILE AS OF 5/23/2001 (CONTINUED…..)

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES




of TANF Recipients

X-33




of TANF Recipients


STATETOTAL

FAMILIES

WORK

REQUIRE-MENT

TEEN

PARENT

NOT INSCHOOL

NO-COOP.

CHILDSUPPORT

FAILURE

COMPLY

WITHOTHERS

OTHERSANCTION

RECOUP-MENT

FAMILYCAP

LENGTH

RECEIVING

ASSISTANCE

OTHER

NON-SANCTION

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 3.5 0.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 8.7 4.1 0.9 3.8

ALABAMA 19,068 4.6 0.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0ALASKA 7,317 1.7 0.8 0.4 2.3 0.4 2.9 0.0 0.0 2.7ARIZONA 33,722 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.6 10.4 9.8 4.2ARKANSAS 11,336 3.4 0.2 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.4 4.7 0.0 1.4CALIFORNIA 501,019 4.8 0.2 1.3 1.7 1.1 9.2 9.0 0.0 10.0COLORADO 11,154 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.1 6.6 0.0 0.0DELAWARE 5,814 2.9 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 1.2DIST. OF COL. 17,563 8.3 0.7 2.5 0.7 0.6 6.9 0.2 0.1 2.3FLORIDA 67,355 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 7.3 3.1 0.0 0.4

GEORGIA 53,267 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 7.2 7.4 0.0 0.0GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 64.1 0.7IDAHO 1,275 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

ILLINOIS 88,493 2.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 7.5 14.1 0.1 0.1INDIANA 35,714 2.2 0.0 2.2 8.3 1.4 3.7 12.8 12.4 7.1IOWA 19,952 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0KANSAS 12,576 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0KENTUCKY 38,542 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.5

MAINE 10,864 2.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MARYLAND 27,523 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 8.3 0.0 0.0 24.1MASSACHUSETT 43,895 2.0 1.6 1.5 0.0 2.0 1.3 14.5 0.0 0.0MICHIGAN 74,211 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0MINNESOTA 39,293 2.7 0.4 0.6 5.2 0.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MISSISSIPPI 14,970 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.1 11.5 0.0 0.0MISSOURI 46,710 4.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0MONTANA 4,555 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 5.3NEBRASKA 9,444 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0NEVADA 6,274 2.5 0.0 0.3 0.9 6.2 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 4.2 0.0 0.1 1.0 0.7 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0

NEW JERSEY 51,614 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 10.5 13.5 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 6.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 6.4 0.0 0.1 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 8.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 28.1 0.0 0.0 0.1NORTH CAROLIN 48,157 1.6 0.2 1.3 3.1 0.7 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 10.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 14.9 4.2 0.0 11.9OHIO 97,825 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 4.6OKLAHOMA 15,112 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.2 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0OREGON 16,918 0.0 0.0 0.4 3.9 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 2.9 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.3 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0

PUERTO RICO 31,812 3.4 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.1RHODE ISLAND 16,320 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0SOUTH CAROLIN 16,059 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.0 0.2 5.1 2.4 0.0 0.5SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 3.5TENNESSEE 53,788 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.5 0.0 0.0TEXAS 131,162 7.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.7 6.2 0.0 2.1 0.0UTAH 8,409 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0VERMONT 6,048 1.2 0.1 2.8 1.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGINIA 31,834 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.1 1.4 5.3 0.0 0.0

WASHINGTON 57,008 3.6 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.1 5.3 0.0 0.0 32.1WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 5.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 0.2WISCONSIN 16,719 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0WYOMING 599 3.3 0.0 0.7 1.3 0.4 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

NOTE: THIS CONTINUED TABLE DOES NOT INCLUDE UNKNOWN REASON FOR A REDUCTION IN ASSISTANCE. '*'= SOME RECEIVED A

REDUCTION IN ASSISTANCE FOR TWO OR MORE REASONS. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.


TABLE 10:14 (cont.)


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY REASONS* FOR GRANT REDUCTION





of TANF Recipients

X-35

ACCRUAL OF

MONTHS

TERMINATION

OF ASSISTANCE

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 60.8 35.6 3.6 0.0 0.0

ALABAMA a/ 19,068 -- -- -- -- --ALASKA 7,317 68.0 16.8 15.2 0.0 0.0ARIZONA a/ 33,722 -- -- -- -- --ARKANSAS 11,336 55.0 44.8 0.1 0.2 0.0CALIFORNIA 501,019 61.5 38.5 0.0 0.0 0.0COLORADO 11,154 59.9 40.1 0.0 0.0 0.0CONNECTICUT 28,095 49.8 31.1 19.1 0.0 0.0DELAWARE 5,814 36.7 39.9 23.4 0.0 0.0DIST. OF COL. 17,563 77.9 21.9 0.1 0.1 0.1FLORIDA 67,355 45.1 52.8 2.0 0.0 0.0

GEORGIA 53,267 53.8 46.2 0.0 0.0 0.0GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- -- -- --HAWAII a/ 14,705 -- -- -- -- --IDAHO 1,275 30.8 69.2 0.0 0.0 0.0ILLINOIS 88,493 47.7 30.0 22.2 0.0 0.1INDIANA a/ 35,714 -- -- -- -- --IOWA 19,952 28.2 71.8 0.0 0.0 0.0KANSAS 12,576 65.9 34.1 0.0 0.0 0.0KENTUCKY 38,542 61.9 38.1 0.0 0.0 0.0LOUISIANA 27,820 57.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

MAINE 10,864 76.7 22.7 0.7 0.0 0.0MARYLAND 27,523 64.8 31.5 3.7 0.0 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 26.3 36.8 37.0 0.0 0.0MICHIGAN 74,211 68.5 31.5 0.0 0.0 0.0MINNESOTA 39,293 77.0 19.4 3.6 0.0 0.0MISSISSIPPI 14,970 47.1 52.9 0.0 0.0 0.0MISSOURI 46,710 74.3 25.7 0.0 0.0 0.0MONTANA 4,555 53.3 12.3 34.2 0.1 0.1

NEBRASKA 9,444 68.2 30.0 1.8 0.0 0.0NEVADA 6,274 57.1 42.7 0.1 0.1 0.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 72.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW JERSEY 51,614 63.8 36.2 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 23,651 79.9 20.1 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW YORK 257,790 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0NORTH CAROLINA a/ 48,157 -- -- -- -- --NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 90.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0OHIO 97,825 62.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0OKLAHOMA 15,112 56.4 43.6 0.0 0.0 0.0OREGON a/ 16,918 -- -- -- -- --PENNSYLVANIA a/ 88,765 -- -- -- -- --

PUERTO RICO a/ 31,812 -- -- -- -- --RHODE ISLAND 16,320 78.6 17.5 3.9 0.0 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 29.0 53.2 17.9 0.0 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 14.7 53.4 31.9 0.0 0.0

TENNESSEE 53,788 43.5 56.5 0.0 0.0 0.0TEXAS 131,162 66.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0UTAH 8,409 70.9 27.6 1.2 0.3 0.0VERMONT 6,048 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 86.4 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGINIA 31,834 22.8 40.6 36.5 0.0 0.0

WASHINGTON 57,008 71.7 28.3 0.1 0.0 0.0WEST VIRGINIA 11,830 69.9 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0WISCONSIN 16,719 33.0 67.0 0.0 0.0 0.0WYOMING 599 35.3 64.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

TABLE 10:15




PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY THE FEDERAL TIME LIMIT EXEMPTION STATUS

FEDEERAL 5-YEAR TIME LIMIT EXEMPTION STATUS

INCLUDED BUT EXEMPT FROM

HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD OR SPOUSE

RECEIVING ASSISTANCE

STATE


TOTAL FAMILIES NOT EXEMPT

NOT INCLUDED

EXEMPT UNKNOWN




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-37

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES

SINGLE-

PARENT

TWO-

PARENT

NO-

PARENTU.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 63.1 2.6 34.3


GEORGIA 53,267 55.7 0.0 44.3GUAM a/ 2,721 -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 85.7 0.0 14.3IDAHO 1,275 28.7 2.1 69.2

ILLINOIS 88,493 69.3 0.6 30.1INDIANA 35,714 74.4 0.0 25.6IOWA 19,952 53.5 6.3 40.2KANSAS 12,576 62.0 3.9 34.1KENTUCKY 38,542 59.9 2.0 38.1LOUISIANA 27,820 59.5 1.1 39.4


NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 70.6 1.1 28.3NEW JERSEY 51,614 63.8 0.0 36.2NEW MEXICO 23,651 72.9 7.2 19.8NEW YORK 257,790 71.1 4.9 24.0NORTH CAROLINA 48,157 47.9 0.9 51.3NORTH DAKOTA 2,890 69.8 0.0 30.2OHIO 97,825 59.0 3.2 37.8OKLAHOMA 15,112 55.7 0.8 43.6OREGON 16,918 61.5 7.5 31.0PENNSYLVANIA 88,765 64.7 3.1 32.1

PUERTO RICO 31,812 96.7 2.2 1.1RHODE ISLAND 16,320 80.1 2.5 17.4SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 44.5 2.3 53.2SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 46.6 0.0 53.4TENNESSEE 53,788 68.6 0.0 31.4TEXAS 131,162 61.6 4.4 34.0UTAH 8,409 70.3 0.0 29.7VERMONT 6,048 76.9 8.0 15.2VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 84.9 0.0 15.1VIRGINIA 31,834 59.3 0.0 40.7



TABLE 10:16


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FAMILIES BY TYPE OF FAMILY FOR WORK PARTICIPATION






of TANF Recipients


UNDER 20 20-29 30-39 40-49 OVER 49 UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 7.1 42.5 32.1 14.7 3.6 0.1


GEORGIA 28,679 8.6 51.9 28.0 9.4 2.1 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 5.7 38.8 32.8 18.5 4.1 0.0IDAHO 419 10.6 46.4 29.4 12.1 1.5 0.0



NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,409 5.7 48.3 33.3 10.3 2.3 0.0NEW JERSEY 32,951 5.5 40.5 33.0 16.3 4.7 0.1NEW MEXICO 21,364 6.9 42.5 33.6 14.2 2.7 0.1NEW YORK 226,838 5.8 35.7 34.9 18.3 5.3 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 23,854 8.8 52.2 28.0 9.2 1.8 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 2,043 9.1 46.8 30.6 10.5 3.1 0.0OHIO 65,164 10.6 48.8 28.2 10.5 1.9 0.0OKLAHOMA 8,550 8.1 52.0 26.7 11.0 2.3 0.0OREGON 11,925 10.1 40.0 30.0 16.5 3.3 0.0PENNSYLVANIA 63,783 8.5 42.4 30.1 16.3 2.8 0.0

PUERTO RICO 31,870 2.3 36.1 39.2 16.8 4.2 1.3RHODE ISLAND 13,888 5.4 44.0 34.2 14.7 1.8 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 9.1 44.1 31.1 12.4 3.0 0.3SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 7.0 43.9 32.2 14.8 2.1 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 8.7 51.6 29.1 9.1 1.6 0.0TEXAS 92,372 8.8 47.9 26.5 12.3 4.5 0.0UTAH 6,175 8.5 45.9 31.1 12.7 1.9 0.0VERMONT 5,880 6.9 43.2 36.0 11.9 2.1 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 10.4 36.5 30.7 15.9 6.5 0.0VIRGINIA 19,183 8.2 49.8 28.7 10.7 2.5 0.0


AGE OF ADULT RECIPIENTS


STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS


TABLE 10:17



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY AGE GROUP




of TANF Recipients

X-39

UNDER 20 20-29 30-39 40-49 OVER 49 UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 152,697 5.9 24.1 34.1 25.4 10.4 0.1

ALABAMA 277 5.6 13.3 31.4 38.7 7.8 3.3ALASKA 1,606 1.0 21.9 36.5 30.1 10.5 0.0ARIZONA 1,978 2.1 21.7 35.6 32.6 7.9 0.0ARKANSAS 466 5.2 28.7 33.4 23.6 7.7 1.3CALIFORNIA 25,504 5.6 13.0 38.0 28.0 15.4 0.0COLORADO 657 2.9 24.9 37.9 25.1 9.1 0.0CONNECTICUT 672 1.5 17.5 41.8 28.2 11.0 0.0DELAWARE 139 12.5 8.3 49.5 22.9 3.8 2.9DIST. OF COL. 463 11.2 21.2 29.6 25.4 10.4 2.2FLORIDA 1,268 0.0 10.7 39.8 32.1 17.4 0.0

GEORGIA 720 7.7 10.9 44.3 23.6 13.6 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 1,315 6.3 19.7 30.6 32.3 11.0 0.0IDAHO 54 4.0 21.8 34.8 35.6 3.7 0.2

ILLINOIS 2,035 3.3 26.9 30.4 24.6 14.8 0.0INDIANA 1,047 0.0 23.3 35.5 35.0 6.2 0.0IOWA 2,230 3.3 32.6 40.0 20.0 4.0 0.0KANSAS 1,093 5.0 34.1 26.9 27.6 6.5 0.0KENTUCKY 2,946 2.0 24.6 45.3 23.7 4.4 0.0LOUISIANA 520 1.7 24.6 32.4 30.5 10.7 0.0

MAINE 1,156 2.5 23.1 38.7 32.1 3.7 0.0MARYLAND 5,148 2.7 25.6 41.3 22.9 7.6 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 2,510 1.3 23.4 34.2 30.9 10.1 0.0MICHIGAN 5,992 1.3 23.9 36.1 27.4 11.3 0.0MINNESOTA 6,304 2.9 32.0 36.6 21.2 7.3 0.0MISSISSIPPI 112 0.0 10.8 36.2 47.5 5.6 0.0MISSOURI 2,599 3.4 32.8 37.2 23.3 3.3 0.0MONTANA 1,003 3.3 35.1 35.1 21.5 5.0 0.0NEBRASKA 428 6.2 29.3 36.5 21.3 6.7 0.0NEVADA 333 5.0 25.3 33.5 30.4 5.7 0.0

NEW HAMPSHIRE 420 0.5 22.7 40.5 26.7 9.5 0.0NEW JERSEY 933 0.4 2.4 43.6 43.4 10.2 0.0NEW MEXICO 2,967 3.5 31.6 38.1 21.1 5.6 0.0NEW YORK 30,872 15.4 29.0 23.2 21.6 10.8 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 969 0.4 18.6 34.7 32.6 13.7 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 176 1.1 21.1 38.8 25.2 13.8 0.0OHIO 5,919 3.0 29.2 38.0 23.3 6.5 0.0OKLAHOMA 393 0.6 19.9 38.0 32.1 9.3 0.0OREGON 1,657 3.2 25.0 31.5 29.0 11.2 0.0PENNSYLVANIA 5,858 7.1 20.9 32.4 30.0 9.6 0.0

PUERTO RICO 3,124 0.9 14.7 36.8 34.5 11.0 2.2RHODE ISLAND 887 0.9 23.4 40.0 27.9 7.7 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 688 2.4 26.3 36.4 24.9 9.7 0.2SOUTH DAKOTA 98 0.4 5.9 45.8 33.9 14.0 0.0TENNESSEE 1,580 1.0 30.0 27.2 34.1 7.7 0.0TEXAS 10,321 3.0 27.4 30.9 24.7 14.0 0.0UTAH 498 1.8 20.9 41.9 28.8 6.7 0.0

VERMONT 1,066 4.2 27.2 41.8 22.9 3.8 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 168 24.5 38.2 15.1 10.8 11.4 0.0VIRGINIA 975 2.5 10.4 44.4 34.7 8.1 0.0

WASHINGTON 9,706 2.5 27.0 40.5 21.1 8.9 0.0WEST VIRGINIA 2,515 2.0 32.1 40.1 21.1 4.7 0.0WISCONSIN 300 1.5 28.5 34.3 23.8 11.9 0.0WYOMING 33 4.1 21.5 36.7 28.3 9.3 0.0

TABLE 10:18



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF MALE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY AGE GROUP


STATE

TOTAL MALE

ADULTS

AGE OF MALE ADULT RECIPIENTS





of TANF Recipients


UNDER 20 20-29 30-39 40-49 OVER 49 UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,425,865 7.3 44.4 31.9 13.5 2.8 0.1






PUERTO RICO 28,712 2.5 38.4 39.5 14.9 3.5 1.2RHODE ISLAND 13,001 5.7 45.4 33.8 13.8 1.4 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 7,207 9.8 45.7 30.6 11.2 2.4 0.3SOUTH DAKOTA 1,207 7.5 46.9 31.2 13.2 1.2 0.0TENNESSEE 35,599 9.1 52.5 29.2 8.0 1.3 0.0TEXAS 82,051 9.5 50.5 25.9 10.8 3.3 0.0UTAH 5,677 9.1 48.0 30.1 11.3 1.5 0.0

VERMONT 4,814 7.5 46.7 34.7 9.5 1.7 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 910 7.8 36.2 33.6 16.8 5.6 0.0VIRGINIA 18,208 8.5 51.9 27.8 9.5 2.2 0.0


TABLE 10:19


OCTOBER 1999 - SEPTEMBER 2000PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FEMALE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY AGE GROUP

STATE

FEMALE

ADULTS

AGE OF FEMALE ADULT RECIPIENTS






of TANF Recipients

X-41

STATE

TOTALADULTS HISPANIC* WHITE BLACK

AMERICANNATIVE ASIAN HAWAIIAN

MULTI-RACIAL UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 23.7 32.8 37.9 1.8 2.6 0.5 0.1 0.7


GEORGIA 28,679 1.1 18.9 79.7 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 1.0 16.6 1.6 0.2 13.7 36.9 0.0 30.0IDAHO 419 10.0 84.5 1.5 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.0ILLINOIS 62,732 7.0 13.6 77.5 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.5INDIANA 26,710 5.3 46.7 46.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.2IOWA 13,606 3.1 80.2 14.4 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.5KANSAS 9,005 8.5 61.9 26.7 1.8 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0KENTUCKY 24,988 0.7 74.7 23.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2

LOUISIANA b/ 17,147 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,409 3.2 93.5 2.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW JERSEY 32,951 28.4 12.0 58.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 21,364 59.1 21.2 3.6 16.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0NEW YORK 226,838 37.6 20.6 40.2 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 23,854 1.5 29.3 64.3 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.6NORTH DAKOTA 2,043 2.0 40.2 2.3 54.9 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0OHIO 65,164 3.2 45.4 51.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0OKLAHOMA 8,550 3.6 41.9 44.8 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0

OREGON 11,925 5.8 81.7 7.8 2.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.2PENNSYLVANIA 63,783 13.0 33.4 49.9 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.6

PUERTO RICO 31,870 99.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9RHODE ISLAND 13,888 28.2 46.5 13.3 0.3 3.0 0.0 0.0 8.6SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 1.0 28.8 69.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 0.6 17.5 1.5 80.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 0.7 34.7 64.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0TEXAS 92,372 49.6 22.0 27.4 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0UTAH 6,175 12.1 74.1 3.3 8.8 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0VERMONT 5,880 0.5 97.0 1.8 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 31.9 0.9 66.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGINIA 19,183 3.1 31.2 64.9 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY ETHNICITY/RACE

TABLE 10:20



NOTE: '*'= CAN BE OF ANY RACE. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED. 'b/'= DATA REPORTED IN ERROR.




of TANF Recipients


SINGLE MARRIED SEPARATED WIDOWED DIVORCEDU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 65.3 12.4 13.1 0.7 8.5

ALABAMA 9,196 69.2 3.7 17.6 0.1 9.4ALASKA 7,210 39.1 30.0 14.9 1.5 14.4ARIZONA 20,824 54.4 16.2 15.3 1.1 12.9ARKANSAS 6,231 70.9 8.0 12.6 0.1 8.4CALIFORNIA 314,081 63.0 9.5 16.1 1.3 10.2COLORADO 7,067 68.0 16.4 10.1 0.0 5.5CONNECTICUT 19,495 72.9 5.9 13.1 0.6 7.5DELAWARE 3,224 74.6 3.5 13.8 0.5 7.7DIST. OF COL. 12,756 93.8 2.3 3.4 0.1 0.4FLORIDA 31,804 61.4 6.8 17.4 0.9 13.5

GEORGIA 28,679 77.1 3.7 11.1 0.6 7.5GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 53.9 8.3 23.3 1.1 13.5IDAHO 419 42.2 19.6 17.3 0.3 20.6

ILLINOIS 62,732 83.2 5.8 6.0 0.6 4.3INDIANA 26,710 64.5 7.9 13.5 0.6 13.5IOWA 13,606 55.2 27.7 7.5 0.3 9.2KANSAS 9,005 53.2 18.9 12.3 0.6 15.0KENTUCKY 24,988 50.3 18.4 16.6 0.6 14.1LOUISIANA 17,147 77.4 5.1 11.4 0.4 5.8

MAINE 8,963 65.1 14.2 8.4 0.5 11.9MARYLAND 23,532 63.2 26.1 8.4 0.2 2.1MASSACHUSETTS 29,148 71.2 14.3 9.2 0.2 5.1MICHIGAN 54,788 61.0 13.6 10.5 0.7 14.1MINNESOTA 35,916 55.5 18.1 16.1 0.8 9.5MISSISSIPPI 6,085 71.3 2.5 15.0 1.2 10.0MISSOURI 36,214 70.5 8.9 12.8 0.3 7.5MONTANA 4,324 51.7 25.4 8.5 0.5 13.9NEBRASKA 6,572 99.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0NEVADA 3,293 62.5 13.9 12.6 0.1 10.9

NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,409 53.9 3.7 13.6 0.7 28.1NEW JERSEY 32,951 75.8 2.7 15.5 0.5 5.6NEW MEXICO 21,364 65.2 12.7 14.5 0.9 6.8NEW YORK 226,838 73.4 13.4 9.3 0.6 3.4NORTH CAROLINA 23,854 74.8 4.4 12.3 0.7 7.8NORTH DAKOTA 2,043 60.6 8.6 14.0 0.5 16.3OHIO 65,164 65.6 15.1 10.0 0.5 8.8OKLAHOMA 8,550 63.2 7.1 18.8 0.2 10.7OREGON 11,925 63.4 17.0 9.8 0.7 9.2PENNSYLVANIA 63,783 70.5 13.7 8.1 0.5 7.3

PUERTO RICO 31,870 63.6 16.7 10.0 1.3 8.3RHODE ISLAND 13,888 76.2 9.3 9.8 0.4 4.2SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 57.7 11.8 20.5 0.7 9.2SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 69.0 11.4 8.4 1.0 10.2TENNESSEE 37,179 64.5 8.1 15.5 0.8 11.1TEXAS 92,372 50.7 18.4 20.9 0.9 9.1

UTAH 6,175 39.0 16.3 21.9 0.7 22.1VERMONT 5,880 66.0 9.0 19.7 0.1 5.2VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 82.7 4.9 7.0 0.4 5.0VIRGINIA 19,183 64.1 8.5 17.8 0.7 8.9


TABLE 10:21



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY MARITAL STATUS


STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

MARITAL STATUS





of TANF Recipients

X-43

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS YES NOU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 0.8 99.2

ALABAMA 9,196 0.8 99.2ALASKA 7,210 0.5 99.5ARIZONA 20,824 0.5 99.5ARKANSAS 6,231 1.2 98.8CALIFORNIA 314,081 1.3 98.7COLORADO 7,067 0.2 99.8CONNECTICUT 19,495 1.1 98.9DELAWARE 3,224 1.2 98.8DIST. OF COL. 12,756 0.5 99.5FLORIDA 31,804 0.5 99.5

GEORGIA 28,679 0.8 99.2GUAM a/ -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 0.3 99.7IDAHO 419 0.1 99.9ILLINOIS 62,732 0.7 99.3INDIANA 26,710 0.6 99.4IOWA 13,606 0.0 100.0KANSAS 9,005 1.0 99.0KENTUCKY 24,988 0.5 99.5LOUISIANA 17,147 0.0 100.0


NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,409 3.2 96.8NEW JERSEY 32,951 0.1 99.9NEW MEXICO 21,364 0.7 99.3NEW YORK 226,838 1.2 98.8NORTH CAROLINA 23,854 0.7 99.3NORTH DAKOTA 2,043 0.5 99.5OHIO 65,164 0.1 99.9OKLAHOMA 8,550 0.1 99.9OREGON 11,925 0.2 99.8PENNSYLVANIA 63,783 0.2 99.8

PUERTO RICO 31,870 0.8 99.2RHODE ISLAND 13,888 0.8 99.2SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 1.5 98.5SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 0.2 99.8TENNESSEE 37,179 1.1 98.9

TEXAS 92,372 0.5 99.5UTAH 6,175 0.2 99.8VERMONT 5,880 0.7 99.3VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 0.3 99.7VIRGINIA 19,183 0.5 99.5



TABLE 10:22



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULTS RECEIVING DISABILITY





of TANF Recipients


HOUSEHOL

D SPOUSE PARENT

STEP-

CHILD

GRAND-

CHILD

OTHER

RELATED UNRELATEDU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 92.6 4.4 0.2 1.0 0.0 0.4 1.4


GEORGIA 28,679 98.7 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 96.5 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7IDAHO 419 93.4 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4



NEW HAMPSHIRE 4,409 93.6 5.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1


PUERTO RICO 31,870 92.1 6.4 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.2 0.0RHODE ISLAND 13,888 95.8 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 94.6 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 99.3 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2TENNESSEE 37,179 98.6 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2TEXAS 92,372 93.7 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1UTAH 6,175 94.8 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0VERMONT 5,880 84.9 9.8 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 4.9VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 73.3 1.8 4.7 12.6 0.1 3.0 4.5

VIRGINIA 19,183 95.5 2.6 0.9 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.5WASHINGTON 47,700 83.9 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.6WEST VIRGINIA 10,262 77.4 18.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.8WISCONSIN 5,689 96.9 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3WYOMING 229 90.7 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.8


TABLE 10:23



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY RELATIONSHIP TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

RELATIONSHIP TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD





of TANF Recipients

X-45

1 - 6 7 - 9 10 - 11 12

MORE

THAN 12 UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 2.6 3.8 12.5 30.0 47.5 3.4 0.4

ALABAMA 9,196 0.3 0.8 14.8 31.2 41.9 11.1 0.0ALASKA a/ 7,210 -- -- -- -- -- -- --ARIZONA 20,824 1.6 2.2 15.2 25.7 49.0 6.4 0.0ARKANSAS 6,231 6.2 1.2 9.4 31.6 48.0 3.7 0.0CALIFORNIA 314,081 1.7 8.3 10.9 30.7 46.3 2.0 0.0COLORADO 7,067 6.6 1.9 9.3 24.0 57.6 0.7 0.0CONNECTICUT 19,495 0.2 2.5 18.0 28.2 47.4 3.7 0.0DELAWARE a/ 3,224 -- -- -- -- -- -- --DIST. OF COL. 12,756 0.2 1.5 9.8 37.7 48.0 2.8 0.0FLORIDA 31,804 0.3 3.2 10.2 23.7 37.2 6.6 18.8

GEORGIA 28,679 29.5 0.8 8.5 22.6 37.2 1.4 0.0GUAM b/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 0.3 4.0 4.7 17.8 68.0 5.1 0.0IDAHO 419 51.3 1.0 6.9 11.7 27.3 1.8 0.0ILLINOIS 62,732 0.0 2.1 3.1 47.2 46.1 1.4 0.0INDIANA 26,710 0.8 0.4 13.4 31.0 54.2 0.3 0.0IOWA 13,606 35.1 0.0 36.2 0.0 21.2 7.5 0.0KANSAS 9,005 2.3 1.0 11.4 25.3 50.9 9.1 0.0KENTUCKY 24,988 2.2 1.5 17.2 25.6 53.0 0.4 0.0LOUISIANA 17,147 9.1 0.8 11.3 35.9 42.7 0.3 0.0

MAINE 8,963 7.8 1.1 11.1 17.8 48.8 13.5 0.0MARYLAND 23,532 0.0 0.8 10.3 42.5 43.4 3.0 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 29,148 0.4 1.9 11.1 27.4 52.8 6.3 0.0MICHIGAN 54,788 1.1 2.0 8.2 33.1 54.2 1.4 0.0MINNESOTA 35,916 7.2 3.4 8.9 24.9 45.3 10.3 0.0MISSISSIPPI 6,085 0.0 1.4 15.7 31.1 38.8 13.1 0.0MISSOURI 36,214 0.1 0.5 11.6 35.1 47.5 5.2 0.0MONTANA 4,324 0.0 0.5 10.6 21.5 61.7 5.7 0.0NEBRASKA a/ 6,572 -- -- -- -- -- -- --NEVADA 3,293 0.1 1.1 7.7 33.9 55.2 2.0 0.0


PUERTO RICO 31,870 4.5 12.7 24.8 17.8 36.0 4.2 0.0RHODE ISLAND 13,888 2.1 2.6 15.7 22.4 53.9 3.4 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 0.1 1.5 15.0 27.4 55.9 0.1 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 0.4 0.6 13.3 24.5 60.6 0.5 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 5.2 4.1 14.7 28.8 46.7 0.6 0.0TEXAS 92,372 2.6 6.1 25.0 23.2 41.6 1.4 0.0UTAH 6,175 3.1 2.4 8.0 27.2 55.0 4.3 0.0VERMONT 5,880 1.0 1.1 13.0 19.5 59.7 5.7 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 18.5 3.4 30.1 21.6 23.8 2.6 0.0

VIRGINIA 19,183 0.5 0.8 14.3 29.4 53.7 1.3 0.0WASHINGTON 47,700 1.1 3.1 11.2 23.2 46.3 15.1 0.0WEST VIRGINIA 10,262 0.3 1.1 22.5 26.5 43.9 5.7 0.0WISCONSIN 5,689 0.7 0.7 9.6 46.4 42.4 0.2 0.0WYOMING 229 0.0 0.2 7.1 16.0 75.6 1.2 0.0

TABLE 10:24

YEARS OF EDUCATION

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY EDUCATIONAL LEVEL


STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

NOTES: 'a/'= DATA REPORTED BUT NOT RELIABLE. 'b/'= DATA NOT REPORTED.

NO FORMAL

EDUCATION





of TANF Recipients


STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS U.S. CITIZEN

QUALIFIED

ALIEN UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 91.0 7.9 1.1


GEORGIA 28,679 99.4 0.6 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 97.9 2.1 0.0IDAHO 419 99.1 0.9 0.0ILLINOIS 62,732 98.1 1.8 0.1INDIANA 26,710 99.3 0.7 0.0IOWA 13,606 100.0 0.0 0.0KANSAS 9,005 97.1 2.9 0.0KENTUCKY 24,988 99.2 0.8 0.0LOUISIANA 17,147 99.7 0.3 0.0



PUERTO RICO 31,870 99.2 0.8 0.0RHODE ISLAND 13,888 85.1 14.9 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 99.7 0.3 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 100.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 99.9 0.1 0.0TEXAS 92,372 89.2 10.8 0.0UTAH 6,175 97.2 2.8 0.0VERMONT 5,880 98.9 1.1 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 85.1 12.7 2.2VIRGINIA 19,183 98.1 1.9 0.0



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY CITIZENSHIP STATUS

TABLE 10:25







of TANF Recipients

X-47

NONE

CHILDUNDER

12 MONTHSSANCTION/

WAIVERTRIBALWORK

DISABLED/EXEMPT

TEEN

PARENTIN

EDUCATION

U.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 63.4 6.8 10.9 0.5 10.3 8.1


GEORGIA 28,679 69.8 22.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7

GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 71.2 14.3 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.4IDAHO 419 80.6 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2ILLINOIS 62,732 75.2 16.6 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.5INDIANA 26,710 33.2 5.2 46.5 0.0 10.5 4.7IOWA 13,606 64.1 0.0 7.3 0.0 1.1 27.4KANSAS 9,005 41.4 18.4 0.0 0.0 14.3 25.9KENTUCKY 24,988 74.8 11.4 7.7 0.0 2.2 3.9LOUISIANA 17,147 49.1 18.0 6.0 0.0 8.6 18.3



PUERTO RICO 31,870 80.6 1.6 4.2 0.1 11.3 2.3RHODE ISLAND 13,888 70.7 11.3 2.8 0.0 6.6 8.6SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 35.0 11.7 33.0 0.0 10.7 9.7SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 61.3 17.3 1.8 0.0 0.0 19.6TENNESSEE 37,179 86.1 3.9 8.7 0.0 1.2 0.0

TEXAS 92,372 31.4 0.0 60.8 0.0 1.5 6.2UTAH 6,175 87.6 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.1 7.3VERMONT 5,880 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS a/ 1,077 -- -- -- -- -- --VIRGINIA 19,183 52.8 0.0 44.9 0.0 0.0 2.3



TABLE 10:26


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY WORK EXEMPTION STATUS


WORK EXEMPTION STATUS

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

NOTE: 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED.




of TANF Recipients


NO YES

UNSUB-

SIDIZEDEMPLOY-

MENT

WORKPREPAR-ATION**

JOBSEARCH

JOBTRAINING/

EDUCATION

OTHERWORK

ACTIVITIESU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 57.8 42.2 25.8 7.1 5.2 7.3 3.6


GEORGIA 28,679 76.4 23.6 10.6 4.2 1.4 7.3 3.4GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 13,007 53.5 46.5 38.4 8.1 7.2 4.0 0.0IDAHO 419 13.3 86.7 27.1 9.4 29.8 25.4 38.0ILLINOIS 62,732 42.8 57.2 41.0 6.0 0.5 11.4 3.7INDIANA 26,710 46.1 53.9 47.1 0.5 2.2 3.3 7.2IOWA 13,606 35.4 64.6 57.7 0.8 1.0 8.6 6.1KANSAS 9,005 29.7 70.3 34.5 6.6 0.0 6.8 41.4KENTUCKY 24,988 70.3 29.7 16.5 6.1 0.7 6.6 1.5LOUISIANA 17,147 66.1 33.9 21.8 5.2 2.1 7.9 0.0



PUERTO RICO 31,870 75.2 24.8 4.2 7.0 9.5 5.3 0.6RHODE ISLAND 13,888 58.7 41.3 30.0 1.4 2.1 8.4 2.3SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 59.5 40.5 23.7 1.4 2.9 7.2 11.8SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 39.4 60.6 15.4 39.9 4.7 10.7 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 48.4 51.6 22.4 0.7 13.5 20.9 14.1TEXAS 92,372 85.2 14.8 6.4 0.7 6.2 2.5 4.5UTAH 6,175 21.9 78.1 22.2 1.6 14.5 17.1 52.5

VERMONT 5,880 51.7 48.3 26.8 2.0 12.3 13.0 10.5VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 92.1 7.9 1.8 2.9 0.3 2.9 0.1VIRGINIA 19,183 74.4 25.6 20.0 1.5 7.8 0.7 0.0



WORK PARTICIPATION ? TYPE OF WORK ACTIVITIES

TABLE 10:27

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS PARTICIPATING IN WORK ACTIVITIES*


TOTALADULTSSTATE

NOTES: '*'= SOME PARTICIPATED IN 2 OR 3 WORK ACTIVITIES. '**'= SUBSIDIZED JOBS, ON-THE-JOB TRAINING, WORK




of TANF Recipients

X-49

NONE 1-10 11-20 21-30 OVER 30 UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 57.8 4.3 7.3 12.2 18.0 0.3






PUERTO RICO 31,870 75.0 0.7 1.3 18.4 4.5 0.2RHODE ISLAND 13,888 58.7 4.4 14.4 10.9 11.6 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 59.5 3.1 6.1 14.6 16.6 0.1SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 39.4 8.2 21.7 19.9 10.6 0.2TENNESSEE 37,179 48.4 3.2 11.7 4.7 32.0 0.0TEXAS 92,372 85.2 2.8 1.8 3.4 6.8 0.0

UTAH 6,175 21.9 17.1 13.2 17.4 28.6 1.6VERMONT 5,880 51.7 11.7 14.6 10.6 11.2 0.1VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 92.1 0.4 1.4 4.3 1.7 0.0VIRGINIA 19,183 74.4 2.7 4.0 8.0 10.9 0.0


TABLE 10:28




PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

HOURS OF PARTICIPATION





of TANF Recipients


EMPLOYED UNEMPLOYED*

NOT IN LABOR

FORCE**

U.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 26.4 49.2 24.3


GEORGIA 28,679 17.4 62.3 20.3GUAM a/ -- -- -- --HAWAII 13,007 39.3 37.0 23.7IDAHO 419 27.8 61.0 11.2




PUERTO RICO 31,870 9.1 61.5 29.4RHODE ISLAND 13,888 27.9 54.0 18.1SOUTH CAROLINA 7,895 21.3 35.6 43.1SOUTH DAKOTA 1,305 20.6 79.4 0.0TENNESSEE 37,179 26.4 64.7 8.9TEXAS 92,372 15.2 45.8 39.0UTAH 6,175 32.2 67.7 0.0VERMONT 5,880 27.7 45.4 26.9VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,077 2.2 87.8 9.9VIRGINIA 19,183 33.5 4.4 62.1


EMPLOYMENT STATUS

NOTES: '*'= UNEMPLOYED, LOOKING FOR WORK. '**'= UNEMPLOYED, NOT LOOKING FOR WORK

(INCLUDES DISCOURAGED WORKERS). 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.

SOURCE: NATIONAL TANF DATAFILE AS OF 5/23/2001 (CONTINUED…..)

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

TABLE 10:29



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS BY EMPLOYMENT STATUS




of TANF Recipients

X-51




of TANF Recipients


EMPLOYEDUNEM-

PLOYED*

NOT IN

LABORFORCE** EMPLOYED

UNEM-PLOYED*

NOT IN

LABORFORCE**

U.S. TOTAL 152,697 25.1 48.8 26.1 1,425,865 26.6 49.3 24.2

ALABAMA 277 11.2 48.6 40.2 8,918 26.2 54.0 19.8ALASKA 1,606 12.3 87.3 0.4 5,604 14.5 85.4 0.0ARIZONA 1,978 4.8 17.2 78.0 18,845 4.0 16.0 80.0ARKANSAS 466 6.9 32.7 60.4 5,765 14.6 41.2 44.2CALIFORNIA 25,504 35.6 39.9 24.5 288,577 34.8 39.3 25.9COLORADO 657 23.5 65.9 10.6 6,410 24.6 69.1 6.2CONNECTICUT 672 27.2 47.5 25.4 18,823 36.0 44.6 19.4DELAWARE 139 27.2 46.3 26.5 3,085 37.5 36.4 26.1DIST. OF COL. 463 28.4 57.5 14.1 12,293 28.9 55.9 15.1FLORIDA 1,268 12.7 9.7 77.5 30,536 27.7 15.1 57.1

GEORGIA 720 23.3 60.9 15.8 27,959 17.2 62.4 20.4GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 1,315 32.4 41.4 26.2 11,691 40.1 36.5 23.4

IDAHO 54 26.4 61.6 12.0 365 28.0 60.9 11.1ILLINOIS 2,035 41.6 58.4 0.0 60,696 41.4 58.6 0.0INDIANA 1,047 18.2 47.6 34.2 25,664 27.9 45.3 26.8IOWA 2,230 31.6 19.7 48.7 11,376 25.4 35.9 38.7KANSAS 1,093 19.6 73.1 7.2 7,912 19.7 51.4 28.9KENTUCKY 2,946 17.5 80.7 1.9 22,041 16.4 71.2 12.4LOUISIANA 520 19.1 47.7 33.2 16,627 19.4 57.8 22.8

MAINE 1,156 27.3 56.9 15.8 7,807 34.2 58.3 7.5MARYLAND 5,148 7.6 92.4 0.0 18,384 6.4 93.6 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 2,510 20.3 21.0 58.7 26,638 17.9 20.2 62.0MICHIGAN 5,992 44.1 21.7 34.2 48,796 41.1 24.4 34.4MINNESOTA 6,304 42.8 48.5 8.7 29,613 34.0 54.9 11.2MISSISSIPPI 112 5.1 28.0 67.0 5,973 14.3 49.7 36.0MISSOURI 2,599 25.8 41.8 32.4 33,615 25.8 39.6 34.6MONTANA 1,003 12.6 87.4 0.0 3,321 15.7 84.3 0.0NEBRASKA 428 14.8 85.2 0.0 6,142 12.2 87.8 0.0NEVADA 333 16.9 70.1 13.0 2,960 14.5 71.0 14.4

NEW HAMPSHIRE 420 20.4 13.7 65.9 3,989 25.9 16.5 57.6NEW JERSEY 933 5.1 85.1 9.9 32,018 12.4 82.3 5.3NEW MEXICO 2,967 30.7 1.1 68.2 18,397 30.0 0.6 69.4NEW YORK 30,872 17.5 62.9 19.6 195,966 20.9 59.0 20.1NORTH CAROLINA 969 11.4 88.6 0.0 22,886 18.0 82.0 0.0NORTH DAKOTA 176 24.4 12.8 62.8 1,867 32.9 5.5 61.7OHIO 5,919 30.0 68.6 1.4 59,245 31.3 60.8 7.9OKLAHOMA 393 16.3 83.7 0.0 8,157 21.8 78.2 0.0OREGON 1,657 25.8 58.9 15.3 10,268 22.6 73.6 3.8PENNSYLVANIA 5,858 15.6 84.4 0.0 57,925 25.2 74.8 0.0

PUERTO RICO 3,124 5.1 29.4 65.5 28,712 9.5 65.0 25.5RHODE ISLAND 887 37.2 44.3 18.6 13,001 27.2 54.7 18.1SOUTH CAROLINA 688 16.1 20.5 63.4 7,207 21.8 37.0 41.2SOUTH DAKOTA 98 17.1 82.9 0.0 1,207 20.9 79.1 0.0TENNESSEE 1,580 21.0 38.8 40.3 35,599 26.7 65.8 7.5TEXAS 10,321 19.6 45.7 34.6 82,051 14.7 45.8 39.5UTAH 498 21.5 78.5 0.0 5,677 33.2 66.8 0.1VERMONT 1,066 28.8 47.1 24.1 4,814 27.4 45.0 27.6

VIRGIN ISLANDS 168 0.8 86.8 12.4 910 2.5 88.0 9.5VIRGINIA 975 24.8 7.3 68.0 18,208 33.9 4.2 61.8

WASHINGTON 9,706 37.3 7.0 55.7 37,994 37.8 5.8 56.4WEST VIRGINIA 2,515 15.9 50.6 33.5 7,747 18.9 54.4 26.7WISCONSIN 300 22.8 77.2 0.0 5,389 15.4 84.6 0.0WYOMING 33 10.8 89.2 0.0 196 14.9 85.1 0.0

EMPLOYMENT STATUSEMPLOYMENT STATUS


TOTALMALESSTATE

TOTALFEMALES

NOTES: '*'= UNEMPLOYED, LOOKING FOR WORK. '**'= UNEMPLOYED, NOT LOOKING FOR WORK (INCLUDES DISCOURAGED

WORKERS). 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.

TABLE 10:29 (cont.)


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF MALE/FEMALE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY EMPLOYMENT STATUS





of TANF Recipients

X-53




of TANF Recipients


0 - 1 2 - 5 6 - 11 12 - 15 16 - 19 UNKNOWN*U.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 13.1 25.6 36.2 17.4 7.6 0.1

ALABAMA 42,831 14.6 24.4 35.9 17.6 7.5 0.0ALASKA 14,927 14.7 24.4 34.9 18.4 7.7 0.0ARIZONA 63,300 11.7 26.1 38.0 17.5 6.6 0.0ARKANSAS 20,241 11.5 29.1 34.5 16.4 7.9 0.7CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 10.2 26.2 37.3 18.6 7.6 0.0COLORADO 21,640 15.4 25.3 35.0 18.1 6.2 0.0CONNECTICUT 47,183 15.0 23.8 34.4 18.3 8.5 0.0DELAWARE 10,411 16.2 25.1 34.6 16.5 6.3 1.3DIST. OF COL. 34,650 13.8 27.5 39.0 12.7 6.0 1.0FLORIDA 119,862 13.4 23.1 35.6 19.1 8.8 0.0

GEORGIA 101,497 14.6 23.9 35.3 18.2 8.0 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 13.7 23.8 35.3 18.7 8.6 0.0

IDAHO 1,889 13.7 23.6 35.5 20.5 6.7 0.0ILLINOIS 200,071 14.4 24.3 37.1 16.5 7.4 0.3INDIANA 68,717 17.1 29.2 34.0 14.7 5.0 0.0IOWA 34,888 16.2 28.2 34.5 15.2 6.0 0.0KANSAS 23,110 20.8 26.3 30.5 15.0 7.4 0.0KENTUCKY 63,471 15.8 25.9 33.2 17.6 7.5 0.0LOUISIANA 55,616 17.8 25.9 33.1 15.9 7.3 0.0



PUERTO RICO 65,436 3.3 25.0 41.6 21.2 7.2 1.7RHODE ISLAND 31,117 13.4 25.2 37.2 17.7 6.4 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 13.8 20.8 36.4 19.0 9.3 0.7SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 11.4 20.7 38.4 20.2 9.3 0.0TENNESSEE 100,002 14.9 26.4 35.5 16.5 6.7 0.0

TEXAS 260,402 16.2 29.9 33.2 15.0 5.7 0.0UTAH 15,855 15.5 27.2 32.8 17.4 7.0 0.0VERMONT 10,194 14.6 27.3 34.6 16.8 6.7 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 9.9 26.1 36.9 19.2 7.8 0.0VIRGINIA 52,365 13.6 26.2 35.6 17.6 7.0 0.0


TABLE 10:30


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY AGE GROUP



AGE OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN

STATE

TOTAL

CHILDREN

NOTE: '*'= INCLUDING UNBORN CHILDREN. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED OR REPORTED IN ERROR.




of TANF Recipients

X-55

0 - 1 2 - 5 6 - 11 12 - 15 16 - 19 UNKNOWN*U.S. TOTAL 2,169,497 13.2 26.2 36.0 17.1 7.4 0.1









AGE OF MALE RECIPIENT CHILDREN


TABLE 10:31



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF MALE RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY AGE GROUP

STATE

MALE

CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients


0 - 1 2 - 5 6 - 11 12 - 15 16 - 19 UNKNOWN*U.S. TOTAL 2,214,718 12.9 25.0 36.4 17.8 7.8 0.1






PUERTO RICO 31,904 3.7 25.6 40.9 21.2 7.0 1.5RHODE ISLAND 15,668 12.7 25.7 37.2 18.1 6.3 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 14,580 12.7 19.7 38.5 19.0 9.4 0.7SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 11.1 20.4 38.8 20.5 9.2 0.0TENNESSEE 51,336 13.9 26.2 36.4 16.6 7.0 0.0TEXAS 128,502 15.9 29.9 33.2 15.3 5.7 0.0UTAH 7,885 15.5 26.3 33.1 18.4 6.7 0.0

VERMONT 5,017 13.6 28.0 34.2 17.1 7.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 1,366 9.7 26.2 37.5 18.5 8.2 0.0VIRGINIA 27,497 13.6 25.9 35.3 17.5 7.7 0.0


TABLE 10:32



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF FEMALE RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY AGE GROUP

AGE OF FEMALE RECIPIENT CHILDREN


STATE

FEMALE

CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients

X-57




of TANF Recipients


STATE

TOTALCHILDREN HISPANIC* WHITE BLACK

AMERICANNATIVE ASIAN HAWAIIAN

MULTI-RACIAL UNKNOWN

U.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 26.8 26.8 40.1 1.6 2.8 0.6 0.0 1.3

ALABAMA 42,831 0.5 22.8 76.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0ALASKA 14,927 3.8 36.3 10.0 43.1 4.7 2.1 0.0 0.0ARIZONA 63,300 42.8 24.8 10.0 21.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.7ARKANSAS 20,241 2.2 29.8 66.7 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 48.0 20.5 22.6 0.3 7.3 1.0 0.0 0.2COLORADO 21,640 39.5 35.3 17.6 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 4.7CONNECTICUT 47,183 42.5 22.2 34.5 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0DELAWARE 10,411 8.9 25.0 63.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1DIST. OF COL. 34,650 1.3 0.1 98.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4FLORIDA 119,862 21.5 23.2 55.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0

GEORGIA 101,497 1.7 16.9 81.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 0.6 8.6 1.3 0.1 7.8 37.6 0.0 43.9IDAHO 1,889 16.1 73.9 1.5 7.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.2ILLINOIS 200,071 9.2 13.3 73.8 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.0 2.5INDIANA 68,717 5.7 40.6 51.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.7IOWA 34,888 5.6 70.4 21.4 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.1KANSAS 23,110 11.2 52.4 33.9 1.6 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.0

KENTUCKY 63,471 0.6 74.3 24.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7LOUISIANA b/ 55,616 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --


NEW HAMPSHIRE 9,391 4.1 91.4 3.9 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW JERSEY 97,127 26.9 11.3 61.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW MEXICO 47,488 62.7 16.0 5.0 16.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0NEW YORK 492,692 38.1 18.6 42.1 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.2NORTH CAROLINA 86,562 4.1 24.0 65.7 2.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 3.2NORTH DAKOTA 5,381 2.8 31.6 2.7 61.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.1

OHIO 180,374 3.3 40.3 56.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0OKLAHOMA 27,642 4.4 34.6 44.4 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0OREGON 30,024 14.7 68.8 9.8 3.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.9PENNSYLVANIA 182,478 13.4 28.6 54.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.5

PUERTO RICO 65,436 99.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3RHODE ISLAND 31,117 29.9 36.6 13.0 0.4 3.9 0.0 0.0 16.2SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 0.9 22.2 75.8 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 0.8 13.2 2.0 83.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 100,002 1.1 32.3 66.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0TEXAS 260,402 53.1 15.8 29.9 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5UTAH 15,855 16.7 66.6 4.1 9.5 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.6VERMONT 10,194 0.4 97.6 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 28.9 0.3 70.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1VIRGINIA 52,365 4.1 26.7 68.6 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY ETHNICITY/RACE

TABLE 10:34



NOTE: '*'= CAN BE OF ANY RACE. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED. 'b/'= DATA REPORTED IN ERROR.




of TANF Recipients

X-59

STATE

TOTAL

CHILDREN YES NOU.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 0.6 99.4

ALABAMA 42,831 0.0 100.0ALASKA 14,927 0.0 100.0ARIZONA 63,300 0.0 100.0ARKANSAS 20,241 0.8 99.2CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 0.3 99.7COLORADO 21,640 0.0 100.0CONNECTICUT 47,183 0.0 100.0DELAWARE 10,411 0.1 99.9DIST. OF COL. 34,650 0.2 99.8FLORIDA 119,862 0.0 100.0

GEORGIA 101,497 0.0 100.0GUAM a/ -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 0.0 100.0IDAHO 1,889 0.0 100.0ILLINOIS 200,071 0.3 99.7INDIANA 68,717 0.0 100.0IOWA 34,888 0.0 100.0KANSAS 23,110 0.0 100.0KENTUCKY 63,471 22.4 77.6LOUISIANA 55,616 0.0 100.0


NEW HAMPSHIRE a/ 9,391 NEW JERSEY 97,127 0.0 100.0NEW MEXICO 47,488 0.0 100.0NEW YORK 492,692 0.0 100.0NORTH CAROLINA 86,562 4.1 95.9NORTH DAKOTA 5,381 0.0 100.0OHIO 180,374 0.0 100.0OKLAHOMA 27,642 0.0 100.0OREGON 30,024 0.1 99.9PENNSYLVANIA 182,478 0.4 99.6

PUERTO RICO 65,436 0.1 99.9RHODE ISLAND 31,117 0.0 100.0SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 0.1 99.9SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 1.0 99.0TENNESSEE 100,002 0.0 100.0TEXAS 260,402 0.0 100.0UTAH 15,855 0.0 100.0VERMONT 10,194 0.0 100.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 0.0 100.0VIRGINIA 52,365 0.0 100.0



TABLE 10:35



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN RECEIVING DISABILITY BENEFITS

NOTE: 'a'= DATA NOT REPORTED.




of TANF Recipients


HEAD OF

HOUSE-HOLD SPOUSE PARENT CHILD

GRAND-CHILD

OTHERRELATED UNRELATED

U.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 0.8 0.0 0.0 86.6 8.1 3.6 0.8

ALABAMA 42,831 0.0 0.0 0.2 72.4 19.4 7.9 0.0ALASKA 14,927 0.0 0.0 0.0 92.8 4.6 2.4 0.2ARIZONA 63,300 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.8 12.6 4.6 0.0ARKANSAS 20,241 0.3 4.7 0.0 73.1 17.7 4.1 0.1CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 0.0 0.0 0.0 91.9 5.9 2.1 0.1COLORADO 21,640 0.0 0.1 0.0 78.4 16.6 4.3 0.6CONNECTICUT 47,183 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.5 12.0 5.5 0.0DELAWARE 10,411 2.6 0.1 0.0 71.9 17.8 6.4 1.3DIST. OF COL. 34,650 0.4 0.0 0.0 87.9 8.6 3.1 0.1FLORIDA 119,862 2.7 0.0 0.0 69.0 0.0 13.0 15.3

GEORGIA 101,497 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.6 18.6 7.8 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.3 8.6 3.0 0.1

IDAHO 1,889 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.2 47.3 16.6 0.0ILLINOIS 200,071 0.1 0.0 0.0 91.8 6.4 1.7 0.0INDIANA 68,717 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.7 8.9 3.3 0.0IOWA 34,888 0.3 0.0 0.0 89.1 7.6 2.5 0.5KANSAS 23,110 0.0 0.0 0.0 82.3 13.0 4.3 0.4KENTUCKY 63,471 0.1 0.2 0.1 87.3 8.5 3.9 0.0LOUISIANA 55,616 0.8 0.0 0.0 81.7 12.1 5.3 0.1



PUERTO RICO 65,436 0.7 0.3 0.1 96.3 1.9 0.7 0.0RHODE ISLAND 31,117 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.3 3.0 0.6 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 0.0 0.1 0.0 67.3 23.5 9.1 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.3 24.1 12.6 0.0TENNESSEE 100,002 0.0 0.0 0.0 83.9 11.4 4.6 0.0TEXAS 260,402 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.5 8.4 2.7 1.4UTAH 15,855 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.4 10.2 5.3 0.0VERMONT 10,194 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.4 4.7 1.9 0.1

VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 0.0 0.0 0.6 89.6 5.8 3.4 0.5VIRGINIA 52,365 0.1 0.2 0.0 74.5 17.4 7.8 0.0



TABLE 10:36



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY RELATIONSHIP TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

STATETOTAL

CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients

X-61

HEAD OF

HOUSEHOLD SPOUSE PARENT CHILD

GRAND-

CHILD

OTHER

RELATED UNRELATEDU.S. TOTAL 1,373,412 2.3 0.0 0.0 62.4 22.7 10.3 2.2


GEORGIA 41,314 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.7 43.1 17.1 0.1GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 3,490 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.7 54.1 18.9 0.3IDAHO 1,217 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 72.9 25.6 0.0




PUERTO RICO 2,428 1.2 0.4 3.0 86.5 3.3 5.6 0.0RHODE ISLAND 4,727 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.8 16.6 3.5 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 14,496 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.2 44.9 17.8 0.1SOUTH DAKOTA 2,563 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.6 50.1 26.3 0.0TENNESSEE 27,404 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.9 39.0 16.0 0.1TEXAS 80,771 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.8 23.0 8.1 4.1UTAH 4,293 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.4 35.7 17.9 0.0VERMONT 1,328 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.2 30.0 11.8 0.0

VIRGIN ISLANDS 366 0.3 0.0 0.0 68.1 24.6 6.8 0.1VIRGINIA 19,065 0.1 0.0 0.0 36.2 43.6 20.1 0.0



RELATIONSHIP TO THE HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD

TABLE 10:37


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN IN CHILD-ONLY CASES BY RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD


TOTAL

CHILDRENSTATE





of TANF Recipients


1 - 6 7 - 9 10 - 11 12 AND MOREU.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 46.1 35.3 12.5 5.5 0.6

ALABAMA 42,831 43.9 36.0 13.5 5.4 1.1ALASKA 14,927 42.7 34.3 14.0 7.1 2.0ARIZONA 63,300 51.2 34.8 11.3 2.4 0.3ARKANSAS 20,241 47.8 33.9 12.2 5.9 0.2CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 41.7 37.7 13.8 6.4 0.4COLORADO 21,640 52.9 34.0 10.0 2.8 0.3CONNECTICUT 47,183 45.2 33.2 13.3 8.1 0.3DELAWARE a/ 10,411 -- -- -- -- --DIST. OF COL. 34,650 42.0 40.9 10.5 5.6 1.1FLORIDA 119,862 39.8 36.4 14.9 7.5 1.4

GEORGIA 101,497 65.0 22.8 8.5 3.2 0.5GUAM a/ -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 32.1 41.0 14.7 11.9 0.3IDAHO 1,889 75.4 14.3 6.9 3.0 0.4ILLINOIS 200,071 44.8 34.6 12.4 6.9 1.3INDIANA 68,717 59.7 29.7 8.6 1.9 0.2IOWA 34,888 47.5 31.4 11.9 5.6 3.6KANSAS 23,110 57.9 27.8 10.0 3.7 0.5KENTUCKY 63,471 67.5 20.6 8.0 3.5 0.4LOUISIANA 55,616 54.0 25.1 7.9 12.7 0.3

MAINE 19,318 75.7 16.0 5.5 2.2 0.6MARYLAND 53,237 38.6 45.6 11.7 3.6 0.5MASSACHUSETTS 70,782 39.8 36.4 15.0 7.8 1.0MICHIGAN 151,412 46.4 35.0 12.4 5.5 0.7MINNESOTA 81,160 58.7 28.9 9.5 2.7 0.1MISSISSIPPI 28,924 44.2 39.5 12.3 3.6 0.4MISSOURI 87,794 49.2 34.1 10.9 5.6 0.3MONTANA 8,638 48.0 31.6 14.5 5.6 0.4NEBRASKA 17,777 23.6 57.2 10.7 5.3 3.2NEVADA 11,152 46.7 34.3 12.5 5.9 0.6

NEW HAMPSHIRE 9,391 50.3 27.5 9.5 3.3 9.4NEW JERSEY 97,127 49.0 35.2 11.5 3.4 0.9NEW MEXICO 47,488 46.2 35.1 12.2 5.3 1.2NEW YORK 492,692 42.4 38.7 12.9 5.9 0.1NORTH CAROLINA 86,562 42.1 39.0 13.3 5.5 0.1NORTH DAKOTA 5,381 53.0 33.7 10.3 2.8 0.2OHIO 180,374 47.5 33.2 13.5 5.0 0.7OKLAHOMA 27,642 52.4 32.2 10.7 4.3 0.4OREGON 30,024 53.4 30.0 11.4 5.0 0.2PENNSYLVANIA a/ 182,478 -- -- -- -- --

PUERTO RICO 65,436 30.2 47.0 15.9 5.8 1.1RHODE ISLAND 31,117 48.3 36.8 11.1 3.5 0.3SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 42.1 38.5 14.4 4.7 0.3SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 40.2 37.6 14.5 7.4 0.3TENNESSEE 100,002 45.0 33.9 12.4 6.4 2.2TEXAS 260,402 52.9 32.2 11.4 3.3 0.2UTAH 15,855 42.9 32.8 13.6 7.1 3.6VERMONT 10,194 63.2 25.6 8.7 2.5 0.1VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 62.8 29.3 7.3 0.5 0.2VIRGINIA 52,365 50.6 35.3 11.4 2.6 0.1


STATE

NOTE: 'a/'= DATA REPORTED BUT NOT RELIABLE.


YEARS OF EDUCATIONNO FORMAL

EDUCATION

TOTAL

CHILDREN

TABLE 10:38



PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY EDUCATIONAL LEVEL




of TANF Recipients

X-63

U.S. CITIZEN ALIEN UNKNOWNU.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 97.6 2.0 0.3

ALABAMA 42,831 100.0 0.0 0.0ALASKA 14,927 97.5 2.5 0.0ARIZONA 63,300 98.8 1.2 0.0ARKANSAS 20,241 99.9 0.0 0.1CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 97.6 2.4 0.0COLORADO 21,640 99.7 0.3 0.0CONNECTICUT 47,183 99.0 1.0 0.0DELAWARE 10,411 99.8 0.2 0.0DIST. OF COL. 34,650 100.0 0.0 0.0FLORIDA 119,862 97.9 2.1 0.0

GEORGIA 101,497 99.7 0.3 0.0GUAM a/ -- -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 99.4 0.6 0.0IDAHO 1,889 99.8 0.2 0.0




PUERTO RICO 65,436 99.8 0.2 0.0RHODE ISLAND 31,117 96.8 3.2 0.0SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 100.0 0.0 0.0SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 100.0 0.0 0.0TENNESSEE 100,002 99.9 0.1 0.0TEXAS 260,402 99.2 0.7 0.0UTAH 15,855 98.5 1.5 0.0

VERMONT 10,194 99.5 0.5 0.0VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 97.1 1.8 1.1VIRGINIA 52,365 99.3 0.7 0.0


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY CITIZENSHIP STATUS


TABLE 10:39



TOTAL

QUALIFIED

STATE





of TANF Recipients


ALL

FAMILIES

ONE

CHILD

TWO

CHILDREN

THREE

CHILDREN

FOUR OR

MOREU.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 98.0 % 24.5 $348.93 $285.24 $355.81 $423.11 $516.27


GEORGIA 53,267 99.6 23.5 225.78 179.42 238.95 283.93 333.64GUAM a/ 2,721 96.3 -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 100.0 26.0 515.95 408.39 515.19 618.01 807.83IDAHO 1,275 100.0 6.2 281.47 281.72 281.70 278.82 282.03


MAINE 10,864 99.3 41.0 385.13 296.78 409.41 513.55 686.96MARYLAND 27,523 99.0 14.4 351.49 263.59 374.55 454.00 559.07MASSACHUSETTS 43,895 99.5 26.9 496.33 446.22 518.26 617.21 741.65MICHIGAN 74,211 96.3 26.4 342.63 268.83 332.53 406.47 513.46MINNESOTA 39,293 99.5 20.5 413.07 333.82 426.85 489.97 602.66MISSISSIPPI a/ 14,970 99.2 a/ 145.57 110.00 140.00 160.00 170.00MISSOURI 46,710 100.0 20.7 244.68 193.90 260.53 305.58 382.25MONTANA 4,555 99.6 20.3 376.28 288.70 385.15 489.22 620.08NEBRASKA 9,444 98.5 18.4 332.39 275.14 348.41 406.72 475.04NEVADA 6,274 97.5 22.2 301.48 267.42 316.63 346.32 423.70

NEW HAMPSHIRE 5,838 97.5 18.6 441.26 412.71 459.39 499.96 577.44


PUERTO RICO 31,812 98.7 26.0 104.37 76.71 99.73 122.59 154.95RHODE ISLAND 16,320 100.0 24.2 441.07 364.48 454.86 536.67 624.45SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 99.9 24.1 150.71 126.19 154.52 189.02 230.68SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 98.8 23.6 284.45 236.75 290.60 332.72 419.88TENNESSEE 53,788 97.0 9.8 173.59 142.88 180.31 216.47 255.79TEXAS 131,162 99.6 20.3 190.08 187.50 162.02 208.48 258.14UTAH 8,409 99.9 17.9 360.01 299.88 375.23 436.26 505.41VERMONT 6,048 99.2 a/ 447.76 394.87 479.02 534.06 620.51VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 98.9 5.7 254.77 163.83 218.71 261.84 351.46

VIRGINIA 31,834 99.1 21.9 239.58 196.05 267.51 325.52 392.87


TABLE 10:40

TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE TO NEEDY FAMILIES - ACTIVE CASES



NO. OFMONTHS

RECEIVED

TANF FAMILIES RECEIVING CASH ASSISTANCE BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN

AVERAGE MONTHLY AMOUNT OF CASH ASSISTANCE

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES PERCENT

NOTE: 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED. ESITMATE WITH AGGREGATE DATA SUBMITTED FOR MISSISSIPPI.




of TANF Recipients

X-65

MONTHLYAVERAGE

MONTHLYAVERAGE

MONTHLYAVERAGE

U.S. TOTAL 2,269,131 22.7 % $579.83 16.2 % $675.16 7.8 % $277.03


GEORGIA 53,267 20.3 365.47 9.1 576.69 12.3 177.96GUAM a/ 2721.0 -- -- -- -- -- --HAWAII 14,705 38.1 624.74 34.2 610.42 5.8 362.98

IDAHO 1,275 10.4 276.27 3.2 427.83 7.9 188.67ILLINOIS 88,493 28.8 693.43 28.1 700.83 0.8 296.02INDIANA 35,714 30.6 636.10 21.8 753.45 11.6 263.02IOWA 19,952 29.1 496.75 24.1 557.31 5.8 173.00KANSAS 12,576 26.4 351.68 13.9 463.24 15.3 188.02KENTUCKY 38,542 67.5 291.56 10.7 386.04 64.3 241.66LOUISIANA 27,820 12.9 544.48 11.9 581.41 1.0 79.55



PUERTO RICO 31,812 9.0 476.99 7.3 552.28 1.8 142.81RHODE ISLAND 16,320 29.7 644.52 23.2 695.01 8.3 363.35SOUTH CAROLINA 16,059 19.3 427.64 9.9 642.02 10.4 182.41SOUTH DAKOTA 2,802 8.4 222.38 4.3 279.27 4.3 157.10TENNESSEE 53,788 30.6 600.54 18.2 782.99 14.0 294.87TEXAS 131,162 15.3 524.79 11.1 636.93 4.9 188.43UTAH 8,409 17.4 542.28 16.7 552.66 1.0 191.61VERMONT 6,048 32.1 535.96 26.1 577.27 7.7 281.56VIRGIN ISLANDS 934 8.3 625.99 5.5 850.93 3.2 156.39VIRGINIA 31,834 18.6 592.04 15.9 669.86 3.0 112.22



TANF FAMILIES WITH INCOME BY TYPE OF NON-TANF INCOME

ALL NON-TANF INCOME EARNED INCOME UNEARNED INCOME

STATETOTAL

FAMILIES PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT


TABLE 10:41






of TANF Recipients


MONTHLYAVERAGE

MONTHLYAVERAGE

MONTHLYAVERAGE

U.S. TOTAL 1,578,598 28.4 % $620.16 23.6 % $667.72 6.4 % $291.36


GEORGIA 28,679 23.3 473.88 16.9 576.51 7.1 184.91a -- -- -- -- -- -- --

HAWAII 13,007 40.9 641.86 39.0 605.02 3.4 777.70

IDAHO 419 23.7 319.72 9.9 426.97 15.8 211.73ILLINOIS 62,732 40.4 690.07 40.0 694.46 0.4 276.55INDIANA 26,710 32.7 714.86 29.1 753.45 4.4 330.60IOWA 13,606 39.0 521.97 36.9 534.31 2.8 217.49KANSAS 9,005 27.0 385.66 19.6 457.32 9.7 147.11KENTUCKY 24,988 58.9 326.21 16.6 384.22 53.1 242.32LOUISIANA 17,147 20.8 544.93 19.4 579.19 1.6 83.09







TANF ADULT RECIPIENTS WITH INCOME BY TYPE OF NON-TANF INCOME

STATE TOTALADULTS

ALL NON-TANF INCOME EARNED INCOME UNEARNED INCOME

PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT


TABLE 10:42






of TANF Recipients

X-67

STATE

TOTAL

CHILDREN

MONTHLY

AVERAGEU.S. TOTAL 4,384,527 2.9 % $166.16

ALABAMA 42,831 0.9 393.50ALASKA 14,927 8.3 108.67ARIZONA 63,300 0.1 231.08ARKANSAS 20,241 1.2 72.83CALIFORNIA 1,008,720 2.6 164.69COLORADO 21,640 1.1 141.72CONNECTICUT 47,183 6.3 157.78DELAWARE 10,411 16.1 110.36DIST. OF COL. 34,650 1.2 242.00FLORIDA 119,862 5.5 110.35

GEORGIA 101,497 6.4 121.78GUAM a/ -- -- --HAWAII 29,107 2.7 157.00

IDAHO 1,889 2.4 106.57ILLINOIS 200,071 0.3 251.01INDIANA 68,717 6.8 151.92IOWA 34,888 2.8 118.70KANSAS 23,110 8.4 121.01KENTUCKY 63,471 22.1 197.81LOUISIANA 55,616 0.0 --

MAINE 19,318 5.5 103.99MARYLAND 53,237 1.3 117.39MASSACHUSETTS 70,782 5.8 146.03MICHIGAN 151,412 1.8 132.08MINNESOTA 81,160 2.7 117.23MISSISSIPPI 28,924 7.6 107.39MISSOURI 87,794 1.7 175.93MONTANA 8,638 0.0 --NEBRASKA 17,777 14.1 115.95

NEVADA 11,152 2.7 147.71NEW HAMPSHIRE 9,391 16.5 190.48NEW JERSEY 97,127 2.1 102.73NEW MEXICO 47,488 0.6 101.92NEW YORK 492,692 2.2 215.06NORTH CAROLINA 86,562 2.9 124.19NORTH DAKOTA 5,381 0.8 98.65OHIO 180,374 0.9 166.33OKLAHOMA 27,642 0.0 --OREGON 30,024 0.2 159.88PENNSYLVANIA 182,478 0.9 190.75

PUERTO RICO 65,436 0.4 102.98RHODE ISLAND 31,117 4.3 286.12SOUTH CAROLINA 29,036 4.5 124.11SOUTH DAKOTA 5,528 1.0 100.12TENNESSEE 100,002 7.4 177.98TEXAS 260,402 0.6 119.08UTAH 15,855 0.0 --VERMONT 10,194 4.5 123.66VIRGIN ISLANDS 2,660 0.0 --VIRGINIA 52,365 1.7 81.11



TABLE 10:43



TANF RECIPIENT CHILDREN WITH UNEARNED INCOME

UNEARNED

INCOME





of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-69




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-71




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-73




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-75




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-77




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-79




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-81

Appendix 10:1

SSP-MOE Recipient Characteristics

AVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 OVER 10 UNKNOWN

ALABAMA 172 4.6 0.0 0.1 31.1 19.3 22.0 27.4 0.1 0.0

CALIFORNIA 63,851 4.7 0.0 0.2 23.4 31.3 20.9 23.1 1.8 0.0

CONNECTICUT 1,567 4.0 3.3 8.7 29.6 28.6 16.9 12.8 0.2 0.0

DELAWARE 107 4.4 0.1 0.9 29.3 28.6 23.8 17.1 0.2 0.1

DIST. OF COL. 130 2.8 6.0 42.4 28.5 14.0 5.0 3.9 0.0 0.3

FLORIDA 1,915 4.0 0.0 1.1 39.3 32.5 16.3 10.8 0.1 0.0

HAWAII 6,501 4.3 0.9 7.9 25.5 25.6 19.9 20.3 0.0 0.0ILLINOIS 908 2.3 57.5 1.2 12.5 19.7 5.6 3.2 0.0 0.2

INDIANA 956 4.4 1.0 2.5 22.7 34.2 22.2 17.2 0.3 0.0

IOWA a/ 1,062 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,680 2.5 15.3 40.6 26.3 11.4 4.1 1.9 0.1 0.4

MARYLAND 1,575 2.9 3.6 46.9 26.2 13.7 6.1 3.3 0.2 0.0

MASSACHUSETTS 81 3.4 1.0 25.0 29.6 25.3 13.5 5.6 0.0 0.0

MISSOURI 2,447 2.5 14.5 43.5 26.1 10.5 3.2 2.1 0.0 0.1

NEBRASKA 830 4.4 1.8 4.6 24.9 29.7 19.3 19.4 0.4 0.0

NEW JERSEY 1,825 4.5 0.0 1.5 29.7 29.6 19.1 19.6 0.8 0.0

NORTH CAROLINA 32 3.2 3.7 30.4 29.3 16.2 17.8 2.6 0.0 0.0

RHODE ISLAND 1,202 3.8 2.2 19.3 26.5 25.3 14.8 11.6 0.4 0.0

TENNESSEE 523 3.8 4.0 16.0 26.6 26.0 14.6 12.5 0.4 0.1

UTAH 114 4.0 5.8 8.5 28.2 27.1 13.3 16.2 1.1 0.1

VIRGINIA 691 4.2 1.7 3.1 29.1 32.8 18.3 14.7 0.1 0.2

WASHINGTON 3,465 4.4 0.5 12.5 23.2 22.7 16.6 22.9 2.4 0.0

WISCONSIN 712 3.4 0.0 36.0 27.5 17.0 8.8 10.3 0.6 0.0


SOURCE: NATIONAL SSP-MOE DATAFILE AS OF 6/20/2001

TABLE 10:55

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE FAMILIES BY NUMBER OF FAMILY MEMBERS

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES

NUMBER OF FAMILY MEMBERS





of TANF Recipients


STATE TOTAL FAMILIES SINGLE-PARENT TWO-PARENT NO-PARENT

ALABAMA 172 0.0 100.0 0.0

CALIFORNIA 63,851 0.0 100.0 0.0

CONNECTICUT 1,567 13.7 86.3 0.0

DELAWARE 107 0.0 100.0 0.0

DIST. OF COL. 130 90.4 1.0 8.6

FLORIDA 1,915 0.0 100.0 0.0

HAWAII 6,501 32.6 65.6 1.9

ILLINOIS 908 59.3 40.5 0.2

INDIANA 956 0.0 100.0 0.0

IOWA 1,062 100.0 0.0 0.0

MAINE 1,680 82.4 3.1 14.5

MARYLAND 1,575 96.0 1.7 2.3

MASSACHUSETTS 81 83.4 16.6 0.0MISSOURI 2,447 75.5 2.7 21.8

NEBRASKA 830 0.0 100.0 0.0

NEW JERSEY 1,825 0.0 100.0 0.0

NORTH CAROLINA 32 84.8 9.4 5.8

RHODE ISLAND 1,202 31.1 68.0 0.9

TENNESSEE 523 0.0 100.0 0.0

UTAH 114 0.0 75.9 24.1

VIRGINIA 691 0.0 100.0 0.0

WASHINGTON 3,465 62.0 37.8 0.3

WISCONSIN 712 94.8 5.2 0.0

TABLE 10:56

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASES


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE FAMILIES BY TYPE OF FAMILIES FOR WORK PARTICIPATION





of TANF Recipients

X-83

AVERAGE 1 2 3 4 5 OR MORE UNKNOWN

ALABAMA 172 2.6 31.1 19.6 21.7 20.8 6.6 0.1

CALIFORNIA 63,851 2.7 23.5 31.4 20.7 12.0 12.2 0.2

CONNECTICUT 1,567 2.3 33.1 31.5 18.9 8.8 6.0 1.8

DELAWARE 107 2.4 29.4 28.7 23.7 11.7 5.7 0.9

DIST. OF COL. 130 1.9 45.5 29.0 14.7 4.9 4.0 1.9

FLORIDA 1,915 2.1 39.3 32.5 16.3 6.4 4.4 1.1

HAWAII 6,501 2.5 28.8 28.3 20.4 12.8 9.1 0.5

ILLINOIS 908 2.0 12.9 19.8 5.8 1.9 1.4 58.1

INDIANA 956 2.5 22.6 34.8 23.4 10.9 7.6 0.6

IOWA 1,062 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,680 1.8 47.9 28.0 12.2 3.9 1.4 6.7

MARYLAND 1,575 1.9 49.7 26.3 13.1 5.2 3.1 2.6

MASSACHUSETTS 81 2.2 28.8 33.3 23.8 10.1 1.9 2.1MISSOURI 2,447 1.8 50.1 29.2 12.0 3.4 2.2 3.1

NEBRASKA 830 2.5 28.0 29.7 19.3 9.7 10.0 3.4

NEW JERSEY 1,825 2.5 29.7 29.6 19.1 10.4 9.8 1.5

NORTH CAROLINA 32 2.2 29.3 35.6 20.9 10.5 3.7 0.0

RHODE ISLAND 1,202 2.1 39.2 29.5 16.7 6.8 5.9 2.0

TENNESSEE 523 2.4 30.1 31.7 19.8 9.0 7.6 1.8

UTAH 114 2.5 29.9 32.9 16.2 10.8 9.8 0.3

VIRGINIA 691 2.3 30.8 33.7 19.5 9.3 5.8 0.9

WASHINGTON 3,465 2.9 19.2 28.0 22.3 14.5 15.4 0.4

WISCONSIN 712 2.4 36.6 28.5 16.3 8.5 10.1 0.0


STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES


TABLE 10:57


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE FAMILIES BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients


STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES HISPANIC* WHITE BLACK

AMERICAN

NATIVE ASIAN HAWAIIAN

MULTI-

RACIAL UNKNOWN

ALABAMA 172 1.0 73.5 24.8 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0CALIFORNIA 63,851 23.0 35.9 4.8 0.4 34.5 1.2 0.2 0.0

CONNECTICUT 1,567 39.5 39.4 16.7 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0 2.3

DELAWARE 107 12.0 55.0 31.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2

DIST. OF COL. 130 0.5 0.2 98.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.8

FLORIDA 1,915 52.3 31.8 15.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0

HAWAII 6,501 0.8 10.4 0.7 0.0 17.8 31.8 0.0 38.6

ILLINOIS 908 3.5 47.5 44.2 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.8 0.3

INDIANA 956 7.3 76.0 14.5 0.1 0.7 0.0 1.1 0.3

IOWA 1,062 2.7 82.7 12.5 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.1

MAINE 1,680 0.6 94.8 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.3

MARYLAND 1,575 1.0 33.7 61.0 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.0 3.1

MASSACHUSETTS 81 17.1 33.2 49.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

MISSOURI 2,447 0.7 79.7 19.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

NEBRASKA 830 13.0 60.0 15.7 10.2 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

NEW JERSEY 1,825 32.7 32.2 30.2 0.1 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 32 5.8 14.1 75.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.5 2.1

RHODE ISLAND 1,202 29.1 45.8 8.8 0.2 7.0 0.0 0.0 9.2

TENNESSEE 523 7.4 48.1 29.4 0.6 4.6 9.9 0.1 0.0

UTAH 114 1.5 62.2 9.3 22.5 1.0 0.0 0.1 3.4

VIRGINIA 691 5.8 67.2 23.5 0.4 2.9 0.3 0.0 0.0

WASHINGTON 3,465 37.7 17.3 5.0 0.4 25.4 3.4 0.0 10.7

WISCONSIN 712 10.2 26.8 42.1 0.8 12.9 0.0 0.0 7.3

NOTE: '*'= CAN BE OF ANY RACE.



TABLE 10:58

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE FAMILIES BY ETHNICITY/RACE




of TANF Recipients

X-85

STATE

TOTAL

FAMILIES

MEDICAL

ASSISTANCE FOOD STAMPS

SUBSIDIZED

HOUSING

SUBSIDIZED

CHILD CARE

ALABAMA 172 91.7 74.0 7.1 0.2

CALIFORNIA 63,851 100.0 96.5 22.9 1.9

CONNECTICUT 1,567 97.7 85.5 15.3 9.8

DELAWARE 107 100.0 91.7 9.5 22.6

DIST. OF COL. 130 99.5 95.9 37.3 36.0

FLORIDA 1,915 100.0 91.6 5.2 76.7

HAWAII 6,501 100.0 90.8 9.9 4.2

ILLINOIS 908 99.8 75.4 0.0 0.5

INDIANA 956 99.9 97.2 8.4 4.9

IOWA 1,062 89.2 -- -- --

MAINE 1,680 100.0 87.8 7.9 0.0

MARYLAND 1,575 100.0 93.4 32.0 0.1

MASSACHUSETTS 81 81.6 37.0 0.0 3.4

MISSOURI 2,447 100.0 66.7 21.9 3.1

NEBRASKA 830 100.0 88.4 1.4 --

NEW JERSEY 1,825 87.3 89.8 13.8 11.6

NORTH CAROLINA 32 70.7 52.4 71.7 47.6

RHODE ISLAND 1,202 100.0 95.5 19.2 7.4

TENNESSEE 523 100.0 89.4 3.2 16.3

UTAH 114 100.0 96.7 0.0 30.2

VIRGINIA 691 100.0 87.4 0.0 8.4WASHINGTON 3,465 99.3 100.0 0.0 a/

WISCONSIN 712 99.2 88.1 16.4 19.6


TABLE 10:59


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE FAMILIES RECEIVING ASSISTANCE






of TANF Recipients


UNDER 20 20 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 OVER 49 UNKNOWNALABAMA 345 1.9 32.8 38.9 22.0 4.4 0.0

CALIFORNIA 128,088 2.0 20.6 34.4 32.8 10.0 0.0

CONNECTICUT 2,708 7.3 44.3 33.6 12.3 2.5 0.0

DELAWARE 213 9.1 46.6 31.9 9.7 1.0 1.7

DIST. OF COL. 121 1.8 12.5 42.0 35.6 6.8 1.3

FLORIDA 3,830 3.0 29.6 40.3 21.2 5.9 0.0

HAWAII 11,751 4.2 38.1 34.4 17.3 5.9 0.0

ILLINOIS 1,278 16.2 34.9 33.9 12.5 2.4 0.2

INDIANA 1,804 3.0 49.4 35.7 10.1 1.8 0.0

IOWA 1,028 10.2 54.7 25.2 8.8 1.2 0.0

MAINE 1,517 4.9 40.9 37.5 13.6 3.0 0.0

MARYLAND 1,652 1.1 12.3 29.5 32.9 24.1 0.0

MASSACHUSETTS 102 5.7 31.1 44.2 17.1 1.9 0.1MISSOURI 1,978 1.2 18.5 41.5 30.4 8.5 0.0

NEBRASKA 1,620 6.3 46.9 32.1 12.0 2.7 0.1

NEW JERSEY 3,650 4.4 32.4 34.9 21.3 7.0 0.0

NORTH CAROLINA 31 2.1 52.7 37.2 8.0 0.0 0.0

RHODE ISLAND 2,008 11.3 40.6 29.2 12.5 6.3 0.0

TENNESSEE 762 3.0 43.4 35.1 15.3 3.1 0.0

UTAH 172 2.6 30.6 38.1 22.6 6.1 0.0

VIRGINIA 1,307 4.9 51.7 30.3 11.5 1.7 0.0

WASHINGTON 5,205 1.1 23.1 37.4 26.1 12.4 0.0

WISCONSIN 749 1.1 18.5 42.3 31.2 6.9 0.0


TABLE 10:60

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY AGE GROUP

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

AGE OF ADULT RECIPIENTS





of TANF Recipients

X-87

SINGLE MARRIED SEPARATED WIDOWED DIVORCED

ALABAMA 345 3.4 93.6 1.8 0.0 1.3CALIFORNIA 128,088 14.8 83.9 0.3 0.1 0.9CONNECTICUT 2,708 45.1 48.0 4.5 0.1 2.3DELAWARE 213 35.8 55.7 6.1 0.0 2.4DIST. OF COL. 121 88.5 7.3 3.1 0.2 0.8FLORIDA 3,830 16.8 79.3 1.7 0.2 2.1HAWAII 11,751 31.7 60.9 5.4 0.4 1.6ILLINOIS 1,278 39.1 59.5 0.4 0.0 1.0INDIANA 1,804 18.9 74.4 2.6 0.1 4.0IOWA 1,028 -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,517 59.7 23.2 6.6 0.2 10.4MARYLAND 1,652 51.8 16.7 18.7 1.8 10.9MASSACHUSETTS 102 67.4 22.8 5.9 0.0 3.9MISSOURI 1,978 36.3 19.1 17.7 1.3 25.6NEBRASKA 1,620 98.7 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0NEW JERSEY 3,650 36.7 59.9 2.5 0.1 0.7NORTH CAROLINA 31 75.5 7.4 6.9 0.0 10.1RHODE ISLAND 2,008 47.1 48.0 3.7 0.2 1.0TENNESSEE 762 22.7 63.3 8.8 0.8 4.5UTAH 172 7.4 89.0 2.3 0.0 1.3

VIRGINIA 1,307 19.9 73.2 2.9 0.2 3.8WASHINGTON 5,205 20.8 60.8 10.1 1.8 5.5WISCONSIN 749 43.9 20.3 14.5 2.1 19.2


STATETOTAL

ADULTSMARITAL STATUS

TABLE 10:61

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY MARITAL STATUS





of TANF Recipients


1 - 6 7 - 9 10 - 11 12

MORE

THAN 12 UNKNOWN

ALABAMA 345 0.6 3.0 21.8 24.6 40.2 9.9 0.0CALIFORNIA 128,088 8.1 16.0 9.7 17.8 44.8 3.5 0.0CONNECTICUT 2,708 0.4 3.9 15.1 23.2 50.1 7.4 0.0DELAWARE 213 -- -- -- -- -- -- --DIST. OF COL. 121 0.4 0.5 9.3 24.6 64.1 1.1 0.0FLORIDA 3,830 1.5 11.0 9.6 27.9 32.4 2.0 15.7HAWAII 11,751 0.1 7.5 7.2 16.4 64.2 4.5 0.0ILLINOIS 1,278 0.0 3.7 7.3 27.9 56.7 4.4 0.0INDIANA 1,804 1.1 1.2 14.3 26.1 56.4 0.9 0.0IOWA 1,028 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,517 6.7 0.6 5.8 11.7 53.8 21.3 0.0

MARYLAND 1,652 0.0 1.8 13.0 38.8 43.2 3.2 0.0MASSACHUSETTS 102 2.1 0.7 4.7 39.7 47.9 4.8 0.0MISSOURI 1,978 0.0 1.5 17.9 29.3 45.3 6.0 0.0NEBRASKA 1,620 0.0 3.3 2.8 6.2 86.2 1.4 0.0NEW JERSEY 3,650 0.8 7.3 23.0 13.8 48.3 6.9 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 31 0.0 0.0 10.1 12.2 64.4 13.3 0.0RHODE ISLAND 2,008 5.9 4.9 18.8 27.3 41.0 2.0 0.0TENNESSEE 762 9.6 7.5 15.0 21.3 44.3 2.3 0.0UTAH 172 2.3 25.7 5.9 11.2 51.3 3.6 0.0

VIRGINIA 1,307 1.5 2.0 15.6 28.1 50.2 2.6 0.0WASHINGTON 5,205 26.5 21.4 10.2 9.7 25.4 6.7 0.0WISCONSIN 749 7.6 6.2 11.4 28.9 45.1 0.8 0.0


TABLE 10:62

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY EDUCATION LEVEL


STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

NO

FORMALEDUCA-

TION

YEARS OF EDUCATION




of TANF Recipients

X-89

REQUIRED

CHILD

UNDER 12

MONTHS

SANCTION/

WAIVER

TRIBAL

WORK

DISABLED/

EXEMPT

TEEN

PARENT IN

EDUCA-

TION

NOT

APPLI-

CABLE

ALABAMA 345 76.0 14.6 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0

CALIFORNIA 128,088 87.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 12.5 0.2 0.0

CONNECTICUT 2,708 69.9 0.0 9.5 0.0 20.1 0.5 0.0

DELAWARE 213 96.3 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0

DIST. OF COL. 121 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 98.9 0.1 0.0

FLORIDA 3,830 72.3 14.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0

HAWAII 11,751 68.7 21.3 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0

ILLINOIS 1,278 99.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0

INDIANA 1,804 34.5 2.0 47.3 0.0 12.1 4.1 0.0

IOWA 1,028 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,517 85.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 7.7 5.9 0.0

MARYLAND 1,652 28.3 2.7 0.0 0.0 68.7 0.3 0.0

MASSACHUSETTS 102 19.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 67.9 9.3 0.0

MISSOURI 1,978 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.4 0.2 0.1

NEBRASKA 1,620 77.5 15.4 1.2 0.2 4.2 1.5 0.0

NEW JERSEY 3,650 79.6 0.0 6.7 0.0 13.5 0.1 0.0

NORTH CAROLINA 31 80.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 3.7 13.8

RHODE ISLAND 2,008 82.6 3.0 7.1 0.0 5.1 2.2 0.0

TENNESSEE 762 82.7 3.3 12.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.0

UTAH 172 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

VIRGINIA 1,307 76.3 0.0 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

WASHINGTON 5,205 81.4 1.1 0.0 0.0 8.9 8.6 0.0

WISCONSIN 749 63.8 0.8 8.6 0.0 1.1 25.7 0.0SOURCE: NATIONAL SSP-MOE DATAFILE AS OF 6/20/2001

TOTAL

ADULTSSTATE

WORK EXEMPTION STATUS

TABLE 10:63


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENTS BY WORK EXEMPTION STATUS





of TANF Recipients


NO YES

UNSUB-SIDIZED

EMPLOY-

MENT

WORK

PREPAR-

ATION**

JOB

SEARCH

JOBTRAINING/

EDUCA-

TION

OTHER

WORK

ACTIVITIES

ALABAMA 345 75.0 25.0 16.4 3.2 3.5 4.1 0.6

CALIFORNIA 128,088 49.6 50.4 42.7 1.5 3.7 4.0 0.4

CONNECTICUT 2,708 60.7 39.3 30.1 0.7 9.6 4.6 0.0

DELAWARE 213 65.4 34.6 29.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.0

DIST. OF COL. 121 98.7 1.3 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

FLORIDA 3,830 63.3 36.7 27.7 5.4 2.3 5.1 0.4

HAWAII 11,751 58.4 41.6 39.8 0.9 1.1 0.6 0.0

ILLINOIS 1,278 38.3 61.7 13.7 3.2 0.3 54.4 1.2

INDIANA 1,804 48.2 51.8 47.3 0.4 1.8 2.1 6.0

IOWA 1,028 -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,517 62.1 37.9 30.4 5.4 2.7 2.8 0.8

MARYLAND 1,652 93.6 6.4 3.1 0.8 1.4 1.8 0.0

MASSACHUSETTS 102 62.7 37.3 37.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0

MISSOURI 1,978 94.6 5.4 1.3 0.2 1.0 0.4 2.9

NEBRASKA 1,620 57.7 42.3 26.4 0.3 6.6 6.8 7.2

NEW JERSEY 3,650 61.8 38.2 18.6 13.6 6.7 12.2 0.0

NORTH CAROLINA 31 4.8 95.2 78.7 13.3 8.5 5.3 0.0

RHODE ISLAND 2,008 72.0 28.0 21.7 0.3 1.4 4.9 0.7

TENNESSEE 762 57.0 43.0 13.7 0.9 0.8 19.8 11.7

UTAH 172 30.0 70.0 8.7 9.6 4.0 46.3 19.6

VIRGINIA 1,307 67.0 33.0 23.8 2.1 1.1 1.4 0.0

WASHINGTON 5,205 41.1 58.9 31.6 21.5 2.7 4.1 12.6

WISCONSIN 749 10.1 89.9 5.8 46.9 9.4 72.6 0.0

'**'= SUBSIDIZED JOBS, ON-THE-JOB TRAINING, WORK EXPERIENCE, OR COMMUNITY SERVICES.


NOTES: '*'= SOME PARTICIPATED IN 2 OR 3 WORK ACTIVITIES.


TABLE 10:64


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENTS PARTICIPATING IN WORK ACTIVITIES*

WORK PARTICIPATION? TYPE OF WORK PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES

TOTAL

ADULTSSTATE




of TANF Recipients

X-91

EMPLOYED

NOT

EMPLOYED*

NOT IN LABOR

FORCE**

ALABAMA 345 17.9 62.1 20.0

CALIFORNIA 128,088 43.5 39.3 17.2

CONNECTICUT 2,708 37.0 49.5 13.5

DELAWARE 213 39.1 54.8 6.0

DIST. OF COL. 121 1.4 0.8 97.8

FLORIDA 3,830 27.8 12.2 59.9

HAWAII 11,751 41.8 42.5 15.7

ILLINOIS 1,278 13.9 86.1 0.0INDIANA 1,804 30.2 43.5 26.3

IOWA 1,028 -- -- --

MAINE 1,517 19.7 56.0 24.3

MARYLAND 1,652 3.5 96.5 0.0

MASSACHUSETTS 102 36.4 24.0 39.7

MISSOURI 1,978 3.7 21.3 75.0

NEBRASKA 1,620 22.9 77.1 0.0

NEW JERSEY 3,650 14.0 80.5 5.5

NORTH CAROLINA 31 89.4 10.6 0.0

RHODE ISLAND 2,008 19.3 64.1 16.5

TENNESSEE 762 22.1 62.4 15.5UTAH 172 10.9 89.1 0.0

VIRGINIA 1,307 39.5 7.6 52.9

WASHINGTON 5,205 32.4 8.2 59.4

WISCONSIN 749 8.6 91.4 0.0

WASHINGTON 5,191 33.6 7.7 58.7

WISCONSIN 744 8.8 91.2 0.0


TABLE 10:65


PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE ADULT RECIPIENT BY EMPLOYMENT STATUS


EMPLOYMENT STATUS

'**'= UNEMPLOYED, NOT LOOKING FOR WORK.

STATE

TOTAL

ADULTS

NOTES: '*'= UNEMPLOYED, LOOKING FOR WORK.




of TANF Recipients


0 -1 2 - 5 6 - 11 12 - 15 16 - 19 UNKNOWN

ALABAMA 443 15.1 24.3 34.4 19.7 6.5 0.0

CALIFORNIA 173,128 9.1 22.0 36.6 21.5 10.7 0.0

CONNECTICUT 3,488 22.0 28.1 32.7 12.4 4.7 0.0

DELAWARE 254 24.5 30.0 28.5 12.2 2.8 1.9

DIST. OF COL. 248 7.3 20.3 40.0 20.2 10.9 1.3

FLORIDA 3,908 17.5 26.0 33.3 16.8 6.4 0.0

HAWAII 16,168 16.7 27.5 32.8 15.8 7.2 0.0

ILLINOIS 775 11.1 29.6 31.7 18.0 9.2 0.4

INDIANA 2,385 23.2 32.3 31.6 10.1 2.8 0.0

IOWA a/ -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 2,756 9.9 24.4 37.5 19.5 8.7 0.0

MARYLAND 2,841 7.9 18.2 38.9 23.5 11.5 0.1

MASSACHUSETTS 177 13.5 21.6 33.5 21.6 9.8 0.0

MISSOURI 4,168 4.3 15.8 39.4 28.5 12.1 0.0

NEBRASKA 1,997 25.0 28.2 30.6 11.5 4.7 0.0

NEW JERSEY 4,492 17.4 25.4 34.0 16.7 6.5 0.0NORTH CAROLINA 72 13.1 28.1 37.9 12.2 6.6 2.1

RHODE ISLAND 2,513 22.9 26.5 32.3 13.4 4.8 0.0

TENNESSEE 1,213 20.2 28.2 32.5 13.8 5.2 0.0

UTAH 285 15.3 26.2 31.6 18.4 8.5 0.0

VIRGINIA 1,563 23.7 32.5 29.9 10.2 3.6 0.0

WASHINGTON 10,175 11.1 21.2 36.8 19.9 0.9 0.0

WISCONSIN 1,682 5.5 17.5 38.2 27.4 1.3 0.0



TABLE 10:66

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESPERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE RECIPIENT CHILDREN BY AGE GROUP

STATE

TOTAL

CHILDREN

AGE OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN





of TANF Recipients

X-93

ALL FAMILIES 1 CHILD 2 CHILDREN 3 CHILDREN 4 OR MORE

ALABAMA 172 91.6% 189.04 153.58 186.28 209.14 215.61CALIFORNIA 63,851 96.8 535.78 438.50 481.43 549.96 690.50CONNECTICUT 1,567 99.9 574.24 477.46 560.08 619.77 795.29DELAWARE 107 98.5 310.83 271.85 280.77 338.40 393.20DIST. OF COL. 130 100.0 351.08 287.19 351.77 436.34 559.56FLORIDA 1,915 100.0 302.36 268.26 302.26 330.66 392.42HAWAII 6,501 100.0 527.32 419.27 481.23 554.35 708.26ILLINOIS 908 93.2 249.23 314.75 307.14 361.77 278.53INDIANA 956 74.2 319.65 258.79 298.75 336.97 420.62IOWA 1,062 -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,680 99.5 390.98 308.00 437.21 538.14 731.92MARYLAND 1,575 99.7 363.70 300.95 378.61 475.72 570.13MASSACHUSETTS 81 74.0 1,923.00 1,952.27 1,859.78 1,934.43 1,979.08MISSOURI 2,447 100.0 317.11 244.69 337.45 470.95 621.67NEBRASKA 830 99.5 460.06 359.29 432.21 506.65 631.76NEW JERSEY 1,825 99.5 442.18 418.17 429.10 453.96 487.02

NORTH CAROLINA 32 84.8 483.68 512.09 419.19 412.41 661.42RHODE ISLAND 1,202 100.0 498.10 399.93 502.27 578.41 720.20TENNESSEE 523 94.1 216.41 166.49 211.27 238.50 299.39UTAH 114 100.0 465.90 421.18 472.43 477.00 515.35

VIRGINIA 691 98.1 338.72 268.28 335.41 387.97 430.36WASHINGTON 3,465 100.0 90.38 95.66 85.41 84.01 96.21WISCONSIN 712 100.0 578.48 577.49 574.63 586.60 579.17


TABLE 10:67

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESSSP-MOE FAMILIES RECEIVING CASH ASSISTANCE AND AVERAGE MONTHLY AMOUNT BY NUMBER OF RECIPIENT CHILDREN


TOTAL

FAMILIES

CASH

ASSISTANCESTATE

AVERAGE MONTHLY AMOUNT




of TANF Recipients


PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGE PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGE PERCENT

MONTHLY

AVERAGEALABAMA 172 26.7 978.75 22.1 1,058.91 5.8 474.84CALIFORNIA 63,851 64.7 1,431.34 64.3 98.59 8.7 3,628.50CONNECTICUT 1,567 60.8 815.95 50.8 881.68 20.8 205.70DELAWARE 107 51.5 1,188.32 48.0 85.96 11.8 1,958.76DIST. OF COL. 130 8.9 463.14 1.6 553.36 7.6 423.96FLORIDA 1,915 34.9 678.78 26.6 726.15 10.6 415.18HAWAII 6,501 65.3 840.99 59.1 829.52 10.0 492.34ILLINOIS 908 18.0 1,145.54 17.8 1,154.41 0.2 269.28INDIANA 956 57.4 1,084.89 51.6 1,111.05 10.4 475.08IOWA a/ 1,062 -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 1,680 26.7 445.76 17.5 589.12 10.0 158.13MARYLAND 1,575 4.9 947.82 3.2 42.99 2.5 990.80MASSACHUSETTS 81 77.7 943.00 46.5 1,026.33 40.3 634.49MISSOURI 2,447 12.2 502.56 2.8 695.72 9.6 436.17NEBRASKA 830 31.9 856.13 22.3 977.87 11.4 476.41

NEW JERSEY 1,825 29.7 690.03 27.2 714.64 2.9 368.86NORTH CAROLINA 32 78.5 1,300.20 74.3 1,327.97 8.4 403.62RHODE ISLAND 1,202 36.0 672.63 30.4 697.24 7.2 416.41TENNESSEE 523 37.5 832.98 29.4 864.49 10.4 555.82UTAH 114 19.9 562.32 15.3 640.09 4.8 286.32

VIRGINIA 691 49.2 1,014.25 48.0 1,032.70 1.8 218.52WASHINGTON 3,465 63.6 963.46 42.4 1,021.07 30.9 578.94WISCONSIN 712 25.3 693.90 7.4 752.92 18.8 637.83



STATE

TABLE 10:68

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - ACTIVE CASESSSP-MOE FAMILIES WITH INCOME BY TYPE OF NON-SSP INCOME


ALL NON-SSP INCOMES EARNED INCOME UNEARNED INCOME

TOTAL

FAMILIES




of TANF Recipients

X-95

EMPLOY-MENT

MAR-RIAGE

WORKSANCTION

OTHERSANCTION

STATEPOLICY

FAILURE

TO COOP-ERATE*

TRIBALPROGRAM

VOLUN-

TARYCLOSURE OTHER

ALABAMA 328 30.8 0.0 9.8 0.3 12.5 25.0 6.4 0.0 15.2

CALIFORNIA 59,843 34.7 0.0 1.0 3.5 12.3 19.1 29.4 0.0 0.0

CONNECTICUT 3,060 31.4 0.0 2.6 0.0 22.7 2.6 0.0 3.6 37.1

DELAWARE 180 28.9 0.0 33.3 2.8 2.2 13.3 0.0 0.0 19.4

DIST. OF COL. 274 5.1 0.0 0.7 0.4 5.5 12.0 0.0 1.5 74.8

FLORIDA 9,232 36.4 0.0 37.3 0.8 4.1 8.4 5.2 0.0 7.9

HAWAII 3,791 20.2 0.0 2.5 5.7 20.7 30.4 5.7 0.0 14.7

ILLINOIS 490 71.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 2.3 15.0 0.2 0.7 10.0

INDIANA 1,424 24.9 0.4 3.0 8.1 5.0 24.9 6.0 0.0 27.7IOWA a/ 103 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

MAINE 621 34.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 17.7 19.3 0.0 8.9 20.0

MARYLAND 835 0.7 0.0 9.5 0.4 36.3 25.1 5.9 0.0 22.2

MASSACHUSETTS 112 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 2.2 0.0 8.6 80.7

MISSOURI 1,196 7.9 0.6 0.0 1.0 34.8 3.3 0.0 8.1 44.2

NEBRASKA 2,249 57.8 0.0 13.5 0.0 2.8 6.1 0.0 6.6 13.2NEW JERSEY 2,871 25.8 0.0 6.6 0.1 8.1 8.7 1.7 0.0 49.1

NORTH CAROLINA 19 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.3 31.3

RHODE ISLAND 581 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 36.8 0.0 12.4 27.0

TENNESSEE 743 29.3 0.0 9.6 0.0 6.6 1.6 2.7 9.0 41.2

UTAH 317 51.7 0.3 30.3 0.0 2.8 6.0 0.0 6.0 2.8

VIRGINIA 1,167 19.5 0.0 0.0 14.1 12.3 16.4 21.9 0.0 15.8

WASHINGTON 4,333 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 48.8 8.8 0.0 8.0

WISCONSIN 934 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 69.5

TABLE 10:69

SEPARATE STATE PROGRAM - MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT - CLOSED CASES

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION OF SSP-MOE CLOSED CASE FAMILIES BY REASON FOR CLOSURE


NOTES: '*'= FAILURE TO COOPERATE WITH ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. 'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED.

'a/'= DATA NOT REPORTED.


REASON FOR CLOSURE

STATETOTAL

FAMILIES




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-97

Appendix 10:2

Reliability of Estimates

All States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands were required tosubmit TANF data on the demographic characteristics and financial circumstances of familiesreceiving assistance and families no longer receiving assistance under their TANF program.During FY 2000, all 54 States and Territories transmitted 8,391,790 active cases and 649,794closed cases onto the national TANF database. Under the TANF data reporting system, Stateshave the option to submit either sample data or universe data to DHHS. Twenty-four Statessubmitted sample data. The remaining 30 States submitted universe data, from which DHHSrandomly selected approximately 275 active cases and 100 closed cases each month. A total probability sample of 198,415 active cases and 54,340 closed cases was used in the TANF

recipient characteristics study for FY 2000.

The statistical data are estimates derived from samples and, therefore, are subject to samplingerrors as well as nonsampling errors. Sampling errors occur to the extent that the results wouldhave been different if obtained from a complete enumeration of all cases. Nonsampling errorsare errors in response or coding of responses and nonresponse errors or incomplete sampleframes.

Standard (Sampling) Errors

For FY 2000, the average monthly caseload, annual sample sizes, average monthly sample sizes,

sampling fractions and the percentage points by which estimates of the total caseload for eachState might vary from the true value at the 95 percent confidence level are shown in Table 10:70and 10:71.

Table 10:72 indicates the approximate standard error for various percentages for the U.S. totalcaseload. These standard errors are somewhat overstated because they are calculated assuming asample of 14,855 cases out of a total of 2,269,131 cases or 0.65466546 percent of the averagemonthly caseload. California is the State with such a small sampling fraction. To obtain the 95 percent confidence level at each percent in Table 10:71, multiply the standard error by a factor of 1.96.

For example, national estimates of 50 percent should not vary from the true value by more than plus or minus 0.8036 percentage points (0.41 x 1.96) at the 95 percent confidence level. Toobtain the 99 percent confidence level, multiply the standard errors by a factor of 2.58.




of TANF Recipients


Nonsampling Errors

Every effort is made to assure that a list of the universe or the sample frame is complete. It is possible, however, that some cases receiving assistance for the reporting month are not included.There is no measure of the completeness of the universe.

Data entries are based on information in the case records. Errors may have occurred because of misinterpretation of questions and because of incomplete case record information. Errors mayalso have occurred in coding and transmitting the data. There are no measures of the reliabilityof the coded information. For some data elements, obviously incorrect or missing informationwas recoded as unknown in the data processing.

Standard Errors of Subsets

For tables based on subsets of the populations, e.g., one-adult or two-adult families, theapproximate standard errors can be computed by the following method: (a) determine theassumed sample size of the subset by multiplying the number of cases in the subset by0.0065466546; (b) divide the sample size of all families (14,855) by the assumed sample size of the subset; and (c) take the square root of the result and multiply it by the standard errors of thetotal caseload shown in Table 10:71.

For example, for child-only cases the approximate standard errors of percentages can be found by multiplying the data in Table 10:71 by the square root of 14,855/5,117 or 2.9031. The samplesize of 5,117 is determined by 781,546 x 0.0065466546.

Standard Errors for State Estimates

The method used above can be adapted to calculating standard errors of State estimates. First,

divide the national sample size of all families (14,855) by the State sample size shown in Table10:69. Then take the square root of the result and multiply it by the standard errors shown inTable 10:71. For example, for Florida the approximate standard errors of percentages can befound by multiplying the data in Table 10:71 by the square root of 14,855/3,275 or 2.1298.

Statistically Significant Differences

Table 10:72 shows the percentage values at which differences between national and Stateestimates become significant at the five percent confidence level based on annual State samplesof 3,000 active cases.

Table 10:73 shows the percentage values at which differences between State estimates becomesignificant at the five- percent confidence level based on annual State samples of 3,000 activecases.




of TANF Recipients

X-99




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-101




of TANF Recipients





of TANF Recipients

X-103

Health and Human Services: chapter10

Documents

Transcript of Health and Human Services: chapter10