Guilt by Association Edgetics

3
Guo et al. hereby find truncating mutations not guilty. Protein-network-based approaches for identifying candidate genes and prediction of mutation pathogenicity often hinge on the idea that mutations within genes encoding components of a given pathway should result in the same phenotype. Goh et al. and Feldman et al. found that protein products of genes associated with similar diseases are more likely to physically interact and form disease- specific functional modules. On the basis of this commonly accepted ‘‘guilt-by-association’’ principle… methods have not considered the potential differences in the molecular mechanisms leading to the corresponding disorders for mutations of different inheritance modes and molecular types. Zhong et al. found that disease mutations could lead to two types of perturbations at the network level: node removal (loss of all known interactions of a protein) or edgetic perturbation (loss of specific interactions of a protein). They also found that a higher fraction of mutations associated with autosomal-

description

Essay (or something) on guilt by association and edgetics because Scribd is making me upload something :-/

Transcript of Guilt by Association Edgetics

  • Guo et al. hereby findtruncating mutations not guilty.Protein-network-based approaches for identifying candidate genes and prediction of mutation pathogenicity often hinge on the idea that mutations withingenes encoding components of a given pathway should result in the same phenotype.

    Goh et al. and Feldman et al. found that protein products of genes associated with similar diseases are more likely to physically interact and form disease-specific functional modules. On the basis of this commonly accepted guilt-by-association principle methods have not considered the potential differencesin the molecular mechanisms leading to the corresponding disorders for mutations of different inheritance modes and molecular types.

    Zhong et al. found that disease mutations could lead to two types of perturbations at the network level: node removal (loss of all known interactions of aprotein) or edgetic perturbation (loss of specific interactions of a protein). They also found that a higher fraction of mutations associated with autosomal-

    http://www.pnas.org/content/104/21/8685.full.pdfhttp://www.pnas.org/content/105/11/4323.full.pdfhttp://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v5/n1/pdf/msb200980.pdf
  • dominant diseases are in-frame, tend to affect structural proteins, and are likely to affect exposed residues.

    Zhong : Solid lines between two nodes represent preserved interactions and dashed lines represent perturbed interactions. Edges are generally biophysical interactions, but could also be biochemical.

    Evaluating over 20,000 cancer-associated mutations to determine whether dominant and recessive mutations are enriched in regions encoding proteininteraction interfaces they found that recessive mutations (not dominant point mutations) are likely to be found in regions encoding interaction interfaces.

    Furthermore, dominant truncating mutations are enriched in regions encoding areas between interfaces, suggesting that these mutant genes might encodefunctional protein fragments that retain some, but not all, protein interactions.

    This finding is particularly jarring as truncating, also referred to as loss-of-function (LoF), mutations are often regarded as knockout mutations in large-scalemutational screens and genome-sequencing.

    However, there are instances reported where mRNAs harboring truncating mutations escape NMD and are translated into proteins with dominant-negative activities. One particularly interesting case study involving SOX10 demonstrated that truncating mutations in different regions of SOX10 confer distinct neurological phenotypes. Among all SOX10 alleles harboring nonsense or frameshift mutations, transcripts with mutations in exons 3 and 4 are targeted by NMD, causing a neurological phenotype called Waardenburg-Shah syndrome.

    On the other hand, transcripts with mutations in exon 5 escape NMD and lead to a more severe phenotype as a result of the dominantnegative effects of the translated protein. Furthermore, a recent publication revealed that, contrary to common belief, only a small percentage (16.3%) of LoF alleles show significant evidence of NMD. Our results further suggest that it is overly simplistic to consider all truncating mutations as null mutations, given that a significant fraction of them do generate functional protein products.

    Interestingly, our results show that truncating mutations that lead to functional products are not limited to the extreme C-terminal region of proteins; many proteins can lose more than two-thirds of their length and still retain specific functions.

    Guo et al., Dissecting Disease Inheritance Modes in a Three-Dimensional Protein Network Challenges the Guilt-by-Association Principle . American Journal of HumanGenetics, vol 93, pp. 7889 (2013)

    http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v5/n1/pdf/msb200980.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonsense_mediated_decayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOX10http://nature.com/http://www.sciencemag.org/content/335/6070/823.full.pdfhttp://ac.els-cdn.com/S0002929713002358/1-s2.0-S0002929713002358-main.pdf?_tid=7ab77216-ec6a-11e2-9f27-00000aab0f6c&acdnat=1373795464_fd9c52e2e2df1544ea830783c3660f6c
  • See also: Gillis and Pavlidis, Guilt by Association Is the Exception Rather Than the Rule in Gene Networks. PLOS Computational Biology, vol 8, e1002444 (2012)

    Multifunctionality, rather than association, is a primary driver of gene function prediction. Knowledge of the degree of multifunctionality alone can produce astonishingly strong performance when used as a predictor of gene function.

    Multifunctionality is encoded in gene interaction data (such as protein interactions and coexpression networks) and this can feed forward into gene function prediction algorithms.

    http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1002444