Goethe and Music3
-
Upload
oemer-yusuf-topcu -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Goethe and Music3
7/21/2019 Goethe and Music3
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/goethe-and-music3 1/3
Goethe and MusicAuthor(s): Mosco CarnerSource: The Musical Times, Vol. 97, No. 1356 (Feb., 1956), pp. 72-73Published by: Musical Times Publications Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/938018 .
Accessed: 29/10/2014 15:37
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Musical Times Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Musical Times.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 160.75.2.183 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:37:04 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
7/21/2019 Goethe and Music3
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/goethe-and-music3 2/3
THE
MUSICAL TIMES
Goethe
nd
Music
By
MOSCO CARNER
GOETHE
(like
Shakespeare)
s
one of
those
rarepoets whomPolyhymnia as almostas
much
ight
o claimfor
herself s has her ister
muse
Euterpe.
Like another Pied
Piper,
Goethe
cast a
magic spell
upon
a
long
train f
composers,
attracting y
the iren all of his
verses
ome of
the
greatest.
He
was indeed the musician's
poet
par
excellence.
It
would
be
interesting,
or
xample,
o
speculate
on
the course the
Lied
would have taken
from
Schubert o
Hugo
Wolf,
had Goethe never
existed.)
Yet
what was Goethe's
own attitude
towards
n art
that
owes so much to the
nspiring
force
of
his
poetry
nd
plays?
And
equally
im-
portant,
was
Goethe,
whose
yrical enius uivered
and
glowed
with
nner
music,
musical
n the sense
in
which
we
comprehend
he term? The recent
publication of a booklet examiningGoethe's
relation to
Bach*
provides
convenient
ccasion
to
expatiate
n these
questions
n a
general
way.
After
reading
his famous
conversationswith
Eckermann
nd
ploughing
hrough
he
voluminous
yet
rather
ull
correspondence
hat
passed
between
him
and his
musicalmentor
elter,
ne
is left
n
no
doubt
that
Goethe's
nterestn music
nd its
prob-
lems
was
both sincere nd
profound.
Yet there
s
nothing
n
all these
writings
o show
that
his
interest,
ersistent
nd
searching hough
t
was,
was
prompted
y
more than
a
purely
ntellectual
curiosity.
We cannot resist
he
mpression
hat n
his
approach
o
music
Goethe vinced
he
mind f a
scientificnquirer ather han thatof an intuitiveartist. He seemedto
perceive
music,
notso much
as the
product
of the
creative
magination
ut as
a
fascinating
manifestation f natural
aws
in the
world of
organized
ound.
It
almost became
for
him
a
subject
of
natural
cience.
In his
unfinished
'Tonlehre'
(a
pendant
o his better-known
Theory
of
the
Colours')
he
sought
o
analyse
music
imply
as
a
natural
phenomenon,
ttempting
o
probe
into
the immanent aws which
he assumed
must
underlie
he
genesis
of ntervals
nd chords.
Sim-
ilarly,
n his
letters o
Zelter there
s
a
good
deal
about
the critical nterval
of
the third
and the
enigmatic
ontrast f mood
produced
by
ts
major
and
minor
mode. Such
inquiries
nd
speculations
bearwitness o an impulseto penetrate he secret
of
the musical art
from
predominantly
ational
angle.
As
he
said to
Eckermann,
'It
is
more
through reflection,
nd thus
in
a more
general
manner,
han
through
njoyment,
hat
approach
music
. And to Zelterhe
frankly
onfessed
hat n
his
endeavour
o
find
rational, ogical
explanation
for
whathe
enjoyed
n
music,
he
was
missing
third
of
life's
pleasure.
The crux of
the matter
s
that
Goethe,
so
uniquely
endowed
with
ntuition nd
perception
n other
pheres,
acked
that
mysterious
organ
which nables ts
owner
o
transform
isten-
ing
nto
musical
xperience-that
s,
to obtain
that
enrichmentfhis
aesthetic
elfwhich
nly
he
rtof
music
can
provide
and
in the last
analysis
defies
verbaldefinitions.To put t morebluntly, oethe
was
intrinsically
nmusical.
*
'Goethes
Verhiltnis
zu
Bach', by
Friedrich Smend. Carl
Merseburger,
Berlin.
There
was, moreover,
curious
suspicion,
ven
malaise, n his attitude o music. Of all thearts,
music was the one that
appeared
to
Goethe
to
possess
in the
highest
degree
a
quality
which
he
called das
Diimonische,
nd 'the
demonic',
he
revealingly
old
Eckermann,
is
not
in
my
nature
though
am
subject
to its influence'. To this
Olympian serenely
urveying
he
world from
his
little
Weimar
hrone,
musicwas themost rrational
of
the
arts,
unsettling,
isturbing,
ven
dangerous
in
its
general
ffect-which
was
perhaps
the
chief
reason
why,
for
all his
admiration,
he failed to
come
to
termswith
hemusicof
Beethoven,
o
him
a
musician
possessed by
demons
.
And
if he
rejected
Schubert's
settings
f
his
verses,
t was
partly
because
they
struckhim as too
romantic,
which n Goethe's anguagesignifiedhe rruption
into
classical art
of the
purely
emotional,
.e.
of
irrational,
nstinctive orces.
(In
this context
t is
perhaps
worth
recalling
hat Thomas Mann held
similar
views
on
the
power
of
music,
going
even
furtherhanGoethe
by ascribing
o
t
an
insidiously
disruptive,
athological
quality.
Thus the
com-
poser-hero
of his
great symbolical
novel 'Dr.
Faustus ends in madness
and in
a
lesser-known
story, Walsungenblut',
t
is
a
performance
f
'
Walkiire'
that
finally
destroys
he last
barrier
which
had
so far
prevented
brother
nd a sister
from
orming
n incestuous
elationship.)
True,
to some extentGoethe's
viewson
music
wereconditioned ytheeighteenth-centuryation-alists who believed
firmly
nd
uncompromisingly
in
the
superiority
f
pure
reason over the
emotions
and
sense-perceptions.
Had
not Descartes con-
tendedthat there
re
elementary
priori
oncepts
from
which
he
whole
of
knowledge
an
be
deduced
mathematically?
As for
music,
had not Leibniz
defined
t as 'an unconsciousmathematical
rob-
lem
of the soul'?
Goethe,
who
at one
stage
of his
development
ad come
under
Leibniz's
influence,
seems to
echo
the dictum
f the German
philoso-
pher
when he once likened
some Bach
fugues
'to illuminated mathematical
problems
whose
themes are
so
simple though they
produce
such
extraordinary oetic
results'.
It is
certainly
most
remarkable hatGoethe,once thestormy etrel f
romanticism
n
German
literature
nd
a
close
witnessof
the
rise
of romantic
music,
should
in
later
years
have become
a
rigid
rationalist
who
would concede
a
piece
of music
raison
'etre
only
in
so far s
it
proved
susceptible
f
clear,
logical
exegesis.
To be
comprehensible
nd
have
meaning,
he would
postulate,
composition
hould serve
n
extra-musical
urpose
hat ould
readily
e
grasped
by
the ntellect.
He almost came
to
deny
music
a
purpose
in
itself,
nd, hence,
an autonomous
status.
The
principle
of Art
for
Art's
Sake
he
would no doubt
have
considered
not
only
ncom-
prehensible
ut alien to
the
very
nature
of
music
as he saw it. This
s a
point
of view
represented
n
our timeby the Soviet aestheticians, hose doc-
trines re
fundamentally
dentical
with
ighteenth-
century
ationalist
esthetics
hough
hey
re
now
pressed
nto
the ervice f a
political
deology.
The
purposes
Goethe wanted music to
serve were
72
February
956
This content downloaded from 160.75.2.183 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:37:04 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
7/21/2019 Goethe and Music3
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/goethe-and-music3 3/3
THE
MUSICAL TIMES
religious,
moral
and educational.
Thus,
he would
place
church
music
on
the
highest
innacle.
Even f
divorced rom
uch
ofty spirations,
music hould
provide
the
most
polished
form of
intellectual
entertainment:
it should
delight
the mind
by
beautiful
harmonious proportions, finished
craftsmanship,
nd a neat
expression
of refined
emotions.
Significantly,
e
preferred
ach, Haydn,
Mozart
and even
such
mediocrities as the
classicistic
Zelter and
Reichardt,
to
Beethoven
and
Schubert.
Given this
rationalist
ias,
it
was
inevitable hat
Goethe
should
have
derived
his
greatest leasure
from
word-inspired
music.
His
enjoyment
of
instrumental orks was
largely
onfined o such
as
would,
by
virtue
of
an
overtly rogrammatic
character,
uggest
o
his mind
something angible
and
capable
of
verbal
description.
One
of his
favourite
ieces
of
thiskind was the
young
Bach's
charming
rifle
Capriccio
sopra
la lontananza
del
suo fratellomatissimo. Yet even n suchmusic
therewas still ome
obscurity
s
to
the
exact
mean-
ing
of
this r that
passage.
No
such
difficulty
xisted
in vocal
compositions.
Here,
Goethe
felt,
he text
furnished im with a clear
pointer
to what the
composer
wanted
o
convey
o his isteners.
t
was
in
songs, ratorios,
nd
operas
hat
Goethe found
rational
equation
between
music
and
meaning,
seemingly
he sine
qua
non for his
enjoyment.
These
genres
were
free rom
he
tantalizing
lusive-
ness
which o
disconcerted
nd
baffled
im n the
higher
formsof instrumental
music.
There
is
a
scene
in his
great
novel
Wilhelm Meisters
Lehr-
und-Wanderjahre'
in
which
Goethe
makes
this
very point
through
the
'mouth
of his hero.
Wilhelmand his friendshave been listening o
an
old
harpist.
He had
played
an instrumental
piece
and now Wilhelm
sks himto
sing song:
'Give us
something
that
shall
entertainthe
spirit
and the
heart
as
well
as the
senses',
said
Wilhelm.
The instrument
hould
but
accompany
the
voice;
for
tunes
and melodies
withoutwords
and
meaning
eem
to me like butterflies
r
finely
variegated
irds,
which
hover round
us in the
air,
which
we
could wish
to catch and make
our
own;
whereas
ong
s
like
a blessed
genius
hatexalts us
towards
heaven,
and
inspires
he better
elf
n
us
to
attend
o him.'
This
brief
excerpt
alludes to
three
important
aspectsof Goethe's attitude o music: themoral
purpose
he ascribes
o
song,
his marked
preference
forvocal
music nd
the
reason
for
t,
nd
finally
is
views
on the relation between
words
(voice)
and
music,
he
eternal
one
of contention
etween
oet
and musician.
It is
this
ast
aspect
which needs
elaboration.'The instrument hould but
accompany
the
voice',
says
Wilhelm-Goethe.
In this
emphasis
on the
purely
ccompanying
unction
f music
n
a
song
the
great
poet
reveals
himself
true hild of
the
eighteenth
entury.
Like the
majority
f
con-
temporary
writers
nd
musicians,
Goethe
con-
tended
that the
principal
ask of
a
song-composer
lay
in
merely
throwing
he verses
into
slightly
sharper
elief
nd in
intensifying-yet
ithin
ery
narrow
imits-the emotional
uality
f the words.
The effect f
the words
s
such,
their
ccentuation
and
inflexion,
must
on no account
be
endangered
by
the
musical
etting.
This
aesthetic,ncidentally,
still
governs
most French
composers
n their
ong
settings nd is responsiblefor one of the chief
stylistic
ifferencesetween
he German
Lied and
the
French
melodie.)
To recreate
poem
n musical
terms-that
s,
to
set
t in such
a manner
hat
the
music will
represent
perfect
ransmutation
f the
mood
and
imagery
f
the
verses,
with
words and
setting
now
coalescing
into
a new
entity-this
Goethe considered
an
arrogant
and
intolerable
encroachment
n the
poet's
sacred
primacy.
He
thus
believed
the measure
of a successful
ong-
composer
to
lie in the
extent
o which
the latter
subserved he
poet
:
prima
e
parole
dopo
a
musica
was
the
angle
fromwhich
he
udged
the
settings
f
his own verses.
Small
wonder,
hen,
hathe should
have
lavished
uch
praise
on the
ongs
of
Reichardt
and Zelter,whowereboundbythenarrow esthet-
ics of
their
ge
and
scarcely
ver
dared
questioning
the
poet's
hegemony
over
the musician.
They
served
Goethe's deal
to
perfection.
Yet not
many
years
passed
before
the
young
Schubert,
with
a
single
stroke,
wept away
these
obsolescent
on-
ventions
when
in his
'Erlk6nig'
he raised
the
music
to the
plane
of Goethe's
great
dramatic
ballad.
It
was
like the
writing
n the
wall. But the
Sage
of Weimar
coldly ignored
t.
What
would
Goethe have
thought
of Wolf's
settings
of his
verses?
He
mightpossibly
have
approved
of
the
fastidious
declamatory
treatment
f
the
words
but
he
would
have
certainly
been
dismayed
at
Wolf's ymphoniciano.
John
Braham
1774?-1856)
By
FRANCES COLLINGWOOD
JOHN
BRAHAM,
who
died
on
17
February
hundred
years
ago,
was
a
small,
round
man,
of
Jewish
rigin
nd
appearance,
whose voice
s
said to
have
rung
ike
a
trumpet.
He held
the
centre f
the
operatic tage
n this
ountry
rom 796
till bout
1825,
lthoughhe
idnot
finally
etire ntil
four
years
before
his death.
At theheight f his careerhe had a compass of
nineteen
otes,
with
falsetto rom
''
to
a"',
and so
perfect
was his
control,
hat
t was
almost
mpos-
sible to
detect where the two
voices met.
There
were
certain critics who
considered
Braham,
particularly
owards the end of
his
career,
ittle
better han
vulgar
howman.
His use of theatrical
effects
nd
endless
cadenzas,
and
his
partiality
for
florid
passages
when these had
gone
out of
fashion,
brought
him into a certain
amount
of
disrepute.
An
amusing
example
of
the
sort
of
flourish
indulged n by this ittleman comes fromHere-
ford,
where
he was
singing
The
Bay
of
Biscay'.
As
he came
to the
words'
A sail
a
sail
he
flopped
down
on one knee to such
dramatic ffect
hat
he
disappeared
from
view
behind
the
platform
February
1956
73
This content downloaded from 160.75.2.183 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:37:04 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions