HAS THE SERVICE QUALITY IN PRIVATE CORPORATE ...2013/01/02 · the vast majority of the country. Of...

Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review__________________________________________ ISSN 2319-2836 Vol.2 (1), January (2013) Online available at indianresearchjournals.com

19

HAS THE SERVICE QUALITY IN PRIVATE CORPORATE HOSPITALS

MEET THE PATIENT EXPECTATIONS? A STUDY ABOUT HOSPITAL

QUALITY IN CHENNAI

S.SHARMILA*; DR.JAYASREE KRISHNAN**

* Research Scholar

Sathyabama University, Chennai.

** St.Josephs College of Engineering,

Chennai.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

This paper seeks to present an analysis of the literature examining objective information

concerning the subject of patient satisfaction, as it applies to the current medical practices. The

study in this paper carries information about patients as customers, current understanding of the

patient satisfaction and its determinants, measurement issues and present medical practices.

Hopefully, this information will be synthesized to generate a cogent approach to correlate patient

satisfaction with quality. As the empirical setting this study concerns five dimensions of

hospitals in Chennai city. The survey instrument in a questionnaire form was designed to achieve

the research objectives. A total of 385 questionnaires consisting of namely 22 items were given

to the higher/officers level employees working in different organization out of which only 320

replies were absolute and useful to the study. A five point scale was used to find out the result.

Health-care services quality should be exclusively evaluated by the patients. The patients in the

hospital found many good and bad issues among the stated items. The patients were more

comfortable with the physicians than the nurses. Many other items were found to be moderate.

Results show that in private hospitals doctors are genuinely concerned for their patients, doctors

and nurses has attentions to care their patients and private hospitals are putting their maximum

efforts in order to provide comforts to their patients. This result can be used by the hospital to

redesign and to improve their quality management processes and for the future direction of their

more effective healthcare quality strategies in hospitals. This paper also identifies some

discomfort in the patient services quality of the hospital. At the same time, patients are changing

their attitudes towards health-care, becoming much more concerned and demanding of health

services. This paper reveals the importance of quality evaluation of patient services in few items

for their repeated visits and increased patient satisfaction.

KEYWORDS: Health-care industry, patient satisfaction, quality of patient services, physicians

and nursing care. _____________________________________________________________________________________


20

INTRODUCTION

The healthcare industry has to cope with environmental pressures such as demographic changes

and ageing of populations as well as emergence of new treatments and technologies and

increased insistence on greater quality of service in order to remain competitive (Ingram and

Desombre, 1999; Andaleeb, 1998).

Competitiveness among the healthcare organizations also depends upon patient‘s satisfaction.

Patient‘s satisfaction is created through a combination of responsiveness to the patient‘s views

and needs, and continuous improvement of the healthcare services, as well as continuous

improvement of the overall doctor-patient relationship. Determining the factors associated with

patients satisfaction is important topic for the healthcare provider to understand what is valued

by patients, how the quality of care is perceived by the patients and to know where, when and

how service change and improvement can be made.

Most of the studies in the services sector have looked only at the link between services quality

and satisfaction (e.g. Kelly and Davis, 1994; Parasuraman et al., 1994; Bettencourt, 1997;

Zineldin, 2000a). Few studies have been conducted to investigate the link between technical and

functional quality dimensions and the level of patient‘s satisfaction in the healthcare sector. None

of the studies have empirically examined how the atmosphere, interaction and infrastructure

might impact the overall patient‘s quality expectations and satisfaction.

In this study the researcher would like to bring out the fact that a patient‘s satisfaction is a

cumulative construct summing satisfaction with various facts of the hospital, such as technical,

functional, infrastructure, interaction and atmosphere variables or items. So in this study the

researcher has brought different constructs under five variables to measure the patients‘

expectations and satisfaction. It is based on these variables a study was conducted and with those

constructs a sequential equation model has been designed to evaluate the quality of service in the

hospitals in Chennai city. This research attempt to contribute the previous academic studies in

quality management in healthcare sector by, designing a SEM model towards the quality of

service in Chennai hospitals. This study involves the respondents only at the officers‘ level at

various service organizations with various educational backgrounds and hence will reveal the

fact of different opinion among the quality care in hospitals, and hence summing up all the

opinions will bring the study towards the goal of patient satisfaction in service quality.

The result can be used by the hospitals to reengineer and redesign creatively their quality

management processes and the future direction of their more effective healthcare quality

strategies.

HEALTHCARE IN INDIA:

A growing healthcare sector:

Healthcare is one of India‘s largest sectors, in terms of revenue and employment, and the sector

is expanding rapidly. During the 1990s, Indian healthcare grew at a compound annual rate of

16%. Today the total value of the sector is more than $34 billion. This translates to $34 per


21

capita, or roughly 6% of GDP. By 2013, India‘s healthcare sector is projected to grow to nearly

$40 billion. The private sector accounts for more than 80% of total healthcare spending in India.

Unless there is a decline in the combined federal and state government deficit, which currently

stands at roughly 9%, the opportunity for significantly higher public health spending will be

limited.

The healthcare divide:

When it comes to healthcare, there are two India‘s: the country with that provides high-quality

medical care to middle-class Indians and medical tourists, and the India in which the majority of

the population lives—a country whose residents have limited or no access to quality care. Today

only 25% of the Indian population has access to Western (allopathic) medicine, which is

practiced mainly in urban areas, where two-thirds of India‘s hospitals and health centers are

located. Many of the rural poor must rely on alternative forms of treatment, such as ayurvedic

medicine, unani and acupuncture. The federal government has begun taking steps to improve

rural healthcare. Among other things, the government launched the National Rural Health

Mission 2005-2012 in April 2005. The aim of the Mission is to provide effective healthcare to

India‘s rural population, with a focus on 18 states that have low public health indicators and/or

inadequate infrastructure. Through the Mission, the government is working to increase the

capabilities of primary medical facilities in rural areas, and ease the burden on to tertiary care

centers in the cities, by providing equipment and training primary care physicians in how to

perform basic surgeries, such as cataract surgery.

Deteriorating infrastructure

India‘s healthcare infrastructure has not kept pace with the economy‘s growth. The physical

infrastructure is woefully inadequate to meet today‘s healthcare demands, much less tomorrows.

While India has several centers of excellence in healthcare delivery, these facilities are limited in

their ability to drive healthcare standards because of the poor condition of the infrastructure in

the vast majority of the country. Of the 15,393 hospitals in India in 2002, roughly two-thirds

were public. After years of under-funding, most public health facilities provide only basic care.

With a few exceptions, such as the All India Institute of Medical Studies (AIIMS), public health

facilities are inefficient, inadequately managed and staffed, and have poorly maintained medical

equipment. The number of public health facilities also is inadequate. For instance, India needs

74,150 community health centers per million populations but has less than half that number. In

addition, at least 11 Indian states do not have laboratories for testing drugs, and more than half of

existing laboratories are not properly equipped or staffed. The principal responsibility for public

health funding lies with the state governments, which provide about 80% of public funding. The

federal government contributes another 15%, mostly through national health programs.

However, the total healthcare financing by the public sector is dwarfed by private sector

spending. In 2003, fee-charging private companies accounted for 82% of India‘s $30.5 billion

expenditure on healthcare. This is an extremely high proportion by international standards.

Private firms are now thought to provide about 60% of all outpatient care in India and as much as

40% of all in-patient care. It is estimated that nearly 70% of all hospitals and 40% of hospital

beds in the country are in the private sector.


22

Healthcare units in India:

The below chart shows the total number of healthcare units in India.

q

Source: RHS bulletin Ministry of health and family welfare

India’s Population, Decennial Growth Rate and Population Density – 2011

Decennial Growth Rate [%] Population Density

1991-2001 [2001] Persons/Sq. Km

Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total

India 18.10 31.48 21.54 238 3663 312

Source: Population Census of India, Office of the Registrar General, India

Rise of disease:

Another factor driving the growth of India‘s healthcare sector is a rise in both infectious and

chronic degenerative diseases. While ailments such as poliomyelitis, leprosy, and neonatal

tetanus will soon be eliminated, some communicable diseases once thought to be under control,

such as dengue fever, viral hepatitis, tuberculosis, malaria, and pneumonia, have returned in

force or have developed a stubborn resistance to drugs. This troubling trend can be attributed in

part to substandard housing, inadequate water, sewage and waste management systems, a

crumbling public health infrastructure, and increased air travel.

In addition to battling infectious diseases, India is grappling with the emergence of diseases such

as AIDS as well as food- and water-borne illnesses. And as Indians live more affluent lives and

adopt unhealthy western diets that are high in fat and sugar, the country is experiencing a rise in

lifestyle diseases such as hypertension, cancer, and diabetes, which is reaching epidemic


23

proportions. Over the next 5-10 years, lifestyle diseases are expected to grow at a faster rate than

infectious diseases in India, and to result in an increase in cost per treatment. Wellness programs

targeted at the workplace, where many sedentary jobs are contributing to an erosion of

employees‘ health, could help to reduce the rising incidence of lifestyle diseases.

India and Tamil nadu Health Infrastructure: A comparison:

Tamil Nadu is the eleventh largest state in India by area and the seventh most populous state. It

is the second largest state economy in India as of 2012, after overtaking Uttar Pradesh and

Andhra Pradesh in the two years since 2010 when it was the fourth largest contributor to India's

GDP. The state ranked among the top 5 states in India in Human Development Index as of

2006.Tamil Nadu is also the most urbanised state in India. The state has the highest number

(10.56%) of business enterprises and stands second in total employment (9.97%) in India,

compared to the population share of about 6%.The below chart shows the total number of public

healthcare centres available in Tamilnadu.

Figure 1: Healthcare units in Tamilnadu Vs India


24

Though we have so many number of health care centres provided by the government we have

still deficiency in the quality of the health care in general. So, there are numerous private

hospitals in the capital city Chennai.

Shortfall in health infrastructure as per 2001 population in India (as on March 2010)

TOTAL

POPULA

TION IN

RURAL

AREAS

TRIBAL

POPULAT

ION IN

RURAL

AREAS

SUB CENTRES

PUBLIC

HEALTH

CENTRES

COMMUNITY

HEALTH

CENTRES

R P S R P S R P S

TAMI

L

NAD

U

37921681 55143 7057 8706 * 117

3

128

3

* 293 256 37

INDIA 74249063

9

77338597 1587

92

1470

69

195

90

260

22

236

73

425

2

649

1

453

5

21

15

R-Required. P- In position. S- Short fall. *- Surplus.

Source: RHS bulletin Ministry of health and family welfare

Quality:

Quality could be defined as the ability to meet or exceed customer expectations. This definition

reflects a shift in thinking from one of quality as defined by producers to one being ―customer

driven‖. It is crucial to be able to measure healthcare service quality because increased

competition has forced healthcare organizations to become more market-oriented (Vandamme

and Leunis, 1992). In the healthcare industry, most service providers offer similar services but

often varying levels of service quality (Youssef et al., 1996).

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY:

The study was undertaken to assess the patient‘s perception about the quality of services in

private hospitals in Chennai city. This study aims to find the quality of the doctors, nurses, staffs,

hygiene condition, cleanliness, pharmacy services, lab facilities and the emotional aspects of the

services received by the patients‘ in private hospitals.


25

LITERATURE REVIEW:

Bergh performed an interim analysis to suggest that patients expressed a mean of 6.5 diagnostic

possibilities compared to 2.8 potential diagnoses in the physicians‘ differential diagnosis (Bergh,

1998). This illustrates the fact that patients often have idiosyncratic unpredictable diagnostic

concerns often expressed indirectly and founded in prior experience with family illness.

Patients often have unvoiced agendas regarding their presentations for primary illness. Barry

evaluated 35 patients in which only four (11 percent) patients voiced all their concerns (Barry et

al., 2000). The most common unvoiced agenda items includes worries about the possible

diagnosis, patient thoughts about what is wrong, medicine side effects, or not wanting a

prescription. This disconnects between expectation and outcome was found in 100 percent of

complaints resulting in misunderstanding, unwanted prescriptions, medication and treatment

noncompliance.

Bell evaluated 909 patients where 9% had at least one unvoiced desire specifically for specialilty

physician referral (16.5%) and physical therapy 8.2%. Those with unvoiced desires tended to be

young, uneducated and less likely to trust the physician. This behavior was associated with a

decreased likelihood of symptom improvement, and less positive evaluation of physician and the

visit.

The ability for physicians to predict the patient‘s reason for the health care visit was evaluated by

Boland in 458 patients. Agreement was excellent with only 20% disagreement found which was

more common with female gender, multiple complaints and previous evaluations which were for

the same complaint, which were independent predictors of low agreement. Interestingly, this

discrepancy between the physicians understanding of the reason for the patients visit, and the

patients‘ actual chief complaint was not associated with patient satisfaction (Boland et al,).

METHODOLOGY

This research was conducted at local level in Chennai, the capital city of the

Indian state of Tamil Nadu in India. Chennai is the sixth most populous city in India with 4.68

million residents as on census 2011.A questionnaire was developed using ‗SERVQUAL‘

instrument consisting of 22 items representing five service quality dimensions empathy,

assurance, tangible, timeliness and responsiveness. These service quality dimensions are

considered as construct: empathy contains 4 items, assurance constrains 6 items, tangible

contains 6 items, timeliness contains 3 items and responsiveness contains 3 items.

The target population of this study was the employees working at officer level in the service

organizations and availing healthcare services including consultation and inpatient from the best

private hospitals in the city, Chennai. A total 387 questionnaire was send to the different service

organizations and total 320 questionnaires were returned back, which represents an effective

response rate of 82.69%. Five-point Likert Scale from strongly disagrees to the strongly agrees

was used for empirical analysis. The coding of the Likert scale was made as [1 = strongly

disagree], [2 = disagree], [3 = neither agree nor disagree], [4 = agree], [5 = strongly agree]. The

descriptive statistics of the respondents of this study is given below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_and_territories_of_India

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Nadu


26

Table: 1

Gender Frequency Percentage Cumulative

percentage

Male 198 61.87 61.87

Female 122 38.13 100.00

Total 320 100

Table.1 shows the frequency distribution of the gender comprised of male and female. There

were total 320 participants in this study and 198 participants were male representing 61.87 % of

the total population and 122 participants were female representing 38.13% of the total

population. Table. 2 show the frequency distribution of qualification of the respondent. Out of

320 respondents, 21.87% of the respondents were graduates, 51.25% of the respondents were

having masters‘ degree and 26.88% were MS/Ph.D.

Table: 2

Education Frequency Percentage Cumulative

percentage

Graduate 70 21.87 21.87

Master 164 51.25 73.12

MS/PhD 86 26.88 100

320 100

DATA ANALYSIS

To measure the service quality of the private hospitals, data was analyzed using SPSS 16.0 and

AMOS 16.0 was used. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is most frequently and commonly

used method to test the validity of the models that are path analytic with mediating variables and

it includes latent variables (Agresti, 2002; Hair et al., 2008; Luna-Arocas & Camps, 2008) and it

is also a powerful tool in investigating causal relationships between categorical variables

(Bollen, 1989; Bollen & Long, 1993; Mels, 2004). Due to this reason SEM is used in this study

to analyze the results and hypothesis.


27

RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS

The theoretical service quality model is presented in Figure 1, using AMOS 16.0 for windows. A

significant Chi-square having p-value less than 0.05 and the value of normed-chi-square between

1 and 3 indicates that proposed model is providing a sufficient presentation of the relationship

among the studied variables (Seo, Han, & Lee, 2005). The goodness of fit indices (GFI)

(Bentrler, 1990) having values greater than 0.70 in case of complex models (Judge & Hulin,

1993), the comparative fit index (CFI) traces the relative improvement of the assessed model

over a null where observed variables are assumed uncorrelated and it value from 0 .00 to 1.00

and the value close to zero indicates a well fit model and its value close to 1.00 indicate a very

good fit (Bentler, 1990; Hu & Bentler, 1999). Root mean squared error of approximation

(RMSEA) (Bowne and Cudeck, 1993) and for RMSEA a value of less than 0.05 indicates a close

fit and value less than 0.08 represents a good model (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Byrne, 2001).

Table 3, shows the variable used in the study and their brief description, factor loading and

measurement coefficient Cronbach alpha of each construct. To check the validity of the

instrument is another important factor during statistical analysis. According to Gatewood and

Field (1990), reliability of the instrument helps to provides consistency in the results and the

Cronbach alpha is used to measure the reliability of the data (Green et al., 2000).

Twenty two items of this study has provided acceptable values of Cronbach alpha (0.911), as a

value of alpha greater than 0.70 is acceptable (Nunnally, 1978). Secondly, the reliability of the

individual constructs is also calculated and it provides us acceptable values as mentioned by

Nunnally (1978). The first construct of the study was empathy comprises of 4 items and the

measurement coefficient Cronbach alpha for this construct is has (0.82) providing an acceptable

value. The second construct is tangible, contains 6 items. The second construct is tangible,

contains 6 items and the measurement coefficient Cronbach alpha for this construct is (0.77)

providing an acceptable value of alpha. The third construct was assurance contains 6 items and

the measurement coefficient Cronbach alpha for this construct is (0.82), fourth construct contains

3 items and the value of Cronbach alpha is (0.73) and fifth construct contains 3 items having

Cronbach alpha (0.75). Therefore all the constructs used in this study have an acceptable value of

alpha.


28

TABLE 3: DIMENSIONS OF THE SERVQUAL INSTRUMENT

Variables and Constructs

Factor

Loading

Empathy (α =0.82)

EMP1

Doctors have genuine concern about patients

0.57

EMP2 Doctor care their patients 0.63

EMP3 Staff and nurses care the patient

0.58

EMP4

Hospital put their best efforts to provide comfort to patients 0.66

Tangible (α=0.77)

TNG1

Hygienic conditions at hospital

0.59

TNG2 Waiting facilities for attendants and patients

0.53

TNG3 Healthy environment at hospital

0.51

TNG4 Cleanliness of toilets/bathrooms

0.66

TNG5 Cleanliness in wards/rooms (sheets, floor)

0.69

TNG6 Lab and pharmacy facilities within the hospital 0.57

Assurance (α=0.82)

ASS1 Doctor‘s expertise and skills

0.50

ASS2 Thorough investigations of the patient 0.68

ASS3 Doctors almost make right diagnoses 0.64

ASS4 Doctors go for expert opinion in critical cases 0.59

ASS5 Accuracy in lab reports 0.53

ASS6 Special attention to emergency patients 0.58

Timeliness (α=0.73)

TIM1

Patients are observed according to appointment 0.48

TIM2 In time delivery of reports/services 0.65

TIM3 Doctors/Staff observe the promised time 0.53

Responsiveness (α =0.75)

RES1 Doctors/staff efficiently respond to the patients

0.62

RES2 Doctors/Staff are willing to help/facilitate the

patients

0.52

RES3 Feedback mechanism 0.57


29

Model fit summary of the variable studied provides that chi-square value is 517.316, degree of

freedom is 209 and the p-value is 0.000 and normed-chi square is 2.561. As the values of

normed-chi square between 1 and 3 indicate that proposed model is providing a sufficient

presentation of the relationship among the studied variables (Seo, Han, & Lee, 2005). The value

of goodness of fit index for this model (GFI) is 0.78 and therefore, the values greater than 0.70

provides a good fit (Judge & Hulin, 1993). Value of the comparative fit (CFI) for this model is

0.76, therefore, this value lies between 0 and 1, so value from 0 .00 to 1.00 and the value close to

zero indicates a well fit model and its value close to 1.00 indicate a very good fit (Bentler, 1990;

Hu & Bentler, 1999). Root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) for this model is 0.07

indicates a good model, as value of RMSEA 0.05 indicates a close fit and value less than 0.08

represents a good model (Browne & Cudeck, 1993; Byrne, 2001). According to the above

discussion we can say that overall proposed structural model is a fair representation of patient

perception about service quality.

Figure 1: Proposed Model


30

EMP1

EMP2

EMP3

`EMP4

TANG1

TANG2

TANG3

TANG4

TANG5

TANG6

ASSU1

ASSU2

ASSU3

ASSU4

ASSU5

ASSU6

TIME1

TIME2

TIME3

RESP1

RESP2

RESP3

Assurance

Tangibles

Empathy

Servi

ce

Quali

ty

Timeliness

Responsiveness


31

With respect to the first construct, empathy has a direct positive effect on service quality

and the factors like doctor‘s genuine concern for their patients (0.57*0.82 =0.47). The

factors like doctor care their patients (0.63*0.82=0.52), nurses and supporting staff care

their patients (0.58*0.82=0.48), hospital put their best effort to provide comfort to their

patients (0.66*0.82=0.54) has direct positive effect on service quality. The standardized

regression weight of the construct empathy is 0.81. Therefore, these results support the

hypothesis H1 that patient perception about empathy has a positive impact on service

quality.

With respect to the 2nd construct, tangible has a direct positive effect on service quality,

as all the variables representing this construct also has a direct positive impact on service

quality. The regression weight for this construct is 0.77 which support our hypothesis H2

that the level of tangible has a positive impact on service quality.

With respect to the third construct, assurance all the items has a positive direct impact on

the service quality. The regression weight for this construct is 0.82 which support our

hypothesis H3 that assurance has a positive impact on service quality.

With respect to the fourth construct, timeliness all the items representing this construct

are depicting positive values, therefore timeliness has a positive direct impact on the

service quality. The regression weight for this construct is 0.87 which support our

hypothesis H4 that assurance has a positive impact on service quality.

Last construct responsiveness, all the items representing this construct are depicting

positive values, therefore, responsiveness has a direct positive impact on service quality.

The regression weight for this construct is 0.72 which support our hypothesis H5 that

responsiveness has a positive impact on service quality.


32

TABLE 4: Correlation among the service quality Dimensions

Empat

hy

Tangibl

e

Assuran

ce

Timeliness Responsive

ness

Empathy Pearson

correlation

Sig.2 tailed

N

1

320

.674‖

.000

320

.607‖

.000

320

.541‖

.000

320

.656‖

.000

320

Tangible Pearson

correlation

Sig.2 tailed

N

.674‖

.000

320

1

.000

320

.623‖

.000

320

.617‖

.000

320

.668‖

.000

320

Assurance Pearson

correlation

Sig.2 tailed

N

.607‖

.000

320

.623‖

.000

320

1

320

.629‖

.000

320

.583‖

.000

320

Timeliness Pearson correlation

Sig.2 tailed

N

.541‖

.000

320

.617‖

.000

320

.629‖

.000

320

1

320

.582‖

.000

320

Responsiveness Pearson

correlation

Sig.2 tailed

N

.656‖

.000

320

.668‖

.000

320

.583‖

.000

320

.582‖

.000

320

1

320


33

Table 4 provides information regarding correlation between the five service quality dimensions

namely; empathy, tangibles, assurance, timeliness and responsiveness. The highest correlation

between the variables among all the variables (constructs) is between empathy and tangible and

is 69.7%, which indicates that there is a positive and strong correlation among the two variables.

It means that infrastructure and sufficient facilities available to human resource (like doctors,

nurses and supporting staff) at hospitals helps to increase the empathy level among them which

creates a positive impact on increased quality of services to the patients. It is also observed that

p-value between these two variables is 0.000 indicates that there is a strong correlation among

these variables. Since p-value between two variables is 0.000 so it can be conclude that at 1%

level of significant the correlation between tangible and empathy is significant and it is the

strongest correlation among all the variables. The weakest correlation is 53.1% among timeliness

and empathy, however, the correlation is positive among them and the p-value among the

variables is 0.000 indicating a significant correlation among them at 1% level of significant.

DISCUSSIONS

From the above results generated from Amos 16.0 and path diagram, shows that patient perceive

that private hospital are delivering quality healthcare services to the patients. All the service

quality constructs empathy, tangible, assurance, timeliness and responsiveness has a positive

impact on service quality of private hospitals. It is also concluded that service quality is a latent

exogenous variable, which is represented by five observed endogenous variables namely,

‗empathy‘, ‗tangible‘, ‗assurance‘, ‗timeliness‘ and ‗responsiveness‘.

Results of the five factors showed that the measurement model for service quality constructs had

a good fit and the model is valid and reliable. Results show that in private hospitals doctors are

genuinely concerned for their patients, doctors and nurses has attentions to care their patients and

private hospitals are putting their maximum efforts in order to provide comforts to their patients.

These variables are representing the first construct empathy and all of these variables have a

positive impact on service quality. Hygienic conditions, cleanliness, hospital environment and

availability of the lab and pharmacy facilities have a positive impact on the service quality and

these variables were representing the second construct tangible. Doctors and supporting staff are

highly qualified and expert in their field and labs are highly equipped and generating accurate

results also have a positive impact on service quality.

Similarly, observation of patients according to appointment, in time delivery of reports and

doctors also observe promised time also have a positive impact on service quality and finally,

efficiently response to patients calls, willingness to help and facilitate the patients and feedback

mechanism also have a positive impact on service quality.

The above results indicate that service quality in private hospitals is meeting patients‘

satisfactions. It is evident from the literature that private hospitals in Egypt are delivering better

quality of services as compare to public hospitals (Mostafa, 2005). Similarly, the hospitals in

Bangladesh are providing better healthcare services as compare to public hospitals and foreign

hospitals are far better than public and private hospitals (Andaleeb, 2000). These results also

validate our study, that private hospitals are delivering better healthcare services.


34

FURTHER RESEARCH:

This study enables us to know only the satisfaction of the patient in private hospitals and not in

the public hospitals so the study may also be conducted in government hospitals to check the

quality of healthcare. This result shows that apart from the treatment part (clinical) the non

clinical (emotional) aspects should also be considered for maintaining the patient loyalty and

patient retention.

REFERENCES:

1. Pandeya, Radhieka (2007) ―Outside the Sick Bay,‖ Business Standard.

2. ―Health in India, Emerging Market Report: 2007‖, PricewaterhouseCoopers.

3. Free Wikipedia, website: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chennai on 7/7/12

4. Free Wikipedia, website: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamilnadu on 7/7/12

5. Riadh Ladhari (2009), ―A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research‖, International

Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 172-198.

6. Rust, R. and Zahorik, A. (1993), ―Customer satisfaction, customer retention and market

share‖, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 193-215.

7. Sachdev, S. B., and Verma, H. V. 2004. Relative importance of service quality. Journal of

Services Research 4(1): 93-116.

8. Scardina S.A. (1994) ―SERVQUAL: A Tool for Evaluating Patient Satisfaction with

Nursing Care‖, Journal of Nursing Care Quality 8(2), 38-46.

9. Seo, Y-W., Han, H-S., & Lee, J-N. (2005) ―A relationship perspective to investigate the

effect of human resource capability on information system outsourcing success‖, Research

and Practice in Human Resource Management, 13(2), 1-15.

10. Berry, L.L., Bennet, D.R. and Brown, C.W. (1989), ―Service Quality: A Profit Strategy for

Financial Institutions‖, Dow-Jones-Irwin, and Homewood, IL.

11. Bitner, M.J., (1990) ―Evaluating service encounters: the effects of physical surroundings and

employee responses‖, Journal of Marketing 54, 69–82.

12. Bollen, K.A. (1989) ―Structural Equations with Latent Variables”. New York: John Wiley.

13. Bollen, K.A., & Long, S.J. (1993) ―Testing Structural Equation Models‖, London: SAGE.

14. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993) ―Alternative ways of assessing model fit‖ In Bollen,

K.A. & Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equations models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.


35

15. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates. Carmen J.M. and Langeard E. (1980). ―Growth Strategies of Service

Firms‖, Strategic Management Journal, 1, 7 - 22.

16. Cook, C., & Thompson, B. (2000), ―Higher-order factor analytic perspectives on users'

perceptions of library service quality‖, Library Information Science Research, Vol. 22,

pp.393-404.

17. Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V., & Berry L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for

measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1): 12–40.

18. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry (1985). "A Conceptual Model of Service

Quality and Its Implications for Future Research." Journal of Marketing 49: 41-50.

19. Ramsaran-Fowdar, Rooma Roshnee. (2008). The Relative Importance of Service Dimensions

in a Healthcare Setting. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 21(1), 104-

124.

20. Reichheld, F. and Sasser, W.E. Jr. (1990), ―Zero defecting: quality comes to services‖,

Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68, pp. 105-11.

21. Reidenbach, E.R. and Sandifer-Smallwood, B. (1990). Exploring Perceptions of Hospital

Operations by a Modified SERVQUAL Approach. Journal of Health Care Marketing 10(4),

47-55.

22. Liljander,V. and Strandvik,T.(1994),‖The relatioinahip between service quality, satisfaction

and intentions‖, in Kunst, P. and Lemmink,J.(eds), Quality management in services II, Van

Gorcum, Assen/Maastricht.

23. Parasuraman,A.,Zeithmal,V.A and Berry ,L.L.(1985),‖A conceptual model of service quality

and its implications for future research‖, Journal of marketing Vol.49 no.10 pp41-50.

HAS THE SERVICE QUALITY IN PRIVATE CORPORATE ...2013/01/02 · the vast majority of the country. Of...

Documents

Transcript of HAS THE SERVICE QUALITY IN PRIVATE CORPORATE ...2013/01/02 · the vast majority of the country. Of...