Guideline for SLE Management

download Guideline for SLE Management

of 53

Transcript of Guideline for SLE Management

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    1/53

    1

    Guideline for SLE

    management

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    2/53

    2

    Epidemiology of SLE

    Prevalence of SLE

    In U.S18-24/100000

    black female7.9-10.5/100000

    white female4/100000

    More common in urban than in rural areas

    Femalemale=1.4-5.81 (children)8-131 (adult)

    21 (older)

    Onset age=65% between 16-55 y/o

    20% < 16 y/o

    15% > 55 y/o

    Identical twin30%

    first degre relative5%

    Annual incidence of new case6/100000 (low-risk group)

    35/100000 (high risk group)

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    3/53

    3

    Subacute Cutaneous Lupus

    Erythematosus Widespread, non-scarring but often

    photosensitive rash

    Annular or papulosquamous morphology Mild systemic disease common but renal

    involvement rare

    Positive ANA in most patients, but anti-nDNAuncommon Anti-Ro in two thirds patients

    HLA-DR3 present in the majority of patients

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    4/53

    4

    Symptoms Percentage

    Fatigue 80-100

    Fever >80

    Weight loss >60

    Arthritis, arthralgia 95

    SkinButterfly rashPhotosensitivityMucous membrane lesion

    AlopeciaRaynauds phenomenonPurpuraUrticaria

    >80>50

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    5/53

    5

    Table 9-3. THE SPECTRUM OF ANAs

    Chromatin

    Anti-native DNA

    Anti-single-stranded DNA

    Anti-Z DNA

    Anti-centromere

    Anti-Ku

    Anti-HMG proteinsAnti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70 antigen)

    Anti-topoisomerase II

    Anti-PBC 95K

    Anti-lamins

    Nucleolar Components

    Anti-RNA polymerase I

    Anti-Th

    Anti-Us (fibrillarin)

    Anti-Pm/Scl

    Anti-NOR-90

    Other Cellular ComponentsAnti-unclear pore complexes

    Anti-centrosomes

    Anti-midbody

    Anti-spindle

    Anti-Mi

    Anti-Su

    Nuclear Ribonucleoproteins

    Anti-U1 RNP

    Anti-Sm

    Anti-Ro

    Anti-La

    Anti-U2 RNP

    Anti-U4 U6 RNP

    Anti-U5 RNP

    Anti-5S rRNAprotein

    Cytoplasmic Components

    Anti-Jo-1 (tRNAhistidylsynthetase)

    Anti-tRNAalanyl synthetase

    Anti-tRNAthreonyl synthetase

    Anti-tRNAglycyl synthetase

    Anti-signal recognition particle (SRP)Anti-ribosomes

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    6/53

    6

    Fig 1 Four steps in the indirect immunofluorescence assay (cross-sectional view).

    Monolayer cells grown on a glass slide (A) are fixed and permeabilized (B) with chemicals

    such as acetone, methanol, ethanol, or formaldehyde. After a first incubation with patients

    serum containing autoantibodies , cells are washed to get rid of unbound antibodies, and

    the second incubation takes place with fluorescent-labeled anti-buman antibody (D). The

    slides are again washed, mounted with coverslips, and read on a fluorescence microscope.

    Nu, nucleoplasm; Cy, cytoplasm.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    7/53

    7

    CAUSES OF POSITIVE ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODIES

    1. Rheumatic diseases

    Systemic lupus erythematosus

    Polymyositis

    Sjogrens syndrome

    Scleroderma

    Vasculitis

    Rheumatoid arthritis

    2. Normal, healthy individuals

    Females > males, prevalence increases with age

    Relatives of patients with rheumatic diseases

    ? Pregnant females

    3. Drug-induced

    4. Hepatic diseases

    Chronic active hepatitis

    Primary biliary cirrhosis

    Alcoholic liver disease

    5. Pulmonary diseases

    Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

    Asbestos-induced fibrosis

    Primary pulmonary hypertension

    6. Chronic infections

    7. Maliganncies

    LymphomaLeukemiaMelanomaSolid tumors (ovary, breast, lung, kidney)

    8. Hematologic disorders

    Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpuraAutoimmune hemolytic anemia

    9. Miscellaneous

    Endocrine disorders (type I diabetes mellitus, Graves disease)Neurologic diseases (multiple sclerosis)End-stage renal failureAfter organ transplantation

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    8/53

    8

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    9/53

    9

    Serological Tests to Aid

    Diagnosis of SLETest % positive in SLE

    ANA 95%

    Anti-nDNA 60%

    Anti-nRNP 80%

    Anti-Sm 20%

    Anti-Ro 30%

    Anti-La 10%

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    10/53

    10

    Main patterns of autoantibody

    1. HomogenousAnti-histone

    2. PeripheralAnti-dsDNA, Anti-lamine

    3. SpeckledA large family of nonhiston antigens

    -Coarse:Anti-Sm, Anti-U1-nRNP

    -Fine:Anti-Ro, Anti-La

    -Distinct speckles varying in number(PBC)

    Anti-p80-coilin, Anti-p95

    4. Nucleolar Scleroderma or overlap syndrome

    DNA topoisomerase:nucleolar speckles

    PM-Scl:homogenous decorating nucleoliFibrillarin (U3-RNP):clummy nucleolar

    NOR-90:nucleolar speckles

    5. CentromereCREST syndrome, and PBC

    6. Cytoplasmic

    ANCA,

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    11/53

    11

    Positive

    ANA

    Nucleoli

    Raynauds

    phenomenon

    Scleroderma

    Diffuse (honogeneous)

    Anti-nucleoprotein

    SLERADrug LE

    Histone

    SLERADrug LE

    Centromere

    CRESTSdleroderma

    Peripheral (rim)

    Anti-dsDNA

    SLE

    Negative

    No disease

    Lab errorTreatmentRemissionAntigen XSNephrotic syndrome

    No specificityUCTDSLERALiver diseaseMono

    Any chronicinflammatory disease

    RNP

    SLEMCTDRASclerodermaUCTD

    Sm

    SLE

    RO (SS-A)

    SLE

    Sogrenssyndrome

    PcNA

    SLE

    Scl-70

    Scleroderma

    PM/Jo/Ku/Mi

    PM/DM

    La

    SLE

    Sogrenssyndrome

    Speckled

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    12/53

    12

    Tabel 1. CUTANEOUS CHANGES IN LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

    Speclfic

    Discold

    Subacute cutaneousPapulosquamous

    Annular/polycyclic

    Neonatal lupus erythematosus

    Malar dermatitis

    Nonspeclfic Lesions

    Bullous

    Lupus panniculitis

    Alopecia

    Vasculitis

    Urticaria-like vasculitis

    Livedo reticularisRaynauds phenomenon

    Photosensitivity

    Oral ulcerations

    Nail changes

    Cutaneous mucinosis

    Rheumatoid nodules

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    13/53

    13

    Table 61-2. MUSCULOSKELETAL MANIFESTATIONS IN SLE

    SLE RA

    Arthralgia Common Common

    Arthritis Common Deforming

    Symmetry Yes Yes

    Joints involved PIP > MCP > wrist > knee MCp > wrist > knee

    Synovial hypertrophy Rare Common

    Synovial membrane abnormality Minimal Proliferative

    Synovial fluid Transudate Exudate

    Subcutaneous nodules Rare 35%

    Erosions Very rare Common

    Morning stiffness Minutes Hours

    Myalgia Common Common

    Myositis Rare UncommonOsteoporosis Variable Common

    Avascular necrosis 5-50% Uncommon

    Deforming arthritis

    Swan neck

    Ulnar deviation

    Uncommon

    10%

    5%

    Common

    Common

    Common

    MCP, Metacarpophalangeal joint; PIP, proximal interphalangeal joint.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    14/53

    14

    Possible causes of leukopenia in SLE

    Immune destruction

    Marrow suppression

    Hypersplenism

    Drugs

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    15/53

    15

    Possible causes of anemia in SLE

    Anemia of chronic disease

    Auto-immune hemolytic anemia

    Hypoplastic anemia Blood loss due to thrombocytopenia or NSAID use

    Hypersplenism

    Anemia of renal failure

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    16/53

    16

    AN APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF LUPUS THROMBOCYTOPENIA

    Confirm diagnosis by examining peripheral smear and bone marrow examination, and determineseverity

    Rule out drug effects and discontinue all but absolutely essential drugs

    Rule out thrombotic throbocytopenic purpura (may be indicated by anemia with pronouncedreticulocytosis and fragmented erythrocytes in the peripheral smear)

    Rule out infectionviral

    HIV, HBV, CMVbacterialsubacute bacterial endocarditis, gram-negative sepsis

    Look for evidence of lupus activity in other organs; beware of major organ involvement

    Use prednisone 0.25-1.0mg/kg/day for 3-4 weeks if platelets < 50.000/mm3 (unless otherwiseindicated for other manifestations of lupus); taper after 3-4 weeks

    The goal is a stable platelet count > 50.000/mm3

    If prednisone fails or unable to tape, consider danazol (400-800mg/day),-globulin orsplenectomy

    In patients refractory to these modalities or patients with major organ involvement, use monthlypulses of cyclophosphamide for at least 6 months

    Fig. 7.14 An approach to the management of lupus thrombocytopenia.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    17/53

    17

    Lupus lymphadeenitis (I)

    The prevalence of lymphadenopathy range from 12-59% of lupus patients The most common sites are cervical (43%), mesenteric

    (21%), axillary (18%) and inguinal (17%). Unusual sites

    such as hilar, mediastinal and retroperitoneal were also

    reported

    The pathognomonic pathologic feature of lupuslymphadenitis, the hematoxylin body, was described by

    Ginzler and Fox in 1940, which stain with periodic acid-

    Schiff and Feulgen methods, are coalescent amorphicaggregates of deeply basophilic material found within

    areas of lymph node necrosis.

    The hematoxylin bodies are highly specific for SLE, arealso found in glomeruli, endocardium and spleen

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    18/53

    18

    Lupus lymphadeenitis (II)

    Other lymph node features include paracortical focl ofnecrosis marked infiltration by histiocytes, lymphocytes andplasma cells and the preesence of imunoblasts. Neutrophils,

    eosinophils and granulomata are conspiculously absent.

    Both lupus lymphadenitis and KFD are characterized by ofhistiocytic and immunoblastic infiltrates. A prominent plasmacell component strongly suggests lupus lymphadenitis. When

    present, hematoxylin bodies are virtually diagnostic of SLE.

    The clinical feature, building on these pathologicresemblances, supports a link between KFD and SLE.

    Perhaps KFD and SLE share a common inclting event, suchas exposure to an enviromental or infectious agent, that can

    produce either disorder. Alternatively, KFD may be an

    antoimmune-midiated necrotizing lymphadenitis that can

    remain self-limited or develop into SLE

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    19/53

    19

    Primary Respiratory System Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    Upper airway disease

    Epiglottitis

    Subglottic stenosis

    Vocal cord paralysis

    Laryngeal edema or ulceration

    Inflammatory mass lesions or nodules

    Cricoarytenoid arthritis

    Necrotizing vasculitis

    Parenchymal disease

    Acute lupus pneumonitis

    Alveolar hemorrhage syndrome

    Chronic lupus pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease

    Lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia or pseudolymphoma

    Bronchiolitis obliterans with or without organizing pneumonia

    Respiratory muscle disease

    Shrinking lung syndrome

    Pleural disease

    Pleuritis with or without effusion

    Vascular diaease

    Pulmonary hypertension

    Pulmonary embolism

    Acute reversible hypoxemia

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    20/53

    20

    Pulmonary Involvement In SLE

    Pleural disease

    Acute lupus pneumonitis

    Chronic interstitial lung disease

    Pulmonary hemorrhage

    Pulmonary embolism

    Pulmonary vascular disease

    Diaphragmatic dysfunction

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    21/53

    21

    Cardic manifestation of SLE

    Pericardium Pericarditis with or without

    effusion

    Cardiac tamponade (rare)

    Constrictive perlcarditis

    Myocardium Myocarditis

    Endocardium Libman-Sacks endocarditis

    Coronary artery Accelerated atherosclerosis

    vasculitis

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    22/53

    22

    Common Clinical and Laboratory Findings in Lupus Nephritis

    Disordered fluid and electrolyte balanceNocturia, decreased urinary concentrating capacity, hyperkalemia,

    renal tubular acidosis

    Nephritic syndromeHematuria, cellular casts; variable bypertension, edema, proteinuria,

    azotemia

    Nephrotic syndromeFrothy urine, edema, proteinuria >3.5g per day, lipiduria (fatty casts,

    oval fat bodies, doubly refractile fat bodies), hypoalbuminemia,

    hyperlipidemia

    Secondary complications of nephrotic syndrome includevolume depletion, prerenal azotemia, venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism,

    atherosclerosis, hypogammaglobulinemia

    Renal insufficiency

    Acute, rapidly progressive or chronic renal failure

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    23/53

    23

    Characteristic Clinicopathologic Correlations in the Major Classes of Lupus Nephritis

    Normal or minimal disease

    Mesangial lupus nephritis

    Clinicallow-grade hematuria, proteinuria, normal renal function

    Pathologyincreased mesangial cells, matrix, and immune complexes; patent glomerular

    capillary loops

    Focal proliferative lupus nephritis

    Clinicalnephritic urine sediment, variable but usually nonnephrotic proteinuriaPathologysegmental proliferation, necrosis, crescents compromising capillary loops in 50% of glomeruli; variable sclerosis, atrophy, andfibrosis; mesangial, subendothelial, and subepithelial immune complex deposits

    Membranous nephropathy

    Clinicalnephrotic syndrome

    Pathologydiffuse capillary loop thickening; subepithelial immune deposits

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    24/53

    24

    Morphological Classification of Lupus Nephritis

    (modified WHO Classification)

    Class Biopsy finding

    I Normal glomerule

    II Pure messngial alterationIII Focal proliferative glomerulonephritis

    IV Diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis

    V Menbranous glomerulopathyVI Advanced glomerulosclerosis

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    25/53

    25

    INDICES OF ACTIVITY AND CHRONICITY IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS*

    Activity Index (Range 0 to 24)

    Glomerular hypercillularity

    Leukocyte exudation

    Karyorrhexis/fibrinoid necrosis

    Cellular crescents

    Hyaline thrombi

    Tubulointerstitial inflammationChronicity index (Range 0 to 12)

    Glomerular lesions

    Glomerular sclerosis

    Fibrous crescents

    Tubulointerstitial lesionsTubular atrophy

    Interstitial fibrosis

    *Individual lesions are scored 0 to 3+ (absent, mild, moderate, severe). Indices are composite scores for

    individual lesions in each category of activity or chronicity. Necrosis/karyorrhexis and cellular crescents

    are weighted by a factor of 2.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    26/53

    26

    INDICATIONS FOR RENAL BIOPSY IN LUPUS NEPHRITIS

    Proteinuria of >1g/day

    The threshold is conventionally 1-2g/dayLess proteinuria does not preclude biopsy if it occurs in the context of major serologicabnormalities, especially hypocomplementemiaAt the other extreme, the presence of full-bolwn nephrotic and nephritic syndromes may makerenal biopsy unnecessary

    Progressive azotemia

    Decreasing renal function in associtaion with active urinary sediment is an indication for biopsyin order to assess the extent of crescents and necrosis which would warrant very aggressivetherapy

    Ambiguity or inconsistency of data

    Lupus nephritis of indeterminate duration, severity and potential responsiveness warrants theestablishment of a fresh baseline database including determination of class,activity andchronicity indices

    Overlapping clinical features

    Situations where clinical and laboratory data are compatible with different classes of lupusnephritis, for which different approaches to management are warranted

    Redirection of therapy

    Partially treated or incompletely responsive lupus nephritis for which a change in therapeuticplan is deemed appropriate

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    27/53

    27

    SLE and ESRD (1)

    5-22% of SLE patients progress to ESRD requiring H/D

    In USA, Iupus nephropathy accounting for 1.4% off allESRD

    Decreased clinical and serological lupus activity

    following ESRD. Some theories had

    1.Depressed cellular and humoral immunity

    2.Lack of mediators produced by the kidney

    3.Removal of lupus factors by dialysis itself4.Nature end point in SLE

    Survival of lupus patients on dialysis versus non-SLEdialysis patientsno significant

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    28/53

    28

    SLE and ESRD (2)

    Renal transplant graft survival of lupus versus non-lupuspatientsno difference

    Lupus patients have slightly better outcome with LRrather than CAD grafts

    The transplantation time following dialysis need at least3 months

    Recurrence of transplanted allograft is often similar to

    histologic or immunofluorescent type as in the originkidney, but it is a rare event.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    29/53

    29

    NEUROPSYCHIATRIC MANIFESTATIONS IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

    Central Nervous System

    Diffuse manifestations (35%-60%) Seizures (15%-35%)

    Organic brain syndromes

    Organic amnestic/cognitive dysfunction

    Dementia

    Altered consciousness

    Grand mal

    Focal

    Temporal lobe

    Petit mal

    Psychiatric

    Psychosis

    Organic mood/anxiety syndromes

    Other

    Headaches

    Aseptic meningitis

    Pseudotumor cerebri

    Normal pressure hydrocephalus

    Focal manifestations (10%-35%)

    Cranial neuropathies

    Cerebrovascular accidents/strokes

    Transverse myelltis

    Movement disorders

    Peripheral Nervous System

    Peripheral Neuropathies (10%-20%) Other

    Sensory polyneuropathy

    Mononeruitis multiplex

    Chronic, relapsing polyneruopathy

    Guillien-Barre syndrome

    Autonomic noruopathy

    Myasthenial gravis

    Eaton-Lambert syndrome

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    30/53

    30

    PATHOGENETIC MECHANISMS CAUSING NEUROPSYCHIATRIC

    SYMPTOMS IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

    Primary Secondary

    Autoantibody mediatedAntineuronal antibodies

    Vascular occlusion

    Immune complex-mediated vasculitis

    Immune complex-mediated anaphylatoxin

    release causing leukoagglutination

    Antiphospholipid antibody-associated

    hypercoagulability

    Thrombosis

    Emboli from cardiac source

    Cytokine effects

    Combination of mechanisms

    InfectionHypertensionUremia

    Electrolyte imbalances

    Hypoxia

    Fever

    Thyroid disease

    Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuraAtherosclerotic strokes

    Emboli from valvular vegetations

    Subdural hematoma

    Cerebral lymphoma

    Medications

    Drug overdose

    Corticosteroids

    NSAIDs

    Hydroxychloroquine

    Azathioprine

    Fibromyalgia

    Reactive depression

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    31/53

    31

    Pathogenesis of Neuropsychiatric Events in Patients with SLE

    Primary events

    Vascular occlusion from immune-complex-mediated or antibody (for example,antiphospholipid)mediated vasculopathy, vasculitis, leukoagglutination, or

    thrombosis.

    Cerebral dysfunction from antibodies to brain tissue (antineruonal,

    antiribosomal P protein) or cytokines (interleukin-6, interferon-).

    Secondary eventsInfection (meningitis, abscess, discitis)

    Cerebrovascular accidents due to accelerated atherosclerosis

    Hypertensive encephalopathy

    Metabolic encephalopathy (uremia, electrolyte imbalance, fever, hypoxia)

    Hypercoagulable state due to the nephrotic syndrome

    Drugs (glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, trimethoprim and

    sulfamethoxazole, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine).

    Intrathecal production or entrance through a blood-brain barrier disturbed by

    vascular injury.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    32/53

    32

    FREQUENCY OF ABNORMAL LABORATORY TESTS COMMONLY USED IN THE

    EVALUATION OF NEUROPSYCHIATRIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

    Test Frequency of

    Abnormal Test Result

    Range (%)

    Comment

    Serologic

    Antimeuronal antibodies

    Antineurofilament antibodies

    Antiribosomal-P antibodies

    Antiphospholipid antibodies

    30-92

    58

    45-90

    45-80

    Diffuse manifestations

    Diffuse manifestations

    Psychosis/depression

    Focal manifestations, strokes

    Cerebrospinal fluid

    Routine

    Pleocytosis

    Increased protein]

    Low glucose

    6-34

    22-50

    3-8

    Rule out infection and NSAID meningitis

    Nonspecific

    Rule out infection, transerse myelitis

    SpecialAntineuronal antibodies (lgG)

    Elevated Q albumin

    Elevated lgG/lgM index

    Oligoclonal bands (2 bands)

    90

    8-33

    25-66

    20-82

    Diffuse manifestations, present in 40%

    with focal manifestations

    Break in blood-brain barrier

    Diffuse manifestations

    Diffuse manifestations

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    33/53

    33

    Pathologic studies in NPLE

    Several autopsy series agree on several important points

    There is no pathognomonic lesion that NPLE causes in

    the brain that is diagnostically specific like the wire loop

    lesion observed in lupus nephritis.

    Active vasculitis is rare, bland vasculopathy (vascularhyalinization, perivascular imflammation, and endothelial

    proliferation associated with microinfarcts and

    hemorrhage is the most common pathologic abnormalities

    seen.)

    Clinical manifestations may not be readily explained by

    pathologic findings, some NPLE patients, particularly

    those with diffuse neuropsychiatric manifestations may

    have normal or unremarkable brain pathology.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    34/53

    34

    Proactive and preventive strategies in

    addition to lupus therapies(1)

    Patients education programs, eliminate patientnonadherence

    Monitor vital signs, update physical examination, and

    have laboratory work done Adhere to a general conditioning exercise program to

    minimize osteoporosis and muscle atrophy

    Cognitive therapy for lupus fog;biofeedback forRaynauds phenomenon

    Counseling and stress management

    Physical and occupational therapy, ergonomic workstation evaluation

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    35/53

    35

    Proactive and preventive strategies in

    addition to lupus therapies(2)

    Aggressive proactive management of blood pressure,blood sugars, serum lipids, and weight. Smokingcessation.

    Yearly bone densitometry and osteoporosisprevention measures.

    Annual electrocardiogram and chest x-ray

    Prompt evaluation of all fevers

    Periodic screening with carotid duplex scanning,treadmill, or stress testing; screening for, andprophylactic management of, antiphospholipidantibodies.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    36/53

    36

    Therapies for lupus patients with

    skin lesions(1)

    General

    Avoid sun: clothing, sunscreens, avoid hot part of

    day with most UV-B light, camouflage cosmetics

    Stop smoking (so antimalarials works better)

    Thiazides and sulfonylureals may exacerbate skin

    disease

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    37/53

    37

    Therapies for lupus patients with

    skin lesions(2)

    Routine therapy

    Topical steroids, intralesional steroids

    Hydroxychloroquine

    Oral corticosteroids

    Dapsone for bullous lesions

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    38/53

    38

    Therapies for lupus patients with

    skin lesions(3)

    Advanced therapy for resistant causes

    Subacute cutaneous lupus: mycophenylate

    mofetil, retinoids, or cyclosporine Discoid lesions: chloroquine, clofazimine,thalidomide, or cyclosporine

    Lupus profundus: dapsone

    Chronic lesions over 50% of body: topicalnitrogen mustard, BCNU, or tacrolimus

    Vasculitis: may need immunosuppressives

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    39/53

    39

    Therapy for lupus patients with arthritis

    (no internal organ involvement)

    First line: NSAIDs

    Cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors

    (but may induce thrombotic risk in

    patients with antiphospholipid antibodies)

    Low dose hydroxychloroquine(200mg

    twice a day)

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    40/53

    40

    Indications of high dose corticosteroid

    therapy in lupus patients

    Severe lupus nephritis

    CNS lupus with severe manifestations

    Autoimmune thrombocytopenia withextremely low platelet counts(e.g.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    41/53

    41

    Life-Threatening Manifestations of SLE:

    Responses to glucocorticoids(1)

    Manifestations often responsive to glucocorticoids

    Vasculitis

    Severe dermatitis of subacute cutaneous lupus

    erythematosus or SLE

    Polyarthritis

    Polyserositispericarditis, pleurisy, peritonitis

    Myocarditis Lupus pneumonitis

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    42/53

    42

    Life-Threatening Manifestations of SLE:

    Responses to glucocorticoids(2)

    ~(continue)

    Glomerulonephritisproliferative forms

    Hemolytic anemia

    Thrombocytopenia Diffuse CNS syndromeacute confusional state,

    demyelinating syndromes, intractable headache

    Serious cognitive defects

    Myelopathies Peripheral neuropathies

    Lupus crisishigh fever and prostration

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    43/53

    43

    Life-Threatening Manifestations of SLE:

    Responses to glucocorticoids(3)

    Manifestations not often responsive toglucocorticoids Thrombosisincludes strokes

    Glomerulonephritisscarred end-stage renaldisease, pure membranous glomerulonephritis

    Resistant thrombocytopenia or hemolyticanemiaoccurs in a minority of patients; considersplenectomy, cytotoxics, danazol, orcyclosporine/neoral therapies

    Psychosis related to conditions other than SLE,such as glucocorticoid therapy

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    44/53

    44

    Therapy for patients with lupus nephritis

    Previously untreated patients with active

    lupus nephritis or severe manifestations

    ( decreased renal function and /or high-grade proteinuria)

    First line: high doses of corticosteroids

    (about 1mg/kg/day) Cytotoxic drugs or other

    immunosuppressive drugs

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    45/53

    45

    The indications of cytotoxic drugs use in

    the treatment of lupus nephritis

    Active and severe GN despite treatment withhigh dose prednisone

    Responded to corticosteroids but require anunacceptably high dose to maintain aresponse.

    Unacceptable side effects fromcorticosteroids.

    Chronic damage on a renal biopsy and otherindicators of a poor prognosis.

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    46/53

    46

    Systemic therapies for nonorgan-

    threatening lupus

    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    Antimalarials

    Thalidomide Hormonal interventions:

    dehydroepiandrosterone, testosterone

    patches, bromocriptine, prolactin Immunosuppressive therapies:

    azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    47/53

    47

    The management of organ-threatening lupus

    Existing immunosuppressive therapies:

    cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil,

    cyclosporine A, fludarabine, cladribine (2-CDA)

    Apheresis

    Intravenous immunoglobulin

    Various biologic agents: BlyS inhibitor, CTLA-4Ig,

    LL2IgG

    Stem cell transplantation

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    48/53

    48

    Use of Cytotoxic Drugs in SLE :

    Azathioprine

    requires 612 months to work well

    13 mg/kg/day(initial dose)

    12 mg/kg/day(maintenance dose) Advantage:probably reduces flares, reduces

    renalscarring, reduces glucocorticoid dose

    requirement Side effects: Bone marrow suppression,

    leukopenia, infection(herpes zoster), infertility,malignancy, early menopause, hepatic

    damage, nausea

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    49/53

    49

    Use of Cytotoxic Drugs in SLE:

    Cyclophosphamide

    requires 216 weeks to work well

    Initial dose:1-3 mg/kg/day orally or 820mg/kg intravenously once a monthplus mesna

    Maintenance dose:0.52 mg/kg/day orally or 820mg/kg intravenously every 412 wks plus mesna

    Adverse effects:probably reduces flares, reducesrenal scarring, reduces glucocorticoid dose

    requirement Adverse effects: marrow suppression, leukopenia,

    infection, infertility, malignancy,menopause,cystitis,nausea

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    50/53

    50

    The treatment in lupus patients with

    autoimmune thrombocytopenia

    Splenectomy

    Danazol

    Immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs:azathioprine, cyclophosphamide

    Intravenous immunoglobulin(IVIG)

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    51/53

    51

    Other management principles in the

    treatment of lupus patients(1)

    Thrombosis-Anticoagulation

    Recurrent fetal loss with antiphospholipid

    -Heparin in low dose or low-molecular-weightheparin with or without aspirin

    -If heparin ineffective or not tolerated, use low-doseaspirin alone

    -Glucocorticoids plus aspirin in moderate to highdose may be used but is controversial

    Thrombocytopenia or hemolytic anemia

    -Intravenous gamma globulin, splenectomy, danazol,

    cyclosporine, cytotoxic drugs

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    52/53

    52

    Other management principles in the

    treatment of lupus patients(2)

    Seizures without other serious manifestations

    -Anticonvulsants

    Behavior disorders or psychosis without otherserious manifestations:

    -Psychoactive drugs, neuroleptics

    Pure membranous glomerulonephritis:

    -Limited trials of immunosuppressives or no specific

    treatment

  • 7/27/2019 Guideline for SLE Management

    53/53

    53

    Other management principles in the

    treatment of lupus patients(3)

    Avoid possible disease triggers-sulfaantibiotics, sun, high estrogen-containingbirth control pills,alfalfa sprouts

    Prevent atherosclerosis Prevent osteoporosis

    Prevent infection

    Prevent progression of renal disease

    Prevent clots in patients with antiphospholipidantibodies

    Treat fatigue.