Grundtvig learning partnership project „ „ EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES...
-
Upload
simone-biby -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Grundtvig learning partnership project „ „ EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES...
Grundtvig learning partnership project
„ EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES ON RAISING SOCIAL COMPETENCIES OF OFFENDERS”
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
MADRID(6-11 th May 2013)
MEETING EVALUATION
Team Coordinator Assessment
Number of participants: 6
Focus on 4 themes:
1) Communication among the partners
2) Activities
3) Mobilty
4) Involvement of local Community
1) Communications among the partners
• All the coordinators shared informations with partners
• All the groups shared informations via e-mail
• Group meetings were made weekly or close to the deadlines.
2) Activities
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Exchange of mate-rial
Laboratory activi-ties
On field work
Study/research
Social/cultural ac-tivities
Meetings of Work-ing Group
Conference
Seminars
Number of Groups per activity made
The only two activities which should be improved are ‘’Study/Research’’ and ‘’On Field Work’’
The main problems to cope with for the team.Item/Grade of problem
Low Medium High Very high
a) Lack of time 2 4 0 0b) Lack of human resources
1 5 0 0
c) Lack of competencies
5 0 1 0
d) Problems in coordination
4 1 1 0
e) Financial problems
2 3 1 0
f) Administrative problems
5 1 0 0
Maybe the only problems for the team were ‘’Lack of time and human resources’’ and ‘’Financial problems’’
3) Mobility
What grade of difficulty will your group face in order to accomplish the programmed mobility activities?
Most of the groups answered the group would have had no problems in facing the mobilty activities.
ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL PROBLEMS THE GROUP COULD FACE:
Problems in mobility
There were no real problems in mobility
Item/Grade of problem
Low Medium High Very high
a) Lack of time 3 2 1 0
b) Lack of human resources
4 0 2 0
c) Lack of competencies
6 0 0 0
d) Problems in coordination
4 2 0 0
e) Financial problems
6 0 0 0
f) Administrative problems
4 0 2 0
Preparatory activities for mobility
0 1 2 3 4 5 6Coordination activities
Production of material/documents/
reports
Laboratory activities
On field work
Study/research
Social/cultural activities
Meetings of Working Group
Conference
Seminars
Number of groups
4) Involvement of local Community
In this part of the questionnaire the focus was on the organizations of each country,
involved in the making of this project.
Commitment for each institutionOrganizations No Commitment Low
CommitmentHigh Commitment
Very High Commitment
Local government 0 0 6 0
Other similar organizations
0 4 2 0
Research Institutes/Universities
4 0 2 0
Organizations of third sector
1 5 0 0
Enterprises 5 1 0 0
The local government and other similar organizations were the most involved.
In particular they gave their contribution to the ‘’implementation of the activities’’ and to the
‘’organization of events’’.
Satisfaction Assessment Number of participants: 15
• It concerned general informations about the meeting in Spain and the satisfaction about some aspects of the meeting
• Section 1: General informations about the meeting• Section 2: Satisfaction of participants
1) General informations about the meeting
The first part of the questionnaire investigated the intensity of the
activities presented during the meeting
Educational trips
Exchange of material
Laboratory activities
On field work
On desk Study/research
Social/cultural activities
Conference
Seminars
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Intensity of activities
High Intensive Intensive Less Intensive None
• The highest intensity was for ‘’Educational trips’’, ‘’Social/Cultural activities’’ and ‘’On desk study/Research’’
• We should have improved the intensity of ‘’Laboratory activities’’ and ‘’On field work’’
2) Satisfaction of Participants
This part of the questionnaire focused on the satisfaction upon:
• Project Coordinator
• Meeting Coordinator
• Team Leader
Planning activities
Key Partnership relations
Capacity to manage on-going process
Transparency with regards to aims
Involving groups by developing open dialogue
Ability to lead the argumentative stage
Capacity to understand specific needs
Empathy demonstrated
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Satisfaction with Project Coordinator
Very satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied
The satisfaction, in this case, is pretty high for all the items, apart from the ‘’Involvement of the groups’’ and the ‘’Trasparency on aims’’
Logistics
Materials/documents provided
ICT instruments provided
Key partnership relations developed and implemented
Transparency with regard to aims and activities
Involving group by developing open dialogue
Ability to lead the argumentative stage
Capacity to understand specific needs
Empathy Demonstrated
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Satisfaction with Meeting Coordinator
Very Satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied
Regarding the Madrid Meeting Coordinator, almost all the participants were fully satisfied with ‘’Logistics’’, ‘’Group Involvement’’, ‘’Key partnership relations development’ and‘’Materials provided’’
Direction provided in order to develop and accomplish the meeting
Motivation and support provided for the workgroup
Transparency with regard to aims and activities
Involving the group by developing open dialogue and empowerment
Activities and commitment distributed equally among the staff
Understand specific needs
Empathy demonstrated
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Satisfaction with Team Leader
Very Satisfied Satisfied Not satisfied Not at all satisfied
The results of this schedule didn’t show any critic points regarding the team leaders
SummaryTeam Coordinator:
• More Study/Research and on field work
• Main problems for the group: Lack of time and human resources/ Financial problems
To improve:• On field work• Involvement of the groups by
developing open dialogue• Trasparency on aims
Team coordinator:
• Perfect comunications among the partners
• No real problems for the group
• No problems in mobility
• Good preparation for mobility
• High involvement of Local Government and Organizations
Satisfaction:
• Educational trips, Social/cultural activities, On desk study/research
• Satisfaction with the Project Coordinator
• High Satisfaction with the Team Leaders
• High Satisfaction with the Madrid Meeting Organization
Thank you
Ministry of Justice PRAP Campania