Gravity Modeling 3

25
Ali Oncel [email protected] .sa Department of Earth Sciences KFUPM Gravity Modeling 3 Introduction to Geophysics troduction to Geophysics-KFUP Highest peaks on the planet

Transcript of Gravity Modeling 3

Page 1: Gravity Modeling 3

Ali [email protected]

Department of Earth SciencesKFUPM

Gravity Modeling 3

Introduction to GeophysicsIn

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Highest peaks on the planet

Page 2: Gravity Modeling 3

Quiz of the Week

What does a positive Bouguer anomaly indicate? How about a negative Bouguer anomaly?

10 minutes

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 3: Gravity Modeling 3

Previous Lecture

Regional Gravity due to dipping plane Sources of the Local and Regional Gravity Anomalies Wavelength Changes of Anomaly regarding the burial depth of material Factors effecting the Gravity Anomalies

Density Contrast Depth to anomaly Source Geometry

Gravity Effect of Sphere Depth Estimates

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 4: Gravity Modeling 3

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Bouguer Anomaly Map of Anatolia

www.mta.gov.tr

Page 5: Gravity Modeling 3

Gravity stations in Saudi Arabia508397 points

Saudi Geological SurveyIntr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 6: Gravity Modeling 3

Bouguer gravityDensity 2.3 gm cm-3

Bouguer Anomaly Map of Saudi Arabia

Saudi Geological Survey

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 7: Gravity Modeling 3

Half Width Depth Estimates

• The depth to the top of a gravity source can be determined approximately from half-width x½ of anomaly x½ is half distance from the centre of anomaly at which amplitude has decreased to half its peak value Z is depth for spherical object z = 1.305x½

z = 1.305x½

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 8: Gravity Modeling 3

Other Objects

Effects of various bodies can be written by inserting term for object volume and density contrast into gravity equation

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 9: Gravity Modeling 3

Gradient-Amplitude Method

• Z is depth which also can be estimated to source based on the gradient of the anomaly side slopes •depth found from ratio of maximum amplitude to

gradient z < 0.86 Δg max / Δ g‘ max

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 10: Gravity Modeling 3

Ambiguity in Gravity Interpretation

Gravity interpretations are ‘non-unique’• infinite number of combinations of object geometry, depth and density contrast can yield the same anomaly

There are two approached to the interpretation of Bouguer anomaly data. One is direct where the original data are analysed to produce an interpretation. The other is indirect, where models are constructed to

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 11: Gravity Modeling 3

An infinite slab adds or subtracts a constant amount to the gravity field, depending on whether the slab represent a positive (+Δm) or negative (-Δm) mass anomaly.

Gravity variation due to Infinite Slab

+Δm = +Δgz

-Δm = -Δgz

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 12: Gravity Modeling 3

1. No significant gravity effect in regions far from the slab;

Gravity variation due to semi-infinite Slab

3. The full (positive or negative) gravity effect in regions over the slab but far from the edge

The gravity effect of a semi-infinite slab changes gradually as the edge of the slab is crossed as in the following:

2. An increase or decrease in gravity crossing the edge of the slab;

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 13: Gravity Modeling 3

An infinite slab produces exactly the same gravity as the slab used for the Bouguer correction as:

Δgz =0.0419ΔρΔh

Estimating Δgz for an infinite slab

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 14: Gravity Modeling 3

1. The gravity effect of a semi-infinite slab is equal to the Bouguer slab approximation far out over the slab (right),

Estimating Δgz for an infinite slabGravity effect of a semi-infinite slab changes

according to position relative to the slab’s edge.

2. ½ of that value directly over the slab’s edge, and zero far away from the edge (left). In

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 15: Gravity Modeling 3

Δgz versus Slab’s positionIn

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 16: Gravity Modeling 3

The angle Ф can be expressed: Ф = π/2 + tan -1 (x/z)

Ф=90 (Away from the slab) Ф > π/2 (Over the slab)

Griffiths and King (1981) develop an equation for the anomaly caused by a semi-infinite slab:

Δgz= G (Δρ) (Δh) (2Ф)

Ф= angle (in radians) from the observation point, between the horizontal surface and a line drawn to the central plane at the slab’s edge

Gravity for Semi-Infinite Slab

G=Universal Gravitational Constant (6.67x10-11 Nm2/kg2).

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 17: Gravity Modeling 3

Gravity for Semi-Infinite Slab

1. X=- ∞ Δgz=zero Δgz=0 (41.9 Δρ Δh)

2. X=- z Δgz=¼ its full value Δgz=¼ (41.9 Δρ Δh)

3. X=- ∞ Δgz=½ its full value Δgz=½ (41.9 Δρ Δh)

4. X=+ z Δgz=¾ its full value Δgz=¾ (41.9 Δρ Δh)

5. X=+ ∞ Δgz=its full value Δgz=1 (41.9 Δρ Δh)

Δgz= 13.34 (Δρ) (Δh) (π/2 + tan-1 [x/z]

Units are:Δgz in g/cm3 Δρ in g/cm3 Δh, x, z in km

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 18: Gravity Modeling 3

Fundamentals of gravity anomalies

1. Amplitude of Δgz : reflecting either the excess (+Δm) or deficit (-Δm) of mass , which depends on density contrast (Δρ) and thickness (Δh).

2. The gradient of Δgz : reflecting the depth of –Δm or +Δm below the surface (z).In

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 19: Gravity Modeling 3

Passive continental margin

ρwater = 1.03 g/cm3

ρcrust = 2.67 g/cm3

ρmantle = 3.1 g/cm3

Thickness for the ocean side:hw =water column = 5 km

(hc)o =crust column = 8km

hmantle column = ?Thickness for the continent side (hc) c = thickness of the continental crust=? kmIn

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 20: Gravity Modeling 3

Passive continental margin

Mass excess of mantle (+Δm):

exerting a force onto oceanic crust to pull downward.

Equal Pressure: ρc (hc)c = ρw (hw) + ρc (hc)o + ρm (hm)

Equal Thickness: (hc)c = (hw) + (hc)o + (hm)

Solving the two equations for the unknown parameters:

(hc)c=31.84 km

hm=18.84 km

Mass deficit due to subsided ocean basin (-Δm): it has been filled by enough water to establish an isostatic equilibrium by airy model.

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 21: Gravity Modeling 3

Water contribution on Gravity

The negative contribution to the gravity anomaly is an abrupt change, along a steep gradient where the water deepens.

Δρ=ρw-ρc

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 22: Gravity Modeling 3

The mass excess (Δm) that compensates the shallow water relates to the amount of shallowing of the mantle (hm) times difference between mantle and the crustal densities (Δρ=ρm-ρc=0.43 g/cm3).

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 23: Gravity Modeling 3

ΔgFA anomaly for the passive margin model is the sum of the contributions from the shallow (water) and deep mantle effects. The anomaly through the interiors of the continent and ocean is near zero but a maximum over the continental edge and a minimum over the edge of ocean is shown up. This gravity coupling as positive/negative is known

as edge effect, since the contributions due to the shallow and deep source have different gradient.

Free Air Gravity AnomalyIn

trod

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 24: Gravity Modeling 3

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM

Page 25: Gravity Modeling 3

Free air/ Bouguer Gravity anomalies

Isostatic equilibrium means the absolute value of excess (+Δm) mass equals the absolute value of deficient mass (-Δm).

Bouguer anomaly after applied Bouguer correction to Free Air anomaly.

Intr

od

uct

ion t

o G

eop

hysi

cs-K

FUPM