GM

17
General Mills’ General Mills’ acquisition of acquisition of Pillsbury from Diageo Pillsbury from Diageo PLC PLC Prepared By:- Rajat Kaul Indrakshi Pulkit Singhal Siddarth Kalra

Transcript of GM

Page 1: GM

General Mills’ acquisition of General Mills’ acquisition of Pillsbury from Diageo PLCPillsbury from Diageo PLC

Prepared By:-Rajat Kaul

IndrakshiPulkit SinghalSiddarth Kalra

Page 2: GM

General Mills’General Mills’Headquartered in Golden Valley,

Minnessota, USFortune 500 company, primarily

concerned with food productsMajor brands:

PillsburyGreen GiantOld El Paso Häagen-Dazs

Page 3: GM

Case Summery Case Summery In December 2000, the shareholders of General Mills were presented with a merger

prospectus and proxy statement that outlined the terms by which General Mills would acquire Pillsbury from Diageo plc. Payment was composed of shares of General Mills stock, assumption of Pillsbury debt, and an unusual contingent payment. The task for the student is to assess and value the contingent payment in an effort to judge the attractiveness of the proposal and to recommend how shareholders should vote on the proposal. The contingent payment resembles a contingent value right (CVR), which provides downside protection to the sellers in an acquisition. CVRs can be modeled as two options:

(1) a long put struck at a low stock price and (2) a short call struck at a higher stock price.

The combination of a CVR with the underlying stock of the buyer transforms the payment to the seller from floating stock to a fixed collar. Student analysis can decompose the contingent payment into its two basic options and value the whole instrument. The teaching objectives of this case are:

(1) to exercise student skills at identifying and valuing options, (2) to illustrate how the use of contingent payments can bridge differing views about the

value of a target firm, and (3) to suggest the important role of synergy expectations in the evaluation of payment

terms.

Page 4: GM

Topics that are covered to solve this Topics that are covered to solve this casecase

Benefit of the acquisitionPresent value of cost savingsDeal structureContingent payment analysisAcquisition costSWOT Analysis of General MillsSWRecommendation

Page 5: GM

Benefits of the AcquisitionBenefits of the Acquisition

Accelerate sales and earnings growth by acquiring Pillsbury

       >  Product Innovation       >  International Expansion       >  Channel Expansion       >  Productivity Gains

Combined product portfolio would be more balanced Combined firm would rank 5th in size among 

competitors based on food sales Cost savings

Page 6: GM

Deal StructureDeal Structure

Payment shares

Assumption of Pillsbury's debt

       > Existing debt = $142m       > New borrowing = $5billion

Contingent payment by Diageo to General Mills

Page 7: GM

Contingent Payment AnalysisContingent Payment Analysis What is it?

      > "Claw-back" or "Contingent Value Right"         

 >>Claw-back is previously given monies or benefits that are taken back due to specially arising  circumstances. A retraction of stock prices or of the market in general.  Purchasing certain investments provides  taxable benefits contingent upon holding periods. When you sell these investments before they have maturity, the benefits must be returned.  In Layman's terms, a fall in a stock price right after an increase is called a clawback of the price.

> Reclaim some value for GM if the stock price more than $42.55 one year after the acquisition

> Diageo will retain its share price if GM stock price drops in one year after the acquisition

Page 8: GM

ContdContd…… What are the terms?

       > $642m if average daily share price for 20 days is greater than or equal to $42.55 > $0.45m if average daily share price for 20 days is less than or equal to $38 > Variable amount: Diageo will retain the amount by which $42.55 exceeds the daily price for 20 days

Page 9: GM

ContdContd…… Why?

       > GM believes their shares are undervalued and the stock price will increase within one year > Diageo believes that the stock price will stay the same or decrease within one year > To bridge gap: GM and Diageo incorporate the contingent payment as described earlier

Page 10: GM

Contd…Contd… Who benefits?

    > GM benefits because GM receives $642m in one year if the average daily share price is $42.55 or more> Diageo benefits because they will not lose value if the price drops

Page 11: GM

ContdContd…… How does it work?

>Buy and sell a put option at the same time

Page 12: GM

Acquisition CostAcquisition Cost

Payment of shares, GM to issue 141m shares of common stock

Assumption of $5.142B of Pillsbury's debt

Transaction cost: $55m

Contingent payment by Diageo to GM in 1 year

Page 13: GM

SWOT Analysis of General Mills’SWOT Analysis of General Mills’Strength Weakness Opportunity Threat

Recognizable name brand

Investment grade bond rating

Difficult times for domestic growth.

Market saturation

Pillsbury means a larger product portfolio domestically and internationally

With Pillsbury they could realize operational efficiencies in areas such as supply chain and marketing

Acquiring Pillsbury means assuming more debt could jeopardize bond rating

Diageo could control 33% of their companyPillsbury deal means opportunity costs. Resources tied up in this acquisition for some time. Limits any new product lines or R&D opportunities.

Strong competition from companies like Kraft and Sara Lee

Page 14: GM

SWOT Analysis of DiageoSWOT Analysis of Diageo

Page 15: GM

Growth and Synergies for GM and Growth and Synergies for GM and PillsburyPillsburyConsummating this deal would essentially double the size of GM.

Pillsbury revenues in fiscal year 2000 were $6.1 billion and GM's were $7.5 billion. This would allow GM to gain much needed shelf space in grocery aisles and give them opportunities to maximize advertising. By integrating the Pillsbury's product lines with existing operations, GM could take advantage of synergies in administrative and production areas such as supply chain costs. Overlapping functions such as marketing could be combined and opportunities for staff and resource reduction could save costs while maintaining high levels of productivity. GM will be handling a much larger volume of materials and products and cost reduction opportunities in the supply chain could prove very beneficial. GM could negotiate lower costs with their partners or threaten to switch to other low cost vendors.

Page 16: GM

RecommendationRecommendationCost savings create positive synergies

Total acquisition cost is somewhere between $10.555B and $11.196B

With synergies, Pillsbury's value is estimated to be $11.3B - $14.2B per Evercore Partners and $11.836B - $13.489B per Merill Lynch

Page 17: GM