HCN card failure_MCC_SM-r5
-
Upload
trinankur-hazra -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
0
Transcript of HCN card failure_MCC_SM-r5
SIX SIGMA
1
Project Title: Failures of HCN monitor cards in ACN.
Champion Name: Mr. Newand Harpalani
Project Leader(s): Mr. MC Chokshi (G.B.) Mr. SB Mehta (G.B.)
RCBB: Mr. JK Shah
Team Members: Mr. AV Shah/Mr NK Patel/Mr. Sachin/ Mr. DV Solanki/Mr. Atalia
Process Owner(s): Mr. AV Shah
SIX SIGMA
2
PREFACE
Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is byproduct of ACN.HCN is highly toxic in nature .HCN monitoring system is used to detect any leakage of HCN in plant area and to take immediate corrective action. Also, it activates the water spray system automatically. Hence the HCN monitoring system should work without any unrevealed failure and is expected to detect the leakage positively whenever it occurs.
SIX SIGMA
3
Understanding the VOC
C O S P I CustomerOutputProcessInputSupplier
ACN plant, RIL-VMD
ACN plant, RIL-VMD
ACN plant, RIL-VMD
ACN plant, RIL-VMD
Receipt of HCN monitoring system complying to specs.
Installation as per OEM guidelines and good engineering practice
To achieve required functionality of HCN monitoring system.
To maintain reliable system operation
Procurement of HCN monitoring system
Installation of HCN monitoring system
Commissioning of HCN monitoring system
Maintenance of HCN monitoring system
Specifications
Utility (Power supply), barrier, cables, JB’s etc and vendor/contractor services
Calibration ampoules, calibration setup, OEM service personnel.
Awareness/Training to maintenance crew.
CES/ACN plant
ACN plant, Vendor, contractor.
M/s. Dragger (OEM)
M/s. Dragger (OEM)
R Requirements
Not Met
6 Nos. of HCN monitor card failures in 18 months since installation
SIX SIGMA
4
Project Charter
Business: Reliable HCN monitoring for PSMDefect(s): High no. of HCN monitor card failures.Primary: No. of HCN monitor card failures per quarter.Consequential: Periodical replacement of card/complete unit.
Business Case
Defects & Metrics
Problem Statement
Project Leader(s): Mr. MC Chokshi /Mr. Snehal MehtaChampion/Sponsor: Mr N.V. HarpalaniRCBB : Mr. J.K. ShahTeam: Mr AV Shah/Mr NK Patel/Mr. Sachin/ Mr. DV Solanki/ Mr.AtaliaProcess Owner(s): Mr. AV Shah
Project Scope/Boundaries:Process Start: Procurement Process Stop: MaintenanceIn Scope: Installation & Maintenance Out of Scope: Procurement & Calibration
Milestones/Timeline: Scheduled ActualDefine Tollgate Review: Jan, 2009 Jan’09Measure Tollgate Review: Mar, 2009 Mar’09Analyze Tollgate Review: Apr , 2009 Apr’09Improve Tollgate Review: Apr, 2009 Apr’09Control Tollgate Review: May, 2009 June’09
Customer
Objective Statement
In view of better Process Safety Management, the obsolete HCN monitoring system was replaced. After installation, within 18 months, 6 times card failures were observed for 18 installed monitors. Inspite of putting all efforts problem persisted. Hence, the project was taken as six sigma project in Dec’08.
External: NA
Internal: HOD(ACN Plan)/HOS (Inst-ACN)
Failure of HCN monitor cards in ACN plant from Oct'07 to Dec'08 6 times against expected failures NIL.
Reduce failures of HCN monitor cards from an average of 4/year to zero by April’09.
Financial Impact (SOFT Project)
Type of BenefitsAnnualized
Savings (Rs. Lacs)
Top line Growth (Revenue) NA
Net Bottom-line Growth (Hard Savings) NA
Cost Avoidance NA
Total
D A M I C
SIX SIGMA
5
Project Scoping D A M I C
AQUEOUS WASTE STREAM FOR TREATMENTLP STEAM
PROCESS VENT TO ATMOSHPERE FROM ABSORBER
PROPYLENE
AMMONIA
CONDENSATE
DM WATER
STEAMB/D
WASTE WATER
SEWER
ACN TO PRODUCT STORAGE
ACN PRODUCT HCN PRODUCT
HCN MONITORING SYSTEM IN ACN PLANT
PROCESS AIR COMPRESSOR
OXYGEN FROM PP4
REACTOR SECTION
CATALYST STORAGE & HANDLING
BOILER FEED WATER
TREATMENT
BFW CHEMICAL ADDITION
QUENCH SYSTEMRECOVERY
SYSTEM
PURIFICATION SECTION
PRODUCT RUNDOWN
TANK
SULPHURIC ACID
CHEMICAL AND INHIBITOR
PRE TREATMENT
SYSTEM
CIRCULAR POND
CRUDE ACRYLO TANK
SEGREGATED PROCESS SEWER
SLOP WATER TANK
CATALYST SETTLING
INCINERATOR
HCN SECTION
ACETONITRILE PURIFICATION
POND
INHIBITORS
HM19HM11HM16
HM18
HM14
HM28
HM21
HM29
HM12 HM13
HM17 HM15HM23
HM22
HM27
HM24
HM26
HM25
SIX SIGMA
6
Target Setting
Baseline 4 failures/yr
Entitlement NA
Target 0 failures/yr
Result 0 failures since April’09
D A M I C
SIX SIGMA
7
Measure Phase Overview
Measure Process Mapping Fishbone Analysis List of Quick Wins Key Shortlisted Xs
M A D I C
SIX SIGMA
8
POND
HCN MONITORING SYSTEM IN ACN PLANT
AQUEOUS WASTE STREAM FOR TREATMENT
LP STEAM
PROCESS VENT TO
ATMOSHPERE FROM ABSORBER
PROPYLENE
AMMONIA Process Mapping
CONDENSATE
DM WATER
STEAM
B/D
WASTE WATER
SEWER
ACN TO PRODUCT STORAGE
ACN PRODUCT HCN PRODUCT
HCN MONITORING SYSTEM
UPS POWER
SENSOR
TRANSMITTER UNIT
SIGNAL CONDITION
ER
POWER SUPPLY CARD
MEMORYOUTPUT MODULE
BARRIER DCS I/O CARD
110VAC/24VDC P/S
Procurement Installation Commissioning Maintenance
M A D I C
SIX SIGMA
9
Fishbone Analysis M A D I C
Improper regulation
Defective PS boardincompatible barrier Earthpit drydefective barrier Improper MOC
Salt level low
Deliberate touch
Improper location
Improper support
Nearby steam or otherhot source Water spray
steam leakagesteam leakage process drains
Periodical area cleaning
Nearbyhot work
Fire hydrant testing
Improper mounting of canopySkill
KnowledgeExperience
Lack of trainingHeavy rain
High temperature Vibration Poor maintenance
Poor mounting
improper supportmounting on beamAmbient
condition
Poor quality of component
Sunlight exporsure
RF interference
Nearby heavy machines
Component failure
Dry solderImproper fixing of PCB'sHigh voltage to Tx. Card
Poor supervision
Technical ability
Defective hardware
Improper handling
Poor installation
Water ingress
Surrounding steam/water
Poor Tx. ProtectionCanopy not providedCanopy damaged
Humidity high
SMP not followed
No SMP
High voltage cable running parallel
On/Off switching of heavy equipment
Shield connected to both ends
Interference/Noise in power supply
Human errorSOP not followed
Fluctuation in power supply
Loose connection
Human improper crimpingFaulty/rusted TB
nearby welding work
Failure of HCN monitor cards
High resistance of earthpit
Improper Earthing/ Shielding
No connection/continuity
nearby walkie-talkie / mobile
SIX SIGMA
10
List of Quick wins M A D I C
• During Measure phase brainstorming and interaction with the OEM, it emerged that output voltage from existing barrier (MTL 5042) was 17.3 V which was very near to minimum acceptable limit of 16 V for reliable operation of HCN monitoring system. After testing, alternate barrier MTL 5041 was found supplying 23 V to the transmitter and hence was more suitable to take care of voltage fluctuation on lower side. Subsequently, barriers in 2 loops were replaced with alternate barrier MTL 5041 in Feb’09 and since then no card failures were observed. Based upon above test, barriers in all the remaining 16 loops have been replaced with MTL 5041.
• During field checks, grounding of shields in 6 nos. of loops was found not connected. Out of the 6 loops, failures of HCN monitor cards was observed in 2 loops which might be attributed to improper shielding. Shielding for all the 18 loops was ensured as per standard engineering practice.
SIX SIGMA
11
List of Xs Shortlisted from CE Matrix
Name of ‘X’Sl. No.
Power supply characteristicsX1
M A D I C
EnclosureX2
Noise immunityX3
Barrier compatibility with Tx.X4
OEM recommendation for installationX5
Grounding / EarthingX6
Skill / Knowledge of maintenance personnelX7
Health check / LLF of HCN monitoring systemX8
Quality inspection for workmanship of Tx. modulesX9
File
SIX SIGMA
12
Analyze Phase Overview
Analyze FMEA Form FMEA Action Details Data Collection Plan MAIC Funnel
A D M I C
SIX SIGMA
13
FMEA Form A D M I C
Power supply characteristics
supply>30V component failure of PS board
10 Malfunctioning of voltage regulatory system of COSEL PS.
3 COSEL regulated supply & barrier
6 180
10 High voltage cable running parallel
3 BMP compliance 6 180
10 On/Off switching of heavy equipment
3 Good engineering practice 6 180
10 Faulty barrier 2 procurement of standard make barriers
6 120
Rapid ON/OFF switching of power supply corruption of microcontroller memory/ damage to PS board
10 loose connection 6 skill technician, scheduled audits, standard wiring practice
6 360
10 barrier/PS malfunction 3 procurement of standard make barriers /PS
6 180
Compatibility with Tx. Supply to Tx. Out of limits (Current at Tx > 22 mA, Voltage > 30 VDC)
Failure of component of P/S
6 Improper current regulation by barrier
1 Barrier compatibility check before
3 18
Good engineering practice
Enclosure not as per IP54 SC in PCB's due to water ingress
10 Improper fixing of enclosure
3 skill technician, scheduled audits
3 90
10 Improper dimensions of enclosure
1 specifications, inspections 1 10
Water ingress SC in PCB's 10 Heavy rain 3 scheduled audits for monsoon protection/
3 90
10 Nearby steam leakages
3 LLF 2 60
10 process drains 2 LLF 2 40
10 Periodical area cleaning with water jet
2 LLF 2 40
10 Fire hydrant testing 2 Canopy provision done/ Monsoon protection for Tx.
2 40
10 Canopy improper 2 LLF 3 60
10 improper glanding 2 skilled technician, LLF 3 60
RPN
DET
Potential Failure Mode (What is wrong with the X / How the X fails?)
Characteristic of Input (KPIV / X)
Current Process Controls
Potential Cause(s)/Mechanism(s) of Failure (Sub X's)
OCC
Potential Effects of Failure (Y or
Mini-Y)
SEV
File
SIX SIGMA
14
Xs Treatment based on FMEA
# Xs for further scrutiny 17
(Sev > 7 & RPN > 300)
# Xs for immediate actions 0
(RPN 125 to 300)
# Xs with no action required 13
(RPN 1 to 125)
A D M I C
Actions have been taken for Xs irrespective of RPN wherever simple, quick and cost-effective solutions were possible
SIX SIGMA
15
Actions Count
Total Recommended
30
Timely Completion/ Ongoing
28
Delayed Completion
0
Pending Completion
2
FMEA Action Summary
Action Type Summary Count
Mistake Proofing 1
Occurrence Reduction (w/o Mistake Proofing)
23
Detection Improvement 6
A D M I C
SIX SIGMA
16
Data collection -1 A D M I C
RZ-6 13/14 RB-1/64 RZ-2 31/32 RB-2/47 RZ-3 15/16 RB-2/42
Barrier input (V)
Barrier output (V)
Sensor head (V)
Barrier input (V)
Barrier output (V)
Sensor head (V)
Barrier input (V)
Barrier output (V)
Sensor head (V)
1 31.01.09 23.13 17.78 23.36 17.63 23.13 17.62 02.02.09 23.12 17.78 23.36 17.63 23.13 17.63 04.02.09 23.12 17.78 17.79 23.36 17.63 17.65 23.13 17.6 17.634 06.02.09 23.12 17.78 17.8 23.36 17.63 17.64 23.12 17.6 17.65 08.02.09 23.13 17.78 17.79 23.37 17.63 17.64 23.13 17.59 17.636 10.02.09 23.13 17.78 17.79 23.37 17.63 17.64 23.12 17.6 17.637 12.02.09 23.12 17.78 17.8 23.37 17.63 23.11 17.68 12.02.09 23.12 17.78 23.38 23.37 23.3 23.12 23.1 239 14.02.09 23.12 17.79 17.79 23.38 23.37 23.3 23.12 23.1 23
10 16.02.09 23.13 17.8 17.8 23.38 23.37 23.3 23.12 23.1 2311 18.02.09 23.13 17.8 17.79 23.38 23.37 23.3 23.13 23.1 23
Measurement of voltages in loop at barrier and at sensor head
Sr. No. Date Remarks
After replacing barrier with MTL 5041
HM-17 HM-22 HM-24MRC-302 MRC-303 MRC-302
SIX SIGMA
17
Data collection -2 A D M I C
TransmitterDCS
marshelling cabinet
Shield connected to earth (Y/N)
Branch cable shield connected to JB shield bus bar (Y/N)
Shields from multicore cable connected to JB shield bus bar (Y/N)
Shields of multicore cable connected to signal earth (Y/N)
1 BACNHM1.1 J B- BA121- 11E NO YES YES YES2 BACNHM1.2 J B- BA611- 02E NO YES YES YES3 BACNHM1.3 J B- BA611- 02E NO YES YES YES4 BACNHM1.4 J B- BA131- 01E NO YES YES YES5 BACNHM1.5 J B- BA611- 02E NO YES YES YES6 BACNHM1.6 J B- BA121- 03E NO NO* YES YES7 BACNHM1.7 J B- BA611- 02E NO NO* YES YES8 BACNHM1.8 J B- BA121- 02E NO NO* YES YES9 BACNHM1.9 J B- BA121- 03E NO NO* YES YES10 BACNHM2.1 J B- BA141- 03E NO YES YES YES11 BACNHM2.2 J B- BA141- 03E NO YES YES YES12 BACNHM2.3 J B- BA141- 05E NO YES YES YES13 BACNHM2.4 J B- BA141- 02E NO NO* YES YES14 BACNHM2.5 J B- BA141- 02E NO YES YES YES15 BACNHM2.6 J B- BA141- 02E NO YES YES YES16 BACNHM2.7 J B- BA141- 03E NO YES YES YES17 BACNHM2.8 J B- BA141- 05E NO NO* YES YES18 BACNHM2.9 DIRECT NO NO J B NO J B YES
Note* FOUND NOT CONNECTED IN SHIELD BAR IN J B BUT NOW CONNECTED.
Audit for grounding of shield for HCN monitors
Sr. No.
TAG No. J B No.
J unction Box
SIX SIGMA
18
MAIC Funnel – Xs PrioritizationTool Box
Measure ToolsPFD, Input/Output worksheet, Fishbone, CE-Matrix
Analyze ToolsFMEA
Improve ToolsBrainstorming
Control ToolsBrainstorming, Control plan
119
19
6
A D M I C
9
SIX SIGMA
19
Improve Phase
Summary of Changes Made:
Existing MTL 5042 barriers replaced by MTL 5041 in all 18 nos. HCN monitoring system in ACN plant.
Additional two sets of diagnostic dongles to be purchased and installed on rotational basis. This shall improve monitoring as each detector shall be monitored once every 6 months as compared to once every 18 months with existing one set of dongles.
I D M A C
SIX SIGMA
20
Control Phase Overview
Control Control Plans for Sustainable Results Project Transition Action Plan (PTAP) Revised FMEA Form Learning Project Closure Sign-off
C D M A I
SIX SIGMA
21
Control Plans for Sustainable Results
D M A I C
C D M A I
Type Brief Details
The Column A of FMEA form
Mention the parameter (Input - X /
Output - Y) to be controlled
Is the parameter an
input or an output?
What are the specifications / requirements
which the parameter
"What's Controlled"
should meet?
How will you measure / know the value/status of the parameter "What's
Controlled"?
How will you ensure that the
parameter remains within
specifications or meets
requirements?
Explain the control method
implemented
What is the sample size,
taken at one time, for measurement?
Maintenance of Monitors
Power supply characteristics
Input Supply to Tx. Within limits
(Voltage between 16 - 30 VDC)
By measurement SOP (1) Log of Tx. Supply voltage shall be helpful in knowing PS variation etc.(2) Whenever barrier is changed it should be replaced with MTL 5041 barrier
One
As and when required
Maintenance of Monitors
Power supply characteristics
Input No power supply interruption to Tx.
Using diagnostic dongle
SOP Diagnostic dongle logs power cycle as an event. So, any power interruption to Tx. can be determined
1 for 30 days
Maintenance of Monitors
Water ingress Input No water ingress should be observed
Physical inspection of Tx. during calibration
SOP (1) Coordination between Instrument & Process at time of area cleaning. (2) Coordination between Inst/ Process & Fire during fire system checking(3)Monsoon protection
One
Maintenance of Monitors
No high vibration of Tx.
Input LLF SOP During LLF to be ensured that there is no vibration of Tx.
One
Maintenance of Monitors
Protection from sunlight
Input Such that Temp should be < 60 deg C
Using sensor dongle SOP Dongle data to be analysed for any high temp alarm event. Also, to be checked that proper sunlight protection to Tx. Is provided by canopy.
1 for 30 days
Maintenance of Monitors
Shielding/Grounding integrity
Input As per OEM recommendations
Physical checking SOP (1) All shields to be intact. Also, shields to be grounded only at C/R.(2) Earthpit resistance should be < 10 ohm
One
Maintenance of Monitors
Knowledge about monitors
Input Knowledge about operation and maintenance procedures as per OEM manual
Refresher training and validation
SOP All supervisory/non supervisory to undergo refresher training in operation & maintenance of HCN monitors
One
Input orOutput?
Spec. Limits / Requirements
Measurement Method
Sample SizeControl Method
Process StepWhat's
Controlled?
SIX SIGMA
22
Control Plan actions for Sustainable Results C D M A I
(1) To maintain supply at HCN monitor between 16-30 V DC, any replacement of barrier should be by MTL 5041 only.
(2) Diagnostic dongles to be installed in monitors on rotating basis (monthly) to have log of events related to power interruption and over temperature exposure
(3) Shielding integrity and earthpit resistance to be checked once per year for reliable performance of HCN monitoring system.
(4) Healthcheck to be done once in a month for ensuring no vibration on HCN monitor.
(5) Water ingress to HCN monitor to be prevented by:• Carrying out healthcheck as per schedule.• Carrying out monsoon protection as per standard procedure.• Coordination between Instrument, Process and Fire deptt. during
fire monitor testing and periodical area cleaning.
(6) Refresher training and validation for supervisory/nonsupervisory personnel for HCN monitoring system should be carried out once in a year.
SIX SIGMA
23
Project Transition Action Plan (PTAP)
D M A I C
C D M A I
Project Title: Failures of HCN monitor cards in ACN.Transition Owner: Mr. Newand HarpalaniPlan Date: 31/05/'09
Sr. No. Actions Required for Completion
ActionOwner
InitialsScheduledCompletion
ActualCompletion
1 To ensure monsoon protection to HCN monitors every fortnight during monsoon
HOS Ongoing
2 Determine probability of steam leakage in sensor/Tx. Vicinity and decide frequency of LLF.
HOS Ongoing
3 (1) Process drains to be avoided(2) If required, to be done after informing inst. For necessary precautionary measures.
HOS Ongoing
4 Periodical area cleaning to be done after informing inst. for necessary precautionary measures.
HOS Ongoing
5 (1) Probability of water ingress due to fire hydrant testing to be ensured.(2) Fire personnel to be made aware about possible Tx. failure due to water ingress.
HOS Ongoing
6 Ensure canopy and monsoon protection is intact HOS Ongoing7 (1) Ensure cable entry to Tx. Is from bottom.
(2) Ensure gland sealant or monsoon protection tape is applied.HOS Ongoing
8 Verify condition of canopy during LLF HOS Ongoing9 Verify whether instrument has proper sunlight protection or not
during LLFHOS Ongoing
10 Training/Counselling to all supervisors/technicians to be ensured
HOS 31.07.2009
SIX SIGMA
24
Revised FMEA Form
D M A I C
C D M A I
SEV
OCC
DET
RPN
Power supply characteristics
supply>30V 10 3 COSEL regulated supply &
barrier
6 180 (1) Confirm Tx. Sensitivity (Volt V/s time ) to PS over voltage. (2) COSEL P/S regulation(3) Characteristic of
10 1 6 60
10 3 BMP compliance 6 180 audit for cable
routing10 1 2 20
10 3 Good engineering practice 6 180 audit of Tx.
Installation10 1 1 10
10 2 procurement of standard
make barriers
6 120 test setup to study variation in barrier
10 1 6 60
Rapid ON/OFF switching of power supply 10 6 skill technician, scheduled
audits, standard wiring practice
6 360 Wago screwless terminals, proper size wires ferrules, lugs,
10 1 6 60
10 3 procurement of standard
make barriers /PS
6 180 test setup to study variation in barrier
10 2 6 120
Compatibility with Tx. Supply to Tx. Out of limits (Current at Tx > 22 mA, Voltage > 30 VDC)
6 1 Barrier compatibility check before
3 18 ensure & follow OEM
6 1 3 18
Good engineering practice
Enclosure not as per IP54 10 3 skill technician, scheduled audits
3 90 Checking of enclosure fixing
10 10
10 1 specifications, inspections 1 10 Checking of enclosure
10 10
Water ingress 10 3 scheduled audits for monsoon protection/
3 90 To ensure monsoon
10 10
10 3 LLF 2 60 Determine probability of
10 10
10 2 LLF 2 40 (1) Process drains to be avoided
10 10
10 2 LLF 2 40 To be done after informing inst. For
10 10
10 2 Canopy provision done/ Monsoon protection for Tx.
2 40 (1) Probability of water ingress due
10 10
10 2 LLF 3 60 Ensure canopy and monsoon
10 10
10 2 skilled technician, LLF 3 60 (1) Ensure cable entry to Tx. Is
10 10
Action ResultsRPN
RecommendedAction(s)
DET
Potential Failure Mode (What is wrong with the X / How the X fails?)
Characteristic of Input (KPIV / X)
Current Process Controls
OCC
SEV
File
SIX SIGMA
25
Learning
OEM had recommended MTL 5042 for LAB HF monitor being procured. However, based upon the findings regarding compatibility of barrier MTL 5042 with HCN monitor, procurement of barriers changed from MTL 5042 to MTL 5041.
Earthing of critical loops of ACN plant to be checked for shielding integrity in earliest available opportunity. Grounding should be done as per standard engineering practice and should be audited immediately after commissioning for compliance of the same and subsequently to be monitored periodically.
Thank you