GSA Training Conference and Expo 2010 Learn What's New with the BioPreferred Program Jeff Goodman...
-
Upload
jocelyn-vanessa-gray -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of GSA Training Conference and Expo 2010 Learn What's New with the BioPreferred Program Jeff Goodman...
GSA Training Conference and Expo 2010
Learn What's New with the
BioPreferred ProgramJeff Goodman
Chief, EnvironmentalManagement Division
USDA
Steve DevlinProgram Manager
Iowa State University
Discussion Topics
• Overview of BioPreferredSM Program
• USDA’s role
• Implementation strategy
• Program updates
− Designated items
− Labeling program
• Revising program guidelines
• Timeline
2
What is BioPreferred?
• USDA brand name for Biobased Markets Program established in Farm Bill
• Identifies and seeks to establish new markets for biobased products
• Two major program elements:
– Federal procurement preference program requires Federal agencies and contractors to purchase qualifying products
– Voluntary labeling program will allow product vendors to use a USDA logo to identify qualifying products
3
What are biobased products?
• Biobased products are those the Secretary of Agriculture determines to be composed in whole or large part of renewable agricultural or forestry materials
• Biobased products can include plant, animal, and marine materials
4
Why promote biobased products?
• Climate Change Impact Reduction —Qualifying biobased products reduce introduction of new fossil carbon into atmosphere
• Energy/Environmental Security — Biobased products replace petroleum products, helping to increase U.S. energy and environmental security and independence
• Economic Development — Biobased products create “green” jobs
5
Speaking of the law…
• Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (2002 Farm Bill)
• Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (2008 Farm Bill)
• Energy Policy Act of 2005 - Sections 205 and 943
• Executive Order 13423 - January 24, 2007
• FAR Updated - November 7, 2008
7
2008 Farm Bill Changes
• Updates definition of biobased product
• Permits designation of intermediate ingredients and feedstocks and certain products derived from them
• Permits labeling of intermediate ingredients, feedstocks, and complex products
• Directs USDA to establish national registry of testing centers
• Specifies detailed reportingrequirements
• Requires management plan8
Implementation Strategy
9
Vision
Mission
Strategic Goals
To contribute to reducing the Nation’s dependence on foreign oil, strengthening the economy, and preserving the environment through the increased use of biobased products
To facilitate the development and expansion of markets for biobased products
Increase the Federal procurement of biobased products government-wide
Increase biobased market development through the voluntary-labeling program
Federal Procurement Preference
One year following designation of biobased items in the Federal Register, Federal departments and agencies must give a procurement preference to designated items composed of biobased products unless those items:
• Are not reasonably available;
• Do not perform adequately; or
• Are not reasonably priced.
10
USDA’s Role in Federal Procurement
Preference Program
• Establish Guidelines (published January 11, 2005)
• Designate BioPreferred items - or generic groupings of biobased products that receive procurement preference
• Establish BioPreferred model procurement program
11
Item Designation Process
• Information collection
• Testing and evaluation
– Biobased content measurement
– Environmental life-cycle assessment
• Determination of minimum biobased content
• Preparation and publishing of proposed rule
• Evaluation of public comments
• Promulgation of final rule12
Designated Items
• 42 items have been designated
• Currently, Federal procurement preference in place for 33 items
• Preference for remaining nine items effective this October … but there’s no need to wait!
• Over 4,500 products represented
• Many products used in:
– Construction
– Food service
– Custodial dervices
– Operations and maintenance
13
Designated Items: Construction
14
Product Category Min. Content Product Category Min.
Content Carpets 7% Hydraulic Fluids Chain and Cable Lubricants 77% Mobile Equipment 44% Composite Panels Stationary Equipment 44%
Acoustical 37% Industrial Cleaners 41% Interior 55% Metalworking Fluids Plastic Lumber 23% General Purpose 57% Structural Interior 89% High Performance 40% Structural Wall 94% Parts Washing Solution 65%
Concrete and Asphalt Release Fluids
87% Plastic Insulating Foam 7%
Forming Lubricants 68% Roof Coatings 20% Fluid-filled Transformers Water Tank Coatings 59%
Synthetic Ester-based 66% Wood and Concrete Sealers Vegetable Oil-based 95% Membrane Concrete
Sealers 11%
Penetrating Liquids 79%
Designated Items: Food Service
16
Product Category Min.
Content Disposable Containers 72% Disposal Cutlery 48% Food Cleaners 53%
Designated Items: Custodial Services
17
Product Category Min. Content Product Category Min.
Content Adhesive and Mastic Removers
58% Floor Strippers 78%
Bathroom and Spa Cleaners 74% General Purpose Household Cleaners
39%
Carpet and Upholstery Cleaners Glass Cleaners 49% General Purpose 54% Graffiti and Grease
Removers 34%
Spot Remover 7% Laundry Products Films General Purpose 34%
Non-durable 85% Pretreatment/Spot Removers
46%
Semi-durable 45% Multipurpose Cleaners 56%
Designated Items:Operations and Maintenance
18
Product Category Min. Content Product Category Min.
Content 2-Cycle Engine Oils 34% Greases Corrosion Preventatives 53% Food Grade 42% Diesel Fuel Additives 90% Multipurpose 72% Dust Suppresants 85% Other 75% Fertilizers 71% Rail Truck 30% Gear Lubricants 58% Track 77% General Purpose Deicers 93% Penetrating Lubricants 68%
Sorbents 89%
Designated Items: Miscellaneous
19
Product Category Min.
Content Bedding, Bed Linens, and Towels
12%
Firearm Lubricants 49% Hand Cleaners 64% Hand Sanitizers 73% Lip Care Products 82%
Round 6 Proposed Items
20
Category Item Min.
Content Construction and Industrial
Expanded Polystyrene Foam Recycling Products
90%
Food Service Disposable Tablewear 72% Operations and Maintenance
Heat Transfer Fluids 89% Ink Removers and Cleaners 79% Mulch and Compost Cleaners 95% Multipurpose Lubricants 88% Turbine Drip Oils 87%
Miscellaneous Topical Pain Relief Products 91%
Labeling Program
• Voluntary labeling program allows use of BioPreferred logo to identify qualifying biobased products
• Label will apply to productand/or packaging
• Proposed rule published July 2009
• Review and commentperiod and market research completed
• Final rule under preparation
21
Purpose of Label
22
• Expand product use
• Increase availability of information to consumer
• Help manufacturers market biobased products
• Unbiased source and indicator of biobased content
Revising Program Guidelines
• 2008 Farm Bill provisions related to intermediates and feedstocks requires USDA to revise BioPreferred program guidelines
• In addition, program guidelines are five years old and need an overhaul
• Revision strategy– Identify key issues– Hold public meetings to gather input– Publish revisions as proposed rule in
Federal Register– Revise proposed rule based on public
comment and finalize program guidelines23
Program Guideline Key Issue Areas
• Designation of intermediates and feedstocks
• Designation of complex assembly products
• Environmental life-cycle assessment
Note: These three issue areas became the subjects of three public meetings.
24
Intermediates and Feedstocks
• Designate intermediate ingredients and feedstocks used to produce items subject to Federal procurement preference
• Automatically designate items composed of intermediate ingredients and feedstocks
− If content of designated intermediate ingredients and feedstocks exceeds 50% of item
− Unless Secretary determines different percentage is appropriate
25
Intermediates and Feedstocks:Simplified Manufacturing
Process Flow
26
Starch Dextrose Lactic Acid
Bioplastic Polymer
Finished Product
What should we designate?
Intermediates and Feedstocks (con’t.)
27
Starch Dextrose Lactic Acid
Bioplastic Polymer
Finished Product
This is the major intermediate sold in commerce
Intermediates and Feedstocks (con’t.)
28
Unfortunately, the real world is slightly more complicated than our simple example.
Intermediates and Feedstocks (con’t.)
30
And that’s only a simplified representation of the biobased manufacturing industry!
Intermediates and Feedstocks:Key Issues
• What types of materials to designate• How to prioritize the designation of
intermediates and feedstocks• How to design the process whereby
downstream products are automatically designated following the designation of an intermediate or feedstock
Note: Federal government does not generally purchase intermediates and feedstocks.
31
Designating Complex Products
• Complex assembly products are those with multiple components (ex: automobiles, office furniture, mattresses)
• Currently, there are no approved testing methods for determining biobased content of complex products
• Revised guidelines will need to await approved testing methods or determine decision rules for designating complex products based on testing individual components
32
Complex Products:Automobile Biobased
Components
33
Bio-Based Resins
Soy-Based FoamsBio-Fillers in
Plastics
Natural Fiber Reinforced
Plastics
Sustainable Fabrics
Source: Ford Motor Company
Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment
• Farm Bill requires program guidelines “…to provide information as to the … environmental and public health benefits of such materials and items…”
• Existing program guidelines use environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) to provide that information
• LCA examines environmental impacts throughout the product’s life-cycle including manufacturing, use, and end-of-life disposition
34
Environmental LCA (con’t.)
• USDA has adopted Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES) model
• Evaluates impacts for 12 environmental and public health impacts such as global warming and human health, and ecological toxicity
• Integrates impacts into a single score based upon a predetermined weighting scheme
• Methodology is comprehensive and accepted in scientific circles
35
BEES Concerns• Expensive
• Difficult for the procurement community to understand
• Produces a score that only has meaning in comparison to other products that have been evaluated
• BEES scores are not factored into the designation process
• Bottom line: benefits may not be commensurate with costs
Key LCA issue: Is there a better way to do it?
36
FY 2010 BioPreferred Timeline
37
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Program Guidelines
Public Meetings
Final Labeling Rule Published
in Fed.Reg.
GSA Expo/ BioPreferred
Training
Actual date
Estimated date
Proposed Round 6 Rule Published in
Fed.Reg.
Proposed Round 7 Rule Published in
Fed.Reg.
FinalRound 5 Rule Published in
Fed.Reg.
Oct Nov Dec Sep
Revised Draft
Program Guidelines
For Further Information:
• Jeff Goodman, Departmental Management, Environmental Management Division [email protected], (202) 401-4747
• Ron Buckhalt, Departmental Management, Environmental Management Division [email protected], (202) 205-4008
• Steve Devlin, Iowa State University, [email protected], (641) 613-3298
• Website: http://www.biopreferred.gov38