Govern Publish Quality
-
Upload
impunitywatch -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Govern Publish Quality
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
1/24
Cultural and Legal Influences and Impediments
to Cultivating Peace and Human Rights in Islamic States
By Kevin Hugh Govern*
ABSTRACT
There are a multitude of cultural and legal influences that assistand impediments that
resistthe cultivation of peace and human rights in Islamic states. First, there is no one single
Islamic attitude towards the legitimacy of international law and international agreements
among the nations which have adopted Islam as their official state religion, those which have
adopted Islamic law (Sharia)1
as their legal system, or those that have Muslims as the majority
or sizeable minority of their populations. Second, the United Nation's Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (UDHR) is perceived by some in Islamic nations as failing to take into account
the cultural and religious context of non-Western, Islamic nations. Finally, there is a
fundamental requirement to categorize certain apparent or perceived differences in approaches to
advancing peace and human rights with respect to Islam. Certain practices and policies may be
in Sharia; others bycontrast may be erroneously attributed to be in Sharia but are in fact of
tribal or ethnic origin and are culturally significant but not Islamic. Some practices and policies
Kevin H. Govern, J.D., LL.M., is an Associate Professor of Law at the Ave Maria School of Law
and an Instructor of Legal Studies at the California University of Pennsylvania. He has also served
as an Assistant Professor of Law at the United States Military Academy. Any errors or omissionsare solely the responsibility of the author.
1Sharia is sometimes Anglicized into Shariah in English translations. See, e.g., Const. of Saudi
Arabia, art. 8, available athttp://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/sa00000_.html (Adopted in March 1992
by Royal decree of King Fahd);seeCountries, ISLAMIC WORLDNET, http://www.islamic-world.net/countries/index.htm (for a list of nations described as Muslim, Islamic, or Islamically-
influenced).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
2/24
2
are Islamic and incapable of change or variation, while other practices or policies may be
theoretical or aspirational but not enforced or enforceable.
This article will examine the cultural and legal influences and impediments to the
cultivation of peace and human rights in Islamic states. Part one considers the current context of
war and peace in Islamic states, recounting the turbulence in large part inherent within most
states and regions influenced by Islam. To understand why these conditions exist, and how they
might change for the better or worse, part two examines how words and deeds matter under both
Islamic law and as binding obligations under International law. Consistent with that study of
words and deeds, in part three there are contemporary obligations and eternal covenants that rate
commentary and show how regional and international alliances and treaties under Islamic law
affect peace and human rights. Part four adds an additional layer of historical perspective of past
being prologue regarding tribal influences, non-legal traditions, as well as laws and treaties
which may affect the advancement of peace and human rights. Finally, in part five, the so-called
Twitter Revolutions of 2010-2011 posits how social media and electronic dissemination of
knowledge have been indispensable to the (re)establishment of peace, human rights, and political
legitimacy in an ever-growing number of Islamic states. It is my hope that this five-part survey
will aid readers to more deeply appreciate the matters discussed on the promotion of peace and
waging of war, and the means of preserving and promoting the integrity and dignity of all human
beings, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
3/24
3
I. THE CURRENT CONTEXT OF WAR AND PEACE IN ISLAMIC STATES
The so-called Global War on Terror(ism), or GWOT, now restyled as Overseas
Contingency Operations, or OCOs,2
predominantly focuses on the clash between Western
democracy and the al-Qaeda terrorist network, while only secondarily striving to create or
foster conditions for peace, stability, or promotion of human rights. That is because the latter
effort is far more daunting and difficult.
A coalition of nations, including but not limited to the U.S., have been targeting well over
a dozen Islamic terror groups and engaging in cooperative ventures with many nations that have
Islamic law heritages or substantial Muslim majority or minority populations. Such coalitional
efforts still operate with inherent challenges of understanding the religion of Islam and the
cultural expressions and institutions that may be influenced by Islam but not controlled or even
prescribed by that faith. It is important to note that not all individual acts of terrorism can be
associated with fanatical political or religious ideologues, 3 nor should terrorism or even Islamic
extremism be imputed to the vast majority of those in the world who peaceably practice the
religion of Islam. As previously written in 2011,
[C]ountries in the Middle East and North Africa were experiencing protestsagainst political repression and economic hardship, unprecedented in scope or
duration since independence from imperial domination, and resulting in the rulersin Tunisia and Egypt being ousted, and those of Bahrain, Jordan, Libya, Oman . . .
Yemen and Iran [have been] challenged.4
2 See Scott Wilson, Al Kamen, Global War on Terror is Given New Name, WASHINGTON POST,
Mar. 25, 2009, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/24/AR2009032402818.html
3See JEFFREY F. ADDICOTT, TERRORISM LAW: MATERIALS, CASES, COMMENTS 9 (4th ed.,
Lawyers & Judges Publg Co., Inc. 2007).
4 Kevin H. Govern, 21st Century Africa as an Arc of (In)stability: U.S. and African Economic,Security, and Development Policies Advanced Through U.S. Africa Command Initiatives, 26
CONN. J. INTL L. 281, 286 (2011). Since the publication of that law review note, the leader ofLibya was killed by rebel forces, and the leader of Yemen has sought exile in Ethiopia. Ousted
Yemeni Leader Saleh to Seek Exile in Ethiopia, THE INDEPENDENT, Feb. 28, 2012,
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
4/24
4
Harkening back some fifteen years ago to a different time which nonetheless created the
circumstances of past being prologue, the American political scientist Samuel Huntington
warned of an upcoming international clash of civilizations.
5
Mindful of the aphorism that past
is prologue, I will next look back to look forward, order to comment on whether or not a right to
peace is mutually exclusive or inclusive of where human rights are to be recognized and realized
for all.
II. DIVINE WORDS AND HUMAN DEEDS - ISLAMIC LAW ANDBINDING OBLIGATIONS UNDERINTERNATIONAL LAW
Islamic law is ordinarily understood as the corpus of scholarly law handed down from
medieval times and crystallized in written form around the 13th
century (or later amongst Shia
scholars). It stems from the 7th century divine revelations of the Quran (alsoKoran in English,
but meaning the word of God) and the Sunnah (the record of the Prophets life). Islamic law is not
found in the Quran or Sunnah, literally, but rather through interpretation of those sources by
fallible human means.6
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ousted-yemeni-leader-saleh-to-seek-exile-
in-ethiopia-7447321.html. Since the publication of that law review note, the leader of Libya waskilled by rebel forces, and the leader of Yemen has sought exile in Ethiopia. See, e.g., Ousted
Yemeni leader Saleh to seekexile in Ethiopia, Independent.co.uk, Feb. 28, 2012,http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/ middle-east/ousted-yemeni-leader-saleh-to-seek-exile-
in-ethiopia-7447321.html.
5See SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON, THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE REMAKING OF WORLD
ORDER216-18 (Simon & Schuster 1996).
6Frank Vogel, Founder of Islamic Legal Studies Program at Harvard, Presentation to U.S. Army
Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command/Peacekeeping And Special OperationsInstitute (USACAPOC/PKSOI) at the 3d Rule of Law Workshop: The Islamic Legal Tradition
(Mar. 2007).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
5/24
5
International lawbased upon treaties between sovereign states and customary law
through legal norms of customary exchanges between stateshas been founded essentially in the
exercise of free will and conclusively in the elements of contract or covenant (offer, acceptance,
and consideration). In Islam, humankind has the freedom to make contracts and covenants with
others, and as a collective representation of Muslims, states may observe and conclude agreements
in accord with the law and custom of the land and treaty obligations.7
Islamic law allows for
Muslims to honor or break such obligations, consistent with this charge: O ye who believe! Fulfil
your compacts.8 In other words, there is exhortation to be true to your contracts, covenants and
commitments. For Muslims an oath may be expressed only in one specific manner, that is, in the
name of Allah alone. There shall be no compulsion in religion; for guidance and error have been
clearly distinguished.9
Note also that a number ofHadiths (traditions of sayings of the Prophet Muhammad)
suggest that swearing by anything but God is not allowed, especially with regards to contract and
covenant. For instance, in Bukhari:
[The Prophet] said, What do you think of men who impose shurut [stipulations]which are not in the Writ [Book] of God most high? Any stipulation not in the Writ
of God is void [batil]. Were it one hundred conditions, the judgment of God ismore just, and the stipulation of God more reliable.10
7See, e.g.,War View: UK Muslims Must Obey UK Law, BBC, Nov. 4, 2001,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1634517.stm.
8
Qur'an5:2 (New translation by Muhammad Zafrulla Khan (1997));see also Muhammad ibn al-Hasan Ash-Shaybani, MUSLIM INTERNATIONAL LAW (KITAB AL-SIYAR AL-SAGHIR),http://kalamullah.com/Books/Kitab%20al-Siyar%20as-Saghir.pdf.
9Quran 2:257 (New translation by Muhammad Zafrulla Khan (1997)).
10Frank E. Vogel,ISLAMICLAW ANDFINANCE: RELIGION, RISK ANDRETURN67 (1998) (internal
citations omitted).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
6/24
6
The consequences of infidelity to ones word, beyond the human consequences of conflict, strife,
or legal action, will be such that: [On the Day of Judgment,] every human being will be held in
pledge for whatever [evil] he has wrought save only those that have attained to righteousness.11
Despite these consequences, Muhammad renounced some agreements with infidels and
pagans, specifically one of his first international law obligations, when he broke the formal treaty
with the pagans at Mecca;
. . . Allah is free of all obligation to the idolaters, and so is his Messenger. So now,having witnessed this Sign, if you will repent and make peace, it will be better for
you; but if you turn away, then know that you cannot frustrate Allahs design.12
To this end, some might claim that Islam recognizes that oaths may be disregarded, but the Surah,
sometimes quoted towards that end, must be taken in the context in which it is offered: Allah has
sanctioned the dissolution of your vows, and He is your patron.13
Oaths are limited to the
intentions of the heart; to that end: Allah will not call you to account for such of your oaths as are
vain, but will call you to account for the evil you have deliberately assented to. Allah is most
forgiving, forbearing.14
In stark contrast to Muhammad, his followers were bound to their
obligations to the idolaters:
11Quran 74:38, in ISLAMITEXTS, http://www.islamitexts.org/?noar=&t=9&k=74%3A38 (last
visited April 19, 2012).
12
Quran 9:34 (New translation by Muhammad Zafrulla Khan (1997)) (Note that this must beread in conjunction with the exhortations which then follow: Carry out the obligations you haveassumed towards them till the end of their terms.).
13Id. at 66:2 (Note that this is related to pleasure of wives not other matters!).
14Id. at 2:225 (Note that this relates to vain oaths, made as an excuse from doing good and
working righteousness and promoting public welfare.).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
7/24
7
Allah is free of all obligation to the idolaters, and so is his Messenger. So now,having witnessed this Sign, if you will repent and make peace, it will be better for
you; but if you turn away, then know that you cannot frustrate Allahs design.15
Legal systems generally recognize the impossibility and impracticability of performance as
a defense to contractual obligations. This also pertains in Islam to oath keeping and absolution for
oath breaking. With respect to oaths among mankind, Muslims are told that:
Allah will not call you to account for your meaningless oaths but will call you toaccount for breaking your oaths by which you bind yourselves; the expiation of
such breach is the feeding of ten poor persons with such average food as you eatyourselves, or providing clothing for them, or procuring the freedom of one held in
bondage. . . . Do observe your oaths. Thus does Allah expound to you HisCommandments that you may be grateful.16
Pre-Islamic Arabian tribes concluded various alliances and treaties to regulate their
economic, social, and public life. Among these alliances were Hilf al-Mutayyibin and Hilf al
Fudul.17 The Islamic scholar Hilmi M. Zawati has noted that Islamic law imposes the requirement
to respect treaties among and between nations, even above the respect of religious solidarity,
quoting the Quran to this end:
Allah enjoins equity and benevolence and graciousness as between kindred, and
forbids evil designs, ill-behaviour and transgression. He admonishes you that youmay take heed. Fulfil the covenant of Allah when you have made one; and break
not your pledges after making them firm, having made Allah your surety; Allahknows that which you do.18
15Id. at 9:34 (Note that this must be read in conjunction with the exhortations which then follow:
Carry out the obligations you have assumed towards them till the end of their terms.).
16Id. at5:90.
17Hilmi M. Zawati,Is Jihad a Just War? War, Peace, and Human Rights Under Islamic and
Public International Law, 53 STUDIES IN RELIGION & SOCY 55 (2001).
18Quaran 16:91 (New translation by Muhammad Zafrulla Khan (1997)).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
8/24
8
Nevertheless, if they [who have believed and have not migrated] seek your help inthe matter of religion it is incumbent on you to help them except against a people
between whom and yourselves there is a pact. Allah sees what you do.19
It is both a sacred and human obligation, then, in which one must live the hadith that
requires Muslims to: Fulfill the trust towards the one who trusted you, and do not betray the one
who betrayed you.20
III. CONTEMPORARY OBLIGATIONS AND ETERNAL COVENANTS
HOW REGIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCES AND TREATIESUNDERISLAMIC LAW AFFECT PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
To fully understand Islamic attitudes towards an aspirational goal of peace and human
dignity, one must return to the essence of what constitutes Islam and what it means to be a Muslim.
Islam dates to the 7th Century Common Era (CE) (a/k/a Anno Domini or Year of Our Lord,
abbreviated A.D.) and the life of its founder, the Prophet Muhammad of Mecca, Arabia. The
Prophets life from 570CE through632CE included the beginning of his Prophethood in 610CE,
the spread of Islam with Muslim preachers reaching China by 615CE through 625CE, the
emigration of Muslims to Medina by 622CE, and the death of Muhammad in 632CE.21
In the formative era of Islam from the 6th through the 7th centuries CE, there arose a
problem of succession and leadership of the umma (community of the faithful).22 Under the four
19
Id. at 8:74.
20Zawati,supra note 17, at 55 n.272 (internal citations omitted).
21See MARKWELTON & KEVIN GOVERN, ILLUMINATING ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE: THE ORIGINS
AND PRACTICE OF ISLAMIC LAW WORLDWIDE 8-10 (2d ed. 2007).
22Id. at 12.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
9/24
9
rightly guided Caliphs: Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali and their successors came a rapid spread
of Islam.23
The origins of Shiite and Sunni Islam began as a political movement upon Muhammads
death where the preference of his son-in-law Ali, the fourth caliph, over Abu Bakr resulted in long-
term bitterness over the challenge of Umayyad caliphs.24 The struggles between Yazid and
Umayyads (Syria) versus Husayn and Shiites (Iraq) at Kerbala (680CE) led to persecution by
Sunni majority of those to be known as Shia and rejection/withdrawal of the political realm, and
the ensuing parallel but separate development of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) amongst Sunni and
Shia schools of thought.
25
The outset of this article noted the cultural and religious divide between Western, non-
Islamic nations and non-Western, Islamic nations on international obligation regarding human
rights. Nevertheless, amongst other agreements, the following were expressions of commitment to
peace and human rights between and among Islamic states: the Pact of the League of Arab States
and the Arab Charter of Human Rights; the Charter of the Organization of the Islamic Conference;
and the Sharia-compliant Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) charter. At the
risk of overlooking the entire range of current events impacting upon, and being impacted by, these
agreements, I shall discuss the most emergent matters with regards to regional stability and
security involving each.
23Id. (Note that throughout this article, certain anglicized terms will appear, to include variations
which may have American or Indian / British English spelling conventions applied. In this
instance, the anglicized Caliph, from the Arabic khalifat rasul Allah, means representative of theMessenger of Allah.).
24Id. at 8-10 (this struggle reached a head in the massacre of Kerbala in 680 CE of Alis son
Husayns forces. Supporters of Ali and sons Hasan and Husayn were forerunners of Shiism.Supporters of Abu Bakr and later of the Umayyad caliphs were the forerunners of Sunnism.).
25Id. at 8-10.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
10/24
10
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) with its fifty-seven members is the second
largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations.26
The OICs origins were
decades in the making after the official abolition of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, leading to the
1972 conference for the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Islamic countries held in Jeddah, Saudi
Arabia and the OIC charter adoption based upon the bedrock principle of Islamic solidarity.27
According to the Permanent Mission of the OIC to the United Nations, the OIC members pool
their resources together, combine their efforts and speak with one voice to safeguard the interests
and secure the progress and well-being of their peoples and of all Muslims in the world.28
Of similar aspirational nature and scope to the Arab Charter of Human Rights, the Charter
of the OIC has a preamble similarly inclined towards the commitment to religious values, human
rights, national sovereignty, as well as international obligations, in that it states that:
to respect, safeguard and defend the national sovereignty, independence andterritorial integrity of all Member States;
to contribute to international peace and security, understanding and dialogue
among civilizations, cultures and religions and promote and encourage friendlyrelations and good neighbourliness, mutual respect and cooperation;
to promote human rights and fundamental freedoms, good governance, rule of law,
democracy and accountability in Member States in accordance with theirconstitutional and legal systems;
to promote confidence and encourage friendly relations, mutual respect and
cooperation between Member States and other States;
26NGO Law Monitor: Organization of the Islamic Conference, THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR
NOT-FOR-PROFIT LAW (Mar. 23, 2012), http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/oic.html (theorganization changed its name (Arabic: : ; French Organisation de laConfrence Islamique) in June 2011 to its current name, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation).
27Id.
28CHARTER OF THE ORGANISATION OF THE ISLAMIC CONFERENCE (2008), http://www.oic-
oci.org/is11/english/Charter-en.pdf [hereinafter CHARTER].
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
11/24
11
to foster noble Islamic values concerning moderation, tolerance, respect fordiversity, preservation of Islamic symbols and common heritage and to defend the
universality of Islamic religion;
to advance the acquisition and popularization of knowledge in consonance with the
lofty ideals of Islam to achieve intellectual excellence;
to promote cooperation among Member States to achieve sustained socio-
economic development for effective integration in the global economy, inconformity with the principles of partnership and equality;
to preserve and promote all aspects related to environment for present and future
generations;
to respect the right of self-determination and non-interference in the domesticaffairs and to respect sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of each
Member State;
to support the struggle of the Palestinian people, who are presently under foreignoccupation, and to empower them to attain their inalienable rights, including the
right to self-determination, and to establish their sovereign state with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its capital, while safeguarding its historic and Islamic character, and the
holy places therein;
to safeguard and promote the rights of women and their participation in all spheresof life, in accordance with the laws and legislation of Member States;
to create conducive conditions for sound upbringing of Muslim children and youth,
and to inculcate in them Islamic values through education for strengthening theircultural, social, moral and ethical ideals;
to assist Muslim minorities and communities outside the Member States to preserve
their dignity, cultural and religious identity;
to uphold the objectives and principles of the present Charter, the Charter of theUnited Nations and international law as well as international humanitarian law
while strictly adhering to the principle of non-interference in matters which areessentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State;
to strive to achieve good governance at the international level and the
democratization of the international relations based on the principles of equalityand mutual respect among States and non-interference in matters which are within
their domestic jurisdiction;
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
12/24
12
Have resolved to cooperate in achieving these goals and agreed to the presentamended Charter. .
29
With respect to the intersection of law and religion, the OIC created the Sharia- compliant
Cairo Declaration of Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI).
30
Not intended to compliment, but rather
to supplant the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,31
the CDHRI states with respect to the
equal dignity of all humans, in peacetime and in wartime:
ARTICLE 1: (a) All human beings form one family whose members are united by
their subordination to Allah and descent from Adam. All men are equal in terms ofbasic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities, without any
discrimination on the basis of race, colour, language, belief, sex, religion, politicalaffiliation, social status or other considerations. The true religion is the guarantee
for enhancing such dignity along the path to human integrity.
32
29Id. The original Charter of the Organization of the Islamic Conference was concluded Sept. 25,
1969, available athttp://arabian-union.org/reference/oic_charter_text.htm. The 30 original
members include the: Kingdom of Afghanistan, the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria, theState of the United Arab Emirates, the State of Bahrain, the Republic of Chad, the Arab Republic
of Egypt, the Republic of Guinea, the Republic of Indonesia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, theHashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the State of Kuwait, the Republic of Lebanon, the Libyan Arab
Republic, Malaysia, the Republic of Mali, the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, the Kingdom ofMorocco, the Republic of Niger, the Sultanate of Oman, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the State
of Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Republic of Senegal, the Republic of Sierra Leone, theSomali Republic, the Democratic Republic of Sudan, the Syrian Arab Republic, the Republic of
Tunisia, the Republic of Turkey, and the Yemen Arab Republic. The membership has sinceexpanded to 57 with 5 observer states, and affiliation with 1 Muslim community, 2 Islamic
institutions, and affiliation with 5 international institutions at the time of this articles writing. See,e.g.,About OIC, Presentation, PERMANENT MISSION OF THE ORGANISATION OF THE ISLAMIC
CONFERENCE TO THE UNITEDNATIONS OFFICES IN GENEVA AND VIENNA (2009), http://www.oic-un.org/about_oic.asp.
30World Conference on Human Rights, Geneva, Switz., April 19 May 7, 1993, Cairo
Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, U.N. Doc.A/CONF.157/PC/62/Add.18 (June 9, 1993),
available athttp://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/cairodeclaration.html [hereinafterCairoDeclaration].
31The Organization Of The Islamic Conference And The Universal Declaration Of Human Rights,
UNITEDNATIONS UPDATE, at 53, available athttp://www.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief/16/1un
update.pdf?rd=1Universal Declaration of Human Rights [hereinafter UNITEDNATIONS UPDATE].
32Cairo Declaration,supra note 30.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
13/24
13
While these lofty, and largely admirable principles have been agreed to, the United
Nations Human Rights Council has encountered opposition to the CDHR, and the problems it
may present to universal human rights.33
A conference on "An analysis and Discussion of
Religion and Freedom of Expression at the Human Rights Council" was held at the UN Human
Rights Council on September 17, 2008,34 at which criticism was leveled at the OICs attempt to
validate the crimes that have led to trauma and dysfunctional societies across the Muslim
world.35
The criticism went on to claim that the OIC does not speak for Muslims.36
The
Human Rights Council noted that was the first time the OICs proposal has received such an
outspoken response, especially among Muslim groups, while acknowledging that the OIC, on
the other hand, maintains that the CDHR is a valid declaration of human rights and is still
supported by members of the OIC.37
Human Rights Watch has also leveled criticism at the OIC
regarding a lack of even-handedness in examination and correction of all abuses by state and non-
state actors, such that it has sought to shield member states from criticism, except when it comes to
criticism of Israel.38
33UNITEDNATIONS UPDATE,supra note 31, at 54.
34See, e.g., Tarek Fatah, Founder, Muslim Canadian Congress, Speech at the Intl Humanist and
Ethical Union parallel conference: An analysis and Discussion of Religion and Freedom ofExpression at the Human Rights Council, Sept. 18, 2008, available at
http://www.iheu.org/node/3277.
35
Id.
36Id.; UNITEDNATIONS UPDATE,supra note 31, at 54.
37UNITEDNATIONS UPDATE,supra note 31, at 54.
38Peggy Hicks,How to Put U.N. Rights Council Back on Track, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, Nov. 3,
2006, http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2006/11/03/how-put-un-rights-council-back-track.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
14/24
14
IV. TRIBES, TRADITIONS AND TREATIES LOOKING BACKWARD TO SEE FORWARD
REGARDING PEACE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Without delving deeply into the pre-nineteenth-century histories of most Muslim nations,39
what is crucial to a present-day understanding of Islamic attitudes towards international law and
international agreements stems from transformations which took place during the colonial and
post-colonial eras. In most emerging states, there was a rapid dismantling of the religious-based
legal systems in Muslim nations. In the so-calledDar al-Islam (literally, house/abode of Islam)
four sorts of states have emerged with politico-theological approaches to maintaining or
establishing Islamic law: 1) Semi-secular nations with a domain for the Sharia, but where most of
the laws are derived from the West (e.g., Turkey as the most dramatic case, but also Guyana,
Suriname, and others with sizeable majority or minority Muslim populations); 2) Traditionalist
states (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan); 3) Radical Islamizing states (e.g., Iran post-Khomeini,
Sudan), and; 4) Pluralist or Non-Denominational States (e.g., Lebanon, Turkey, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Nigeria and many other African States).40
39 The worlds Muslim nations include the following: Afghanistan; Albania, Algeria; Azerbaijan;
Bahrain; Bangladesh; Benin; Bosnia-Herzegovina; Brunei; Burkina-Faso; Cameroon; Chad;
Comoros; Djibouti; Egypt; Gambia; Guinea; Guinea-Bissau; Guyana; Indonesia; Iran; Iraq; Jordan;Kazakhstan; Kuwait; Kyrgyzstan; Lebanon; Liberia; Malaysia; Maldives; Mali; Mauritania;
Morocco; Mozambique; Niger; Nigeria; Oman; Pakistan; Palestine; Qatar; Saudi Arabia; Senegal;Sierra Leone; Somalia; Sudan; Suriname; Syria; Tajikistan; Tunisia; Turkey; Turkmenistan;
Uganda; United Arab Emirates; Uzbekistan; Western Sahara, and; Yemen. See Islam FAQ IslamAround the World, ABOUT.COM, http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/islam/
blfaq_islam_countries.htm (last visited Apr. 24, 2012);see, e.g., CIA WORLD FACTBOOK,https://www.cia.gov/library/ publications/the-world-factbook/index.html; but see, e.g,, Yogendra
K. Malik, & Dhirendra K. Vajpeyi,The Rise of Hindu Militancy: India's Secular Democracy atRisk, 29 ASIAN SURVEY 30825 (Mar. 1985), available athttp://www.jstor.org/openurl?volume=
29&date=1989&spage=308&issn=00044687&issue=3 (noting that the inclusion of Palestine andWestern Sahara for some may constitute some controversy as nations, and for that matter the
omission of the worlds largest democracy, India, which has the second-largest Muslim populationof any nation in the world but is a secular democracy).
40Vogel,supra note 6.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
15/24
15
Whether certain nations choose to abide by international laws or agreements is more often
than not a political determination with little influence on or from the development of Islamic
attitudes towards this legislation. Rather, Islamic attitudes towards international law and
agreements are more likely influenced by the legitimization of certain regimes and the power
structures that are recognized, reinforcedor at the very leastdiscussed. When conflicts arise
between and within secular and religious, or Muslim and non-Muslim factions, perhaps the best
approach with respect to dispute resolution would be this: sometimes you have to talk to people
who really offend you to find commonality and resolve essential differences.41
Nations with a domain for the Sharia have governments that recognize or even protect
freedom of religion for their Muslim citizens and their clerics, but this does not mean that Sharia
dominates or even necessarily controls affairs of state domestically and in the international arena.
In those nations, it is ere unlikely that the Shariaor clerical efforts towards its implementation
will have influence on concluding or abiding by international law and international agreements.
For radical Islamizing states, Islam is more than an ideology; it advocates or agitates for
states to rule solely by the Sharia, and attempts to suppress or outlaw or destroy Islamist
organizations may well lead to an escalation to violence.42
Such states have political spectra
ranging from gradualist to revolutionary adherence to rule under Sharia; the former is
characterized by an approach which may have existed for hundreds of years and the latter by one
which may have appeared virtually overnight!43
41Id.
42 Randal K. James, The Islamist Challenge in the Middle East and North Africa,AIRWARCOLL.
REPORT 18-19 (Apr. 1996), available athttp://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/james_rk.pdf
43Vogel,supra note 6.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
16/24
16
In Pluralist or Non-Denominational states like Turkey or Indonesia, Ulama and the
government currently coexist to greater or lesser extents such that the Ulama supports existing
rulers in their current and preexisting obligations to other nations under International law, yet these
rulers still exhort the states and their peoples to follow the Sharia without expecting too much in
implementation within their legal systems.44
Next considered is the notion of what constitutes international law or an international
agreement, and how Muslim nations interpret the same. Western and non-Western nations,
whether or not they have Muslim populations or Islamic legal influences, may have governments
that struggle mightilyand potentially failto construct or reconstruct functioning legal systems
and adhere effectively to international laws and agreements in the wake of revolution, civil war,
unrest, or occupation.45
To this end, we might look to what the majority of Muslim nations (or those with
substantial Muslim populations) have, at a minimum, signed, or, in many cases ratified or acceded
to, with respect to the content and applicability of international law.46
Thirty-one of the worlds
fifty-six Muslim nations (or those with substantial Muslim populations) have, at a minimum,
signed, but in many cases also ratified or acceded to, the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties (VCLT).47
This is crucial to appreciating Islamic attitudes towards international law and
44Id.
45See, e.g., Collaborative Governance, THE WORLD BANKINST.,
http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/.46
For sources of international law,see, e.g., Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90, available athttp://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm.
47 Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331, available athttp://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf. This agreement
entered into force on 27 January 1980.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
17/24
17
international agreements, inasmuch as Islamic signatory nations have publicly and openly
committed to the notion of binding international law via treaty and agreement.48
Part III,
Observance, Application and Interpretation of Treaties in the VCLT, is particularly significant with
respect to observing prior commitments, covenants and obligations. That segment restates at
Article 26 the Latin maxim Pacta sunt servanda: Every treaty in force is binding upon the
parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith.49
The challenges of anticipating whether those we come in contact with (or against whom
nations engaged to contact with force) will abide by international law and international agreements
must particularly arise when dealing with local, tribal, regional or non-state actors. These
individuals, not acting in concert with or on behalf of their governments, may care little or not at
all about their governments commitment to such international treaties and agreements, and their
immediate concerns may be far more pragmatic and less esoteric.50
For nation-to-nation contacts
at the strategic level and for politico-military purposes, it is important to consider a nations
policies toward international law and international agreements (at least at the tactical and
operational levels). This consideration should take into account past and present actions rather
than categories of particular groups and their adherence or non-adherence to international law and
international agreements.51
48See id.
49Id.
50 See, e.g., Major Ben Connable, Presentation at The Citadel: Culture and Insurgency, Mar. 15,
2007, available athttps://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=Presentation+at+The+Citadel%3A+Culture+and+Insurgency.
51Id. See also JOINT PUBLN (JP) 1-02, DEPT OF DEF. DICTIONARY OF MILITARY & ASSOC. TERMS(Nov. 8, 2010, as amended through Jan. 15, 2012), available at
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
18/24
18
So, whether a nation is failed, failing, at risk or even stable by any estimation,52
how might the U.S., or any other secular or non-Muslim nation, approach systems with Islamic
legal influences to foster stability and cooperation? The answer requires an understanding of the
history and culture of those nations influenced by the U.S.; using what has previously been
considered legitimate by these nations as a guide from which to work. Harvard Law School
Professor Frank Vogel has cited examples in Afghanistan and Iraq for post-intervention/occupation
legal systems where it is fundamental to understand what is of tribal origin and cultural
significance but not Islamic, what is Islamic and incapable of change, and what is, whats on the
books, as theoretical or aspirational aspects, but not enforced or enforceable.
53
Great benefits
come where negotiators find points of agreement to advance interests for security rather than, for
instance, focusing first and foremost on human rights agendas (e.g., inheritances of women under
the Sharia).54
52 See The Failed States Index 2011, FOREIGN POLY, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/failedstates
(last visited Mar. 8, 2012). The Fund for Peace is a research and educational organization that
works to prevent war and alleviate the conditions that cause war. Annual Failed States Indexassessments are based upon four social indicators, two economic indicators, and six political
indicators. Similarly the Ibrahim Index of African Governance measures, amongst other things,Safety and Rule of Law; Participation and Human Rights; Sustainable Economic Opportunity; and
Human Development as proxies for the quality of the processes and outcomes of governance.
See The Ibrahim Index, MOIBRAHIM FOUND., http://www.moibrahimfoundation.org/en/section/the-ibrahim-index (last visited Mar. 8, 2012).
53 Vogel,supra note 6.
54Id. With respect to inheritance, amongst other issues, see, e.g., Toni Johnson,Backgrounder:Islam: Governing Under Sharia, COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS (Nov. 10, 2010),
http://www.cfr.org/publication/8034/islam.html.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
19/24
19
Some time ago, Representative Thomas P. Tip ONeill said, all politics is local.55
So
too are the notions of Islamic attitudes towards international law and international agreements. To
return to one of the previously surveyed legal systems and nations, that of Afghanistan, there is
now a fundamental reconciliation of religion and culture in the Afghan constitutional framework
between Sharia, customary law of court-decided laws, and positive law of civil law.56 The return
to a democratization of laws in post-2001 Afghanistan has been furthered by the advancement of
stability and security throughout the nation, and by the recognition that all segments of society
must be actively involved in supporting local and national Afghan institutions.57 Individuals with a
background in non-Islamic value systems, hoping to promote the appreciation and support of
international law and international agreements in any nation with a Muslim population or legal or
political systems influenced or guided by Sharia, must become a student of Muslim and local
culture and Islamic law. The temptation to advance culturally-laden and uniquely nationalistic
values or beliefs must be avoided, and an attitude which finds common ground supportable under
both national and international law should be fostered.58
55See, e.g., ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL, available athttp://www.riverdeep.net/current/2000/10
/103000_politic.jhtml. It is commonly accepted that Rep. ONeill meant that local problems andconcerns shape the politics and policies implemented and advocated by Congress.
56See, e.g., Nadjma Yassari & Mohammad Hamid Saboory, Sharia and National Law in
Afghanistan, 6 Jura Gentium 1 (2010), http://www.juragentium.org/topics/islam/en/yassari.htm,
originally published in Jan Michiel Otto (ed.), SHARIA INCORPORATED: A COMPARATIVEOVERVIEW OF THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF TWELVE MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN PAST AND PRESENT 273-
318 (2010).
57Amiryar A. Quadir, Presentation to USACAPOC/PK301 at the 3d Rule of Law Workshop: The
Islamic Legal Tradition (Mar. 2007).
58Id.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
20/24
20
V. THE TWITTERREVOLUTIONS59
SOCIAL MEDIA AND (RE)ESTABLISHING PEACE,HUMAN RIGHTS, AND POLITICAL LEGITIMACY IN ISLAMIC STATES
One of my past commentaries chronicled how, since January 2011, U.S. allies and
adversaries alike in North Africa and the Middle East have experienced public unrest challenging
the illegitimacy of unelected and elected leaders alike and their role in making and enforcing the
laws that rule their nations.60
That commentary noted how, in the fall of 2010, the once-
preternaturally prescient Malcolm Gladwell cast doubt on the potential contribution of social
networking to social movements and social change.61
It further noted Gladwells conclusion in
his October 4, 2010 New Yorker article, Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be
Tweeted," that social networking websites with weak ties and unstructured equality were the
opposite of the U.S. civil rights movements strength to change powerful social forces through
strong ties among participants and hierarchical organizations.62
Days later, the newly-prescient Jeremy Brecher and Brendan Smith countered Gladwell
with the October 8, 2011 Huffington Post piece Is Social Networking Useless for Social
Change?63
Considering Malcolm Gladwell out of touch with true changes in political
59Kevin Govern, The Twitter Revolutions: Social Media in the Arab Spring, JURIST - Forum,
Oct. 22, 2011, http://jurist.org/forum/2011/10/kevin-govern-twitter-revolutions.php.
60Id.;see also Kevin Govern,Beyond Peer Pressure to Political Revolution Tunisias Jasmine
Revolution and the Use of Social Networking to (Re)establish Political Legitimacy, NAPLES DAILY
NEWS, Feb. 27, 2011, http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2011/feb/27/guest-commentary-beyond-peer-pressure-political-re.
61Govern, supra, note 59.
62Id. (citingMalcolm Gladwell, Small Change Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted, THE
NEW YORKER, Oct. 4, 2010,http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa_fact_gladwell).
63Id. (citingBrendan Smith & Jeremy Brecher,Is Social Networking Useless for Social Change?,
THE HUFFINGTON POST, Oct. 7, 2010, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-smith/social-
networking-is-malc_b_753274.html).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
21/24
21
organizing and communication, Brecher and Smith, with some significant understatement (and
slight misstatement),
cited to a once-influential study published in 1847 [that] observed that workers
were beginning to form combinations" via the use of electronic (telegraph) andprint (newspaper) means of communication. In a profound understatement, theauthors commented that [m]aybe the role of telegraph and newspapers a century
and two-thirds ago is irrelevant to the role of social networking media today. Butmaybe not.
The commentary goes on to note that in fact that study was the 1848 Manifesto of the
Communist Party by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, one of the most significantly observed
and violently opposed documents in human history!64
Marx and Engels observed that workers were beginning to form "combinations
and that this union [was] helped on by the improved means of communication thatare created by Modern Industry, and that place the workers of different localities in
contact with one another. It was just this contact that was needed to centralize thenumerous local struggles, all of the same character, into one national struggle
between classes.65
In writing about those connections between history and current events, I attempted to
raise some provocative questions; namely: are improved means of communications now
creating a contact . . . needed to centralize the numerous local struggles . . . into one national
struggle between governments and their people?66
Put another way, might modern-day
Internet revolutionaries in Islamic nations, and elsewhere, be either unconsciously or consciously
following those tenets set forth in the Manifesto?67
64Id. (citingKarl Marx & Friedrich Engels, MANIFESTO OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY, SELECTED
WORKS, VOL. ONE 98-137 (1969), available athttp://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/).
65Id.
66Govern, supra, note 59.
67Id.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
22/24
22
The commentary also points out the following irony:
What may prove in time to be one of Americas most infamous security breachesmay also be looked upon as the impetus for some recently emergent Internet-
based movements for freedom of speech and civil liberties. Specifically,
Wikileaks [Internet website] founder Julian Assange told reporters . . . leaked U.S.diplomatic cables in December 2010 showed former Tunisian president Ben Alito be corrupt and would not have U.S. support if revolution came to his nation.
68
As events unfolded, [t]hat news became known to thousands of technologically savvy young
Tunisians who were weary of the persistent political illegitimacy of the Ben Ali government,
and what mobilized them to act to bring the Ali government down.69
Months after those
commentaries, the world has watched recent history repeating itself in Egypt, with thirty-year
strongman Hosni Mubarak having stepped down, appearing supine (literally) from ill-health
before an Egyptian tribunal for a variety of crimes against his people.70
The 42-year dictator of
Libya, Muammar Gaddafi, was also captured and then killed after his convoy was attacked by
NATO planes, including aircraft from the US and France.71
Likely not the last to depart, ousted
Yemeni leader Saleh fled to Ethiopia in the Winter of 2012.72
Social networking-enabled challenges to authorities were ongoing at the time of this
articles writing in other Arab states, and also spurred on a resurgence of Persian resistance to
68The U.S. Embassy Cables:The Documents, GUARDIAN, Dec. 7, 2010,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/217138.
69Govern,supra note 59.
70Edmund Blair,Egypt's Mubarak Faces Next Trial Hearing on December 28,REUTERS, Oct. 30,
2011, http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/30/us-egypt-mubarak-idUSTRE79T0ZB20111030.
71Curtis Doebbler, The Rule of Law and the Extrajudicial Killing of Muammar Gaddafi, JURIST,
Oct. 24, 2011, http://jurist.org/forum/2011/10/curtis-doebbler-gaddafi-killing.php.
72Ousted Yemeni leader, supra note 4.
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
23/24
23
the theocratic regime in Iran.73
The commentary notes how [t]his paradigm of progress
challenges what I call antiquated agents of change, those nineteenth and twentieth century
notions ways in which peoples and nations might reestablish political legitimacy around the
globe.74
Nineteenth Century German political scientist . . . von Gneist considered the free
legal profession as an Archimedean lever for accomplishing the liberal project of personal
rights and the rule of law; that profession may still be significant, but interpersonal
communications have become an increasingly important lever to move ideas and regimes.75
All those who dream and talk of freedom (by all means direct and indirect) and are striving
to advance human rights and peace in North Africa, the Middle East, and throughout the Islamic
world and beyond, should (re-)read T.E. Lawrence to find that past is prologue:
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses oftheir minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day
are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make itpossible.
76
CONCLUSION
This article has been the briefest of analysis of historical, present-day, and future
challenges to defining and assessing both the cultural and legal influences and impediments
present to cultivating peace and human rights in Islamic states. These exist as a simultaneous
73Id.
74Id.
75
Govern, supra, note 59 (citingRudolf von Gneist, DERRECHTSTAAT484 (1872)).76 T. E. Lawrence, Suppressed Introductory Chapter, SEVEN PILLARS OF WISDOM23 (first
published 1939), available athttp://www.telawrence.net/telawrencenet/works/spw/sp_00_000.htm(In his 1926 subscribers' edition ofSeven Pillars of Wisdom, Lawrence placed dates in page
headings rather than the body of the text, and omitted this Introductory Chapter purportedly at therecommendation of George Bernard Shaw. Modern reprints of Seven Pillars of Wisdom include
this now-famous Chapter.).
-
8/2/2019 Govern Publish Quality
24/24
24
duality, rather than as an either/or proposition. My hopes are that the readership ofImpunity
Watch will use this concise collection, analysis, and commentary as they rethink past policies
and relations between and among peoples of the Muslim and non-Muslim world, and to plan for
and promote healthy cooperation and productive competition rather than conflict.
In closing this study, let me offer a quote from the present UN Secretary-General at his
Oath of Office Ceremony on advancing rule of law in every nation and culture, Islamic or
otherwise, within the potentialities and considering the limits upon the state: Development,
security and human rights must go hand in hand; and that there can be no security without
development and no development without security and neither can be sustained in the longer term
without being rooted in the rule of law and respect for human rights.77
77Joseph Legwalia, Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Africa, Secretary-General's
Remarks at General Assembly Tribute to Secretary-General and Oath of Office Ceremony ofSecretary-General Designate Ban ki-Moon, Dec. 14 2006,
http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=2365.