Group discussions
description
Transcript of Group discussions
![Page 1: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Group discussions
1st Advisory Council MeetingDehradun 01/06/2012
Nils Teufel
MilkIT
![Page 2: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2/35
Group discussions1. Innovation platforms:– “How can innovation platforms support development and
dissemination of new technologies for dairy development?”– Himmothan, GBPIHED, Elks, AHD
2. Marketing constraints:– “What are you most interested in for overcoming institutional and
marketing constraints in the dairy sector?”– Aanchal, Ajeeveeka, ULDB, Chirag
3. Feeding constraints:– “What should MilkIT produce to help with improving productivity
of dairy animals among small holders through better feeding, breeding & health?”
– GBPUAT, FD, VPKAS01/06/2012
![Page 3: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3/35
Grp 1: Innovation platforms
01/06/2012
M. Chauhan (Himmothan)R.S. Negi (Anim Husb Dep)
R.S. Rawat (GBPIHED) S. Jarial (ILRI – ELKS)R.C. Rajaguru (For Dep)
![Page 4: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4/35
Grp1 Innovation platforms• Value of innovation platforms
– Contribute by bringing in technologies, pilot them, scale it up– By creating platform at different levels, knowledge sharing at right levels– By creating awareness, demonstration wider audience, feedback, knowledge
documentation– Difficulties & risk:– Sustainability, ownership, scope – Compendium of successful experiences– Malavika: Ownership for sustainability (who owns)– Negi: What about the costs for maintaining platform– Malavika: which scale?
block level officers/ paravets/ ext. workers don’t talk to each other, maybe that would be useful
– NGOs do talk to each other– Padma: what is the actual income contribution of milk, what can actually be improved
through more milk
01/06/2012
Most important
![Page 5: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5/35
Additional input on innovation platforms (later)
• Padma: expand the innovation platforms to include other actors who work in different fields (e.g. breeding, health, small ruminants etc.). Offer the platform as a useful and efficient approach to get collaboration & knowledge exchange going.
• Malavika: Support communication between local government officials and practitioners. They have only few opportunities for exchange.
01/06/2012
![Page 6: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6/35
Grp 2: Inst. & mrktng constraints
01/06/2012
Atul Shah(CHIRAG)
Pankaj Kumar (For Dep)
Pawan Kumar(Ajeevika-IFAD)
A.K. Negi(UCDF-Aanchal)
![Page 7: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7/35
Grp 2: Institutional constraints• Baseline survey
– Market research (Milk production groups)• demand/supply gap• production, status/potential
Tiwari: consider own consumption requirements (nutritional security)Others: but we are just talking about selling surplus
• Awareness of group formation– Benefits– Approach (evaluation of form of organisational structure)– Business plan (economics of group activities for sustainability)
Malavika: Use federations to market more products.Pawan: Develop a variety of successful business models; MilkIT can bring together knowledge of successful innovations, compendium (specific examples)
– Marketing– Incentives
• Capacity building– NGOS can be roped in
01/06/2012
Most important
![Page 8: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8/35
Grp2: Marketing constraints• Infrastructure
– cold-storage/chain– collection points (suggestions for linking remote villages)
• Value addition (Amul example)(Lepcha: think of cheese as in Sikkim)(Malavika: Minimum amount is so low that any processing is difficult, starting dairies with 50l/d) as soon as area is increased, transport becomes too expensive)
• Pricing (amount, quality)• Identification of markets• Collection process• Standardisation• Up-scaling
01/06/2012
Most important
![Page 9: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9/35
Grp 3: Feed constraints
01/06/2012
V. Padmakumar (ILRI-ELKS)T. Ravichandran (ILRI-MilkIT)
S.T.S. Lepcha (For Dep)T.P. Tiwari (GBPUAT)
J.K. Bisht (VPKAS)
![Page 10: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10/35
Grp 3: Feed constraints• Feeding
– Choice of fodder • For lean period (Apr-Jun, Dec-Feb)• Fodder trees (Bhimal, oak)• Perennial grasses (broom, napier, congo)
– Dual purpose crops: wheat, barley, paddy (suitability), depends on area– Use of weeds (Natal grass?)– Improvement of existing feeds
• Urea treatment, UMB, suppl green fodder, concentrates, suppl with area specific minerals– Reduce wastage/feeding– Fodder banks (Negi: GoU is putting fodder banks in each block)
• Breeding– cross-breeding– red. calving interval– red. AFC
• Health– Deworming, ext. parasites– Promotion of EVM (ethnoveterinary system)– Vaccination (FMD, HS) (Negi: cold chain); Negi: improve evidence-based veterinary services, not effectively
targeted, also information links (helpline).
01/06/2012
Most important
![Page 11: Group discussions](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/568161d8550346895dd1e026/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11/35
Chairman’s conclusions
–Milk animals (5l milk/d)
– Tea animals (1l milk/d)
– Dung animals (no milk/d)
01/06/2012
• In livestock development, we should consider the requirements and opportunities of 3 animal types: