Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

8
Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings Sara Gharabaghli Rebecca Krogstad Sara Lynch Sophia Saavedra Tamara Wright

description

Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings. Sara Gharabaghli Rebecca Krogstad Sara Lynch Sophia Saavedra Tamara Wright. Introduction. Hypothesis Significance Similar Studies. Methods. Results. Discussion. Purpose Our study Limitations Further studies. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

Page 1: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

Ground Reaction Force:

Dominant vs. Non Dominant

Single Leg LandingsSara Gharabaghli

Rebecca Krogstad

Sara LynchSophia Saavedra

Tamara Wright

Page 2: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

IntroductionHypothesis

Significance

Similar Studies

Page 3: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

Methods

Page 4: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

Results

1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Force Comparison Between Right Leg Step Off and Left Leg Step Off

RLSOLLSOMeanStandard Deviation

Subject ID

Gro

und

Reac

tion

Forc

e (N

)

Page 5: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

20

40

60

80

100

120

Leg Stiffness

Left LegRight Leg

Subject ID

Nm

1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 1005

1015202530354045

Left Knee vs. Right Knee Angle At Landing

Left KneeRight Knee

Subject ID

Angl

e In

Deg

rees

Page 6: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

30.5 36.1 31.7 28.8 29.8 37.8 40.3 22.5 25.30

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Right Leg Knee Angle vs. Peak Force

Knee Angle in Degrees

Peak

For

ce (

N)

38.7 31.0 38.5 30.7 21.7 34.2 39.7 28.0 30.7 41.7 43.8 41.1 44.9 56.8 51.2 48.9 56.1 45.20

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Left Leg Knee Angle vs. Peak Force

Knee Angle in Degrees

Peak

For

ce (

N)

Page 7: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

DiscussionPurpose

Our studyLimitations

Further studies

Page 8: Ground Reaction Force: Dominant vs. Non Dominant Single Leg Landings

References Brown T.N. , McLean S.G. , Palmieri-Smith R.M. (2013). Associations Between Lower Limb

Muscle Activation Strategies and Resultant Multi-planar Knee Kinetics During Single Leg Landings. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 1-6

Fong, C. , Blackburn, J. , Norcross, M. , McGrath, M. , & Padua, D. (2011). Ankle-Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics. Journal of Athletic Training, 46(1), 5-10.

Podraza, J. T., & White, S. C. (2010) Effect of knee flexion angle on ground reaction forces, knee moments and muscle co-contraction during an impact-like deceleration landing: Implications for the non-contact mechanism of ACL injury. The Knee, 17, 291-295.

Schmitz, R. , Kulas, A. , Perrin, D. , Riemann, B. , & Shultz, S. (2007). Sex Differences in Lower Extremity Biomechanics During Single Leg Landings. Clinical Biomechanics, 22(6), 681-688.

Van Der Harst, J.J. , Gokeler, A, . & Hof, A. L. (2007). Leg Kinematics and Kinetics in Landing from A Single-leg Hop for Distance: A Comparison Between Dominant and Non-Dominant Leg. Clinical Biomechanics 22, 674-680.

Wang, L. (2011). The Lower Extremity Biomechanics of Single- and Double-leg stop-jump Tasks. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 10(1), 151-156.