Going Places Policy Roundtable Workshop Presentation
description
Transcript of Going Places Policy Roundtable Workshop Presentation
Policy Roundtable Workshop
June 8, 2011
Agenda
Going Places Overview
Presentation of Final Preferred Land Use Scenario
Presentation and Discussion of Potential Implementation Concepts
A region-based land use planning initiative designed for developing a
shared regional future land use framework for the year 2040
Planning Process and Scope
We are here
Study Area covers Greene, Miami, and Montgomery counties and Cities of Carlisle, Franklin, and Springboro in Warren County
Phase I Existing Condition Assessment:Completed Studies
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Agriculture/Open Space
Population
In the Past
0
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
ProjectedPopulation Growth
ProjectedEmployment Growth
Land Needed toAccommodate
Projected Populationand Employment
Growth
Total Increase inDeveloped Land asProjected in LocalLand Use Plans
Dayton+
Xenia+
Troy+
Springboro+
etc.
Into the Future
Phase II Future Landscape Exploration:How and Where should the Region develop?
Scenario Building through Civic Engagement
First Workshop with the Steering and Planning Advisory Committee members
17 Community-based workshops
15 Focused Group workshops Social and cultural group Business and economic
development group Transportation and infrastructure
group Environmental group Planning group Higher education group Young professional group Middle/High school group
Scenario Assessment through Performance Indicators
Future Land Use Scenarios and Assessment
Seven alternative future land use scenarios addressing the question “where and in what ways should the region develop by 2040?”
Assessment of the potential effects of each scenario on the region measured using a set of 12 performance indicators
Sharing Seven Scenarios and Assessment Results
Phase III Building a Clear and Shared Regional Land Use Framework
Identify, develop, and evaluate a preferred scenario
Develop and build consensus around the 2040 Regional Growth Framework
Seek approval from the MVRPC Board of Directors
The 2040 Regional Growth Framework will be more than a map – it will also
represent the core values, principles, and characteristics of the Miami Valley and include recommendations for regional
policies and strategies for implementation
Process and Timeline
Final Preferred Scenario
Identify the final preferred scenario using: Distribution of participants amongst the seven scenarios during the
scenario building workshops Scenario voting results from the Going Places Steering and Planning
Advisory Committee members, public open houses, and mail and web surveys
Results from the phone survey
Evaluate the final preferred scenario using the 12 performance indicators
Workshop Summary by Theme
# of Participants
% of Participants
Business as Usual Development 19 3%Infill/Conservation Development 290 48%Asset-based Development 178 29%Radial Corridor Development 64 11%Unrestricted Development 22 4%Create Your Own 36 6%TOTAL 609 100%
How People Voted
Three ways to vote:At the Open HousesOnlineVia mail surveyOther inputPhone survey
Open House Voting – 84 Votes
Asset-BasedDevelopment
19%
Business-As-Usual Development
4%
Infill/Conservation Development
40%
Radial Corridor Development
2%
Unrestricted Development
4%
Mixed-Themes Development
26%
Jobs & Destinations Development
5%
Online Voting – 535 Votes
Asset-Based Development
28%
Business-As-Usual Development
4%
Infill/Conservation Development
40%
Radial Corridor Development
2%
Unrestricted Development
4%
Mixed-Themes Development
19%
Jobs & Destinations Development
3%
Mail Survey – 607 Votes
Asset-Based Development
18%
Business-As-Usual Development
2%
Infill/Conservation Development
19%
Radial Corridor Development
1%Unrestricted Development
4%
Mixed-Themes Development
40%
Jobs & Destinations Development
12%
Multiple Scenarios
4%
Total Votes – 1,226 Votes
Asset-Based Development
22%
Business-As-Usual Development
3%
Infill/Conservation Development
30%Radial Corridor Development
1%
Unrestricted Development
4%
Mixed-Themes Development
30%
Jobs & Destinations Development
8%
Multiple Scenarios
2%
Phone Survey
Conducted by the Center for Urban and Public Affairs at Wright State University
Representative sample of 400 participants Series of questions designed to indicate the values of the
participants with respect to land use Analysis by CUPA indicates that the Infill/Conservation
Development scenario had the highest degree of support Some support also for Asset-Based Development and Mixed-
Themes Development
Final Preferred Scenario
Based on voting and phone survey results, the final preferred scenario is a combination of three scenarios:Infill/Conservation DevelopmentAsset-Based DevelopmentMixed Themes Development
Concentrated DevelopmentThe Final Preferred Scenario
Future development focused around regional assets Future development concentrated in areas with existing
support infrastructure Encouraging the rehabilitation and/or repurposing of existing
structures Increasing the number and quality of transportation options Reviving the Region’s core city and older communities Using land in a way that builds a sense of community
Potential Implementation Concepts
What we’re going to do today:Organize everyone into groupsGive everyone a list of potential implementation conceptsAsk each group to work together to organize the concepts
into three categories: Highest Importance Moderate Importance Lowest Importance
Two rulesUp to 5 concepts in the Highest Importance categoryCan add one additional concept in the Highest Importance
category
Potential Implementation Concepts
What will happen next?The rankings will appear in the final Going Places report to
indicate which potential concepts are considered most important
MVRPC staff will use this ranking of the concepts when devising a list of potential implementation policies
Potential Implementation Concepts
How we derived them:Drew from several sources: Think Cards Mind Maps Comments from the online voting Comments from the mail survey
Selected concepts that best represented some of the most popular and important comments made by participants
Potential Implementation Concepts
Encourage the rehabilitation and/or repurposing of existing structures
Focus on the maintenance of existing infrastructure
Locate any new development in areas with existing infrastructure
Revive the Region’s older communities
Preserve prime farmland and support agricultural enterprise
Improve the quality of educational opportunities throughout the Region
Foster a sense of connection and cooperation between the Region’s communities
Increase the number and quality of transportation options
Encourage development around the
Region’s assets Encourage the rehabilitation/reuse of
vacant industrial sites Encourage energy-efficient building
practices and the retrofitting of existing structures for energy efficiency
Use land in a way that builds a sense of community
Maintain and expand the Region’s parks, natural areas, and recreational amenities
Discourage greenfield development Encourage the development of quality,
realistic affordable housing throughout the Region
Revive the Region’s core city – the City of Dayton
Next Steps
Develop and evaluate a preferred scenario
Evaluate best practice implementation concepts
Develop the 2040 Regional Growth Framework
Consensus Building
Public Open Houses
Presentation and Input Solicitation
Endorsement and Formal Review
Approval from MVRPC Board of Directors
Strong Leadership and Support are Critical
Incorporate sound technical analysis of good quality data throughout the process
Facilitate meaningful discussions and build a regional consensus
Seek extensive regional stakeholder engagement so that the outcome reflects a collective vision of regional stakeholders
Build a partnership with local jurisdictions and work closely with their staff
Foster strong support from regional leaders in both public and private sectors
Better integrate the Going Places planning process into MVRPC’s current regional transportation planning process
Thank You