Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors
description
Transcript of Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors
![Page 1: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
04/22/23 1
Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across
sectors
Presentation to ICRIERSeptember 28, 2004
![Page 2: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
04/22/23 2
Are there common lessons from the experiences of policy reform?
MacroeconomicExternal policiesPrivatizationFinancial sector
![Page 3: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
04/22/23 3
Three common lessons
Policy reform generally had the magnitude of impact expected—”growth” expectations were too highGetting rid of discretion is too high a price to pay—but properly exercised discretion is difficult to achieveExpectations are central
![Page 4: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
04/22/23 4
Three implications for policy making
Common principles, heterogeneity of implementationFocus on initiating and sustaining episodes of rapid growthPro-active actions of government have to be scaled to capacity
![Page 5: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
04/22/23 5
“Growth” is nearly always a transitional phenomena, differences in “steady state” growth are small
![Page 6: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
04/22/23 6
Micro-economists were generally right about direction and magnitude of the impact of policy reform: Trade
Most estimates of the impact of tariff reform are a few percent of GDP, with small associated “growth” impactsThe output gain increases with the square of the distortion Discretionary restrictions (without effective secondary markets) can have huge losses
![Page 7: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
04/22/23 7
What is to be done about discretion?
Diagnosis of the 1990s
Attempts to limit discretion in policy making
Lessons from the experience
![Page 8: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
04/22/23 8
Diagnosis pre-1990s: Discretion is the problem
Inadequate information led to erroneous decisions,Insufficient (and overstretched) technical capacity to take correct decisions,Multiple objectives led to ineffective actions,Policy actions were politicized in a way that led to sacrifice of effectiveness for political expediency (e.g. “populism”),Inadequate incentives for public sector officials to be dynamic or to innovate.Outright corruption
![Page 9: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
04/22/23 9
The diagnostic pre-1990s: illustration with Central Banks
Rationale for public sector intervention
Symptoms of excessive discretion
Attempts to limit discretion
Regulate money supply, FEX
“printing money” to finance deficits
Independent Central BanksTied exchange rates (currency boards)
![Page 10: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
04/22/23 10
Three ways to limit discretion of government
Move activities into the market (privatize, deregulate)Pursue “rules based” regulation by “independent” or “autonomous” bodiesEnter into binding international agreements
![Page 11: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Feasible PolicyActions (The set of actions A that the policy making organization can take)
Citizen organizing capability
Background Institutions
Relevant “States of the World”(empirically contingent “facts” that are relevant to the desirability of various policy actions--S)
Notional Policy-Objectives with discretion-Conditional rules (A mapping from “states of the the world” to “policy actions”)-Unconditional rules (always do policy action a).
Organization
(The organizations or agencies legally authorized to take actions)
Policy Actions
(The outcome of all of this is the actual sequence of decisions and policy actions taken)
Background Institutions of policy making
AdministrativeJudicial
Political(Executive, Legislative)
Impact of policy action on actions of relevant agents
Outcomes
Model(description of how policy actions lead to outcomesM)
Free Press
Figure 7.2: The elements of policy action
![Page 12: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
04/22/23 12
Lessons from the “limit discretion” movement
With weak “background” institutions rules and discretion are identicalEliminating discretion is like squeezing a balloon—it just changes shapeBoth tied and untied hands have their dangers
![Page 13: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
04/22/23 13
Key role of expectations
A “policy” is a sequence of future policy actions which depends on “states of the world”Investors/entrepreneurs respond to expected profitability Hence, anything can happen, depending on how current policy actions affect anticipated future actions
![Page 14: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
04/22/23 14
Key role of expectations: Examples
Modest reforms can have enormous growth impacts—if they are the harbinger of future reformsEnormous policy action changes can have no impact—if they are perceived as temporary“Digging deeper” can have perverse impactsWith credibility the direction of effects can be reversed (e.g. Chile and deficits)
![Page 15: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
04/22/23 15
Implication 1: Common principles, heterogeneity of implementation
“Institutions” cannot matter
“Institutions” are all important
Both are true
![Page 16: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
04/22/23 16
Implication 2: Initiating and sustaining episodes of rapid growth
Growth is about confident belief that output will be much higher in the future
What current actions will convince investors (small, large) that output will be double in ten years?
![Page 17: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
04/22/23 17
Implication 3: Actions have to be scaled to capacity
There are no arguments in principle in favor of limiting discretion of governmentIt all depends on the capacity to exercise discretion productively
Improving that capacity is centralIf you don’t have it, you shouldn’t do it
![Page 18: Growth in the 1990s: Common lessons across sectors](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062323/56815a33550346895dc7727b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
04/22/23 18
The wrong debates
Is activist industrial policy good or bad?Is free trade better than use of trade as an instrument?Should country regulate banking or have public sector banks?Should utilities be private or public?