Golden Ratio Stats

download Golden Ratio Stats

of 12

Transcript of Golden Ratio Stats

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    1/12

    Mateo Solano

    The Golden Ratio & the Human Body

    Stats 1510 Night

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    2/12

    Introduction

    The Golden Ratio is a number that seems to appear everywhere in nature so much so

    that it has also been called the Divine Proportion because many believe that this

    number is all by which nature is governed. It is based on the Fibonacci numbers. These

    are a series of numbers that begin with 0 and 1 after that you follow the rule of adding

    the last two numbers to get the next 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610,

    987,... and so on. "A special value, closely related to the Fibonacci series, is called the

    golden section; this value is obtained by taking the ratio of successive terms in the

    Fibonacci series"(1). The Golden Section is yet another name for the Golden Ratio.

    The Golden Ratio is denoted by the Greek symbol Phi and can be determined when

    the measurement of A is added to the measurement of B and divided by the

    measurement of A giving you (A + B)/A. Phi is equal to approximately 1.61803399.

    "The Golden Section, also known as Phi, is manifested in the structure of the human

    body. If the length of the hand has the value of 1, for instance, then the combined length

    of hand + forearm has the approximate value of Phi." (2) Similarly the proportion of

    navel to top of head to + shoulder line to top of head is in the same ratio of 1: Phi .The

    purpose of this research project was to determine if in fact these measurements would

    result in the ratio of 1:Phi or the Golden Ratio. The measurements were taken from two

    populations the first was adult males over the age of 18 and the second was adult

    females over the age of 18. In collecting the data 40 males and 40 females for a total of

    80 subjects were measured for the length in inches from the above mentioned areas to

    establish the two ratios and determine whether those ratios were in fact calculated to be

    the Golden Ratio. These two sets of data were then compared to each other.

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    3/12

    Methods and Materials

    In collecting the data 40 random males and 40 random females were approached in

    various locations and asked if they wouldn't mind being measured from their fingertips

    to the their elbows from their wrist to their elbows and from their shoulder line to the top

    of their heads and from their navels to the top of their heads. Each subject was

    measured using a five foot body measuring tape. The results were recorded on paper

    and transferred into tcstats on an ipad.

    Results

    Neither the males nor the female measurements when calculated using the formula (A +

    B)/A resulted in the Golden Ratio and although the mean for both male and female ratio

    # 2 did produce a number close to Phi it was in fact not Phi. Tables 1.1 and 2.1 list the

    five number summary for each ratio both female and male respectively along with the

    population standard deviation and sample standard deviation, as well as the sum of all

    the data for the sample which was equivalent to 40 males and 40 females or n = 40; n

    being the sample size. Tables 1.2 and 2.2 list the five number summary of female and

    male respectively for each of the measurements, along with the population standard

    deviation and sample standard deviation, as well as the sum of all the data for the

    sample which was equivalent to 40 males and 40 females or n = 40; n being the sample

    size. The five number summary consists of the minimum data value for each ratio, the

    Q1 value, such that no more than 25% of all values are smaller and no more than 75%

    are larger, the mean which is the average and the number that represents the center

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    4/12

    point of the data, the Q3 value, such that no more than 75% of all values are smaller

    and no more than 25% are larger, and finally the maximum value of the data set. As

    you can see from reading table 1.1 the average for female ratio #1 was 1.415585 which

    represented the mean of the sum of the measurements from the shoulder line to the top

    of the head and the navel to the top of the head divided by the length of measurement

    from the navel to the top of the head. This number was not the Golden Ratio. The

    same calculation was used to calculate female ratio #2 which was the sum of the

    measurements from the middle fingertip to the elbow and the wrist to the elbow divided

    by the length of measurement from the middle finger to the elbow; and as can be read

    in Table 1.1 the average of the this data set came out to be 1.613727 which again

    comes close to the numerical value of Phi but is not the Golden Ratio itself.

    In this research age was not taken into consideration other than the fact that the

    subjects were considered to be adults if over the age of 18. The only place where the

    data might have been affected from this would be in the female measurements from the

    navel to the top of the head as there was a deviation of over one and a half inches.

    Although even with this deviation the deviation in ratio #1 was very small, the sample

    standard deviation being 0.03082269. Likewise the deviation in ratio #2 was also very

    small, 0.0340273.

    The same holds true for the male data listed in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. The standard

    deviation was more than one and a half inches (1.713) from the navel to the top of the

    head but the overall deviation for the ratio was very small (0.03323601). The male data

    also when input into the calculation for the Golden Ratio failed to produce Phi as the

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    5/12

    result. Also just as in the female data the mean for ratio #2 was numerically close to the

    Golden Ratio but was in fact not Phi. All of the figures for the male data can be seen in

    Tables 2.1 and 2.2

    A visual representation of the data can be seen in figures 1.1 for and 1.2 for both of the

    female ratios and 2.1 and 2.3 for the male ratios. Both sets of box and whisker plots

    show the distribution of data to be symmetrical. The graphs are based on the data from

    Tables 1.1 and 2.1 for the female and male five number summaries respectively.

    Table 1.1

    Table 2.1

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    6/12

    Table 1.2

    Table 2.2

    Figure 1.1

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    7/12

    Figure 2.1

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    8/12

    Appendix

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    9/12

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    10/12

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    11/12

    Head to Shoulder

    Line

    Navel to top of

    Head

    Female Ratio

    #1

    Finger to

    Elbow

    Wrist to

    Elbow

    Female Ratio

    2

    10.5 26 1.44 17.5 11.5 1.6

    10 25.5 1.3922 16.5 10 1.6

    11.5 27 1.4259 17 10.5 1.6

    11 30.5 1.3607 17.5 10 1.511 26 1.4231 17 11 1.6

    12 27.5 1.4364 17.5 11 1.6

    11 25 1.44 17.5 11 1.6

    10.5 24 1.4375 16.5 10.5 1.6

    10 25.5 1.3922 17 11.5 1.6

    11 26 1.4231 17.5 10 1.5

    11 27 1.4074 15 9

    10 26 1.3846 16 10.5 1.6

    12 27 1.4444 18 10.5 1.5

    11 23 1.4783 15 8.5 1.59.5 25 1.38 16 9 1.5

    10 25 1.4 14.5 9 1.6

    10 24.5 1.4082 16.5 10.5 1.6

    11 29 1.3793 15.5 9 1.5

    11 28 1.3929 16.5 10 1.6

    11.5 25 1.46 15.5 9 1.5

    10.5 25.5 1.4118 14.5 9.5 1.6

    11 25 1.44 14.5 9 1.6

    10.5 27 1.3889 17.5 11 1.6

    11.5 28.5 1.4035 17 10.5 1.6

    11.5 27 1.4259 16.5 10.5 1.6

    10.5 27 1.3889 17 11 1.6

    10.5 23 1.4565 16 9.5 1.5

    9 27 1.3333 15 10 1.6

    10.5 24 1.4375 16 10 1.

    10 25 1.4 16.5 9 1.5

    11 25 1.44 16 9.5 1.5

    11.5 25.5 1.451 16.5 10 1.6

    10 22.5 1.4444 16 9.5 1.5

    10 25 1.4 16 10 1.

    11 25 1.44 16 9 1.5

    10 24.5 1.4082 16 9 1.5

    9.5 26.5 1.3585 18 10.5 1.5

    10 24 1.4167 18 11.5 1.6

    11 24.5 1.449 16 10.5 1.6

    11 26 1.4231 16.5 10 1.6

    Adult female data

  • 8/2/2019 Golden Ratio Stats

    12/12

    Navel to

    Head

    Head to Shoulder

    Line

    Male Ratio

    #1

    Finger to

    Elbow

    Wrist to

    Elbow

    Male Ratio

    #2

    24 9 1.375 17.5 10.5 1.6

    25 10 1.4 17 10.5 1.6176

    27 11 1.4074 18 10.5 1.5833

    28.5 11 1.386 17 9.5 1.558829 9 1.3103 18 11.5 1.6389

    26 10 1.3846 16.5 10 1.6061

    27 11 1.4074 18 11 1.6111

    27 11 1.4074 17 9.5 1.5588

    26.5 11.5 1.434 17.5 10.5 1.6

    27 12 1.4444 18.5 11 1.5946

    24 11 1.4583 18.5 11.5 1.6216

    26.5 12 1.4528 18 10 1.5556

    25.5 10.5 1.4118 16.5 9.5 1.5758

    26 11.5 1.4423 17.5 10 1.571425 11 1.44 15.5 11 1.7097

    24 11 1.4583 17 10 1.5882

    26 11 1.4231 18.5 11 1.5946

    28 10 1.3571 18 11 1.6111

    27 11 1.4074 18 11 1.6111

    26.5 11 1.4151 18.5 12 1.6486

    25 11.5 1.451 17 11 1.6471

    28 12 1.4286 17 10.5 1.6176

    27.5 10.5 1.3818 16 10 1.625

    26.5 10.5 1.3962 17 10 1.5882

    26.5 11 1.4151 20 11.5 1.575

    25.5 11 1.4314 17 11 1.6471

    25 10 1.4 18.5 10.5 1.5676

    28 12 1.4286 18.5 10 1.5405

    28 12 1.4286 19 11 1.5789

    30 12 1.4 18 11.5 1.6389

    28 11 1.3929 18 12 1.6667

    27.5 11 1.4 18.5 11 1.5946

    30 10.5 1.35 17 11.5 1.6765

    23.5 11 1.4681 19 12 1.6316

    26.5 10.5 1.3559 18.5 10 1.5405

    27.5 11.5 1.4182 18.5 10.5 1.5676

    29 12.5 1.431 17 10.5 1.6176

    28.5 11 1.386 18.5 10.5 1.5676

    28.5 11 1.386 17 10 1.5882

    30.5 11.5 1.377 19.5 12.5 1.641

    Adult male data