HA as the Principal Component of a Influenza Vaccine Program...–Progress into clinic with COBRA...
Transcript of HA as the Principal Component of a Influenza Vaccine Program...–Progress into clinic with COBRA...
7/14/2014
1
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Elicitation of broadly-reactive HA head antibodies to seasonal and pandemic viruses by COBRA vaccines
Second WHO Integrated Meeting on development and clinical trials of Influenza vaccines that induce broadly
protective and long-lasting immune responses 5th – 7th May 2014
Geneva, Suisse
1 V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Program Hypothesis
Universal influenza vaccines can be rationally engineered
to elicit broadly cross-neutralizing epitopes Universal antigens can be used in pre-immune hosts to re-focus the immune response,
preferentially recalling broadly neutralizing antibodies that provides breadth against multiple
strains within a subtype
Universal antigens can also be delivered with appropriate technologies to stimulate durable
and long-lasting immunity
Antigen
Selection
Production & Delivery System
Adjuvant
(Formulation)
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
HA as the Principal Component of a Universal Influenza Vaccine
Immune-refocusing of HA to increase breadth
Promote immunogenicity of the known broadly neutralizing stem epitopes
Identify head sequences which stimulate broadly neutralizing Abs
Benefits: Anti-head response against receptor binding site potent and MOA of current vaccine Accepted surrogate marker (HAI) Risks: Breadth may be narrower than anti-stem approaches
Benefits: Breadth may reach across groups of influenza Risks: Not as potent as anti-head, higher amount of functional anti-stem Abs needed Disease modulating? No surrogate marker identified
HEAD:
STEM:
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Influenza Vaccine Program
Vaccines: A goal of influenza vaccine development is the elicitation of cross-protective immunity. It is currently impossible to predict which antigenic variants may emerge and therefore an ideal vaccine will elicit immunity to most potential variants.
Pandemic Influenza: H5N1, H7N9, H2N2
Broadly-reactive HA immunogens
Seasonal Influenza: H1N1, H3N2, and B Broadly-reactive HA immunogens/ Universal influenza platforms
100 µm
HA M1 NA
4
7/14/2014
2
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
H5N1 Background
• Initially emerged in poultry and humans in 1997
• Diversity within subtype
– 10 phylogenetic clades
– Geographically distinct
– Human infections from
clades 0, 1, 2 and 7
Total Clade Distribution
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
1
2
0
Giles et al. 2012. J. Inf. Dis. 205(10):1562-70.
Giles et al. 2012. Clin Vacc Immunol. 19(2):128-39. Giles et al.. 2011. J. Virol. 86:1500-1513. Giles BM and Ross TM. 2011. Vaccine. 29:3043-54.
5 V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Antigen Design
• Computationally Optimized Broadly Reactive Antigen (COBRA) – Align amino acid sequences from Clade 2 human isolates – Assemble ‘Layered’ Consensus – Limit sampling bias
• Confirm presence of conserved linear epitopes – (Immune epitope database; www.immuneepitope.org)
Giles and Ross. 2011. Vaccine. 29:3043-54
6
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Mouse Antibody Responses
0 3 5 6
V V B C
8-12 week
BALB/c 3ug HA + Alum
Giles and Ross. 2011. Vaccine. 29:3043-54
7 V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
NHP Immunogenicity Breadth (HAI)
Receptor Blocking Antibody(HAI Titers)
Clade 0
(HK/4
83/97)
Clade 1
(HK/2
13/03)
Clade 1
(VN/1
203/04)
Clade 2
.1.1
(Dk/H
U/02)
Clade 2
.1.3
(IN/0
5/05)
Clade 2
.2.1
(Eg/3
21/07)
Clade 2
.2.1
(Eg/3
300/08)
Clade 2
.2.2
(Tk/E
G/0
7)
Clade 2
.2.2
(Tk/T
k/05)
Clade 2
.2.2
(WS/0
5)
Clade 2
.2.2
(BHG
/1/0
5)
Clade 2
.3.2
(CM
P/HK/0
7)
Clade 2
.3.2
(Buz/
Bul/10)
Clade 2
.3.4
(JW
E/1038/0
6)
Clade 2
.3.4
(AN/1
/05)
Clade 4
(Gs/1
175/06)
Clade 7
(Ck/V
N/08)
Clade 2
.0 C
OBRA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Whooper Swan Clade 2.2 VLP
COBRA VLP
Mock (Alum Only)
*** p<0.001
** p<0.01
* p<0.05
0 1 2.1 2.2 2.3 4 7
** ***
***
****
****
*** **
******
**
Virus
HA
I GM
T (
Lo
g2)
Giles et al. 2012. Clin Vaccine Immunol.19:128-39.
8
7/14/2014
3
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Part I: COBRA 1st Generation
0 3 5 6
V V B C
Challenged with A/Whooper Swan/Mongolia/244/2005; Clade 2.2.
Day 3 post-infection
Giles et al. 2012. J. Inf. Dis. 205(10):1562-70.
9 V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Human COBRA-2 Human/Avian COBRA-2 All H5 COBRA
SiteASiteBSiteCSiteDSiteE
Globular Head (HA1)
Stem (HA2)
Hemagglutinin Structure • 5-10% diversity between
clades • COBRA diversity 1.5% • Receptor binding antibody (similar yet different)
• Can we utilize empirical
data and sequence information to structurally design antigens for increased breadth and viral coverage?
Crevar et al. Manuscript in progress.
Second Generation H5N1 COBRA Vaccines
10
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
H5N1 COBRA Ferret Experiments using human/avian H5N1 COBRA-2
and All H5N1 COBRA vaccines
Second Generation
H5N1 COBRA Hemagglutination Inhibition Titers to H5N1
Clade 1
(VN/1
203/04)
Clade 1
.1 (C
am/V
0813302/11
Clade 2
.1.3
(IN/0
5/05)
Clade 2
.1.3
.2 (I
N/NIH
RD1949/12)
Clade 2
.2 (W
S/244/0
5)
Clade 2
.2 (T
k/Tk/0
5)
Clade 2
.2.1
(Egy/3
21/07)
Clade 2
.2.1
(Egy/3
300/08)
Clade 2
.2.1
(Hubei/1
/10
Clade 2
.2.1
.1 (T
k/Isr/3
62/11)
Clade 2
.2.2
(Bng/3
233/11)
Clade 2
.3.4
(AN/1
/05)
Clade 2
.3.4
(JW
E/1038/0
6
Clade 2
.3.2
.1 (E
gy/N02038/1
0
Clade 2
.3.2
.1 (D
k/VN/L
BM140/1
2)
Clade 7
(Ck/V
N/08)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Human COBRA-2
Human-Avian COBRA-2
All H5 COBRA
V iral Strain
Lo
g 2
HA
I Tit
er Whooper Swan
*
*
**
* *
*
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
* p<0.05
Ferret Immunogenicity Breadth of HAI
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Summary
• An HA head-based approach has potential to replace SOC – Induces protection (vaccine efficacy) to a level comparable to SOC vaccines against
WHO recommended strains, AND – Demonstrates breath of protection by providing consistent efficacy across
types/subtypes against drifted/mismatched strains
• New approaches for re-engineering HA have been
demonstrated to increase breadth of neutralizing antibody response in pre-clinical studies – COBRA antigens increase breadth of Ab response over wild-type HA
• Determining clinical POC in human translational studies is
feasible – Progress into clinic with COBRA split-INV for POC – Assess whether or not COBRA antigens stimulate breath of immune response in
humans as expected from pre-clinical animal model data
7/14/2014
4
V A C C I N E & G E N E T H E R A P Y I N S T I T U T E
Acknowledgements
• VGTI Florida –Donald Carter –Corey Crevar
–Greg Kirchenbaum
–Terianne Wong –Chalise Bloom
–Bradford Lefoley –Chris Darby
–Neha Reddy –Kevin Lee
–Rayleigh Chan
• University of Pittsburgh –Dilhari DeAlmeida –Kirsten Schneider-Orhum
–Brendan Giles
–Xian-Chun Tang –Brooke Pierce
Department of NeuroPathology Clayton Wiley Stephanie Bissel
New York University Elodie Ghedin
Icahn Mt. Sinai School of Medicine Florian Krammer
UPMC Shanta Zimmer Rick Zimmerman Kerry Empey
13
Influenza Projects Supported by:
NIH/NIAID NSF DoD PATH Vaccine Solutions Sanofi-Pasteur