Nervous Politics

APUSGOPO

Rules• Get in one of three teams• Pick a person to be your speaker• Pick a person to be your guesser• None of the other team members

may speak but they may use their notes or textbooks and write down answers

Rules

• The speaker faces the overhead where the words are projected

• The guesser sits with their back to the overhead• The team has 30 seconds • Terms will be flashed on the overhead, one at a

time• The speaker tries to get the guesser to say as

many terms as possible within 30 seconds

Rules

• The speaker may say anything (within reason) except the actual words they are trying to get the guesser to say. They lose a point every time the speaker says the term.

• The team gets one point every time the guesser guesses the term

• If the speaker gives up they may say “pass” and go on to the next slide. They can not go back to slides they pass.

Rules

• At the end of the time, other teams may guess the unanswered terms for half credit (first hand up, first served)

• The team with the most total points at the end of the game gets that many extra credit points.

•Federal Reserve Board

•Office of Personnel and Management

•EPA

•Brown v Board

•Gideon v Wainwright

•Civil Service

•Federal Register

•FCC

•Miranda v Arizona

•Roe v Wade

•Bakke v University of California Board of Regents

•Spoils system

•Cloture

•Selective Incorporation

•Categorical grant

•Oversight

•FDA

•Tinker v DesMoines

•Engel v Vitale

• Inner Cabinet

•Social capital

•Miranda v Arizona

•Gender gap

•Political socialization

•PAC

•Texas v Johnson

• Independent expenditures

•Dealignment

•Duverger’s Law

•Poll Tax

• incumbent

•midterm election

•Term limits

•Plessy v Ferguson

•Double Jeopardy

•Civil Rights Act of 1964

•Commander in Chief

•Election of 1932

•Commerce Clause

•14th Amendment

•divided government

•Realigning Election

•Speaker of the House

•Gitlow v New York

•Executive Order

•Anti-Federalists

•Reynolds v US

•Clear and Present Danger Doctrine

•4th Amendment

• James Madison

• John Marshall

•Habeas Corpus

•Writ of Certiorari

•Federal Appeals Court

•Heart of Atlanta Motel v US

•Due Process

•Strict Constructionist

•Free Exercise Clause

•Americans with Disabilities Act

•Pocket Veto

•Rule of Four

•Filibuster

•Fiscal Policy

•Block Grant

•Presidential Chief of Staff

•DOMA

•Eminent Domain

•Gideon v Wainwright

•Dissenting Opinion

•Rider

•Solicitor General

•Conference Committee

•Articles of Confederation

•Federalism

•Checks and Balances

•Liberalism

•Liberalism

•Federalist Papers

•Separation of Powers

• No Smoothen the Lion

•Popular Sovereignty

•Medicare

•Socialism

•GDP

•Commerce Clause

•Multilateralism

• Bill of Rights

•Social Security

•Deficit

•Full Faith And Credit Clause