Green fertilizer upcycling from manure: Technological, … · 2016-09-08 · sustainability...
Transcript of Green fertilizer upcycling from manure: Technological, … · 2016-09-08 · sustainability...
Green fertilizer upcycling from manure:Technological, economic and environmental sustainability demonstration
OPEN DAY
Calldetenes, 20th May 2016
2
Areas of expertise:
Design, project, construction and commissioning of environmental
installations:
Anaerobic digestion plants treating all kind of
biodegradable organic compounds.
Treatment and re-use of effluents with a high content in
salts, COD, Nitrogen and Phosphorus.
Aerobic biological treatment of polluted gases.
Development of new technologies to remove/recover nutrients
such as: Nitrogen and Phosphorus.
Development and optimisation of new processes:
I.e: ManureEcoMine Project financed by UE
Activities Ahidra & Colsen
3
Romania- Colsen van den Hul VOF
Bachirat Colsen - Morrocos
Consultancy Tecnology Engineering
Colsen Milieu - Belgium
Shanghai Minsion - China
Clear Industry - China
Ahidra-Colsen - Colombia
South Africa- Aquest Colsen
Grupo Gratt - Brasil
Ahidra-Colsen - Chile
Procknor- Brasil
IBS - Argentina
Intema - Mexico
HydroItalia Colsen - Italy
Flo-Mech – UK
Group Ahidra - Colsen
Technologies
MBRBubble aerat ionTwo stage Act ivated s ludge
Water line aerobic
technologies
UASBDIGESTMIX ®DIGESTER
Anaerobic
technologies
BIDOX ®
Biogas line
Biogas
condit ioning
Biogas
pol ishing
4
Intensive livestock zones
Fertilizers
blends
Nutrients shortage areas
Individually
concentrated
fertilizers:
N, K, P
ManureEcoMine - Concept
5
Research institutions
1. Ghent University- CMET
2. Girona University- UdG
3. Santiago de Compostela
University - USC
4. University of Natural
Resources and Life Science
Vienna - BOKU
5. Forschungszentrum Jülich
(FZL)
Entrerprises
1. Colsen BV
2. Van Alphen BV
3. Ahidra, agua y energía S.L.
4. Baucells Alibes, S.A.
5. LVA Gmbh
6. Peltracom NV
ManureEcoMine - Partners
6
ManureEcoMine – Work Packages Structure
8
Evaluation of fertilizer effect on
plant/soil
WP 6
WP 1
Technological lab optimization for pilot operation
Technological lab support for pilot
design
WP 5
WP 4WP 2
Pilot plant installation, disinfection and moving
Pilot plant design, engineering, construction
WP 3
WP 7
Economic sustainability
Risk analyses and safety management
Environmental sustainability
Green fertilizer blending
Demonstrative operation of the
pilot plant
Technological optimization of the
pilot plant
Manure characterization
ManureEcoMine – Pilot Demonstration
ES (AHIDRA + BALSA)NL (COLSEN + VAN ALPHEN)
9
NL
• Pig manure
• Thermophilic digestion + NH3 stripping
• Co-substrates: organic residues from corn silage and vegetables
• Duration: 10 months
ES
• Cow manure
• Mesophilic digestion
• Co-substrates: segregates, pig manure
• Duration: 10 months
manure storage
Thermophilic/Mesophilic
ADStripper Absorber
Separation
Precipitator
NH4+ struvite
P & N
fertilizer
Partial nitritation/anammox
Nitritation/denitritation
Precipitator Irrigation
water
(K fertilizer)
K struvite
P & K
fertilizer
Organic &
P fertilizer
N & S
fertilizer
Solids/liquids/slurries
Energy
Gasses
Mg(OH)2 Mg(OH)2
H2SO4NH3
air
airair
air
air
P1 N1 P2
N2
ManureEcoMine – Technologies
10
ManureEcoMine – Manure processing steps (WPs 1-4)
11
Controlled/stable operational conditions
Lab-scale optimization
Operational parameters for optimal resource mining from manure at minimum energy and reagents
consumption
Real conditions
Pilot plant operation
New issues/challenges to deal with
LAB
ON
-SIT
E
Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion
Definition of optimal mixture of residues
Maximizing methane production and nutrients
release in a stable operation
Ammonia nitrogen vs. Anaerobic digestion
ManureEcoMine – Anaerobic digestion & stripping
12
Ammonia inhibition: thresholds
and factors
Ammonia removal by stripping
Influence of stripping on
anaerobic biological activities
Influence of ammonia stripping
on the thermophilic anaerobic co-
digestion of pig manure and food
waste
BOKU´s role:
Reactor configuration for high solid content
influent characteristics
Operational conditions effects in stripping
efficiency, pH, air flow and solids content.
Batch or continuous operation and HRT
Liquid/air ratio optimization
Exhaust gases analysis, air, biogas,….
Washing acids analysis.
Operation conditions and configurations evaluation for ammonium stripping
considering minimum energy consumption and heat and maximum ammonium transfer
ManureEcoMine – Optimisation of NH3 Stripping
13
NH4+ ↔ NH3 ↑ + H+ pH - value
HCO3- ↔ CO2 ↑ + OH- pH – value
ManureEcoMine – Pilot results (NL)
14
Stripped digestate recirculated period
Constant load at 3.8 kg COD/m3·d
• 157 L/d recirculation
ManureEcoMine – Pilot results (SP)
15
• Constant load at 3 g COD/L·d under VFAs constant values
• Biogas mean production under EE 4.6 m3/d
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Tota
l alk
alin
ity,
VFA
s[g
CaC
O3/L
)
OLR
[kg
CO
D/m
3·d
]G
PR
[m
3b
ioga
s/m
3re
acto
r·d
]
Time [d]
OLR GPR VFAs Alcalinidad total
“Optimisation of the digestate Solid-Liquid separation minimising energy consumption
and maximizing the P content in the liquid fraction”.
ManureEcoMine – S-L separation
16
1 – Dewatering
• Decanter
• 30s <HRT <45s
HRT>45s: low flow = low production
• 1500 <g <2000
g>2000 not feasible
2 - Microfiltration
• Ceramic membranes
• Cut-off: 100 nm
• Surface: 1.08 m2
ManureEcoMine – Struvite precipitation
Struvite precipitation from simulated and real manure
Operation: BATCH or CONTINUOUS
The design enhances the heterogeneous nucleation: recirculation of cores
formed by fluidisation of small particles.
Optimum operation conditions: pH = 8.5 ; Ratio Mg2+/PO43- ≈ 1.6
Characteristics of the crystalliser:
Simulated manure Digested manure
P recovery > 60-70 %> 90 %
Production ≈ 0.4 g L-1treated
(0.2–1 g L-1treated)
≈ 0.9 g L-1treated
(0.5 - 1 g L-1treated)
ProductStruvite
Traces of other precipitates
Pure Struvite Simulated manure
17
Digestate manure
ManureEcoMine – Biological Nitrogen Removal
Partial nitritation/Anammox
25% less oxygen consumption in relation
to the standard process
Adequate for high BOD/N ratio and after
thermophilic AD + NH3 stripping
60% less oxygen consumption in
relation to standard process
Adequate for low BOD/N ratio –
mesophilic AD - no NH3 stripping
+ O2 + O2
Partial nitritation/Denitritation
18
Most sustainable way to remove nitrogen
Less oxygen and carbon required, compared to other
biological pathways
Reduced operation costs
Anammox bacteria are very sensitive
Goal: Thanks to adaptation/selection,
anammox bacteria are able to remove
nitrogen from pig manure permeate
ANAMMOX INHIBITION TESTS PARTIAL NITRITATION/ANAMMOX REACTOR
Anammox biomass
ManureEcoMine – BNR shortcut Partial Nitritation/Anammox
19
Goal: Determine the anammox activity at different
dilutions of liquid fraction of manure digestate
Conclusion: Decreasing anammox activity with
increasing manure digestate amounts, higher
tolerance in permeate compared to centrate
Advantages
• 25% reduction in O2 demand
• 40% reduction in carbon demand
• 40% reduction in biomass production
0
50
100
150
200
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Nitrite(mgN/L)
N2Oemissionfactor(%
)
Time(day)
Total
Aerobic
Nitrite
Lab-scale Reactor
• Out-selection NOB
• 100% NH4+ removal
• Minimum NO2- and
NO3- in the effluent
N2O campaign
• Potent greenhouse gas
• Produced by both nitritation
and denitritation
• On-line monitoring N2O
analyzer
• Mitigation: low NO2-, high DO,
sufficient carbon supply
20
ManureEcoMine – Sustainably BNR: Nitritation/Denitritation
ManureEcoMine – Pilot operation in NL
21
Unidades Pig manure Ecofrit Digestate CentrateUF
permeate
Struvite
effluent
(before BNR)
DM g/kg80-91 160-190 55-60 25-30 10-15 11-14
ODM g/kg 52-64 120-140 30-37 15-20 5-6 4.2-4.5
COD g/kg 60-90 210-240 60-75 20-25 6.9-7.5 4.0-5.6
TN g/kg 5-7 6.5-8.0 3.9-4.2 3.0-3.5 1.8-2.1 1.7-2.0
NH4+-N g/kg 4-5 1.5-1.9 2.5-2.7 1.8-2.0 1.4-1.8 1.1-1.5
TP mg/kg1,400-1,900 2,400-2,600 1,400-1,750 250-300 100-110 12-20
PO43--P mg/kg
1,200-1,650 2,000-2,200 1,300-1,600 220-240 90-100 10-17
>50% red. >50% red. Low reduction
>80% red. >50% red. >80% red.
ManureEcoMine – Pilot operation in SP
22
613.50
222.00
596.00 591.50
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
Feed Centrate
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
mg/
l]
TP
Screened digestate Screened+ acidified digestate
512.50
145.50
556.50 543.50
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
Feed Centrate
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
mg/
l]
Soluble TP
Screened digestate Screened+ acidified digestate
498.00
127.50
517.00 504.00
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
Feed Centrate
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
mg/
l]
Phosphates P-PO43-
Screened digestate Screened+ acidified digestate
464.00
88.90
502.50 489.50
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
Feed Centrate
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n [
mg/
l]
Soluble Phosphates P-PO43-
Screened digestate Screened+ acidified digestate
Cow,pig
manure and
co-substrates
UltrafiltrationDecanter
Centrifuge
Solid fraction/
Compost
Biological N
removal reactor
Struvite/
Fertilizer
Irrigation
water
Struvite
reactor
Mesophilic
Anaerobic
Digester
Retentate/
Compost
150 kg/d
DM g/kg 70.5
ODM g/kg 57.2
COD g/kg 79.6
TN g/kg 3.9
N-NH4+ g/kg 1.9
TP mg/l 585
P-PO43- mg/l 398
Biogas
Flow rate m3/d 4.2
Composition % v/v CH4 55
146 kg/d
DM g/kg 42.8
ODM g/kg 30.9
COD g/kg 37.4
TN g/kg 4.1
N-NH4+ g/kg 2.5
TP mg/l 623
P-PO43- mg/l 516
130 kg/d
DM g/kg 38.4
ODM g/kg 25.7
COD g/kg 24.3
TN g/kg 3.9
N-NH4+ g/kg 2.3
TP mg/l 616
P-PO43- mg/l 580
16 kg/d
DM g/kg 188
ODM g/kg 152
100 kg/d
DM g/kg 9.1
ODM g/kg 2.9
COD g/kg 3.5
TN g/kg 2.1
N-NH4+ g/kg 1.5
TP mg/l 166
P-PO43- mg/l 145
104 kg/d
DM g/kg 7.7
ODM g/kg 2.4
COD g/kg 2.0
TN g/kg 1.9
N-NH4+ g/kg 1.1
TP mg/l 22
P-PO43- mg/l 19
30 kg/d
DM g/kg 133
ODM g/kg 99
100 g/d
104 kg/d
DM g/kg < 5
ODM g/kg < 1
COD g/kg < 1.0
TN g/kg < 0.6
N-NH4+ g/kg <0.2
TP mg/l <15
P-PO43- mg/l <12
ManureEcoMine – Preliminary results SP
23
MANURE
PRODUCTIONMANURE
PROCESSING
FERTILIZER +
GROUTH SUBSTRATE
PRODUCTION
ManureEcoMine – Project Structure
24
Phytotoxicity test with Lepidium: Effect on germination
Fertilisers blending
Fertilisers blending and screening
25
FERTILIZERS END-USE
MANURE
PRODUCTIONMANURE
PROCESSING
FERTILIZER + GROUTH
SUBSTRATE
PRODUCTION
ManureEcoMine – Project structure
26
27
Role of Jülich:
Effects of the recovered nutrients in the different
formulations of fertilizers over the biomass yield.
Nutrients availability for the plants at different soils and
pHs.
Leachate nutrients effect on the soil health and the
microbiology of the rhizosphere .
Experiments:
In greenhouses and external conditions.
Study the growth of the crops through remote sensors
indicating the height of the plant, shoot imagining,
architecture of the roots, amongst others…
ManureEcoMine – Fertiliser application
“Evaluate the fertilizers blends over the plants growth and the soil, including GHG
emissions and migration of trace contaminants”
Organic StruviteNo fertilizer
28
ManureEcoMine – Fertiliser application
Effects of Struvite on tomato plants:
Lupin growths better with Struvite than with 3SP
P-Struvite tests with Lupin in acidic soils
Fertiliser end useManureEcoMine – Fertiliser application
29
No P fertilizer + NO3
-
BC
3SP+ NO3-Struvite + NO3
-
PROCESS QUALITY
LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS, RISK MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC VIABILITY
FERILIZAR FINAL END-USE
MANURE
PRODUCTIONMANURE
PROCESSING
FERTILIZERS
FORMULATION AND
APPLICATION
ManureEcoMine – Project Structure
30
Economics sustainability
Guidance of best economic practices for the processes
Online tool of quick scanning
Environmental sustainability
Mitigation of greenhouse gases from the pilot
Energy balance and maximum performance of the pilot
GHG from the plants growth and tests of soil.
Evaluation of the life cycle impact to demonstrate the low MEM environmental
impact.
Risk and management analysis for trace contaminants.
Analysis and minimisation of potential contaminants from the recovered products.
Evaluation and management of the fertilizers recovered in a safe and sustainable
manner.
ManureEcoMine – Process quality and sustainability
3131
ManureEcoMine – Pilot operation results (NL and SP)
33
Pilot plant as a challenge:
Substrates variable composition
Technical problems solving
Anaerobic digestion: biogas production and
nutrients recovery
Efficient solid-liquid separation through
centrifugation and ultrafiltration membranes.
Maximisation of the nutrients recovery through
digestate acidification.
Production of N-Struvite from processed cow/pig
manure.
It is possible to get levels <20 mg/l PO4-P
As a P-fertilizer, Struvite has resulted in positive
effects for different crops and ornamental plants in
greenhouse experiments.
Flexible combined processes under different
scenarios and successful technologies integration.
Turn Manure into a feasible and marketable source
ManureEcoMine expected resultsManureEcoMine – Preliminary results
Successful treatment of pig manure and co- substrates
through thermophilic anaerobic digestion (NL) up to an
OLR of 5 g COD/l·d. Possible inhibition by high levels of
FA is avoided by Stripping of Ammonium at 55ºC
maximizing biogas production.
Successful treatment of cow manure and co- substrates
under mesophilic conditions (ES) achieving steady state
at an OLR of 3 g COD/l·d and a HRT of 20 days.
Preserve the environment by recovering and reusing
nutrients from livestock manure.
34
Acknowledgements
ManureEcoMine project is funded by the European Community’s
Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant
Agreement n° 603744
Thank you for your attention!
www.manureecomine.be
Watch MEM project video! www.manureecomine.eu