h6
-
Upload
murali-dharan -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
description
Transcript of h6
Chapter 6
1. Nested and Split plot designOne consistent feature of the designs discussed in the course so far is that
the size of the experimental units is the same for all the treatment factors.
However, it is not always desirable or possible to use the same size
experimental units for all the treatment factors. The split-plot design is an
example of a design where the experimental units are of different sizes.
Moreover, in some experiments the levels of one factor (e.g. factor B) are
similar but not identical for different levels of another factor (e.g. factor A).
This arrangement is call a nested or “hierarchical” design. Therefore, this
chapter, unlike the pervious chapters, deals with the analyses of split plot
and nested designs.
6.1 Two Stage Nested DesignIn factorial experiment, the assumption is that one factor can have identical
levels to be combined with the levels of the other factor(s) to form the
treatment combination. However, in certain multifactor experiments the
levels of one factor (say, factor B) are similar but not identical for different
levels of another factor (say, A). Such an arrangement is called a nested, or
hierarchical, design, with the levels of factor B nested under the levels of
factor A.
The statistical model for the two-stage nested design is
y ijk=μ+α i+βj (i )+ε ( ij )k
{¿ j=1,2 , . . .b ¿k=1,2 , . . . .k ¿¿¿ i=1,2 , . . . , a
There are a levels of factor A, b levels of factor B nested under each
level of A, and n replicates. The subscript j(i) indicates that the jth level
of factor B is nested under the ith level of factor A.
This is a balanced nested design because there are an equal number of
levels of B within each level of A and an equal number of replicates.
Because every level of factor B does not appear with every level of
factor A, there can be no interaction between A and B.
The total sum of squares can be partitioned into a sum of squares due to
factor A, a sum of squares due to factor B under the levels of A, and a
sum of squares due to error as
With abn−1 degrees of freedom for SST, a−1degrees of freedom for SSA,
a (b−1 ) degrees of freedom for SSB(A), and ab (n−1 ) degrees of freedom for
error.
Computing formulas for the sums of squares are:
If A and B are fixed, the hypotheses of interest areHo :αi=0and this null
hypothesis can be tested byF=
MSA
MSE . The null hypothesis of Ho : β j (i )=0 is
tested by F=
MSB
MSE
Example: consider a company that purchases its raw material from three
different suppliers. The company wishes to determine if the purity of the raw
material is the same from each supplier. There are four batches of raw
material available from each supplier, and three determinations of purity are
to be taken from each batch. This is two stage nested design as given below.
From ANOVA table, we would conclude that there is no significant effect
on purity due to suppliers, but the purity of batches of raw material from
the same supplier does differ significantly.
6.2 The Split-Plot DesignAn important strategy in agricultural and laboratory experiments of studying
two different experimental factors is to employ the so called split-plot design.
For reasons of convenience or necessity, the levels of one factor (the so
called subplot treatments) are applied to the ultimate, single experimental
units and the levels of the other factor (the so called main-plot treatments)
are applied to set of ultimate units.
Notice that the two factors can essentially be applied at different time. As a
result, a split-plot design can be viewed as two experiments combined or
superimposed on each other. One experiment has the whole-plot factor
applied to large experimental units (or it is a factor whose levels are hard
to change) and the other experiment has subplot factor applied to the
smaller experimental units (or it is a factor whose levels are easy to
change).
In other words, the split-plot design is specifically suited for a two factor
experiment that has more treatments that can be accommodated by a
complete block design. In this design, one of the factors is assigned to the
main-plot (whole-plot). The assigned factor is called the main-plot factor.
The main-plot is divided into subplots (split-plots) to which the second factor,
called the subplot factor, is assigned. Thus, each main-plot becomes a block
for the subplot treatments (i.e., the levels of the subplot factor).
With a split-plot design, the precision for the measurement of the effect of
the main-plot factor is sacrificed to improve that of the subplot factors. In
this design, both the procedures for randomization and that for analysis of
variance are accomplished in two stages one of the main-plot level and
another on the subplot level. At each level, the procedure of
randomized complete block design, as described in chapter 4, are
applicable.
The statistical linear model for split-plot design is
y ijk=μ+α i+β j+γ k+( αβ )ij+(αγ )ik+ ( βγ ) jk+( αβγ )ijk +εijk{¿ j=1,2 , . . .a ¿k=1,2 , . . .b ¿¿¿ i=1,2 , . . , r
Where α i , β i and (αβ )ij represent the whole-plot and correspond respectively
to blocks (or replicates), main-plot (whole-plot) treatment (factor A),
and whole plot error ( or replicates ( or block) x A); and γ k ,
(αγ )ik , ( βγ ) jk and (αβγ )ijk represent the subplots and respectively to the
subplot treatments (factor B), the replicates (or blocks x B and AB
interactions, and the sub plot error (block x AB). Note that the whole plot
error is replicate (or block) x A interaction and the subplot interaction is the
three interaction block x AB.
The sums of squares for these factors are computed as in the three-
way analysis of variance without interaction. What makes a split-plot
design different form other designs with factorial treatment structure? Here
are three ways to think about what makes the split-plot design different.
First, the split-plot has two sizes of units and two separate randomizations.
Whole-plots act as experimental units for one randomization and other
randomization assigns levels of the split-plot factor variety to split-plots. In
this randomization, split-plots act as experimental units, and whole-plots act
as block for the split-plots. In general, there are two types of separate
randomizations, with two different kinds of units that can be identified
before randomization starts. Second, a split-plot randomization can be
done in one stage, assigning factor-level combinations to split-plots in any
whole-plot get the same level of the whole-plot factor and no two split-plots
in the same whole-plot get the same level of the split-plot factor. Thus, a
split-plot design has a restricted randomization. Third, a split-plot is a
factorial design in incomplete blocks with one main effect confounded
with blocks. The whole-plots are the incomplete blocks, and the whole block
factor is confounded with block.
SSblock x B=1a∑
a
∑b
y2. jk− y
2. . .
rab−SSB−SSblock
Example: A paper manufacturer who is interested in three different pulp
preparation methods and four different cooking temperatures for the pulp
and who wishes to study the effect of these two factors on the tensile
strength of the paper. Each replicate of a factorial experiment requires 12
observations, and the experimenter has decided to run three replicates as
given below.
SStotal=∑i=1
r
∑j=1
a
∑k=1
b
y2
ijk− y2. . .
rab=(302+342+ . . . 392+452 )−1297
3 x 4 x3=822 .97
SSA=1rb
∑ y2. j .− y
2. . .
rab= 13x 4
(4282+4622+ 4072 )−12973 x 4 x3
=128 .39
SSB=1ra
∑ y2. .k− y
2. . .
rab= 13 x 3
(2182+3112+ 3412+3642)−12973 x 4 x 3
=434 .08
SSBlocks=1ab
∑ y2 i. .−y2. . .
rab= 13 x 4
(4172+4232+ 4572)−12973 x 4 x 3
=77 .56
SSError(mainp plot=1b∑
r
∑a
y2ij .− y
2. . .
rab−SSblocks−SS A
=14
(1382+1552+ . . .+1502)−12973 x 4 x 3
−128 .39−77 .56=36 .28
SSAB=1r∑
a
∑b
y2. jk− y
2. . .
rab−SSB−SS A
=13
(892+1002+ . . .+1262+1212 )−12973 x 4 x 3
−434 .08−128 .39=75 .17
SSblock x B=1a∑
a
∑b
y2. jk− y
2. . .
rab−SSB−SSblock
=13
(932+902+ . . .+1212+1292)−12973 x 4 x 3
−434 .08−77 .56=20 .67
SSE (subplot )=SStotal−(sum of all other SS )=50 .83
6.3 The Split Split plot DesignThe concept of split-plot designs can be extended to situations in which
randomization restrictions may occur at any number of levels within the
experiment. If there are two levels of randomization restriction, the layout is
called a split-split-plot design. In other words, what we have split once, we
can split again or split the split-plot is called split-split-plot design.