Temperature Dependence of Grain Boundary Migration in 3-D Hao Zhang David J. Srolovitz
Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University
description
Transcript of Hao Zhang 1 , David J. Srolovitz 1,2 1 Princeton University 2 Yeshiva University
Hao Zhang1, David J. Srolovitz1,2
1 Princeton University
2 Yeshiva University
Jack F. Douglas, James A. Warren
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Glass-Like Behavior in General Glass-Like Behavior in General
Grain Boundary During MigrationGrain Boundary During Migration
Are General Grain Boundaries Are General Grain Boundaries Glassy?Glassy?•General Boundaries
• Exclude low angle, low and coherent twin grain boundaries
•Structure
• “Amorphous-cement” model suggested that the metal grains in cast iron were “cemented” together by a thin layer of ‘amorphous’ material (Rosenhain and Ewen, J I Met. 10 119,1913)
• The RDF suggests liquid like structure at high T (Wolf, Phys Rev Lett. 77 2965, 1996; Curr Opin Solid St M. 5 435, 2001; Acta Mater. 53 1, 2005 )
• Others show partial crystalline structure (Gleiter, Phys Rev B. 35 9085, 1987; Appl Phys Lett. 50 472, 1987; Van Swygenhoven , Phys Rev B. 62 831, 2000 )
•Dynamics• Grain boundary viscosity (Ashby, Surf Sci. 31 498, 1972 )• Grain boundary migration and diffusion suggests structural transition
temperature (Wolf, Acta Mater. 53 1, 2005 )• self-diffusion in the grain-boundary suggested that the diffusion
mechanism is similar to that in bulk metallic glasses (Mishin, J Mater
Sci. 40 3155, 2005 )
Simulation DetailsSimulation Details
• Molecular dynamics in NVT ensemble
• EAM-type (Voter-Chen) potential for Ni
• [010] tilt general grain boundary with
=40.23º
• Periodic boundary conditions in x and
y
• One grain boundary & two free
surfaces
• Fixed strain, xx and yy
• Source of driving force is the elastic
energy difference due to crystal
anisotropy
• Driving force is constant during
simulation
(001)
(001)
X
Z
Y
Grain Boundary MigrationGrain Boundary Migration
• Grain boundary migration tends to be continuous at high temperature, while shows “intermittent” at lower temperature
• The waiting period becomes longer as temperature decreasing
Mobility vs. T – Arrhenius?Mobility vs. T – Arrhenius?
*0/ exp
B
Qv p M
k T
OR
*
0
/ exp VFVF
B
Qv p M
k T T
• Temperature dependence of grain boundary mobility can be nicely fitted into Vogel-Fulcher Form, which is commonly used in super-cooled liquid system
• T0 denotes the temperature that mobility disappears
• The atom is treated as mobile if
• Find string pair among mobile atoms
using
• The Weight-averaged mean string
length:
2 , ,n t n P n t nP n t
0 00.35 0 1.2i ir t rr r
0min 0 , 0 0.43i j i jt t r r r r r
Catch Strings and Determine their Catch Strings and Determine their LengthLength
““Typical” StringsTypical” Strings
String-like Motion Within Grain String-like Motion Within Grain BoundaryBoundary
• String-like cooperative motion within grain boundary is significant at low temperature
• The fraction of non-trivial strings in the mobile atoms can be over 40% at 780K
String Length vs. TemperatureString Length vs. Temperature
•String length
distribution function
P(n) follows
exp(-n/<n>)
• grain boundaries
have shorter strings,
therefore they are less
frustrated than general
grain boundaries
•String length increases
as temperature
decreasing, similar
behavior is found in
supercooled liquids
““Intermittent” Migration BehaviorIntermittent” Migration Behavior
X
Z
Y
X
Y
Z
MovieMovie
GB
StepsGB
GB
Stage I
Stage II
Migration Mechanism at Low TMigration Mechanism at Low T
• Grain boundary migration at low T is associated with nucleation of steps/terrace
Further ObservationsFurther Observations
• “Selected” migration region can be best described by Arrhenius law
• The activation energy is about 0.37 eV (smaller than the apparent activation energy)
t
GB
P
osit
ion
1 2
L
•Overall Migration
1 2 1 2
/ 1/
/ 1/
L pv p
p L M
* 22 2/ exp
B
Qv p M
k T
• Since the migration region follows Arrhenius
21 *
2
1/
1/ exp
B
v pQ
p LM k T
Grain Boundary Migration ModelGrain Boundary Migration Model
ConclusionConclusion
• Temperature dependence of Grain boundary migration in
general tilt boundaries is found to be described by Vogel-
Fulcher relation, which is characteristic in glass-forming
liquid
• String-like atomic motion in grain boundaries is similar to
those in liquid system
• It is reasonable to believe that string-like cooperative
motion dominates the rate of grain boundary migration at
low T
• The migration model suggests grain boundary migration is
controlled by different atomistic mechanisms. The waiting
period is associated with the nucleation of steps.