Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 - Part A Section 1 · The Gold Coast has evolved rapidly...
Transcript of Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 - Part A Section 1 · The Gold Coast has evolved rapidly...
Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report
2 1
Figure 1 How the Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 fits within Council’s planning framework
Annual City Budget
Gold Coast 2020 Vision
City Plan 2012-2020
Long-term plans and strategies Gold Coast City Transport
Strategy 2031
Operational Plan Transport Implementation Plan
The Gold Coast is a unique city bordered by rainforest hinterland that includes world heritage-listed national parks to the west, and 54 kilometres of beautiful beaches to the east. Characterised by a relaxed lifestyle, premier sporting and entertainment events and an abundance of recreational pursuits, the Gold Coast is famous for fun. These attributes draw people to the city from all over Australia and the world to live, work and play.
The Gold Coast has evolved rapidly over the past 50 years from a series of small coastal settlements to the sixth largest city in Australia. Our city is now home to 513,954 people and is forecast to reach almost 800,000 people by 20311. Added to the pressure placed on the city by population growth, the Gold Coast has in excess of 10 million visitors per year, creating additional demand on the city’s infrastructure.
Effective transport systems are integral to the success of any modern city – they connect us to our families, friends, jobs, amenities and communities. As we continue to grow, Gold Coast City Council must plan for the future, to enhance these connections and to protect our lifestyle. Unless we change our travel behaviour, traffic congestion will significantly affect our economy, lifestyle and environment.
Purpose of this technical reportThis technical report underpins the Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031, which is our blueprint for the city’s transport network over the next 20 years, with a particular focus on the years leading up to the 2018 Commonwealth Games. It provides a plan to keep the Gold Coast moving in the face of higher energy costs, increasing congestion and the need for responsible financial management.
The strategy will guide transport policy and investment decisions, ensuring transport funding is allocated in ways that deliver maximum benefits for the people of the Gold Coast and those who visit our city.
Planning context The Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 supersedes the previous Gold Coast City Transport Plan 1998. Since the release of the 1998 plan, there have been considerable changes to our city, the region and the state along with other external factors that have influenced the way people live and move around our city. Some of these include:
an increase in the city’s population by 39 per cent from 369,500 (1997) to 513,954 (2011)
the release of the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031 (2009)
the release of Connecting SEQ 2031: An Integrated Regional Transport Plan for South East Queensland (2011)
review of the local planning scheme
the start of construction on the Gold Coast light rail project
the definition of new local government boundaries (2008)
the announcement that the Gold Coast will host the 2018 Commonwealth Games (2011)
external issues that influence travel behaviour, such as the increasing price of oil and higher obesity levels.
1. ABS and Office of Statistical Research (2012) Estimated Resident Population
1. Introduction
Part A - Setting the scene
Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report
3 4
Figure 2 How consultation shaped the transport strategy
Gold Coast Transport Strategy
Bold Future community consultation
Discussion Paper - “Our Transport Future”
Workshops with key stakeholders
Figure 3 Mode share on the Gold Coast
1992 2004 2007 2009
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
85%
8%
4%
1%
Sour
ce: D
epar
tmen
t of T
rans
port
and
Mai
n Ro
ads
(M
odel
ling
and
Dat
a A
naly
sis C
entr
e) 2
011
Hou
seho
ld T
rave
l Sur
veys
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
C/gatta Surfers Southport Nerang Robina Coomera
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
C/gatta Surfers Southport Nerang Robina Coomera
Figure 4 No car households by suburb (2006 Census data)
Figure 5 Percentage of walking trips to work by suburb
South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031
The South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031 provides the framework for the overall development of the region. Population projections propose a need to develop a total of 143,000 new dwellings on the Gold Coast by 2031 (about 5700 new dwellings each year up until 2031).
An important focus of the regional plan is to continue the trend towards urban infill and regeneration, and to ensure new communities are developed along public transport corridors and contain a mix of uses, like services and employment, linked by direct walking and cycling paths.
In contrast to previous decades, the Gold Coast is expected to accommodate much of its future population growth in existing urban areas. The regional plan suggests approximately 22 per cent of new dwellings would be in the major broadhectare development areas of Coomera, Pimpama, Reedy Creek and Maudsland. The remaining 78 per cent would be achieved through development or redevelopment within existing urban areas, giving a total of almost 100,000 new infill dwellings over the next 20 years.
Connecting SEQ 2031
Connecting SEQ 2031 is the strategic plan for meeting the transport challenges facing South East Queensland and is an action of the South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009-2031. Council will partner with the Queensland and Commonwealth governments to deliver transport infrastructure and services to meet the city’s transport needs over the next 20 years. Connecting SEQ 2031 establishes specific targets for the Gold Coast to increase the use of public and active transport and reduce car trips.
Working with government
The Queensland Government is the lead agency with overall responsibility for planning and providing public transport services, infrastructure, strategic transport planning, managing the state-controlled road network, and the regulation of taxi services. The Commonwealth Government also contributes funding for transport in Queensland (for example, the Gold Coast light rail project). The Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031 aims
to align Council transport initiatives with State Government plans and strategies.
Planning our transport future together
Community consultation
Council has worked closely with the Gold Coast community to develop this strategy. In late 2012, we released the draft transport strategy for community consultation. More than 2500 Gold Coast residents, businesses and organisations took part.
What people talked to us about
Public transport – 46% of comments Walking and cycling – 14.4% of comments Road network – 10.2% of comments Parking – 3.9% of comments Travel behaviour change – 2.1% of
comments Other – 22.6% of comments (including
general support for the strategy, personal mobility vehicles and support to commence implementation)
Consultation showed us that public transport is clearly the community’s biggest transport concern, 46 per cent were about the need for better public transport, whereas 10.2% were about roads and traffic. This strategy sets out a plan for significant improvements to the public and active transport network, as well as targeted road upgrades to ensure the Gold Coast keeps moving into the future.
Key stakeholder consultation
Council held a number of workshops with transport industry stakeholders, including representatives from Gold Coast City Council, the Department of Transport and Main Roads and specialist planning consultancies. The workshops took a collaborative and interactive approach to exploring transport solutions for the city, which helped to determine realistic public and active transport initiatives across the Gold Coast that can be implemented by Council and the Department of Transport and Main Roads.
2. How we travel today
Mode shareIn 2009, 87 per cent of all trips made on the Gold Coast were by private vehicle (refer to Figure 3 Mode share on the Gold Coast) - a steady increase from 83 per cent in 1992. Public transport made up 4 per cent of trips, up from 3 per cent in 1992. Cycling was 1 per cent, down from 3 per cent in 1992, and although walking increased slightly from 2007, to 8 per cent in 2009, it is still lower than the 10 per cent share in 19922.
Around 47 per cent of Gold Coast residents use no public transport at all and are solely reliant on cars for all trips. This is comparable with the Sunshine Coast, where 50 per cent of residents identify themselves as non-public transport users. This is significantly higher than Brisbane where 30 per cent of residents identify themselves as non-public transport users.
2. Modelling Data and Analysis Centre (2011) Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads
Different travel experiences across the city
Travel experiences vary across the city. For example, Figure 4 No car households by suburb and Figure 5 Percentage of walking trips to work by suburb show that those people living in higher-density areas (Coolangatta, Southport and Surfers Paradise) are less likely to own a car and more likely to walk to work than those in lower-density areas (Nerang, Robina and Coomera). This shows that in urban environments where there is the right mix of density, connectivity and quality public and active transport links people will embrace more sustainable transport options and reduce car ownership.
The Gold Coast’s outer, low-density suburbs are likely to continue to remain highly car-dependent, although there is room for significant improvement in public and active transport use in these areas. The activity centres across the city have developed more densely, providing greater public and active transport options. High-density mixed-use activity centres are vital economic drivers for the city and their accessibility must be strategically managed to ensure that they remain attractive, functional and vibrant.
Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report
5 6
Commute profile - Greater Brisbane Destination
North-East(64,702)
North-West(50,605)
Inner(65,523)
CBD(189,761)
South-East(17,812)
South-West(91,054)
Scale: Approximately 5,000 trips
Origin
Moreton(105,856)
North-East(55,893)
North-West(42,588)
Inner(95,122)
CBD(34,641)
South-East(57,747)
South-West(85,796)
Ipswich(45,916)
Logan(116,544)
Commute profile - Gold Coast Destination
Brisbane
North GC
Helensvale and Oxenford
North of Southport
Nerang, Ashmoreand Carrara
Southport
Surfers, Broadbeach and Mermaid
beachside
Surfers, Broadbeach and Mermaid inland
Robina and Merrimac
Burleigh and Varsity
South GC
South GC inlandTweed
Origin
Brisbane
North GC
Helensvale and Oxenford
North of Southport
Nerang, Ashmoreand Carrara
Southport
Surfers, Broadbeach and Mermaid
beachsideSurfers, Broadbeach and Mermaid inland
Robina and Merrimac
Burleigh and Varsity
South GC
South GC inland
Tweed
Scale: Approximately 2,000 trips
27%
17%
15%
12%
10%
11%
8%
Work trips
Shopping
Social recreation
Serve passenger
Education
Accompany
Personal business
(Sou
rce:
MD
AC
201
1)
Figure 7 2009 trip purpose - Gold Coast
Varsity Station Village
West Burleigh
Treetops Plaza
Varsity Lakes station
Coomera station
Helensvale station
Robina station
Nerang station
Ormeau station
Beenleigh station
Varsity Lakes station
Coomera station
Helensvale station
Robina station
Nerang station
Ormeau station
Beenleigh station
Gold Coast AirportGold Coast Airport
Legend
GCCC boundary
Pacific Motorway
Multi-modal arterial
Train station
Train line
Principal regional activity centre
Major activity centre
Specialist activity centre
District activity centre
Map not to scale
Varsity Lakes
Bundall
ElanoraCurrumbin
Hope Island
Maudsland
Reedy Creek
Mermaid Beach
Tugun
Palm Beach
Upper Coomera
Mt Tamborine
South StradbrokeIsland
JacobsWell
Mudgeeraba
Springbrook
CedarCreek
Tweed City Council
Steiglitz
Runaway Bay
Oxenford
Varsity Central/ Bond University
Mermaid Waters
Southport Park
Ashmore Plaza
Ashmore City
Gold Coast Health and Knowledge Precinct
Hinze Dam
Yatala
BiggeraWaters
Pimpama
Ormeau
Coomera
Nerang
Broadbeach
Surfers
Southport
Helensvale
Paradise
Beenleigh
Robina
Burleigh Heads
Coolangatta
Brisbane is a radial city with a large number of work trips focused on a single CBD. The Gold Coast has a more even spread of work
destinations and trips as it is a multi-centred city.
Figure 8 Comparison of Gold Coast and Brisbane journey to work trips
(Sou
rce:
Dep
artm
ent o
f Tra
nspo
rt a
nd M
ain
Road
s M
odel
ling,
Dat
a an
d A
naly
sis C
entr
e)
Figure 6 Gold Coast centres network
Where and why people travelWork trips, including business trips throughout the work day, are the most common trip purpose, responsible for 27 per cent of all trips on the Gold Coast, followed by shopping trips at 17 per cent and social/recreation trips at 15 per cent. The split of trip purpose on the Gold Coast is shown in Figure 7 2009 trip purpose - Gold Coast. Although work trips make up less than a third of all trips (27 per cent), they account for 43 per cent of all kilometres travelled on the Gold Coast.
Key trip generators
Southport, Robina and Coomera are the Gold Coast’s principal activity centres. Southport and Robina currently provide the bulk of civic, business and health services. Coastal centres such as Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach provide tourism accommodation, entertainment, retail and dining, while Burleigh Heads and Coolangatta offer an attractive beach village atmosphere. Nerang and Helensvale are key retail and commercial centres.
Journeys to work
The Gold Coast differs from other similar-sized cities in that it does not have a dominant central business district (CBD).
Figure 8 Comparison of Gold Coast and Brisbane journey to work trips shows the origin and destination of Gold Coast
commuters and Brisbane commuters. For the Gold Coast, it demonstrates how jobs and residences are located all over the city, not focused on one major destination. The city’s structure presents opportunities and challenges: it helps balance transport trips across the entire network, but makes providing high-quality public transport services across multiple centres difficult.
By comparison, Brisbane’s journeys to work are much more focused on one central CBD.
Currently, 86 per cent of journeys to work are within Gold Coast City Council boundaries, with around 7 per cent heading north towards Brisbane. Work trips to Brisbane will continue to be a major trip generator from the Gold Coast, as well as construction jobs, with workers travelling daily to the Logan and Ipswich regions.
Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report
7 8
Figure 9 Mode choices of visitors
52%
14%
33%
1%
Vehicle
Public transport
Walking
Cycling
(Sou
rce:
MD
AC
201
1)
Legend
GCCC boundary
Pacific Motorway
Multi-modal arterial
Train station
Train line
Roads with more weekend traffic than peak weekdays
Roads with similar weekend traffic to peak weekdays
Hope Island Road
Smith Street Motorway
Gold Coast Highway
Waterways Drive/Sea World Drive
Main Beach Parade
Thomas Drive
Hooker Boulevard/Nerang - Broadbeach Road
Brisbane Road
Musgrave Avenue
Smith Street
Nerang - Broadbeach Road
Nielsens Road
Gooding Drive/Nerang - Broadbeach Road
Bermuda Street
Rio Vista Boulevard
Markeri Street
Pacific Motorway
Robina Parkway
Christine Avenue
Reedy Creek Road
Map not to scale
Varsity Lakes
Bundall
ElanoraCurrumbin
Hope Island
Maudsland
Reedy Creek
Mermaid Beach
Tugun
Palm Beach
Upper Coomera
Mt Tamborine
South StradbrokeIsland
JacobsWell
Springbrook
CedarCreek
Tweed City Council
Steiglitz
MudgeerabaHinze Dam
Yatala
BiggeraWaters
Pimpama
Ormeau
Coomera
Nerang
Broadbeach
Surfers
Southport
Helensvale
Paradise
Beenleigh
Robina
Burleigh Heads
Coolangatta
Varsity Lakes station
Coomera station
Helensvale station
Robina station
Nerang station
Ormeau station
Beenleigh station
Varsity Lakes station
Coomera station
Helensvale station
Robina station
Nerang station
Ormeau station
Beenleigh station
GriffithUniversity
BondUniversity
GriffithUniversity
BondUniversity
Gold Coast AirportGold Coast Airport
Figure 10 Roads that experience high weekend traffic
Tourist travel
Roughly half of all trips made by visitors are made by car (see Figure 9 Mode choices of visitors). Visitors to the Gold Coast do, however, frequently choose to walk to activities. Public transport is a popular option for visitors, with 14 per cent of all visitor trips taken by public transport (compared to only 4 per cent of Gold Coast residents). Although visitors take more than half of their trips by car, they have a low impact on total road demand. During the peak holiday period, visitors represent an estimated 3 per cent of all drivers on the Gold Coast during the morning peak period and 5 per cent in the afternoon.
The Department of Transport and Main Roads is currently collecting more data on visitor travel patterns and updating the transport planning modelling tools to improve visitor
modelling, and allow planning for projects to take into account the effect that tourist travel has on the Gold Coast transport network.
Weekend travel
The Gold Coast experiences unique weekend travel characteristics when compared to similar-sized cities. The coastal strip’s beaches, shops and dining areas attract a large number of discretionary trips from residents. In addition to the high demand placed on the network by tourists, the Gold Coast attracts large numbers of day trippers on weekends from neighbouring areas such as Brisbane, Logan and Tweed Shire. As a result, a number of key roads experience traffic levels on weekends matching or exceeding the weekday commuting peak. Figure 10 Roads that experience high weekend traffic demand shows which roads currently experience these high traffic demands.
Some major roads carry up to 50 per cent more traffic on weekends at peak times compared with weekday peak times. On these roads, the weekend period can account for as much as 60 per cent of total traffic for the whole week. By comparison, peak traffic for a major road not affected by weekend travel is typically 45 per cent less than the weekday commuting peak and only accounts for about 20 per cent of all traffic for the week.
Most of the roads identified on Figure 10 experience congestion on weekdays and weekends, creating inconvenience and delay for residents and visitors. With growth in both resident and visitor numbers expected in future, a key challenge will be to manage demand and make improvements to these routes so that economic activity is supported.
Recreational boat travel
With an abundance of waterways, the Gold Coast is a haven for boating, water sports and fishing. Canals are just one of a number of water accesses and Council has a program to maintain these throughout the city. Maintenance involves the removal of problem vegetation and dredging on canal banks to restore desired profiles.
Our local waterways, canal estates and marinas have supported the development of a significant marine sector on the Gold Coast. Currently the Gold Coast has 26,992 registered boats and the southern portion of South East Queensland has 69,778 registered boats. The Navigation Channel network links together the Broadwater, Moreton Bay, the Gold Coast Seaway (Ocean) and Gold Coast Marine Precincts (Coomera and Steiglitz). It is the backbone of the local marine industry, supports the tourism sector and is significant to the Gold Coast lifestyle.
Gold Coast City Transport Strategy 2031: Technical Report
9 10
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%
Gold Coast
Adelaide
Perth
Brisbane
Melbourne
Sydney
0%2%4%6%8%10%12%14%
Figure 11 Public transport mode share in Australian cities (2006)
BeenleighBeenleigh
CoomeraCoomera
SouthportSouthport
Surfers ParadiseSurfers ParadiseBundallBundallNerangNerang
BroadbeachBroadbeach
RobinaRobina
CoolangattaCoolangattaCoolangatta - TweedCoolangatta - Tweed
Accessibility
< 15 mins
15 - 30 mins
30 - 45 mins
45 - 60 mins
> 60 mins
Figure 12 Public transport and walking accessibility to employment
(Sou
rce:
MD
AC
201
1)
3. Our transport challenges
Traffic congestion Traffic congestion is fast becoming a major challenge for the Gold Coast as the city grows and develops. If not addressed, congestion will cost the Gold Coast in lower productivity, poorer health and a greater imbalance of work/family life. Increasing congestion levels will undermine the attractive lifestyle enjoyed by our city’s residents and visitors. A gridlocked city is not an attractive place to live or visit.
It is forecast that the avoidable costs of traffic congestion in Australian cities will exceed $20 billion by 20203, caused primarily by:
workers spending more time in traffic rather than at work – causing a loss in productivity for businesses
slowing down the movement of freight as trucks fall behind schedule due to congestion.
In the urbanised areas of the Gold Coast, there is little scope for large-scale expansion of road capacity without affecting the quality of life that attracts people to live and holiday here. A balanced approach to transport investment and management is required so that people who do not need to travel by car are provided with real transport alternatives that leave room for those who do need to drive (such as tradespeople and freight traffic).
One of the most harmful effects of traffic congestion is its impact on the environment. Stop-start driving, for example, produces large volumes of carbon emissions that contribute to climate change. The Gold Coast’s natural environment – from our extensive waterways and expansive hinterland – is sensitive to phenomena like climate change. To protect our natural environment, we must reduce or cease the practices that threaten to erode its beauty by developing transport systems that move our city into an environmentally healthy future.
Car dependenceCar travel has been the main focus of the Gold Coast’s transport system for the past 50 years, resulting in low public transport use compared to many other Australian cities (see Figure 11 Public transport mode share in Australian cities (2006).
The share of trips by car increased from 83 per cent in 1992 to 87 per cent in 2009 (see Figure 3 Mode share on the Gold Coast). Vehicle ownership rates across the city are also rising. In 2001, there were 213,118 cars registered on the Gold Coast. In 2012, this rose to 320,100 – an increase of 50 per cent. The Gold Coast has an average of 1.8 motor vehicles per dwelling (excluding motorbikes and scooters).
Figure 12 Public transport and walking accessibility to employment indicates that good walking and public transport access to employment is best along the coastal areas and a few inland pockets. About 19 per cent of workers have an active travel or public transport journey of less than 30 minutes. Moving a short distance inland from the coastal areas, journey times to employment
by public transport and walking increase to over 45 minutes with the exception of a few pockets. Nearly 50 per cent of journeys to work (from within the Gold Coast) by public transport would take 45 minutes or longer, which is nearly twice the average travel time for current work commuting trips on the Gold Coast.
In summary, key ‘journey to work’ statistics show:
Gold Coast work trips are nearly twice the distance of all other trip purposes
on average, Gold Coast workers commute 17.6 kilometres to work with an average travel time of 26 minutes
22 per cent of work trips are less than 5 kilometres and within active transport range, however, only 6 per cent of people choose to walk or cycle to work
work trips generate 43 per cent of kilometres travelled on the road network.
Energy, oil and climate changeThe Gold Coast’s location, growth, development and demand for services increase its exposure to the effects of climate change.
Council’s Climate Change Strategy 2009-2014 provides direction for responding to climate change challenges, such as developing plans to reduce the city’s carbon emissions. In Australia, cars produce an average of 0.3 kilograms of greenhouse gas per kilometre travelled4 and in South East Queensland, transport activity accounts for approximately 22 per cent of carbon emissions5.
Energy from all sources is likely to become more expensive in the future. The reduced supply of oil-based motor fuels as well as the possible slowing of growth in oil production will affect how we move around the city. Relying on car-dependent lifestyles and buildings and transport modes that are carbon intensive or use large amounts of fossil fuels exposes us to major risks in the future.
As well as increased carbon emissions and reduced and expensive supply of fuel, the city’s infrastructure will be impaired by other gradual and long-term effects of climate change. These include increased temperatures, rising sea levels and increases in the intensity of extreme weather events such as cyclones, storm surges and heavy rainfall. Strengthening the resilience of infrastructure to these threats is essential for minimising risks to the community and the economy.
A fast growing and multi-centred cityBefore World War II, Australian cities were reasonably compact and relied heavily on railways, tramways and buses as the dominant mode of passenger transport. The post-war era saw some major changes, such as the increasing ability of ordinary families to own a private car. Car ownership gave greater mobility and created demand for new car-based suburbs at the fringe of existing cities. Construction of modern roads to better link the Gold Coast with Brisbane and New South Wales opened up new development opportunities along the Coast and in new inland centres.
3. Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics (2007) Estimating Urban Traffic Congestion Cost Trends for Australian Cities, Working Paper 71
4. New South Wales Government (2011) A Walking Strategy for New South Wales
5. ICLEI Local Government for Sustainability (2009) South East Queensland Regional Plan Climate Change Project: Phase 2 Emissions Analysis