Goals, Objectives, and Simulationslaas.tc.faa.gov/documents/CAAC/CAAC 14 Project Newark.pdf ·...

Federal AviationAdministration 0

Project Newark

October 22, 20100

Project Newark:Goals, Objectives, and Simulations

Federal AviationAdministration

Presentation to:CAAC TeamOctober 22, 2010Atlantic City, New Jersey, USA

John WarburtonFAA Engineering Development ServicesNavigation Group [email protected]

1Federal AviationAdministration 1

Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Presentation Overview

• Project Newark Basics• Partners• Initial Results

• Simulations• Phase II Runway 29 Procedure Rework• Summary


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Project Newark


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Newark Project OverviewConduct an operational demonstration project using the

satellite navigation technology of Local Area Augmentation.

• Partnership: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), Continental Airlines, and Honeywell are establishing a Government Industry Partnership (GIP) with Navigation Service’s Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Program Office.

• A LAAS will be installed at Newark Airport to:• Demonstrate the improved performance and precision and

interoperability with other GNSS capabilities.• Provide data to support FAA decisions on ground equipage

and airline decisions on avionics.


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

GNSS Implementation Overview

• TAPS• 4D approaches• Time/Space merging• NGATS Environment

– Continuous descent approaches• Air Traffic Control• Closely spaced parallels• RNP• RNAV: Radius to Fix leg

Memphis Vertical Flight

Fixed Wing

• Care Flite - SAAARs• Helicopter LPVs• Transition routes• IFR infrastructure• Helipads• Public support• Bell: Public VF criteria

• Allegiant• Horizon• American

OperationsBenefitsProcedures

1. Prove capability

• Newark• Continental• ATC

LAAS• Teterboro• Vertical Flight

WAAS

• Approaches to RWY 29, RWYs 4/22 LR• Helicopter approaches, RNP

2. Employ proven capability 2. Employ proven capability• NY/NJ Airspace Initiative– Must solve pieces of puzzle simultaneously,

not just one part

GNSS Implementation

FAA Technical CenterDemo Development and

Proof of Concept forGNSS Applications

FAATC Proving Ground


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Newark Project Partner Contributions

– Procure the Honeywell SLS-4000 LAAS

– Complete Site Preparation– Install SLS-4000 System– Provide Maintenance and Support– Complete Facility Approval for Cat I

Operations

– Equip 10 B-737NG Aircraft with LAAS Avionics (STC)

– Support FAA Data Collection Activities– Apply for Special Approval for LAAS Cat I

Operations– Conduct Flight Test Operations– Support Procedure Development and

Simulation– Complete Service Approval for Cat I Operations

– Develop GLS Overlay Procedures – Provide Data Collection Equipment– Develop and Coordinate Prototype Terminal

Procedures – Collect Data and Analyze Performance– Support GBAS Facility and Service

Approval

FAA

PANYNJContinental


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Strategic Objectives

Demonstrate improved performance, precision, and interoperability with other SATNAV capabilities.

Identify and implement via ATC participation required RNAV/RNP operations to meet the performance based navigation that will support capacity and efficiency enhancements.

Incorporate ATC developed procedures and terminal applications to achieve increased capacity and efficiency.


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Newark Project Core Team• FAA Flight Standards• Aviation System Standards• FAA Eastern Region• Eastern Flight Procedures Office• Eastern Service Center• New York Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON)• Newark Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT)• Continental Airlines• Boeing• Honeywell• FAA Engineering Development Services Navigation Team• LAAS Operational Implementation Team (OIT)


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Procedure Development Phases• First phase

• Developing and implement the straight-in approaches from the FAF using deviation guidance provided to the current cockpit instrumentations

• Missed approach will be a straight ahead 4 NM runway heading with expected radar vectors

• http://aeronav.faa.gov• Second Phase

• Focus on the curved approaches to Runways 29 and 22R• The team will examine what procedures, or ideas for

procedures, and seek air traffic’s feedback on the “pros and cons” of each piece of those procedures

• Changes will be made to the procedures based on air traffic’s inputs

• Flight testing at ACY to determine technical feasibility and flyability using Terminal Area Paths (TAP)

• Continental will also fly these procedures in their LAAS- capable simulator


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

ARP

ILS

4R

EWRATGP 2000

DOOIN1700

RW292.35 NM

EWRAA(FROP)GP 823

(FAF)EWRAC

3000

EWRABGP 2328

CO

L R

-023

DOOIN3000

Bank Angle 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.6 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.9

ATIS

108.6

RNAV (RNP29) RWY 31Atlantic City APT (ACY)

Orig 060801 35°03’N-89°59’W NEWARK LIBERTY INT (EWR)

RNAV (RNP) RWY 29

CATEGORY A B C D

MISSED APPROACH: Climb to 1000 then climbing right turn to 5000 via 051° course to OROCU Int/MEM 15 DME hold

EXPERIMENTALFOR FAA

EVALUATION ONLYNOT FOR NAVIGATION

TDZ/CL Rwys 18L, 18C, 18R, 36R, 36C and 36L

HIRL All Rwys

31

13 22

4

10000 x 1806144

x 15

0X

XX

XX

XX

X XX

vv

vv

V

V

P

121

229

V

.90

V

.93V

.74 V

.167

GS 3.00°

TCH 60

1000’

NA

GND CON121.9

CLNC DEL127.85

3.00° from FAF27Gnd SpdFT / NM

60318

90 120 150 180477 626 795 954

APP CRS298°

Rwy Ldg 9000’TDZE 335’Apt Elev 341’

ATCInstructions

TH29

IAF

FAF

CATEGORYGLS DA 535 - ½

920 - 1½579 (600 - 1½)

800 - 1½ 459 (500 - 1½)

CIRCLING

535 - ½920 - 2

579 (600 - 2)Ground Speed 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155

(DEG)

Vert Speed (3.00°) 531 557 584 610 637 663 690 716 743 770 796 823

Turn Time (90º) 1:53 1:48 1:43 1:38 1:34 1:31 1:27 1:24 1:21 1:18 1:15 1:13

DescendingRight TurnDescending

left Turn

TDZE292

2 7

3000

3000

LAASChan 33885

Atlantic City APP CON

124.6 263.6

Atlantic City TOWER 120.3 239.0

2 nm

4.1 nm

4.6 nm

6 nm

61°

6 NM2 NM 4.1 NM

4.6 NM2.35 NM

2325300031RAA

31OIN31ACE

31RAC31RAB

2.35nm

31ACE

31RAC

31RAB

31OIN

31RAA

119°

310°

825

39 27.2N

74 33.8W

39 26.0N

74 30.9W

39 23.1N

74 32.4W

39 23.7N

74 34.9W39 22.9N

74 40.0W

39 18.9N

74 45.8W

RNP 29

Atlantic City RNP Overlay

Newark RWY 29


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Initial Flight Test Results


Project Newark

October 22, 2010


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Navigation Team Analysis ProductsFAA LAAS Flight Test @ ACY

Navigational Sensor Error (NSE)

Vertical NSE

VPL

nVPL

VPLI

nVPLI

TSP

I vs

LTP

NS

E(m

)

NMI from TDZN39 / RWY31 FAATC / 01-Apr-03 B / Appr#003

-1.00

-2.00

-3.00

-4.00

-5.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

-1.0

0

-2.0

0

-3.0

0

-4.0

0

-5.0

0

-6.0

0

-7.0

0

-8.0

0

-9.0

0

-10.

00

-11.

00

-12.

00

-13.

00

-14.

00

-15.

00

-16.

00

-17.

00

-18.

00

-19.

00

-20.

00

0.00

1.00

FAA TAP Project Newark Flight Test @ ACYHorizontalGLSDeviation Plot

HorizontalGLSDeviation

GLS

Dev

iatio

ns

NMI from FTPN39 / RWY13 THL / 14-Oct-08 A / MMR / Appr#004

-50.00

-100.00

-150.00

-200.00

-250.00

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

-1.0

0-2

.00

-3.0

0-4

.00

-5.0

0-6

.00

-7.0

0-8

.00

-9.0

0-1

0.00

-11.

00-1

2.00

-13.

00-1

4.00

-15.

00-1

6.00

-17.

00-1

8.00

-19.

00-2

0.00

-21.

00-2

2.00

-23.

00-2

4.00

-25.

00

0.00

1.00

FAA TAP Project Newark Flight Test @ ACYVerticalGLSDeviation Plot

VerticalGLSDeviation

GLS

Dev

iatio

ns

NMI from FTPN39 / RWY13 THL / 14-Oct-08 A / MMR / Appr#004

-30.00

-60.00

-90.00

-120.00

-150.00

0.00

30.00

60.00

90.00

120.00

150.00

-1.0

0-2

.00

-3.0

0-4

.00

-5.0

0-6

.00

-7.0

0-8

.00

-9.0

0-1

0.00

-11.

00-1

2.00

-13.

00-1

4.00

-15.

00-1

6.00

-17.

00-1

8.00

-19.

00-2

0.00

-21.

00-2

2.00

-23.

00-2

4.00

-25.

00

0.00

1.00


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Project Newark Phase II Simulation

• A two part simulation effort was identified:• The first step is to define scenario-based simulations

to evaluate the benefit of new procedure to RWY29• Fast-time capacity study• ATC input is needed to ensure that the simulation quantifies

realistic capacity improvement

• Based on the successful outcome of the first step, Human-in-the-loop testing was planned

• Evaluate tools to aid Air Traffic Control (ATC)• Determine ATC workload• Examine Missed Approach scenarios

Federal AviationAdministration 16Project Newark Phase II Quick-Look

October 2010

Phase II – Modeling and Simulation Activities

Phase II includes the conduct and analysis of a series of modeling and simulation (M&S) activities:

• Fast-time – performed to examine system performance, including benefits assessment (e.g. delay, fuel burn, time/distance flown) & analysis of capacity, safety, risk, and efficiency

• Real-time, Human-in-the-loop (HITL) – performed to examine and demonstrate an end-to-end concept at a higher fidelity. Identify and assess specific human performance issues as a result of new air traffic management (ATM) activities

M&S Activity Modeling Tool/Facility

Fast-Time Capacity Analysis – 1

Runway Delay Simulation Model (RDSIM)

Real-Time Tower Feasibility Demonstration

Airport Facilities Terminal Integration (AFTIL)

Real-Time Tower Concept Refinement Demonstration

AFTIL

Fast-Time Capacity Analysis – 2

RDSIM

Real-Time Tower Concept Validation Simulation

AFTIL

Tower-TRACON Concept Validation Simulation

NextGen Integration and Evaluation Capability (NIEC)

Presenter

Presentation Notes

* As a method for operational concept validation, community best practices suggest a complementary, iterative approach to using both fast-time and real-time simulations. * Performed in the early stages of validation to get initial assessments of potential benefits. Also helpful useful at identifying potential problem areas where real-time simulation studies are necessary * Can be conducted either before or after or simultaneously (explanation of chart) Proposed list of the M&S activities planned for Phase II; Each activity is dependent on the successful completion of its predecessor. The successive simulations will utilize and build upon the results for the preceding activities.


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Initial Simulation Activities

• Capacity Analysis Baseline• Several baseline days were selected and

analyzed• Traffic Flow, conditions, fleet mix• Data presented for April 12, 2010

• VFR day using 4R for arrivals and 4L for departures

• VFR and IFR Results are presented for completeness, conditions under which RWY29 can be used will be addressed under operational constraints

18Federal AviationAdministration

Capacity Analysis GroupFAA William J. Hughes Technical Center

18

Aircraft Mix

Air Air GeneralCarrier Taxi Aviation

768 399 24 1,19164.48% 33.50% 2.02% 100.00%

Total

1 – Heavy 8.66%2 – B757 11.32%3 – Large 79.16%4 – Small + 0.26%5 – Small-T 0.00%6 - Small-S 0.60%

Aircraft Percentage

Fleet Mix



19

Hour Arrival Departure Total

00 8 1 9

01 1 0 1

02 0 0 0

03 0 1 1

04 2 5 7

05 5 2 7

06 8 45 53

07 29 41 70

08 30 45 75

09 22 32 54

10 28 25 53

11 39 25 64

12 35 34 69

13 41 28 69

14 44 37 81

15 41 36 77

16 36 33 69

17 37 44 81

18 41 32 73

19 35 38 73

20 34 41 75

21 30 31 61

22 28 11 39

23 21 9 30

Total 595 596 1191

Traffic Distribution



20

RNAV/RNP Approach to Runway 29

• Baseline• Arrive 4R Depart 4L

• Improvement• Arrive 4R & 29 Depart 4L

• Potential Benefit• Move 5-10 aircraft per hour from 4R to 29.• Addresses Non-homogenous mix

• Potential aircraft for RW29 will be the small and smaller large



21

Separation Rules as Applied

Lead Lead Rwy Trail Trail Rwy Separation

Arrival 29 Arrival 29With GBAS providing a consistent flight path to a visual

approach, it should be possible to reduce the minimum in trail separation to 15NM.

Arrival 4R Arrival 29 Arrival on 4R must land and stop, exit or acknowledge prior to an arrival on 29 given clearance to land.

Arrival 29 Arrival 4R Arrival on 29 must be through intersection prior to arrival on 4R reaching taxiway J.

Arrival 4R Arrival 4R 5MIT, reduce to 2.5MIT based on runway occupancy times

Arrival 4R Depart 4L In IFR these runways act as a single runway. In VFR, these runways are independent.

Depart 4L Arrival 4R In IFR these runways act as a single runway. In VFR, these runways are independent.

Arrival 29 Depart 4L Arrival on 29 must be clear of intersection prior to 4L depart roll

Depart 4L Arrival 29 Departure must be airborne and through the intersection prior to arrival crossing threshold.



22

VFR – Daily Delay Estimates

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Megan: How much did the true distribution of aircraft (smalls) play into this, or was it just 25 and any aircraft?



23

IFR – Daily Delay Estimates



24

VFR – Hourly Delay EstimatesHour Demand

Average DelayPer Operation

(min.)Baseline


(min.)Improvement

0 9 0.1 0.11 1 0.0 0.02 0 0.0 0.03 1 0.0 0.04 7 0.0 0.05 7 0.1 0.06 53 2.6 2.67 70 2.9 2.68 75 3.6 3.69 54 2.6 2.710 53 0.7 0.611 64 3.8 2.012 69 3.9 1.613 69 3.8 1.714 81 7.9 3.515 77 14.8 4.016 69 17.5 2.017 81 16.7 5.018 73 23.0 6.319 73 21.0 3.020 75 21.2 4.821 61 18.6 2.222 39 8.3 0.723 30 1.1 0.7



25

IFR – Hourly Delay Estimates

Hour DemandAverage DelayPer Operation

(min.)Baseline


(min.)Improvement

0 9 0.3 0.11 1 0.0 0.02 0 0.0 0.03 1 0.0 0.04 7 0.1 0.15 7 0.2 0.16 53 4.4 4.37 70 6.3 5.68 75 16.7 11.99 54 29.8 25.910 53 34.8 18.011 64 23.3 7.112 69 25.8 9.113 69 31.0 7.414 81 26.7 10.015 77 36.1 22.916 69 48.6 29.617 81 48.4 24.918 73 66.7 40.519 73 72.6 47.520 75 82.5 52.721 61 109.8 66.822 39 186.6 102.823 30 256.4 80.2


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Initial Simulation Result/ Next Steps

• Providing access to RWY 29 via a generic path was shown to reduce airport delay• Perhaps an obvious result, but now it is verified

• Next Steps:• Refine the RWY 29 approach path so that it fits

within the existing airspace• Agree on the right operational constraints• Identify which separation standards will be used

• Determine the workload impact• Identify tools to assist with RWY29 traffic• Missed Approach is the largest concern for ATC


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Planned Airport Facilities Terminal Integration Laboratory (AFTIL) Simulation• The AFTIL being used for Project Newark

testing.• To help with the previous “spacing tool”

discussion, the AFTIL will be configured exactly as the EWR Tower with the addition of several spacing tools:• Converging Runway Display Aid (CRDA)• Go-Around Spacing Tool• Arrival/Arrival or Arrival/Departure Windows

• RWY29 scenarios can be demonstrated first in the AFTIL for initial hands-on feasibility studies

Presenter

Presentation Notes

“What’s in it for you” slide


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Project Newark Phase II Simulations


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Project Newark Phase II Simulations

• Result of the simulation:• Getting the TRACON and the Tower to work the

problem together in a controlled environment• Tools were useful

• List of revisions were collected• Actions for the TRACON to define airspace needs

• Next simulations planned for Feb 2011• Detailed test plan available


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Phase II Changes to RWY29 RNP

• Discuss changes to the RWY29 procedure• Ground track• Leg types used• Desired time to complete procedure

• Design speed and distance

• Review of recent flight testing

KEWR RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 29 (VIA RWY 4R) Oct 30, 2008 Targets Package


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

KEWR RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 29 (VIA RWY 4R)

Bank Angle 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.6 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.9

ATIS

108.6

RNAV (RNP29) RWY 31Atlantic City APT (ACY)

Orig 060801 35°03’N-89°59’W NEWARK LIBERTY INT (EWR)

RNAV (RNP) RWY 29

CATEGORY A B C D


EXPERIMENTALFOR FAA



HIRL All Rwys

31

13 22

4

10000 x 1806144

x 15

0X

XX

XX

XX

X XX

vv

vv

V

V

P

121

229

V

.90

V

.93V

.74 V

.167

GS 3.00°

TCH 60

1000’

NA

GND CON121.9

CLNC DEL127.85


60318

90 120 150 180477 626 795 954

APP CRS298°


ATCInstructions

TH29

IAF

FAF


920 - 1½579 (600 - 1½)

800 - 1½ 459 (500 - 1½)

CIRCLING

535 - ½920 - 2

579 (600 - 2)Ground Speed 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155

(DEG)

Vert Speed (3.00°) 531 557 584 610 637 663 690 716 743 770 796 823

Turn Time (90º) 1:53 1:48 1:43 1:38 1:34 1:31 1:27 1:24 1:21 1:18 1:15 1:13

DescendingRight TurnDescending

left Turn

TDZE292

2 7

3000

3000

LAASChan 33885

Atlantic City APP CON

124.6 263.6

Atlantic City TOWER 120.3 239.0

2 nm

4.1 nm

4.6 nm

6 nm

61°

6 NM2 NM 4.1 NM

4.6 NM2.35 NM

2325300031RAA

31OIN31ACE

31RAC31RAB

2.35nm

31ACE

31RAC

31RAB

31OIN

31RAA

119°

310°

825

39 27.2N

74 33.8W

39 26.0N

74 30.9W

39 23.1N

74 32.4W

39 23.7N

74 34.9W39 22.9N

74 40.0W

39 18.9N

74 45.8W

RNP 29

Atlantic City RNP Overlay

Newark RWY 29


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Expected Performance

• In previous analysis, we asked the subject pilots, FAA crew, to focus on minimizing Flight Technical Error (FTE) during manual flight

• We ended up with a wide variation in the procedure speed, and inconsistent FTE

• For current testing, the procedure speed were defined, and TAP tests were conducted using the ILS autopilot• Performance can be predicted based on the speed,

turn radius, and bank angle limit of the navigator

ACY RNAV (RNP) Plan View


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

ACY RNAV (RNP) Flight Technical ErrorFAA GBAS RNP29 Flight Test @ ACY

HorizontalGLSDeviation EnsembleG

LS D

evia

tions

Mean 200'D

H: 25.26

StdD

ev 200'DH

: 17.73

NMI from FTPN49 / RPDS33 / 19-Jan-10 A / MMR / 7 Appr / at 150 knots

-300.00

-600.00

-900.00

-1200.00

-1500.00

0.00

300.00

600.00

900.00

1200.00

1500.00

-1.0

0

-2.0

0

-3.0

0

-4.0

0

-5.0

0

-6.0

0

-7.0

0

-8.0

0

-9.0

0

-10.

00

-11.

00

-12.

00

-13.

00

-14.

00

-15.

00

0.00

1.00


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

ACY RNAV (RNP) Flight Technical ErrorFAA GBAS RNP29 Flight Test @ ACY

HorizontalGLSDeviation EnsembleG

LS D

evia

tions

Mean 200'D

H: -6.01

StdD

ev 200'DH

: 2.55

NMI from FTPN49 / RPDS33 / 19-Jan-10 A / MMR / 2 Appr / @160kts

-300.00

-600.00

-900.00

-1200.00

-1500.00

0.00

300.00

600.00

900.00

1200.00

1500.00

-1.0

0

-2.0

0

-3.0

0

-4.0

0

-5.0

0

-6.0

0

-7.0

0

-8.0

0

-9.0

0

-10.

00

-11.

00

-12.

00

-13.

00

-14.

00

-15.

00

0.00

1.00

LAASChan 33885

Bank Angle 4.2 4.6 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.6 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.9

NEWARK ATIS

115.7 134.825

RNAV (GLS) RWY 29Newark Liberty INTL(EWR)

Orig 060801 35°03’N-89°59’W NEWARK LIBERTY INT (EWR)RNAV (GLS) RWY 29

CATEGORY A B C D


EXPERIMENTALFOR FAA



HIRL All Rwys

31

13 22

4

10000 x 1806144

x 15

0X

XX

XX

XX

X XX

vv

vv

V

V

P

121

229

V

.90

V

.93

V

.74 V

.167

GS 3.00°TCH 55’

1000’

NA

GND CON121.8

CLNC DEL118.85


60318

90 120 150 180477 626 795 954

APP CRS275°


ATCInstructions

TH29

IAF

FAF


920 - 1½579 (600 - 1½)

800 - 1½ 459 (500 - 1½)

CIRCLING

535 - ½920 - 2

579 (600 - 2)

Ground Speed 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155

(DEG)

Vert Speed (3.00°) 531 557 584 610 637 663 690 716 743 770 796 823

Turn Time (90º) 1:53 1:48 1:43 1:38 1:34 1:31 1:27 1:24 1:21 1:18 1:15 1:13

DescendingRight Turn Descending

left Turn

TDZE292

2 7

358° toRW36R

TDZE335

7000

44005100

3200

NEW YORK APP CON

128.55 379.9NEWARK TOWER

118.3 257.6

1 nm

3.7 nm2.2 nm

6 nm

4.1 nm

2.2 nm

310°

6 NM 2.2 NM 3.7 NM 1 NM2.2 NM 4.1 NM 2.75 NM

22002500

ISACE

DESKO

ASKERSORTA

DOOIN

JOLLYJUSTI3.0°

2.75 nm

ISACE

JUSTIASKER

JOLLY

DOOIN

SORTA

DESKO

50°110°

41°

N40.701491

W74.160948

N40.697239

W74.097323

N40.644867

W74.065312

N40.629193

W74.072853N40.613991

W74.104227

N40.619577

W74.187882N40.604639

W74.220556

N40.514500

W74.277611

Newark RWY 29

Prototype LAAS TAP

ACY RNAV (GLS) Plan View


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

ACY RNAV (GLS) Flight Technical ErrorFAA GBAS RNAV29 Flight Test @ ACY

HorizontalGLSDeviation Ensemble

GLS

Dev

iatio

nsM

ean 200'DH

: 9.58S

tdDev 200'D

H: 3.39


-300.00

-600.00

-900.00

-1200.00

-1500.00

0.00

300.00

600.00

900.00

1200.00

1500.00

-1.0

0

-2.0

0

-3.0

0

-4.0

0

-5.0

0

-6.0

0

-7.0

0

-8.0

0

-9.0

0

-10.

00

-11.

00

-12.

00

-13.

00

-14.

00

-15.

00

0.00

1.00


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

ACY RNAV (GLS) Flight Technical ErrorFAA GBAS RNAV29 Flight Test @ ACY

HorizontalGLSDeviation Ensemble

GLS

Dev

iatio

nsM

ean 200'DH

: 2.54S

tdDev 200'D

H: 2.25


-300.00

-600.00

-900.00

-1200.00

-1500.00

0.00

300.00

600.00

900.00

1200.00

1500.00

-1.0

0

-2.0

0

-3.0

0

-4.0

0

-5.0

0

-6.0

0

-7.0

0

-8.0

0

-9.0

0

-10.

00

-11.

00

-12.

00

-13.

00

-14.

00

-15.

00

0.00

1.00


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Path Shape Considerations

• An area of continuing study is how to best address non-FMS aircraft

• An R&D project, Terminal Area Path (TAP), provides steering guidance for complex paths• These paths would exactly overlay RNP procedures

• If the RNP were designed such that ILS autopilots could fly them with minimal FTE, more costly aircraft upgrades could be avoided• Easing mixed equipage issues


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Procedure Development Phases (cont.)

• Third Phase• Curved approaches to Runways 04L/R and 11

• Same concept of obtaining input from air traffic and flight testing at the Tech Center applies for this stage of procedure development

• Fourth Phase• Displaced threshold approach to Runway 22R

• Final Phase• Closely spaced parallels and time, spacing, metering

and sequencing procedures• Input from air traffic and flight testing are crucial


Project Newark

October 22, 2010

Summary

• The Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) is one of the FAA Satellite Navigation programs.• Current work is geared toward supporting FAA and

industry decision points on equipage.• Project Newark is a NextGen operational

demonstration.• Will identify performance based navigation

procedures that will support capacity and efficiency enhancements.

• Will also be used to help make decisions on LAAS implementation.

Goals, Objectives, and Simulationslaas.tc.faa.gov/documents/CAAC/CAAC 14 Project Newark.pdf ·...

Documents

Transcript of Goals, Objectives, and Simulationslaas.tc.faa.gov/documents/CAAC/CAAC 14 Project Newark.pdf ·...