Ground-based Radar Interferometry...The IBIS-S sensor detects the position and the displacement of...
Transcript of Ground-based Radar Interferometry...The IBIS-S sensor detects the position and the displacement of...
Ground-based Radar Interferometry
C.I. di Tecniche Diagnostiche e Materiali per l’Architettura Modulo di Diagnostica Fisica delle Costruzioni
A.A. 2014-2015
Dott. Sergio Vincenzo Calcina Contatti: [email protected] - 3318582016
The IBIS-S sensor detects the position and the displacement of target points placed at different distances from the equipment using two well-known radar techniques:
1. the Stepped-Frequency Continuous Waves (SF-CW) technique, adopted to resolve the scenario in the range direction, i.e. to detect the position in range of different targets placed along the radar line of sight LOS;
2. the Interferometric technique, implemented to compute the displacement of each target comparing the phase information of the back-scattered electromagnetic waves collected at different times.
Theoretical Background of the radar technique
GBR Interferometry
SFCW technique is based on the transmission of sweep consisting of a series N monochromatic electromagnetic pulses of Ttone duration (Continuous Waves) at different frequencies (Stepped Frequency).
Δf= frequency step
f0
f1=f0+ Δf
f2= f1+ Δf = f0 + 2Δf
fn=f0 + n Δf
Stepped-Frequency Continuous Waves (SF-CW) technique
GBR Interferometry
The transmitted SFCW signal:
At the end of a sweep IBIS-S system has acquired a vector of complex numbers that corresponds to a frequency sampling of the observed scenario.
Sweep duration
Ttone
f0 f0+Df f0+2Df f0+(N-1)Df
Next sweep
t
I0+jQ0 I1+jQ1 I2+jQ2 IN-1+jQN-1
f(t)
GBR Interferometry
Virtual B f [Hz]
n-th frequency
The SFCW technique allows IBIS to obtain the same performance of a synthetic pulse of
duration to which corresponds a range resolution of B
1
F(f)
B
ccR
22D
GBR Interferometry
Range direction: straight direction from IBIS to the target;
Range resolution: capability to distinguish two targets in the range direction;
Range bin: range resolution area.
One-dimensional radar profile
The Stepped Frequency - Continuous Wave technique allows the resolution of
the scenario along range direction independently from the distance.
IBIS Range Resolution up to 0.75 m
GBR Interferometry
The interferometric analysis provides data on object displacement by comparing phase information, collected in different time periods, of reflected waves from the object.
The IBIS sensor is able to evaluate the displacement for each range-bin resolved by mean of SFCW technique.
Time-Frequency Duality
GBR Interferometry
The phase ambiguity bounds the maximum displacement measurable between two consecutive acquisition to ± λ/4 ≈ 4.38 mm
?
GBR Interferometry
• Maximum distance: 1Km (static surveys), 500 m (dynamic – sampling frequency of 40Hz)
• Maximum sampling frequency: 200 Hz
• One Dimensional radar imaging
• Range resolution: 0.75 m independent from the range
• Measurement of the displacement of the entire scenario at the same time
• Displacement accuracy: up to 0.01mm
IBIS-S radar sensor: capabilities
Ku band system Band of 200 MHz, between 17.1GHz and 17.3 GHz
GBR Interferometry
IBIS-S radar sensor: capabilities
The Ku band IBIS-S system is provided with two identical IBIS-ANT3 antennas operating in vertical polarisation and characterised by a maximum gain of 19dBi.
GBR Interferometry
The displacement is measured in LOS direction (Line Of Sight) target-sensor. To calculate the true displacements: -acquisition geometry; -identification of natural reflectors.
β=LOS angle
GBR Interferometry
Church of San Giacomo e Filippo (1771-1774) - San Giacomo Roncole
This structure was damaged by the earthquakes of 20th and 29th May 2012. The damage consists in a collapse of the top and in many cracks at the base.
GBR Interferometry
Morphology of the southern side. The dashed lines are fractures directly observed by visual inspection and along which the maps show a clear color discontinuity.
By Pesci et al. (2012).
Study of the base where there is a crack extended to the whole horizontal section. The deformation maps show slippage of the body of the bell tower fractured area and to identify clearly the contours.
GBR Interferometry
GBR Interferometry
The IBIS system was configured with the following acquisition parameters:
Antenna type 3 (Gain max = 19 dB);
Survey duration: 10 - 15 min;
Max distance Rmax: 75 - 100 m;
Distance resolution ΔR: 0.75 m;
Sampling frequency: 56.09 Hz.
GBR Interferometry
Scenario - Location St02
Scenario -Location St01
Scenario - Location St03
GBR Interferometry
Interometric Data Processing:
1) Radar pixel selection: selection of the echoes characterized by better signal to noise ratio, attributable to reflections from structural and decorative details of the building, such as eaves, arches and balustrades and other natural back-scatterers.
The identification of the different back-scatterers points on the structure was performed taking account of the range bin in which is included the peak selected (i.e. the distance between the point and the sensor) and the position and inclination of the radar antenna respect to the base of the tower.
GBR Interferometry
Step 1: interpretetation of the echos
Reflection point on the structure
Radar configuration St2 Horizontal distance 23 m
Central LOS angle 30°
GBR Interferometry
Step 2: Frequency Domain Decomposition method (Brincker et al. 2001)
The FDD shows a frequency response recognizable to about 0.96 Hz, obtained by integrating over 15 minutes of acquisition
Top
Base
Frequency analysis of the natural oscillations induced by the wind and the other sources of random vibrations
GBR Interferometry
Comparison between the time-series at the several floors of the building
ttf 96.02sin15.0)(
GBR Interferometry
Vibration time history and frequency analysis of the tower (55th range bin)
Fourier Domain (f0=0.96 Hz)
Time Domain
f=0.96 Hz
f=0.96 Hz
GBR Interferometry
IBIS-S configuration St01
52nd range bin shows further frequency peaks, probably related to the asymmetrical distribution of the loads within the structure or in the top of the building.
GBR Interferometry
IBIS-S configuiration St03
Effect produced by the vibrations of the cable – 22nd range bin
GBR Interferometry
First experimental mode shape (eigen-frequency 0.96 Hz)
Displacement projected in the horizontal direction
GBR Interferometry
Several empirical relationships available to estimate the
fundamental frequency of masonry structures provide
results in the range between 1.4 and 1.5 Hz.
Italian Code (NTC-08):
Spanish Code (NSCE-02):
Linear relationship proposed by Faccio et al. (2010):
Rainieri et al. (2012):
The significant difference (31-36%) between the
experimental value and the estimated values could be
imputed to the damage caused by the earthquake. It is
generally recognised that the period of vibration grows
while increasing the mass of the vibrating system and while
reducing the stiffness.
GBR Interferometry
Finite Element Model: comparison between the period of vibration of the tower before the earthquake (not damaged condition) and obtained experimentally on the structure damaged.
Finite Element Model Subdomain Setting
Young modulus 2800 MPa
Density 1800 Kg/m3
Poisson ratio 0.2
GBR Interferometry
GBR Interferometry
Mode 1: 1.22 Hz – simple bending (X direction)
GBR Interferometry
Mode 2: 1.23 Hz – simple bending (Y direction)
GBR Interferometry
Mode 3: 5.64 Hz – bending (XY direction)
GBR Interferometry
Mode 4: 5.64 Hz – bending (YX direction)
GBR Interferometry
Mode 5: 6.22 Hz – first torsional
GBR Interferometry
Mode 5: 6.22 Hz – first torsional
GBR Interferometry
Mode 6: 9.89 Hz
GBR Interferometry
Mode 7: 11.99 Hz
GBR Interferometry
Mode 8: 12.09 Hz - bending
GBR Interferometry
Mode 9: 12.12 Hz - bending
GBR Interferometry
Mode 10: 15.23 Hz - torsional
6. GBR Interferometry – Principi e applicazioni
Image by Interferometric Survey
Characterisation of natural and compulsory vibrations
Monitoring of Pisa Tower
6. GBR Interferometry – Principi e applicazioni
ACQUISITION : GEOMETRY and PARAMETRES
Plan view of the area with the four positions of measure
A B C D
DISTANCE TOWER [m] 30.3 25.3 26.3 27.3
RADAR ELEVATION FORM
THE GROUND [m] 0.60 0.60 0.62 0.61
WIND Weak,
from N-E
Weak,
from N-E
Weak,
from N-E
Weak,
from N-E
ENFORCEMENT ACTION YES NO NO NO
FREQUENCY OF
SAMPLING [Hz] 30 30 30 30
RESOLUTION IN RANGE
[m] 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
MAXIMUM RANGE [m] 200 200 200 200
Operative conditions and configuration of IBIS-S for the four acquisitions
GBR Interferometry
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS - POSITION A
Power profile – selection of measuring points
A
TOWER
DISTANCE [m] 30.3
HEIGHT RADAR
TO GROUND [m] 0.60
WIND Weak,
from N-E
ENFORCEMENT
ACTION YES
FREQUENCY OF
SAMPLING [Hz] 30
RESOLUTION IN
RANGE [m] 0.5
MAXIMUM
RANGE [m] 200
It’s important to distinguish between peak power on metal scaffolding and those really belonging to the structure
GBR Interferometry
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS - POSITION A, POINTS 5, 11
Natural vibration induced by the wind and the random movement of people – Results obtained in the time and frequency domain
PUNTO 5 PUNTO 11
6. GBR Interferometry – Principi e applicazioni
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS - POSITION A, POINT 11
Vibration induced by the coordinated movement of twenty people placed on top of the tower (results obtained in time and frequency domain)
During stress forced the displacement component orthogonal structure takes a sinusoidal with fundamental frequency f0 = 1Hz and maximum amplitude peak-peak equal to 0.60 mm
1 Hz1 Hz1 Hz1 Hz
GBR Interferometry
45
ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS - POSITION A, POINT 5
Vibration induced by the coordinated movement of twenty people placed on top of the tower – Results obtained in time and frequency domain
During stress forced the displacement component orthogonal structure takes a sinusoidal with fundamental frequency f0 = 1Hz and maximum amplitude peak-peak equal to 0.34 mm
GBR Interferometry
ANALYSIS of RESULTS - POSITION D
D
TOWER
DISTANCE [m] 27.3
HEIGHT RADAR
TO GROUND [m] 0.61
WIND Weak,
from N-E
ENFORCEMENT
ACTION NO
FREQUENCY OF
SAMPLING [Hz] 30
RESOLUTION IN
RANGE [m] 0.5
MAXIMUM
RANGE [m] 200
Frequency analysis of natural vibrations induced by the wind and the random movement of people
GBR Interferometry
ANALYSIS of RESULTS - POSITION D
Frequency analysis of natural vibrations induced by the wind and the random movement of people: first modal shape.
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.325
30
35
40
45
50
55
Horizontal displacement [mm]
Str
uct
ure
ran
ge
[m]
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
x 10-3
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Horizontal displacement [mm]
Str
uct
ure
ran
ge
[m]
Passive survey Forced survey
11 11
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
GBR Interferometry