Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes Safer Crack Smoking Resources

20
Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes Safer Crack Smoking Resources Lynne Leonard Emily Meadows, Linda Pelude Joyce Seto, Nick Birkett, Emily Medd HIV Prevention Research Team University of Ottawa

description

Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes Safer Crack Smoking Resources. Lynne Leonard Emily Meadows, Linda Pelude Joyce Seto, Nick Birkett, Emily Medd HIV Prevention Research Team University of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Page 1: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program

Distributes Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Lynne Leonard Emily Meadows, Linda Pelude

Joyce Seto, Nick Birkett, Emily Medd

HIV Prevention Research Team University of Ottawa

Ottawa, Canada

Page 2: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Harms Associated with Smoking Crack

Page 3: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Harms Associated with Smoking Crack

Page 4: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Safer Crack-Smoking InitiativeApril 2005

Page 5: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Safer Crack-Smoking Kit

Page 6: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Methods

•Personal structured interviews with 634 street-recruited active IDUs.

•550 reported smoking crack in previous 6 months. • Interviewed at four time points

6 months PRE 112 crack-smokers 1 month POST 114 crack-smokers 6 months POST 157 crack-smokers

12 months POST 167 crack-smokers•Provided saliva samples for HIV and HCV testing.•Compensated $10 CA.•Extraction NEP program data.

Page 7: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Program Uptake

Immediate, high and sustained• Direct users

80 % 1 month POST

80 % 6 months POST

87 % 12 months POST

• Direct and indirect users

81 % 1 month POST

86 % 6 months POST

94 % 12 months POST p=.003

Page 8: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Impact on Sharing Crack-Smoking Equipment

• Significant decline in sharing crack-smoking equipment

85 % 6 months PRE85 % 1 month POST80 % 6 months POST80 % 12 months POST

p<0.01

• Among “sharers”, significant decline in sharing every time

37 % 6 months PRE31 % 1 month POST12 % 6 months POST13 % 12 months POST

p=0.001

Page 9: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Transitioning

Significant increase in smoking crack• Smoked crack in six months prior to interview

77 % 6 months PRE86 % 1 month POST89 % 6 months POST97% 12 months POST p ≤

0.001

• Frequency of smoking crack since availability of crack-smoking equipment

26 % “more” 6 months POST 29 % “more” 12 months POST

Page 10: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Transitioning

Significant decrease in injecting drugs• Injected drugs in month prior to interview

96 % 6 months PRE84 % 1 month POST78 % 6 months POST78 % 12 months POST p ≤

0.001

• Frequency of injecting since availability of crack-smoking equipment

41 % “less” 6 months POST 40 % “less” 12 months POST

Page 11: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Scaling Up Harm Reduction

6 Months

PRE

1 Month

POST

6 Months

POST

Cumulative12 Months

IDU

ONLY 2,566 723 1,829 4,566

IDU and Smoke Crack

N/A 742 2,040 4,838

Smoke Crack ONLY

N/A 543 1,899 4,469

Page 12: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Conclusions

Significant and sustained community and individual level harm reduction impacts:

• Increased availability and accessibility of resources to reduce the harms associated with smoking crack.

• Decrease in the frequency of engagement in the multi-person use of crack-smoking implements.

• Transitioning to smoking crack – significant predictor of injection cessation.

• Contact with previously un-engaged population at risk of the harms associated with drug use.

• Evaluation findings suggest the urgent utility of replicating this initiative at all NEPs.

Page 13: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Acknowledgements

Research Team• Interviewers I-Track Project• Women and men in Ottawa who inject

drugsFunders

• Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Public Health Agency of Canada

• City of Ottawa Public Health• Institut National de Santé Publique,

Québec• Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN)

Page 14: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

ADDITIONAL SLIDES

Page 15: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Socio-demographic Profile

AgeAverage 37 years; range 16 – 63

GenderMale 77%

EthnicityCanadian 79% Aboriginal 11%

Highest education levelLess than high school 50%Some post secondary 23%

HousingUnstable housing 48%

Page 16: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Socio-demographic Profile

History HIV testing 87%

Positive HIV Lab result 11%

History HCV testing 85%

Positive HCV Lab result 55%

Page 17: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Socio-demographic Profile

Drugs injected most often in past 6 monthscocaine 35%crack 22%morphine 31%heroin 4%

Age first smoked crackmean 25 years range 7 – 54 years

Duration smoking crackmean 10 yearsrange 1 month – 49 years

Page 18: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Resource Costs

Cost

Glass stem 30 cents

Mouthpiece 4 cents

Screens 8 cents

Complete kit 2 dollars

Page 19: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Distribution

One Month

Six Months

TwelveMonths

Crack kits 1,419 183 42

Glass stems 7,212 17,696 28,768

Screens 9,185 32,557 52,001

Mouthpieces 3,123 8,123 9,306

Page 20: Harm Reduction Success as Needle Exchange Program Distributes  Safer Crack Smoking Resources

Results: Distribution

One Month

Six Months

Twelve Months

#s

Dist.

Crack Kits 90% 81% 30% 1,644

Glass Stems 52% 97% 97% 53,678

Screens 51% 88% 88% 93,745

Mouthpieces 34% 56% 52% 20,552