Greg Volk [email protected] Extraordinary Technology Conference July 31, 2011.
50
Knots, Topology and Quanta Greg Volk [email protected] Extraordinary Technology Conference July 31, 2011
Transcript of Greg Volk [email protected] Extraordinary Technology Conference July 31, 2011.
Toroids, Vortices, Knots, Topology
and Quanta Greg Volk
Extraordinary Technology Conference
July 31, 2011
Who is Greg Volk?1. Attended Stanford 1979-
19842. Electrical engineering /
physics3. OCR, CAD software, stock
broker, music arranger, mortgage and real estate broker, landlord, investor
4. Christian / young earth creationist
Goals of This TalkWhy are toroids & vortices
primary?
Define energy, ether, mass, zero point
Connect circuits to quanta & topology
Introduce toroidal coordinates
Discuss toroid knots & other knots
Display the “strobe effect” model
Russ McGlennwww.tccsa.tc/adventure/
Charles W. “Bill” Lucas, Jr.
David L. Bergman
Common Sense Science
www.commonsensescience.org
Spinning Charged Ring
Hydrogen Molecule
CSS Physical Models
CSS Accomplishments• Predicts known properties of electron and proton
• Predicts properties of neutron, hydrogen and higher
• Uses known laws to establish stable, finite structures
• Provides physical meaning for constants e, c and h
• Explains wave/particle and mass/energy dualities
• Takes into account “coupling” or “mutual” energies
• Supports a vortex-based understanding of physics
• Electrodynamic derivation of gravity
Bergman Neutron Model
David L. Bergman, “Notions of a Neutron”, Foundations of Science, Vol. 4, No. 2, 11 pages (2001) http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/neutrons.pdf.
• Can a whole be LESS than a sum of parts?• WHERE is the mutual energy?• Isn’t all energy ultimately “mutual”?• ….• What IS energy anyway?• Does “coupling” relate to “entanglement”?• Does it relate to entropy or temperature?
Profound Questions
“Space is not nothing, or the mere location of bodies and forces, but a medium capable of supporting the strains of electric and magnetic forces. The energies of the world are not localized in the particles from which these forces arose, but rather are to be found in the space surrounding them.”
-- Michael Faraday
“It is mainly with the hope of making Faraday's ideas the basis of a mathematical method that I have undertaken this treatise.”
-- James Clerk MaxwellTreatise on Electricityand Magnetism, 1873
Like elements of charge (matter) repel
Attraction from motion: Ampère / Bernoulli
Fluid through a stream or pipe
Velocity as channel area
Narrow stream in sink / waterfall
Parallel currents attract (Ampère)
The Source of Attraction
Ernst Mach, George Berkeley, Aristotle
"Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe."
- Stephan Hawking, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (1973).
Matter there influences motion here.
Motion is with respect to matter.
- Not space itself, not observer
Mach’s Principle
Imagine an element of matter.
Is it moving? With respect to what?
- If space, by what mechanism?
- If observer, in what frame?
If matter, then all other matter must actually BE present at that location.
Can matter be present where it is not?
Machian Gedanken-Experiment
It depends on the definition of ‘matter’.
To exert its influence elsewhere, matter must possess ‘fields’.
If an element’s field is inseparable from it (permanently attached), then it is actually present throughout all space.
Then all forces are ‘local contact forces’.
Yes! … and No
• Field: the influence a localized element of matter exerts at other points (D & H)• Energy density: interaction of an element’s fields with the total field ( ): ether• Energy: sum (integral) of all densities.• Mass: energy as “resistance to motion”.
-The greater an object’s “internal energy”, the less it is influenced from without.
Definitions
D E B H
• The ratio of a whole to the sum of its parts
• Mathematically • In physics, A and B are fields, scaled by k.• Temperature: a measure of mutual energy
• Mathematically• Take away all interaction energy and get
• ZERO POINT ENERGY!
Entropy & Zero Point Energy
2 2 2A B A B
2 2 2 2A B A B AB
200 years ago, “heat” was a “thing” – caloric
- But it measures relative translational motion
Today “light” is still regarded as a “thing”
- But it measures relative rotational motion
Objects have “energy” by their “relationship” with other objects – in position and motion
ENERGY IS NOT A THING!
Energy is RELATIONSHIP
Experiments - Eric Laithwaite, Bruce de Palma
Theories - Dennis Allen, Paramahamsa Tewari
My derivation:
Independently derived by Ajay Sharma
Mass is Relational/Rotational
2E mc
Boyd Bushman (Bill Alek) magnet drop
Is magnetism related to rotation? Absolutely!
Fundamental particles have magnetic moments
Why? Because they consist of charged circuits
Magnetism results from the circulation or rotation of matter.
Newton’s 3rd Law for continua => circuits
Mass is Magnetic
Return to the element of matter
It is part of a part of a part (divisibility)
Can it move in isolation? No.
-Each infinitesimal element follows another
Can a string of elements move forever? No.
- Sooner or later the moving path returns
Circuits are fundamental!
Why Circuits?
The Greeks, Kepler, Descartes, Leibniz, Swedenbourg, Bošković, Ampère, Kelvin
Planck’s “resonators” began quantum theory
Parson, Compton, Bostick, Krafft, Tewari, Bergman, Lucas, Ginzburg, Kanarev, Sarg
Physical, finite models
Obeys the laws of electrodynamics
The History of Vortex Theory
Circuits are finite groups
-- Comprised of a collection of elements
Rotation & expansion - group phenomena
Even though the elements comprising circuits are continuous, circuits are finite
Particles exist BECAUSE circuits are primary
The Reason for Quanta
Interactions are quantized, too!
Balance between natural repulsion & attraction due to motion => Equilibria
Instantaneous Energy State Energy
Particles expand, contract, translate & rotate continuously about quantum states
The Concept of “State”
Mathematics deriving states from continua
Magnetic memory
Aka “hysteresis”
Multiple solutions
Bifurcation (Thom)
Catastrophe machines
Catastrophe Theory
The Free Energy Catastrophe
“Harry Popper”
Twirly tube demonstration
Blow hard as you like, bugles produce only multiples of a fundamental frequency
Frequencies depend on a bugle’s geometry
The same with fundamental particles!
Except that states may be integer fractions of the fundamental
More About “States”
Always from the interaction of frequencies
Wagon wheels on an old western
Roulette wheels in Las Vegas
Lissajous patterns, Rods
Science Museum toy
ALL vortices have a “return” (Davidson, p. 13)
If all particles are circuits, having inertial frequencies, is the strobe effect fundamental?
The Strobe Effect
Fundamental Energy Chart
Individual(Electricity)
Group(Magnetism)
Appollonian Circles
Faraday’s Lines of Force
Poles don’t occur singly, but in conjugate pairs
True circuit nature of field or flow lines
For every positive, a negativefor every emission, an absorptionfor every action, a reactionfor every explosion, an implosionfor every out, an in; for every up, a downfor every yang, a yinfor every male, a female
Why Bipolar?
Bipolar Coordinates
22 2x z
2 22hr a h
2 22hz a 2 22Rx a
2 2 2R a r
hzr xr
2Rx hz
cscR a cotr a
cschr a
coth a
2Rx hz a
ˆ ˆtans
sincosec
a
ρ i k
More Nifty Formulas
ˆˆ cosin sin cos
cos
s1ˆ ˆcos sin si1 ncos cos
e ie k
coscos ,
sin sin cosc
sin1 coos c co1 sss o
zR
tan
nsin
tah
z rx r
Toroidal Coordinates
ˆ ˆ ˆta cos sinse
n tan sincc os
n na
mm
ρ i j k
ˆ ˆ ˆtan cos sins
tan sincosec
a
ρ i j k
mn
m n
Constant gives a fixed torus
Toroid knots from a fixed ratio of to
n = 1, m = 1Villarceau Circles
Trefoil Knot: n = 2, m = 3
Special Toroid Knots
Figure 8 Knot: n = 3, m = 2
Special Toroid Knots
n = 5, m = 12The Rodin Coil
Toroid Model
Toroid Model
Toroid Model
Toroid Model
Toroid Model
3 5
10 35
Multiple Rings
Hopf & Borromean Rings
Tetra Cube
Octa Dod.
More Knots & Topology
“God does not play dice.” -- Albert Einstein
“Stop telling God what to do with his dice. Anyone who is not shocked by quantum theory has not understood a single word. There is no quantum world. There is only an abstract physical description. "It is wrong to think that the task of physics is to find out how nature is. Physics only concerns what we can say about nature.”
-- Neils Bohr
Sorry, Neils. Sorry, Werner. Yes, we can.
Elementary particles are no more than unique topological constructs.
Thanks for listening!
Can We Understand Quantum?
