Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University

15
Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University Jack F. Douglas, James A. Warren National Institute of Standards and Technology Glass-Like Behavior in General Glass-Like Behavior in General Grain Boundary During Migration Grain Boundary During Migration

description

Glass-Like Behavior in General Grain Boundary During Migration. Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University Jack F. Douglas, James A. Warren National Institute of Standards and Technology. Are General Grain Boundaries Glassy?. General Boundaries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University

Page 1: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Hao Zhang1, David J. Srolovitz1,2

1 Princeton University

2 Yeshiva University

Jack F. Douglas, James A. Warren

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Glass-Like Behavior in General Glass-Like Behavior in General

Grain Boundary During MigrationGrain Boundary During Migration

Page 2: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Are General Grain Boundaries Are General Grain Boundaries Glassy?Glassy?•General Boundaries

• Exclude low angle, low and coherent twin grain boundaries

•Structure

• “Amorphous-cement” model suggested that the metal grains in cast iron were “cemented” together by a thin layer of ‘amorphous’ material (Rosenhain and Ewen, J I Met. 10 119,1913)

• The RDF suggests liquid like structure at high T (Wolf, Phys Rev Lett. 77 2965, 1996; Curr Opin Solid St M. 5 435, 2001; Acta Mater. 53 1, 2005 )

• Others show partial crystalline structure (Gleiter, Phys Rev B. 35 9085, 1987; Appl Phys Lett. 50 472, 1987; Van Swygenhoven , Phys Rev B. 62 831, 2000 )

•Dynamics• Grain boundary viscosity (Ashby, Surf Sci. 31 498, 1972 )• Grain boundary migration and diffusion suggests structural transition

temperature (Wolf, Acta Mater. 53 1, 2005 )• self-diffusion in the grain-boundary suggested that the diffusion

mechanism is similar to that in bulk metallic glasses (Mishin, J Mater

Sci. 40 3155, 2005 )

Page 3: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Simulation DetailsSimulation Details

• Molecular dynamics in NVT ensemble

• EAM-type (Voter-Chen) potential for Ni

• [010] tilt general grain boundary with

=40.23º

• Periodic boundary conditions in x and

y

• One grain boundary & two free

surfaces

• Fixed strain, xx and yy

• Source of driving force is the elastic

energy difference due to crystal

anisotropy

• Driving force is constant during

simulation

(001)

(001)

X

Z

Y

Page 4: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Grain Boundary MigrationGrain Boundary Migration

• Grain boundary migration tends to be continuous at high temperature, while shows “intermittent” at lower temperature

• The waiting period becomes longer as temperature decreasing

Page 5: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Mobility vs. T – Arrhenius?Mobility vs. T – Arrhenius?

*0/ exp

B

Qv p M

k T

OR

*

0

/ exp VFVF

B

Qv p M

k T T

• Temperature dependence of grain boundary mobility can be nicely fitted into Vogel-Fulcher Form, which is commonly used in super-cooled liquid system

• T0 denotes the temperature that mobility disappears

Page 6: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

• The atom is treated as mobile if

• Find string pair among mobile atoms

using

• The Weight-averaged mean string

length:

2 , ,n t n P n t nP n t

0 00.35 0 1.2i ir t rr r

0min 0 , 0 0.43i j i jt t r r r r r

Catch Strings and Determine their Catch Strings and Determine their LengthLength

Page 7: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

““Typical” StringsTypical” Strings

Page 8: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

String-like Motion Within Grain String-like Motion Within Grain BoundaryBoundary

• String-like cooperative motion within grain boundary is significant at low temperature

• The fraction of non-trivial strings in the mobile atoms can be over 40% at 780K

Page 9: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

String Length vs. TemperatureString Length vs. Temperature

•String length

distribution function

P(n) follows

exp(-n/<n>)

• grain boundaries

have shorter strings,

therefore they are less

frustrated than general

grain boundaries

•String length increases

as temperature

decreasing, similar

behavior is found in

supercooled liquids

Page 10: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

““Intermittent” Migration BehaviorIntermittent” Migration Behavior

Page 11: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

X

Z

Y

X

Y

Z

MovieMovie

Page 12: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

GB

StepsGB

GB

Stage I

Stage II

Migration Mechanism at Low TMigration Mechanism at Low T

• Grain boundary migration at low T is associated with nucleation of steps/terrace

Page 13: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

Further ObservationsFurther Observations

• “Selected” migration region can be best described by Arrhenius law

• The activation energy is about 0.37 eV (smaller than the apparent activation energy)

Page 14: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

t

GB

P

osit

ion

1 2

L

•Overall Migration

1 2 1 2

/ 1/

/ 1/

L pv p

p L M

* 22 2/ exp

B

Qv p M

k T

• Since the migration region follows Arrhenius

21 *

2

1/

1/ exp

B

v pQ

p LM k T

Grain Boundary Migration ModelGrain Boundary Migration Model

Page 15: Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1  Princeton University 2  Yeshiva University

ConclusionConclusion

• Temperature dependence of Grain boundary migration in

general tilt boundaries is found to be described by Vogel-

Fulcher relation, which is characteristic in glass-forming

liquid

• String-like atomic motion in grain boundaries is similar to

those in liquid system

• It is reasonable to believe that string-like cooperative

motion dominates the rate of grain boundary migration at

low T

• The migration model suggests grain boundary migration is

controlled by different atomistic mechanisms. The waiting

period is associated with the nucleation of steps.