Government-wide Enterprise Architecture 2/Session 2_6_Ms. Inhee Hwang.pdfGEA portal D-brain N-Tops...
Transcript of Government-wide Enterprise Architecture 2/Session 2_6_Ms. Inhee Hwang.pdfGEA portal D-brain N-Tops...
Government-wide Enterprise Architecture in Korea
The citizen friendly approach of
e-government Integration
1
Current Architecture Target Architecture
Business
Data
Application
Technical
Security
Transition Plan
Business
Data
Application
Technical
Security
1
National Initiatives
Agency A
IT
Planning
National IT Strategic Plan
Agency B
IT
Planning
Agency C
IT
Planning
Agency D
IT
Planning
Government - Level
Agency A
IT
Resources
Optimized
An Integrative View Needed
Agency B
IT
Resources
Optimized
Agency C
IT
Resources
Optimized
Agency D
IT
Resources
Optimized
Redundant IT investments occurred due to agency-level IT management
No processes or systems for government-wide IT resource management have been in placed.
Weak alignment between national IT directions and agency’s IT projects
Identifying duplicate resource is required IT Projects must be aligned with the national IT directions
2
PLAN (Budget, Strategy)
GEA Objectives
Strategy alignment
IT portfolio management
SEE (Monitor, Evaluate)
DO (Implement, Deploy)
New business initiative
Budget justification
Guidelines and reference models
Architecture management
Governm
ent-wide Level
Agency-level
Redundancy
monitoring
Performance
evaluation
Shared
service
Program
management
Gov. Public Service
GEA Framework, Reference models, Guidelines
Agency Service
Agency-level Framework, Reference models
Align Align
As-Is Arch
To-Be Arch
Transition Plans
As-Is Arch
To-Be Arch
Transition Plans
3
4
A blueprint for national informatization:
realizing integrated management
Efforts to nurture architects & disseminate
success cases
Saving budget & reducing costs
Promoting GEA through strong institutional
supports
Pioneers & a new world
1. GEA Concept & Framework
2. GEA Vision & Strategy
3. Vertical alignment
4. Horizontal alignment
5. Cross-sectorial collaboration mechanism
A blueprint for national informatization: realizing integrated management
5
GEA Concept & Framework
GEA Objectives
Guidelines and Reference models
Architecture management
Gove
rnm
ent-
wid
e le
vel
Agency-le
vel
Gov. Public Service
GEA Framework, Reference Models, Guidelines
Agency Service
Agency - Level Framework, Reference Models
Align
As-Is Arch.
To-Be Arch.
Transition Plans
As-Is Arch.
To-Be Arch.
Transition Plans
GEA
IT management
Update GEA Plan
IT Investment life-cycle
Do See
Plan
IT Investment life-cycle
Do See
Collect Agency
EA Assessment
EA Plan
Update Agency EA
Align GEA
Align Align
GEA Repository
Agency EA
Agency …
Inherit Update
It is the most effective management system which governs national IT projects, plans, and resources
1
6
Enhancement of government
efficiency
Central coordination mechanism
for service and data integration
Enhancement of service integration
Strong leadership from
the centralized IT and EA governance
IT redundancy management
and interoperability enhancement
IT investment management
based on the government-wide EA
Institutional foundation for utilization Mandatory adoption of agency EA,
but granting autonomy of EA artifacts
Enhancement of
government IT performance
& IT resource optimization
2 GEA Vision & Strategy
It optimizes the whole-of-government IT resources and improves performance. To that end, six strategic directions are established
7
3
Gov
’t-wide-level
Agency-le
vel
Strategy IT plan EA information
National Initiative
National IT Strategic Plan
Agency EA Transition Plan
Agency IT Implementation plan
Agency IT projects & resources
Information of GEA grouped by
Administrative Service
Government-wide
EA Transition Plan
As-Is To-Be
Information of agency EA
Optimization
Informatization
Vision
Monitoring
Presidential pledge
National informatization vision/goal
Agency middle and long term informatization plan
Agency informatization plan for next year
Agency IT plan
Vertical alignment
It supports alignment national initiatives, national IT strategic plans, and agency-level IT projects/resources
8
Agencies Planning
Agency
Budgeting
Agency
Operating
Agency
Evaluating
Agency
4
Plan Budget Evaluate Project/
Operation
(Ministry of
Public Administration
and Security)
(Ministry of
Strategy and Finance)
(National Computing
& Information Agency) (Prime Minister’s Office)
Horizontal alignment(1/2)
National IT management life-cycle
9
It will support IT management full life-cycle which was managed by each agency
4 Horizontal alignment(2/2)
10
Stage
Program, Project, Content
Before
Plan Budget Project/ Operation
Evaluation
e-Ipses N-Tops D-brain GEA portal System
GEA portal System
e-Ipses N-Tops D-brain
Stage
Program, Project, Content
After
Plan Budget Project/ Operation
Evaluation
Major system
Major system
It integrates and manages agency-level IT resources throughout government-wide IT management life-cycle
Government-wide EA controls agency-level EAs It serves as a national governance tool for IT Planning, Budgeting, Operating, and Evaluating
5 Cross-sectorial collaboration mechanism
Since the early 2000, many countries have introduced EA at only agency level. Also, they didn’t have a detailed architecture of entire country
Korea established a mechanism in which central governments manage subsidiary/affiliated agencies
Government-wide Enterprise
Architecture (GEA)
e-Government Service IT Project
Information Technology
Organization &
Business Function
National Vision
& Strategy
Database
Performance & Budget
EA in National
Police Agency
EA in Local
Government
EA in Korea
Forrest Service
Subsidiary agency EA in Ministry of
Public
Administration
and Security
EA in Ministry of
Strategy
and Finance
EA in Police
Agency
EA in Ministry
of National
Defense
EA in Ministry of
Environment Affiliated agency
Subsidiary agency
Subsidiary agency
Affiliated agency
Subsidiary agency
Subsidiary agency
Affiliated agency
Subsidiary agency
Affiliated agency
Subsidiary agency
Subsidiary agency
Affiliated agency
Subsidiary agency
Subsidiary agency
Affiliated agency
11
1. Legislation of EA law
2. The 1st EA master plan
3. The 2nd EA master plan
4. Increase of EA utilizing agencies
5. Evolution of EA Maturity Model
Promoting GEA through strong institutional supports
2
▶ Article 11. Chief information officer (CIO) shall directs agency’s EA
▶ Article 12. EA related policies shall be discussed at CIO Council
▶ Article 15. EA should be utilized to achieve public informatization
▶ Article 43. EA should be reported annually to the National Assembly
▶ Article 4. Pursuit of e-government based on EA
▶ Article 45. Establishment of EA Master Plan & GEA
▶ Article 46. EA introduction obligation in public sector
▶ Article 47. Promotion of EA introduction · operation
▶ Article 68. Analysis & evaluation of EA achievement
▶ Article 71. Designation of EA specialized agency(NIA)
▶ Issued about ineffective information resource
management
▶ Integrated into Electronic Government Act in May 2010
Legal basis Progresses
Framework Act on National Informatization
Electronic Government Act
Research on information resources of public sector
(Office for Government Coordination, April 2002)
Enactment of laws on effective introduction of
information system & operation (May 2005)
Establishment of the 1st EA master plan
& Guidelines(June 2006)
Preparation·Implementation of comprehensive
countermeasures to prevent duplicate investment
(since March 2010)
Establishment of GEA(September 2009)
Establishment and implementation of
2nd EA master plan(May 2011)
According to the EA law, public agencies should adopt EA, and all public IT projects &
e-government should be carried out based on EA
13
Legislation of EA law
For GEA, the EA law was legislated in 2005 to resolve ineffective information resource management at national level
1
Introducing and disseminating EA in public sector
Realizing performance-based integrated management system for national information resources
Initiating EA-based
government-wide informatization Laying
a foundation for mutual
utilization of IT
resources
Establishing EA for major public
sectors
14
Reinforcing agency’s EA capability Promoting EA market
“ ”
The 1st EA master plan
The 1st EA master plan in 2006 focused on the implementation of EA in each agency
2
▶Institutionalizing EA-based
informatization
▶Supervising progresses of IT
projects
Utilizing information resources effectively and improving performance of national IT projects
▶Preventing duplicated IT
investment
▶Improving functions of GEA &
information quality
▶Connecting & integrating public
services
▶Connecting & integrating
master data
▶Establishing interoperable &
technical foundation
▶Enacting notification of
interoperability secure
Transition from EA introduction to EA utilization
15
Setting a foundation for
national IT projects
Connection & integration
of IT services
Improving interoperability
among information
systems
Enhancing efficiency of
IT projects
Expanding foundation for EA promotion
Restructuring the governance and
direction
Disseminating EA guidelines
Enhancing maturity assessment
Expanding training programs
The 2nd EA master plan 3
The 2nd EA master plan in 2011 focused on enhancing government-wide informatization performance as well as agencies’
Number of agency implemented EA Growth of EA Implementation
Number of Agency
Targets
2008 2009 2010 2012
150
100
50
0
2011
79 83
100 110 110
Central
gov’t
Local
gov’t
Public
Agency
20 60 100 140 120 80 40 0
55
115
17
16
39
44
Implementation
16
4 Increase of EA utilizing agencies
According to the EA law, a number of agencies adopted EA are increased
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006
V 3.1 V 3.0 V 2.3 V 2.2 V 2.1 V 2.0 V 1.0
2006 2007 2008 2010
4
3
0
2009 2012 2011
2
1
2.6
2.3 2.5
3.2 3.0
3.3 3.2
Central gov’t EA maturity average result EA Maturity Model (Level 1 – Level 5)
Mandatory
Management
Promoting infrastructure
Changing management
Performance management
Use
Using in organization
Using in across agencies
IT Invest Management
Development
GEA required Information
GEA required relationship Info
Agency dependent EA Information
Align with national EA
strategy
Agency IT evaluation
Input to GEA
planning
Input to agency EA planning
EA Maturity Model : A standard model to evaluate the capability of EA utilization has been
evolving every year since 2006
17
level
5 Evolution of EA Maturity Model
According to the EA law, each agency should be evaluated for EA maturity level and the results are used for major criteria in the annual evaluation
18
1. GEA objectives
2. HR capacity improvement programs
3. Dissemination of best practices
4. Cooperation with various EA councils
5. EA Awards
Efforts to nurture architects & disseminate success cases
In order to implement national informatization in an effective manner,
design a blueprint for national informatization,
pursue optimal informatization based on the blueprint,
and provide concrete implementation measures
Alignment
Nations IT strategic plan is
aligned with agency-level IT
projects/resources
Integration
Information resources are
integrated to provide high
quality services to citizens
Transformation
GEA provides a roadmap
for government-wide public
business innovation
19
1 GEA objectives
The Korean government sets three objectives for GEA : Integration, Alignment, and Transformation
Institution type Trainees by year
Total ~2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Central government 1,280 277 186 42 152 193 130 300
Local government 2,168 80 48 48 253 558 276 905
Public agencies 2,098 128 224 137 120 271 360 858
Total 5,546 485 458 227 525 1,022 766 2,063
On-line EA training curriculum
Training Programs: for CIOs, basic course(include on-line course), practice course, etc.
20
Class Curriculum Training time(min)
1 EA concept 70
2 EA Using 60
3 Government EA configuration and status 70
4 EA case study 40
5 EA implementation procedures and adoption method 60
6 EA advancement and development plan 60
7 EA operation & management 50
8 Government EA portal demonstration & using method 70
2 HR capacity improvement programs
The Korean government offers the various kind of architect training programs
Ministry of Information and Communication case
Ministry of Government Administration and Home
Affairs case
Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries case
Public Procurement Service case
Seoul Metropolitan case
Korea Education and Research Information Service
case
Korea Land Corporation case
Korea Housing Corporation case
Industrial Bank of Korea case
BC Card case
2006 EA best practices
Postal Service Headquarters case
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs case
Department of Defense case
Ministry of Environment case
Public Procurement Service case
Korea Expressway Corporation case
Korea Water Resources Corporation case
National Federation of Fisheries Cooperatives case
2007~8 EA best practices
Kyobo Securities case
Shin Young Securities case
S company case
SK marketing & company case
Pulmuone Holdings case
L company case
Hanjin Shipping case
K company case
2010 EA best practices in private sectors
21
3 Dissemination of best practices(1/3)
The Korean government has been spreading excellent cases of GEA/EA implementation since 2006
United Kingdom case
Germany case
Netherlands case
EU case
Australia case
Singapore case
Canada case
New Zealand case
2010 EA best practices of foreign public sectors
Korea Customs Service case
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs case
Rural Development Administration case
Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service case
Korea Water Resources Corporation Case
Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Services case
Busan Metropolitan City case
2011 EA best practices
Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs
case
Korean Intellectual Property Office case
Korea Forest Service case
Seoul Metropolitan City case
Daejeon Metropolitan City case
Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service
case
Defense Agency for Technology and Quality case
2012 EA best practices
22
3 Dissemination of best practices(2/3)
The Korean government has introduced as many as 50 best practices of the public and private sectors
23
GEA/EA case presentations
Title ASIA-PACIFIC REGIONAL FORUM
ON ICT APPLICATIONS
Date 18th - 21st May 2011
United Nations Conference Centre (UNCC),
Bangkok, Thailand
&
Location
Korea e-Gov’t : Government EA(Enterprise
Architecture) & e-Gov’t standard Framework Present title
Title ENTERPRISE ARHICTECTURE
SUMMIT 2007
Date 15th – 19th October 2007
Grand Hyatt, Singapore Location
Deploying EA. A Korean Government
Perspective Present title
Organized by Organized by Flipside
3
The Korean government has been invited to present the excellent practices of GEA/EA to the world wide
Dissemination of best practices(3/3)
Title Public agency CIO council
Date March 22, 2007
47 Public agency CIOs
EA concept, necessity, and law
Attendance
Subject
EA Practitioners Council collects theirs’ opinions by holding annual meetings, and CIO
councils deliberate major issues
EA Practitioners council attendance
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
50 175 160 175 284 291
Title EA Practitioners council
Date April 2 ~ 3, 2012.
291 EA Representatives of the each
agency
2012 EA policy direction and plan,
GEAP utilization demonstration
Attendance
Subject
Title Central government CIO council
Date June 5, 2012
35 Central government CIOs
EA future direction and development
Attendance
Subject
24
4 Cooperation with various EA councils
The Korean government collects various opinions which apply them to the GEA policies
25
Award type 2010 2011 2012
Minister’s award 2 3 3
NIA chairman’s award 6 6
Institute of EA award 6
Total 2 9 15
25
5 EA Awards
The Korean Government has been awarding agencies and EA practitioners for their excellent GEA performance
26
1. Integrating into whole-of-government service
2. Saving budget in government-level
3. Reducing costs in agency-level
Saving budget & Reducing Costs
Visiting individual agencies involved/ Receiving guidance
• Confirmation of
attachment
• Visiting to related
agency
• Confirmation of
payment amount
1
2 3
Civil
petitioner attachment release
(registration officer) 4
National Police Agency
City hall
provincial
government building
City public office
Payment Entrusting vehicle attachment release
1
Before
2 3 4
After Civil
petitioner 1
Batch system for
vehicle attachment release Attachment release Payment 2 3
1 2 3
Amount that has to be
paid
Entrusting vehicle
attachment release
(responsible agency)
Attachment release (responsible office)
•Individual payment
• Requiring vehicle
attachment release
(civil complaint)
Attachment release Payment
(bank, making a deposit without a bankbook, electronic payment)
Confirmation of attachment
• Whole information related
with attachment
• Amount of payment
27
1 Integrating into whole-of-government service
It has a government-wide goal to integrate related agency-level systems into the whole-of-government services
Vehicle attachment release
1
Agencies can use and share integrated missing child information data through GEA
A foundation for mutual utilization
It allows agencies to share information together by creating interoperability structure to enhance public services
28
Integrated search service
National Police Agency, National Center for Missing & exploited
Children
Searching information
about missing children
Information about
institutionalized children
Information to prevent missing children
Family with missing child
Progress notification Personal information
such as pictures
Genomic information
Personal information of institutionalized children
(Specialized organization for locating missing children, Seoul Metropolitan. Korea Red Cross, etc..)
Fingerprints of Children (Local government)
Private organization information
TV Program information (Korea Broadcast Service)
Facility for protection
Info. about child
Missing child prevention
Info. about child
Report info. about child
Personal information
Detailed info. such as pictures
Detailed info. such as pictures
Genomic info.
Personal information
29
2009 2010 2011 2012
2,000
1,500
1,000
900
800
888 888 888 888
981 981 981
535 535
1,982
(Unit : 100 million KRW)
Agency A
System A
System B
System C or
Integration Connection
Agency B
System C
System D
System E
29
2 Saving budget in government-level
It helps budget saving by preventing duplicate projects or integrating similar systems in government-level
Every e-government project should be previewed according to the ‘Electronic Government Act’ to eliminate redundancy
The Korean government has saved 438.6 billion KRW ($482M) by preventing duplicated projects since 2009
Ministry of Land Transport and
Maritime Affairs
▶ Management of redundant IT
investment, saving $20M per year
▶ Integration of existing information
system (41 → 21)
Statistics Korea
▶ Prior review of IT investment,
saving $0.3M
▶ Reduce decision time of Information
resources management, saving
$0.04M
Korea meteorological administration
▶ IT management cost reduction,
reuses idle resources
▶ Saving $0.4M per year
Rural Development Administration
▶ Integration of existing webpages
(30 → 20)
▶ Integration of existing information
system, saving $0.7M per year
Korea Customs Service
▶ Management of redundant IT
investment,
saving $15M for 2 years (‘10~’11)
▶ Management of redundant
coordination and reorganization
Korean Electric Power Corporation
▶ Prior review of IT investment,
saving (saving $0.7M)
▶ Organization through information
system utilization analysis (saving:
$0.15M)
30
3 Reducing costs in agency-level
It also helps preventing duplicate projects or integrating similar systems in agency-level
1. New concept of EA: GEA
2. Transformation from EA to GEA
3. Real time government-wide information resource
management
4. Whole-of-government approach
5. Future Plan
Pioneers & a new world
5
Strategic objectives of GEA
Principles, Framework, Guidelines, Reference models, Meta model
Institutional Settings
Government-wide EA Agency – level EA
GEA artifacts Agency EA artifacts
GEA activities Agency EA activities
GEA management system(GEAP) Agency EA management system
Promotion and networking Education/training program Maturity assessment
Alignment
Guide
Interface
Alignment
32
1 New concept of EA: GEA
It opens a new era of government-wide optimization, departing from agency focused information resource management
Laws and Regulations
Framework
Meta model
Focused on implementation of agency-level EA
Enforced identical EA artifacts
Focus on utilization of EA
Allow customized EA artifacts
Limited to agency-level implementation EA
Limited to current and target architecture at agency-level
Expands not only to government-wide area but agency-level
Designs to share current and target architecture among agencies
Used as a standard only for agency-level EA artifacts (business, data, application and technical artifacts)
Becomes a standard for GEA artifacts (national strategies, IT plans, projects, IT resources, etc.)
The laws and regulations, framework, and meta model were modified to be
compatible to GEA
33
2 Transformation from EA to GEA(1/2)
It brought about dramatic changes of EA criteria such as laws, models, guidelines, etc. through its settlement process
EA maturity model
EA management
system
EA Governance
Evaluated the level of maturity focusing on agency-level
Evaluates establishment and utilization of agency-level EA, as well as institutional operation of GEA
Limited to agency-level EA management systems
Maintains agency-level EA management system
Establishes a new GEA management system
Managed the IT process of agencies Manages the IT process of both agencies and the whole-of-government
EA Maturity Model, EA management system, and EA governance were modified
to be compatible to GEA
34
2 Transformation from EA to GEA(2/2)
It brought about dramatic changes of EA criteria such as laws, models, guidelines, etc. through its settlement process
Clients Information system Agency Data
Civil
organization
Social
minorities
Patriots &
Veterans
North Korean
defectors
The disabled
Management system
of teenager from North Korea
North Korean teenager
support center
Integrated management system
for North Korean defectors
Korea Education Development
Institute
Ministry of
Unification
North Korean
studies
Information systems which are strongly related each other are identified and then subjected
to integrate
35
3 Real time government-wide information resource management(1/2)
GEAP makes it easy to identify all kinds of IT projects & resources of all agencies (1,400) on a real time basis
GEAP(www.geap.go.kr) shows all kind of information including Nation Initiatives, IT plans, IT
projects, HW, SW and etc. on a real time basis
36
Real time government-wide information resource management(2/2)
GEAP serves as an IT dashboard to provide detailed information about all public agencies’ IT resources at a glance
3
Evaluation
Prime Minister’s
Office
Planning
Ministry of Public
Administration
and Security
Budgeting
Ministry of Strategy
and Finance
Development & Operation
National Computing
& Information Agency
In case of Korea, four independent government departments as below are in charge of
each four major processes: planning, budgeting, development & operation, evaluation
Ministry of Environment
Ministry of Land, Transport and
Maritime Affairs
Ministry of Knowledge Economy
Local government
...... Public agency
Government-wide Enterprise Architecture
37
4 whole-of-government approach
It can be achieved only by whole-of-government approach along with participation of all IT processes owners
In particular, currently each nation has individual organizations for planning, budgeting,
development and operation, and evaluation for national information projects.
Front Office
Back Office
Ministry of Patriots and
Veterans Affairs
Communication Service Data
Example: Social welfare integrated Service platform
Worker Social
worker
The
disabled The elderly Woman Youth
General
people
The
vulnerable
Local Government Ministry of Health and Welfare Ministry of Public Administration
and Security
Ministry of Employment and
Labor
Korea Workers’ corporation &
Welfare service
Ministry of Strategy
and Finance
Ministry of Gender Equality
and Family
Korea Employment Agency for
the Disabled
Integrated information portal for
Public welfare service
Participation community
for beneficiaries and citizend
One – Stop
Social welfare civil service
Analysis support for
welfare policy and decision making
Connection & integration
for cooperation and process of
social and voucher welfare
Social welfare service
connection & integration
38
Future Plan
It is going to be an major pillar of e-government platform which will take Korean e-government to a upper level
E-government platform provides a variety of techniques(data, communication, service, etc.)
tailored to a new environment
5