Information Governance for Smarter Government Strategy and Solutions
Government and Governance
-
Upload
ryder-ward -
Category
Documents
-
view
28 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Government and Governance
Government and Governance
Where does your group fit on this values spectrum?
2
5 - Strong environmental values
On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being extremely supportive of jobs in the forest industry and 5 being extremely supportive of environmental conservation, how would you rate your simulation group's values?
4- Moderate environmental values
2 - moderate pro development values
3 - neutral1 - Strong pro development values
Today’s Agenda
Division of Powers Parliamentary Government
Institutions, Forms of LawProblems
Modifications
September 18, 2014 3
Institutional Design
September 18, 2014 4
• Who makes public policy?• Why does it matter?
Essential Elements of Authority
• Division of powers• Head of state• PM or premier• Cabinet• Members of legislature
• Legislatures• Minister• Appointed officials• Bureaucracies• Courts
Sustainable Forest Policy 5
Federal Division of Powers
• Provincial jurisdiction paramount– ownership of lands– including timber
• Federal jurisdiction– trade– spending (reforestation,
research)– Indians– fisheries– criminal law power
September 18, 2014 6
Federal Minister of Environment Leona Aglukkaq
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi1yhp-_x7A
September 18, 2014 7
Parliamentary Government – Institutions - Executive
• lieutenant governor (ceremonial)– Judith Guichon
• premier and cabinet– Premier: leader of the party with the most
seats in the legislature– Cabinet: selected by the Premier from
members of the legislature of the premier’s party
– Party rules and system norms make Premier/PM remarkably powerful
• Selects cabinets• Signs nomination papers
September 18, 2014 8
Parliamentary Government – Institutions - Legislature
• MP – Member of Parliament (federal)• MLA – members of legislative assembly (BC)• sits infrequently (36-47 days last 3 years)
– majority rule – government must have support of majority– party discipline – all members must vote how their party
tells them to• Party policy set by caucus – in reality by cabinet and especially leader
• Current – BC Liberal 49– NDP 34– Green 1
September 18, 2014 9
September 18, 2014 10
September 18, 2014 11
Parliamentary Government – Institutions - Judicial
• Provincial Court• BC Supreme Court• Provincial Court of
Appeals (or Federal)• Supreme Court of
Canada
September 18, 2014 12
Parliamentary Government – Forms of Law
statuteenabling legislation
Act of legislature
Wood first bill
regulationdelegated legislation
order in council
cabinet (informal)
lieutenant governor in council (formal)
contracts, permits
September 18, 2014 13
January 15, 2009 Sustainable Energy Policy 14
Diagram
Parliamentary Government -- Ideal
Representative, Responsible Governmentparties compete for votes (platforms)mandateopportunity to governaccountable at next election
September 18, 2014 15
Problems
• expertise and bureaucracy – politics-administration
dichotomy
• determining policy mandate• participatory values
– push for new forms of consultation
• minority-based majorities– push for different voting
rules
September 18, 2014 16
Minority-based Majorities in BC
1972 – NDP won a majority with 39.6% vote
1975 – Socreds won with 49.31979 – Socreds won with 48.21983 – Socreds won with 49.81986 – Socreds won with 49.31991 – NDP won with 41.7
• 1996 – NDP won with 39.5 (Liberals had 41.8)
• 2001 – Liberals won with 58%• 2005 – Liberals won 46% (46 seats)
– NDP 42% (33 seats)– Green Party 9% (0 seats)
• 2009 – Liberals won 46% (49 seats)– NDP 42% (31 seats)– Green 8% (0 seats)
• 2013 – Liberals won 44% (49 seats)– NDP 40% (34 seats)– Green 8% (1 seat)
17
Voting rules
• Single member districts, “first past the post”– Plurality (most votes
even if not majority) wins
• Current rule in BC
• Alternative: Proportional representation of some form
September 18, 2014 18
Modifications – See Chapter 1 in Luckert et al
• Multi-stakeholderism (October 16)• Legalism (next slide)• Increasing role for First Nations (next week)• Certification (October 7)• Community forestry• Initiative, referendum, recall (not discussed)• Electoral reform (failed)
19
Legalism• Policy-making strongly influence by courts.
Require: – public groups with access to courts – non-discretionary governmental duties – activist judiciary
• Effects – empowers interest groups– empowers unexpert, unelected judges
20
Enabling vs. action-forcing legal standards
Discretionary (enabling)
• BC Wildlife Act 6(1) Where the Minister considers that a species of wildlife is threatened with imminent extinction, the Governor in Council may by regulation designate the species as an endangered species.
Non-discretionary (action-forcing)
• US NFMA Regs: fish and wildlife habitat shall be managed to maintain viable populations of existing native and desired non-native vertebrate species in the planning area
21
Legalism limited in Canada because of discretionary statutes
– exception: First Nations
Bureaucracy
• Minister – elected MLA appointed by Premier
• Deputy Minister – unelected senior bureaucrat
• Assistant Deputy Minister
September 18, 2014 22
Steve Thomson, Minister of Forest, Lands, and Natural Resource OperationsMLA Kelowna-Mission
September 18, 2014 23
Governance – Broad Themes
• provincial dominance
• executive dominance
• legitimacy problems
• minor modifications
• policy style: executive-centered bargaining– norm of consultation
September 18, 2014 24
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bcgovphotos/6163866483/sizes/l/in/photostream/
Official Themes so far1. Policies are produced through
governance processes, influenced by environment and markets.
2. Governance addresses who decides, who participates, at what level of government, and with which instruments
3. Canadian forest policy is dominated by the provincial level of government
4. BC’s government is dominated by the executive, particularly the premier
5. Courts have played a limited role in forest policy, with the exception of Aboriginal issues, because of the discretionary nature of BC statutes
September 18, 2014 25
Values spectrum
26
5 - Strong environmental values
On a scale from 1 to 5, with 1 being extremely supportive of jobs in the forest industry and 5 being extremely supportive of environmental conservation, how would you rate your simulation group's values?
4- Moderate environmental values
2 - moderate pro development values
3 - neutral1 - Strong pro development values
Institutional Design
• Core issue: allocation of decision making authority
• Organizations have biases– balance of preferences can change as location of
authority changes
September 18, 2014 27
Institutional design - horizontal
28
5 - Strong environmental values
4- Moderate environmental values
2 - moderate pro development values
3 - neutral1 - Strong pro development values
MFLNRO MoE
Institutional Design - vertical
29
5 - Strong environmental values
4- Moderate environmental values
2 - moderate pro development values
3 - neutral1 - Strong pro development values
Global Markets
CanadaBCForest Dependent Communities
Government Actors -Objectives, Resources: Politicians• resource: authority• Objectives: reelection,
policy objectives, power– reelection comes first --
fundamental constraint– effect: public opinion
matters
September 18, 2014 30
• resources– authority– expertise
• objectives– policy objectives– power (budgets, jurisdiction)– autonomy
• effect: powerful organizational inertia
September 18, 2014 31
Government Actors -Objectives, Resources: Bureaucrats
Themes so far1. Policies are produced through
governance processes, influenced by environment and markets.
2. Governance addresses who decides, who participates, at what level of government, and with which instruments
3. Canadian forest policy is dominated by the provincial level of government
4. BC’s government is dominated by the executive, particularly the premier
5. Courts have played a limited role in forest policy, with the exception of Aboriginal issues, because of the discretionary nature of BC statutes
6. Institutional design matters because the balance of preferences may change as the location of authority changes
7. Politicians are primarily driven by electoral incentives, making public opinion a significant constraint on government action
September 18, 2014 32