Harnessing the Power of Teacher Leaders Fort Bend ISD Secondary Curriculum Coordinators Susan...
-
Upload
griffin-bullion -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Harnessing the Power of Teacher Leaders Fort Bend ISD Secondary Curriculum Coordinators Susan...
Harnessing the Power of Teacher Leaders Fort Bend ISD Secondary Curriculum Coordinators Susan Voradakis – Social Studies [email protected]
Perri Segura – Science [email protected] Trisha Peterson – Math [email protected]
Sue Tull – ELA [email protected]
Sharon McGlaun – “Retired” [email protected]
TSSSA Conference – March 30, 2007
Fort Bend ISD Suburban District –
southwest of Houston Secondary Schools:
10 High Schools 12 Middle Schools 2 Alternative Campuses
You might be a coordinator if you… Write curriculum Create assessments Read, research, and attend conferences Organize district staff development Train teachers, department chairs, administrators Read, research, and attend conferences Attend meetings Mentor teachers, department chairs, administrators Read, research, and attend conferences Lead meetings Facilitate, lead, and serve on committees Read, research, and attend conferences….
What is the expected outcome? Understanding of CIA? Implementation of state/district curriculum? Data-driven decision making? Improved test scores? Teacher success? Student Success?
Reality Campuses sometimes operate in reactive rather
than proactive mode (constant remediation of students rather than instruction).
Busy administrators provide little instructional leadership or expectations.
Teachers are expected to “collaborate” before or after school, or they work in isolation.
Data does not impact instruction.
Students do not reach their potential.
…School culture and supervision tend to ignore or
divert teachers from implementing and
continuously improving their mastery of effective
instructional and assessment practices. We don’t
commonly see teaching, followed by assessment,
then adjustment to practice on the basis of assessment
results. Isolation masks the starkly different results
achieved by different teachers.
- Mike Schmoker, Results Now
Think Pair Share
How do you make the TEKS the focus of classroom instruction and assessment?
How do you bring about systemic change within a content area, grade level, and school?
The good news is that we know what to do.
Education research has equipped us with
abundant evidence on instructional and
leadership strategies that are likely to result
in improved student achievement.
– Doug Reeves, “Closing the Implementation Gap”
Effective Practice
Marzano – High Yield Strategies DuFour – PLC Schmoker – Collaborative Planning Gardner – Learning Styles Tomlinson – Differentiated Instruction McTighe & Wiggins - UBD And many others …
Putting It All Together: One High School’s Results
2005 TAKSMet Standard at Panel Rec.
2006 TAKSMet Standard at Panel Rec. Difference
9th Grade Math 41% 26% -15
10th Grade Math 30% 42% +12
11th Grade Math 49% 64% +15
10th Science 23% 35% +12
11th Science 44% 54% +10
10th Social Studies 72% 76% +4
11th Social Studies 85% 93% +8
9th ELA 74% 78% +4
10th ELA 52% 80% +28
11th ELA 83% 86% +3
Discuss the slide with your neighbor.
Write down any questions that you have based on the data.
The purpose of the presentation is to demonstrate
how to make a difference at the campus level by –
1. Impacting teachers directly, through teacher leaders. These leaders, rather than coordinators or other administrators, relay information and implement district expectations.
2. Implementing the TLC model of collaborative planning, deeper understanding of the curriculum, and reflective practices that drive instruction.
TLC
Teacher Leadership Corps
History of the Program
Beginnings
Year 1 – one school
Year 2 – four schools
TLC Campus Structure
Principal
ELA TeamEnglish IEnglish IIEnglish IIIReading
Math TeamAlgebra IGeometryAlgebra II
Science TeamIPC
BiologyChemistry
Social StudiesWorld Geography
World HistoryU.S. History
Campus Coordinator(Dean, AP)
Lead TLC
Self Reflection Do you have a similar structure?
What do team leaders do?
Do teams meet regularly?
What is the focus of the meetings?
Do teachers grow, does instruction improve, are student scores going up as the result of team meetings?
How is TLC Different?
“I have been a part of small learning communitieswhich addressed cross curricular learning themesto motivate students and staff. This TLC initiative isdifferent as it affects students by affectingteachers’ instruction. That can be a sensitive areafor the unwilling. However, it is the most powerfuland most necessary. Mediocre instructionproduces mediocre students. We owe ourselvesand our students more than that.”
- TLC Teacher
Goals of TLC Short term - Improve student achievement on
TAKS
Long term – Focus on TEKS and enhance classroom instruction
Long term – Develop effective peer coaching networks to support teachers and students.
Tools of TLC Curriculum Calendar with target student
expectations
Collaborative Team Planning Form – focus on TEKS
Mini Assessments – collect information on impact of instruction
Data Reporting Forms – collect data to determine next course of action
Target SE’s Develop team curriculum calendar for entire
year
Identify areas for improvement –target SE’s
Plot target SE’s for specific instruction and assessment on team calendar
Can’t fix all problems, but have to start somewhere
Sample Calendar
Collaborative Team Planning Process Teams meet at least once per week
Not just lesson planning
Collaborating/discussing instruction
Creating time in the schedule does not create buy-in or understanding
Teachers/Administrators in Attendance:
Reflections:What worked last week and what didn’t?Why? And now what?
Student Expectations:Which one of the tested TEKS are you going to focus on this week? Write it out.
Analysis of TAKS Assessment: (1)How was this Student Expectation tested on TAKS? (2)What did you learn by looking at the tested items?(3)What skills must be used by students to successfully answer the items? Teacher Assessment:(1)How will you continuously determine whether your students learned what was expected at the level of TEKS/TAKS?(2)Will you give a mini-assessment? If so, attach the items.
Teaching Strategies:What teaching strategies will you use to move students to the level expected of them on TAKS?
Activities:What do you expect the students to do?
Monitor and Adjust:What will you do if the students do not learn it?
Focused Collaborative Team PlanningDate: Team:
Teachers/Administrators in Attendance:
Reflections:What worked last week and what didn’t?Why? And now what?
Students did poorly on warm-up questions covering 13 th, 14th, 15th amendments. The warm-ups did not include direct instruction.
Student Expectations:Which one of the tested TEKS are you going to focus on this week? Write it out.
US 18B - Evaluate various means of achieving political rights, including the19th, 24th, and 26th amendments.
Analysis of TAKS Assessment: (1)How was this Student Expectation tested on TAKS? (2)What did you learn by looking at the tested items?(3)What skills must be used by students to successfully answer the items? Teacher Assessment:(1)How will you continuously determine whether your students learned what was expected at the level of TEKS/TAKS?(2)Will you give a mini-assessment? If so, attach the items.
1. 03,04,06 – 2/3 questions use cause/effect; 1 question uses excerpt and inferencing
2. Students must relate amendments to their historical context
3. Cause/effect; inference; drawing conclusion
Teaching Strategies:What teaching strategies will you use to move students to the level expected of them on TAKS?
Review/reteach, or teach cause/effect,inferencing, drawing conclusions; review amendment purpose and process; review 13th-15th; introduce 19th, 24th, 26th
Activities:What do you expect the students to do?
Students will choose a suitable Thinking Map organizer that demonstrates cause/effect context for amendments (13th,14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, 26th).
Monitor and Adjust:What will you do if the students do not learn it?
Determine which amendments are confusing to students; develop interactive timeline to review Civil Rights amdmts
Follow-up:List any follow up responsibilities or materials needed and the person responsible for each.
Voradakis – locate questions
McGlaun – adjust calendar
Sample Lesson PlanWeek: April 2 - 6 Instructional Activities
Monday - Tuesday Objectives TEKS: Civil Rights Objectives TAKS:
8.17B/US7A –Trace the historical development of the civil rights movement in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries including the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments
US 18B - Evaluate various means of achieving political rights, including the 19th, 24th, and 26th amendments.
Procedures:1. Review the results of mini-assessment with students. Have students explain why
the distractors are incorrect.2. Skills mini-lesson: C/E, Inferencing, Drawing Conclusions - Jarrett book pp. 3 –
103. Content Lesson: Civil Rights Amendments
1. Station Rotation – each amendment2. Foldable – flip book on amendments3. C/E Thinking Map – each amendment
Assessment(s): Mini Assessment
Mini Assessments TAKS Format Limited to 1-2 SE’s 4-5 questions each Every 3 weeks Can be integrated into regular test or as a stand alone
assessment Can be formative or summative Determine “passing” standard (compare to TAKS) Team decides on rules for administration of tests
Data Analysis Everyone sees everyone’s data
Discuss the results and the reasons for the results
Identify remediation strategies and incorporate into upcoming lesson(s)
“This is definitely the most rewarding program I
have ever been a part of. In looking at what the
team has accomplished so far this year: segmenting and
adapting the curriculum to fit the needs of the students;
incorporating best practices…, aligning our team
goals…, pinpointing problem areas and adapting our
teaching to those needs, I can truly say that TLC has
brought our department a long way.”
- TLC Teacher
Lead TLC Monitor progress of teams through collecting
documentation, meeting with teams, conducting walk-throughs, etc.
Provide support for TLC teachers
Liaison between campus and district administrators
Role of Administrators Provides vehicle for legitimate instructional
leadership
Attend team meetings
Monitor implementation through focused walk-throughs
Provide accountability for all team members
NCREL recommends, based on research on
schools that are making the most progress
with improving student results, that schools
provide teachers with three hours of
collaborative time each week. – SMART Goals
Other Components & Issues
TAKS Support
Coaching
Scheduling
District Support Structure
District TLC Coordinator
ELA“Buddy” Coordinator
Helping Teachers2
Campus Helping Teacher1
MATH“Buddy Coordinator”
Helping Teachers2
Campus Helping Teacher1
SCIENCE“Buddy Coordinator”
Helping Teachers3
Campus Helping Teacher1
SOCIAL STUDIES“Buddy Coordinator”
Helping Teacher1
Campus Helping Teacher1
CAMPUS Meetings DISTRICT MeetingsTeam TLC Lead TLC “Buddy”
Coordinator
TLC
Coordinator Lead weekly team mtgs.
Attend weekly campus TLC mtgs.
Attend district TLC mtgs.
Attend training
Attend weekly team mtgs.
Lead weekly campus TLC mtgs
Attend district lead TLC mtgs.
Attend district TLC mtgs.
Attend training
Attend weekly team mtgs.
Attend weekly campus TLC mtgs
Attend district lead TLC mtgs.
Lead district TLC mtgs.
Attend coordinator mtgs.
Attend training
Attend weekly team mtgs.
Meet with each TLC
Attend weekly campus TLC mtgs
Lead district lead TLC mtgs.
Attend district TLC mtgs.
Lead coordinator mtgs.
Attend training
Teachers must be clear about the connection
between their own learning and improvements in
student learning.
– Joan Richardson, “Think Outside the Clock”
Growing Our TLC’s Book Study Weekly Team Meetings
Share successes Discuss difficulties
Lessons in Leadership Effective Classroom Instruction Training Content Area Trainings
Reflections2005 TAKS
Met Standard at Panel Rec.2006 TAKS
Met Standard at Panel Rec. Difference
9th Grade Math 41% 26% -15
10th Grade Math 30% 42% +12
11th Grade Math 49% 64% +15
10th Science 23% 35% +12
11th Science 44% 54% +10
10th Social Studies 72% 76% +4
11th Social Studies 85% 93% +8
9th ELA 74% 78% +4
10th ELA 52% 80% +28
11th ELA 83% 86% +3
Additional Resources TLC Program Outline TLC Glossary TLC Program – Use of TLC Period Sample Curriculum Calendar Collaborative Team Planning Form Mini Assessment Data Form Mini Assessment Reflections Planning Considerations Tic TAKS Forms – Grades 10 & 11 Resource List