GREEN CLIMATE GCF PROGRAMMING MANUAL FUND...STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS 2. TECHNICAL...
Transcript of GREEN CLIMATE GCF PROGRAMMING MANUAL FUND...STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS 2. TECHNICAL...
GREENCLIMATE FUND
7 October 2020
GCF PROGRAMMING MANUAL
• Pre-recorded section:• Introduction from Executive Director• Overview of manual and the project cycle• Introduction to Funding Proposal user guide
• Live Q&A session with Secretariat staff
WEBINAR AGENDA
GCF PROJECT CYCLE
LINKS BETWEEN GCF PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORKS
THE PROJECT CYCLE
STAGE 1: COUNTRY, REGIONAL, ANDACCREDITED ENTITY WORK PROGRAMMES
STAGE 2: TARGETED GENERATION OF PROJECT OR PROGRAMME FUNDING PROPOSALS
Example: CIP (Climate Investment Platform)• Use of Requests for Proposals (RFPs)• REDD+• MSMEs• Enhanced Direct Access• Mobilising Funds at Scale
• Generation of Project Ideas through Dedicated Project Preparation Partnerships and Platforms
STAGE 3: CONCEPT NOTE
• Concept note development and review stages, including review criteria by GCF’s Climate Investment Committee• Support available for concept note and funding proposal
development• Notification process for NDAs and consultation with NDAs
STAGE 4: DEVELOPMENT OF FUNDING PROPOSALS
• Key elements of first level due diligence by the AE• Documentation and
completeness checklist • Information disclosure
requirements for projects and programmes under GCF’s Information disclosure policy
• Best case scenario – 190 days to complete FP review and send it to Board approval• Timeline also
depends on the AE responsiveness to the Secretariat’s comments
FUNDING PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND REVIEW TIMELINE
STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS
STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS1. INITIAL REVIEW AGAINST INVESTMENT CRITERIA
IMPACT POTENTIAL PARADIGM SHIFT POTENTIAL
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
COUNTRY OWNERSHIP
NEEDS OF THE RECIPIENT EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS 2. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
Interdivisional Project Team (IPT)
Division of Mitigation
and Adaptation
Private Sector Facility
Office of Portfolio
Management
Office of Risk Management
and Compliance
Office of General Counsel
Division of Country
Programming
ESS, GenderFinance,
Procurement
Country ownership
Financial structure, terms and conditions,
economic impact & viability, budgets
Adherence to project policies, AML/CFT, ESS,
Gender, IP, SEAH
Results accountability: ToC, log frame, GHG
calculations, M&E
AE/EE capacities and accreditation scope
ESS and project execution risks; risk
assessment by ORMC
First level due
diligence by AEs
Second level due diligence by GCF; independent appraisal
of FP by ORMC
2DD ensures:• Investments align with GCF mandate and policies• Assess impact of projects and programs• Potential risks to reflows, reputation• Sustainability of the Fund
Technical review by
project teams
STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS3. 2DD APPRAISAL BY INDEPENDENT UNIT WITHIN ORMC
• Scope of review: ITAP reviews according to 6 investment criteria
• ITAP makes recommendation on whether the project can be presented to the Board
• Lessons learnt from reviews included in the Annex (e.g. recent ITAP reviews were more stringent on climate rationale)
STAGE 5: FUNDING PROPOSAL REVIEW PROCESS INDEPENDENT TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT PANEL (ITAP) REVIEW
STAGE 6: BOARD CONSIDERATION AND DECISION
• FP must be published 21 days before Board meeting
• Board questions & clarifications:• written questions in advance,• at technical session held during informal
Board meeting,• at the Board meeting
STAGE 7: LEGAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR APPROVED PROPOSALS
Milestones in the FAA process*:
* The above timelines may be longer if the AE’s certificate of internal approval comes after Board approval
Standard timeline
Aspirational timeline
PORTFOLIO IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING & MANAGEMENT: OVERVIEW
STAGE 8: MONITORING FOR PERFORMANCE AND COMPLIANCE
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT TRIGGERS
STAGE 9: ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
Risk flags from monitoring tools
Ad-hoc reporting & engagement
Complaints to Secretariat, IIU & IRM
Requests from countries, AEs on changes in project design
STAGE 10: EVALUATION, LEARNING AND PROJECT CLOSURE
• Levels of evaluation vis-a-vis the roles & mandates of AEs, Secretariat and IEU in line with the Governing Instrument (GI) and MAF
• Linkages between evaluation and learning
• How the Secretariat operationalizes its learning & knowledge management function in line with the GI
• Project closure activities
FUNDING PROPOSAL USER’S GUIDE
FUNDING PROPOSAL USER'S GUIDE
Climate context, and how to elaborate a clear climate rationale/ climate problem in the context of the
proposed project activities
GCF’s results management framework and performance measurement frameworks, with details on how to fill
logical framework using the Fund's indicators
A detailed list of all investment criteria, sub-criteria and indicators relevant for Fund's investments are outlined
there as well, and other information
This is a comprehensive guide on putting together a Funding Proposal
Guidance is provided on various elements of the template including:
• Reduction in length: from 22 to 16 pages /page number limited to word limit
• Sections moved/modified: Sections combined and compressed with subsections
• Subsections removed and moved to the Annexes: Financial markets overview, Regulation, Taxation and insurance, Technical evaluation
• Additional annexes requested: stakeholder consultations, gender assessment and action plan, AE fee calculation and methodology, etc.
• Annex templates provided with links
KEY CHANGES FROM OLD TEMPLATE
1. Completed funding proposal template
2. NDA NOL(s)
3. Feasibility study
4. Economic and/or financial analysis
5. Detailed budget plan
6. Implementation timetable
7. Environmental and social safeguards disclosure form
8. Summary of consultations and stakeholder engagement plan
9. Gender assessment and project-/programme-level action plan
10. Legal due diligence
11. Monitoring and evaluation plans
12. Procurement plan
13. AE fee request
14. Co-financing commitment letter
15. Term sheet
16. Evidence of internal approval
17. Map(s) indicating the location of proposed interventions
18. Multi-country project/programme information
19. Appraisal, due diligence or evaluation report for proposals based on scaling up or replicating a pilot project
20. Procedures for controlling procurement by third parties or EEs undertaking projects financed by the AE
21. First-level AML/CFT (KYC) risk assessment
22. GHG calculations
23. Other references, such as Operations manual
FP TEMPLATE ANNEXES
PM FEEDBACK
• For enquiries, comments, and feedback, please email: [email protected]
• Document page: https://g.cf/progmanual
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
GREENCLIMATE FUND