Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and...

35
Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service is an equal access/equal opportunity institution. “This activity was funded, by Purdue, as part of AgSEED Crossroads funding to support Indiana's Agriculture and Rural Development”.

Transcript of Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and...

Page 1: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments

Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service is an equal access/equal opportunity institution.

“This activity was funded, by Purdue, as part of AgSEED Crossroads funding to support Indiana's Agriculture and Rural Development”.

Page 2: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Site Selection •  Land use history:

– Possible contamination? •  Livestock or manure •  Flooding •  Hazardous chemicals

•  Is adjacent land being used for purposes that may result in contamination of land? – proximity to livestock operations, cull piles,

refuse dumps and debris

Page 3: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Site Selection

•  Soil can be tested for fecal bacteria, heavy metals or chemical contamination.

•  Fecal coliforms or E. coli are often used as indicators of contamination by manure or sewage.

Page 4: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Audit Checklist: Site history and soils

Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc

1-23 A previous land use risk assessment has been performed.

5 R

1-24 When previous land use history indicates a possibility of contamination, preventative measures have been taken to mitigate the known risks and soils have been tested for contaminants and the land use is commensurate with test results.

10

R

1-25 Crop production areas that have been subjected to flooding are tested for potential microbial hazards.

5

R

Page 5: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

All Manure Can Carry Pathogens •  Livestock

•  cattle, swine, poultry, horse, & sheep

•  Dog and Cat •  Bird •  Rodent •  Deer •  Fly or other insect •  Human Common pathogens in manure

–  E. coli O157:H7 –  Salmonella

Cornell GAPS

Page 6: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

What’s in your watershed? Where’s the livestock? Wildlife?

Runoff into irrigation pond? Where’s the well?

http://www.mo.nrcs.usda.gov/news/MOphotogallery/Ponds%20Dams%20Lakes/PL566-6.jpg

Irrigation Pond

Prevent livestock, manure and contaminated runoff from coming in contact with produce or irrigation water

Page 7: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Wild Animals

•  Watch for evidence of wild animals –  Keep them out of fields

•  Control: –  Fencing –  Scare tactics –  Depredation –  Modification of the

surrounding environment

Photo of deer: Adele Hodde, Illinois Department of Natural Resources; others e. Maynard.

Cornell University

Page 8: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Pets •  Keep pets out of field during growing season,

using barriers as necessary. •  Animals can bring not only their waste but

can carry pathogens from the waste of other animals.

http://www.kingcounty.gov/recreation/parks/inventory/marymoor/offleash.aspx

Page 9: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Draft Animals •  Designate and use roadways

in fields when possible •  Seed roadways with grass •  Pay attention to sanitation •  Immediately remove any

contamination and develop harvest protocol

http://www.kingcounty.gov/recreation/parks/inventory/marymoor/offleash.aspx

Page 10: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Preventive Controls if You Find Feces in the Field?

•  Immediately remove any feces and dispose of away from field

•  Do not harvest produce nearby that may be contaminated –  Suggested buffer zones range from 5-25 foot radius,

depending on crop, climate ,and contamination

•  Clearly mark area that should not be harvested

•  If there is a repeated presence, take action

Page 11: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc

1-12 Crop production areas are monitored for the presence or signs of wild or domestic animals entering the land. 5 R

1-13 Measures are taken to reduce the opportunity for wild and/or domestic animals from entering the crop production areas. 5 R

Record and Audit Checklist Animals/Wildlife/Livestock

Page 12: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Using Manure as a soil amendment

•  Valuable source of nutrients •  Potential source of pathogens •  Take measures to reduce risk when using

Page 13: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Indiana Manure Storage •  Storage in an approved manure storage

structure •  If application more than 72 hours – 90 days

•  must be covered or otherwise protected to prevent run-off or infiltration to ground water

– Not within 300 feet •  water wells •  surface waters •  drainage inlets

•  Away from fields Cornell GAPS

Page 14: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Decreasing Pathogens from Manure

•  Manure of young livestock tend to be higher in pathogens

•  Type of animal matters –  Horse manure typically much lower in E. coli O157:H7

•  Incorporate manure into soil –  reduces physical transmission risk (splash) –  increases competition and predation from soil microbes –  Seasonal Patterns

•  Most prolific under warm humid conditions. •  Maximize the time between application and harvest •  Compost manure

Page 15: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Applying Raw Manure •  Avoid contaminating:

–  irrigation water – other crops –  finished compost or other materials

•  What crop is in the next field? –  Don’t apply manure or manure-containing litter

while edible part of crop is present.

http://www.al.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/photo/anim/mngt/spreader.jpg

http://nj.gov/agriculture/annual00/plant.htm

Page 16: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Preventive Controls when Applying Raw Manure

•  Apply in the fall to a cover crop before ground freezes

•  Apply in the spring to an agronomic crop (or other crop not for direct human consumption) the season before vegetables •  Incorporate 2 weeks before planting

•  Organic Standards: Apply and incorporate manure at least 90-120 days before harvest of crop for human consumption

http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2008/080903.htm

Cornell GAPS

Page 17: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Applying Raw Manure • Proposed FSMA Rule:

–  deferring decision, to do more risk assessment and research (9/14) – www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm425766.htm

•  ECGA • No manure for at least two years prior to production

Page 18: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Summary: Manure Application

•  Do not assume any manure is ‘clean’. •  Incorporate, Incorporate, Incorporate •  Absolutely NO SIDEDRESSING produce with fresh

manure. •  Know manure source and how it was handled

Cornell GAPS

Page 19: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Option A: Raw Manure Points YES NO N/A Doc

1-14 When raw manure is applied, it is incorporated at least 2 weeks prior to planting and a minimum of 120 days prior to harvest.

10 R

1-15 Raw manure is not used on commodities that are harvested within 120 days of planting. 10 R

1-16 If both raw and treated manure are used, the treated manure is properly treated, composted or exposed to reduce the expected levels of pathogens.

10 R

Audit Checklist Manure

This is from the USDA GAPs Audit Checklist. �Other audits may have different rules! �

Page 20: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Ro#ng  pile  vs.  compost    

So  what  makes  manure  .  .  .  compost?          

Page 21: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Is  it  Compost?  

•  Unless  the  compost  has  been  produced  under  very  strictly  regulated  circumstances    

•  Then,  it  is  manure  and  should  be  treated  as  such.  

Where’s this bucket been?

Page 22: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Compost: defined in the Organic Rule “The  product  of  a  managed  process  through  which  microorganisms  break  down  plant  and  animal  materials  into  more  available  forms  suitable  for  applicaCon  to  the  soil.    • Compost  produced  through  a  process  that  combines  plant  and  animal  materials    

–  with  an  iniCal  C:N  raCo  of  between  25:1  and  40:1  • Producers  using  an  in-­‐vessel  or  staCc  aerated  pile  system    

–  must  maintain  the  composCng  materials  at  a  temperature  between  131⁰F  and  170⁰F  for  3  days.  

• Producers  using  a  windrow  system    –  must  maintain  the  composCng  materials  at  a  temperature  between  131⁰  F  and  170⁰  F  for  15  days,  during  which  Cme,  

–   the  materials  must  be  turned  a  minimum  of  five  Cmes”  

Page 23: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

The  old  adage….  If  you  didn’t  write  it  down  .  .  .  

it  never  happened.    •  So  if  you  want  to  use  composted  manure  as  compost  instead  of  manure    –  record  all  composCng  process  steps  

•  If  you  obtain  compost  from  someone  else    –  request  documentaCon  of  ingredients  and  process.  

Page 24: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

TesCng  •  TesCng  is  available  through  commercial  labs  and  is  recommended  in  situaCons  where  there  is  any  doubt  about  the  purity  of  manures.    

•  Manure  web.extension.illinois.edu/clmt/Workbook/APPENDIX/APP_F.DOC  

•  Compost  www.composCngcouncil.org/programs/sta/  

Page 25: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Finished Compost Field Application based on Nutrient Application

•  Application of finished compost to your fields – No setbacks. – No permit for application.

Page 26: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Preventive Controls Using Composted Manure

•  Know the source of the compost •  Once compost is finished

–  protect it from contamination.

•  Proposed FSMA rule: no restriction in use (9/14) –  compost would have to meet the microbial standard –  applied in a manner that minimizes the potential for

contact with produce both during and after application.

Page 27: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Keep Records of Manure and Compost Use

•  Know the source of manure or compost. –  Methods used to produce compost –  Type of manure, animal age, storage time.

•  Keep records of: –  application rates –  Timing –  fields receiving materials

Page 28: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Option B: Composted Manure Points YES NO N/A Doc

1-18 Only composted manure and/or treated biosolids are used as a soil amendment. 10 R

1-19 Composted manure and/or treated biosolids are properly treated, composted, or exposed to environmental conditions that would lower the expected level of pathogens.

10 D

1-21 Analysis reports are available for composted manure/treated biosolids. 5 R

Audit Checklist Compost

Page 29: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Other Crop Management Practices to Decrease Crop Contact with Soil

•  Use trellis/staking where appropriate, such as tomatoes.

•  Use plastic mulch and drip irrigation to reduce leaf wetting.

•  Use organic mulches/ cover crops to reduce splash.

http://news.msue.msu.edu/sites/msue/uploads/images/5-18-1%20Plastic%20much%20with%20cukes%20MATHIEU.jpg

Page 30: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Other Animal Byproducts •  E.g.,  bloodmeal,  bonemeal,  fish  emulsion,  feathermeal  

•  Check  the  process    • Watch  for  contaminaCon  with  manure    •  OMRI  approved?      -­‐important  for  organic  producCon  

•  Proposed  rule:  consider  ‘treated’  or  ‘untreated’  using  same  standards  as  for  manure  

•  No  biosolids  (ECGA,  FSMA)  http://www.dnr.wisconsin.gov/org/caer/ce/eek/earth/images/fertilizer.gif

Page 31: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Example of Test for Microbes in Fertilizer

Page 32: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Indiana Biosolid Rules •  Food crops shall not be harvested

–  fourteen (14) months after application of a biosolid if the harvested part: •  touches the ground where biosolid has been applied; and •  has no harvested parts below the soil surface.

–  twenty (20) months after application of a biosolid if: •  the biosolid remains on the land surface for four (4) months or longer prior to

incorporation into the soil; and •  harvested parts are below the soil surface.

–  thirty-eight (38) months after application of biosolid if: •  the biosolid remains on the land surface for less than four (4) months prior to

incorporation into the soil; and •  harvested parts are below the soil surface.

–  Unless subsection (a), (b), or (c) applies, food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for thirty (30) days after application of biosolid.

Page 33: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Summary •  Know the history of your site and current

environment •  Keep animals and run-off from their waste away

from crops and irrigation water •  Applying and incorporate manure early •  Compost reduces risk •  Research soil amendment processing method •  No biosolids in produce production

Page 34: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Purdue  University  is  an  Equal  Opportunity/Equal  Access  InsCtuCon  

Funded  in  part  by  a  USDA  Specialty  Crops  Block  Grant  from  the  Indiana  State  Department  of  Agriculture  

Questions?

Page 35: Good Agricultural Practices Site Selection and Soil Amendments · Audit Checklist: Site history and soils Questions Points YES NO N/A Doc 1-23 A previous land use risk assessment

Acknowledgments Por$ons  of  this  presenta$on  adapted  from  the  work  of:  Modified by

Ellen Phillips, University of Illinois Extension Liz Maynard, Purdue University

North Carolina GAPS Karl Shaffer – Dept. of Soil Science, NCSU Alexandria Graves – Dept. of Soil Science, NCSU Fletcher Arritt – Dept. of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, NCSU Rhonda Sherman – Dept. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, NCSU Deanna Osmond – Dept. of Soil Science, NCSU Chris Gunter – Dept. of Horticultural Science, NCSU Billy Little – N.C. Cooperative Extension, Wilson County Center

Cornell GAPS

Par$ally  Funded  by:    • Purdue, as part of AgSEED Crossroads funding to support Indiana's Agriculture and Rural Development • USDA Specialty Crops Block Grant from the Indiana State Dept. of Agriculture