Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency...

DISTRICT WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT UNIT, VADODARA

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

Commissionerate of Rural Development Government of Gujarat

District Watershed Development Unit| Vadodara

JETPURPAVI 1G DETAILED PROJECT REPORT IWMP ‐ 1


CHAPTER ‐1 PROJECT BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Project Background ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Table no.1: Basic project information ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Table no. 2: Weightage of the project ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Table no.3: Watershed information ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ................................................................................................................................ 12 Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ....................................................................................................................................... 12 CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1. Project Implementing Agency ............................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Table no. 6: PIA: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 CHAPTER – 3 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Geography and Geo‐hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Soil and topography: .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: .................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 Table no.12: Climatic conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 20 Table no. 13: Physiography and relief .................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Land and Agriculture: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 21 Table no. 14: Land ownership details..................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Table no. 15: Agriculture ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21 Table no. 16: Irrigation ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Table no. 17: Crop details: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Livestock: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Table no. 18: Livestock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Table no. 19 : Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources: ......................................................................................................................................................... 25 Socio‐Economic Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29


Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................................................................ 30 Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Migration Pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Table no. 23: Migration details .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Table no. 24: Poverty ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Infrastructure facilities: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 32 Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Livelihood pattern: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Table no. 27: Per capita Income ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 Dependence on Common Property Resource ........................................................................................................................................................................ 34 Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .............................................................................................................................................................................. 34 Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ................................................................................................................................................ 35 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: .............................................................. 36 CHAPTER – 4 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 39 Watershed Activities ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 Scientific Planning: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................. 44 Institution building: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 45 Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ......................................................................................................................................................................... 46 ii )Self Help Group .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 Table no. 32: SHG details........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 53 User Group: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 55 Table no. 33: UG detail ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ............................................................................................................................. 57 Watershed Development Works: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs) ......................................................................................................... 60 Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ................................................................ 61 Table no 36.1 Technical Details of Earthen Bund: ................................................................................................................................................................ 64 Table no. 36.2 Technical Details of Farm Pond .................................................................................................................................................................... 64 Table no . 36. 3 Technical Details of Feild/Farm Bund ........................................................................................................................................................... 65


Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ........................................................................................... 65 Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target ................................................................................. 66 Table no 39.2 Agriculture and Aforestation related activites of watershed works phase – Proposed Target ...................................................................... 67 Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ................................................................................................................................... 67 Table no 40.1. Details of activies proposed and their Survey no/ Reference/ GPS co‐ordiantes ......................................................................................... 71 Table no 40.2.Techincal Specification Graded Bunding ......................................................................................................................................................... 73 Table no 40.3.Techincal Specification Farm Bund ................................................................................................................................................................ 73 Table 40.4.Techincal specification Masonary Checkwall ....................................................................................................................................................... 74 Table no 40.5.Techincal Specification Masonary Checkdam ................................................................................................................................................. 76 Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ................................................................................................... 78 Table no .41.1 Technical Details of Aforestation Activities/Plantation/Grass seeding: ........................................................................................................ 81 Table No. 41.1.1 Cost Estimation For Afforestation Activity (For 1000 Plants) ..................................................................................................................... 82 Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ...................................................................................................................................................................... 82 Production System –I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 88 Production System‐II .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 91 Production System‐III: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 93 Production System – V ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98 Production System: VI ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 99 Production System VII : ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 100 4.4. Capacity Building: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 102 Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ......................................................................................................................................................................... 103 Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ................................................................................................................................................................................... 103 Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: ................................................................................................................................. 103 CHAPTER – 5 BUDGETING ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 104 Budgeting ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 105 Table no. 47: Budget at a glance .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 105 Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP ................................................................................................................................ 105 Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ........................................................................................................................................................... 106 Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ................................................................................................................................... 106 CHAPTER ‐ 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES .......................................................................................................................................................................... 109 Expected Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 110 Employment ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110


Table no. 52: Employment in Project area ........................................................................................................................................................................... 110 Migration .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 110 Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ............................................................................................................................................ 111 Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ............................................................................................. 111 Drinking water ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 112 Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water ................................................................................................................................................................................. 113 Crops ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 113 Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area .......................................................................................................................................... 113 Horticulture .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116 Table no. 57: Area under horticulture.................................................................................................................................................................................. 116 Vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 117 Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................ 117 Livestock ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 117 Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ............ 117 Table no. 60: Backward‐Forward linkages ........................................................................................................................................................................... 118 CHAPTER ‐7 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 123 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 123 Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP‐1 ................................................................................................................... 124 ACTION PLAN MAPS ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 127


CHAPTER ‐1 PROJECT BACKGROUND


Project Background Jetpurpavi villages of (IWMP‐1) are located in jetpurpavi Taluka (21°45'0"N 70°36'35"E,) Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐1 consist of 10 villages and a area around 4353.8 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. 10 villages fall under 7 gram panchayats. All the villages are separated by a distance of 30‐35 kms from jetpurpavi taluka. 7 Watershed committees are constituted for these 10 villages and since Bandi, Delga, and Nani amrol fall under the gram panchayat of Bhindol and Bordha respectively separate sub‐watershed committee are formulated at village level. This project is expected to cover 8 micro watershed with codes 5D1B7d2c, 5D1B5d2d, 5D1B5d2b, 5D1B7d2e, 5D1B5d2c, 5D1B7b2g, 5D1B5d2a, 5D1B7d2d, The total project area proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) of the watershed is taken by excluding area covered in Haryali project. The nearest town is Bodeli which is approximately about 25 Km from almost all the villages further taluka place jetpurpavi itself which is about 30 kms and both the towns are well connected by pucca tar road by local transportation facilities. The project area fall in the footstool of hilly mountains with rocky strata with dense to moderate vegetation and this area is a fine example of arid land. The project fall among the 27 micro watersheds. Nayaka, Rathwa, Bariya and koli communities are the major inhabitants of the project area. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, wage labour, depends on local based natural resources, sheep and goat rearing is also prevalent however not in a large scale. The watershed falls under the government designated tribal area. The water level is almost 150 feet deep further, structure of the soil is very shallow with undulated topography with the hilly surrounding. Considerably a slope of more than 25‐30 can be seen. Presence of shiny rocks in the soil is one of the prominent features in some of the villages in this project.


Table no.1: Basic project information Sl No.

Name of the project

Villages Gram Panchayats

Taluka District Area of the

project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project cost(Rs. in

lakh)

PIA

Name Census code

1

IWMP‐1

Ambazati 190040138580000 Ambazati

Jetpurpavi Vadodara

278.20 178.2 ha 21.384

DCF Forest Department

2 Bhindol 190040138560000Bhindol

626.20 374.2 ha 44.904

3 Bandi 190040138420000 520.70 492.7 ha 59.124

4 Bordha 190040138370000

Bortha

1594.30 194.3 ha 23.316

5 Degla 190040138380000 1405.10 984.1 ha 118.092

6 Nani Amrol

190040138410000 500.00 304 ha 36.48

7 Karsan 190040138540000 Karasn 748.90 538.9 ha 64.668

8 Rajpur 190040138550000 Rajpur 575.00 421 ha 50.52

9 Saloj 190040138660000 Saloj 385.50 385.5 ha 46.26

10 Zab 190040138590000 Zab 480.90 480.9 ha 57.708

Total 7114.8 4353.8 522.456


1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Jetpurpavi (IWMP‐I) Watershed project as given in table no. 2. The total number of families under BPL is 1278 , which is equal to 33 per cent of the total households of the project. Hence a score of 5 is allotted. The percentage of schedule tribe in the project is 90% percent to the total population; hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rainfed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village majority of the persons. More than 80 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the average land holdings of farmers in around 2 ha and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages hence a composite rank of 10, 10 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since the waste land is maximum in the project area and due to the low moisture index the area is classified under IWDP block. Drinking water is a major problem in this project area. In a broader view the soil of this region is suitable for agriculture crops and cash crops but due to lack of water harvesting structures and irrigation water agriculture itself has become a constraint and the productivity potential has considerable gone low. The soil is very porous and hence rate of infiltration is more however production of the land can be significantly enriched with the help of better management practices and availability of timely irrigation and use of organic and inorganic fertilizer. Jetpurpavi watershed falls under second priority and it is an individual cluster. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration 8 micro‐watersheds covering a total area of 4353.8 Ha. All the parameters taken together and a cumulative score of 83 is given to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below). Table no. 2: Weightage of the project Project name

Project type Weightage

IWMP 1 Arid Land i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x Xi xii Xiii5 10 5 5 3 0 10 5 10 10 10 10 NA


Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed S. No.

Criteria Maximum score

Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 15 ‐66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block‐33.3 to ‐66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to ‐33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

vii Area under rain‐fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 % (Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low‐ less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

15 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the microwatersheds in the project (0)


xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro‐watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro‐watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Table no.3: Watershed information Name of the project No. of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

IWMP 1 –Jepurpavi 8 5D1B5d2a,5D1B5d2b, 5D1B5d2c,5D1B5d2d, 5D1B7d2c, 5D1B7d2d,5D1B7d2e, 5D1B7d2g,

Micro Watershed

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the jetpurpavi‐1G village This village is very back ward in various issues and falls under tribal area, still some of the villages fails to draw the limelight of schemes and developmental projects. Although NREGS (National Rural Employment Scheme) and Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Sardar Awas Yojana, SGSY, Sakhi Mandal . i. NREGS: Construction of Wells, kutcha Road constructions works, pond depending, check walls, bori bunds and other labour intensive activity

has been taken‐up under NREGA. Construction of boundary trenching, boundary walls, nursery and terrace ponds on hill tops is also taken up through forest department.

ii. Indira Awas Yojana: Total houses constructed in this project are 286 and all the villages of this project have Indra Awas Yojana except for on village Bhindol.

iii. Sardar Awas : 134 houses were built under this shemes and work is still in progess in some of the villages. iv. SGSY: Total groups under this scheme are 256 and are currently active and some of the groups are under grading process. v. Sakhi Mandal: Sakhi Mandal schemes comprise of several groups which are sustainable from long time. vi. SHG of Hariyali: SHG’s of haryali also successfully running in this project area, certain villages are partly taken for treatment through watershed

scheme. vii. Hariyali: Integrated Watershed Development Programme was already running in jetpurpavi taluka and hence several structures were made

through this programme.


Table no. 4: Developmental programmes running in the project area:

S no

Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of

commencement Villages covered

Estimated number of beneficiaries

1 NREGS Rural Development Dept. Employment 2009 10 91 household 2 IAY Rural Development Dept. Housing 2005 9 299 household 3 SGSY Rural Developmnet Dept. Women Welfare 2005 10 143 4 Sakhi Mandal Rural Development Dept. Women Welfare 2006 10 38 Groups 5 SHG’s of Haryali Rural Development Dept. Women and Men Welfare 2003 10 35 Groups6 Sadar Awas Yojana Rural Development Dept. Housing 2003 10 60 FamilyTable no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area

S. No

Project

name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro watershed

Watershed codes

Area under

treatment

Funding

source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost in lakhs

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

in lakhs

% financial completio

n

% physical completio

n

1 IWDP 2003 Ambazati 1 5D1B7d2c 100 Govt DRDA TDO 6 2.7 85% 80% 2 IWDP 2003 Bhindol

1 5D1B5d2b252 Govt DRDA TDO 15.12 11.13 75% 70%

3 IWDP 2003 Zab ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐4 IWDP 2003 Bandi 1 5D1B5d2d 26.7 ha Govt DRDA TDO 1.5 . 40 25% 30%5 IWDP 2003 Bordha 1 5D1B7d2e 1400 ha Govt DRDA TDO 84 54.60 70% 70%6 IWDP 2003 Rajpur (karali)

1 5D1B7d2a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

7 IWDP 2003 Karsan 210 ha Govt DRDA TDO 12.60 5.60 50% 60%8 IWDP 2003 Nani Amrol 1 5D1B7d2d 196 ha Govt DRDA TDO 11.76 8.23 70% 65%9 IWDP 2003 Saloj 1 5D1B5d2c ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 IWDP 2003 Degla 1 5D1B7b2g 421 Govt DRDA TDO 25.26 10.50 65% 55%


CHAPTER – 2 PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY


2.1. Project Implementing Agency The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. In district Vadodara Forest Department is being selected as the Project Implementing Agency. The main office of PIA is located in Chottaudepur taluka place. Deputy conservator of Forest is bestowed the responsibity for all the projects, henceforth he is the PIA of all projects . There are 7 projects in different taluka of Vadodara and each project is assigned to a Nodal officer (Range forest officer). Four different offices are setup in 4 different talukas for smooth functioning and overseasing of project work. About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara The organization and its objectives: The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Vadodara is a district level nodal agency and was established on 12 May 2009 in a separate office to oversee the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a Technical expert and a multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Vadodara are supervising, planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. Programmes/projects of DWDU, Vadodara: At present 7 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Vadodara district. The entry point activities of all the seven IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Vadodara Forest Division is PIA for 7 projects (IWMP‐1, 2, 3, 4,5, 6 & 7). Apart from the 7 IWMP projects, DWDU Vadodara is involved in a total of 303 pre‐Hariyali & Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); 93 projects are completed and 210 projects are still running in the district and are expected to complete within two years of time. The DWDU, Vadodara is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district. SWOT Analysis of the DWDU: Strength: (1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a multidisciplinary team. (2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency. (3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and training institutes for capacity building and technical guidance. (4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar, (5) District level advisory committee for monitoring, coordination & Co‐operation. (6) Prior acquaintance of nodal officers with the villagers of selected project area, hence ease in implementation of project.


Weakness: (1) No permanent office building at project level. (2) Most of the project area is hilly and distance of project area from DWDU is almost 2‐3 hours. (3) Project area inhabitants mainly composed of schedule tribe class hence, ignorance about developmental projects. Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programmes. (2) Better financial provision under IWMP better quality of work can be expected (3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS and MIS integration of the project with the State Level Data Cell for online monitoring and evaluation. (4) Reputed training centres for capacity building at all level of stakeholders viz, , district, block and village level to ensure the proper implementation of the project Threats:

(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact. (2) Options in production system are limited due to the lack of sufficient natural resources and due to limited resource base. (3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning. (4) Lack of awareness of the watershed programme and its objectives. (5) Low literacy rate in the project area.

Table no. 6: PIA: Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP‐1

Jetpurpavi‐1G Project

(i) Type of organization Project Implementing Agency (ii) Name of organization PIA, Chottaudepur (iii) Designation & Address Nodal Officer, Range Forest Office, Jetpurpavi (iv) Telephone 02664‐242234(v) Fax 02664‐242603, 123(vi) E‐mail [email protected]


Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:

S. no

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration (Rs)

1 Mr. Padiyar 51 M Range Forest Officer G.F.S 20 Years Nodal officer ‐ 2 Nitin Pratik Patel 24 M WDT (Engineer) PGDCE Nil Engineer works 8000 3 Ganeshbhai 28 M WDT(Agriculture) BRS(Agri) 6 Years Agriculture Development 8000.00 4 Tadvi Snehal 26 F WDT(Community Mob.) BRS (CM) 3 Years Community Mobilization 8000.00 5 Rathwa Gaurangkumar Jagunbhai 25 M WDT (Data Entry Operator) PGDCA 2 Years Data Entry 5000.00 6 Bhaskarbhai Ramanbhai Prajapati 26 M WDT(Accountant) M.Com ‐ Accounts 7000 7 Bharatkumar Zaverbhai Patel 34 M WDT( Surveyor) Dip. in surveying 20 Years Surveying 6000


CHAPTER – 3 BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA


Geography and Geo‐hydrology Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Jetpurpavi watershed is about 4353.8 ha out of which 40% is forest area. The forest area is nearly covers half of the village land. Forest areas in this region are dense to moderate. Most of the villages in this area are surrounded by hilly and rocky mountains. About 50% of land is under agriculture which is completely rain‐fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 10% of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 50 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The watershed consist mostly consist of Mahuda trees, chalori (Buchanania lanzan), custard apple, bamboo, acacia Arabica, ficus and plam tress. These trees are encouraged and grown by the villager since they generated income for the villagers from the produce obtained through these trees. Table no. 8: Land use pattern:

S. No. Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village (ha)

Forest Area (ha)

Land under agricultural use

(ha)

Rain‐fed area (ha)

Permanent pastures (ha)

Wasteland Cultivable

(ha)Non‐cultivable

(ha)1 Ambazati 278.20 0.00 241.9 219.9 34.3 34.3 2.0 2 Bhindol 520.70 34.20 499.2 432.7 26.5 26.5 66.1 3 Bandi 626.20 357.37 120.0 80.0 14.4 14.4 ‐ 4 Bordha 1594.30 897.36 635.1 606.7 86.4 86.4 581.6 5 Degla 1405.10 1264.84 120.3 120.3 40.5 40.5 351.7 6 Nani Amrol 748.90 110.20 343.9 333.9 61.4 61.4 94.8 7 Karsan 500.00 139.70 489.0 255.9 120.2 120.2 ‐ 8 Rajpur 575.00 58.06 431.9 201.9 24.0 24.0 61.0 9 Saloj 385.50 0.00 343.1 298.9 31.8 31.8 1.7 10 Zab 480.90 0.00 338.8 324.8 5.6 5.6 18.9 7114.8 2861.73 3563.2 2875 445.1 445.1 81.6

Soil and topography: Jetpurpavi watershed project falls under Middle Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam to loamy. The soil is reddish brown to greyish black and deep black in soils in some areas. The depth of soil is shallow to moderate about 25 to 110 cm. The predominant texture of soil is silty clay and moderately coarse texture to fine texture in some villages. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. Status of organic carbon is very poor and depleting in this region due to lack of sufficient organic resources and also largely due to the ignorance of the farmers. Due to the low moisture index of this region organic fertilizer efficiency is not noteworthy. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0‐30% slope with undulating topography and hills surround the most of the project area.


Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:

S. No. Name of the Agro‐climatic zone

covers project area Area in ha

Names of the Project

Major soil typesTopography

a)Type b) Area in ha

1 Middle Gujarat Agro climatic zone

4353.8 ha Jetpurpavi Sandy Loam Black soils with rocky

strata 4353.8 Flat to steep slope

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: S.No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Jetpurpavi Nil Once in 3 Years

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off

(mm/ year) Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/

year) Water erosion

a Sheet 2612.2 124 60% b Rill 870.7 320 20% c Gully 653.7 240 15%

Sub‐Total 4353.8 Wind erosion 4353.8 NA 25%

Total Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress) Ambazati 150/2, 243 7.9 InherentBhindol 123/1, 135 7.4 Inherent Bandi 67/1, 98 7.4 InherentBordha 43, 157 7.8 Inherent Degla 89, 102 7.5 Inherent

Nani Amrol 143, 67/1 7.5 Inherent Karsan 256/1, 141 7.4 Inherent


Rajpur 134/2, 156 7.4 Inherent Saloj 132/166 7.9 Inherent Zab 133/12 7.8 Inherent

Table no.12: Climatic conditions

Sl. No. Year Rainfall (in mm) Temperature (˚C) Highest intensity of Rainfall (mm

in a day) Max. Min. 1 2004 1377 42.1 10.1 243 2 2005 1068 42.1 9.8 301 3 2006 1752 42.3 7.9 320 4 2007 1232 42.9 7.0 268 5 2008 978 43.3 10.0 247 6 2009 548 45.7 11.6 98The project area has a optimum to good rainfall over the years however due to various reasons like, changing weather parameters and global

climate the details of the rainfall from 2004‐2009 has considerably decreased with increasing rate. Hence rainfall sanctity is growing problem in this area and also due to the low water holding capacity, high infiltration, less land scrub, degrading forests, lack of moisture conservation structure and undulated topography leads to drainage of water. The top fertile soils accounts for major loss. The average rainfall of this area is about 1159 mm (from


past six year data) with a highest intensity of 320 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution of rainfall is leading to surface runoff of soil causing ravine and gully erosion as per the details given in table no 11. The rainfall of this area has considerable gone down from the past two consecutive years and there is decresing trend in rainfall with increasing trend in temperature from past 6 years data. Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation(MSL) Slope range (%) Major streamsJetpurpavi (82.7) Meters 25‐33 % NA

Land and Agriculture: Surface water sources and limited ground water table makes farming a difficult task and scarcity of drinking water in this area is among the major problems in almost all the villages of jetpurpavi IWMP‐1 project area. The average land holding is about 1.0 ha ranging from 1 to 5 ha. Crop failure is common problem due to insufficient and untimely rains hence, agriculture become a risky. Only kharif season crop is taken in this area. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Maize, cotton, paddy and pulses like Redgram and black gram in this area. 95% of the total agriculture is rainfed and is based on monsoon of that respective year. In Rabi season only 5% of the land is under cultivation in places where the irrigation sources is available. Modern agriculture practise are prevalent in these areas, use of fertilizers and agricultural pesticides for better crop production for increased yields. Table no. 14: Land ownership details

S No Villages Total owned land (in ha)

Gen OBC SC ST 1 Ambazati NA ‐ 10 241.9 2 Bhindol NA ‐ ‐ 499.2 3 Bandi NA ‐ 12 120.0 4 Bordha NA ‐ ‐ 635.1 5 Degla NA ‐ ‐ 120.36 Nani Amrol NA ‐ ‐ 343.97 Karsan NA ‐ 19‐ 489.08 Rajpur NA ‐ ‐ 431.99 Saloj NA ‐ 16 343.110 Zab NA ‐ ‐ 338.8 Total 37 3563.2

Table no. 15: Agriculture S.No Village Net sown area(ha) (ha) One time (Kharif) Two times (Rabi) Three times


1 Ambazati 235.6 89.5 NA 2 Bhindol 577 51 NA 3 Bandi 128 21 NA 4 Bordha 664.5 68.2 NA5 Degla 245.2 35.1 NA6 Nani Amrol 343 41 NA7 Karsan 372. 12 NA8 Rajpur 410 9 NA9 Saloj 495.3 16 NA 10 Zab 298.3 19 NA

Table no. 16: Irrigation

S No Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area Gross area Availability months

Net area Ha

Gross area Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Ambazati NA ‐ ‐ 2 4 278.20 5 5 278.202 Bhindol NA ‐ ‐ 3 3 520.70 8 6 520.70 3 Bandi NA ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 626.20 7 4 626.204 Bordha NA ‐ ‐ 3 15 1594.30 7 5 1594.30 5 Degla NA ‐ ‐ 2 6 1405.10 6 6 1405.106 Nani Amrol NA ‐ ‐ 4 2 748.90 6 5 748.90 7 Karsan NA ‐ ‐ 3 3 500.00 8 6 500.00 8 Rajpur NA ‐ ‐ 3 2 575.00 8 5 575.00 9 Saloj NA ‐ ‐ 3 2 385.50 8 6 385.50 10 Zab NA ‐ ‐ 2 2 480.90 7 6 480.90

Table no. 17: Crop details:

Sl no Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 1 Maize Crop 2 Tur Crop 3 Cotton Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Ambazati 56.6 55945 999 36 10170 999 31 12550 404.82 Bhindol 74 96590 1305.2 37.72 17046 451.9 98.2 51980 529.323 Bandi 83.2 53800 646 72 15075 209.37 ‐ ‐ 0


4 Bordha 129.5 104780 809 78.68 28920 367.5 77.6 57380 739.4 5 Degla 48.48 24630 508.04 17.2 16430 955.2 2.8 1800 624.2 6 Nani Amrol 35.32 38710 1095 3.8 2400 631 16.8 24890 1481 7 Karsan 81.2 50800 625 ‐ 0 0 80.26 84040 10478 Rajpur 148 82975 560 10.72 5165 481 26.36 17240 654.29 Saloj 17.28 8570 493 30.56 20545 681.2 56.04 58980 105210 Zab 40.1 22175.3 553 25.1 11325 451.1 15.04 7339.52 453 7593.24 5227.27 6984.92

Sl no Village Kharif (Monsoon)

Crop 4 Black Gram Crop 5 Paddy Crop 6Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Ambazati ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 Bhindol ‐ ‐ ‐ 41.2 11830 287 ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 Bandi ‐ ‐ ‐ 52.64 18745 356 ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 Bordha ‐ ‐ ‐ 8.2 5300 646 ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 Degla ‐ ‐ ‐ 15.2 8340 548.6 ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 Nani Amrol ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 Karsan ‐ ‐ ‐ 57.18 14770 258 ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 Rajpur ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 Saloj ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 Zab ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Sl no

Village Rabi (Winter)

Crop 1 Maize Crop 2 Cotton Crop 3 TurArea Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity

1 Ambazati 50 1670 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐2 Bhindol ‐ ‐ 11 1130 ‐ ‐3 Bandi ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐4 Bordha 24 1650 10 950 ‐ ‐ ‐‐ 5 Degla 14 1558 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 Nani Amrol 4.5 1678 _ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 Karsan ‐ ‐ ‐ 80 1060 ‐ ‐ ‐


8 Rajpur ‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 Saloj ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 Zab ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Livestock: The villages has 2230 cows, 2360 buffaloes, 2408 bullocks, 2476 goats and no sheeps. Livestock is owned by all almost all the farmer for drought and agriculture purposes. Partly some people in the community depend on goat rearing for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. Mehsani buffalo and Gir cow are common in this area and the survival and production parameters are suitable to this region and climatic condition. Hence there is wider scope for improvement of dairy in this cluster of villages of jetpurpavi IWMP‐1. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. Milk production is very low however this can be improved by fodder production in the wasteland in these areas. Although green fodder is only available in kharif season, excess fodder can be dried and stored for use in off season. Table no. 18: Livestock Sl no

Village Buffalo(Lit/annum) Cow(Lit/annum) Total Milk

(Buffalo+Cow) Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk (Lit/annum) No Milk Camel 1 Ambazati 120 69120 65 20475 89595 127 9525 ‐ 142 176 ‐ 2 Bhindol 319 183744 145 45675 229419 113 8475 ‐ 187 134 ‐ 3 Bandi 91 52416 105 33075 85491 182 13650 ‐ 431 176 ‐ 4 Bordha 141 81216 510 160650 241866 446 33450 ‐ 450 180 ‐ 5 Degla 90 51840 205 64575 116415 285 21375 ‐ 127 50 ‐ 6 Nani Amrol 172 99072 255 80325 179397 356 26700 ‐ 80 290 ‐ 7 Karsan 595 342720 275 86625 429345 304 22800 ‐ 223 156 ‐8 Rajpur 301 173376 260 81900 255276 143 10725 ‐ 220 165 ‐9 Saloj 355 204480 155 48825 253305 81 6075 ‐ 206 232 ‐10 Zab 176 101376 255 80325 181701 439 32925 ‐ 342 147 ‐ 2360 2230 2476 2408 1706

Table no. 19 : Drinking water Sl no Village Ground water table (m) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality1 Ambazati 20 Well 8 Months Good 2 Bhindol 25 Well 8 Months Good 3 Bandi 20 Well 8 Months Good 4 Bordha 30 Well 8 Months Good


5 Degla 30 Well 8 Months Good 6 Nani Amrol 20 Well 8 Months Good 7 Karsan 20 Well 8 Months Good 8 Rajpur 20 Well 8 Months Good9 Saloj 15 Well 8 Months Good10 Zab 20 Well 8 Months Good

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources:

S. No.

Names of project

Village CPR

Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify)

1

IWMP‐ 1

Ambazati

Waste/Degraded land

0.0202 7.3709 0.0202 1.5000

Pastures 8.0884 2.0884 Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 0.00 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship

Others (Pl. specify)

2 Bhindol

Waste/ degraded land

3.0260 42.2695 17.0657 1.0260 4.2000 4.0657

Pastures 18.8662 4.8662 Orchards


Village Woodlot Forest 34.2467 34.2467 Village Ponds/ Tanks 34.20 Community Buildings 1.3153 Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


3 Bandi


1.1937 1.1937

Pastures 1.8817 1.8817 Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 352.5037 352.5037 Village Ponds/ Tanks 0.3440 0.3440 Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


4 Bordha


28.3804 20.7457 2.5000 10.7000

Pastures 7.2633 7.2633Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 861.6859 861.6859 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets


Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


5 Degla

Waste/degraded land

2.8575 24.6728 2.8575 4.5

Pastures 1.9112 1.9112Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 1264.84 12.96Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings 0.4047 0.4047 Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


6 IWMP‐ 1 Nani Amrol

Wastel/ degraded land

.4000 28.9500 .4000 2.9500

Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 110.20 .6928Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets

Temples/ Places of worship



7 Karsan


20.2225 29.2225 20.2225 29.2225

Pastures 22.8136 22.8136Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 139.6982 139.6982 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings .09096 .09096 Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


8 Rajpur(K)


28.2269 50.5716 28.2269 41.5716

Pastures 16.38 16.38Orchards Village Woodlot Forest Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings 1.9931 1.9931 Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


9 Saloj


4.2422 9.8153 4.2422 9.8153

Pastures 6.2072 6.2072Orchards Village Woodlot


Forest 00.0 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship


10 Zab (S)

Waste/degraded land

0.0300 79.8300 72.1500 0.0300 79.8300 72.1500

Pastures 3.1600 3.1600Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 0.00 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship

Others (Pl. specify) Socio‐Economic Profile Demographic Status:

Jetpurpavi watershed project has a total of 2318 households with a population of 10596 (as per base‐line survey) out of which 5518 are male and 5045 female .The sex ratio is 914 female to 1000 male. There are 723 BPL families. The average family size is 5.5 . The literacy rate is very low i.e. 25.7 per cent; male literacy rate is 59.3 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is 40.6 per cent (of total female population). People in this area are more inclined towards education as it is the best option and opportunities other sectors are also less. The major castes in the village are rathwa, bariya, nayaka and all are Schedule tribe. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. Young children go to anganwadi schools and better follow‐up is done by the teachers of aganwadi for the drop out and encouraged to join the school.


Table no. 21: Demographic information Sl no

Village Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %1 Ambazati 674 360 314 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 674 360 314 100 2 Bhindol 1156 598 558 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1156 598 558 100 3 Bandi 613 317 297 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 613 317 297 100 4 Bordha 1393 749 644 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1393 749 644 100 5 Degla 460 232 228 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 460 232 228 100 6 Nani Amrol 616 331 285 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 616 331 285 100 7 Karsan 1991 1032 959 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1991 1032 959 100 8 Rajpur 1174 591 542 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1174 591 542 100 9 Saloj 1309 691 618 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1309 691 618 100 10 Zab 1210 617 600 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1210 617 600 100 10596 5518 5045

Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sl no Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %1 Ambazati 198 29.37 123 62.1 75 37.9 2 Bhindol 124 10 70 56.4 54 43.63 Bandi 143 30.3 102 71.3 41 28.7 4 Bordha 186 13.3 63 33.8 123 66.2 5 Degla 45 9.7 20 44.4 25 55.6 6 Nani Amrol 182 29.5 126 69.2 56 30.8 7 Karsan 768 38.5 464 59.0 304 41.0 8 Rajpur 312 26.2 223 71.4 89 28.6 9 Saloj 603 46.0 351 58.2 252 41.8 10 Zab 293 24.2 199 67.9 94 32.1

Total 257.07 593.7 406.3


Migration Pattern: People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat, Ahmedabad , Vadodara, bhuj, Ankelshwar and Suarashtra as daily wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. As soon as kharif season ends most of people tend to migrated to different places in search of employment. People with little irrigation souces and livestock stay in the village, futher during drought season 80% of the villagers choose to migrate which leaves these villages almost empty. Regularly they migrate to same places and work as agriculture labour and wage labour. One more reason behind migration is , the income is almost 50 thousand to 1 lakh during that period. Table no. 23: Migration details

Sl no Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason for migration

Income during migration / month

Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3‐6 months

More than 6 months

1 Ambazati 674 168 102 67 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 60002 Bhindol 1156 346 188 158 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 60003 Bandi 613 122 71 51 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 5500 4 Bordha 1393 390 238 152 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 6500 5 Degla 460 96 52 44 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 6000 6 Nani Amrol 616 166 99 67 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 7000 7 Karsan 1991 477 248 229 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 6000 8 Rajpur(k) 1174 328 183 145 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 5000 9 Saloj 1309 287 152 135 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 8000 10 Zab(S) 1210 302 173 129 ‐ ‐ 6 Months Employment 6000

Table no. 24: Poverty

S no Village Total Household BPL

% of BPL HH Total Land less HH % of land less HH 0‐16 17‐20 Total

1 Ambazati 145 27 22 49 33.7 16 11.12 Bhindol 261 13 43 56 21.4 41 15.7 3 Bandi 114 52 50 102 89.4 23 20.14 Bordha 340 107 120 227 66.7 17 55 Degla 117 115 12 117 100 9 7.66 Nani Amrol 214 42 55 97 45.3 33 15.4 7 Karsan 423 227 42 269 63.5 15 3.5 8 Rajpur(k) 229 65 14 79 34.4 44 19.2


9 Saloj 279 59 74 133 47.6 49 17.56 10 Zab(S) 270 78 116 194 71.8 20 7.4 Total 2392 729 549 1278 267

Infrastructure facilities: Almost all the villages has electricity connectivity under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 70 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters and pay their bills regularly. Most of the villages in this cluster have primary schools. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to go to Bodeli a market place and a mini town which is about 20‐25 kilometres away on an average from the almost all the villages this particular cluster. However, most of the youngster travel this distance on daily basis to obtain a better education facilities. Most of these do not have any primary health care centre for which villagers have to go to bodeli or jetpurpavi taluka place which is 20 and 25 Kms respectively. Some of the villages come under a Group Panchayat with Panchayat as mentioned in Table no 1 of basic project information. Table no. 25: Village infrastructure S no

Village Pucca road to the village (Y/N)

Schools Colleges (Number)

Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from nearest market yard

Milk collection centre (Number)

Milk cooperative (Number)

Other cooperatives / CBIs (Number)

Any other institution

LP UP HS

1 Ambazati No Yes NA NA NA 25 ‐ 7 km Yes 1 Yes GP,

Deepak Foundation

2 Bhindol Yes Yes NA NA NA 20 ‐ 5 km Yes 1 Yes GP,3 Bandi No Yes NA NA NA 23 ‐ 8 Km NA ‐ Yes4 Bordha No Yes NA NA NA 35 ‐ 15 Km NA ‐ Yes 5 Degla No Yes NA NA NA 40 ‐ 25 Km NA ‐ Yes 6 Nani Amrol Yes Yes NA NA NA 25 ‐ 9 Km NA ‐ Yes 7 Karsan Yes Yes NA NA NA 25 ‐ 7 Km Yes 1 Yes JBIC 8 Rajpur No Yes NA NA NA 24 ‐ 8 Km Yes 1 Yes 9 Saloj Yes Yes NA NA NA 22 ‐ 6 Km Yes 1 Yes 10 Zab Yes Yes NA NA NA 23 ‐ 8 Km Yes 1 Yes Wasmo


Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sl no

Village HHs with electricity

HHs with safety latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicleHHs with TV set

HHs with cooking gas

HHs with Drinking water

HHs with fridge

Land line Mobile 2‐wheeler 4‐wheeler

1 Ambazati 111 3 ‐ 50 39 1 17 ‐ 0 5 2 Bhindol 151 11 ‐ 77 27 8 16 ‐ 0 6 3 Bandi 112 2 ‐ 32 10 ‐ 17 ‐ 0 2 4 Bordha 298 3 57 26 4 7 ‐ 0 1 5 Degla 53 17 ‐ 35 3 ‐ 5 ‐ 0 ‐ 6 Nani Amrol 108 3 ‐ 14 21 2 11 ‐ ‐ 4 7 Karsan 156 6 ‐ 19 16 4 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 Rajpur(k) 203 4 ‐ 71 29 4 10 ‐ ‐ 7 9 Saloj 241 11 ‐ 36 52 2 25 ‐ ‐ 410 Zab(S) 164 14 ‐ 51 27 5 11 ‐ ‐ 4

Livelihood pattern: The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in

Surat and surastra and as agriculture labour in other parts of the state. People also earn some income from common property resources. As this area is abundant with local palm trees, in off‐season women tend to sell the extract from these trees locally known as nira a semi alcoholic natural drink consumed by the localities to sustain from the heat waves of summer. This is also one of the subsidiary income sources for the villager especially in summer season. Table no. 27: Per capita Income Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total 1 Ambazati 1677 316 566 22 2581 2 Bhindol 2293 405 901 411 4010 3 Bandi 2044 ‐ 315 ‐ 2359 4 Bordha 3285 495 607 10 4397 5 Degla 1703 227 532 21 2483 6 Nani Amrol 1886 229 ‐ 120 2235 7 Karsan 1811 210 635 84 22408 Rajpur(k) 2945 692 526 ‐ 4163


9 Saloj 1872 343 566 77 2348 10 Zab(S) 1614 456 616 ‐ 2131

Dependence on Common Property Resource The majority of the people of this region depend on Common property resources. Most of them continue to live a virtually hand‐to‐mouth existence. Based upon the rainfall data of past few years the rainfall of this area is increasingly decreasing due to which agriculture is become a major constraint. Availability of little moisture is also insufficient for the development of pasture lands this trend seems to continue year by year making the natural resources depleting at a faster rate. Drinking water is also scarce in this region and most of the well water table is going deeper day by day. One of the prominent features of all these villages in this cluster is dependence on common property resources. Trees of mahuda are abundant in this area and yearly people tend to earn Rs.2500‐3500 per family in summer season. Two main products are mahuda flowers and mahuda seeds. First is Mahuda flowers when fermented releases great amounts of alcohol hence, flowers are sold in the near markets which are exported to different states. Secondly seed cotyledons of mahuda have a good amount of fatty acids which turns into oil after it is allowed from oil extraction process. Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sl no Village Mahuda Flowers Timrupan

Total income (Rs) % sells Income (Rs) % sells Income

1 Ambazati ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 Bhindol 20 15000 20 14500 295003 Bandi 82 52000 60 28000 80000 4 Bordha 80 62000 80 30000 92000 5 Degla 80 60000 20 25000 850006 Nani Amrol 50 4000 40 20000 24000 7 Karsan ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 Rajpur ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 Saloj ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐10 Zab 30 25000 30 25000 50000


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) Sl no

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry (AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour

Services Handicraft Others

1 Ambazati 455 131 44 46 178 31 ‐ 72 Bhindol 791 158 65 34 110 15 ‐ 33 Bandi 423 158 15 12 98 0 ‐ 204 Bordha 811 303 28 36 105 23 ‐ 105 Degla 309 443 13 23 147 ‐ ‐ ‐6 Nani Amrol 410 571 33 32 37 10 ‐ ‐7 Karsan 1336 1921 85 45 700 7 ‐ 108 Rajpur 816 1004 135 39 200 12 ‐ ‐9 Saloj 920 1187 172 48 103 11 ‐ 31 10 Zab 785 223 92 12 27 19 ‐ ‐

This shows the livelihood pattern of these particular villagers about 37% are solely engaged in agriculture activities, 41% agriculture plus animal husbandry, 14% causal cum agri labour, 5 % in animal husbandry exclusively, 2% in services and 1% in handy crafts works. As shown in this figure it can be understood that primary occupation of this cluster is agriculture and followed by casual labour, which is why most of the people migrate to distant parts of Gujarat in search of labour works during off season. Animal husbandry comes next to casual labour, which is not much improved due to lack of fodder and improved breeds hence, based upon the available resources from locally and from common property resources the livelihood activities were planned keeping in view the pro and cons this clusters.


Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World: “The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.” In order to asses the status of agricultural crops of the project area it is very crucial to have data of that particular geography and its agriculture profile to make a comparative analysis. Hence different sources of data like Baseline survey (for Jetpurpavi village), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (Vadodara) on production and productivity are obtained. Based upon the production and productivity data the gap can be understood in comparision with project villages, taluka place, district, state, country and world. The projections on the graphs is relative comparision of productivity of different places this is in order to understand the gaps in the productivity and to find the plausible solution for increasing the potential to an extend possible. Crop Details of Project area: Crop 1: Maize One of the most important feature of this taluka in terms of agriculture is, the productivity of maize is higest in jetpurpavi taluka in comparsion to entire state and stand first in term of productivity. Maize is one of the major cereals crops grown in this project area and taluka place of jetpurpavi. Mazie staple food crop in this region and 10 villages of project area are designated as tribal villages and their majority of people depend upon mazie as food crop. Fig.1 Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Maize and Redgram


The world productivity of Maize is 2024 kg/ha. In India, it is grown in about 6290 lakh hectares with a production of 10303 lakh tonnes and productivity of 2024 kg/ha. Gujarat is one of the lowest producing state in India with a 1481 kg/ha productivity, Vadodara district productivity being 1100. Jetpurpavi block has very good productivity of 3500 kg/ha. The productivity of the project area is less in comparsion to the district. Hence, with proper solution the gaps can be minimized through modern agriculture practises. Crop 2: Redgram: Pigeonpea is grown on an area of about 3.25 million hectares with the production of 2.23 million tonnes in the country.The world productivity of red is 780 kg/ha, India productivity 685 kg/ha. It is second most important crop after chickpea among different pulse crops in the country. Intresting Gujarat state have maximum productivity of with 989 kg/ha and one of the noteworthy facts is jetpurpavi has twice the productivity of redgram and even the project area productivity is higher than the world. However their is a gap between project area and jetpurpavi, this can be minimized by modern agricultural practices. Figure 2 . Comparative data of project, Block, District, State and country of Paddy and Cotton

Figure 2, Compartative Productivity of Paddy and Cotton,Jetpurpavi‐1G:

Crop 3: Paddy In India, rice accounts for 22 per cent of the total cropped area under cereals.The most significant achievement of the post independent era is the transformation from chronic deficit to self‐sufficiency. The per capita net availability of rice (provisional) has increased from about 150 g in 1950 to 225 g in 1990, in spite of growing population.The rice area has shrunk from 2.52 million hectares in 1960 to about 2.20 million hectares in 1998‐99, but the production has increased from 3.5 million tonnes to about 8.2 million tonnes in 1998‐99 and ranked first in national productivity with 2278 kg/ha. World is


kg/ha 3033, Gujarat 1699 kg/ha, district Vadodara 1125 kg/ha, jetpurpavi 1200 kg/ha and project area is 419 kg/ha respectively. We can see the gap in the productivity of project area. This is mainly due to the lack of irrigation facilities and traditional varities. The differenc can be elimated by different innovative techniques of crop demonstration to create awareness of fertilizer use, pesticides and different tillage practices for increasing productivity of paddy. Crop 4: Cotton Cotton often referred as "White gold" has been in cultivation in India for more than five thousand years. He cotton required for the purpose of manufacturing yarn is cultivated in about 9 million hectares of land in India and thus India ranks first in the world. In India, cotton is grown over an area of about 9 million hectares and provides livelihood for over 4 million farming families. The productivity of cotton is very low in India but still it stands first in production of cotton after china and USA. The productivity of cotton is very low in the project area in comparision to the jetpurpavi block. Hence this difference can be improved agricultural practices to an extend. Productivity details of project area of cotton is 698 kg/ha, 950 kg/ha, 534 kg/ha, 774 kg/ha, 488 kg/ha, 690 kg/ha in comparision to taluka, district, state, country and world respectively. The productivity of Project area is low due to following reasons: i) Full dependence on monsoon: Project villages village is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate. ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area: Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time. iii) Traditional farming methods: This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity. iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery: Even today a large number of farmers in jetpurpavi project use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices. v) Lack of finances for farmers: In jetpurpavi most of the farmers are marginal and small. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds, machinery and other inputs. vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers: Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In project, however, there are two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. In jetpurpavi mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land. vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing: 5‐10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.


CHAPTER – 4 WATERSHED ACTIVITIES


Watershed Activities Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain‐fed regions of semi‐arid tropics. These

regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. Scientific Planning:

i) Cluster Approach This envisages a broader vision of Geo‐hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro‐watershed. The Jetpurpavi IWMP‐1

Project consists of eight micro‐ watersheds namely 5D1B5d2a, 5D1B5d2b, 5D1B5d2c, 5D1B5d2d, 5D1B7d2c, 5D1B7d2d, 5D1B7d2e, 5D1B7d2g as their respective codes. Further jetpurpavi IWMP‐1 watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Lunaja, Muthai, Ambakuth, Ghata, Chetapur, Kundal villages which are taken as IWMP‐3 as third priority area this gives an element of continuation of the programme and suits with features of cluster approach as holistic development. ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio‐physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits.


Bio‐physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post‐ withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the farmers.


Focus Group Discussion with women: Community mobilization expert has carried out the FGD with women in order to understand various issues related to their day to day life. PRA tools such as time line, daily activity chart, details of SHG’s, details of common property resources, seasonal health problems, girl child education, problems of agriculture and seasonal charts were discussed. In this discussion women were encouraged to speak about their problem. The women who drew these charts described the differences between the rainy and dry season patterns. In the dry season, it took longer to get water from the well and collecting firewood to stockpile for the rainy season. When the rains come, things are much busier and the women's

days are much longer because of all the work to be done in the fields. Foucus Group Discussion with men


Village level net planning

iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System(GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo‐morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. b) Planning A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. Land parcel number of those particular villages is provided in order to understand the drainage, slope and stream in that area. Selection of site can be marked on the maps with help of survey number of that village map. c) Hydrological modelling Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.


Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was

used

(A) Planning Cluster approach YesWhether technical back‐stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute Baseline survey YesHydro‐geological survey YesContour mapping YesParticipatory Net Planning (PNP) YesRemote sensing data‐especially soil/ crop/ run‐off coverRidge to Valley treatment Online IT connectivity between (1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes (2) DRDA and SLNA Yes (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes2. Village boundaries Yes3. Drainage Yes4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes5. Land use Yes6. Ground water status Yes7. Watershed boundaries Yes 8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models# No Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

No

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# NoWeather Station


(B) Inputs No 1. Bio‐pesticides No 2. Organic manures Yes 3. Vermicompost Yes4. Bio‐fertilizer No5. Water saving devices Yes6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes7. Bio‐fencing Yes8. Nutrient budgeting No 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers NoAny other (please specify)

Institution building: The watershed development project has great potential and scope to empower socially disadvantage sections of the community. Considering the needs and priorities of these sections, special activities can be designed to reduce their drudgery. The can be involved in a skills up gradation programme. People's organizations hold the key in ensuring the right integration between sustainable development and social equity. Such organizations must have representations from socially backward communities and women with separate special interest groups. Within group interactions across group interactions and representation in village level institutions provide a platform for the disadvantaged groups to become a part of mainstream development. It is also important to ensure that these groups obtain equal opportunities to access the resources developed at the community level.

i) Watershed Committee (WC) It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the villages of IWMP‐1 jetpurpavi 1G project area. The IWMP‐1 Jetpurpavi is a cluster of 10 villages with 7 Gram panchayats. Hence 7 main Watershed Committees and 3 sub‐watershed committees are formed at village keeping all parameter of watershed committee keeping the gender sensitive issues intact. Watershed committee member are briefed about the project objectives and a workshop is also conducted in this regard at every village. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.


Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details

Sr. No.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

Name Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land‐Less

UG SHG GP Any other

Educa‐tional qualifi‐cation

Function/s assigned#

1

Ambazati

Under progress

Kolcha Arunbhai Prbhubhai President M Y Y Y A‐B 2 Rathva Saileshbhai Govindbhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y A‐B 3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y A‐B‐D 4 Kolcha Amrutbhai Mangubhai Member M Y Y Y G 5 Kolcha Babubhai Jethabhai Member M Y Y Y I‐H 6 Kolcha Devendrbhai Koyjibhai Member M Y Y Y G‐I 7 Tadvi Naginbhai Balabhai Member M Y Y Y F‐I 8 Rathva Minaxi Ben Atanbhai Member F Y Y Y I‐H 9 Rathva Anita Ben Arunbhai Member F Y Y Y A‐B 10 Kolcha Shankarbhai Ramlabhai Member F Y Y Y E 11 Nayka Santa Ben Mangabhai Member M Y Y D‐E‐I 12 Nayka Chanda Ben Bachlabhai Member M Y Y E‐G 13 Kolcha Navinbhai Jadiyabhai Member M Y Y Y E‐G 14 Rathva Saroj Ben S. (WDT) M Y E‐G‐A‐B

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Bhindol Under progress

Rathva Shankarbhai Kagdabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B2 Kolcha Bharatbhai Naykabhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y A‐B3 Rathva Ishwerbhai Ukedbhai Member M Y Y Y G‐I4 Rathva Prbhubhai Rangabhai Member M Y Y Y E‐H5 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y A‐B‐G‐H 6 Kolcha Pratapbhai Mathurbhai Member M Y Y Y E‐I 7 Kolcha Kalubhai Bhngdabhai Member M Y Y Y A‐H


8 Kolcha Amra Ben Dharmendrabhai Member F Y Y Y E‐I 9 Kolcha Geeta Ben Kablabhai Member F Y Y Y F‐G 10 Nayka Bchi Ben Bhaniyabhai Member F Y Y A‐B 11 Rathva Kapuri Ben Narubhai Member F Y Y A12 Kolcha Mathubhai Kisanbhai Member M Y Y Y Y G13 Rathva Hirabhai Member M Y Y Y I14 Rabari Nagjibhai L. WDT M Y A‐B‐E‐G

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Bandi

Rathva Isverbhai Ukedabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B 2 Nayka Bhadurbhai Maansingbhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y A‐B‐G3 Rathva Nagjibhai Kliyabhai Member M Y Y Y C‐G 4 Rathva Babubhai Dhrsiyabhai Member M Y Y Y I‐H 5 Rathva Ratanbhai Kalchabhai Member M Y Y Y H 6 Rathva Ramila Ben Vikabhai Member F Y Y Y G 7 Rathva Kampaa Ben Isverbhai Member F Y Y Y I 8 Rathva Bavi Ben Bhuliyabhai Member F Y Y Y F 9 Rathva Isverbhai Ramabhai Member M Y Y Y G 10 Rathva Sureshbhai Bhotiyabhai Member M Y Y Y H 11 Ganeshbhai WDT M A‐B‐E‐G

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Bordha

Rathva Navalsing Kagdabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B 2 Rathva Kalubhai Jhalabhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y B‐G 3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y G‐H 4 Rathva Ravjibhai Mangubhai Member M Y Y Y I‐G


5 Rathva Shambhubhai Varjubhai Member M Y Y Y E 6 Rathva Sanabhai Bavabhai Member M Y Y Y D 7 Rathva Surtanbhai Jadvaabhai Member M Y Y Y F 8 Vasava Laksmanbhai Hathiyabhai Member M Y Y Y I9 Rathva Kagdabhai Manglabhai Member M Y Y Y G10 Rathva K. F Member M Y Y E11 Rathva Chekali Ben Sanjaybhai Member F Y Y Y H12 Rathva Sumitra Ben Surtanbhai Member F Y Y Y I‐H13 Rathva Islee Ben Subhasbhai Member F Y Y Y A 14 Nayka Kalubhai Bavabhai Member M Y Y B15 Rathva Kamala Ben Bhursingbhai Member F Y Y Y A 16 Snehal K Tadvi Member F Y Y Y A‐I Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Name Designation M/F

SC

ST SF MF LF Land‐Less

UG SHG GP Any other

Educa‐tional

qualification

Function/s

assigned#

1 Degla

Rathva Kevsingbhai Raisingbhai

President M Y Y Y A‐B

2 Rathva Mangibhai Kalgibhai Wise‐President

M Y Y Y A‐B

3 Rathva Gosalabhai Mohanbhai Member M Y Y Y E 4 Rathva Naranbhai Jaslabhai Member M Y Y Y I5 Nayka Jagubhai Kediyabhai Member M Y Y Y G6 Nayka Sumanbhai Jagabhai Member M Y Y Y F7 Rathva Jagli Ben Naarsingbhai Member F Y Y Y H 8 Rathva Sugi Ben Surtanbhai Member F Y Y Y E 9 Rathva Remali Ben Harsingbhai Member F Y Y Y I 10 Rathva Kavli Ben Govindbhai Member F Y Y Y G 11 Rathva Bhurabhai Manglabhai Member M Y Y Y A 12 Rathva Vechatbhai Kasalabhai Member M Y Y Y A‐B 13 Nayka Kali Ben Govindbhai Member F Y Y Y E


Sr. No.

Names of WCs


Name Designation

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land‐Less

UG SHG GP Any other



1 Nani Amrol

Rathva Amsingbhai Narubhai President M Y Y Y A‐B2 Rathva Mathurbhai Juglabhai Wise‐

President M Y Y Y B

3 Rathva Bhantabhai Blubhai Member M Y Y Y C4 Rathva Damsingbhai

Jedlabhai Member M Y Y Y F

5 Rathva Babubhai Furkanbhai Member M Y Y Y H6 Rathva Chupa Ben Kajanbhai Member F Y Y Y I7 Rathva Sumitra Ben

Bhantabhai Member F Y Y Y G

8 Rathva Savali Ben Kchubhai Member F Y Y Y A9 Rathva Savita Ben

Bhariyabhai Member F Y Y Y B

10 Rathva Iswerbhai Jogibhai Member M Y Y Y E 11 Rathva Guliyabhai

Khaperbhai Member M Y Y Y H

12 Rathva Rameshbhai Bavabhai Member M Y Y Y G 13 Nayka Vagdiyabhai Maliubhai Member M Y Y Y F 14 Nayaka Fulgibhai Ghotiyabhai Member M Y Y Y H

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Karsan

Rathva Kanchanbhai Bhurabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B

2 Kolcha Nileshbhai Purusotambhai

Wise‐President M

Y Y Y A‐B

3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y D


4 Rathva Shankarbhai Chhotabhai Member M Y Y Y E

5 Rathva Bhgabhai Gokalbhai Member M Y Y Y F

6 Rathva Bhanabhai Hadiyabhai Member M Y Y Y G‐H

7 Dhor‐Koli Rushichbhai Govindbhai Member M

Y Y Y I‐E

8 Rathva Hemlata Ben Ramanbhai Member M Y Y Y D‐G 9 Rathva Amila Ben Kanchanbhai Member F Y Y Y A 10 Tadvi Raji Ben Chakabhai Member F Y Y B 11 Dhor‐Koli Damibhai Hariyabhai Member F Y Y Y B

12 Dhor‐Koli Upendrabhai Vechlabhai Member M

Y Y Y F

13 Dhor‐Koli Upinbhai Amraabhai Member F Y Y E 14 Pratik N. Patel Member M Y H

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Rajpur(K)

Rathva Maheshbhai Sankarbhai President M Y Y Y A‐B

2 Rathva Persotambhai Somabhai

Wise‐President M

Y Y Y B

3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y E 4 Rathva Aswinbhai Mansingbhai Member M Y Y Y F 5 Rathva Upendrbhai Kausikbhai Member M Y Y Y H 6 Koli Amarsing Abheysing Member M Y Y Y D 7 Rathva Vipinbhai Kalubhai Member M Y Y Y G 8 Kolcha Vindi Ben Gokalbhai Member F Y Y Y H 9 Nayka Kanta Ben Rasikbhai Member F Y Y Y E10 Kolcha Kankavati Ben Jeslabhai Member F Y Y Y A‐B


11 Koli Usha Ben Kapurbhai Member F Y Y Y B 12 Kolcha Maansing Hadiyabhai Member M Y Y Y D 13 Nayka Vithhalbhai Gablabhai Member M Y Y Y E 14 Pratik N. Patel Engineer M Y A‐I

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Saloj

Kolcha Chandrsing Somabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B2 Kolcha Rameshbhai Vechatbhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y A‐B‐G3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y E4 Kolcha Ramjibhai Jadavabhai Member M Y Y Y D 5 Tadvi Vinodbhai Jesingbhai Member M Y Y Y F 6 Kolcha Vatanbhai Trikambhai Member M Y Y Y H 7 Kolcha Pradipbhai Arvindbhai Member M Y Y Y G 8 Kolcha Rita Ben Prafulbhai Member F Y Y Y E 9 Kolcha Jyotika Ben Sukhrambhai Member F Y Y Y D‐E 10 Tadvi Urmilaa Ben Pravinbhai Member F Y Y H‐I 11 Kolcha Santilal Bhukanbhai Member M Y Y Y E‐F 12 Nayka Chthiyabhai Bhuriyabhai Member M Y Y Y A‐E 13 Tadvi Arvindbhai Ranchodbhai Member M Y Y F‐H14 Rabari Nagjibhai L. Member M Y G‐I

Sr. No.

Names of WCs



UG SHG GP Any other



1

Zab(S)

Rathva Jambubhai Seriyabhai President M Y Y Y A‐B 2 Rathva Shankarbhai Lattubhai Wise‐President M Y Y Y B‐C3 K.V. Jadav (RFO) Member M Y Y Y A 4 Rathva Karanbhai Desingbhai Member M Y Y Y B


5 Rathva Kiritbhai Bhalabhai Member M Y Y Y D 6 Rathva Rameshbhai Bhalabhai Member M Y Y Y E 7 Rathva Kiranbhai Gosibhai Member M Y Y Y F8 Rathva Isubhai Metariyabhai Member M Y Y H 9 Rathva Kegli Ben Iswerbhai Member F Y Y Y A‐C10 Rathva Ratudi Ben Ambubhai Member F Y Y Y C‐E 11 Rathva Kamini Ben Gindubhai Member F Y Y Y F‐G 12 Rathva Blubhai Nayakdabhai Member M Y Y Y H 13 Nayaka Bindali Ben Karjubhai Member F Y Y I 14 Snehal K Tadvi Member F Y Y K Details of Registration number of Watershed committe: District: Vadodara Taluka: Jetpurpavi

Sr. No. Name Of Institute Registration Date AD 1860, Registration Summittee,

Section 21

AD 1950, Mumbai Public Trust, Under Section 29 (Registration

No. Of Public Trust)

1 Saloj Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee

17/7/2010 Gujarat/2871/Vadodara F/2554/Vadodara

2 Aambazati Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


3 Zab Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


4 Karsan Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


5 Bordha Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


6 Rajpur Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


7 Kundal Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee



8 Bhindol Groups Gram Panchayat Main Watershed Committee


ii )Self Help Group Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Men can also be member in SHG if it serves the common objective of the group. Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following observations: a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. b) Schemes like Sakhi mandal and SGSY are already operation at the village level but not to full extend. c) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders d) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people e) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

After a discussion through PRA and other foucus groupd discussion with villagers and local authorities of taluka panchayat and other developmental department, it was known that lack of awareness to villagers regarding such facilities and also due to the lengthy procedure of financial institutions has also become a major constraint.

Table no. 32: SHG details

Name of Village

S. No.

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women

With both

Total(Members) Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

Ambazati 3 ‐ 1 ‐ 10

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (ii) SF ‐ 5 5 ‐ 5 5 ‐ 2 2(iii) MF ‐ 4 4 ‐ 4 4 ‐ 1 1 (iv) LF ‐ 1 1 ‐ 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 1 ‐ 10 ‐ 10 10 ‐ 10 ST 10 ST ‐ 3 3

Bhindol 2 ‐ ‐ 1 10

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(ii) SF 2 2 4 2 2 4 ‐ 1 1 (iii) MF 2 3 5 2 3 5 ‐ ‐ ‐ (iv) LF 1 ‐ 1 1 ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ 1

Total 1 1 ‐ 10 5 5 10 5 ST 5 ST 10 ST ‐ 1 2


Bandi 5 1 ‐ ‐ 10

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (ii) SF 5 ‐ 5 5 ‐ 5 3 ‐ 3 (iii) MF 3 ‐ 3 3 ‐ 3 1 ‐ 1(iv) LF 2 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 ‐ ‐ 10 10 ‐ 10 10 ST ‐ 10ST 4 ‐ 4

BORDHA 2 ‐ ‐ 1 10

(i) Landless (ii) SF 5 5 10 5 ST 5 ST 10 5 5 10 (iii) MF ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(iv) LF ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total ‐ ‐ 1 10 5 5 10 5 ST 5 ST 10 5 5 10

Degala 4 1 ‐ ‐ 11

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(ii) SF 5 ‐ 5 5 ‐ 5 3 ‐ 3(iii) MF 4 ‐ 4 4 ‐ 4 3 ‐ 3(iv) LF 2 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 ‐ ‐ 11 11 ‐ 11 11ST ‐ 11 ST 6 ‐ 6

NANI AMROL

3 1 1 ‐ 22(ST)

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(ii) SF 4 6 10 4 6 10 11 11 22(iii) MF 7 5 12 7 5 12 0 ‐ ‐(iv) LF ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 1 ‐ 22 ST 11 11 22 ST 11 11 22 ST 11 11 22

KARSAN 5 1 ‐ ‐ 11

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(ii) SF 3 ‐ 3 9 ST ‐ 9 11 ‐ 11(iii) MF 8 ‐ 8 2 SC ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐ (iv) LF ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 3 ‐ ‐ 11 11 ‐ 11 11 ‐ 11 11 ‐ 11

Rajpur 1 1 ‐ ‐ 11

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐(ii) SF 5 ‐ 5 5 ‐ 5 2 ‐ 2 (iii) MF 4 ‐ 4 4 ‐ 4 1 ‐ 1 (iv) LF 2 ‐ 2 2 ‐ 2 ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 ‐ ‐ 11 11 ‐ 11 11 ST ‐ 11 ST 3 ‐ 3


SALOJ 4 1 1 ‐ 22

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (ii) SF 9 3 12 ‐ 3 12 7 5 12 (iii) MF 2 7 9 ‐ 7 9 ‐ ‐ ‐(iv) LF ‐ 1 1 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total 1 1 ‐ 22 11 11 22 ‐ 11 22 7 5 12

ZAB 1 ‐ 1 ‐ 24

(i) Landless ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ (ii) SF ‐ 15 15 ‐ 15 15 ‐ 10 10(iii) MF ‐ 9 9 ‐ 9 9 ‐ 8 8 (iv) LF ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Total ‐ 1 ‐ 24 ‐ 24 24 ‐ 24 24 ‐ 18 18 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. Table no. 33: UG detail

S. No. Village Total no. of UGs No. of members

No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1

Ambazati 2 0 6 8

(i)Landless (ii) SF 10 8 18 10 8 18 10 8 18 (iii) MF 15 6 21 15 6 21 15 6 21 (iv) LF

Total 2 6 8 25 14 39 25 14 39 25 14 39

2

Bhindol 6 0 5 11


Total 6 0 5 11 35 8 43 35 8 43 35 8 43


3

Bandi

4 0 5 9


Total 4 0 5 9 46 7 53 46 7 53 46 7 53

4

Bordha

0 1 3 4


Total 0 1 3 4 15 6 21 15 6 21 15 6 21

6

Degla

6 0 5 11


Total 6 0 5 11 35 8 43 35 8 43 35 8 43

5

Nani amrol

6 0 4 10

(i)Landless (ii) SF 26 6 32 26 6 32 26 6 32(iii) MF 20 3 23 20 3 23 20 3 23 (iv) LF

Total 46 9 55 46 9 55 46 9 55

7

Karsan

4 0 5 9


Total 4 0 5 9 46 7 53 46 7 53 46 7 53

8 Raipur(k) 3 0 3 6


Total 3 0 3 6 37 5 42 37 5 42 37 5 42


9

Saloj 20 5 0 25

(i)Landless (ii) SF 12 3 15 12 3 15 8 2 10(iii) MF (iv) LF

Total 12 3 15 12 3 15 8 2 10

10

Zab 2 0 9 11


Total 47 22 69 47 22 69 47 22 69 4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community to make them to feel the presence at the beginning of the project; generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that a particular amount was allotted for EPA activity for each of their villages, which is 4% of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities. Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sl No Names of Villages

Amount earmarked (Amount in

Rs.)

Entry Point Activities planned No of Items Estimated cost (Amount

in Rs.)

1 Ambazati 0.855 Repair of hand pumps with recharge structure 3 0.405 Building of Animal water Trough 1 0.450 Total 4 0.855

2 Bhindol 1.796

Hand Pump repair for drinking water with recharge structure 5 0.650 Building of Animal water Trough 1 0.506 Community Roof Rain water harvesting structure 1 0.640 Total 7 1.796


3 Bandi 2.364

Repair of community well and recharge structure 2 0.700 Building of Animal water Trough 1 0.504 Animal water trough in forest 1 0.530 Community Roof Rain water harvesting structure 1 0.630 Total 5 2.364

4 Bordha 0.932 Building of Animal water Trough 2 0.932 Total 2 0.932

5 Degla 4.723

Repair of Community well and recharge structure 1 0.500 Building of Animal water Trough with single phase motor to pump water.

3 1.920

Community roof water harvesting structure 2 1.203 Water purifier in School 1 0.100 Construction of toilets in the primary school 1 0.500 Water trough for Wild animals in forest 1 0.500 Total 9 4.723

6 Nani Amrol 1.459

Repair of hand pump in various faliya of village with recharge structure

40.930

Animal water trough 1 0.529 Total 5 1.459

7 Karsan 2.586

Repair of community well with recharge structure 1 0.620 Building of Animal water Trough 2 0.820 Community roof rain water harvesting structure 1 0.620 Water trough in forest for wild animals 1 0.526 Total 5 2.586

8 Rajpur 2.020

Repair of community well with recharge structure 1 0.400 Building of Animal water Trough 1 0.900Roof rain water harvesting structure 1 0.600Water purifier at primary school 1 0.100 Total 4 2.020


9 Saloj 1.850

Hand pump repair with recharge structure 3 0.650 Building of Animal water Trough 1 0.400 Roof Rain water harvesting structure 1 0.800 Total 4 1.850

10 Zab 2.308

Water purifier in school 1 0.133 Building of Animal water Trough 3 0.933 Roof Rain water harvesting structure 2 1.242 Total 6 2.308

Total 51 20.893 Watershed Development Works: Watershed work phase is the core component of the project. Creating permanent structures as required the slope, geology and topography starting from ridge to valley to conserve rain water at point of its incidence with ground. Trapping the water resources at right place at right time can great increase the effectiveness of this project. The objective being reclamation of natural resources and creating sustainability to assets created under this project. A multi‐tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. Ridge Area Treatment Plans: It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in Jetpurpavi IWMP‐1 watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Jetpurpavi IWMP‐1 watersheds following structure are been Proposed after interaction between the watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest and MDT and WDT engineer.

a. Graded Bunding b. Gully Plung a. Graded Bunding:

“Graded bunds or graded terraces or channel terraces are the bunds or terraces laid along a pre‐determined longitudinal grade very near the contour but not exactly along contour”. Suitability: The graded bunds, commonly used are comparable to the narrow base terraces. They are used for the safe, disposal of excess runoff high rainfall areas and rigious where the [Clay] soil is relatively impervious. Farming operations are not done on bunds or bund channels. Function:

1. These terraces act primarily as drainage channel to regulate and conduct runoff at non erosive velocity. 2. To make the runoff water to trickle rather than to rush out.


b. Gully Plunge:

The portion where the stream begins, the structure is construted with arraging loose boulder perpendicular to the flow of water is called gully plunge. Benefits: A. Prevents soil erosion of land and reduces the flow of water and further prevents the formation of new strems. B. Very useful in moisture conservation and reduces the scroucing and delsilation of the streams. Land Development The second tier treatment is the slope treatment. This is generally done on agricultural land or waste land. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. This being highly labour intensive, will involve more of manual labour; so, funds from National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) can be taken.Following structures are been proposed in these areas Farm Bunds: Bunding, also called a bund wall, is the area within a structure designed to prevent inundation or breaches of various types. Feild bunding is one of the important structures which check the runoff of water from the Farm level. Often Farm are left without proper bunding, water freely flows out of the Farm and scope for percolation is almost negligible. Hence Farm bunding plays a important role in conservation of moisture at Farm level. As the multi‐tier approach ridge to valley, drainage line treatment and land development Farm bund fall in the third agenda. Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs)

Name Of the Village

Institution 0.5%

Capacity 3.0%

IEC 1.5% Base Line

Survey 0.50% Hydro‐Geological Survey 0.25%

Technical Support Agencies

Printing Of DPR & Mapping Of

Project Area 0.25%

Estimated Cost (Rs. In Lakh)

Amabazati 10692 64152 32076 10692 5346 ‐ 5346 128304 Bhindol 22452 134712 67356 22452 11226 ‐ 11226 269424 Bandli 29562 177372 88686 29562 14781 ‐ 14781 354744 Bortha 11658 69948 34974 11658 5829 ‐ 5829 139896 Degla 59046 354276 177138 59046 29523 ‐ 29523 708552

Naniamrol 18240 109440 54720 18240 9120 ‐ 9120 218880 Karsan 32334 194004 97002 32334 16167 ‐ 16167 388008 Rajpur(k) 25260 151560 75780 25260 12630 ‐ 12630 303120 Saloj 23130 138780 69390 23130 11565 ‐ 11565 277560

Zab(Sajva) 28854 173124 86562 28854 14427 ‐ 14427 346248


Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S.no.

Village name

Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation / repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (Ha)

Storage Capacity

Estimated cost

No./Rmt

Area to be

irrigated (Ha)

Storage Capacity

Estimated Cost in lakhs

Area to be

irrigated

Storage Capacity

Estimated cost

REMARKS

1 Ambazati

Checkdam 3 21 Ha 8437mt 1.84 21 Ha 2437 Cmt 1.84 NREGA

Earthen Bunds 2 38 ha 2400 Cmt 1.34 38 ha 2400 Cmt 1.34 NREGA

Farm Ponds 3 7 Ha 750 Cmt 0.42 7 Ha 750 Cmt 0.42 NREGA

Farm Bunds

12000Rmt

0 30 Ha ‐ 3.34 (NREGA

) Masonary Checkwall

6 8.1 3000 Cmt. 3.56 8.1 3000 Cmt. 3.56

Masonary Checkdam

3 13.5 11250 Cmt

5.1 13.5 11250 Cmt

5.1

TOTAL 15.60

2 Bhindol

Earthen Bunds 2 30 ha 2150 Cmt 1.34 30 ha 2150 Cmt 1.34 NREGA Farm Ponds 6 12 Ha 1500 Cmt 0.9 12 Ha 1500 Cmt 0.9 NREGA

Farm Bunds

16000 Rmt

40 Ha

4.45 40 Ha

4.45 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

10 6 5000 7.52 6 5000 7.52

Masonary Checkdam

5 27.5 15875 10 27.5 15875 10

TOTAL 24.21

3 Bandi

Vilage Pond 1 65 Ha 2250 Cmt

1.25

65 Ha 2250 Cmt 1.25 NREGA


Farm Bunds

16000 Rmt

40 Ha

4.45 40 Ha

4.45 NREGA


Masonary Checkwall

10 11 4500 7.78 11 4500 7.78

Masonary Checkdam

5 18.5 18500 5 18.5 18500 5

TOTAL 21.71

4 Bordha

Village Pond 1 72 Ha 2500 Cmt

1.45


Checkdam 5 35 Ha 4062Cmt 3.06 35 Ha 4062Cmt 3.06 NREGA Earthen Bunds 6 90 ha 7000Cmt 4 90 ha 7000 Cmt 4 NREGA Farm Ponds 8 15Ha 2000 Cmt 1.12 15 Ha 2000 Cmt 1.12 NREGA

Farm Bunds

20000 Rmt

50 Ha

5.56 50 Ha

5.56 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

5 4 1850 2.95 4 1850 2.95

Masonary Checkdam

5 12 19250 7.5 12 19250 7.5

TOTAL 25.64

5 Degla


Farm Bunds

12000 Rmt

50 Ha

5.56 50 Ha

5.56 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

20 8.5 8650 15 8.5 8650 15

Masonary Checkdam

10 34 27500 20 34 27500 20

TOTAL

6 Nani Amrol

Checkdam 2 26 Ha. 1625 Cmt

1.2



Farm Bunds

8000 Rmt 20 Ha

2.22 20 Ha 2.22 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall 6 3.6 2450 5 3.6 2450 5


Masonary Checkdam

4 18 15000 8 18 1825 8

TOTAL 18.6

7 Karsan

Earthen Bunds 6 90 ha 7000Cmt 4 90 ha 7000 Cmt 4 NREGA Farm Ponds 5 7 Ha 1250 Cmt 0.7 7 Ha 1250 Cmt 0.7 NREGA

Farm Bunds

12000 Rmt

30 Ha

3.34 30 Ha

3.34 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

15 11.5 9500 12.78 11.5 9500 12.78

Masonary Checkdam

5 20.5 19250 10 20.5 19250 10

TOTAL 30.82

8 Rajpur (K)


1.65



Farm Bunds

24000 Rmt

60 Ha

6.67 60 Ha

6.67 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

6 4.8 5400 6 4.8 5400 6

Masonary Checkdam

6 28.8 20500 12 28.8 20500 12

TOTAL 28.36

9 Saloj


0.8



Farm Bunds

28000 Rmt

70 Ha

7.78 70 Ha

7.78 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall 5 9.5 6000 3.46 9.5 6000 3.46 Masonary Checkdam 5 25 22125 10 25 22125 10

TOTAL 23.94


10 Zab

Checkdam 3 20 Ha 1285 Cmt

1.1

20Ha 1285 Cmt 1.1 NREGA


Farm Bunds

12000 Rmt

30 Ha

3.34 30 Ha

3.34 NREGA

Masonary Checkwall

8 15.2 8000 7.8 15.2 8000 7.8

Masonary Checkdam

4 24.6 19600 8 24.6 19600 8

TOTAL 23.75 Convergence with MNREGA =89.25 Grand Total 253.36

Table no 36.1 Technical Details of Earthen Bund: Particulars Value Units

Structure Length 680 mt. Structure Height 1 mt. Upstream Slope 02:01 ‐

Downstream Slope 01:01 ‐ Bund Top Width 1 mt. Structure Base Width 4 mt. Structure Cross Section 2.5 sqm Table no. 36.2 Technical Details of Farm Pond

Particulars Value Unit Pond Length 10 mt.

Pond Width 10 mt. Pond Depth 2.5 mt.Side Slope 02:01


Table no . 36. 3 Technical Details of Feild/Farm Bund Particulars Value Units

Bund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha. Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt. Top Width 0.5 mt. Side Slope 01:01 Height 0.5 mt. Base Width 1.5 mt. Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM. Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas S. No. Names of Villages Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity per SHG(in Rs. Approx)

1 Ambazati Flour Mill Cum Rice Mill 3 75000 Vermicompost Unit 88000 Cattle Feed Stall 50000

2 Bhindol Vermicompost Unit 4 313000Cattle Feed Stall 100000

3 Bandi Vermicompost Unit 7 238000Flour Cum / Rise Mill 75000

Nursery raising of forestry plant(50000 plants) 150000 Nursery for growing of 50000 plants 150000

4 Bordha Flour Mill / Rice Mill 3 75000 Vermicompost Unit 150000

5 Degala Vermicompost Unit 7 250000 Flour mill / Rise Mill 75000

Nursery for growing of 50000 plants 300000Mahuda Oil Extraction Unit 250000

Poultry Unit 275000 Cattle Feed Stall 50000


6 Nani amrol Vegetable seed Stall 4 75000

Vermicompost Unit 275000 7 Karshan Cattle Feed Stall 8 50000

Vermicompost Unit 138000 Nursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) 150000

Poultry Unit 2750008 Rajpur Vermicompost Unit 5 250000

Nursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) 150000 Flour Mill / Rise Mill 75000

9 Saloj Nursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) 5 150000 Vermicompost Unit 300000

10 Zab Flour Mill / Rise Mill 5 75000Vermicompost Unit 188000

Poultry Unit 275000 Table no. 39.1 Soil and water conservation activities of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S. No

Name of villages

Graded bunding(R)

Staggerd C. Trenches

Terrece Pond Gully

pluge(R) Farm bunds(L)

Masonary check wall(D)

Masonary check dam(D)

Afforestation 75%

Live fencing 25%

Total Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs)

(in Rmt)

(in lakh)

(in Rmt)

(in lakh)

No of Units

(in lakh)

(in Cmt)

(in lakh)

(in Rmt)

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

No.of units

(in lakh)

Ha Rs. In Lakh

Rmt Rs. In Lakh

1 Ambazati 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 1.12 0 0 6 3.56 3 5.1 3.6 0.684 1140 0.228 10.692

2 Bhindol 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 1.52 0 0 10 7.52 5 10 13.47 2.559 4265 0.853 22.452

3 Bandi 300 1.35 3800 0.35 2 0.3 1000 3.9 8000 2.22 10 7.78 5 10 14.46 2.7465 4578 0.9155 29.562

4 Bordha 0 0 2500 0.2 0 0 250 1.12 0 0 5 2.98 5 7.5 0.229 0.0435 72.5 0.0145 11.858

5 Degla 1200 4.05 4000 0.38 3 0.37 1500 6.05 16000 4.45 20 15 10 20 34.52 6.5595 10933 2.1865 59.046

6 Nani Amrol

300 1.35 0 0 0 0 250 1.12 0 0 6 5 4 8 10.93 2.0775 3463 0.6925 18.24

7 Karsan 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 2.5 8000 2.22 15 12.78 5 10 19.08 3.6255 6043 1.2085 32.334

8 Rajpur(K) 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 2.25 0 0 6 6 6 12 19.78 3.7575 6263 1.2525 25.26

9 Saloj 500 1.7 0 0 0 0 1000 4.5 0 0 5 3.46 5 10 13.7 2.6025 4338 0.8675 23.13

10 Zab(S) 700 2.38 0 0 0 0 1000 4.5 8100 2.25 8 7.8 4 8 15.49 2.943 4905 0.981 28.854

Total 3000 10.83 10300 0.93 5 0.67 6600 28.58 40100 11.14 91 71.88 52 100.6 145 27.599 45998 9.200 261.428


Table no 39.2 Agriculture and Aforestation related activites of watershed works phase – Proposed Target

S.No Name of Villages

Nursery Raising Vegetable Nursery

Crop Demonstation

Plot Horticulture Plot

Fodder/Pasture Development

Meditional Plot Total

Estimated Cost Rs. in

Lakh Ha In Lakh No In

Lakh No

In Lakh

Ha In Lakh Ha In Lakh Ha In Lakh

1 Ambazati 0 0 0 0 3 0.38 2.8 0.88 3 0.21 0.08 0.75 2.22 2 Bhindol 0 0 1 0.6 7 0.88 4 1.25 8 0.56 0.08 0.75 4.04 3 Bandi 0.07 1.5 1 0.6 10 1.25 4 1.25 5 0.35 0.12 1.13 6.08 4 Borda 0 0 1 0.6 2 0.25 2 0.63 2 0.14 0.04 0.38 2 5 Degla 0.14 3 2 1.2 25 3.13 8.8 2.75 20 1.4 0.16 1.5 12.98 6 Nani Amrol 0 0 1 0.6 5 0.63 2 0.63 2 0.14 0.04 0.38 2.387 Karsan 0.07 1.5 1 0.6 12 1.5 6 1.88 10 0.7 0.08 0.75 6.93 8 Rajpur(K) 0.07 1.5 1 0.6 8 1 2.8 0.88 15 1.05 0.08 0.75 5.78 9 Saloj 0.07 1.5 1 0.6 8 1 2.4 0.75 10 0.7 0.08 0.75 5.3 10 Zab(S) 0 0 1 0.6 10 1.25 5.2 1.63 15 1.05 0.08 0.75 5.28

Total 0.42 9 10 6 90 11.27 40 12.53 90 6.3 0.84 7.89 52.99Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* S. No.

Village name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line(D

)

(iii)Land dev. (L)

(i)Pri‐vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./

cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh) Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

M W O T

1 Ambazati Gulley Pluge R L P C Watershed Committee

250 Cmt 0.45 0.67 1.12 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall

D L P C Watershed Committee

6 No. 2.14 1.42 3.56 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam

D L P C UGs/ Watershed committee

3 No. 3.06 2.04 5.1 June 2012

Total 5.65 4.13 9.78 June 2012


2

Bhindol

Gulley Pluge L P C Watershed Committee

350 Cmt 0.61 0.91 1.52 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


10 No. 4.5 3.02 7.52 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


5 No. 6 4 10 June 2012

Total

11.11 7.93 19.04 June 2012

3 Bandi Graded bunding R L P C Forest Watershed Committee

300 Rmt 0.54 0.81 1.35 June 2012

Staggered C. Trenches

R C Forest Watershed Committee

3800 Rmt 0.35 0.35 June 2012

Terrece Pond R C Forest Watershed Committee

2 No.s 0.30 0.30 June 2012

Gulley Pluge R L P C F Watershed Committee

1000 Cmt. 1.55 2.35 3.90 June 2012

Farm Bunds L P Watershed Committee

8000 Rmt 0.44 1.78 2.22 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall

D L P C F Watershed Committee

10 No. 4.67 3.11 7.78 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam

D L P C F UGs/ Watershed committee

5 No. 6 4 10 June 2012

Total 13.20 12.70 25.9 June 2012

4 Bordha Staggered C. Trenches


2500 Rmt 0.20 0.20 June 2012

Gulley Pluge R L P C Watershed Committee

250 Cmt 0.25 0.67 0.92 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


5No. 1.80 1.18 2.98 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


5 No. 4.5 3 7.5 June 2012

Total

6.55 5.05 11.6 June 2012


5 Degla Graded bunding R L P C Watershed Committee

1200 Rmt 1.60 2.45 4.05 June 2012

Staggered C. Trenches


4000 Rmt 0.38 0.38 June 2012

Terrece Pond R C Forest Watershed Committee

3 No.s 0.37 0.37 June 2012


1500 Cmt. 2.02 4.03 6.05 June 2012


16000 Rmt 0.89 3.56 4.45 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


20 No. 9 6 15 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


10 No. 12 8 20 June 2012

Total 25.51 24.79 50.3 June 2012

6 Nani Amrol Graded bunding R L P C Watershed Committee

300 Rmt 0.54 0.81 1.35 June 2012


250 Cmt 0.45 0.67 1.12 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


6 No. 3 2 5 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


4 No. 4.8 3.2 8 June 2012

Total 8.79 6.68 15.47 June 2012

7 Karsan Gulley Pluge L P C Watershed Committee

500 Cmt. 1 1.5 2.5 June 2012


8000 Rmt 0.44 1.78 2.22 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


15 No. 7.67 5.11 12.78 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


5 No. 6 4 10 June 2012

Total 15.11 12.39 27.5 June 2012


8 Rajpur (K) Gulley Pluge L P C Watershed Committee

500 Cmt. 0.9 1.35 2.25 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


6 Nos. 3.6 2.4 6 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


6 No. 7.2 4.8 12 June 2012

Total 11.7 8.55 20.25 June 2012

9 Saloj Graded bunding R L P C Watershed Committee

500Rmt 0.68 1.02 1.7 June 2012


1000 Cmt. 1.8 2.7 4.5 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


5 No. 2.08 1.38 3.46 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


5 No. 6 4 10 June 2012

Total 10.56 9.1 19.66 June 2012

10 Zab Graded bunding R L P C Watershed Committee

700 Rmt 0.95 1.43 2.38 June 2012


1000 Cmt. 1.8 2.7 4.5 June 2012


8100Rmt 0.45 1.8 2.25 June 2012

Masonary Checkwall


8 No. 4.68 3.12 7.8 June 2012

Masonary Checkdam


4 No. 4.8 3.2 8 June 2012

Total 12.68 12.25 24.93

Grand Total 122.01 102.37 224.43


Table no 40.1. Details of activies proposed and their Survey no/ Reference/ GPS co‐ordiantes Sr. No. Name of

village Activity Proposed Quantity in

Rmt/No/Cmt Expected Expenditure

(Rs. In Lakhs) Reference No. / GPS Co‐ ordinates

1 Bandi

Graded bunding 300 Rmt 1.35 132/1, 132/2, 33,131/1, 131/2 Gulley Pluge 1000 Cmt. 4.5 132/1, 132/2, 33,131/1, 131/2 Farm Bunds 8000 Rmt 2.22 130, 125/2, 133p2, 3/1, 78, 47/1, 62, 114,

85, 103125/1p2, 119 Masonary Checkwall 10 No. 7.78 22˚14'53" ‐ 73˚54'53.6"

22˚30'48" ‐ 73˚55'1.43"22˚13'59" ‐ 73˚55'20.8" 22˚13'52" ‐

73˚55'20.6"22˚13'20" ‐ 73˚55'37"

22˚13'41" ‐ 73˚55'31.2"22˚13'39" ‐ 73˚55'21.5" 22˚13'53" ‐ 73˚55'53.6"

Masonary Checkdam 5 No. 10 22˚13'22.4"‐73˚54'17"22˚14'53" ‐73˚54'56.8" 22˚15'51.2" ‐73˚55'27.5" 22˚13'15.2" ‐73˚55'11.9"22˚13'26" ‐73˚54'31.1"

2 Ambazati

Gulley Pluge 250 Cmt 1.12 121, 102, 103/1, 127, 195/1, 262/1, 251/2 104, 176/3

Masonary Checkwall 6 No. 3.56 7/2, 4/2, 106p, 103/2, 7/2Masonary Checkdam 3 No. 5.1 9, 124, 111, 6/1, 186/1,145/1

3 Bhindol

Gulley Pluge 350 Cmt 1.52 332, 420, 375, 305, 290, 387, 402, 411, 268/2

Masonary Checkwall 10 No. 7.52 292, 244, 303, 363, 341, 349, 144, 140, 238, 112/2

Masonary Checkdam 5 No. 10 276, 382, 469, 119, 108


4 Bordha

Gulley Pluge 250 Cmt 1.12 186, 641, 637, 639, 638, 640, 488, 108, 267, 494/1

Masonary Checkwall 5No. 2.95 186, 641, 637, 639, 638, 640, 488, 108, 267, 670, 494/2,

Masonary Checkdam 5 No. 7.5 186, 637, 641, 108, 4805 Degla

Graded bunding 1200 Rmt 4.08 88, 65, 87/1/a, Gulley Pluge 1500 Cmt. 6.8 88, 65, 87/1/a, 53, 11, 5/2, 32/1 Farm Bunds 16000 Rmt 4.45 13, 11, 56, 51/1, 24, 59/1, 72, 13, 81/1,

79/2, 74, 28/2, 42, 44, 6, 22, 67, 48/2, 31/p1, 32/2/p1, 33/2, 33/1, 75, 55, 34,

40/1, 15/3, 8/2, 87/10, 87/12, 87/25, 37p, 7p, 48/1p, 53, 31/p2, 234, 148, 308, 268

Masonary Checkwall 20 No. 15 44, 88, 65, 87/1/a, 25, 29, 30, 21, 22, 24, 17, 15/1, 57, 56

Masonary Checkdam 10 No. 20 32/2, 32/1, 17, 75, 74, 59/1, 41, 27 6 Nani Amrol

Graded bunding 300 Rmt 1.35 106/1, 72, 119, 216, 247, 260, 63/2, 50 Gulley Pluge 250 Cmt 1.12 233, 20, 40, 106/1, 50, 314, 310, 147, 145, 320

Masonary Checkwall 6 No. 5 195, 4, 106/1, 11/2, 177/1, 176, 173Masonary Checkdam 4 No. 8 72, 9, 126, 44

7 Karsan

Gulley Pluge 500 Cmt. 2.5 392/1, 98p2, 302 Farm Bunds 8000 Rmt 2.22 251, 128, 415, 159/3, 372, 229, 362

Masonary Checkwall 15 No. 12.78 102, 104, 100, 99, 407, 382, 385, 324, 269/1, 262, 358, 248, 500, 449, 362, 103,

98, 112, Masonary Checkdam 5 No. 10 48/1, 48/2, 482, 421/1, 361, 257, 235/1

8 Rajpur (K)

Gulley Pluge 500 Cmt. 2.25 126, 128, 129, 359, 27/2, 116, 210, 212, 213, 252, 240/4

Masonary Checkwall 6 Nos. 6 364, 37, 133, 314, 273, 283

Masonary Checkdam 6 No. 12 83, 137, 61, 4, 210, 209, 240/1


9 Saloj

Graded bunding 500Rmt 1.7 301/1, 99, 186, 79, 221, 147, 85, 211, 65, 239

Gulley Pluge 1000 Cmt. 4.5 237, 228, 297/3, 294/2, 2, 3, 238, 292, 291/5, 282/2, 22, 23, 235, 81, 200, 184,

222, 189, 239 Masonary Checkwall 5 No. 3.46 69, 151, 199, 211, 297/1, 239 Masonary Checkdam 5 No. 10 208/2, 72/2, 39, 224/1, 72/2

10 Zab

Graded bunding 700 Rmt 2.38 393p, 208, 210, 30, 27, 24, 183 , 126, 255, 257, 50/1

Gulley Pluge 1000 Cmt. 4.5 393p, 119, 176, 71, 250, 96, 182, 227, 237, 233/2 230, 94/2, 106, 75/1, 88, 107/2, 25,

9, 188 Farm Bunds 8100Rmt 2.25 123, 138/2, 188, 189, 249, 245, 53/1, 104,

101, 97, 222/1, 70, 159, 161, 225, 307, 263, 366, 276, 93, 144

Masonary Checkwall 8 No. 7.8 76/2, 51, 25, 174, 187, 147, 104, 107/1, 256 Masonary Checkdam 4 No. 8 123, 74, 107/2, 199/2, 83/1

Table no 40.2.Techincal Specification Graded Bunding Particulars Value Units

Top width of bund 1 mt. Bottom width of Bund 1 mt.Depth above ground level 1 mt.Depth of Foundation 0.2 mt. Cross section of bund 1 sq. mProposed Area 750 ha.Table no 40.3.Techincal Specification Farm Bund

Particulars Value UnitsBund Length Per Ha. 400 mt.Proposed Area(area of farm) 1 Ha. Total Bund Length For Proposed Area 400 mt. Top Width 0.5 mt.


Side Slope 01:01 Height 0.5 mt.Base Width 1.5 mt.Cross‐Section of Farm bund 0.5 SqM.Table 40.4.Techincal specification Masonary Checkwall S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1

Excavation Body wall 1 16 1.5 1 24Key wall 2 2 0.6 1 2.4

26.4 Cmt. 55.64 1468.896 2

C. C. In Foundation and Plinth (B) 1 16 1.5 0.3 7.2 (K) 2 2 0.6 0.3 0.72

7.92 Cmt. 1586.5 12565.08

3

UCR Masonary in Foundation and Plinth (B)

1 16 1.5 0.7 16.8

(K) 2 2 0.6 0.7 1.68 Super Structure (B) 1 16 1.5+0.60/2 1 16.8

(K) 2 2 0.6 1 2.4 37.68 Cmt. 1509.9 56893.03 4

Coping for CC (1:2:4) (B) 1 16 0.6 0.1 0.96 (K) 2 2 0.6 0.1 0.24

1.2 Cmt. 2363.7 2836.44 5

Cement Pointing (B) 1 16 1 16 (K) 2 2 0.6 2.4

18.4 Sq. mt. 41.3 784.7 Total 74548.15

Add 2% W.C. 1490.96 76039.11 Say 76000/‐


40.4.1.Corss –Section of Check wall with its side wall Dimensions:


Table no 40.5.Techincal Specification Masonary Checkdam S.no Particular No. Length Width H/D/T Quantity Unit Rate Amount 1

Excavation Mt. Mt. Mt. Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.9 22.95Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.45 3.51Bucket 1 17 5 0.45 38.25 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.45 1.08 1 2 0.6 0.45 0.54

66.33 Cmt. 68.4 4536.972 2

Excavation in Soft rock Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.3 7.65 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.3 2.34 Bucket 1 17 4 0.25 17Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18

27.53 Cmt. 177.2 4878.316 3

Filling the Foundation Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.15 3.825Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.15 1.17Bucket 1 17 5 0.15 12.75Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.15 0.36 1 2 0.6 0.15 0.18

18.29 Cmt. 1403.4 25661.17 4

UCR Masonary in (1) Foundatlion Main Body 1 17 1.5 0.55 14.025 Side Wall 2 6.5 0.6 0.55 4.29 Bucket 1 17 5 0.3 25.5 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 0.6 1.44 1 2 0.6 0.6 0.72 45.98

46.00 Cmt. 1516 69736


(2) Superstructure Main Body 1 17 1.05 1.4 24.99 Side Wall 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44 2 5 0.6 1.05 6.3Key Wall 2 4 0.6 0.6 2.88 2 2 0.6 0.6 1.44Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.6 6.12 43.17

44 Cmt. 1516 667045

Coping Top of the main bodywall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02Toe Wall 1 17 0.6 0.1 1.02 Bucket flooring 1 17 4 0.1 6.8 8.84

9 Cmt. 1934.4 17409.6 6

Plaster in (1:3) Main Body 1 17 1.25 21.25 Body wall slop 1 17 1.74 29.58 50.83

51 Sq. mt. 70.2 3580.2 7

Cement Pointing (1:3) Side wall 4 4 1.05 16.8 Key Wall 1 4 0.6 2.4 1 2 0.6 1.2 20.4

21 Sq. mt. 40.5 850.58 Name Plate (30cm * 30cm) 1 1 No. 434.9 434.9 Total 193791.7 3% Conti. 5813.75 199605.4 199600/‐


Table no.41.1: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line(D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (ha) No. of

plants(rmt)

Estimated cost(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Ambazati

Afforestation R L F WC 3.6 0.684 June‐13,

Live Green mannuring fencing

L

C F UG,WC 0 1140 0.228 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 3

0.21 June‐13,

Nursary Raising L C UG 0 0 June‐13,

Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 3 0.38 June‐13,

Meditation Plot L P 2 0.75 June‐13,

Horticulture Plot/Plant L C F UG 7 0.88 June‐13,

Total 3.132

2 Bhindol



L

C F UG,WC 0 4315 0.863 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 8

0.56 June‐13,





Total 6.892 June‐13,

3 Bandi



L

C F UG,WC 0 4577.5 0.9155 June‐13,



L

C

SHG/UG 5

0.35 June‐13,

Nursary Raising L C UG 0.07 1.5 June‐13,




Total 9.1415

4 Bordha



L

C F UG,WC 0 72.5 0.0145 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 2

0.14 June‐13,





Total 1.348 June‐13,

5 Degala



L

C F UG,WC 0 10932.5 2.186 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 20

1.4 June‐13,

Nursary Raising L C UG 0.14 3 June‐13,




Total 20.525

6 Nani amarol



L

C F UG,WC 0 3425 0.685 June‐13,



L

C

SHG/UG 2

0.14 June‐13,





Total 4.52

7 Karshan



L

C F UG,WC 0 6042.5 1.208 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 10

0.7 June‐13,





Total 11.163

8 Rajpur



L

C F UG,WC 0 6200 1.24 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 15

1.05 June‐13,


Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 8 1 June‐13,



Total 10.14

9 Saloj



L

C F UG,WC 0 4287.5 0.857 June‐13,



L

C

SHG/UG 10

0.7 June‐13,


Crop Demonstration plot L P UG 8 1 June‐13,



Total 8.129

10 Zab



L

C F UG,WC 0 4942.5 0.988 June‐13,


L

C

SHG/UG 15

1.05 June‐13,





Total 8.633

Table no .41.1 Technical Details of Aforestation Activities/Plantation/Grass seeding: Particulars Value Unit

Crop Name Plant To Plant Spacing 3 mt Row To Row Spacing 3 mt Pit Length 1.5 ftPit Width 1.5 ftPit Depth 1.5 ftNo. of Plants 1111Plantation Area 1 1 HaNo. of Plants Per Ha. 1111 1 HaGap Filling 20% 225


Table No. 41.1.1 Cost Estimation For Afforestation Activity (For 1000 Plants)Sr. No.

Description No. Length Width (m.)

Depth (m.)

Unit Quantity Rate Amount

1 Digging of pits for plants in ordinary murum 1000 1.5 ft 1.5 ft 1.5 ft ‐ 1000 2.00 2000

2 Plants sampling for plantation In Govt. pasture area, sampling not less than 30cm. Height

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1000 2 2000

3 Transportation of plants from nursery to camp site up to 5km 1000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1000 1 1000 4 Loding and unloding plants ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1000 ‐ 1000

5 Rehandling of plants from camp site up to actual planting site upto 200m.

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1000 ‐ 500

6 Cost of fertiliser & insecticides incl. application ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12007 Weeding and Hoeing two times (Twice in year) 1000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1000 3 3000

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities S. No.

Name of village

Name of activity Type of land Executing agency

Target

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG(ii)SHG(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost(Rs. in

lakh)

Expected month & year of completion (mm/yyyy)

1 Ambazati

Production Systems Agri‐Horticulture Medicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 JuneCrop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 0.38 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.88 2013 JuneDairy Development Fodder Plot (1 Acre) P C UG 0.21 2013 June Animal Health Camp P UG 0.50 2013 June Total 2.71 Micro‐enterprise & Agro processing Flour mill cum rice mill P SHG 0.75 2013 June


Vermicompost Unit P SHG 0.88 2013 June Cattle Feed stall P SHG 0.50 2013 June Total 2.13 Grand village Total 4.34

2 Bhindol

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 June Vegetable Nursery in Net house P UG 0.60 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 0.88 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 1.25 2013 June Drip irrigation in cotton/tur P UG 1.33 2013 June Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.56 2013 June Animal Health Camp P UG 0.40 2013 June Total 5.77Micro‐enterprise & Agro processingFarm Implements P SHG/UG 0.30 2013 JuneCattle Feed Stall P SHG 1.00 2013 JuneVermicompost unit P SHG 3.13 2013 JuneTotal 4.43Grand Village Total 10.19

3 Bandi

Production Systems Agriculture & Horticulture Medicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 1.13 2013 June Vegetable Nursery in net house P UG 0.60 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 1.25 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 1.25 2013 June Drip irrigation in cotton/tur P UG 1.14 2013 June Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.35 2013 June


Animal Health Camp P UG 0.40 2013 June Total 6.12 Micro‐enterprise Vermi‐compost unit P SHG 2.38 2013 JunePoultry Unit (SHG) P SHG 2.75 2013 JuneFloor mill / Rise mill P SHG 0.75 2013 JuneNursery raising of forestry plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.50 2013 June

Total 7.38Grand Village Total 13.50

4

Bordha

Production Systems Agriculture & Horticulture Medicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.38 2013 June vegetable Nursery in net house P UG 0.60 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 0.25 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.63 2013 June Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.14 2013 June Milk Collection Centre P UG 0.80 2013 June Animal Health Camp P UG 0.20 2013 June Total 2.99 Micro‐enterprise flour mill cum rice mill P SHG 0.75 2013 Junevermicompost unit P SHG 1.50 2013 JuneTotal 2.25Grand Village Total 5.24

5

Degala

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 1.50 2013 June Vegetable Nursery in net house P UG 1.20 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 3.13 2013 June


Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 2.75 2013 June Drip irrigation in cotton/tur P UG 3.23 2013 June Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 1.40 2013 JuneMilk collection Centre P UG 0.80 2013 JuneAnimal Health Camp P UG 0.60 2013 JuneTotal 14.01Micro‐enterprise & Agro processingFlour mill cum rice mill P SHG 0.75 2013 June Vermi‐compost unit P SHG 2.50 2013 JuneNursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) P SHG 3.00 2013 June Mahuda Oil extraction Unit P SHG 2.50 2013 June Poultry Unit P SHG 2.75 2013 June Cattle feed stall P SHG 0.50 2013 June Farm impliment P SHG/UG 0.30 2013 June Total 12.30 2013 June Grand Village Total 26.91

6 Naniamoral

Production Systems Agriculture & Horticulture Medicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.38 2013 June vegatable Nursary in net house P UG 0.60 2013 JuneCrop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 0.63 2013 JuneHorticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.63 2013 JuneHorticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.57 2013 JuneDairy Development PMilk Collection Centre P UG 0.80 2013 JuneFodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.14 2013 JuneAnimal Health Camp P UG 1.00 2013 June Total P 4.74 Micro‐enterprise & Agro processing P


Vegetable seed store P SHG 0.75 2013 June Vermicompost unit P SHG 2.75 2013 JuneTotal 3.50Grand Village Total 8.24

7

Karshan

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 June vegatable Nursary in net house P UG 0.60 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 1.50 2013 JuneHorticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 1.88 2013 JuneDrip irrigation in one vigha for cotton/tur P UG 2.28 2013 JuneDairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.70 2013 JuneAnimal Health Camp P UG 0.60 2013 JuneTotal 8.31Micro‐enterprise & Agro processing Cattle feed store P SHG 0.50 2013 June vermicompost unit P SHG 1.38 2013 June Nursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.50 2013 June Poltry Unit (1 SHG) P SHG 2.75 2013 June Farm impliment SHG/UG 0.30 2013 June Total 6.43 Grand Village Total 14.73

8

Rajpur

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 JuneVegetable Nursery in net house P UG 0.60 2013 June Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 1.00 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.88 2013 June Drip irrigation in cotton/tur P C UG 1.52 2013 June


Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P UG 1.05 2013 June Animal Health Camp P UG 0.60 2013 June Total 6.40Micro‐enterprise & Agro processingVermi‐compost unit P SHG 2.50 2013 JuneNursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.50 2013 JuneFloor mill / Rise mill P SHG 0.75 2013 JuneTotal 4.75 Grand Village Total 11.15

9 Saloj

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 JuneVegatable growing in net house P UG 0.60 2013 JuneCrop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 1.00 2013 JuneDrip irrigation in cotton/tur P UG 1.25 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 JuneDairy Development Animal Health Camp P UG 0.60 2013 June Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 0.70 2013 June Total 5.65 Micro‐enterprise & Agro processing Vermi‐compost unit P SHG 3.00 2013 June Nursery raising for forestry plant(50000 plants) P SHG 1.50 2013 June Total 4.50 Grand Village Total 10.15

10 Zab

Production Systems Agriculture & HorticultureMedicinal plot (Aloevera) 1 acre P UG 0.75 2013 Junevegetable Nursery in net house P UG 0.60 2013 June


Crop Demonstration plot/ 1 acre P UG 1.25 2013 June Horticulture plot (vadi)‐1 acre P UG 1.63 2013 June Drip irrigation in Cotton/tur P UG 1.52 2013 June Dairy Development Fodder plot(1 acre) P C UG 1.05 2013 JuneAnimal Health Camp P UG 0.60 2013 JuneTotal 7.40Micro‐enterprise & Agro processingvermicompost unit P SHG 1.88 2013 June Flour mill cum rice mill P SHG 0.75 2013 JunePoltry Unit (1 SHG) P SHG 2.75 2013 June Farm Implements P SHG/UG 0.15 2013 June

Total 5.53 Grand Village Total 12.33

Production System –I Vermicompost Unit: Wastes are nothing but misplaced resources. A large volume of organic matter is generated from agricultural activities, in dairy farms and animal wastes which are usually dumped in corners where it putrefies, usually emanating foul smell. This valuable resource can be utilised by properly composting it into a value‐added end product called manure. The chief objective is to compost organic wastes not for the disposal of solid organic wastes but also to produce superior quality manure to feed our “nutrient/organic matter hungry” soils. Organic wastes can be broken down and fragmented rapidly by earthworms within short period of time. Vermicompost considerable enhances the soil fertility of and N,P,K are totally available to the plants. The water holding capacity of the soil is increased and also help in binding the soil particles together. It should be realized that vermicomposting can be a useful cottage industry for the underprivileged and the economically weak as it can provide them with a supplementary income. If every village can formulate a cooperative society or SHG’s of unemployed youth/women group, it could be a wise venture for them to produce vermicompost and sell it back to the village or firm at a recommended price. The youth will not only earn money, but also aid society by providing excellent quality organic manure for sustainable agro‐practices. This is one of the simplest process where 5 mt.(length) * 1.5 mt (width) beds with 0.5 depth are made on the ground and in the backyard and is filled by 3 month old manure and worms are introduced @ 1/2 kg/ sq.ft. These worms voraciously feed on the manure turning it to granulated compost with 45 day period of time. Hence yearly 8 cycles can be taken within 1 year of time. The proposed model is ideally suitably for the individual beneficiary.


Components of Vermicompost Unit: About Worm Species: Non‐Borrowing Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae is the scientific name of the worms commonly found in Indian soil. They are non‐ borrowing and surface feeders and go maximum up to a depth of 1‐ 1.5 mts. Feeds on decomposing organic matter and well decomposed manure. They are voracious feeders and survive in most of the stressed conditions. Shade Net/ Green Net: A net with 90% shade with steel pipes of 72 running ft for supporting the shade net is recommended and suitable for the construction of a ideal vermicompost unit. The main purpose of shade net is to minimize the sunlight to maximum possible extend and allow only that amount which is essential for keeping worm alive and maintaining a warmer vicinity. Tools and Implements: Some tools and implements are required a crowbar, spade, rose can for watering and sieve for sieving the vermicompost for separating the compost without injury to the earth worms when the compost is ready for packing and storing. Vermi‐Composting Beds: Customized beds were prepared based upon areas requirement and availability of the manure and raw material. The dimension of bed for this specific area are as follows 5mt length *1.5 width * 0.5 mt depth. Manure is introduced into the beds at the rate of 1200 kgs and 400 kgs organic farm waste. These types of beds are feasible and require less space and are good example of the small scale commercial unit for a individual beneficiary at village level Land and worms requirement: Area of 502 meter is need to cover two bed of above mentioned dimensions. The beds are made up of bricks at sides and bottom to maintain the proper structure and depth to ensure viable structure for long period of time. Worms are introduced @ 250 worms for meter 2. This the optimum population for this bed of this dimension to ensure proper multiplication of worms and composting in desired period of time.. Proposed Model of 2 bed Dimension (5mt *1.5mt*0.5mt): Sr. No.

Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost

1 Vermiculture (Eisenia fetida) 15 kg Rs. 300/kg 4500 2 Shade net/ Green net of 90 % shade 54 sq.mt Rs. 30/mt 16203 Steel pipes galvanized for supporting the shed 100 ft Rs. 25/sq.ft 25004 Fencing 18 mts Rs. 50/mt 900 5 Labour charges of installation of shed and shade net ‐ ‐ 500 6 Expenditure for the transport of material ‐ ‐ 400


7 Expenditure of bricks for construction of vermi‐beds 200 Rs 3.00 600 8 Spade and basket ‐ ‐ 200 9 Nuts bolts and other accessories for fixing the shed ‐ ‐ 300 10 Rose can for water the vermin‐beds ‐ ‐ 250 11 Sieve with wooden frame ‐ ‐ 250 Total: Fixed Cost 12020

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) Unit Total

1 Raw material 800 2 Transportation 500 3 Miscellaneous 200 Total Variable Cost 1500

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs. 1500 2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 1050 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 1.4

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) Include the cost of vermicompost and verms

3.6

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 3780 6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 2.2

7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 2280 Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin = 12020/2.2=5463.6 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 1.52


Production System‐II Introduction: Rural economy is mainly based upon the agriculture, agriculture growth on the other hand is decelerated at macro level with un‐ profitable remuneration, crop failure with adverse climatic condition coupled with falling real prices of farm products, and contributing population from agriculture to non‐agricultural sector. Added to these problems is the problem of depleting and degrading natural base for farming, threatening the very livelihood security of a majority of subsistence farmers. The farming industry is getting un‐remunerative, the failures of identifying right growth priorities within farming sector, have culminated in farmer’s distress. At this juncture horticultural crops are new hope in providing economic security and further growth. The production and consumption of horticultural products could play a key role in providing nutrition and health security to the people and especially on the income of farmers. Further, given the high degree of agricultural development segmentation with a small percentage of commercial farmers and a great majority of subsistence farmers, horticultural development could provide an opportunity to bring the subsistence and bypass farmers into the development orbit; if the appropriate technologies are identified and implemented. Horticultural crops can augment employment‐income generation to ensure livelihood security of the subsistence farmers without further depleting and degrading the natural resource base for achieving livelihood security and increased economic growth, Production Details of Fruit Crops: Table‐1 S.no Name of Fruit Crop Plants

per acre Specing Production details every years (plants / kg)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 Kesar Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 15 15 25 40 60 95 Rajapuri Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 20 25 35 60 80 120Langdo Mango 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 15 30 35 45 75 100

2 Sapota (Kalipati) 40 10 X 10 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 20 35 45 75 100 120 140 3 Guava 110 6 x 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 25 45 80 110 125 135 1504 Custard Apple (Balanagari) 80 5 X 5 MT. ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 7 11 13 15 18 205 Ber (Gola / Umaran) 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ 2 8 35 55 75 100 125 150 1756 Kagadi Lemon 110 6 X 6 MT. ‐ ‐ 10 20 35 45 60 85 120 150

Details of Expenditure for Mango plantation: Table‐2

Sr No Particulars Expenditure in. Rs.1 40 pits of 3 x 3 x 5 fect 5002 Grafted mango plants (40) / 70 Rs. Plants 2800


3 Transportation 1200 4 Thorry fencing 800 5 Fertilizer / Insecticides in pits (40) 1500 6 Plantation & after care expenditure 22007 Irrigation to plants 3500

Total 12500Production Parameters: Kesar variety of mango yields 15kg per plant of 5 years of times and keeps on increasing as growth proceeds.

Particulars Year Increase in production in

QtlIn Rs.

A Initial Investment Rs. 12,000 B Production /year(15kg/40 Plants) 6C Gross income/ Year for 600kg @( Rs.3500/100kg) 6*3500 21000

D

Net Income/ Year* (C‐A) 5th Year 9000 Net Income/ Year* 6th Year =(20*40) 8*3500 28000 Net Income/ Year* 7th Year=(25*40) 10*3850 38500 Net Income/ Year* 8th Year=(40*40) 16*4235 67760 Net Income/ Year* 9th Year=(60*40) 24*4658 111792 Net Income/ Year* 10th Year=(95*40) 38*5123 194674

Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total I Fixed Cost a Digging of pits (3*3*5 ft) 40 Rs. 12.50 Rs. 500 b Granfted Mango Plants 40 Rs. 70 Rs. 2,800c Transportation cost 40 Rs. 30.00 Rs. 1,200.00d Throny Fencing Rs. 800.00 e Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits Rs. 1,500.00f Plantation & after care expenditure 40 Rs. 55.00 Rs. 2,200.00g Irrigation to plants Rs. 3,500.00 Total: Fixed Cost Rs. 12,500


II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Labour 2000 b Fertilizer/ Insecticides in pits 2000 c Transportation cost 1000 d Packing 500 e Miscellaneous 2500 Total Variable Cost 8000

Break Even Point = Fixed cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin = 12500/30.5=409.5

Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 30500/8000 = 3.8 ((should be greater than 1) Production System‐III: Raising of Poultry Birds Poultry is one of the fastest growing segments of the agricultural sector in India today. While the production of agricultural crops has been rising at a rate of 1.5 to 2 percent per annum, that of eggs and broilers has been rising at a rate of 8 to 10 percent per annum. As a result, India is now the world's fifth largest egg producer and the eighteenth largest producer of broilers. Driving this expansion are a combination of factors ‐ growth in per capita income, a growing urban population and falling real poultry prices. The poultry sector in India has undergone a paradigm shift in structure and operation. A significant feature of India's poultry industry has been its transformation from a mere backyard activity into a major commercial activity in just about four decades. This transformation has involved sizeable investments in breeding, hatching, rearing and processing. Farmers in India have moved from rearing non‐descript birds to today rearing hybrids such as is Hyaline, lt is Shaver, ll and in Babcock, lt which ensure faster growth, good livability, excellent feed conversion and high profits to the rearers. The industry has grown largely due to the initiative of private enterprise, minimal government intervention, and considerable indigenous poultry genetics capabilities, and considerable support from the complementary veterinary health, poultry feed, poultry equipment, and poultry processing sectors. India is one of the few countries in the world that has put into place a sustained Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) egg production project. Why the term “Home Based Business Opportunity” is the most used term on the Internet today. Because today most people doesn’t want to work for other people anymore, and wanted to have their own home based business instead. Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost

a Construction of poultry shed (10mt*10mt) 1 13000 13000


b Feeder 2 350 700c Drinker 2 200 400e Sub feeders 2 200 400 Total Fixed Cost 14500

1.8 kg body weight * 2.0 F.C.R. (Feed convertion ratio) 3.6 kg feed require for 1.8 kg body wright at 40 ‐ 42 day period * 15 Rs feed. Cost 55/‐ Rs Total Feed Cost Benefit cost ratio (BCR) = Net Benefit/Net cost = 14000/10600 = 1.3 ((should be greater than 1)

II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Purchase of birds 100 25 2500 b Feed purchase 100 55 5500c Transportation during procurement 700 700d Transportation during selling 1000 1000e Vaccination & Medication (Twice in cycle) 400 400 f Electricity charges 500 500 Total Variable Cost 10600

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity 1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) Rs 10600 2 Total Production (Q) Kgs 140 3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 68.5 4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 1 kg 1005 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) (100*140) 140006 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) (100‐68.5) 31.57 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) (14000‐10600) 3400


Production System‐IV Introduction: Jetpurpavi villages of (IWMP‐1) are located in jetpurpavi Taluka Vadodara District of Gujarat state. IWMP‐1 consists of 10 villages and a area around 4353.8 ha is taken into the project as per the priority for treatment. These clusters of village consist of forest area from thin to thick cover. 98% of the population in this area is tribal and hence agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activities are still carried in very traditional manner. There is huge gap between average and actual yield in this area. Hence, Natural resources based livelihood activities are planned by including modern techniques for enhancing productivity this areas. Selected Activity: Dairy Improvement (Jetpupavi‐1) Livelihood improvement through dairying seems to be a promising option in this area as the livestock population is in optimum number for generating good income and forming potential sub‐sector in these villages. Check list:

1. There is huge number of livestock population in this cluster of villages however; the average productivity potential is very low as per the details given in table 1. Hence after a close study it was decided that by suitable intervention and required support, productivity can be maximized in this area, thereby increasing the average income of the stake holder.

Table: 1 S.No Livestock (Cow, buffalo, etc) No. of cattle No. of productive cattle Milk productivity (liters/cattle/day) 1 Buffalo 2360 486 3.5 2 Cow 2230 545 2.5 3 Bullock 2408 275 ‐ 4 Goat 2476 20 0.5 5 Sheep ‐ 3 0 6 Hen 1706 ‐ ‐

i. Increasing the productivity: Due to continuous inbreeding the progeny produced is of same indigenous breed which leads to low milk productivity. However, to counter act this issues a tie‐up with local NGO(JK Trust) and District Milk Union working towards dairy development which provides services such as “Artificial insemination” and animal health care are being linked up to villages of watershed for replacement of indigenous breeds. With the time, improved breeds will ensure the higher productivity of milk in the project area.


ii. Reduce Cost of Production: Cost of production is mainly increased due to fodder and concentrates which are partially available from forest area and farmers own field which is insufficient for entire year. To reduce the cost of production, concentrates along with fodder plots are provided to users group for growing of fodder in their own field which will be sufficient for whole year.

iii. Price realization will be improved by setting up milk collection cum milk grading centre for remuneration as per the fat percentage of milk. Grading centre equipment – 1Computer, 1 Dot‐ Matrix printer, Centrifugal machine for fat testing.

iv. Reducing production Risk: Continuous support for breeding from NGO (JK trust) and District Milk Union/Govt bodies for Artificial Insemination will ensure improved breeds. Feeding risk is being covered by providing fodder plots and concentrates to the user groups ensuring fodder security. Health risk is covered by regular animal health camps‐ de‐worming and preventive health care is provided. Production risk is minimized by above intervention and marketing risk is minimized by linking to District milk collection center. In all the cases agreements are being made between the primary producers and procuring agency.

V. Peoples Institutions Primary level co‐operatives/ Users groups are formed at village level for carrying these activities in collective manner.

Vi. Capacity building requirements Training of farmer/Individual creating awareness regarding preventive health care and animal management through various institutes like KVK, Animal husbandry department and sadguru foundation.

Vii Credit Linkage: Credit linkages with Bank and Gujarat State Tribal Development Corporation through TASP.

Viii Convergence with other programmes: Convergence with District Milk Union, JK trust Program, Animal husbandry department for required technical support and Agriculture department for latest fodder varieties.

S.N. Fodder Name Variety Seed Rate (Kg/Ha.) Torduction (Qtl/Ha.) 1 Jowar S‐1049(Sundhiya), C‐10.2(Chasatiyo), GFS‐3/4/5 For Improved 60 & For Hybrid 30 350‐400

2 Maize Africal Tall, Ganga Safed‐2, Ganga‐5, Vikram

Farm Sameri, GM‐1/2/360 In Monsoon 300‐400, In Winter &

Summer 400‐500

3 Gajraj Grass NB‐21, CO‐1, APBN‐1 27777, 12345, 10000 Cuttings First Year: 1500‐2000, Second Year:

1500, Third Year: 1000

4 Anjan/Dhaman

Grass IGFRI‐1, Pusailo Anjan, Co‐1 2 to 3 In Gauchar 150‐200, In case of Irrigated

400‐500


IX Natural Resource Requirement:

Particulars Private Panchayat Government

Land Private Water Private Biomass Private Forest X. Total Beneficiaries under dairy development program.

Sr No. Village Marginal and small Farmer

Total %of marginal Farmers

Fodder Plots Health Camps 1 Amabazati 3 75 78 11.6 2 Bhindol 8 75 83 7.2 3 Bandli 5 75 80 13.1 4 Bortha 2 75 77 5.5 5 Degla 2 80 82 17.86 Naniamrol 10 75 85 13.87 Karsan 20 75 95 4.88 Rajpur(k) 10 90 100 8.59 Saloj 15 75 90 6.910 Zab(Sajva) 15 75 90 7.4

Total 90 770 860 9.7On an average 9.7 % marginal and small farmers will be covered of the total cluster. *Note: Beneficiaries % is calculated against total demographic population of each village.


Production System – V Project title: Cultivation of alovera plants in 1 acre of land as part of production system in selected villages. This idea is mainly borrowed from Van Bandhu Kalyan Yojana of Chief Minister’s Ten Point Programme. Objectives: The major objective of the above project is as under.

1. To identify the lands of Tribal/B.P.L Farmer. 2. To prepare a site map of individual plots. 3. To generate and interest among the local population to cultivate herbs of medicinal important in those fileds. 4. To extend necessary technical‐know how for growing medicinal herbs in a cost effective manners. 5. To find out the suitable buyers for the produce and act as a liaison body between the seller and the buyer, protecting interest of the seller. Criteria for Crop demonstration in production systems: a. Owned land minimum 1 acre. b. Irrigation facility in summer c. Farmer should be progressive and willingness to adapt new technology. d. Self motivated and interested in the field activity. Methodology Each of the individual plots will be assigned a particular WDT agriculture member agro climatic condition of each plot will be recorded and necessary measures will be taken to maintain the optimum level of soil condition suitable for the growth of the herbs. Technical assistance from the expert will be taken to choose the plant species to be grown inn a particular field depending upon the agro climatic condition of that particular field. Arrangement for the supply of seeds/saplings etc will be made and all effort will be made to keep the herbs free from infection. After harvest herbs will be sold at the prevailing market price and hers benefits will be passed on to cultivators. The most important aspect of this project will be that for the growth of the plants no chemical fertilizer will be used rather plants will be grown under the strict principle of “ORGANIC FARMING” so as maintain the best quality of the crude drugs. NOTE: This project is purely based on backward and forward linkages for procurement of raw material till selling and all other technical guidance will be provided through the Navjeevan Trust. This trust is having M.O.U with Nutan Ayurvedic Research Center for purchase all Aloe Vera plants cultivated by trust in Gujarat. (A) COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS: For one acre of land one type of crop with probable variation of 10 % when The crop is changed. S.no Particulars for one year of cultivation Cost in Rs. 1 Preparation of Land (Ploughing, weeding composting etc.) 10000 2 Seeds/sapling of alovara plants and related. 17500


3 Misc 1000 4 Water 1500 5 Consultation Fee 2500 6 Transportation Expenses 5000 7 Total (Per acre per crop) 37500

(B) PROFIT : (Calculated for one crop per acre) S.no Particulars In Rs.

1 5000 baby plants planted in a acre of land will produce about 20,000 sapling. Each sapling will be sell @ Rs. 1 so the net profit from the sell sapling will be

20000

2 Fully mature plants will be purchased @ Rs. 1/kg. Estimated biomass of Aloe Vera in a acre of land will be 15 kg ( individual wt) X 5000

75000

3 Gross profit 95000 4 Net profit (A‐B) 57500

*Note: Good treatment can give one plant weight up to 35 to 40 kgs. Production System: VI Mahua (doli) processing centre: Madhuca longifolia, commonly known as mahwa or mahua, is an Indian tropical tree found largely in the central and north Indian plains and forests. It is a fast‐growing tree that grows to approximately 20 meters in height, possesses evergreen or semi‐evergreen foliage, and belongs to the family Sapotaceae. It is cultivated in warm and humid regions for its oleaginous seeds (producing between 20 and 200 kg of seeds annually per tree, depending on maturity), flowers and wood. The fat (solid at ambient temperature) is used for the care of the skin, to manufacture soap or detergents, and as a vegetable butter. It can also be used as a fuel oil. The seed cakes obtained after extraction of oil constitute very good fertilizer. It is considered holy by many tribal communities because of its usefulness. Sr. No. Cost Head Unit Unit cost Total

I Fixed Cost a Mahuda oil extraction machine 1 60,000 60,000 b Machine motor 1 25,000 25,000 c Three phase light connection 25,000 Total: Fixed Cost 1,10,000 II Variable Cost (One production cycle) a Light bill 4 month 10000


b Oil expenditure 4 month 2500 c Miscellaneous 2,500 Total Variable Cost 15,000

Sr. No. Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 4 month 15,000

2 Total Production (Q) 4 month 40,000 Kg

3 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 2.6 rs/kg

4 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 5 Rs./Kg

5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) Rs 20,0000

6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 2.4

7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 185000 • Break Even Point= 45833.3Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin • Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 185000/125000= 1.4

– should be greater than 1 Production System VII : Net House Famring: Net Houses cultivation has been experiencing accelerated growth in recent years. Because of the substantial financial investment involved in the building and maintenance of Net Houses’, they are largely used for high added value crops. Net Houses development is particularly suited to the small family farm where there are constraints on available land and water. An average of 300 tons of tomatoes is grown per hectare per season, four times that harvested in open fields. In addition, plastic Net Houses structures have recently come into use for housing livestock, mainly chicken and fish.Net houses are mainly used for growing flowers, vegetables, ornamental plants and spices. Recently experiments have been conducted to investigate the feasibility of Net Houses‐grown fruit trees such as nectarines, peaches, loquats, grapes and bananas for commercial purposes, mainly for export. In our project villages there is vast potential for growing horticulture and floriculture crops which have high commercial value and profit margins are equally with short term returns on investments.


A model of capsicum farming in net house is designed in small area to reap the benefits to the best from improvised farming techniques. S.no Cost Head Unit Unit Quanity Unit cost Total I Fixed Cost i Civil Works Excavation for net‐house coloumn (1:2:4) ordinary Cement Concrere

of curing etc. Size: 9''*9''*1'‐6'' No. 17 225.00 3825.00

ii STRUCTURE WORK 0 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 32 mm Rmt. 102 225.00 22950.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 25 mm Rmt. 54 168.00 9072.00 G.I.ISI ''B'' CLASS PIPE 20 mm Rmt. 30 118.00 3540.00 90 % Shade Agro net Sq. Mt. 300 32.00 9600.00 Ropes Rmt. 200 2.50 500.00 iii Fitting Charges L/S 1 6849.3 6849.30 Misting System for net house without Ele. motor Nos. ‐ ‐ 0 Plumbing Materials for connecting motor to irrigation system Nos. ‐ ‐ 0 iv Taxes @ 5% L/S 1 2816.82 2816.82 Total 59153.12 II Variable Cost (One production cycle) Units Unit cost Totala Seedlings 400.No 5 2000b Land preparation 108.Sqmt 200c Feritlizer & Pesticide 2000d Packing Material 500e Transportation 2500 Total Variable Cost 7200Sr. No.

Heads Unit Amount / Quantity

1 Total Variable Cost (TVC) 72002 Total Production (Q) kgs 10803 Average Variable Cost : AVC= (TVC/Q) 6.64 Average Revenue (AR=Price) 25


5 Total Revenue: Total Market Value of the produce (P*Q) 27000 6 Unit Margin (P‐AVC) 18.4 7 Net profit per cycle (TR‐TVC) 19800

Break Even Point= Total Fixed Cost (or, Investment) / Unit Margin =59153/18.4=3214.8 Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)= Net Benefit / Net Cost = 19800/7200= 2.75 4.4. Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects. Scope of capacity building at ProjectVillage (Jetpurpavi 1‐G)

• Alternative Land Use Plan • Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation • Improved and Scientific agriculture practices • Fodder development and Management • Afforestation • Organic Farming • Meteorological Information • Dairy Development and Management • Income Generation Activities

o Stiching Machines o Making leaf plates o Flour Mills o Centering material o Tent House o Vermicomposting


Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: S.No Organisation Training Modules

1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Vadodara Training in modern and scientific agriculture practices

2 Anand agriculture University, Training in modern and better agriculture practices

3 Sadguru Foundation, Dahod Community Mobilization, Geology and Engg structures details 4 BAIF foundation vadodara SMC works, Livelihood activities and Animal Husbandry development Programmes, SHG and federation

level training and accounting 5 ITI Jambugoda, Microenterprise development activities 6 District industrial center, Mechanical training and support training to stakeholders7 Forest research center, vadodara Afforestation and Vermicomposting and agro forestry

8 SPIPA, Ahmedabad Participatory approach and Engineering aspects in watershed

9 BISAG Space application and Different maps preparation Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

S. No. Project Name Project

Stakeholders Total no. of persons

No. of persons to be

trained

No. of training programmes

Estimated cost(in lakh)

1 Jetpurpavi‐1 G

PIA 5 5 415.673

*(3% of total capacity building fund)

WDTs 6 6 12 UGs 104 30 8 SHGs 124 14 8WCs 70 20 8

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: S. No.

Particulars Number/Year Cost per unit Executing agency Estimated

expenditure (Rs.) Outcomes

1 Street play 20 4500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 90000 Awareness for the importance of watershed

project

2 Campaigning for community mobilisation 4 2500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 10000 3 Pamphlets and posters 20000 3 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 60000 4 Banners, Hoardings 20 600 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 120005 Wall Painting at 3 community places 20 2500 PIA and DWDU, Vadodara 50000


CHAPTER – 5 BUDGETING


Budgeting The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds. Table no. 47: Budget at a glance

AmbazatiBudget Component Cost requirement( Rs. in lakhs)

Net Project Cost 522.40 ‐Administrative Costs 52.24‐Monitoring 5.22 ‐Evaluation 5.22Preparatory phase: ‐Entry point activities 20.89 ‐Institution and capacity building 26.12‐Detailed Project Report (DPR) 5.22Watershed Works Phase: ‐Watershed Development works, 261.22‐Livelihood activities for the asset less persons, 52,24 ‐Production system and micro enterprises 67.91 Consolidation Phase 26.12 Total 522.40 Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP

Sl no

Village

Activity

EPA Institution and CB

DPR Watershed development

Work

Livelihood for asset less

Production system and

MicroenterprisesConsolidation Total

1 Ambazati 85536 106920 21384 1069200 213840 277992 106920 1881792 2 Bhindol 179616 224520 44904 2245200 449040 583752 224520 39515523 Bandi 236496 295620 59124 2956200 591240 768612 295620 52029124 Bordha 93264 116580 23316 1165800 233160 303108 116580 20518085 Degla 472368 590460 118092 5904600 1180920 1535196 590460 10392096


6 Nani Amrol 145920 182400 36480 1824000 364800 474240 182400 3210240 7 Karsan 258672 323340 64668 3233400 646680 840684 323340 5690784 8 Rajpur(k) 202080 252600 50520 2526000 505200 656760 252600 4445760 9 Saloj 185040 231300 46260 2313000 462600 601380 231300 407088010 Zab(S) 230832 288540 57708 2885400 577080 750204 288540 5078304 2089824 2612280 522456 26122800 5224560 6791928 2612280 45976128Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under

IWMP Gap in funds requirement

1 Ambazati (28.324) 21.384 (6.94) 2 Bhindol 51.594 44.904 6.690 3 Bandi 71.554 59.124 9.93 4 Bordha 42.006 23.316 15.195 Degla 128.662 118.092 10.576 Nani Amrol 42.08 36.48 5.67 Karsan 72.708 64.668 8.04 8 Rajpur(k) 60.88 50.52 10.369 Saloj 68.14 46.26 21.88 10 Zab(S) 73.058 57.708 15.35 Total 652.666 522.456 130.21

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No. Village Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to convergence

(Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence was

taken

1

Ambazati

Checkdam 1.84 MGNREGS Project Level Earthen Bunds 1.34 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Ponds 0.42 MGNREGS Project LevelFarm Bund 3.340 MGNREGS Project Level

Total 6.94


2

Bhindol

Earthen Bunds 1.34 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Ponds 0.9 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 4.45 MGNREGS Project Level

Total 6.69

3

Bandi

Earthen Bunds 2.67 MGNREGS Project Level Village Ponds 1.25 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 4.45 MGNREGS District level Farm Pond 0.56 MGNREGS

Total 8.93

4

Bordha

Village Pond 1.45 MGNREGS Project Level Check dam 3.06 MGNREGS Project Level Earthen Bunds 4 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Ponds 1.12 MGNREGS District level Farm Bunds 5.56 MGNREGS District Level

Total 15.19

5

Degla

Earthen Bunds 2.67 MGNREGS Project LevelFarm Ponds 0.84 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 5.56 MGNREGS Project Level Nursery 1.5 MGNREGS District level

Total 10.57

6

Nani Amrol

Checkdam 1.2 MGNREGS Project Level Earthen Bunds 1.34 MGNREGS Project LevelFarm Ponds 0.84 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 2.22 MGNREGS District level

5.6

7

Karsan

Earthen Bunds 4 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Ponds 0.7 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 3.34 MGNREGS Project Level

Total 8.04


8

Rajpur (K)

Checkdam 1.65 MGNREGS Repair Project Level Earthen Bunds 1.34 MGNREGS Project LevelFarm Ponds 0.7 MGNREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 6.67 MGNREGS District level

Total 10.36

9

Saloj

Checkdam 0.8 NREGS, Forest Repair Project LevelEarthen Bunds 1.34 NREGS, Forest Project Level Farm Ponds 0.56 NREGS Project Level Farm Bunds 7.78 NREGS District level Nursery 3 NREGS, Forest District Level Drinking Water 8.4 Wassmo District Level

Total 21.88

10

Zab(Sajva)

Checkdam 1.1 NREGS, Forest Repair Project Level Earthen Bunds 2.67 NREGS, Forest Project Level Farm Ponds 0.84 NREGS Project LevelFarm Bunds 3.34 NREGS District level Drinking Water 7.4 Mechanical Eng Dept District Level

Total 15.35


CHAPTER ‐ 6 EXPECTED OUTCOMES


Expected Outcomes Employment One of the prominent features of watershed program is to create self sustainace to stake holder in terms of livelihood and increase in employment opprutunities is one of the benchmark that can unravel the effect of watershed. Watershed creates employment oppurtunites during the work phase for labour intensive activities like construction of gully plug, earthen dam, Farm bund, check dam, check wall and through the assest created under watershed program have a direct impact on agiculuture and natural resource development. Livelihood for self employed, wage lobour and income generating activities where there is a ample scope for employment. As the net employement increases the percapita income of agriculture, animal husbandry and other allied activites are also sure to increase. Table no. 52: Employment in Project area

S. No.

Names of the villages

Wage employment Self employment No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Ambazati 7544 0 7522 3809 18875 705 0 703 356 1764 353 0 352 178 882 2 Bhindol 6559 0 6527 3167 16253 613 0 610 296 1519 307 0 305 148 760 3 Bandi 13771 674 3146 6762 24353 1287 63 294 632 2276 644 32 147 316 1138 4 Bordha 7297 64 2868 9898 20127 682 6 268 925 1881 341 3 134 463 941 5 Degla 7822 0 7768 3820 19410 731 0 726 357 1814 366 0 363 179 907 6 Nani Amrol 20983 182 19421 10358 50944 1961 17 1815 968 4761 981 9 908 484 2381 7 Karsan 13931 0 13846 6795 34572 1302 0 1294 635 3231 651 0 647 318 1616 8 Rajpur 12722 0 12722 6463 31907 1189 0 1189 604 2982 595 0 595 302 1491 9 Saloj 13257 0 13193 6431 32881 1239 0 1233 601 3073 620 0 617 301 1537 10 Zab 16874 556 16318 8089 41837 1577 52 1525 756 3910 789 26 763 378 1955 Total 120760 1476 103331 65592 291159 11286 138 9657 6130 27211 5647 70 4831 3067 13608

Migration Main reason for migration is in search of employment oppurtunities for generating income for oneself and family. These clusters of villages have employment oppurtunities only during kharif season and which leaves them unemployed for both rabi and summer season. Implementation of watershed activities in these villages will open new avenues for employment in both kharif and Rabi seasons. Water stored in the water harvesting structures will be utilized in the offseason for agriculture purpose and also new technologies like drip irrigation, crop demonstration, animal camps, and farmers meeting for improved crop production practices will alter the farming pattern and create huge employment oppurtunites


in the rural areas. Water stored through the structures will give opportunity for cultivation of farm lands which were left barren past years. Hence the overall impact is there will be decrease in the rate of migration. Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre‐project Expected post project Pre‐project Expected post project1 Ambazati 52 20 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 2 Bhindol 75 30 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 3 Bandi 5 1 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 4 Bordha 105 63 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 5 Degla 70 42 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 6 Nani Amrol 55 22 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 7 Karsan 40 16 6‐ 3 Months 3Months 8 Rajpur 35 14 6‐ 3 Months 3Months9 Saloj 45 18 6‐ 3 Months 3Months10 Zab 70 28 6‐ 3 Months 3Months

Ground water table: The ground water table of this cluster of villages is appromately 15mt and futher goes down in summer and drought seasons. The single biggest source of groundwater depletion and lowering of the water table is over‐pumping and unchecked ground water utilization. Due to growing population the demand for water for daily acitivies and agriculute has increased. This posses a major pressure on the water table. The water travels slowly through layers of soil and rock before finally reaching the water table. Several water harvesting structure are created like percolation tanks, roof water harvesting structures, bore well and dug well recharge for recharge of ground water. Hence a strong effort is taken to maintain a balance between usage and recharging of the ground water. Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre‐Project level (Current water

table depth) Expected Increase/decrease

(Post‐ Project)

1 Ambazati Open wells 15mt. 10 mt. Bore wells NA ‐

Others (specify) ‐ ‐

2 Bhindol Open wells 15 mt. 10 mt Bore wells NA ‐



3 Bandi Open wells 17 mt. 11 mt Bore wells NA ‐


4 Bordha Open wells 14 mt. 9 mtBore wells NA ‐


S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre‐Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post‐ Project)

5 Degla Open wells 15 mt. 10 mt Bore wells NA ‐


6 Nani Amrol Open wells 15mt. 10 mt Bore wells 20mt. 12 mt


7 Karsan Open wells 14 mt. 9 mt Bore wells NA ‐


8 Rajpur(K) Open wells 14mt 9 mt Bore wells NA ‐


9 Saloj Open wells 15 mt. 10 mtBore wells NA ‐


10 Zab(S) Open wells 15 mt. 10 mtBore wells NA ‐

Others (specify) ‐ ‐Drinking water Drinking water is major problem in these villages. People depend upon hand pump and open well for drinking water and travel at 50 ft distance on average to fetch the water. There is no much problem of inherent or ingress salanity in this area. Drinking water is only available for 8 months and only few well in this village are live. The demand for drinking water changes from season to season gets worse in summer. However through intregration of


watershed program with other schemes like WASSMO and Mechnical wing for water supply department Vadodara, has been done under the convergence. Drinkin water problem is likely to slove by this initiative. Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No.

Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year)

Quality of drinking water Comments

Pre‐project Expected Post project Pre‐project Expected Post‐project1 Ambazati 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable2 Bhindol 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable3 Bandi 8 Months 11 Months Potable Portable4 Bordha 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable5 Degla 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable6 Nani Amrol 8 Months 11 Months Portable Portable7 Karsan 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable 8 Rajpur 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable 9 Saloj 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable 10 Zab 8 Months 11 Months Slightly saline Portable

Crops Table no. 56: Details of crop area and yield in the project area Agriculture is being one the most important component and main occupation of the people living in these rural areas. Crop production and agiculture itself is constraint due to lack of irrigation facilities and total dependence of rain has limited the scope for agriculture. Only kharif season crops are taken in one year. However structures created under watershed opens avenue to take up cropping in rabi season by utilizing the water stored through check dam, check wall, farm ponds. Feilds bunds are also created to check the run‐off and to promote percolation of rain water.

Name of village Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl)

Ambazati

Kharif (Maize) 56.6 9.9 67.92 11.99 Tur 36. 2.85 43.2 3.414

Cotton 31.3 4.04 37.56 4.848 Rabi Maize Zaid

Village total 123.9 16.79 148.68 10.252


Project total

Bhindol

Kharif Maize 74 13.05 88.8 15.56 Tur 37.72 4.51 45.26 5.41

Cotton 98.2 5.29 117.84 6.348Rabi Maize

Zaid Village total 517.25 38.25 251.9 27.318

Project total

Bandi

Kharif Maize 83.82 6.46 100.58 7.752 Tur 72 6.70 86.4 8.04

Paddy Rabi (Maize)


Project total

Bordha

Kharif Maize 323.1 13.01 387.1 15.612 Tur 196.2 8.50 235.4 10.2

Cotton 94 14.50 112.8 17.40Paddy 20.6 11.24 24.72 13.48

Rabi (Maize) Zaid

Village total 633.9 47.34 760.02 56.692

Project total

Degla

Kharif Maize 48.4 12.02 58.08 14.42 Tur 17.2 8.89 20.64 10.668

Cotton 15 12.82 18 15.38


Paddy 15.2 11.59 18.24 13.90 Rabi(Maize)


Project total

Name of village Name of crops Pre‐project Expected Post‐project

Area (ha) Average Yield (Qtl) per ha. Area (ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl)

Nani Amrol

Kharif Maize 35.32 10.50 42.38 12.6Tur 3.8 9.90 4.56 11.88

Cotton 16.8 14.81 20.16 15.81 Rabi(Maize) 4.5 16.78 5.4 18


Project total

Karsan

Kharif Mazie 4.5 16.78 5.4 17.97 Paddy 57.18 2.58 68.60 13.44 cotton 80.26 10.47 96.31

Rabi(Maize) 18Zaid

Village total 141.94 29.83 170.31 49.41Project total

Rajpur

Kharif Maize 148 9.99 177.6 19.08Tur 10.72 4.81 12.86 14.53

Cotton 26.36 6.54 31.63 15.72 Paddy ‐ ‐ 14.14

Rabi(Maize) 18 Zaid


Village total 185.08 21.34 222.09 81.47 Project total

Saloj

Kharif Maize 17.28 4.93 20.73 16.56Tur 30.56 6.81 36.67 13.32

Cotton 56.04 10.54 67.24 15.96Paddy

Rabi(Maize) 18 Zaid

Village total 124.64 63.84 Project total

Zab

Kharif Mazie 40.1 5.53 48.12 15.33 Tur 25.1 4.51 30.12 118.2

cotton 15.04 4.53 18.04 paddy

Rabi(Maize) 18 Zaid

Village total 95.44 26.16 96.28 151.53 *Note the present data is taken based upon base‐line survey. The above yield is increased by certain percentage keeping in view the assumption that after the intervention of watershed production and net area under agriculture will increase. Although the actual condition is subject to change based upon rainfall and climatic condition of that current year. Horticulture Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be

covered through IWMP (ha) 1 Ambazati 0 .76 2 Bhindol 0 2.143 Bandi 0 .114 Bordha 0 4.06


5 Degla 0 3.01 6 Nani Amrol 0 2.09 7 Karsan 0 2.06 8 Rajpur 0 5.169 Saloj 0 1.0110 Zab 0 6.02

Vegetative cover There is negligible area under tree cover. The village has a forest area of 524ha which consists of only Juliflora Prosopis (ganda babool). Trees like Neem and _Alianthus_are seen just here and there, not concentrated in any area. It is planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation. Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed (ha)1 Ambazati 0.00 3 2 Bhindol 34.20 8 3 Bandi 357.37 2 4 Bordha 897.36 15 5 Degla 1264.84 11 6 Nani Amrol 110.20 8 7 Karsan 139.70 8 8 Rajpur 58.06 19 9 Saloj 0.00 410 Zab 0.00 22

Livestock The village has quite a good of livestock population. These include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats, sheep and camels. The interventions like provision of good quality cows and buffaloes, the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them. Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village

Type of Animal Pre‐Project Expected Post‐project

Remarks No. Yield Income No. Yield Income

1 Jetpurpavi‐1G

IWMP‐1 Milch‐animals

Cow(per animal/day) 2230 1.25 20 2676 2.50 26


Buffalo(per animal/day) 2360 2 26 2832 5 30 Draught Purpose animals 2408

Goat (Meat: Rs/kg) 2476 12‐15 130 2971 13‐15 180 Sheep (Meat: Rs/kg)) 0

Linkages The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. Table no. 60: Backward‐Forward linkages S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre‐project (no.) During the project (no.) Post‐project (no.)

1 Jetpurpavi‐

1G

Backward linkages Seed certification Seed supply system 1 1 Fertilizer supply systemPesticide supply systemCredit institutions ‐ Bank‐1 Bank‐2Water supply WASSMO WASSMOExtension services KVK KVKNurseries Tools/machinery suppliers ‐Price Support systemLabour Any other (Baby corn) Contract Farming Buy back system Forward linkages Harvesting/threshing machinery Storage (including cold storage) Road network Transport facilities Markets / Mandis Agro and other Industries 1Milk and other collection centres Milk collection centre‐1 4Labour


Any other (please specify) Fodder bank‐1 3 Vermi‐compost unit‐1 3

Logical Framework Analysis PROJECT STRUCTURE EXPECTED RESULT PERFORMANCE VARIABLE

INDICATOR MEANS OF VERIFICATION RISK/ ASSUMPTIONS

GOAL: IMPACT: To conserve the soil and moisture and enhance the income of the people of the project area through watershed activities

* The income of families will increased

*Purchase power of villagers will increase

* Impact assessment study

* Living standard will improve

* Annual expenditure and saving of households.

* Evaluation report Natural disaster (Drought)

* Household assests * Compare between baseline survey and evaluation report

Political Intervention

Increase of ground water table

* Number of people migrating for employment opportunity

* Physical observation

* Irrigation during off‐season

* Cropping pattern * Physical Varification and FGD with farmers

OBJECTIVE‐1: OUTCOMES: To minimize the degradation of land and to conserve the natural resources of the project and area.

* Agriculture income will increase

*Net area under agriculture will increases.


* Total agriculture production will increase

* Evaluation report

Soil moisture content will increase

* Presence of vegetation cover in the project area.

* Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

Maintenance of the Structure after the project completion


* Percentage of farmers cultivating the crops in Rabi.

* Trend analysis of crop cultivation

Activity for Objective‐1: Outputs: 1. Soil and moisture conservation works

* Completion of soil moisture works.

* Number of watershed physical structure presents in the project area

* Physical verification

*Diversified farming * Discussion with Villagers/Farmers

2. Use of advance water conservation techniques.

* Optimum utilization of available available water

* Number of households having drip irrigation system of their houses

* Physical verification

3. Modern agriculture techniques for enhancing of agriculture productivity through crop demonstration plot.

*Change in the cultivation pattern and adoption of new techniques in agriculture to realize the maximum potential of the land


* Observations

OBJECTIVE‐2: OUTCOMES To increase the per capita income of BPL and marginal farmer through various livelihood activities.

* Reduction of migrating families from the project area.



* Availbility of employment within the project area.

* Number of people engaged in poultry farming and other livelihood activities.

* Physical verification/ Photographs

* Unemployment will decrease

* Number of people involved in self employment activities

* FGDs and PRA

Activity for Objective‐2: Outputs:


1. Promotion of livelihood activities like dairy unit,vermicompost, nursery raising, fodder production, garment stiching and flour mill.

* People will set‐up their micro‐enterprise on demand based activties.

* Number of people showing their interest to set‐up micro industry

* Observations

2. Capacity building activities for improvement entrepreneurial skill.

* Improved knowledge and enhancement of skills for self development

* Number of small enterprise set‐up


OBJECTIVE‐3: OUTCOMES: To strengthen the local institution

* Presence of strong and dynamic local governance

* Number of meetings initiated by the local leaders.

* Impact assessment study * Interest of the People.

* People participation and representation will increase

* Number of peoples’ organization present in the grass root level

* Evaluation report, FGD, Observations

Activity for Objective‐3: Outputs: 1. Organise training and awareness programme for Village institutions

* Quality of local leaders will improve and use of more democratic method of decision making.

* Number of case resolved within the locality.

* Observations

2.Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee

* Local leaders will take interest to understand the programmes and schemes and utilize for the benefit of the village.

* Number of schemes utilize for the benefit of the villages.

* FGDs and PRA

3. Formation of peoples organization in the grass root level

* There will be proper management of available resources by the people's organisation

* Activities of the watershed is implementing smoothly without any hindrance


* There will be proper implementation of the projects

* Participation of deprived section will increase

* Number of deprived/ poor people participated in the meeting of Gram Sabha

* Representation of local people will increase

* Number of participants represent in the project meeting.


CHAPTER ‐7 QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES


Introduction: Chapter‐7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP‐1 Project of Vadodara maintain the quality and renders the project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the improper implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post‐project techniques for project sustainability and research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the area development. 7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:

To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training, human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring. Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned –

1. First Tire (Monitoring of activities): This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all activities as per the action plan. The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity.

2. Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs): To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per the logical frame work. The indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement at the time of implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months.

3. Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes): Project reviewing committee along with the project co‐ordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The outcomes level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of output level indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities. The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of the

monitoring system is presented in the table as under. Table no 60. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project IWMP‐1 Tiers of Monitoring Basis of monitoring Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the Indicator Monitoring by

First tier Immediate result basis Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organizations

Second Tier Monitoring of Outputs Regular monitoring (Quarterly,

half yearly and annually )Objective oriented

Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts and PM)


Third Tier Monitoring of Outcomes

Annually but monitoring start from second year onwards?

Goal Oriented

1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU,

2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA

Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web‐based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land‐use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village‐wise. Furthermore, survey‐number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web‐based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher‐up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude‐longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher‐up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. Evaluation: The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external agency should use the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because these are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at the time of the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project. 7.2 Plans for Post‐Project Management/Sustainability Approach: Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community participation and institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under: 7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a buffer between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat.


An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP‐1 project of Vadodara. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep‐rooted plants, fast and slow growing plants, productive and medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil moisture optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole. Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is the key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater. It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship. 7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management

During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and post project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help in achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and natural resource management. Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behaviour and its economic / ecological implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community. 7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management

A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources. This usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In‐built system and mechanisms will be developed for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non Government institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and Users Groups. Watershed level Committee Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community – landholders and landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non political organizations. User Groups The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning, functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities.


ACTION PLAN MAPS

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency...

Documents

Transcript of Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency...