Harmonisation between cohorts: Holy Grail or Fool’s errand.
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
0
Transcript of Harmonisation between cohorts: Holy Grail or Fool’s errand.
Harmonisation between cohorts:Holy Grail or Fool’s errand
Some of the problems:
• Lots of genes with modest effects
• Ergo, lots of genes modifying environmental effects
• Ill-defined outcomes
• Reliance on proximal phenotypes
• (Usually) imprecise exposure measurement
• Size versus detail; Cost!
Bigger studies (combining cohorts)
versus
Better measurement
Combination likely to inflate misclassification
• Genetic
• Outcome
• Exposure
…..therefore, do the gains in sample size compensate for these effects?
Increased power for improved allele classification is not great for relatively common alleles
OUTCOMES - ASTHMA
• Physician diagnosed – direct observation
• Physician diagnosed – parent reported
• Parent-reported symptoms– Many studies have ISAAC or equivalent– GA2LEN survey suggests many studies use
idiosyncratic definitions of eczema & hay fever
What about sub-phenotypes?
Comparison of sRaw in children with no history of wheeze, and unconfirmed and confirmed wheeze.
OUTCOMES – INTERMEDIATE
• Pulmonary function measurements– Equipment, protocols, standards
• Assessment of allergy– SPT v Specific IgE
• Bronchial hyperresponsiveness– Method, data censoring, repeatability
Maternal anxiety score 32 weeks GA
ORadj Asthma ORadj Asthma + BHR
1st quartile 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
2nd quartile 1.36 (1.09-1.71) 1.35 (0.79-2.30)
3rd quartile 1.42 (1.14-1.77) 1.55 (0.93-2.58)
4th quartile 1.65 (1.30-2.08) 2.09 (1.24-3.53)
Stratification of asthma by objective measures, e.g.
EXPOSURES
• Mostly proxy measures (questionnaires, derived variables, modelled)
• Where directly assessed, often focus of one study (diet, pollution, allergen, endotoxin)
• Repeat measures likely to reduce misclassification
• Can we compare different methods?
• Outcome and exposure misclassification have major effect on power to detect interactions
• Some outcomes sufficiently similar between cohorts to allow combined analyses
• Even with ‘objective’ outcomes there are potential problems
• Repeat assessment of exposures can reduce effect of misclassification
The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.