Guillem Anglada-Escude (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

42

description

The C arnegie A strometric P lanet S earch and the role of ground based astrometry in the pre-Gaia era. Guillem Anglada-Escude (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1) (1)Carnegie Institution for Science (2) Institute for Astrophysics - University of Goettingen. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Guillem Anglada-Escude (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Page 1: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)
Page 2: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

The Carnegie Astrometric Planet Search and the role of ground based astrometry in the pre-Gaia era.

Guillem Anglada-Escude (1,2)Alan P. Boss(1)

Alycia Weinberger (1)Ian Thompson (1)

(1)Carnegie Institution for Science(2) Institute for Astrophysics - University of Goettingen

Page 3: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Astrometry and radial velocity methods

K

Time

RV

a

Page 4: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

3474 km

1’

120 km

1/60

1/60

1’’

2 km

1/1000

2 m

1 mas

2 cm

10 mas1/100

1 mas

A closer look at astrometry…

Page 5: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Astrometric recipes

masMM

dR

mm sun

pc

AU

jup

p *

a

Exo-Jupiter formula

3*M

MdR

mm

as sun

pc

AU

Earth

pma

Exo-Earth formula

G dwarf @ 10 pc

M dwarf @ 10 pc

0.1 mas 1.0 masMan on

the moonBook on

the moon

3 mas0.3 masPaper

width on the moon

Euro width on the moon

Gaia/ESA Ground based

Page 6: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Ground based AstrometryWhy M dwarfs?

Numerous

Faint

Low mass

Poorly characterized

Hosts to habitable planets (that can be

detected)

Page 7: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Alan Boss (PI, DTM/CIW)Alycia Weinberger (DTM/CIW)Ian Thompson (OCIW)Chistoph Brik (OCIW)Greg Burley (OCIW)

2.5m duPont Telescope. Las Campanas Observatory, Chile

Follow-up a sample of 120 M, L and T dwarfs

Carnegie Astrometric planet Search

Page 8: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Carnegie Astrometric planet Search

CAPScam (I band), 2048x2048

Page 9: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Classic local astrometry

Input catalog Extract, centroid and crossmatch the sources

Fit field distortions Shift (2 par)rotation, scale (4 par)Quadratic deformations (6 para)

Obtain a new catalog

Iterate

Page 10: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

CAPS pipeline : ATPa software

If you are interested in testing with your own images, please check http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/anglada/

•Fully coded in Java (run on your computer)

•Graphic User Interface

•One night processing and Astrometric Iterative solution

• Final Data products : catalog, maps of extracted sources, reference stars, motion of each star, etc.

It also has a Manual!

Page 11: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Carnegie Astrometric Planet search : Lots of parallaxes of cool dwarfs

200+ new and updated parallaxes

Page 12: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Carnegie Astrometric Planet Search program so far…

• Astrometric detection needs long time baselines (5-10 yr)

• Overall precision better than 1 mas/epoch.

• Almost 4 years of baseline, Gas giants should be detected soon (if present)

• About 120 M dwarfs

Page 13: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Carnegie Astrometric Planet Search… candidates?

brown dwarfs

gas giant planets

0.25 milliarcsec accuracy, S/N = 4

0.1HZ

0.5 HZ

Page 14: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

GJ 317 GJ 1214VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.83 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 12.0 pcRadius 15% larger??

Lessons learned from individual targets

? ? ?

Page 15: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : VB 10

Black & Scargle 1982

Astrometry2 x offsets 2 x Proper motions 1 x Parallax

HD 125612Fischer et al. 2007

Doppler1xoffset

GJ 317, Anglada-Escude et al. 2012

Page 16: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : VB 10

Pravdo & Shaklan ApJ, 2009

Residual periodograms

Astrometric periodograms

K = 1500 m/sK = 3000 m/s

Anglada-Escude et al. ApJ, 2011

Page 17: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Anglada-Escude et al. ApJ 2011, RV follow-up with MIKE/MagellanBean et al. 2011, RV follow-up with CRIRES/VLT

Lazorenko et al. 2011, Astrometric follow-up

Lessons learned from individual targets : VB 10

49.9 days 270 days

Page 18: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets

GJ 317 GJ 1214VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.83 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 12.0 pcRadius 15% larger??

Astrometric periodograms

(need better understanding of sampling)

Page 19: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

d = 9.6 pcM* = 0.24 Msun

M sin i = 1.85 Mjup

P = 692 days, a = 0.95 AU

masMM

dR

mm

sun

pc

AU

jup

p *

a

Exo-Jupiter formula

0.78 mas

Jonhson, Butler et al. ApJ 2007

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 20: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

d = 14.9 pc0.32 mas M* = 0.42 Msun

M sin i = 1.8 Mjup

P = 692 days a = 0.95 AU

d = 9.6 pca =0.78 mas

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 21: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

𝒗 𝒓 (𝒕 )=𝜸+𝑲 ¿𝑿 (𝒕 )=𝑿𝟎+𝝁𝜶 (𝒕− 𝒕𝟎 )+∆𝜶 (𝒕)−𝝅 𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜶𝑨𝑼

𝒀 (𝒕 )=𝒀 𝟎+𝝁𝜹 (𝒕− 𝒕𝟎 )+∆𝜹 (𝒕 )−𝝅 𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜹𝑨𝑼

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 22: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

𝐿∝𝐸𝑋𝑃 [− 12𝜒2]

Likelihood function

Period

Mas

sLessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 23: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

𝐿∝𝐸𝑋𝑃 [− 12𝜒2]

Likelihood function

Period

Mas

s

Provides optimal sampling in highly dimensional spaces

N = 13

Run a few million steps and you are done!

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 24: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 25: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

First exoplanet “confirmed” with Ground based astrometry!

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 317

Page 26: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets

GJ 317 GJ 1214

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.83 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 12.0 pcRadius 15% larger??

VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Astrometric periodograms

(need better understanding of sampling)

Page 27: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets

GJ 317 GJ 1214VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.83 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 12.0 pcRadius 15% larger??

Combine RV+Astrometry

Astrometric periodograms

(need better understanding of sampling)

Page 28: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 1214

CAPS Astrometry (new)RMS < 1.0 mas

HARPS-TERRA RVs (updated)

30 transit times and updated

Transit observablesSada et al, 2010, Carter et al. 2011, Kundurthy et al., 2011

• K band, low res(new)• 4 Optical bands• 3x2MASS bands• 4xWISE bands (new)

Page 29: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 1214

d

M*

L*

Teff

14.47 (0.14) pc

0.175 (0.009) Ms

3.9 10-3 Ls

3200 K

12.9 (1.0) pc

0.155 Ms

3.3 10-3Ls

2900 K

+12%+13%

+19%+10%

Previous NEW!

Page 30: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 1214

Page 31: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets : GJ 1214

Page 32: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets

GJ 317 GJ 1214VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.83 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 12.0 pcRadius 15% larger??

Combine RV+Astrometry

Astrometric periodograms

(need better understanding of sampling)

Page 33: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Lessons learned from individual targets

GJ 317 GJ 1214VB 10

Astrometric detectionPravdo & Shaklan 2010 ApJ

P=270 daysM ~ 6 Mjup

D = 7 pcGalactic plane

Doppler candidateJohnson et al 2007, ApJ

P=690 daysM sin i ~ 2 Mjup

D = 9.6 pc[Fe/H] = -0.3??

Transit + Doppler planetCharbonneau et al. 2009, Nat

P=1.85 daysM sin i ~ 6 Meartj

D = 14.5 pcEverything is good!

Combine RV+Astrometry

Transits+RV, astrometry

Simultaneous FIT!

Astrometric periodograms

(need better understanding of sampling)

Page 34: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

‘Other’ exoplanet related programs… 10 years before Gaia

Young field M dwarfs (UV and X ray sources) from Shkolnik et al. 2009 ApJ

12 New members to nearby young moving groups (Beta Pictoris 10 Myr, AB Dor 40 Myr)

61 new parallaxes!

Shkonlik, Anglada-Escude, Weinberger, Boss et al. 2011 (to be submitted!)

Based on astrometry obtained with ATPa (just accepted for publication, ApJ)

J. O’Faherty PhD. Thesis

Page 35: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Early L brown dwarf at 12 pc

Page 36: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Early L brown dwarf at 12 pc

Page 37: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Synergies?

The obvious…

• Combine with ground based observations

• Targeted follow-up of peculiar systems

• Extend time baselines

Page 38: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

How you do that???

𝒗 𝑯𝑰𝑹𝑬𝑺(𝒕 )=𝜸𝟏+𝑲 ¿

𝒗 𝑯𝑨𝑹𝑷𝑺(𝒕 )=𝜸𝟐+𝑲 ¿

𝒖 (𝒕 )=𝒖𝟎+𝝁 ′𝜶 (𝒕−𝒕𝟎 )−𝝅𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜶𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜶(𝒕)

v

𝒓=¿(�⃗�−�⃗�𝟎) �⃗�>¿

Gaia

𝑿 (𝒕 )=𝑿𝟎+𝝁𝜶 (𝒕−𝒕𝟎)−𝝅�⃗�𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜶𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜶 (𝒕)

𝒀 (𝒕)=𝒀 𝟎+𝝁𝜹 (𝒕− 𝒕𝟎 )−𝝅𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜹𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜹 (𝒕 )

CAPS

DopplerM

CMC

Page 39: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

How you do that???

𝒗 𝑯𝑰𝑹𝑬𝑺(𝒕 )=𝜸𝟏+𝑲 ¿

𝒗 𝑯𝑨𝑹𝑷𝑺(𝒕 )=𝜸𝟐+𝑲 ¿

𝒖 (𝒕 )=𝒖𝟎+𝝁 ′𝜶 (𝒕−𝒕𝟎 )−𝝅𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜶𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜶(𝒕)

v

𝒓=¿(�⃗�−�⃗�𝟎) �⃗�>¿

Gaia

𝑿 (𝒕 )=𝑿𝟎+𝝁𝜶 (𝒕−𝒕𝟎)−𝝅�⃗�𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜶𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜶 (𝒕)

𝒀 (𝒕)=𝒀 𝟎+𝝁𝜹 (𝒕− 𝒕𝟎 )−𝝅𝒙𝒐𝒃𝒔 ∙ �̂�𝜹𝑨𝑼 +∆𝜹 (𝒕 )

CAPS

DopplerM

CMC

Page 40: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)
Page 41: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

𝑿 (𝒕 )=𝑿𝟎+𝝁𝜶 (𝒕−𝒕𝟎)−𝝅𝒑 (𝒕 )+𝑨𝒄𝒐𝒔 (𝒘𝒕 )+𝑩𝒔𝒊𝒏 (𝒘𝒕 )

𝒀 (𝒕 )=𝒀 𝟎+𝝁𝜹 (𝒕− 𝒕𝟎 )−𝝅𝒒(𝒕 )+𝑪𝒄𝒐𝒔 (𝒘𝒕 )+𝑫𝒔𝒊𝒏(𝒘𝒕 )

Astrometric model is LINEAR in the relevant quantities

Only becomes (a bit) more complicate when combined with RVs, or for highly eccentric orbits (e>0.6)

Page 42: Guillem Anglada-Escude  (1,2) Alan P. Boss(1) Alycia  Weinberger (1) Ian Thompson (1)

Conclusions

Experience : As ground based transit surveys did for COROT & Kepler… prepares the tools, identifies pitfalls

Cool parallaxes NOW : Ground based astrometry, gives your parallaxes NOW at sufficient accuracy (nearby cool stars)

When Gaia data is released (residuals, not solutions!) …

• Combine astrometric solutions• Time to pack (at least CAPS, RECONS and a few others)• … work continues on L, T and Y dwarfs! (nIR astrometry)

First population statistics of ‘long period’ Gas giants around M dwarfs available before Gaia