GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner:...

7
GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy

Transcript of GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner:...

Page 1: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

GRI NW Transparency

StockholmStakeholder Group Conference

26 November 2009

Martin CrouchPartner: European Strategy

Page 2: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

2

Progress update

• Storage transparency– Daily information on storage volume, inflows and outflows– Go-live 1 October– Completion 1 December 2009

• Transmission transparency– Phase one completed 9 June 2009 – wrap up– Next steps for 2010

Page 3: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

3

Storage transparency

• Gas Storage Europe commitment for early implementation (3 months)

• GRI NW regulators will monitor and report on progress

• Example of daily update:

Page 4: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

4

GRI NW

COUNTRY Germany Great Britain France Denmark Belgium Netherlands

Storage System Operator

BEB Speicher GmbH

Centrica Storengy DONG Storage Fluxys NAM

E.ON Gas Storage GmbH

 SSE/Statoil   Energinet.dk   TAQA

RWE Dea AG EDF Energy Gasunie

EWE Aktiengesellschaft

 National Grid LNG

    Essent

Bayerngas GmbH Scottish Power

VerbundnetzGas AG

 Petronas    

Exxonmobil GD GmbH

RWE Gasspeicher GmbH

    Total StorageCurrent

SnapshotExpected

E.ON Hanse AG   BCM 35.5 24.5 34.9

WINGAS GmbH % of total 68% 86% (96%)

Storage project - snapshot

Published Expected 1 December

Page 5: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

5

Transmission phase one: status

E.ON GT

Fluxys

Svenska

Kraftnät

RWE TNG

National

GridIUK

Gas-link

WIN-GAS

OntrasGRT-gaz

Energinet.dk

Gasunie DT

DEPSwede

gasGRT-

gaz DTGTS BBL

(C1) Max technical capacity

in place

in place

 in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place in place in placein place

in place

in place

in place

(C2) Interruption in place

in place

 in place

in place

in place

 in place

in place

In place

in place

in place in place in placein place

in place

in place

(C3) Daily commercial firm and interruptible capacity

in place

in place

 in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place in place in placein place

in place

in place

in place

(F1) Daily flow / aggregated Allocation

in place

in place

 in place

in place

in place

in place

In place

In place

in place

In place in place in placein place

in place

in place

In place

(F2) Daily prompt allocation information

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place in place in place  in place

in place

in place

(F3) Daily aggregate day-ahead nominations

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

In place

In place

In place

May2009 - Delay

Dec 2009

Dec 2009

 Dec 2009

in place

Dec 2009

(F4) Historic gas flow information database

in place

in place

 in place

in place

in place

in place

in place

In place

in place

in place in place in placein place

in place

in place

In place

Number of IPs 22 19 1 5 8 4 1 8 3 9 6 7 2 1 5 25 43 minus rule IPs 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0

TSOs report published Specific date Less than three shippers   Not committed to dateNot applicable

GRTGaz published July - WINGAS published October 2009 (96% compliant)

Page 6: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

6

Transmission transparency next steps

• Developments since phase 1:– New third package requirements– Network users’ “minimum transparency requirements”– Expectation of European Commission’s comitology proposals

• Last Stakeholder group invited TSOs to bring forward proposals based on new requirements

• GTE+ made proposals for pan-EU implementation

• Debate has moved to EU level; comitology proposals welcome– Additional regional work must have clear value-added– Don’t see value debating interpretation of minimum requirements of

third package

• Door still open for more ambitious proposals from TSOs

Page 7: GRI NW Transparency Stockholm Stakeholder Group Conference 26 November 2009 Martin Crouch Partner: European Strategy.

7