H810 TMA02
-
Upload
angela-phillips -
Category
Education
-
view
205 -
download
3
description
Transcript of H810 TMA02
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
As part of H810 I have been asked to design an accessible online learning resource for my educational
context. My educational context is teaching mathematics to 11 to 18 year old students within a secondary
school. In my context we often set online homework tasks such as www.mymaths.co.uk (My Maths Ltd,
2012) and functional tasks (Queensbury School, 2012). I have designed a task that I could use, both in an
internet enabled classroom or to be completed online in the students own time.
As an Advanced Skills Mathematics Teacher (AST), my role involved designing mathematically rich and
engaging learning activities. It is important that activities engage the learner and that the learner has
the opportunity to learn individually and collectively (Sfard, 1998). Before I started designing the
learning activity, I decided that an accessible activity should give all learners the same opportunity to
work individually and collaboratively. In my opinion it is important that educators don’t design substandard
learning activities in order to ensure that they are accessible. It is the educators responsibility to make
mathematically rich, engaging activities accessible.
I therefore decided that I would design an activity with the following features:
The activity had to be mathematically rich;
The activity must encourages the students to investigate different mathematical concepts;
The students are able to use different technologies;
The students are able to make choices about their learning, for example the technology they use
and the questions they answer;
The students must differentiate the questions that they choose to ensure they achieve, but are
still challenged;
The students must access which elements of the mathematics curriculum they have covered; and,
The students are able to collaborate as well as working individually.
I decided that once I had designed the activity I would then address the accessibility issues that arose.
I started designing the activity by setting out the learning outcomes that I would like to address with the
activity. As a teacher in a secondary school, learning outcomes are expected to be written in a certain
style. All activities must have ‘all students’, ‘some students’ and ‘most students’ for learning outcomes.
This style of learning outcome relates to the students mathematical ability, not any other difficulties a
student may experience. It is the teachers responsibility to ensure the students with specific needs are
able to access the full activity, not just part of the activity.
Once the learning outcomes were formulated I decided how I could ensure the students would meet the
learning outcomes. I chose a photograph of a real life situation that would be familiar to most students.
The photograph was of a storage facility in a car park for supermarket trolleys, which housed rows of
shopping trolleys. The students would then be encouraged to think of mathematical questions relating to
the photograph.
The PowerPoint, that supplements the learning activity, shows three mathematical question that I thought
may help the students to come up with questions of their own. The three questions all relate to the
picture, but some would need further information to ensure an answer is sensible.
Once the students had been given time to come up with several questions of their own, relating to the
picture, they were directed to a Wallwisher (Xiphar, 2008) webpage. On the Wallwisher page students
would be expected to post their own questions relating to the picture. Students would be given a free
choice as to how they wish to share their questions. Some of the possible options are:
Text;
Pictures;
Video; and,
Audio files.
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
In my experience, students are more motivated to participate with activities if they are able to make
choices about how they will contribute.
Once students have been given the opportunity to post their questions on the Wallwisher webpage,
they should then review other students questions. The students would then be expected to choose
three questions to answer, based on the following guidelines:
1) “I can answer...” (Phillips, 2012), where students are certain they can answer the question.
2) “Confident to answer...” (Phillips, 2012), where students are confident in their choice of
mathematical techniques, but not the execution of these techniques.
3) “I’m having a crack at answering...” (Phillips, 2012) where the student is not confident about the
choice of technique chosen.
The students are given links, in the PowerPoint presentation, to relevant information. This information
could assist the students in making assumption in order to solve the problems they have chosen.
Once the students have chosen and answered the questions of their choice, they are to submit the
solution using the media they feel appropriate.
The students would finally be asked to complete a review sheet, to highlight the different types of
mathematics used in solving the three chosen problems.
Once I had completed planning the learning activity I then started to look at where any accessibility
issues could arise. The first issue that I had to address was the problem of using photographs and tables
for students that had visual difficulties. I thought that this could be overcome by a clear description of
the photograph, but soon realised that too much information in the description could lead the students
down certain mathematical routes. For example, if in the description I told the students the number of
trolleys in each row, this may then lead them to describe the amount of wheels on all the trolleys. The
description needed to be written very carefully in order to avoid biased in the students question choice.
I realised that if the students are able to choose how they share information, I am allowing them to
choose their own accessibility.
I had designed the presentation in PowerPoint, which meant that the Office Accessibility Wizard could be
used by students. However, this was not planned as I often use SMART software, which does not have
the same accessibility features as Office.
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Evaluating accessibility
Strengths of the learning resource
Using PowerPoint that can integrate Office Accessibility wizard.
The use of PowerPoint, so text font, colour and backgrounds can be changed.
Hyperlinks included for the students to access further information relating to the topic.
Students can choose how they are going to share their questions, see appendix 1 slide 7. This
enables the students to use the media that is most accessible for them, for example a student
with hearing difficulties may chose to type text, a student with visual difficulties may choose to
record an audio file or a student with dyslexia may choose to record a video.
As students are able to choose the most relevant form of representation (see appendix 1, slide 7)
they are able to participate fully in setting the work. This could engage student and lessen social
exclusion.
Limitations of the learning resource
Strongly coloured patterned background on the PowerPoint presentation, in particular the
photographs on slides 6 and 7 and the coloured boxes on slides 8 and 10 of appendix 1.
Hyperlinks are after the sentences that describe them, see slide 9 appendix 1.
Biased question generation from poorly written descriptions.
When students have to choose questions from the Wallwisher webpage (Xiphar, 2008), they may
have issues accessing certain forms of media, for example a student with hearing difficulties may
not choose a question posted using an audio file as audio may be inaccessible.
3000 words
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Angela Phillips Learning Activity
Slide 1
Slide 2
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Slide 3
Slide 4
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Slide 5
Slide 6
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Slide 7
Slide 8
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Slide 9
Slide 10
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Appendix 2 – Dana Taylor Learning Activity
Main learning Sheet
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Answers For Exercise link
Textual format for exercise
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
Textual format for answers
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
References
My Maths Ltd (2012) Available: www.mymaths.co.uk. (accessed 19 November 2012)
Phillips A (2012) Ange Phillips – Learning Activity
http://learn2.open.ac.uk/mod/forumng/discuss.php?d=276271 (accessed 19 November 2012)
Queensbury School (2012) http://www.queensbury.ngfl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Functional-
Maths_scheme-and-guidance.pdf (accessed 19 November 2012)
Seale, J. (2006) E-Learning and Disability in Higher Education: Accessibility Research and Practice,
Abingdon, Routledge; also available online at http://learn2.open.ac.uk/ mod/ subpage/ view.php?id=153062
(accessed 19 November 2012)
Sfard, A. (1998) ‘Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One’ Educational
Researcher American Educational Research Association, [online] Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.4-13 available from
http://learn2.open.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/164544/mod_resource/content/1/H800_Week3b_OnTwoMetapho
rsforLearning_Sfard.pdf (accessed 19 November 2012)
Taylor D (2012) Dana Taylor’s Resource http://learn2.open.ac.uk/mod/forumng/discuss.php?d=280616
(accessed 19 November 2012)
Xiphar (2008) Wallwisher, http://wallwisher.com/ (accessed 19 November 2012)
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
In Week 10 you are asked to create a self-contained learning resource that could be used by other
students. Details of this activity and the location of other students’ resources are in the module material
for Week 10.
Critically evaluate your own learning resource in the following ways:
1. Briefly describe the resource and its accessibility features. Compare these to one learning resource
created by another student in your tutor group.
2. Evaluate the accessibility of your resource, identifying its strengths and weaknesses. Propose, with
justification, ways in which its accessibility could be improved. (This could include suggesting
alternatives.)
3. Reflect on the processes of creating and evaluating accessible resources. Use the research and
practice literature to explain and understand your experiences of these processes.
Again, remember to give a word count at the end of your assignment
For TMA02, your tutor will allocate marks according to the following criteria and will show on the
Assessment Summary (PT3) form how the marks have been allocated. The first criterion in the table
below relates to your online discussions; the remainder relate to the TMA itself:
1. The extent and quality of your contributions to the tutor group forums during Block 2. Once again,
this could include references to discussions in the general forum. (10 per cent)
2. The clarity and coherence of your written evaluation. (25 per cent)
3. Evidence that you have critically reflected on the process of creating and evaluating accessible
resources. (30 per cent)
4. Your use of the research and practice literature to support your argument. (25 per cent)
5. Your written presentation: accurate use of the author/date referencing system, coherent style,
good grammar and accurate spelling. (10 per cent)
The following table provides an indication of the standards associated with distinction, passing and failing
marks for each of the five criteria.
Criterion Distinction (85–100) Pass (40–84) Fail (0–39)
(1) Contributions
to online
discussions
Effective contributions Relevant contributions Few contributions or none at
all
(2) Written
evaluation
Cogent, focused
presentation of
structured ideas
Clear ideas and a logical
structure
Little or no continuity with
little or no logical
development
(3) Critical
reflection
Strong evidence of
critical reflection,
offering personal
insights into processes
and outcomes
Some evidence of critical
reflection with some
insights into processes
and outcomes
Little or no evidence of
critical reflection or
insights into processes and
outcomes
(4) Use of
literature
Innovative use of
literature, presents new
insights into relevant
issues
Appropriate use of
literature indicating
awareness of relevant
issues
Cites few relevant sources
and shows poor
understanding of relevant
issues
(5) Written
presentation
Clear and accurate
referencing, extensive
vocabulary and accurate
Mostly accurate
referencing, adequate
vocabulary, and mostly
Inaccurate or inadequate
referencing, limited or
misused vocabulary, and
H810 TMA02 Angela Phillips
grammar and spelling accurate grammar and
spelling
many errors of grammar and
spelling