“Ask for OC opinion”

“Try to destroy email”

“quoted 102(b)

“Draw line at engineers doing more research”

___________________

Answers are:OC is Orange County, Google M&A boss:jack

Her notes to outsiders were: Vorbis-VP8, webM, Motorola semiconductor firm,,and dozens more seeing our trade secrets—to destroy paper trail.

See last slides: Dr.Tim Terriberry, was Vorbis coding. Had moved to Mozilla new position 2010. Tim Designed old VP-3,4,5,6,7,8: none worked. Unitl our codec & her notes explaining ‘how.’ to make VP8 work.

All notes have violators of our trade secret s: Google stealth recipients .

Mozilla would be sued as recipient company Tim works for, after leaving dozen years with XIPH/Vorbis.

Tim Terriberry—Vorbis, codes audio all vp4,5,-vp8 didn’t work 7/2010. see:treecoder”’ from our lawyer &patent page 1;Note: Google revises history here. Treecoder.h/ treecoder.c, etc are direct from our patent lawyer

“Recklessness Standard, planned Google if caught with patent theft.

-------------Engineers: we know

they are listed on amended oct 2010 On2 VP4 pending

pp, now granted with our inventions. Engrs are publically listed

on webM with Tim /Vorbis on 2010

Oct -2013 webM coding.

-----“If we are designing product” (they were:

VP8 for youtube, ‘free”competition to

H.264: webM, Songbird, Android,

music storage lockers 2011,google

TV, Music,tunes,

--”file our ownPatent.

It’s common for Gto allege SwearingBehind, 102b, bullyInventions with:ClaimsConstruction issue,Invoke Interference.

Google would get caught if VSL’s engineers or pro bono Dr.Oguz met the video compression, obsolete technology engineers from Google all of 2010.

None of these names are employees of Google April 2010-December 16, 2010, while Google sought documents, claim charts for H.264 infringement, Google hired Tim Terriberry, PhD, worked with On2 Technology from XIPH.org, open source group for audio. See webM –all grown from VSL UBER patents, codec & secrets.

1.Talk to their engineers find out about products. And find out about what’s going on.

Why not write that in On2 files? Or leave on a Google engineer or patent lawyer desk?

Why glue a post-it note to VSL’s trade secrets...Design around?.

Recklessness std is Google’s planned Defense for getting caught stealing., in case they were caught.

Planned early.

Discourge engrs-She doesn’t want them to get to know us, ALL the planned engrs meetings were stalled. We have emails from Jack: ‘we’re scrambling trying to find time to meet..

same guys owned On2 Technology, VP8 that was mocked : ‘diary of x264 developer’” may 19, 2010. VP8 is a turkey. Google “Diary”

File our own pat.They asked ourLawyers toCreate –what weDid not have:CLAIM CHARTSH.264 v VSL

Google filed 48 new applications for same inventions as VSL’s. All granted in 18 months by PTO.

Look up:

YAOWU XU, engineer Google,On2, patents. Compare to VSL uber patents: Lossless inventions.

102b SwearingBehind was herIdea of invalidatingUs, but she couldNot, we have noPrior art. Asks: ‘have we,(google)Filed patent onSomething like us?No is the answer.They haven’t. On2Didn’t have anythingLike our inventionsVSL’s slice, partition,Reduction of dataBy encoding andTransmittingLossless—impossibleBut true. VSL isData Transmission.

\“Try to DESTROY EMAIL” meant forIllegal recipients whoAre named by GoogleAs receiving, againstNDA, without VSLKnowledge, our ownSecrets.

Had weWanted outsiders toLearn our multi-billion dollar-secrets wewould have met withthem under privilegeof NDA.

“ask for OC ( Outside Counsel ) opinion”

“pool” is H.264 Standards. Wewere invited to join7/2004 when it was launched. H.264. And 2011 with our China pat. MPEG-LA had nopatent forSlice & partition inPool when launched using ours.

Google knewthat H.264 Infringed our Patents. Today: Google hasLicensed in a Settlement toMPEG-LA: our VSLInventions. Hiddenin a sealed agmtbetween Google &MPEG-LA: as“technique”.

Don’t know what GP- is, ratingReview or354 31773—Must research

But GP is name forMotorola semiconductorPlants mentionedOn another MarginNote: yellow post-it.

1789 is another

Defense. It was

Used in England in an infringementCase.

We don’t knowWho outsider“harvey MPEGGuy is”, butIt is treble damageswhen Google & Harvey are foundSharing VSL tradeSecrets.

AAC, MPEG4 –HEAAC V.1 MUSIC FOLKS

ANOTHER PERSON

WHO SHOULD NOTHAVE OUR TRADESECRETS! IF WEWANTED THEM TO,WE WOULD HAVEMET THEM WITHOUTGOOGLE.

DEPOSITION RECIPIENTSREGARDLESS IF LEGAL ORILLEGAL. INFORMATIONEXISTS REGARDINGINTENTION AND WHATWAS DISCUSSED, AND‘DESTROYED ‘PAPER TRAIL’

basis of new revenue stream: ads MUSIC” play video within player!’ that’s us.

SEE PLANSON OTHERNOTES.

Shiva isProject Manager

YouTubeVideos andAdvertising.

Adsense is the big money makerFor Google.

Our Data TransmissionIncreased Google’s Revenue stream

We’re a fast, and a better prediction.

Zurich is Google’s 2nd largest engineering office.

Music advertising:Related toAdSense: see next slide

AdSense for video allows publishers with video content to generate revenue using ad placements from Google's extensive videosYoutube, advertising network. This was Initiated in 2012

Without our codecAnd VP8 conversion integrating Vedanti, Adsense revenue from video couldn’t work

Stage 1: use Simplify Music tech within Android. Simplify acquired 2/2010.Met VSL: 3/2010, codec and trade secret due diligence April 2010 –Dec 2010: M&A

1)Need our codec which Google has, and built into half a dozen music business:2)2011-2014.

1)Stream, 2) transfer transmit in Ogg Vorbis: see Tim “carabarry note within Margin Notes. See last slide: ‘webM’ Vorbis audio coding: Tim is with Mozilla 2010.

2)Couldn’t transmit in Ogg Vorbis. Switched to VSL..

Google and On2 did not have a decoder.

VedantiSystemsHad built in F A S Tdecoder.

To prove it:Google: “diary of x264 developer. May 2010.

Illegal recipients of Vedanti Trade Secrets who helped Google rip off VSL . Look at VP8 effort…

)Do they infringe? (yes),Can they invalidate? (No –and didn’t). Business?

Design Around?

They did: bad:VP8, VP9, chipsets, new webM, youTube coding replaced H;264;GoogleTV, IPTV, Google studio, Android, ads withVideos embedded,3 int’l music entities Songbird, Google Play, Google Music Locker, Cloud, dozens of patent amendments: started 10/2010: added partition, slice, macroblock pixel

“Google’s Music Locker Now Works Like Apple’s and Amazon’s. Except It’s Free.

DECEMBER 18, 2012 AT 10:00 AM “ EXCERPT FROM “GOOGLE” 5/4/2014

• Remember back in 2011, when all the big tech companies were working hard to create music “locker” services that allowed you to store\your music in the cloud so you could listen to it whenever you wanted?

• Well, all of the big players — Apple, Amazon and Google — have them now. But it’s hard to tell if all the effort was worthwhile.

• Perhaps we all use them, and they’re so commonplace that no one thinks to mention it anymore. But my hunch is that they haven’t gotten much uptake from mainstream users. It may be telling, for instance, that none of the three competitors do much boasting about usage. Because all of them like to produce big numbers when they can.

• It’s possible, but not likely, that today’s news will change that: Google is rolling out a “scan and match” feature for its locker service,

• * which means it should be much, much faster to move songs from your computer to their servers — just like Apple and Amazon already offer.

• The twist is that Apple and Amazon charge users $25 a year for their service, and Google’s will remain free.

•

Music locker blog

BELOW IS EXCERPT MAY 4, 2014, FROM GOOGLE RESEARCH “MUSIC LOCKER “---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “SEPT. 15, 2010 - 1:00 PM ONLINE ANNOUNCEMENT

SUMMARY:A new digital music service from Google will likely include a la carte downloads, music sharing and a cloud-based “digital locker” where users can store their music for $25 a year,

According to a report by Billboard. Sources told the music-industry magazine that Google has been circulating a detailed proposal for just such a service to a number of record labels, hoping to get them to sign licensing deals that would allow the company to offer access to their music in the company’s proposal. “--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dates of Google NDA “purpose” signed April 2010to engage acquisition of Vedanti Systems : was March 2010 –December 16, 2010

‘INTENT: Google writes through August, negotiating with Vedanti and K & L Gates for: Claim charts for hg1 v H.264

Yet, Stage 1 June,Stage 2: music locker service

Music locker was active with Amazon / Apple.Google had no VP8 that could achieve it. Proof is here that VP8 was useless 2010.

Locker service uses Cloud. No VP8 was available for Cloud.

Will Google be able to disrupt the market with its new store? Right out of the gate…Excerpted May 4, 2014 from Google launch DEC. 6, 2010 - 6:59 AM PDT

‘GOOGLE Ebooks

•

…”Google today launched its long-awaited electronic book store, called simply Google eBooks, with more than 3 million titles and 4,000 publishers participating as partners. The move is likely to ramp up competition in the e-book market, which until now has been dominated by Amazon and Apple…”

• “Google will pay the publisher 52 percent of the list price if a title is sold through Google’s store, or 45 percent…”

• …”is available only in the U.S. for now, but is expected to roll out in Europe and other countries early next year (2011)…

• “We’re not peddling devices here –we want to focus on selling books,” Crawford said

• The Google e-book manager said the company is focused on what he called a “cloud-based model of consumption,” December 6, 2010 article.

DATA TRANSMISSION IS THE NAME OF VSL’S CATEGORY OF TECHNOLOGY

• VSL was called the holy grail invention by Akin Gump who wrote the patent. They said it was the answer to the narrow bandwidth of the Internet. VSL kept it quiet, hidden, especially the codec. The secret sauce. VSL was building a first in technology: a bundle of assets indemnified by the only family of UBER PATENTS in data transmission.

• Qualcomm got it in 2004 from VSL founders, and said in 2007: “it is the most important invention to walk into Qualcomm’s door. “ They are the world’s largest data transmission based chipset company today.

• VSL invented PARTITION of a frame: called Partitioning. The secret sauce for Google was the same for Qualcomm. It is what makes a company such as Google who uses it in all of its hundreds of renditions, a ferocious giant of the future: the Internet bandwidth is too narrow for video compression. It must use VSL’s solution of encoding, slice ,partition, lossless data solution.

• Max Sound Corp’s Greg Halpern wanted VSL to sue Google. He showed VSL that Max Sound’s joint venture with VSL is the way forward for a technology that launched the mobile wave. That is why VSL and MaxD are partners.