GOHFN WOLF P~. - Connecticut Communications Corporation is also the property owner. ... ~~\ ~i~P (E)...

24
GOHFN WOLF _P~._ ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE D. KOHLER PLEASE REPLY TO: BC'ICIQ@~JOC't WRITER~s ~iRECT ~iA~: (203) 337-4157 E-Mail Address: [email protected] Attorney Melanie Bachman Acting Executive Director Connecticut Siting Council Ten Franklin Square New Britain, CT 06051 April 23, 2014 Re: Notice of Exempt Modification SBA Communications Corporation/T-Mobile co-location Site ID CT11505A 349R Mountain Street, Willimantic, Connecticut Dear Attorney Bachman: This office represents T -Mobile Northeast LLC ("T -Mobile") and has been retained to file exempt modification filings with the Connecticut Siting Council on its behalf. In this case, SBA Communications Corporation owns the existing self -supported communications tower and related facility located at 349R Mountain Street, Willimantic, Connecticut (Latitude: 41.38932982 Longitude: -72.1713843). T -Mobile intends to replace six antennas and related equipment at this existing telecommunications facility in Willimantic ("Willimantic Facility"). Please accept this letter as notification, pursuant to R.C.S.A. § 16-50j- 73, of construction which constitutes an exempt modification pursuant to R.C.S.A. § 16 -50j - 72(b)(2). In accordance with R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-73, a copy of this letter is being sent to the Mayor, Earnest Eldridge. SBA Communications Corporation is also the property owner. The existing Willimantic Facility consists of a 196 foot tall self -supported tower.' T - Mobile plans to replace six antennas and six TMAs (tower mounted amplifiers) with six antennas and three TMAs at a centerline of 169 feet. (See the plans revised to March 28, 2014 attached hereto as Exhibit A). T -Mobile will also install a new equipment cabinet on the existing concrete pad, install fiber cable, reuse some coax cable and remove other coax cable. The existing Willimantic Facility is structurally capable of supporting T -Mobile's proposed modifications, as indicated in the structural analysis dated March 26, 2014 and attached hereto as Exhibit B. 1 While the online docket for the Connecticut Siting Council does not provide a docket or petition number for the approval of this structure, it does reference this structure in connection with notices of intent captioned EM-T- MOBILE-163-110714 and EM-T -MOBILE-163-090227. 1115 BROAD STREET IS$ DEER HILL AVENUE 32O POST ROAD WEST 6S7 ORANGE CENTER ROAD P.O. BOX 1821 DANBURY, CT 06810 WESTPORT, CI S O68HO ORANGE, CI' 06477 BRIDGEPORT, CT 06601-1821 ~L: (203) ~922~~1 TeL: (203) 222-1031 'I~t: (203) 298-4066 'ILL: (203) 368-0211 Fax: (203) 791-8149 Fax: (203) 227-1373 Fax: (203) 298 068 Fnx: (203) 3949901

Transcript of GOHFN WOLF P~. - Connecticut Communications Corporation is also the property owner. ... ~~\ ~i~P (E)...

GOHFNWOLF_P~._ATTORNEYS AT LAW JULIE D. KOHLER

PLEASE REPLY TO: BC'ICIQ@~JOC't

WRITER~s ~iRECT ~iA~: (203) 337-4157E-Mail Address: [email protected]

Attorney Melanie BachmanActing Executive DirectorConnecticut Siting CouncilTen Franklin SquareNew Britain, CT 06051

April 23, 2014

Re: Notice of Exempt ModificationSBA Communications Corporation/T-Mobile co-locationSite ID CT11505A349R Mountain Street, Willimantic, Connecticut

Dear Attorney Bachman:

This office represents T-Mobile Northeast LLC ("T-Mobile") and has been retained tofile exempt modification filings with the Connecticut Siting Council on its behalf.

In this case, SBA Communications Corporation owns the existing self-supportedcommunications tower and related facility located at 349R Mountain Street, Willimantic,Connecticut (Latitude: 41.38932982 Longitude: -72.1713843). T-Mobile intends to replace sixantennas and related equipment at this existing telecommunications facility in Willimantic("Willimantic Facility"). Please accept this letter as notification, pursuant to R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-73, of construction which constitutes an exempt modification pursuant to R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-72(b)(2). In accordance with R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-73, a copy of this letter is being sent to theMayor, Earnest Eldridge. SBA Communications Corporation is also the property owner.

The existing Willimantic Facility consists of a 196 foot tall self-supported tower.' T-Mobile plans to replace six antennas and six TMAs (tower mounted amplifiers) with sixantennas and three TMAs at a centerline of 169 feet. (See the plans revised to March 28,2014 attached hereto as Exhibit A). T-Mobile will also install a new equipment cabinet on theexisting concrete pad, install fiber cable, reuse some coax cable and remove other coax cable.The existing Willimantic Facility is structurally capable of supporting T-Mobile's proposedmodifications, as indicated in the structural analysis dated March 26, 2014 and attachedhereto as Exhibit B.

1 While the online docket for the Connecticut Siting Council does not provide a docket or petition number for theapproval of this structure, it does reference this structure in connection with notices of intent captioned EM-T-MOBILE-163-110714 and EM-T-MOBILE-163-090227.

1115 BROAD STREET IS$ DEER HILL AVENUE 32O POST ROAD WEST 6S7 ORANGE CENTER ROAD

P.O. BOX 1821 DANBURY, CT 06810 WESTPORT, CIS O68HO ORANGE, CI' 06477BRIDGEPORT, CT 06601-1821 ~L: (203) ~922~~1 TeL: (203) 222-1031 'I~t: (203) 298-4066

'ILL: (203) 368-0211 Fax: (203) 791-8149 Fax: (203) 227-1373 Fax: (203) 298 068Fnx: (203) 3949901

COH~NWOLF_,.~:_♦TTORNEI'9 AT LAl\'

April 23, 2014Site ID CT11505APage 2

The planned modifications to the Willimantic Facility fall squarely within those activities

explicitly provided for in R.C.S.A. § 16-50j-72(b)(2).

1 . The proposed modification will not increase the height of the tower. T-Mobile's

replacement antennas will be installed at a centerline of 169 feet, merely replacing existingantennas located at the same 169 foot elevation. The enclosed tower drawing confirms that

the proposed modification will not increase the height of the tower.

2 . The proposed modifications will not require an extension of the site boundaries.

T-Mobile's equipment will be located entirely within the existing compound and leased area as

shown on Pages 1 of Exhibit A.

3 . The proposed modification to the Willimantic Facility will not increase the noiselevels at the existing facility by six decibels or more.

4 . The operation of the replacement antennas will not increase the total radiofrequency (RF) power density, measured at the base of the tower, to a level at or above the

applicable standard. According to a Radio Frequency Emissions Analysis Report prepared by

EBI dated April 3, 2014, T-Mobile's operations would add 0.143% of the FCC Standard.Therefore, the calculated "worst case" power density for the planned combined operation at

the site including all of the proposed antennas would be 26.170% of the FCC Standard ascalculated for a mixed frequency site as evidenced by the engineering exhibit attached hereto

as Exhibit C.

For the foregoing reasons, T-Mobile respectfully submits that the proposed replacementantennas and equipment at the Willimantic Facility constitutes an exempt modification underR.C.S.A. § 16-50j-72(b)(2). Upon acknowledgement by the Council of this proposed exemptmodification, T-Mobile shall commence construction approximately sixty days from the date ofthe Council's notice of acknowledgement.

Sincere)

~ l

Jul D. Kohler, Esq.

cc: Town of Windham (Willimantic), Mayor Earnest EldridgeSBA Communications CorporationNortheast Site Solutions, Sheldon J. Freincle

PROJECTLOCATION

(E) ACCESSDRI`✓EV•1t;Y

/~

v~~~

'~~

T—MOBILE 10'X20' LEASE AREA200 SQFT AGGREGATE

Y~~,~

`, .

KEY PLANN.T.S.

~, ti,,s ~,,

i' ~ ,ter~~ x

/x~

/"~~x~x/x

~* a r

\\\ (~) caFVE~-~

(-CO~~APOUiVD

t\

F

f

\\ \ jj'{FLT~R~`✓ ~~~~~ 0

J ~i~~~~\ ~i~P

(E) T—MOBILE 10'X13' CONCRETE PAD

(P) T—MOBILE EQUIPMENTSEE PAGE 4

(P) T—MOBILE ANTENNAS AND TMAsSEE PAGE 3

(E) i9s' HicH ~a7Tic~- ro~n~~r

f

~\ ALPHA q~jM~~~*+ so

f

,~1̀ `.~, +.

L12

v~io~ caTE

(Ej i2' UJI~E GP.TE

(Ej E' HIGH FEi~!C-

ALL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARESUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY LESSEE/LICENSEE'SSTRUCTURAL & RF ENGINEERS. LOCATIONS OF POWER &TELEPHONE FACILITIES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BYUTILITY COMPANIES.

SITE PLAN 1N.r.s. LE-1

(E} 6' HIGH FENC_

(CONFIGURATION

~~

SUBMITTALS LEASE EXHIBIT NORTHEAST SITE SOLUTIONSLE REV A 02.18.14 SITE NUMBER: 54 MAIN STREET, UNff 3LE REV 0 02. ~ a.~ 4 T LANTI S CT11505ALE REV 1 03.28.14 ~

STU X508) 434- ~

01566

GROUP SffE NAME:

134o Centre Street WILLIMANTIC - VERIZON FOR

Suite 212 srre aooAess: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC

Newton, MA 02459 349R MOUNTAIN STREET 35 GRIFFIN ROAD SOUTH

Office: 617-965-0789 WILLIMANTIC, CT 06226 BLOOMFIELD, CToso02OFFICE: (860) 692-7100

Fax: 617-213-5056 FAX: (860) 692-7159

DRAWN BY: EB CHECKED BY:SM PAGE1 OF3

(P) GSM/UMTS QUAD POLE ANTENNATO REPLACE(E) GSM/GSM QUAD POLE ANTENNA(iYP 1/SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3)

(P) dd84 TMAs(TYP 1/SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3)(E) ddB2 TAWTO BE REMOVED(TYP 2/SECTOR, TOTAL OF 6)

TOP OF !Ej LF,TTI~E TO'A/ER

RAD CEN1-P, OF (Ej F,I~iIEi`"~F,S F{~,,ELE'd.= 180± (AGLj `~

RAD CENTER OF (P) T—MOBILE ANTENNASF~V.= 169' CAGC}

~\ ~— (P) LTE QUAD POLE ANTENNA~\ TO REPLACE

~\ (E) GSM/GSM QUAD POLE ANTENNA~\ (1YP 1/SECTOR, TOTAL OF 3)

~~ (E) Gl~i~l __

~ (tj OIJ~idl & TELc~1VAVE PJ~TEI~It~IA ~

ELEV.= 140'± (ACL)

(P) (1) 1-5/8" FlBER CABLE(E) (12) 1-5/8' COAX CABLES TO REMAIN(~ (4) 1-5/8' COAX CABLES TO BE REMOVED(E) (1) 1/4' COAX CABLE TO 8E REMOVED

(E; i 95' HIGH IATTIrE i O~IJER

(P) (1) 3106 CABINET ON(E) CONC. PAD

(E) ~2) GSivi ~?200D ~P.Bi:`J=TTO BE TURi~IED GFr P.IJG REPAP.iI~

ELEVATIONN.T.S. ~~Q~

SUBMITTALS LEASE EXHIBIT NORTHEAST SITE SOLUTIONSLE REV A 02.18.14 SfTE NUMBER: 54 MAIN STREET, UNff 3LE REV 0 02.18.14 TLANTIS CT11505A STURBRIDGE, MA 01566

LE REV 1 03.28.14

G R O U P (508)434-5237

SRE NAME:

WILLIMANTIC - VERIZON FOR

13ao Centre Street T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLCSURe Zl Z SITE ADDRESS:

Newton, MA 02459 349R MOUNTAIN STREET 35 GRIFFIN ROAD SOUTH

WILLIMANTIC, CT 06226 BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002

Office: 617-965-0789 OFFICE: (860) 692-7100

Fvc: 617-213-5056 FAX: (860) 692-7159

DRAWN 8Y: EB CHECKED BY:SM PAGE20F3

i

./~,

GSM/GSMQUAD POLE

(1) dd82 T~

~~/`1~P~~~

0~P

GSM/GSMQUAD POLE

(1) ddB2 TMA

LEl AMENBHA AZIMIliry 60•

Muunu rULE

(i) ddB2 TMA

EXISTING ANTENNA CONFIGURATION

~~~a~ ire

GSM/UMTS ~~`~ QUAD POLEouno Pow 3~~

LTEQUAD P(

2

~~

P'0`~'

GSM/UMTSQUAD POLE

(1) ddB4 TMA

4LP~ ANjENNAS—~ AZIMUp~ Bo••

(1) dd84 TMA V ~G QUAD POLE

CONFIGURATION

PROPOSED ANTENNA CONFIGURATION 2C

SUBMITTALS LEASE EXHIBIT NORTHEAST SITE SOLUTIONSLE REV A 02.18.14 SffE NUMBER: 54 MAIN STREET, UNIT 3LE REV 0 02.18.14 TLANTIS CT11505A STURBRIDGE, MA 01566LE REV 1 03.28.14 ~ (508) 434-5237

GROUP SffE NAME:

13ao Centre Street WILLIMANTIC - VERIZON FOA

Suite 272 sirenooaess: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC

Newton, MA 02459 349R MOUNTAIN STREET 35 GRIFFIN ROAD SOUTH

Office: 617.965-0789 WILLIMANTIC, CT 06226 BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002OFFICE: (860) 692-7100

Fax: 617-213-5056 FAx: (860) 692-~t59

DRAWN BY: EB CHECKED BY:SM PAGE30F4

~~ GSM~GSM

GSM/GSM 3~~y QUAD POLE

QUAD POLE ~ ~ (1) ddB2 TMA

T—MOBILE 10'X20' LEASE AREA200 SQFT AGGREGATE

(E) T—MOBILE 10'X13' CONCRETE PAD

(E (2j GSi,4 —~1zBD0 CABINET

(E) (16) —5~g~.(E) (1) 1/4"COAX CABLE OluICE BRIDGE

(E) FPC CABINET -

(Ej I~fETER

~------------------ ----- --~ r----------------------------s i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~~ i (E) (2) ssi✓~ ~ i~ ~ S~20D0 CABINS ~ ~~ ~ TO 6E 7UKNEC ~ ~1 ~ OFF PND ~"EPdAIN ~ ~

r.

1 ~i ~ ,~ ~ — -- -~1

`' ----I ! i ~ -

\~1. i ~ I I f ~/

~~,~ _ i ~,_ _; ~ ~ T~_I 'i i - ; L~ _

i______'__~ ~__'___ ~ 8

(P) (1) 3106 CABINET ON ~(E) CONC. PAD Z ~

i 1 -(P) (1) 1-5/8' FlBER LINE ~ + `"(E) (12) 1-5/8" COAX CABLESiTO REMNN ~ j ~

TO BE~REMO~VED COAX CABLES

TO BED REMOVE ~ ~8~ ~ ~ ~ ~

(Ej PPC ChBIIdE7

Y1

j (Ej METER

1 ~ ~~ ~ 1

EXISTING EQUIPMENT PLAN

i -1 11 ~ 11 ~ t

L"..""" 'F~-_________~__J

~~ —

2~S"B'"'n~S LEASE EXHIBIT

LE REV A 02.18.14 NORTHEAST SITE SOLUTIONS

SffE NUMBER: 54 MAIN STREET, UNff 3LE REV 0 02.18.14 TLANTIS CT11505A STURBRIDGE, MA 01566LE REV 1 03.28.14 ~ (508) 434-5237

GROUP SRE NAME:

1340 Centre Street WILLIMANTIC - VERIZON FOR

Suite 212 sirenooaess: T-MOBILE NORTHEAST, LLC

Newton, MA 02459 349R MOUNTAIN STREET 35 GRIFFIN ROAD SOUTH

Office: 617-965-0789 WILLIMANTIC, CT 06226 BLOOMFIELD, CT osoo2oFFice: ~eso~ sszaioo

1 Fax: 617-213-5056 FAX: (860) 692-7159

DRAWN 8Y: EB CHECKED BY:SM PAGE40F4

FDH

FDH Engineering, Inc., 6521 Meridien Drive Raleigh, NC 27616, Ph. 919.755.1012

Structural Analysis forSBA Network Services, Inc.

196' Self-Support Tower

SBA Site Name: Mountain Street — Twr #2SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02T-Mobile Site ID: CT11505A

FDH Project Number 1424YD1400

Analysis ResultsTower Components 76.0% Sufficient

Foundation 72.4% Sufficient

Prepared By: Reviewed By:

-~ ~~-~~

Jarel Duncan, EI Bradley R. Newman, PE

Project Engineer Senior Project EngineerCT PE License No. 29630

FDH Engineering, Inc. ~~~`~ OF R NNF~r.,~6521 Meritlien Drive ~r ~'~ H mac+Raleigh, NC 27616 ; o,(919) 755-1012 _ * [email protected]

"~ 9900

~;~~.o ~~~ENS~ ~~F d

~~'~~;~S~ONA~ ~ ~;;~ I) y

March 26, 2014

Prepared pursuant to T/A/EIA-222-F Structural Standards for Steel Antenna lowers and Antenna Supporting Structures and 2005 Connecticut State Building Code

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 07/05/11

Structural Malysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26.2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVESUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................................3

Conclusions............................................................................................................................................................................3

Recommendation...................................................................................................................................................................3

APPURTENANCE LISTING .......................................................................................................................................................4

RESULTS...................................................................................................................................................................................5

GENERAL COMMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................6

LIMITATIONS.............................................................................................................................................................................6

APPENDIX .................................................................................................................................................................................7

Document No, ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06117/112

Structural Analysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26, 2014

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

At the request of SBA Network Services, Inc., FDH Engineering, Inc. performed a structural analysis of the existing self-supported tower located in Windham, CT to determine whether the tower is structurally adequate to support both the existingand proposed loads pursuant to the Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures,TIA/EIA-222-F and 2005 Connecticut State Building Code (CSBC). Information pertaining to the existing/proposed antennaloading, current tower geometry, the member sizes, and foundation dimensions was obtained from:

❑ Rohn Industries, Inc (Eng. File No. 49204TT) original design drawings dated September 27, 2001❑ Rohn Industries, Inc (Eng. File No. 49204TT) Mat Foundation Detail dated August 31, 2001❑ FDH Engineering, Inc. (Job No. 1301611800) TIA Inspection Report dated May 3, 2013❑ SBA Network Services, Inc

The basic design wind speed per the TIA/EIA-222-F standards and 2005 CSBC is 85 mph without ice and 38 mph with 1"radial ice. Ice is considered to increase in thickness with height.

Conclusions

With the existing and proposed antennas from T-Mobile in place at 175 ft, the tower meets the requirements of the TIA/EIA-222-F standards and 2005 CSBC provided the Recommendations listed below are satisfied. Furthermore, provided thefoundation was designed and constructed to support the original design reactions (see Rohn File No. 49204TT), thefoundation should have the necessary capacity to support both the proposed and existing loading. For a more detaileddescription of the analysis of the tower, see the Results section of this report.

Our structural analysis has been performed assuming all information provided to FDH Engineering, Inc. is accurate (i.e,, thesteel data, tower layout, existing antenna loading, and proposed antenna loading) and that the tower has been properlyerected and maintained per the original design drawings.

Recommendations

To ensure the requirements of the TIA/EIA-222-F standards and 2005 CSBC are met with the existing and proposed loadingin place, we have the following recommendations:

1. Coax lines must be installed as shown in Figure 1.2. The proposed TMAs should be installed directly behind the proposed panel antennas.

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06/17/11

Structural Malysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26, 2014

APPURTENANCE LISTING

The proposed and existing antennas with their corresponding cables/coax lines are shown in Table 1, If the acfual layoutdetermined in the field deviates from fhe layout, FDH Engineering, Inc. should be contacted to perform a revised analysis.

Table 1 -Appurtenance Loading

Existing Loading:

..

(3) Antel BXA~OOSOI4CF(3) Antel BXA-70063/6CF

(3) Antel BXA-171085-8BF (12)1-5/8"180 (3) Antel BXA-171063~CF (1)1-518" Fiber

Verizon 180 (3)10' T-Frames(3) Alcatel lucent RRH2X40-AWS RRHs(6) RFS FD9R600412C-3L Diplexers

1 RFS DB-T1-6Z-8A6-OZ Distribution Box(7)AndrewADFD1820-9090B-R2DM (16)1-518"

169 (3) RFS Twin PCS TMAs (1)114" T-Mobile 168 (3)10' T-Frames

3 RFS Twin AWS TMAs162 1 RFS PD1142-2B Omni 1 718" 158 1 1.5' Standoff

157 1 RFS 458-2N Omni 1 718" Connecticut 152 1 4' Standoff

1 Telewave ANT450D6-9 Di le 1 718" Light and 151 1 4' Standoff

140 1 RFS 220-7N Omni Power

139 1 RFS PD1142-2B Omni (3) 718" Company 130 (3) 8' Standoffs

135 1 Telewave ANT450D6-9 Di ole

Proposed Loading:

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06117/11

Structural Analysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26, 2014

RESULTS

The following yield strength of steel for individual members was used for analysis:

Table 2 -Material Strength

Member Type Yield Strength

-~ ~

Table 3 displays the summary of the ratio (as a percentage) of force in the member to their capacities. Values greater than100% indicate locations where the maximum force in the member exceeds its capacity. Note: Capacities up to 100% areconsidered acceptable. Table 4 displays the maximum foundation reactions.

If the assumptions outlined in this report differ from actual field conditions, FDH Engineering, Inc. should be contacted toperform a revised analysis. Furthermore, as no information pertaining to the allowable twist and sway requirements for theexisting or proposed appurtenances was provided, deflection and rotation were not taken into consideration when performingthis analysis.

See the Appendix for detailed modeling information

Table 3 -Summary of Working Percentage of Structural Components

~. - .~..-

T1 198.475 -190.35 Leg ROHN 3 STD 1.4 Pass

Diagonal L1 314x1 314x3/16 4 5 (b) Pass

Top Girt L1 3/4x1 314x3/16 1.3 Pass

T2 190.35 -170.204 Leg ROHN 3 STD 20.1 Pass

Diagonal L2x2x114 187 Pass32.5 (b)

T3 170.204 -162.038 Leg ROHN 3 STD 37.9 Pass

Diagonal L2x2x114 284 Pass48.6 (b)

T4 162.038 -141.871 Leg ROHN 3 EH 60.2 Pass

Diagonal L2x2x3/16 61.5

Pass67.6 (b)

Top Girt L1 314x1 3/4x3/16 2.2 Pass

T5 141.871-121.683 Leg ROHN 4 EH 61.5 Pass

Diagonal L2112x21/2x114 470 Pass58.9 (b)

T6 121.683 -101.475 Leg ROHN 5 EH 54.3 Pass

Diagonal L2112x21/2x1/4 64.4 Pass

77 101.475 - 81.2668 Leg ROHN 6 EHS 58.9 Pass

Diagonal L3x3x1/4 53.3 Pass

T8 81.2668 - 60.996 Leg ROHN 6 EH 62.1 Pass

Diagonal L3 112x3 1/2x114 54.5

Pass55.9 (b)

Tg 60.996 -40.663 Leg ROHN 8 EHS 57.2 Pass

Diagonal L31/2x31/2x114 72.3 Pass

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06/17/11

Structural Malysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26.2014

T10 ~ 40.663 - 20.33 ~ Leq ~ ROHN 8 EHS ~ 65.0 ~ Pass

Diagonal L4x4x114 67 ~ ~b~ Pass

T11 20.33 -0 Leg ROHN 8 EH 55.6 Pass

Diaconal L4x4x1/4 76.0 Pass

'Capacities include a 1/3 allowable stress increase for wind per

GENERAL COMMENTS

This engineering analysis is based upon the theoretical capacity of the structure. It is not a condition assessment of the

tower and its foundation. It is the responsibility of SBA Network Services, Inc. to verify that the tower modeled and analyzed

is the correct structure (with accurate antenna loading information) modeled, If there are substantial modifications to be

made or the assumptions made in this analysis are not accurate, FDH Engineering, Inc. should be notified immediately to

perform a revised analysis.

LIMITATIONS

All opinions and conclusions are considered accurate to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty based upon theevidence available at the time of this report. All opinions and conclusions are subject to revision based upon receipt of new

or additional/updated information. All services are provided exercising a level of care and diligence equivalent to the

standard and care of our profession. No other warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, is offered. Our services areconfidential in nature and we will not release this report to any other party without the clients consent. The use of thisengineering work is limited to the express purpose for which it was commissioned and it may not be reused, copied, or

distributed for any other purpose without the written consent of FDH Engineering, Inc.

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06/17111

Table 4 -Maximum Base Reactions

Structural Analysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26, 2014

APPENDIX

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06/17/11

Structural Malysis ReportSBA Network Services, Inc.SBA Site ID: CT06462-A-02

March 26, 2014

LEG (328°)

~~2) ~(4) 1

(1) 1-5/8" PROPFO

(6) 7/S" EXISTING COAXFOR CONNECTICUT LIGHT AND POWER

TO 130', 151', 152', AND 158'

O =EXISTING=PROPOSED= TO BE REMOVED

Figure 1—Coax Layout

(12) 1-5/8" EXISTING COAX(1) 1-5/8" EXISTING FIBER CABLEFOR VERIZON TO 180'

SAFETY CLIMB

Document No. ENG-RPT-502S Revision Date: 06117/11

a a

vO ~fj r

= pO~ `x d

S! zJ

0v~ o

~ ~x ,~ ~'w ~

Z ?S~5 o

O "+ ~ U~ ~ a

w

zxOK ~

~ oN

= J

W ~~ ~Z '°o ~

N M ~Q N

Nx pw

zkx'x ~0

v

W~o QZ Z ~O ~K ~

xN

N mf0

xw

zx ~

~ a

X

x~ NJ

sw w

mz

~ ~

N ~d N

C7 ~ Ya ~ ~ ~ S

~ (9 0 `a (7 ~ ~' tv~ a v mm m ~ a m

fA J J ❑ ❑ H lL q

i se.s n

,soae

no.zn

i s2.o n

141.9 ft

~zt~ n

101_5 K

81.3 ft

61.0 ft

40.7 ft

20.3 ft

o.o n

DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADINGTYPE ELEVATION TYPE ELEVATION

Lightning Rod 198.475 AIR 21 B4A/B2P w/Mourn Pipe 168

Antel BXA-70063l6CF w! Maunl Pipe 180 AIR 21 B4A/B2P w/Mou~rt Pipe 168

Antel BXA-70063/6CF w/Mount Pipe 180 AIR 21 B4A/B2P w/Mount Pipe 168

BXA-80080/4CF w/ Mount Pipe 180 KRY 112 144 TMA 168

BXA-80080/4CF w/ Mount Pipe 180 KRY 112 144 TMA 168

BXA-80080/4CF w/ Mount Pipe 180 KRY 112 144 TMA 168

(2) FD9R6004/2C-3L Diplexers 180 Empty Mounl Pipe 168

(2) FD9R6004/2C-3L Diplexers 180 Empty Mounl Pipe 168

(2)FD9R6004/2C-3L Diplexers 180 Empty Mounl Pipe 168

Mtel BXA-171085-BBF w/ Mount Pipe 180 (3) 10' T-Frames 168

Mtel BXA-171085-88F w/Mount Pipe 180 AIR 27 B2AlB4P w/Mount Pipe 168

Antel BXA-171085-BBF w/ Mount Pipe 180 (1) 1.5' Standoff 158

Antel BXA-171063-BCF w/Mourrt Pipe 180 RFS PD1142-2B Omni 758

Antel BXA-171063-BCF w/Mount Pipe 180 45&2N Omni 152

Antel BXA-771063-BCF w/Mount Pipe 180 (1) 4' Standoff 752

RRH2X40-AWS 180 (1) 4' Standoff 151

RRH2X40-AWS 180 ANT450D6-9 dipole 157

RRH2X40-AWS 180 RFS 220-7N Omni 130

D&T1-6Z-8A6-OZ Distribution Box 180 RFS PD1142-28 Omni 130

(3) 10' T-Frames 180 ANT450DG9 Dipole 130

Antel BXA-70063/6CF w/Mount Pipe 180 (3) 8' Standoffs 130

AIR 21 B2A/B4Pw/Mourn Pipe 168 RFS PD1142-28 Omni 130

AIR 21 B2A/B4Pw/Mount Pipe 168

SYMBOL LISTMARK SIZE MARK SIZE

A L13l4x13/4x3/16

MATERIAL STRENGTHGRADE Fy Fu GRADE Fy Fu

A572-50 50 ksi fi5 ksi A36 36 ksi 58 ksi

~ TOWER DESIGN NOTES1. Tower is located in Windham County, Connecticut.2. Tower designed fora 85 mph basic wind in accordance with the TIA/EIA-222-F Standard.3. Tower is also designed fora 38 mph basic wind with 1.00 in ice. Ice is considered to

increase in thickness with height.4. Deflections are based upon a 5o mph wind.5. TOWER RATING: 76%

MAX. CORNER REACTIONS AT BASE:DOWN: 241 KSHEAR: 26 K

UPLIFT. -204 KSHEAR: 23 K

AXIAL84 K

SHEA~ MOMENT13 K~~ ~ 1473 kip-ft

TORQUE 5 kip-ft38 mph WIND - 1.0000 in ICE

AXIAL38 K

SHEAR' ~ \ MOMENT42 K~ ̀ 4549 kip-ft

TORQUE 27 kip-ftREACTIONS - 85 mph WIND

FDHEngineering, Inc. ob Mountain Street, CTos462-A-02

~ 6521 Meridien Drive Project: ~424YD1400

R8leigh, NC 27616 ci~ern' SBA Network Services, Inc. Drawn by: Karel Duncan APP~a:

TowerMalysis PhOf1E: (919) 755-1012 code: TIA/EIA-222-F oate:03/26/14 scale: NTS

FAX: 919 755-1031 Palh: Dwg No. E-1

~EBI Consulting,a, ~ environmental ~ engineering ~ due diligence

RADIO FREQUENCY EMISSIONS ANALYSIS REPORTEVALUATION OF HUMAN EXPOSURE POTENTIAL

TO NON-IONIZING EMISSIONS

T-Mobile Existing Facility

Site ID: CT11505AWillimantic-Verizon

349R Mountain StreetWillimantic CT 06226

April 3, 2014

EBI Project Number:62142243

21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311

~E61 Consulting,,~► ~ environmental ~ engineering ~ due diligence

Apri13, 2014

T-Mobile USAAttn: Jason Overbey, RF Manager

35 Griffin Road SouthBloomfield, CT 06002

Re: Emissions Values for Site: CT11505A —Willimantic-Verizon

EBI Consulting was directed to analyze the proposed T-Mobile facility located at 349R Mountain Street,

Willimantic CT, for the purpose of determining whether the emissions from the Proposed T-Mobile

Antenna Installation located on this property are within specified federal limits.

All information used in this report was analyzed as a percentage of current Ma~cimum Permissible

Exposure (% MPE) as listed in the FCC OET Bulletin 65 Edition 97-Oland ANSI/IEEE Std C95.L The

FCC regulates Ma~cimum Permissible Exposure in units of microwatts per square centimeter (µW/cm2).

The number of µW/cm2 calculated at each sample point is called the power density. The exposure limit

for power density varies depending upon the frequencies being utilized. Wireless Carriers and Paging

Services use different frequency bands each with different exposure limits, therefore it is necessary to

report results and limits in terms of percent MPE rather than power density.

All results were compared to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) radio frequency exposure

rules, 47 CFR 1.1307(b)(1) — (b)(3), to determine compliance with the Maximum Permissible Exposure

(MPE) limits for General Population/Uncontrolled environments as defined below.

General ponulation/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be

exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made

fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore,

members of the general public would always be considered under this category when exposure is not

employment related, for example, in the case of a telecommunications tower that exposes persons in a

nearby residential area.

Public exposure to radio frequencies is regulated and enforced in units of microwatts per square

centimeter (µW/cm2). The general population exposure limit for the cellular band is 567 µW/cm2, and the

general population exposure limit for the PCS and AWS bands is 1000 µW/cm2. Because each carrier

will be using different frequency bands, and each frequency band has different exposure limits, it is

necessary to report percent of MPE rather than power density.

21 B Street ~ Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311

~EBI Consultingb, environmental ~ engineering ~ due diligence

Occupational/controlled ex op sure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a

consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully

aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. OccupationaUcontrolled

exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through

a location where exposure levels may be above general population uncontrolled limits (see below), as

long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise

control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.

Additional details can be found in FCC OET 65.

CALCULATIONS

Calculations were done for the proposed T-Mobile Wireless antenna facility located at 349R Mountain

Street, Willimantic CT, using the equipment information listed below. All calculations were performed

per the specifications under FCC OET 65. Since T-Mobile is proposing highly focused directional panel

antennas, which project most of the emitted energy out toward the horizon, the actual antenna pattern gain

value in the direction of the sample area was used. For this report the sample point is a 6 foot person

standing at the base of the tower.

For all calculations, all equipment was calculated using the following assumptions:

1) 2 GSM / LJMTS channels (1935.000 MHz to 1945.000 MHz / 1983.000 MHz to 1984.000

MHz) were considered for each sector of the proposed installation.

2) 4 UMTS / LT'E channels (2110.000 to 2120.000 MHz / 2140.000 MHz to 2145.000 MHz)

were considered for each sector of the proposed installation.

3) All radios at the proposed installation were considered to be running at full power and were

uncombined in their RF transmissions paths per carrier prescribed configuration. Per FCC

OET Bulletin No. 65 -Edition 97-01 recommendations to achieve the maximum anticipated

value at each sample point, all power levels emitting from the proposed antenna installation

are increased by a factor of 2.56 to account for possible in-phase reflections from the

surrounding environment. This is rarely the case, and if so, is never continuous.

4) For the following calculations the sample point was the top of a six foot person standing at

the base of the tower. The actual gain in this direction was used per the manufactures

supplied specifications.

5) The antenna used in this modeling is the Ericsson AIR21 for LTE, LTMTS and GSM. This is

based on feedback from the carrier with regards to anticipated antenna selection. This antenna

has a 15.6 dBd gain value at its main lobe. Actual antenna gain values were used for all

calculations as per the manufacturers specifications.

21 B Street 'Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311

EBI Consulting~ environmental ~ engineering ~ due diligence

6) The antenna mounting height centerline of the proposed antennas is 168 feet above ground

level (AGL).

7) Emissions values for additional carriers were taken from the Connecticut Siting Council

active database. Values in this database are provided by the individual carriers themselves.

All calculation were done with respect to uncontrolled /general public threshold limits.

21 B Street Burlington, MA 01II03 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781) 273.3311

5ke 1D a115o5A-WllllmantinVerizon

Si[e Addresss 349R MowGin Stree[, WIIIImanHCR06226

SRe Type Self Support Tower

Sator 3

Power FnLenm Gain

Ou[Per In diree/on Power Power

Antenna Channel Niunber al Campasffe ofsample An@nna analK~ Uble Lms Additional Density Density

Number Mrtenna Make pnoenna Model Sb[~s Frequenry Band Techndogy (Wri4) Channek Power polrR (dfi~ HelyM (k) he~M U61e 51re (dB) lnn EAY Wlue PerQ~ga

la Erlason AIN2I BOA/B2P gRive AWS-21m MHx LTE 60 2 l20 -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 48.3260p4 0.661999 0.0662096

Ib Eri¢san AIR2I BOF/B2P Not Used 0 -3.95 I60 162 Nane 0 0 0 0 O.OW00°b

2a Enasan AIP2182A/B4P ARNe P[5-195D MHz GSM /UMTS 30 2 EO -3.95 I6B 162 None 0 0 24.163022 0.33W99 0.0331096

lb Ericson AIR2I BOAJ82P Passive AWS-2100 MHi UMTS 40 2 BO -3.95 168 162 None 0 O 32217363 0.441333 0.04613°6

Senor fatal Power De~Ry Value: 0.143%

Sectar2

Pawv Anna Gain

Out Per in dfrecHan Power Power

A~nm Channel Numheraf Compmke at¢amP~e Ar~Rnm analysk Ghle lms Additional Demity Ocmlty

Numher AfM1enm Mahe A~nm Model Sbtis Frequenry Band TachndoQy (Wat6~ Channek Power paf~R ~dB~ HeiQM (ft) heyM Ubk Sis ode) !ns ENP Value Per2tKaQe

la Ehason AIP21 B9A/92P Active AWS-2100 MHz LTE 60 2 ]20 -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 48.326094 0.661999 0.066~i196

ib Eri¢san AIP21 B4A/92P Not Used 0 -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 0 0 0.00000°,6

3a Ericson NR219]A/B9P Active P6-1950 MHa GSM /UMTS 30 2 fA -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 24.163022 0.33di99 0.03310%

ib Eri¢san AIP23 B4A/92P Passive AWS-2300 MHz UMTS 40 2 90 -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 3221]363 0.041333 0.04413%

Sector total Power ~ens7ty Value: 0.193%

Sectar3

Power A~nm G~fn

Out Per In dlreRlon Power Power

Ar~nna Channel Numher of Compa~de of sample Antenna amlK~ GWe Lis pddHional Oensiry ~eRity

Number A~rte'ma Make AnEenm Mudd Stets Frequency Band TechnWopy (Water) Channak Power poi~rt (dBd) Hei`M (R) hei~M Ubk Slre (dB) l~ EAP Value Perm~ge

la Enason AIR21 B9A/B2P AQ(ve HN5-21W MHz LTE 6D 2 120 -3.95 160 162 Nane 0 0 48.326049 0.661999 O.~fifiZD°h

16 Ericsson AIR2I BOA/B2P Nat Used 0 d.95 16H 162 None 0 0 0 0 0.00000°6

2a Ericson AIA2162A/89P ARive Pf5-19`A MHx GSM/UMTS 30 3 EO d.95 168 162 None 0 0 20.1630]2 0.330999 0.03310%

ib Ericson AIR21 B9A/92P Passive AWS-210D MHz UMTS 40 2 80 -3.95 168 162 None 0 0 32217363 0.441333 0.00413%

SeRar total Power Density Value: 0.143%

SMe CamposRe MPE %

Urtiv MPE96

T-Mobile 0.430%

Verizan Wireless 9.390%

CL&P 1635Ph

TofalSke MPE% 26.170%

~E61 Consulting,a„ ~ environmental ~ engineering ~ due diligence

Summary

All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were well within the allowable limits for

general public exposure to RF Emissions.

The anticipated Maximum Composite contributions from the T-Mobile facility are 0.143% (0.430%

from each sector) of the allowable FCC established general public limit considering all three sectors

simultaneously sampled at the ground level.

The anticipated composite MPE value for this site assuming all carriers present is 26.170% of the

allowable FCC established general public limit sampled at the ground level. This is based upon values

listed in the Connecticut Siting Council database for e~sting carrier emissions.

FCC guidelines state that if a site is found to be out of compliance (over allowable thresholds), that

carriers over a 5%contribution to the composite value will require measures to bring the site into

compliance. For this facility, the composite values calculated were well within the allowable 100%

threshold standard per the federal government.

Scott Heffernan

RF Engineering Director

EBI Consulting

21 B Street

Burlington, MA 01803

21 B Street 'Burlington, MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273.2500 Fax: (781j 273.3311