HCV: Re-treatment of DAA Failuress3.gi.org/meetings/na2016/16ACG_Hep_School_Southern_0007.pdf · 24...
Transcript of HCV: Re-treatment of DAA Failuress3.gi.org/meetings/na2016/16ACG_Hep_School_Southern_0007.pdf · 24...
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
HCV: Re-treatment of DAA Failures
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACGProfessor of Medicine
Medical Director, Liver TransplantCedars Sinai Medical Center
• GT1 HCV–infected pts with and without cirrhosis previously treated with 8 or 12 wks of LDV/SOF ± RBV or LDV/SOF + GS-9669
Retreatment with longer therapy:24 weeks SOF/LED
Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract O005. Previous Tx
Duration
100
80
60
40
20
0
SV
R12
(%
)
All No Yes
71 6874
15/22
14/19
No Yes8 Wks 12 WksCirrhosis BL NS5A RAVs
80
4660
100
24/30
5/11
11/11
18/30n/N =
29/41
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 1 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
24 Wks of LDV/SOF After Failure of LDV/ SOF-Based Tx: Effect of Baseline RAVs
NS5B variants emerged during retreatment in 33% of pts (4/12) with virologic failure – S282T: n = 2; L159F: n = 1; S282T + L159F: n = 1
Lawitz E, et al. EASL 2015. Abstract O005.
SVR12 by Baseline NS5A RAVs, n/N (%) LDV/SOF for 24 Wks
Number of RAVs
0 11/11 (100)
1 11/16 (69)
≥2 7/14 (50)
Single NS5A RAV
Q30R or M28T 5/5 (100)
L31M 4/5 (80)
Y93H/N 2/6 (33)
DAA Salvage: Triple Combination• Sofosbuvir (SOF)1,2
–Potent antiviral activity against HCV GT 1–6• Velpatasvir (GS-5816; VEL)3-5
–HCV GT 1–6–2nd-generation NS5A inhibitor with improved resistance
profile
• Voxilaprevir (GS-9857)6,7
–HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor –Improved resistance profile
FDC, fixed-dose combination1. Jacobson IM, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1867-77; 2. Lawitz E, et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1878-87; 3. Cheng G, et al. EASL 2013, poster 1191; 4. German P, et al. EASL 2013, poster 1195; 5. Lawitz E, et al. J Viral Hepat 2015;22:1011-9; 6. Taylor JG, et al. EASL 2015, poster 899; 7. Kirby B, et al. EASL 2015, poster 861. 4
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 2 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
Study DesignGS-US-367-1168 and GS-US-367-1169
• Two Phase 2, multicenter, open-label studies (US, New Zealand) – GS-US-367-1168: GT 1 – GS-US-367-1169: GT 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
• Broad inclusion criteria– HCV treatment experienced, including DAA experienced
• GT 1: NS5A inhibitor or ≥2 DAA classes • GT 2–6: Peg-IFN + RBV or any DAA
– 50% with compensated cirrhosis5
0 12 24
SVR12SOF/VEL + GS-9857N=128
Week
Results: Prior Treatment Experience (N=128)
*GT 2-6 patients who failed prior Peg-IFN + RBV regimens.
NS3 NS5A NS5B NUC NS5B NNUC
1%
11%
1%
4%
6%
2%
24%
1%
3%
24%NS5A27%n=35 Non-NS5A
52%n=66
DAA Naïve*21%n=27
2%
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 3 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
99 100 100 97 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Results: SVR12 Overall and by Genotype
7
SV
R12
(%
)
♦ One patient relapsed at post-treatment week 8♦ 58-year-old white female with GT 3a infection, HCV RNA 7.0 log10
IU/mL, and cirrhosis
Overall GT 3GT 2 GT 4, 6GT 1
63/63127/128 9/934/3521/21
Results: Resistance Analysis
*Deep sequencing with 1% assay cutoff.
99%SVR12
100%SVR12
51/51
99%SVR12
76/77
40% No Baseline RAVs
(51/128)
60% Baseline RAVs (77/128)
20%NS5A RAVs
only
15% NS3 RAVs
only23%
Multiple classRAVS
2% NS5B RAVs only
Results: Resistance Analysis
*Deep sequencing with 1% assay cutoff.
99%SVR12
100%SVR12
51/51
99%SVR12
76/77
40% No Baseline RAVs
(51/128)
60% Baseline RAVs (77/128)
20%NS5A RAVs
only
15% NS3 RAVs
only
23%Multiple class
RAVS
2% NS5B RAVs only
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 4 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
1. Ng TI, et al. Abstract 636. CROI, 2014. 2. Ng TI, et al. Abstract 639. CROI, 2014.
DAA Salvage Regimens: Dual Regimen
Glecaprevir (ABT-493) Pangenotypic NS3/4A PIPibrentasvir (ABT-530) Pangenotypic NS5A
• Magellan Study• GT1 non-cirrhotic patients • Failed an NS3 PI and/or NS5A inhibitor-containing
regimen ± sofosbuvir
NS5A Inhibitor Fold Change in EC50 for GT1a NS5A Variants
Q30E L31M/V H58D Y93H/NABT-530 2.4 1.1 – 1.3 1.1 6.7 – 7.1
Ledipasvir1,2 3279 393 – 2787 >1000 4918Velpatasvir3,4 37 2.1 – 9 NA 81 – 609Daclatasvir5 25205 341 – 3386 500 5432 – 47477Elbasvir4,6 50 125 NA 600 – 2000
Ombitasvir7 1326 2 243 41383 – 66740Odalasvir1,4 71 1 – 2.4 8 5083
MK-8408 NA NA NA NANA, not available
ABT-530 Retains Antiviral Activity Against Common GT1a Single-Position NS5A Variants
1. Patel D, et al. EASL, 2015. 2. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2014/205834Orig1s000MicroR.pdf3. Doehle BP, et al. EASL, 2015. 4. Gao M, et al. Curr Opin Virol ; 3:514-20.5. Fridell RA, et al. Hepatology,54:1924-35. 6. Gane E, et al. EASL, 2015. 7. Krishnan P, et al. AAC, 2015.
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 5 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
Treatment experience by DAA class:
Prior DAA Treatment Regimens Among Enrolled
Prior regimen n
LDV/SOF 8SMV + SOF ± RBV 8OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV 4DBV + FDV + RDV ± RBV 4SAM + SMV 2TVR + PR 8BOC + PR 10DCV ± PR 2Other 94 patients were treated more than once with DAA-containing regimens.
PI-expNS5A-naïve
NS5A-expPI-naïve
NS5A-expPI-exp
25 (50%) NS5A-experienced42 (84%) PI-experienced
mITT SVR12 Rates in Patients With Baseline RAVs
* 3 patients with no baseline RAVs were lost to follow-up and are excluded from the mITT analysis. Baseline RAVs based on deep sequencing 1% threshold.
• 100% SVR12 in 10 patients with Y93 NS5A RAVs
• 100% SVR12 in 26 patients with Q80 or R155 NS3 RAVs
• 100% SVR12 in 17 patients with prior failure of a SOF-containing regimen
mITT SVR12 Rates in Patients With Baseline RAVs
* 3 patients with no baseline RAVs were lost to follow-up and are excluded from the mITT analysis. Baseline RAVs based on deep sequencing 1% threshold.
• 100% SVR12 in 10 patients with Y93 NS5A RAVs
• 100% SVR12 in 26 patients with Q80 or R155 NS3 RAVs
• 100% SVR12 in 17 patients with prior failure of a SOF-containing regimen
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 6 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
Baseline RAVs by Deep Sequencing Detection Threshold: 1% vs 15%
Variants detected by deep sequencing (detection limit of 1%) at the following amino acid positions that confer resistance to at least 1 DAA in the inhibitor class were included in the analysis; they may not confer resistance to ABT-493 or ABT-530.NS3: GT1a: V36A/G/I/L/M, F43L, T54A/S, V55A/I, Y56H, Q80K/R, V107I, S122G/R, I132V, R155(all), A156(all), V158I, D168(all), and I170F/T/V.
GT1b: V36A/G/I/L/M, T54A/C/G/S, V55A, Y56H/L, Q80K/R, V107I, S122A/D/G/I/N/T, R155(all), A156(all), V158I, D168(all), V170A/T, and M175L.NS5A: GT1a: M28(all), Q30(all), L31(all), P32L, H58D/R, and Y93(all). GT1b: L28(all), P29S/del, R30G/H/P/Q, L31(all), P32L/del, P58A/S, Q62D, A92E/K, and Y93(all).
ABT-493 doseABT-530 dose
RBV dose200 mg80 mg
(N = 6)
300 mg120 mg800 mg(N = 22)
300 mg120 mg
(N = 22)
Any NS3 or NS5A RAVs, n (%) 5 (83) 4 [67]
19 (86) 18 [82]
17 (77)15 [68]
NS3 only, n 2, 1 6, 7 7, 7
NS5A only, n 3, 3 6, 6 1, 1
Both NS3 and NS5A RAVs, n 0, 0 7, 5 9, 7
NS3 RAV positions: Q80 (n = 22, 21)R155 (n = 4, 1)D168 (n = 4, 4)
NS5A RAV positions:Q30 (n = 14, 11)Y93 (n = 10, 8)
Most common
Baseline RAVs by Deep Sequencing Detection Threshold: 1% vs 15%
Variants detected by deep sequencing (detection limit of 1%) at the following amino acid positions that confer resistance to at least 1 DAA in the inhibitor class were included in the analysis; they may not confer resistance to ABT-493 or ABT-530.NS3: GT1a: V36A/G/I/L/M, F43L, T54A/S, V55A/I, Y56H, Q80K/R, V107I, S122G/R, I132V, R155(all), A156(all), V158I, D168(all), and I170F/T/V.
GT1b: V36A/G/I/L/M, T54A/C/G/S, V55A, Y56H/L, Q80K/R, V107I, S122A/D/G/I/N/T, R155(all), A156(all), V158I, D168(all), V170A/T, and M175L.NS5A: GT1a: M28(all), Q30(all), L31(all), P32L, H58D/R, and Y93(all). GT1b: L28(all), P29S/del, R30G/H/P/Q, L31(all), P32L/del, P58A/S, Q62D, A92E/K, and Y93(all).
ABT-493 doseABT-530 dose
RBV dose
200 mg80 mg
(N = 6)
300 mg120 mg800 mg(N = 22)
300 mg120 mg
(N = 22)
Any NS3 or NS5A RAVs, n (%) 5 (83) 4 [67]
19 (86) 18 [82]
17 (77)15 [68]
NS3 only, n 2, 1 6, 7 7, 7
NS5A only, n 3, 3 6, 6 1, 1
Both NS3 and NS5A RAVs, n 0, 0 7, 5 9, 7
NS3 RAV positions: Q80 (n = 22, 21)R155 (n = 4, 1)D168 (n = 4, 4)
NS5A RAV positions:Q30 (n = 14, 11)
Y93 (n = 10, 8)Most common
SVR12 by ITT and mITT Analysis
mITTABT-493 200 300 300 200 300 300ABT-530 120 120 120 120 120 120RBV 800 800Breakthrough 0 0 1 0 0 1Relapse 0 1 0 0 1 0LTFU 0 1 2 -- -- --
ITT
1 LTFU after week 6 with HCV RNA undetectable
2 patients LTFU after completing treatment (1 death); both achieved SVR8
SVR1
2, %
Patie
nts
010203040
506070
8090
100100
66
91
1922
2022
86
66
1920
2021
100 95 95
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 7 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
C SWIFT: Elbasvir/Grazeprevir + Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 8 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
• Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Combination With Ribavirin for 24 Weeks Is Effective
Retreatment for Patients Who Failed Prior NS5A-Containing DAA Regimens:Results of the Retreatment Study
• Edward J. Gane1, Mitchell L. Shiffman2, Kyle Etzkorn3, Giuseppe Morelli4, Catherine Stedman5, Mitchell N. Davis6, Federico Hinestrosa7, Hadas Dvory-Sobol8, K.C. Huang8, Anu Osinusi8, John McNally8,
Diana M. Brainard8, John G. McHutchison8, Alex Thompson9, Mark Sulkowski10
Abstract 024
EASL 2016 Barcelona
Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Combination With Ribavirin for 24 Weeks Is Effective
Retreatment for Patients Who Failed Prior NS5A-Containing DAA Regimens:Results of the Retreatment Study
Edward J. Gane1, Mitchell L. Shiffman2, Kyle Etzkorn3, Giuseppe Morelli4, Catherine Stedman5, Mitchell N. Davis6, Federico Hinestrosa7,
Hadas Dvory-Sobol8, K.C. Huang8, Anu Osinusi8, John McNally8, Diana M. Brainard8, John G. McHutchison8, Alex Thompson9, Mark Sulkowski10
Abstract 024
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 9 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
Results: Prior Treatment DetailsSOF/VEL + RBV
N=69
Prior GS-9857, n (%) 28 (41)
Prior VEL dose, n (%)
25 mg 28 (41)
100 mg 41 (59)
Prior treatment duration, n (%)
4 or 6 weeks 25 (36)
8 weeks 26 (38)
12 weeks 18 (26)
Cause of treatment failure, n (%)
Relapse 68 (99)
Mean time to retreatment, days (range) 318 (101–600)
Results: Prior Treatment Details
SOF/VEL + RBVN=69
Prior GS-9857, n (%) 28 (41)
Prior VEL dose, n (%)
25 mg 28 (41)
100 mg 41 (59)
Prior treatment duration, n (%)
4 or 6 weeks 25 (36)
8 weeks 26 (38)
12 weeks 18 (26)
Cause of treatment failure, n (%)
Relapse 68 (99)
Mean time to retreatment, days (range) 318 (101–600)
Results: SVR12 by Genotype91 97 91
76
0
20
40
60
80
100
3334
1317
1314
Total GT 1 GT 2 GT 3
SVR1
2 (%
)
1 relapse*
1 nonresponse2 relapses1 WC1 relapse+
5965
+ Relapse after discontinuing treatment at week 3 *Relapse after discontinuing treatment at Week 8,
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; WC, withdrew consent.
Results: SVR12 by Genotype
91 97 9176
0
20
40
60
80
100
3334
1317
1314
Total GT 1 GT 2 GT 3
SVR1
2 (%
)
1 relapse*
1 nonresponse2 relapses1 WC1 relapse+
5965
+ Relapse after discontinuing treatment at week 3 *Relapse after discontinuing treatment at Week 8,
Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals; WC, withdrew consent.
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 10 of 11
Tram T. Tran, MD, FACG
Results: SVR12 by NS5A RAVs
• 11/13 GT 3 patients with RAVs had Y93H; 9 (82%) achieved SVR12• 5 patients had 2 NS5A RAVs; all 5 achieved SVR12• 3 patients had NS3 RAVs; all 3 achieved SVR12
1% deep sequencing cut-off.
*1 patient could not be sequenced; 1 patients who withdrew consent was excluded.
GT 2 (n=13*)GT 1 (n=34) GT 3 (n=16)
100% SVR
100% SVR
100% SVR
38%No RAVs
5/13
62%RAVs8/13
82%No RAVs
28/34
18%RAVs6/34
19%No RAVs3/16
81%RAVs13/16
100% SVR 77% SVR
10/133/38/85/56/6
96% SVR
27/28
Results: SVR12 by NS5A RAVs
11/13 GT 3 patients with RAVs had Y93H; 9 (82%) achieved SVR125 patients had 2 NS5A RAVs; all 5 achieved SVR123 patients had NS3 RAVs; all 3 achieved SVR12
1% deep sequencing cut-off.
*1 patient could not be sequenced; 1 patients who withdrew consent was excluded.
GT 2 (n=13*)GT 1 (n=34) GT 3 (n=16)
100% SVR
100% SVR
100% SVR
38%No RAVs
5/13
62%RAVs8/13
82%No RAVs
28/34
18%RAVs6/34
19%No RAVs3/16
81%RAVs
13/16
100% SVR 77% SVR
10/133/38/85/56/6
96% SVR
27/28
Summary
ACG 2016 Southern Hepatitis School Copyright 2016 American College of Gastroenterology
Page 11 of 11