GSMP Local Community Network Global Agenda 27 May 2010 Melanie Kudela.
GSMP Local Community Network Global Agenda 23 Apr 2009 Melanie Kudela.
-
Upload
molly-russell -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of GSMP Local Community Network Global Agenda 23 Apr 2009 Melanie Kudela.
GSMP Local Community NetworkGlobal Agenda 23 Apr 2009 Melanie Kudela
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
LCN Global Agenda / Enhanced Process
Welcome to the GSMP Local Community Network Global Agenda Meeting!
• Key Milestones for this GA Cycle
• Last Survey Response Summary
• New Links
• Optional: Enhanced Process Update to Process Group
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Key Milestones for this GA Cycle
Event Date Comments
Global Agenda Meeting with MO Liaison and GS1 Staff and GA Survey Live
23 Apr In progress
CR Feedback GA Survey Closed 08 May
Results posted By 15 May
BRG/ WG Discussion (CR Feedback Results) By 22 May
Next LCN Global Agenda Conference Call and Live Meeting – Thursday
25 June
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
WO#08-181 – Question from BarCodes & Identification Work Group
WO#08-181- Indicator Rules
1. Do you have any trade item with more than eight packaging levels above the lowest retail packaging level?
Yes – 8%; No – 92%
Responses:
1 we have protional product with the same GTIN which are sold in many logistics 'pallet or display-shipper)
2 GTIN-14 with indicator 1-8 is not used in Germany, instead a GTIN-13 is used for all hierarchy levels. Due to limitations of the current indicator concept a release of indicator 1-8 with no meaning would be supported in order increase GTIN capacity.
3 GTIN-14 with indicator 1-8 is not used in Germany, instead a GTIN-13 is used for all hierarchy levels. Due to limitations of the current indicator concept a release of indicator 1-8 with no meaning would be supported in order to increase GTIN capacity.
4 No we do not have that in our company.
GTIN-14 with indicator 1-8 is not used in Germany, instead a GTIN-13 is used for all hierarchy levels. Due to limitations of the current indicator concept a release of indicator 1-8 with no meaning would be supported in order increase GTIN capacity.
5 Existing legacy applications should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified.
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
WO#08-181 – Question from BarCodes & Identification Work Group
2. If the answer is Yes, how many of your trade items have more than eight
packaging levels above the lowest retail packaging level? Response
1 40% of our catalog
3. What is the highest number of packaging levels above the lowest retail packaging for your trade items?
Response
1 4 levels. This excludes any products that may be cut in stores (ie watermellon)
2 6
3 between 25 and 30
4 max. 5
5 4
6 Four different level.
7 4
8 5 (each-display-case-carton-layer-pallet)
9 2
10 the highest number is 4
11 I think six, I will check.
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
BarCodes Business User Group CR# 09-003 - GDTI Serialization
1. Do you support the proposed solution to change the serial component part of GDTI to include alphanumeric characters and to change AI 253 accordingly?
1 THis does not impact our business. You would need to ensure that any systems can cope with receiving an Alpha rather than numeric number.
2 However, we are not currently utilising the AI and hence weight bearing from this answer is not heavy.
3 test test test
4 Existing legacy applications should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified
5 EXISTING LEGACY APPLICATIONS SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION: tHE BUSINESS REQUIREMENTS NEED TO BE CLEARLY SPECIFIED:
6 No. Existing legacyapplicationsn should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified.
7 Existing legacy applications should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified.
8 Existing legacy applications should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified.
9 I do not understand this well enough to comment on.
10 Existing legacy applications should be taken into account. The business requirements need to be clearly specified.
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Code List Improvement Work Group WO#08-000013 Q1
PackagingMaterial and PackagingType Code Lists
1. Please indicate which of the following applications are given to packaging material /packaging type codes in your organisation:
Responses
• Filter the list of SKUs assigned by distribution centre 43%
• Manage the reusable assets (plastic crates, pallets, plastic casks...) 57%
• Understand the different tolerance for products 14%
• Communicate the composition of the materials used in the packaging so proper waste management fees can be calculated 43%
• Environmental product tax and returnable trade item information 71%
• Other or Additional Comment 14%
• it should really be the data recipients to answer
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Code List Improvement Work Group WO#08-000013 Q2-4
PackagingMaterial and PackagingType Code Lists
2. Are there any live (in production) processes based on this information in your organisation?
Responses
Yes 75% No 25%
3. If the response to Q2 is yes, please specify.
Responses 1 -5 Based on master data of packaging material information actual amount of waste/recycling material (e.g. paper) is calculated within waste management process6 to check to which level EA / CS / PA the GTIN corresponds
4. Is it necessary for your organization to receive this information through GDSN?
Responses
Yes 7 100% No 0 0%it should really be the data recipients to answer
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Trade Item Implementation Guide Work Group WO#08-000270
The team is currently working on this topic to be included in the GDSN Trade Item Implementation Guide. If you have any documented procedures for GDSN for working with tax information for your country or region, please provide us that information. [Additional documentation and information can be sent to your MO Liaison who will forward it to the GSMP Staff.]
Responses 1 In Germany only the VAT rate is included in master data.2 In Germany the VAT rate only is included in tax.3 In Germany only the VAT rate is included in master data.4 In Germany only the VAT rate is included in master data.5 green dot tax6 In Germany only the VAT rate is included in master data.7 In Germany only the VAT rate is included in master data
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Level Below Each CR#08-000285
Proposal: Identify and clearly define the level below the each and add to the standards for identification for exchange of relevant product attribute information via GDSN. This request is about product hierarchy and data synchronization.
1. The issue with clearly defining the level below each has been that the one retailer requires these items to be communicated as an EA and an "Orderable" level. Do all retailers agree that they will synchronize using this hierarchy - "an EA and an 'Orderable' level"?
Responses
Agree 12% Disagree 75% Other or Additional Information 75% Response 1 (see comment in Box Question 10 below)2-4 The EA is not necessarily an orderable unit. Quest5 we use TradeItemAnOrderableUnit attribute6 Not a retailer
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Level Below Each CR#08-000285
2. GDSN Level Below Each CR#08-000285 (Question 2 of 4) 2. How do retailers and suppliers handle the level below the each currently?
Response 1 Currently information on components below each are displayed within the level of this product.The EA is not necessarily an orderable unit. Question whether retailer can process any levels below the EACH not uniquely identified with a GTIN. There are some areas where an GTIN is an EACH and contains two physical products (hair colouring product combined with a spray). In this case the products would have different dangerous goods information. But these can be handled within the specified GTIN, as the attribute class of dangerous goods is repeatable. If there is a need to give more information of the different product there should be additional information / attributes to describe these information. But there should be no additional level below the EACH.The EA s not necessarily an orderable unit. It's questioned whether retailer can process any levels below the EACH not uniquely with a GTIN. Thee are some areas where a GTIN is an EACH and contains two physical products (e.g. hair colouring product combined with a spray).In this case the products would have different dangerous goods information. But theses can be handled within the specified GTIN, as th atribute class of dangerous goods is repeatable. If there is a need to give more information of the different product there should be additional information / attributes to describe these information.But there should be no additional level below the EACH.
2 we do not send information below Each
3- 7 Currently information on components below each are displayed within the level of this product (see above).
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
GDSN Level Below Each CR#08-000285
3. Please provide examples or use cases of your response to Q2.
Response 1 - 6 E.g. in case a product (each) consists of two components and for these components hazardous information needs to be provided, the relevant attribute is repeated (see above).
4. GDSN Level Below Each CR#08-000285 (Question 4 of 4) 4. Use this example to answer the next question: There is a case of 232 White Hamburger Bun Dough. How should the information about the product be sent?
Responses
A one level hierarchy as an EA (which would actually be describing the Case) and then the new "sub each" level describing the 232 dough pieces? There maybe some attributes for the dough pieces that could be somewhat challenging to capture. 12%
A CA/EA hierarchy, identifying the EA as the dough pieces with a virtual GTIN assigned to the dough pieces? 0%
A one level hierarchy as a CA and only describe the case and nothing inside the case? 0%
Other or Additional Information 88% 1 C. A+B may cause problems at retailer.2 - 5 A onelevel hierarchy as described in "C", 5 1 level hier. as an EA or a 2 levels hier. PL-EA 7 The options A and B may cause problems in retailer
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
LCN Global Agenda Cycle Links
• Apr GA (23 Apr Calendar Event)
http://community.gs1.org/apps/org/workgroup/gsmp_g_lcn/calendar.php
• Feb Survey Results
http://www.gs1.org/services/gsmp/lcn/lcn_members.html
LCN Process Group Update
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Awareness / Take Away
• Liaisons firmly committed to continued progress and success of LCN
• Interaction with global groups
Raise LCN level of importance Persuade MO decision makers and
supporting staff of LCN’s relevance
Capture and address MOs’ key concerns / interests
Concrete plan to realize goal
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Works As Documented
• Adhering to LCN Principles
• Easy access to tools and CRoom Hindrance to smaller MOs joining is lack of
single global collaborative communications infrastructure
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Works As Documented
• Responsibilities
• LCN Monthly Cycles
Ensure closure on feedback Confirm feedback clearly
communicated back to BRG / WG Communicate feedback impact and
consequences back to LCN
Institutionalize LCN standing agenda item across board
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Works as Documented
• Key MO readiness criteria Resolve representation dilemma LCN designed to bring community to
table
• Multi-Industry
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Works As Documented
• LCN Feedback and Validation Model
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Analysis of QuestionsCR Type of
QuestionScenario Result Sourced
from
07-223 Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-332-I Reconnaissance GSMP
07-332-II Reconnaissance GSMP
07-332-III Reconnaissance GSMP
07-332-IV Reconnaissance GSMP
07-339 Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-350 Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-415 Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-420 Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-422 Feedback Divergence:GS1 Ge, Co, Ne
GSMP
07-425I Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-425II Feedback Agreement GSMP
07-432 Feedback Agreement or Divergence?
GSMP
07-435 Submitter withdrawn
08-075 Feedback Agreement GSMP
08-080 CPD
Reconnaissance eCOM UG
08-085 Feedback Agreement GSMP
08-104 Feedback Divergence GSMP
08-118 I Reconnaissance GSMP
08-118 II Reconnaissance GSMP
CR Type of Question
Scenario Result Sourced from
08-130 & 08-201
Reconnaissance GSMP
08-131 Reconnaissance GSMP
08-163 Reconnaissance GSMP
08-181 Reconnaissance GSMP
08-181 Reconnaissance GSMP
08-270 Reconnaissance GSMP
08-285 Reconnaissance GDSN User Gr
09-003 Reconnaissance Bar Codes UG
EANCOM 2002CD
Divergence GS1 Ge GSMP
XML Tech Qs Reconnaissance eCom Tech UG
Price Sync Reconnaissance GDSN UG GS1 Au
GS1-128 AI-11 Feedback Divergence GS1 Ge GSMP
Packaging Code List
Reconnaissance GSMP
No # Reconnaissance GDSN UG
Gov Agency Reconnaissance BarCode UG GS1 Malay De
Prod Spec Attributes
Reconnaissance GSMP
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Not Documented
Procedures for
Questions sourced from Business Units
Reconnaissance type questions
2 way dialogue ex. Questions sourced from
GS1 Australia GS1 Denmark and GS1 Malaysia
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Works as Documented
Checklist 1
New Member Country Launch Checklist 2
Establish MO LCN Team in your Country Checklist 3
GA Responsibilities of LCN Liaisons
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Not Working as Documented
• World Trade Organization Compliance (TBD)
• Projected LCN User growth
Not yet realized
• New MOs participate but without registering community
Designed to bring user community
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Summary: Key Opportunities
• Participating MO Liaisons strongly committed to LCN
• LCN Champions in participating and prospective MOs
• Need our strong support
Improve communication of feedback impact
Elevate importance of LCN to MO! Define plan to capture MO’s key needs
in 2 step model
Global Standards Management Process ©2007 GS1 US
Contact Details
Melanie Kudela
GS1
Director, GDSN Technology
D +1 609 620 4514
F +1 609 620-1200