Greek thermal springs
description
Transcript of Greek thermal springs
Contribution to the study of Greek thermal springs: hydrogeologicaland hydrochemical characteristics and origin of thermal waters
Nicolaos Lambrakis · George Kallergis
Abstract A large number of chemical analyses of Greekthermal waters were evaluated in order to investigatespring water origin, water–rock interaction mechanisms,and estimate the thermal potential of the geothermal ar-eas. Four water types were distinguished from geochem-ical diagrams. The relatively fresher waters include sam-ples of Ca–HCO3 and Mg–HCO3 type waters originatingfrom the schistose Rhodope Massif and the Quaternarybasin of Aridea, respectively. Samples of the Na–HCO3water type are typical of springs located in the post-oro-genic basins of northern Greece. These hot, deep-risingNa–HCO3 waters circulate in a CO2-rich environmentthat favours the solubility of alkaline ions such as Nafrom siliceous rocks. Most of the samples belong to theNa–Cl water type and originate from Greek islands andcoastal springs. These are characterized by the mixing ofdeep thermal solutions with seawater and fresh water. Thepresence of CO2 in thermal and mineral springs is due tothe metamorphism of buried marine carbonate horizonswhile H2S is due to both local pyrite oxidation andthe reduction of sulphates. The use of geothermometerssuggested that the investigated geothermal areas havelow enthalpy fluids at depth, while higher temperaturesare likely present in Milos, Lesvos, Nisyros islands andXanthi Basin.
R�sum� Un grand nombre d’analyses chimiques deseaux thermales grecques ont �t� men�es de mani�re �investiguer l’origine des eaux des sources thermales, lesm�canismes d’interaction avec les roches travers�es, etd’estimer le potentiel des zones g�othermiques. Quatretypes d’eau ont �t� distingu�es sur base des diagrammes
g�ochimiques. Les eaux les plus fra�ches correspondentrespectivement aux �chantillons des eaux calco et ma-gn�so carbonat�es du massif schisteux de Rhodope et dubassin quaternaire d’Aridea. Les �chantillons d’eaux sodicarbonat�es proviennent typiquement des sources locali-s�es dans les bassins posts-orog�niques du Nord de laGr�ce. Ces chaudes et tr�s profondes eaux sodi carbona-t�es circulent dans des environnements riches en CO2 quifavorisent la solubilit� des ions alcalins, tel que le sodium,des roches siliceuses. La plus part des �chantillons ont unfacies chlorur� sodique et proviennent des �les grecquesou des environnement c�tier. Ces eaux sont caract�ris�espar des m�langes entre eaux profondes avec des eaux demer et des eaux de surface. La pr�sence de CO2 dans leseaux de sources thermales et min�rales est due au m�ta-morphisme des horizons de calcaires marins et couverts,tandis que la pr�sence de H2S est due � l’oxydation localede la pyrite et � la r�duction des sulfates. L’utilisation deg�othermom�tres sugg�re que les zones g�othermiques�tudi�es contiennent des eaux � faible enthalpie en pro-fondeur, bien que des temp�ratures assez �lev�es soientrencontr�es � Milos, Lesvos, sur les �les Nisyros et dans lebassin de Xanthi.
Resumen Se ha evaluado un gran nfflmero de an�lisisqu�micos de aguas termales griegas con objeto de inves-tigar el origen del agua en los manantiales, los mecanis-mos de interaccin agua-roca, y estimar el potencial ter-mal de las �reas geot�rmicas. Se distinguieron cuatro ti-pos de aguas a partir de diagramas geoqu�micos. Lasaguas relativamente frescas incluyen muestras de aguatipo Ca–HCO3 y Mg–HCO3 que se originan en los es-quistos del Macizo Rhodope y la cuenca Cuaternariade Aridea, respectivamente. Las muestras de agua tipoNa–HCO3 son t�picas de manantiales localizados en lascuencas post-orog�nicas del norte de Grecia. Estas aguascalientes y profundas, de tipo Na–HCO3, circulan en unambiente rico en CO2 que favorece la solubilidad de ionesalcalinos, tal como Na proveniente de rocas sil�cicas. Lamayor�a de las muestras pertenecen al tipo de agua Na–Cly se originan en islas y manantiales costeros griegos.Estas aguas se caracterizan por la mezcla de solucionestermales profundas con agua de mar y agua dulce. Lapresencia de CO2 en manantiales termales y minerales sedebe a el metamorfismo de horizontes carbonatados ma-rinos enterrados mientras que el H2S se debe a oxidacin
Received: 8 March 2003 / Accepted: 17 April 2004Published online: 28 May 2004
Springer-Verlag 2004
N. Lambrakis ()) · G. KallergisDepartment of Geology,Section of Applied Geology and Geophysics,Laboratory of Hydrogeology,University of Patras,26500 Rio-Patras, Greecee-mail: [email protected].: +30-2610-997782Fax: +30-2610-997782
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
local de pirita y reduccin de sulfatos. El uso de geoter-mmetros sugiere que las �reas termales investigadastienen fluidos de baja entalp�a a profundidad, mientrasque las temperaturas m�s elevadas es probable que sepresenten en Milos, Lesvos, islas de Nisyros y la cuencaXanthi.
Keywords Thermal springs · Chemical and isotopiccomposition · Geothermometry · Greece
Introduction
There are many thermal springs in Greece due to thegeology of the country. Magmatic and volcanic processes,the high mountain chains and active fault systems favourthe rise of deep waters that discharge at the surface asthermal springs. The origin of the fluid movement resultsfrom a thermal gradient closely relating to volcanic ac-tivity, leading to convection. Although numerous studieson the origin and quality of thermal waters in territories inGreece have been made during the last 30 years, none ofthem concentrates on the entire country. A large num-ber of chemical analyses of thermal waters exist in manytechnical reports and papers. Their evaluation for thewhole of Greece is not an easy task because (1) the originof the sampling points are not always exactly positioned,(2) the analyses originated from many different labora-tories and their accuracy is not evident, and (3) the anal-yses were made over very different time periods. From1985–1988, the Institute of Geological and Mineral Ex-ploration in Greece (IGME) performed a great number ofchemical analyses on all known Greek thermal springs(Gioni-Stavropoulou 1983; Orfanos 1985; Sfetsos 1988).About 1,300 analyses were evaluated and the most rep-resentative were chosen for each thermal field (Table 1).Chemical patterns of thermal fields resulting from theseanalyses are in agreement with those given in studies onany particular field and therefore are considered to ac-curately reflect the mean chemical composition of ther-mal waters. Similarly, the collected data on isotopic anal-yses are almost the same during different periods. Forexample, stable isotope values of spring 76Le (see Ta-ble 2) do not vary significantly in time despite beingrecorded over a 10-year period. The aim of this paper is todescribe the main hydrogeological and hydrochemicalcharacteristics of geothermal fields and investigate theorigin of thermal waters. Processing of chemical analyseswas made using the Phreeqc program. Saturation indexeswere also simulated and to estimate the thermal waterreservoir temperature all possible geothermometers wereapplied.
Geographical Distribution of Mineraland Thermal Springs
Figure 1a shows the geographical distribution of the mainthermal springs of Greece, and Fig. 1b shows the coun-
try’s heat flow contour lines (in mW/cm2; Fytikas andKolios 1979). By comparing these maps, it can be easilyseen that most thermal springs are mainly located in areaswith greater heat flow which originated from intensevolcanic activity that took place in recent geologicaltimes. Areas with anomalous geothermal gradients are (1)the slow-moving Tertiary tectonic area of the northernAegean area (Salonica, Migdonia, Anthemus, Strimonas,Drama, Xanthi-Komotini, and Alexandroupolis Basins,the volcanoes of Samothrace, Limnos, Ag. Efstratios andLesvos Islands) (2) the volcanic arc of the southern Ae-gean areas, which is bordered by the volcanic centres ofMicrothiba, Achilion, Lichades, Loutraki, Aigina, Me-thana, Paros, Thira, Nisiros, Ko and others, and, (3) theSperchios depression which is not related with obviousvolcanic activity. To the west of the described regions, thenumber of mineral and thermal springs is small. Theirpresence is always related to that of fault systems.
General Hydrogeological Aspectsof the Main Thermal Fields of Greece
Intense volcanic activity in Greece is known from thepresence of volcanic rocks found in all isopic zones ofcontinental Greece and the islands. From Tertiary times,the Aegean area has been dominated by orogenic vol-canism due to the relative advance of the African plateinto the Eurasian mass. Geochronological and geologicaldata show that volcanic activity has migrated southwardswith time (Fytikas et al. 1984). This volcanic activity isclosely related to fault systems that favour the displace-ment in depth of ground waters and the development ofthermal springs.
According to Fytikas et al. (1984) and Pe-Piper andPiper (1989), volcanic activity in the Aegean Sea com-menced in the Oligocene and continues to the present day.Two major phases took place. The first stage was theOligocene–Miocene volcanic phase during which thevolcanic activity occurred in an East to West orientatedzone from Thrace to the Central Aegean. This activity islocated in many places of the Central Aegean region(Lichades of Euboea Island, Tinos, Sikinos, Samos andPatmos islands). Petrographically, two rock types aremainly observed: the calcareous alkaline type with thedominance of acid members (andesites and dacites) de-veloped mainly in Thrace, and the sosonitic type. Thesecond stage was the Pleistocene to the Quaternary phaseduring which the volcanic centres were arranged into thevolcanic arc of the south Aegean. Petrographically, thecalcareous alkaline series is present with all its membersfrom basalt to ryolithes. Intermediate phases of localvolcanic activity also took place from the Miocene to theQuaternary periods.
Numerous thermal fields are located in the Tertiarybasins of northern Greece. During the Tertiary periodwhen volcanic activity took place, the Rhodope mass (NGreece) shared a long fault of NE–SW, ENE–WSW andNW–SE direction that was active throughout the Neogene
507
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Spr
ing
desi
gnat
ions
Lit
holo
gyT
�CP
HT
DS
(mg/
L)
SiO
2(m
g/L
)C
O2
(mg/
L)
H2S
(mg/
L)
Mg2
+
(mg/
L)
Ca2
+
(mg/
L)
Na+
(meq
/L)
K+
(meq
/L)
HC
O3
–
(meq
/L)
Cl–
(meq
/L)
SO
42–
(meq
/L)
Na/
KF
79�C
Na/
KT
r76
�C
1A-T
h1L
avas
and
neog
ene
form
atio
ns49
.50
7.10
8,34
00.
001.
0027
.00
108.
03.
503.
8312
5.28
10.2
5
2A-T
h2M
olas
ses,
lava
s,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
28.0
08.
1531
40.
000.
120.
485.
450.
071.
772.
801.
5711
467
3X-T
h3G
neis
ses,
gran
ites
,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
52.5
06.
854,
157
373.
000.
001.
906.
4065
.52
3.80
26.1
546
.25
4.97
216
186
4X-T
h5G
neis
ses,
gran
ites
,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
43.0
06.
804,
093
293.
000.
001.
716.
9064
.72
4.20
25.8
946
.25
5.05
226
199
5R-T
h6G
neis
ses,
amph
ibol
ites
,tr
aver
tine
s52
.00
6.65
869
198.
000.
000.
607.
206.
750.
7010
.89
1.30
3.13
271
258
6R-T
h7G
neis
ses,
amph
ibol
ites
,tr
aver
tine
s52
.00
6.65
914
250.
000.
000.
687.
116.
720.
6010
.83
1.30
3.06
256
238
7R-T
h8G
neis
ses,
amph
ibol
ites
,tr
aver
tine
s53
.00
6.55
957
295.
000.
000.
647.
116.
700.
6010
.73
1.30
3.10
256
238
8R-M
1V
olca
nics
,gr
anit
es,
trav
erti
nes
43.5
06.
901,
074
120.
0020
4.00
0.00
0.48
3.83
17.0
00.
8017
.73
2.10
2.30
199
165
9R-M
2V
olca
nics
,ga
nite
s,tr
aver
tine
s55
.00
6.85
1,04
111
5.00
162.
000.
000.
564.
0716
.50
1.20
18.2
92.
002.
2023
621
2
10D
-M7
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts30
.00
7.40
259
16.0
00.
001.
163.
270.
440.
034.
090.
300.
4723
020
4
11S
-M8
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts39
.50
6.30
2,83
016
.00
671.
003.
021.
5012
.79
25.0
12.
0018
.53
21.2
01.
7724
522
4
12S
-M9
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts40
.50
6.20
2,91
616
.00
700.
002.
601.
3013
.20
26.2
12.
0119
.07
21.7
51.
6824
121
8
13S
-M10
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts41
.00
6.50
3,24
213
.00
984.
002.
851.
4813
.20
26.3
62.
2019
.31
22.5
01.
6524
922
9
14S
-M11
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts52
.00
6.55
3,31
641
.00
342.
000.
001.
607.
7942
.51
3.00
13.7
736
.75
4.38
233
208
15S
-M14
Per
idot
ites
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
52.0
07.
001,
968
28.0
035
0.00
0.00
9.80
6.00
25.2
12.
0035
.19
4.75
2.85
244
223
16S
-M15
Per
idot
ites
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
51.0
07.
201,
891
33.0
028
8.00
0.00
9.80
6.20
25.0
11.
8035
.39
4.25
2.84
235
211
17S
-M16
Per
idot
ites
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
44.0
06.
802,
216
31.0
060
3.00
0.00
9.20
6.59
24.5
62.
335
.51
4.50
2.78
260
244
18S
-M17
Per
idot
ites
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
27.0
06.
601,
974
21.0
069
3.00
0.00
9.20
5.50
18.7
50.
1027
.99
3.5
2.11
7222
19S
-M18
Mar
bles
,sc
hist
s,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
40.5
07.
9025
916
.00
0.00
0.44
2.15
2.72
0.10
2.99
0.40
2.04
180
142
20S
-M19
Mar
bles
,sc
hist
s,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
40.5
07.
8523
913
.00
0.38
2.15
2.48
0.08
2.91
0.20
1.94
171
131
21S
-M21
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns44
.50
6.70
1,15
428
.00
310.
000.
001.
706.
8310
.00
1.34
14.6
11.
403.
9629
929
8
22S
-M22
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns37
.00
6.90
1,10
080
.00
194.
000.
002.
166.
4010
.70
1.24
15.3
71.
403.
9128
327
5
23S
-M23
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns50
.50
7.20
1,01
726
.00
146.
000.
001.
926.
9610
.45
1.20
14.7
91.
603.
9828
227
3
24S
-M25
Mar
bles
,gr
anit
es,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns37
.10
7.20
647
45.0
053
.00
0.33
0.70
0.87
13.3
00.
4410
.83
1.50
3.06
133
172
25M
-M44
Gra
nite
s,pl
eist
ocen
ede
posi
ts50
.20
7.85
7,36
43.0
011
.76
0.19
1.00
12.1
00.
225.
391.
206.
8613
489
26M
-M45
Pro
babl
ygr
anit
es,
plei
stoc
ene
depo
sits
35.0
08.
1563
033
.00
3.68
0.24
0.76
10.0
80.
113.
710.
756.
5110
558
27M
-M46
Pro
babl
ygr
anit
es,
plei
stoc
ene
depo
sits
40.8
07.
2548
829
.00
0.33
1.72
3.24
5.28
0.17
5.71
0.66
4.05
170
131
28M
-M47
Pro
babl
ygr
anit
es,
plei
stoc
ene
depo
sits
39.8
07.
5049
132
.00
0.50
1.76
3.24
5.25
0.17
5.69
0.68
3.93
171
131
29A
i-M
48P
erid
otit
esan
dga
bbro
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
36.5
09.
6052
659
.00
14.7
80.
070.
207.
680.
060.
556.
700.
6589
40
30A
i-M
49P
erid
otit
esan
dga
bbro
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
36.2
09.
6052
661
.00
16.1
20.
040.
167.
720.
060.
696.
600.
6689
40
Tab
le1
Che
mic
alan
alys
esof
ther
mal
and
min
eral
wat
ers
ofG
reec
e(G
ioni
-Sta
vrop
oulo
u19
83;O
rfan
os19
85;S
fets
os19
88).
Cal
cula
ted
tem
pera
ture
sus
ing
the
Na/
Kge
othe
rmom
eter
s,af
ter
Fou
rnie
r19
79an
dT
rues
dell
1975
508
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Spr
ing
desi
gnat
ions
Lit
holo
gyT
�CP
HT
DS
(mg/
L)
SiO
2(m
g/L
)C
O2
(mg/
L)
H2S
(mg/
L)
Mg2
+
(mg/
L)
Ca2
+
(mg/
L)
Na+
(meq
/L)
K+
(meq
/L)
HC
O3
–
(meq
/L)
Cl–
(meq
/L)
SO
42–
(meq
/L)
Na/
KF
79�C
Na/
KT
r76
�C
31A
i-M
51M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns,
trav
erti
nes
27.0
06.
456,
438
33.0
084
0.00
0.00
0.00
123
.20
71.9
12.
3127
.99
75.0
0.08
170
131
32A
i-M
53M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
neog
ene
form
atio
ns,
trav
erti
nes
21.0
06.
102,
453
95.0
010
00.0
0.00
6.80
11.0
39.
400.
5019
.13
7.40
1.17
209
177
33A
i-M
59R
ecen
tde
posi
ts21
.80
6.70
6,30
229
.00
292.
000.
0012
.20
13.2
070
.03
1.50
17.3
777
.51.
9114
310
034
Ai-
M60
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
39.2
06.
3536
,783
40.0
071
9.00
101.
6462
.85
53.5
947
8.21
14.0
018
.79
549.
40.1
816
412
3
35A
r-M
61M
arbl
es,
trav
erti
nes
25.5
6.60
810
24.0
029
9.00
0.00
2.24
6.83
0.80
0.06
8.35
0.24
1.21
239
216
36A
r-M
62M
arbl
es,
trav
erti
nes
23.5
06.
351,
381
28.0
044
8.00
0.00
3.48
12.9
61.
940.
1215
.51
0.70
1.99
221
193
37A
r-M
64M
arbl
es,
mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,fl
ysch
36.5
06.
7085
622
.00
238.
000.
003.
887.
161.
460.
1311
.25
0.82
0.35
255
237
38A
r-M
65M
arbl
es,
mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,fl
ysch
37.2
06.
5094
522
.00
299.
000.
004.
007.
441.
570.
1511
.63
0.97
0.40
262
247
39A
g-I2
Lim
esto
ne,
sand
ston
e,sc
hist
s24
.06.
6514
,560
16.7
079
0.0
0.0
35.6
219
.59
173.
494.
888.
0420
5.4
20.3
316
112
0
40K
y-I3
Sch
ists
,m
arbl
es,
allu
vium
depo
sits
52.0
6.40
36,8
8031
.00
303.
00.
051
.62
74.0
495.
9711
.00
6.79
583.
931
.00
146
102
41K
y-I4
Sch
ists
,m
arbl
es,
allu
vium
depo
sits
38.0
6.70
12,7
5221
.00
117.
00.
017
.21
28.2
016
3.19
5.55
6.29
191.
914
.18
174
135
42M
i-I1
2R
hyol
itic
lava
s,tu
ffs,
allu
vium
depo
sits
22.0
6.80
23,3
9913
3.00
105.
00.
013
.41
55.7
827
1.98
43.7
17.
2335
5.9
17.9
032
233
0
43M
i-I1
3N
eoge
netu
ffs,
con-
glom
erat
es,
allu
vium
s50
.07.
0028
,638
140.
000.
017
.41
63.4
933
7.48
57.7
94.
6944
4.9
19.5
133
034
1
44M
i-I1
4N
eoge
netu
ffs,
allu
vium
27.0
6.90
3,82
111
8.00
174.
00.
04.
9613
.44
35.3
92.
809.
2941
.19
5.2
244
222
45M
i-I1
5N
eoge
netu
ffs,
pyro
-cl
asti
cs,
allu
vium
s26
.04.
053,
354
152.
0011
1.0
0.0
3.92
12.7
234
.03
4.20
12.2
933
.99
7.63
290
285
46M
i-I1
6N
eoge
netu
ffs,
rhy-
olit
icla
vas,
allu
vium
s40
.66.
708,
433
0.0
25.0
114
.97
96.7
32.
3816
.32
111.
311
.87
152
110
47M
i-I1
7A
lter
edvo
lcan
ics,
mud
flow
s-la
har
24.4
6.50
1,59
40.
03.
547.
3314
.48
0.58
5.43
16.7
72.
5618
615
0
48K
i-I1
8T
uffs
,cl
ays
47.0
36,4
3429
.00
24.0
0.0
98.0
559
.20
456.
9712
.46
1.87
547.
9272
.28
159
118
49K
i-I1
9T
uffs
55.0
7.00
37,1
6027
.00
26.0
0.0
99.4
549
.59
474.
9711
.00
1.94
566.
9269
.50
148
105
50K
i-I2
0T
uffs
48.5
07.
1037
,912
31.0
017
.00
0.0
105.
052
.79
484.
9711
.50
1.67
589.
9260
.70
150
107
51T
hi-I
21C
ryst
alli
zed
lim
esto
nes
32.0
07.
803,
900
32.0
01.
000.
012
.00
5.19
48.3
91.
202.
4355
.24
7.31
153
110
52T
hi-I
22P
hyll
ites
,py
rocl
asti
cs,
pum
ice
34.5
07.
008,
983
75.0
012
.00.
022
.41
10.7
911
4.99
2.50
3.42
124.
4821
.75
144
101
53A
na-I
23M
arbl
es,
clay
s26
.00
7.15
957
18.0
017
.00.
04.
262.
796.
091.
804.
577.
491.
2541
046
854
Ni-
I26
And
esit
icla
va,
tuff
san
dpu
mic
e57
.00
6.80
39,5
2314
0.0
42.0
00.
067
.63
61.5
952
3.97
21.5
12.
3963
4.91
36.2
818
815
2
55N
i-I2
7A
ndes
itic
lava
,tu
ffs
and
pum
ice
46.0
06.
9033
,144
11.7
039
.00
0.0
49.2
274
.79
419.
9721
.51
3.19
534.
9327
.93
205
173
56N
i-I2
8A
ndes
itic
lava
,tu
ffs
and
pum
ice
40.0
06.
6018
,153
83.0
057
.00
0.0
38.8
242
.79
219.
988.
503.
7228
5.96
19.3
418
314
7
57K
o-I2
9F
lysc
h,li
mes
tone
42.0
06.
2041
,241
24.0
026
9.0
1.17
96.0
577
.60
506.
9715
.00
21.1
159
3.92
75.7
616
412
458
Ko-
I30
Sch
ists
and
lim
esto
nes,
mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s46
.50
6.5
14,8
5538
.50
258.
00.
025
.21
32.0
017
5.98
5.02
15.7
520
2.97
18.9
916
212
1
59K
o-I3
1F
lysc
hw
ith
lim
esto
nele
nses
22.5
06.
52,
208
14.5
019
5.0
0.0
6.00
19.5
91.
060.
0518
.63
1.24
6.79
199
165
60K
a-I3
4L
imes
tone
san
ddo
lom
ites
37.0
06.
8039
,964
17.0
090
.00.
097
.65
42.0
524.
9715
.00
8.93
612.
4260
.72
162
129
61Ik
-I36
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es37
.00
7.05
11,6
9512
.00
16.0
0.0
26.0
115
.59
151.
994.
03.
417
8.97
17.4
015
717
562
Ik-I
37G
neis
ses,
mar
bles
35.0
07.
0026
,871
17.0
019
.50
0.0
60.8
334
.00
353.
9810
.00
3.56
416.
9439
.28
161
120
63Ik
-I38
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es35
.00
7.50
20,2
6914
.60
19.0
00.
047
.22
26.0
026
4.98
7.50
3.71
311.
9530
.61
161
120
64Ik
-I39
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es,
schi
sts,
cong
lom
erat
es58
.00
6.70
40,0
6525
.00
22.0
00.
073
.64
65.5
952
7.47
15.0
01.
8561
9.91
62.5
816
212
1
65Ik
-I40
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es,
schi
sts
54.0
06.
7039
,764
23.0
026
.00
0.0
72.4
364
.40
524.
9515
.00
1.99
614.
8961
.81
162
121
66Ik
-I41
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es,
schi
sts
47.8
07.
0037
,705
22.0
017
.00
0.0
66.8
358
.40
531.
4713
.00
2.31
5674
256
.21
152
169
Tab
le1
(con
tinu
ed)
509
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Spr
ing
desi
gnat
ions
Lit
holo
gyT
�CP
HT
DS
(mg/
L)
SiO
2(m
g/L
)C
O2
(mg/
L)
H2S
(mg/
L)
Mg2
+
(mg/
L)
Ca2
+
(mg/
L)
Na+
(meq
/L)
K+
(meq
/L)
HC
O3
–
(meq
/L)
Cl–
(meq
/L)
SO
42–
(meq
/L)
Na/
KF
79�C
Na/
KT
r76
�C
67Ik
-I42
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es,
schi
sts
54.0
06.
7039
,013
24.0
025
.00
0.0
71.6
365
.00
514.
9713
.00
2.16
604.
9259
.68
154
112
68Ik
-I43
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es,
schi
sts
55.0
06.
8039
,828
22.0
025
.00
0.0
71.6
464
.40
524.
9715
.00
2.09
617.
4261
.38
162
121
69Ik
-I44
Gne
isse
s,m
arbl
es40
.00
6.95
26,7
4917
.70
19.0
00.
059
.34
36.7
935
3.98
10.0
02.
9341
1.94
40.3
216
112
070
Ik-I
45G
neis
ses,
mar
bles
40.0
06.
9028
,696
17.0
020
.00
0.0
54.0
245
.20
379.
9710
.00
2.53
442.
444
.39
157
115
71S
a-I4
6G
neis
ses,
mar
bles
,re
cent
depo
sits
30.0
07.
909,
983
50.0
00.
028
.64
14.1
211
7.87
9.05
3.01
147.
8816
.90
241
218
72L
e-I4
7L
avas
30.0
56.
5031
138
.60
1.23
2.19
1.65
0.17
2.98
1.35
1.04
270
257
73L
e-I4
8A
ndes
itic
lava
s43
.00
7.00
5,17
643
.00
2.38
16.2
165
.28
1.73
2.49
74.0
19.
0515
711
574
Le-
I49
And
esit
icla
vas,
rece
ntde
posi
ts65
.00
6.40
12,0
4210
.00
7.24
40.2
115
0.06
5.80
1.80
192.
029.
4518
314
7
75L
e-I5
0Ig
nim
brit
es,
rece
ntde
posi
ts81
.50
6.30
11,4
2364
.00
10.0
426
.79
150.
065.
604.
6718
2.01
6.12
144
144
76L
e-I5
1Ig
nim
brit
es,
rece
ntde
posi
ts37
.00
6.10
12,1
1171
.00
10.2
828
.39
160.
075.
604.
8119
3.04
6.45
176
138
77L
e-I5
2Ig
nim
brit
es,
rece
ntde
posi
ts80
.00
6.30
11,1
6766
.00
9.79
25.9
914
7.06
5.39
4.47
178.
035.
9518
014
2
78L
e-I5
3Ig
nim
brit
es67
.00
5.90
11,1
2079
.00
9.87
25.9
914
7.06
4.80
4.63
177.
025.
7017
113
279
Le-
I54
Mar
bles
,cl
ays
and
sand
ston
es39
.00
6.70
1,53
114
.00
4.11
5.38
16.0
00.
694.
851.
260.
9319
215
7
80L
e-I5
5L
avas
,re
cent
depo
sits
25.0
06.
5034
51.
481.
691.
560.
232.
701.
740.
4531
131
481
Le-
I56
Mar
bles
,sc
hist
s,pe
rido
tite
s44
.00
6.70
24,9
7727
.00
53.2
536
.17
330.
148.
002.
3238
8.06
36.9
915
110
9
82L
e-I5
7A
lter
ated
lava
san
dre
cent
depo
sits
27.0
06.
1038
21.
232.
342.
000.
401.
723.
890.
3335
137
3
83L
e-I5
8M
arbl
esan
dsc
hist
s,ba
salt
s,re
cent
depo
sits
36.0
06.
501,
539
14.0
01.
237.
5316
.22
0.35
6.88
19.0
11.
9914
410
0
84L
e-I5
9M
arbl
es,
schi
sts,
rece
ntde
posi
ts47
.00
6.50
35,6
6439
.00
56.8
481
.03
460.
2011
.99
4.09
562.
0943
.41
156
114
85S
a-I6
0G
abbr
o,ba
salt
s,gr
anit
es54
.50
7.00
12,6
191.
8030
.39
164.
5313
.05
6.99
203.
970.
7824
422
3
86S
a-I6
1G
abbr
o,ba
salt
s,gr
anit
es49
.00
7.00
20,4
843.
8054
.20
268.
4417
.92
5.99
339.
941.
3122
820
2
87L
o-P
43M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
rece
ntde
posi
ts32
.10
7.40
1,73
15.
843.
9217
.75
0.53
5.25
20.6
92.
0516
512
5
88M
e-P
45M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
rece
ntde
posi
ts27
.50
6.40
27,5
4445
.70
42.6
01.
2269
.23
37.2
034
9.98
10.0
016
.17
406.
9442
.00
162
121
89M
e-P
45a
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,re
cent
depo
sits
30.0
06.
3016
,954
2.00
60.5
026
.00
42.5
023
.52
212.
486.
2512
.32
244.
9627
.32
164
124
90M
e-45
bM
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
rece
ntde
posi
ts28
.00
6.30
9,46
220
.00
43.2
01.
7123
.57
10.2
411
9.99
4.40
7.93
134.
9814
.70
180
142
91M
e-P
46M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
rece
ntde
posi
ts38
.00
6.40
9,29
112
7.80
59.7
00.
1622
.93
17.2
710
4.49
4.20
18.2
711
5.48
14.6
518
615
0
92M
e-P
46a
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,re
cent
depo
sits
22.5
06.
1539
,670
63.8
057
2.00
0.33
104.
451
.20
499.
9710
.00
27.4
757
7.92
56.0
013
995
93S
p-S
5Ju
rass
icli
mes
tone
s,op
hiol
ites
,qu
ater
nary
depo
sits
32.0
07.
3012
,821
19.1
330
.31
161.
075.
2510
.08
191.
0314
.26
171
132
94S
p-S
7M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts31
.40
7.70
8,72
213
.81
21.5
910
9.04
3.00
7.23
130.
029.
3016
011
8
95S
p-S
8M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts33
.00
7.20
10,9
6916
.81
28.2
013
6.06
3.50
10.2
716
2.03
11.7
415
511
3
96S
p-S
9M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts32
.26.
9010
,747
15.4
129
.20
133.
053.
5010
.11
158.
0311
.65
157
115
97S
p-S
10M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts28
.20
7.20
6,74
913
.21
16.7
980
.53
2.30
8.83
97.0
16.
9316
212
1
98S
p-S
12M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts37
.00
7.50
9,22
815
.81
26.5
910
8.04
3.20
14.1
912
9.82
8.87
164
124
99S
p-S
13M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts40
.00
6.90
9,13
816
.01
27.1
910
5.04
3.80
14.6
912
7.02
9.08
179
141
100S
p-S
14M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts33
.00
7.40
24,8
1847
.63
51.2
031
2.63
9.00
15.2
937
0.07
33.7
716
312
2
Tab
le1
(con
tinu
ed)
510
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Spr
ing
desi
gnat
ions
Lit
holo
gyT
�CP
HT
DS
(mg/
L)
SiO
2(m
g/L
)C
O2
(mg/
L)
H2S
(mg/
L)
Mg2
+
(mg/
L)
Ca2
+
(mg/
L)
Na+
(meq
/L)
K+
(meq
/L)
HC
O3
–
(meq
/L)
Cl–
(meq
/L)
SO
42–
(meq
/L)
Na/
KF
79�C
Na/
KT
r76
�C
101S
p-S
15M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts38
.00
7.00
19,2
9739
.19
40.0
424
2.10
6.50
11.5
728
8.05
26.6
615
811
6
102S
p-S
18M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
quat
erna
ryde
posi
ts,
trav
erti
nes
33.2
06.
1010
,514
1850
.04.
2019
.21
41.7
972
.03
4.20
36.6
899
.51
0.08
216
187
103S
p-S
34A
rgil
lite
san
dsa
nd-
ston
esof
flys
ch32
.60
9.15
325
43.4
06.
470.
180.
404.
880.
031.
403.
600.
3878
29
104E
u-S
112
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,ne
ogen
efo
rmat
ions
43.5
06.
5034
,061
24.0
050
.86
79.2
443
7.67
11.5
14.
4952
4.10
51.3
215
711
5
105E
u-S
113
Tra
vert
ines
72.2
06.
2034
,886
1342
0.0
27.6
265
.82
459.
2011
.40
8.81
541.
1024
.28
153
110
106E
-S11
4T
rave
rtin
es59
.00
6.10
33,8
4716
200.
026
.02
79.2
043
4.19
11.0
09.
9351
3.10
23.2
215
411
210
7Eu-
S11
5T
rave
rtin
es73
.00
6.15
33,7
4110
440.
027
.22
83.2
043
5.19
10.6
010
.73
521.
1023
.96
152
109
108E
-S11
6T
rave
rtin
es35
.80
6.10
30,4
8413
400.
025
.09
72.3
939
0.54
10.1
28.
8246
3.57
21.8
015
611
410
9Eu-
S11
7M
etam
orph
icro
cks
39.0
6.40
23,0
7659
.00
50.0
453
.20
306.
137.
008.
5737
7.07
2.93
147
104
110P
w-P
4M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes
28.0
07.
0032
,709
11.0
02.
800.
1763
.65
44.7
944
3.19
10.0
03.
1750
6.09
48.0
714
710
311
1Pw
-P9
Neo
gene
lim
esto
nes
and
sand
ston
es28
.00
7.90
1,05
119
.30.
203.
126.
0010
.80
0.02
8.08
7.00
5.70
32
112P
w-P
10M
esoz
oic
lim
esto
nes,
neog
ene
sand
ston
es28
.00
6.80
2,11
09.
007.
203.
543.
043.
3633
.31
0.30
8.73
26.4
04.
5296
47
113P
w-P
11N
eoge
nefo
rmat
ions
29.5
08.
2537
410
.90
0.20
1.68
3.55
1.38
0.14
3.45
1.10
2.11
269
255
114P
w-P
33C
reta
ceou
sli
mes
tone
s34
.50
7.40
16,5
5714
.60
28.0
010
.00
26.2
234
.59
212.
093.
503.
5722
4.04
48.2
912
882
115P
w-P
34C
reta
ceou
sli
mes
tone
s27
.50
7.40
1,95
37.
5012
.00
4.30
3.52
6.08
21.2
10.
403.
1422
.40
5.74
136
9111
6S-S
75F
lysc
h32
.57.
4592
51.
011.
924.
0010
.30
0.12
3.41
9.90
2.84
109
6111
7T-T
23F
lysc
h18
.00
7.70
615
16,0
063
.50
4.04
4.63
4.20
0.12
11.2
30.
201.
4416
212
111
8H-H
3P
aleo
cene
lim
esto
nes,
flys
ch,
allu
vium
30.5
7.40
1,22
822
.40
28.2
22.
725.
599.
700.
443.
4911
.40
3.66
196
165
119H
-H4
Pal
eoce
neli
mes
tone
,fl
ysch
,al
luvi
um28
.00
7.40
1,23
524
.90
19.3
22,
765.
599.
880.
433.
5211
.40
3.79
192
158
120H
-H5
Pal
eoce
neli
mes
tone
s,fl
ysch
,al
luvi
ums
30.0
07.
301,
223
23.1
032
.25
2.72
5.52
9.70
0.43
3.40
11.3
03.
6619
415
9
121H
-H23
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,re
cent
depo
sits
16.8
07.
102,
039
9.00
2.18
2.40
14.2
414
.50
0.40
2.56
15.8
013
.50
161
118
122H
-H24
Mes
ozoi
cli
mes
tone
s,re
cent
depo
sits
20.3
07.
154,
207
12.0
041
.00
4.80
8.00
55.0
21.
303.
8560
.26
5.18
150
107
Spr
ing
desi
gnat
ions
:th
efi
rst
part
com
pris
esth
ese
rial
num
ber
that
foll
ows
the
init
ials
ofth
esp
ring
loca
tion
.The
seco
ndpa
rtco
mpr
ises
the
corr
espo
ndin
gG
reek
wat
erde
part
men
tan
dth
esp
ring
’sse
rial
num
ber
take
nfr
omth
ere
port
sof
Gio
ni-S
tavr
opou
lou
1983
;O
rfan
os19
85;
Sfe
tsos
1988
.S
prin
glo
cati
ons:
AA
lexa
ndro
upol
isB
asin
,X
Xan
thi
basi
n,R
Mas
sof
Rho
dhop
e,D
Dra
mas
basi
n,S
Str
ymon
asba
sin,
MM
igdo
nia
basi
n,A
iAnt
hem
ous
basi
n,A
rA
ride
aba
sin,
FF
lori
naba
sin,
Ag
Isla
nds
ofA
gina
,Ky
Kyn
thos
,MiM
ilos
,KiK
imol
os,T
hiT
hira
,A
naA
nafi
,N
iN
isir
os,
Ko
Kos
,Ik
Ikar
ia,
Le
Les
vos,
SaS
amot
hrak
i,L
oL
outr
aki
Bas
in,
Me
Met
hana
Bas
in,
SpS
perc
hios
Bas
in,
Eu
Eub
oea
Isla
nd,
Pw
W.
Pel
opon
nesu
s,T
The
ssal
ia,
HE
piru
s.W
ater
Dep
artm
ents
:T
hT
hrac
e,M
Mac
edon
ia,
IIs
land
s,S
Ste
rea
Hel
las,
PP
elop
onne
sus,
TT
hess
alia
,H
Epi
rus
Tab
le1
(con
tinu
ed)
511
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Table 2 Isotopic composition of thermal-waters from the main thermal fields of Greece
Locations Springs d18O%o dD%o Locations Springs d18O%o dD%o
Gennisea (Xanthi Basin) 3X10 –6.24 –49.06 Lesvos 84Le9 +0.5 –0.6Eleytheres 11S10 –7.09 –49.82 Methana 88Me6 –4.80 –26.1Nigrita (Strimon Basin) 15S10 –8.71 –62.48 89Me5 –5.69 –30.2
25M8 –9.5 –67.3 Loutraki 87Lo5 –7.64 –44.7Volvi (Migdonia Basin)Lagadas (Migdonia Basin)
25M10 –9.35 –66.35 104Eu3 –0.37 +0.326M8 –9.3 –67.7 Edipsos (Euboea) 105Eu3 0.00 –0.927M8 –8.4 –59.6 106Eu3 –0.26 +2.2
Kynthos 40Ky7 –0.08 –1.2 Kamena Vourla (SperchiosBasin)Thermopyles (SperchiosBasin)Hypati (Sperchios Basin)
93Sp2 –4.91 –27.1Milos 43Mi7 +1.5 +6.5 95Sp –8.40 –48.6
42Mi7 –4.91 –24.6 96Sp2 –5.76 –31.3Ikaria 64Ik10 1.4 10.1 98Sp5 –7.30 –55.5Lesvos 76Le1 –4.94 –33.1 102Sp4 –7.90 –50.5
76Le6 –5.49 –32.7 Kyllini 112P10 –5.99 –33.276Le9 –5.3 –38.5 Kaiafas 114P10 –2.63 –11.174Le9 –4.7 –32.9
1 Papastamataki and Leonis 1982a, 1985 2 Papastamataki and Leonis 1982b 3 Papastamataki and Leonis 1982c4 Papastamataki and Leonis 1982d 5 Anonymous 1984 6 Barnes et al. 1986 7 Lohnert 19888 Poutoukis and Dotsika 1993 9 Michelot at al. 1993 10 Mitropoulos and Kita 1997
Fig. 1 Distribution map of the principal thermal waters of Greece
512
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
period. The area was shaped by strike-slip faulting andrelated extension processes. Tertiary basins are relatedand controlled by these faults that are associated with adifferent basin type and are parallel to the long axes of thebasins (Koukouvelas and Aydin 2002). In this way, theTertiary basins of northern Greece were formed. Thesefaults played a very significant role in allowing the ther-mal fluids to rise from their storage zones (reservoirs), toregional aquifers (Dimopoulos and Aggelidis 1986; An-dronopoulos 1967; Kolios 1985, 1986; Dimopoulos 1989;Traganos 1991). In these aquifers, thermal waters are lo-calized in neogene sediments such as sandstone, calcar-eous sandstone, and conglomerates with depths of over200 m (Kolios 1985; Karydakis and Kavouridis 1983;1989).
Deep thermal waters rising in western Peloponnesus,where volcanic manifestations are unknown, are also lo-
calized in sands and conglomerate intercalations of neo-gene formations (Kallergis and Lambrakis 1992, 1993).The tectonic formation of west Peloponnesus played asignificant role in the appearance of thermal springs. Thesprings are located on an axis parallel to WNS–ESE faults(Kiskyras 1962).
Thermal waters of the Loutraki-Sousaki area springsbelonging to the volcanic Aegean Island arc, which ex-perienced recent volcanic activity, are localized in Pleis-tocene conglomerates (Schroeder 1985; Fytikas and Ka-vouridis 1985). The rise of thermal water in the region isrelated to an active E–W trending fault system located inthe eastern part of the Golf of Corinth, which was levelbefore the deposition of the neogene sediments in thebasin of Corinth (Fytikas and Kavouridis 1985).
Apart from the above-mentioned springs, very impor-tant thermal fields of Methana and the islands of Milos,
Fig. 2 Classification of thethermal-water springs using theexpanded Durov diagram
Fig. 3 Logarithmic plots of relationships between concentration (meq/L) of chloride vs. sodium (a) and calcium (b) in Na–HCO3 typeGreek thermal waters
513
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Serifos, Syros, Paros, Thira, Ios, Naxos, Syfnos, Amor-gos, Kos, Nisiros and Euboea belong to the volcanicAegean island arc. Volcanic rocks are very commonabove a crystalline substratum that characterised all is-lands of the central Aegean (Durr et al. 1978; Boronkayand Doutsos 1994). During the Pleistocene, extensiveandesitic volcanism with different kinds of calc–alkalinepyroclastic products and lavas (Fytikas 1977) took placeon Lesvos, Milos, Thira and Nisyros. This volcanism,caused by thermal anomalies at relatively shallow depth,is proved by the presence of fumaroles on Milos andNisyros (Fytikas et al. 1989; Chiodini et al. 1993). Ther-mal waters rise to the surface either directly from thecrystalline substratum and volcanic rocks, or to smallalluvial aquifers in Quaternary deposits.
Quaternary deposits of the Sperchios Valley, very closeto Euboea Island, host the thermal waters of Ypati Springin conglomerates (Marinos and Frangopoulos 1973), as atKammena Vourla and Thermopyles (Orfanos and Sfetsos1975). The valley is delimited by WNW–ESE orientedfaults that relay thermal fields with the sea (Georgalas andPapakis 1966). Thermal waters also rise to the alluvialaquifers in the areas of Aridea (Tzimourtas 1986), Thermaof Xanthi, and the volcanic islands of the Aegean Sea.
Classification and Hydrochemical Characteristicsof Thermal SpringsThe expanded Durov diagram (Fig. 2; Lloyd 1965), whichis congener to the Langelier and Ludwig (1942) diagram,is used for a first classification of Greek thermal waters. Itis clear from the diagram that the waters can be groupedinto four main water types: Ca–HCO3 type, Mg–HCO3type, Na–HCO3 type, and the Na–Cl type.
Springs originating directly from crystalline rocks innorthern Greece (Aridea internal basin and the Rhodopemassif) belong to the first two types of thermal water(Ca–HCO3 and Ca–Mg–HCO3 type waters). These wa-ters have a small concentration of total dissolved solids(TDS; Table 1). After Ellis and Machon (1977) HCO3
�
waters are considered to occur in volcanic areas wheresteam containing CO2 condenses into the liquid phase.Giggenbach (1991) indicates that HCO3
� waters can alsoreflect interaction of CO2 charged fluids at lower tem-peratures as well as mixing with local groundwater.
Samples from the post-orogenic basins (Alexandrou-polis, Xanthi, Strimonas, Migdonia Basins) belong mainlyto the Na–HCO3 water type. Their content in TDS islower than that of the next type of Na–Cl waters in whichNa is considered to be derived from mixing with seawa-ter. The dominance of Na in these springs (see Fig. 3a,where the dotted line is the seawater mixing line) could becaused by the water’s increased alteration capacity due to
the high CO2 concentration that favours the solubility ofalkaline elements from silicic rocks (Ellis and Mahon1977). However, in some cases, ion exchange phenomenabetween Na and Ca could also be responsible for sodiumand calcium concentrations (samples from Alexandrou-polis-Xanthi Basin, Sperchios Basin, western Pelopon-nesus; Fig. 3b). The above-mentioned hydrochemicalprocess is also encountered in other geothermal areas withhigh CO2 levels as in the inner basin of Rhodope, inAnthemous Basin, in Lesvos Island and in SperchiosBasin.
Most of the samples were classified into the Na–Clwater type and are characterised by high TDS values anda Na/Cl ionic report of about 0.85, very close to that ofseawater (for seawater Na/Cl=0.84; Fig. 4a). This wa-ter type comprises almost all the samples from islandgeothermal fields and from coastal springs. Their chem-ical composition seems to be strongly affected by water ofsodium-chloride composition as Minissale et al. (1989;1997) have also shown.
Na–Cl type waters could be potentially equivalent toseawater mixing with meteoric water or waters havingdissolute marine evaporites or deep circulation of recentseawater. Aquilina et al. (2002), demonstrated that in theBalaruc thermal fluids, which are a mixture of karst wa-ters and waters of marine origin, the thermal end-memberis itself a mixture of seawater and meteoric palaeowater.Assuming that deep circulation of seawater was thesource of the dissolved salts, one would expect the waterto have the geochemical characteristics of seawater assuggested by the correlation between Na and Br in theislands (r>98%) (Fig. 4b).
Figure 4c exhibits two groups of samples with goodcorrelation between Cl and SO4 (r>98%). Most of thewater samples belong to the first group. The concordancebetween the thermal fluid regression line and the seawa-ter–rainwater mixing line, suggests the same origin ofthese ions: seawater. However, the small discrepancybetween the two lines, especially for the more salinesamples, could be attributed to increased amounts ofsulphates caused by the dilution of anhydride if brinesexist at depth, or to the oxidation of pyrite according tothe reaction, FeS2+4.75 O2+1.5 H2O+4e�$Fe(OH)3+2SO4
2� (Appelo and Postma 1993). Samples from Milos,Nisiros and Euboea Islands belong to the second watergroup, which presents a lack of SO4 in relation to the firstgroup. Divergences from the seawater–rainwater mixingline suggest modification of the original seawater bywater–rock interactions.
The depletion of magnesium (Fig. 4d) could be at-tributed to the ion exchange process at high temperaturein several calcium-magnesium silicate minerals (Ellis1971; Giggenbach 1988) or to the following reactionsthat, according to Schoeller and Schoeller (1985), couldbe taking place in crystalline rocks.
The first is that magnesium concentrations decreasewith temperature, and chlorite is formed from the fol-lowing reaction:
Fig. 4 Logarithmic plots of relationships between concentration(meq/L) of chemical species a chloride vs. Na/Cl, b chloride vs.bromide, c chloride vs. sulphates d chloride vs. magnesium, ecalcium vs. sulphates, f Mg/Ca vs. SO4/Ca, g chloride vs. boron, hchlorides vs. nitrates in Na–Cl type Greek thermal waters
515
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
KAl3Si3O10 OHð Þ2 þ 7:5Mgþ2 þ 1:5H4SiO4
þ9H2O$ 1:5MgAl2Si3O10 OHð Þ8 þ 14HþþKþ
Laumonite or prenite also are formed. The second re-action is that calcium concentrations should increase withdepth as a result of anorthite dilution via the reaction,CaAl2Si2O8+H2O+2H+$Ca+2+Al2Si2O5(OH)4. Hence, sea-water brings almost the totality of dissolved Cl, Br andSO4. In order to evaluate whether anhydride is diluted, thecorrelation line between Ca and SO4 is drawn.
In Fig. 4e, several groups of samples could be distin-guished. One group, suggesting a Ca/SO4 ratio of 1:1 as inthe dilution of anhydrite, comprises samples mainly fromIkaria Island where the above-mentioned mineral does notexist. Other groups suggesting Ca/SO4 ratios of 1.33:1 or3:1, comprise samples from Sperchios Basin or Euboeaand Milos islands respectively. Not having a clear imageabout these relationships, Fig. 4f with normalized con-centrations of SO4 and Mg to Ca, was drawn to differen-tiate the seawater and evaporate end-members (Aquilina etal. 2002). The regression line (r>98%) for the majority ofthe samples is almost in concordance with the seawater–rainwater mixing-line. A few samples from western Pelo-ponnesus and the Anthemous Basin where anhydrite exists,are in discrepancy with the line towards the anhydritecorner, and suggest that dissolution of this mineral may beresponsible for the sulphate enrichment of thermal water.
Intensified water–rock interactions are obvious in is-lands thermal waters for which boron determinations areavailable. In Fig. 4g, samples from Nisyros, Milos, Les-vos, Kythnos and Euboea Islands with an excess of Brelative to Cl could be attributed to intensified water–rockinteractions. Additionally, nitrate concentrations that existin most of the samples (Fig. 4h), indicates the participa-tion of fresh water.
It should be noted that in addition to the mixing ofthermal with cold, fresh and seawater, cases of fractionalmagmatic water participation should not be ruled out. Forexample, while drilling on the island of Thira, thermaland mineral water was located which had a TDS contentof 53.223 gr/L (Kavouridis et al. 1982), higher than thatof seawater. According to Chiodini et al. (1994), the in-creased values of TDS may be due to the presence ofmantle fluids in Thira Island (Palea and Nea Kameni).
Isotopic Composition of Thermal and Mineral Waters
Table 2 presents values of the stable isotopes in water(d18O and dD) for the main geothermal fields in Greece.The d18O and dD diagram in Fig. 5 has been drawn usingdata where Greek rainfall areas have also been drawnaccording to Chiodini et al. (1994).
The position of many thermal waters from Euboea,Kynthos, Milos and Lesvos Islands are very close to meansea water (SMOW) indicating their purely marine origin.Thermal waters from Sperchios, Migdonia, Loutraki Ba-sins, Methana and West Peloponnesus area are close to
the meteoric rainfall area. Thermal waters from Komoti-ni-Xanthi, Srimonas, Sperchios Basins and Lesvos Island,show strong meteoric contribution while their positionunder the meteoric water area could mean mixing withseawater.
The above results are in accordance with observationin the previous section where it is mentioned that thermalsprings rising close to the sea are strongly affected byseawater that enters the hydrological circuit.
Diluted CO2 and H2S Gases in Thermaland Mineral Waters
From Table 1 it can be seen that many thermal andmineral waters contain increased amounts of dissolvedCO2 and H2S gases. Springs with high CO2 concentra-tions are located in the basins of Strimonas, Aridea, An-themous and Sperchios. The majority of these springshave CO2 levels varying between 200 to 1,850 mg L�1.After Barnes et al. (1986), according to stable d13C inCO2 isotope data, the origin of CO2 in thermal fields ofGreece is the result of the thermometamorphism of ma-rine limestones. This process also occurs in other similargeothermal areas (Nuti et al. 1980).
Thermal and mineral waters containing H2S are en-countered in the basins of Strimonas, Migdonia andSperchios, the area of Methana, the western Pelopon-nesus, and Epirus. Hydrogen sulphate (H2S) results fromthe reduction of sulphate ions under suitable conditionsand in the presence of bacteria. It may also derive fromthe oxidation of pyrite and the anaerobic alteration of
Fig. 5 d18O and d2H composition of thermal and mineral waters ofthe main geothermal springs in Greece. Hellenic rainfall area afterChiodini et al. (1994)
516
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
organic matter. In the western Peloponnesus, H2S is pro-duced from the reduction of sulphates present in thegypsum of Trias (Kallergis and Lambrakis 1992). Thiscould also be the case in the areas of Methana andSperchios. According to Poutoukis and Dotsika (1993), inthe Migdonia Basin, H2S is produced from the reductionof pyrite-derived sulphate, although it is much more likelythat CO2 produces a solution that is acid, and pyrite isaltered according to the following type of reaction:
FeS2 þ Hþ ! Feþ2 þ H2S
Geothermometry
As made clear in the previous paragraphs, groundwatersof Greek thermal springs acquire their chemical compo-sition at depth by interacting with silicic rocks bearingalkaline elements and some carbonates (mainly marbles).However, they also interact with shallow aquifers orseawaters. In most cases, except for the islands, theseshallow aquifers are located in the neogene sediments.
The degree of water–rock interaction in all sampleswas determined by calculating the saturation index of theminerals calcite (SIC), dolomite (SId), gypsum (SIg), chal-cedony (SICh) and quartz (SIQ) using the Phreeqc pro-gram. The above saturation frequency index diagramsshow that most Greek thermal waters are over-saturated incalcite and dolomite (Fig. 6). The only negative values areencountered in samples of Lesvos and Milos Islandswhere the contribution of Ca and Mg bearing minerals isnot significant due to the dominating volcanic rocks inthe islands. Almost all thermal waters are unsaturated ingypsum while the majority are saturated in quartz and lesssaturated in chalcedony. Thermal waters unsaturated inchalcedony are encountered in samples from the westernPeloponnesus and Epirus, Strimonas Basin and the islandsof Nisyros, Ikaria, and Lesvos. Consequently, chemicalgeothermometers are presented, based on the mineralswith the highest grades of saturation. Moreover, as seenfrom Table 3, several geothermometers lead to unac-cepted temperature values.
Table 3 and Fig. 7 show statistics from the applicationof selected geothermometers. Fig. 7 shows that whendifferent geothermometers are applied, the estimated tem-
Fig. 6 Frequency diagrams for calcite, dolomite, gypsum, chalcedony and quartz saturation indexes
517
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
peratures differ. The mean estimated temperatures for allthe thermal springs as calculated by the Na, K and Cabased geothermometers, are similar and vary between 149and 187 �C (Table 3). The geothermometers of Truesdell1975 and Fournier 1979 (Table 4) provided the closesttemperature compared to that measured in wells drilled inMilos Island at 1,000–1,400-m depth that is greater than
300 �C (Fytikas 1978). According to Liakopoulos et al.(1991), that temperature is 318 �C. This could be taken asevidence that in Milos thermal water, a full equilibriumhas been achieved between rocks and water in the storagezone. The geothermometers based on SiO2 and Mg cor-rection show values that differ from previous values. It isknown that the Na–K–Ca–Mg geothermometer can be
Table 3 Statistical parametersfrom geothermometer applica-tion concerning the estimatedtemperature of thermal waters.SD standard deviation
Minimum Maximum Average SD Var%
SiO2 Am1 –114.0 20.0 –43.774 26.645 670.0SiO2 CriA2 –64.0 96.0 20.86 31.391 167.0SiO2 CriB3 –100.0 47.0 –23.538 29.059 313.0SiO2 Chalc4 –53.0 120.0 38.538 34.243 144.0SiO2 Qz5 –21.0 146.0 69.86 32.513 114.0Na/K FOUR736 –30.0 505.0 149.081 81.664 106.0Na/K TR757 –18.0 468.0 154.306 74.989 104.0Na/K FOUR798 32.0 410.0 187.427 59.454 92.0K/Mg GIG839 –26.0 85.0 43.726 13.684 131.0Na–K–Ca10 6.0 292.0 169.065 38.238 98.0Na–K–Ca–Mg11 17.0 204.0 72.862 46.744 92.01 Fournier 1977 2 Fournier 1977 3 Fournier 1977 4 Fournier 19735 Fournier and Rowe 1966 6 Fournier 1973 7 Truesdell 1975 8 Fournier 19799 Giggenbach et al. 1983 10 Fournier and Truesdell 1973 11Fournier and Potter 1979
Fig. 7 Frequency diagrams for the estimated temperatures using the quartz, Na/K, N/Mg, Na–K–Ca and Na–K–Ca–Mg geothermometers
518
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
used in cases where thermal waters mix with cold freshwaters, which is the case for all neogene and tertiarybasins. Saline water contribution, however, greatly re-duces the reliability of this geothermometer. The lowvalues obtained by the SiO2 geothermometers could beexplained by low silicate contents in the storage zone(metamorphosed carbonates rocks in many cases) and/orby partial equilibration of water–rock due to short contacttimes.
Using the above six geothermometers (Table 4), theareas with the highest estimated temperatures are Milos,Lesvos, and Nisyros Islands, and Xanti geothermal field.
Conclusions
In this paper, the basic hydrogeological and hydrochem-ical characteristics of the Greek geothermal areas are pre-sented and the origin of thermal and mineral spring watersis investigated. These springs occur mainly in the post-orogenic basins of the northern Aegean and the Aegeanisland arc. Geothermal areas are related to recent volcanicactivity and active tectonics. Fluid movement is due tovolcanic activity and a thermal gradient leading to con-vection. This is the case for the majority of springs withinareas of Tertiary basins of northern Greece and the Ae-gean island arc. In western Greece, where volcanic ac-tivity does not exist, the thermal gradient is due only todepth.
Spring waters in islands and coastal areas are typical ofmarine solutions and result from the mixing of deep ther-mal reservoir water and with meteoric water. In conti-nental areas, thermal water rising from deep reservoirs isfrequently localized in aquifers of neogene sedimentssuch as conglomerates and sandstones, while in somecases it is mixed with karst surface water.
Chemical data combined with isotopic data classifiedthermal springs into four types of water that originatefrom marine and non-marine sources. The most importanttype that belong to marine sources, has a Na/Cl ratio ofabout 0.85, comprises the spring waters of island andcoastal regions, and is of the Na–Cl type. In some cases(e.g. Euboea and Lesvos Islands), it seems that thermalwaters are due to direct seawater infiltration. However,the contribution of mantle fluids should not be excludedat least in the more recent volcanic islands (Chiodini et al.1994). The other three water types originate from non-
marine sources. The Na–HCO3 type occurs in the internalareas of post-orogenic basins (e.g. Strimonas, Migdonia,etc.). High amounts of CO2 contribute to the chemicalcomposition of these waters and favour the solubility ofalkaline elements such as Na, from siliciceous rocks. Ionexchange phenomena between Ca of the waters and Nafrom clay minerals should not be excluded, and con-tributes to the increase of Na content. The two remainingwater types, Ca–HCO3 and Mg–HCO3, are considered tobe associated with local groundwater.
The presence of CO2 in the thermal and mineral watersstudied is due to the metamorphism of marine carbonates.The occurrence of H2S in spring waters of the MigdoniaBasin is due to the alteration of pyrite, while in thePeloponnesus it is due to the reduction of sulphates orig-inating from dissolved gypsum.
Geothermometric analysis is related to mean temper-atures between 149 and 187 �C. These temperatures areprobably due to a normal gradient, given that the depth ofthe post-orogenic basin of Greece is thought to be greaterthan 4,000 m. The most promising geothermal fields ofGreece are encountered in the Milos, Lesvos, and NisyrosIslands and Xanthi Basin.
Acknowledgments The authors wish to express their gratitude tothe Editor and the referees for their careful readings of the manu-scripts. Their comments, suggestions, and remarks proved indis-pensable in helping us improve the style and presentation of thispaper.
References
Anonymous (1984) Methana-Poros, Loutraki-Sousaki, Platystomo:Aidipsos geothermal projects. Final report, Geothermica Ital-iana Sr 1, ENEL, Italy
Andronopoulos B (1967) The mineralisation of the Therma area,Xanthi, northern Greece (in Greek). Geological reconnaissanceReport No. 40, IGSR, Athens
Appelo CAJ, Postma D (1993) Geochemistry, groundwater andpollution. Balkema, Rotterdam
Aquilina L, Ladouche B, Doerfliger N, Seidel JL, Bakalowicz M,Dupuy C, Le Strat P (2002) Origin, evolution and residencetime of thermal fluids (Balaruc Springs, southern France): im-plications for fluid transfer across the continental shelf. ChemGeol 192:1–24
Barnes I, Leonis C, Papastamataki A (1986) Stable-isotope tracingof the origin of CO2 discharges in Greece (in Greek). In: MorfisA, Paraskevopoulou P (eds) Proc 5th Int Symp UndergroundWater Tracing, Athens, pp 29–43
Table 4 The maximum estimated temperatures (in paranthesis) using the six selected geothermometers
Geothermometers Springs with higher estimate temperatures (�C)
SiO2 Qz 45Mi (146), 42Mi(138), 9R (130), 74Le (123), 32Ai (120) 56Ni (114), 78Le (111), 76Le (106)Na/K (Fournier 1973) 53Ana (460), 83Le (390), 43Mi (366), 42Mi (357), 5X (299), 72Le (298), 6,7R (281), 55Ni (225), 54Ni (205)Na/K (Truesdell 1975) 82Le (373), 43Mi (341), 80Le (314), 21S (298), 45Mi (285), 5X (258), 72Le (257), 17S (244)Na/K (Fournier 1979) 82Le (351), 43Mi (330), 42Mi (322), 80Le (311), 21S (299), 45Mi (290), 21S (283), 5X (271), 54Ni (188),
55Ni (205)Na–K–Ca (Fournier 1973) 43Mi (292), 42Mi (283), 53Ana (270), 45Mi (230), 71Sa (225), 17S (213), 4X (210), 55Ni (209), 54Ni (202)Na–K–Ca–Mg (Fournierand Potter 1979)
42Mi (176), 43Mi (176), 5X (160), 12S (149), 13S (153), 7R (152), 6R (149), 11S (149), 8R (136), 14S (130)
519
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
Boronkay K, Doutsos T (1994) Transpression and transtensionwithin different structural levels in the central Aegean region.J Struct Geol 16(11)1555–1573
Chiodini G, Cioni R, Leonis C, Marini L, Raco B (1993) Fluidgeochemistry of Nisni Ayros Island, Dodecanese, Greece.J Volcanol Geotherm Res 56:95–112
Chiodini G, Cioni R, Dotsika E, Fytikas M, Leonis C, Magro G,Marini L, Michelot JL, Poutoukis D, Raco B (1994) Fluidgeochemistry for the volcanic surveillance of Thera Island. In:Proc Int Worksh European Lab Volcanoes, September 1994,Catania, pp 193–196
Dimopoulos G (1989) Preliminary Hydrothermal-Geothermal In-vestigations of Nigrita Serres Geothermal Fields (C. Mace-donia, Greece). Steirische Beitrage zur Hydrogeologie 41,Joannenum Research, Graz
Dimopoulos G, Aggelidis Z (1986) Alexandroupolis’s area thermalwaters. In: Proc 1st Int Congr Thermal and Mineral Waters inGreece and the Development of Spa Towns (in Greek). Thes-saloniki, 20–23 October 1985, pp 113–132
Durr S, Altherr R, Keller, Okrusch M, Seidel E (1978) The medianAegean crystalline belt: stratigraphy, structure, metamorphism,magmatism. In: Cloos L, Roeder D, Schmidt K (eds) Alps,Apennines, Hellenides. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart, pp 455–476
Ellis AJ (1971) Magnesium ion concentrations in the presence ofMg-chlorite, calcite, carbon dioxide, and quartz. Am J Sci271:481–489
Ellis AJ, Mahon WA (1977) Chemistry and geothermal systems.Academic Press, New York
Fournier RO (1973) Silica in thermal waters: laboratory and fieldinvestigations. In: Proc Int Symp Hydrogeochemistry andBiochemistry, Tokyo, September 1970, pp 122–139
Fournier RO (1977) Chemical geothermometers and mixing modelsfor geothermal systems. Geothermics 5:41–50
Fournier RO (1979) A revised equation for Na-K geothermometer.Geotherm Resourc Counc Trans 3:221–224
Fournier RO, Potter RW (1979) Magnesium correction to theNa–K–Ca chemical geothermometer. Geochim CosmochimActa 43:1543–1550
Fournier R, Rowe J (1966) Estimation of underground temperaturesfrom silica content of waters from hot springs and wet steamwells. Am J Sci 264:685–697
Fournier RO, Truesdell AH (1973) An empirical Na–K–Cageothermometer for natural waters. Geochim Casmochim Acta37:1255–1275
Fytikas M (1977) Geological and Geothermal study of Milos island(in Greek). PhD Thesis, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Fyticas M (1978) Geothermal situation in Greece. Geothermics17:549–556
Fytikas M, Kavouridis T (1985) Geothermalo area of Sousaki-Loutrakiki. In: Geothermics, thermal–mineral waters and hy-drogeology (in Greek). Theophrastus, Athens, pp 19–34
Fytikas M, Kolios N (1979) Preliminary heat flow map of Greece.In: Cermak V, Rybach L (eds) Terrestrial heat flow in Europe.Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 197–205
Fytikas M, Innocenti F, Manetti P, Mazzuoli R, Peccerillo A,Villari L (1984) Tertiary to Quaternary evolution of volcanismin the Aegean region. Geological Society of London, Spec.Publ. 17, pp 687–699
Fytikas M, Garnish JD, Hutton YRS, Staroste E, Wohlenberg J(1989) An integrated model for the geothermal field of Milosfrom geophysical experiments. Geothermics 18:611–621
Georgalas G, Papakis N (1966) Observations sur les sources ordi-naires et thermominerales radioactives de la region karstique deKammena Vourla (Gr�ce Centrale). In: Knjiga N (ed) Proc IntAssoc Hydrogeologists, vol VI. Beogradski graficki zavod,Beograd, Athens, pp 221–227
Gioni-Stavropoulou G (1983) Inventory of thermal and mineralsprings of Greece, I, Aegean sea (in Greek). Hydrological andHydrogeological Investigation Report No. 39, IGME, Athens
Giggenbach WF (1988) Geothermal solute equilibria; derivationof Na–K–Mg–Ca geoindicators. Geochim Cosmochim Acta52:851–861
Giggenbach WF (1991) Chemical techniques in geothermal ex-ploration. In: D’ Amore F (ed) Application of geochemistry ingeothermal reservoir development. UNITAR/UNDP, Rome,pp 119–142
Giggenbach WF, Gonfiantini R, Jangi BL, Truesdell AH (1983)Isotopic and chemical composition of Parbati Valley geother-mal discharges, NW Himalaya, India. Geothermics 12:199–222
Kallergis G, Lambrakis N (1992) Contribution a l’ etude dessources thermominarales de Gr�ce: les sources thermomin-erales de Kaiafa. Hydrogeologie 3:127–136
Kallergis G, Lambrakis N (1993) Contribution a l’ etude dessources thermominarales de Gr�ce: les sources thermomin-erales de Kyllini par rapport au regime hydrothermal du Pelo-ponese accidental. Steir Beitr Hydrogeol 44:207–220
Karydakis G, Kavouridis T (1983) Geothermal investigations in thearea of Lithotopos Heraklias Serron (in Greek). Internal report,IGME, Athens, 53 pp
Karydakis G, Kavouridis T (1989) Geothermal investigations oflow enthalpy in the area of Sidirokastron Serron (in Greek).Internal report, IGME, Athens, 36 pp
Kavouridis T, Karydakis G, Kolios N, Kouris D, Fytikas M (1982)Geothermal investigations in Thira Island (in Greek). Internalreport, IGME, Athens, 14 pp
Kiskyras D (1962) The thermal and mineral springs of Pelopon-nesus Peloponnesian (in Greek). Protochronia 6:103–109
Kolios N (1985) Geothermal investigations in the area of Potamias,S. Kessanis, Xanthi (in Greek). Internal report, 28 pp, IGME,Athens
Kolios N (1986) Geothermal investigations in the area of theeastern basin of Nestos (in Greek). Internal report, 56 pp,IGME, Athens
Koukouvelas I, Aydin A (2002) Fault structure and related basins ofthe North Aegean Sea and its surroundings. Tectonics 21:10–17
Langelier WF, Ludwing HF (1942) Graphical methods for indi-cating the mineral character of natural waters. J Am WaterAssoc 34:335–352
Liakopoulos A, Katerinopoulos A, Markopoulos T, Boulegue J(1991) A mineralogical petrographic and geochemical study ofsamples from well in the geothermal field of Milos island(Greece). Geothermics 20:237–256
Lloyd JW (1965) The hydrochemistry of the aquifers of north-eastern Jordan. J Hydrol 3:319–330
Lohnert PE (1988) Contribution to the origin of thermal-mineralspring waters on the islands of Milos and Kynthos (Aegean Sea,Greece). N Jb Geol Palaont Mh, 7:403–414
Marinos P, Frangopoulos I (1973) La source thermomineraled’Hypati (Gr�ce Centrale). Etude Hydrogeologique, Hydrody-namique, Geochimique et Geotechnique de la source et de saregion environnante, decouverte d’un nouveau foyer ther-momineral (i French). Ann Geol Pays Helleniques 25:105–214
Michelot JL, Dotsika E, Fytikas M (1993) A hydrochemical andisotopic study of thermal waters on Lesvos Island (Greece).Geothermics 22:91–99
Minissale A,Vittorio D, Kolios N, Totaro G (1989) Geochemicalcharacteristics of Greek thermal springs. J Volcanol GeothermRes 39:1–16
Minissale A, Duchi V, Kolios N, Nocenti M, Verrucci C (1997)Chemical patterns of thermal aquifers in the volcanic islands ofthe Aegean Arc, Greece. Geothermics 26:501–518
Mitropoulos P, Kita I (1997) Geochemistry of oxygen and hydro-gen isotopes in Greek regional waters (in Greek). In: Proc 4thHydrogeol Congr Hydrogeol, 14–16 November 1997, Thessa-loniki, Commission of Greece, Athens, pp 285–291
Nuti S, Noto P, Ferrara G (1980) The system H2O–CO2–CH4–H2 atTravale, Italy: tentative interpretation. Geothermics 9:287–295
Orfanos G (1985) Inventory of thermal and mineral springs ofGreece, Peloponnesus, Zakynthos, Kythira (in Greek). Hydro-logical and Hydrogeological Investigation Report No. 39,IGME, Athens
Orfanos G, Sfetsos C (1975) Hydrogeological investigation inKammena Vourla area (Radioactives waters) (in Greek). Hy-
520
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x
drological and Hydrogeological Investigation Report No. 16,IGMR, Athens
Papastamataki A, Leonis C (1982a) Geochemical study forGeothermics I, Lesvos Island (in Greek). Internal report, 32 pp,IGME, Athens
Papastamataki A, Leonis C (1982b) Geochemical study forGeothermics II, Platystomon area (in Greek). Internal report,IGME, Athens, 16 pp
Papastamataki A, Leonis C (1982c) Geochemical study forGeothermics III, Edipsos area (in Greek). Internal report,IGME, Athens, 18 pp
Papastamataki A, Leonis C (1982d) Geochemical study forGeothermics IV, Ypati area (in Greek). Internal report, IGME,Athens, 16 pp
Papastamataki A, Leonis C (1985) The origin of PolichnitosSprings. In: Geothermics, thermal–mineral waters and hydro-geology. Theophrastus, Athens pp 141–149
Pe-Piper G, Piper DJW (1989) Spatial and temporal variation inLate Cenozoic Back-arc volcanic rocks, Aegean Sea region.Tectonophysics 169:113–134
Poutoukis D, Dotsika E (1993) Hydrochemical and isotopical re-search of the Lagada-Volvi region waters (in Greek). In: Proc2nd Nat Hydrogeological Congress, 24–28 November 1994,Patras, pp 679–689
Schoeller H, Schoeller M (1985) Study of the chemical composi-tion of a thermal water in its circuit, in crystalline terrain, in thePyrenees mountains, France. In: Geothermics, thermal–mineralwaters and hydrogeology, Theophrastus, Athens, pp 71–96
Sfetsos SC (1988) Inventory of thermal and mineral springs ofGreece, III, Continental Greece (in Greek). Hydrological andHydrogeological Investigation Report No. 39, IGME, Athens,667 pp
Shroeder B (1985) Structural evolution and mineral, thermalsprings of the Neogene basin at the Isthmus of Corinth, Greece.In: Geothermics, thermal–mineral waters and hydrogeology,Theophrastus, Athens, pp 111–119
Traganos G (1991) The present state and results of the second phaseof geothermal investigation in Mygdonia (in Greek). Geologi-cal and geophysical research report, IGME, Athens
Truesdell AH (1975) Geochemical techniques in exploitation. In:Proc 2nd UN Symp on Development and Use of GeochemicalResources, vol 1. San Francisco, US Governmental PrintingOffice, Washington DC, pp 53–79
Tzimourtas S (1986) Thermal and mineral springs of the Almopiazone (in Greek). In: Proc 1st Int Congr Thermal and MineralWaters and the Development of Spa Towns. 20–23 October1985, Thessaloniki, pp 103–112
521
Hydrogeology Journal (2005) 13:506–521 DOI 10.1007/s10040-004-0349-x