GM PROJECT REPORT

58
STRATEGIC PLANNING GM: FINAL PROJECT GM: FINAL PROJECT November 25 th 2016 GENERAL MOTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING Karolina Galinska Lucía Domínguez García-Guijas Santiago Napal Laguna Ángel Solanas López Master in Industrial Engineering + MBA Professor: Manuel R. Tejeiro Koller November 25 th 2016

Transcript of GM PROJECT REPORT

Page 1: GM PROJECT REPORT

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

GENERAL MOTORS STRATEGIC PLANNING

Karolina Galinska

Lucía Domínguez García-Guijas

Santiago Napal Laguna

Ángel Solanas López

Master in Industrial Engineering + MBA

Professor: Manuel R. Tejeiro Koller

November 25th 2016

Page 2: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

1

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Index FIGURE INDEX ................................................................................................................................ 3

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4

ASSIGNMENT 1 .............................................................................................................................. 5

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5

VISION AND MISSION ................................................................................................................ 5

STRATEGIC PLANNING ............................................................................................................... 5

PLANS FOR THE FUTURE............................................................................................................ 8

ASSIGNMENT 2 .............................................................................................................................. 9

STRATEGY STATEMENTS............................................................................................................ 9

MISION STATEMENT.............................................................................................................. 9

VISION STATEMENT ................................................................................................................... 9

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE VALUES ................................................................................... 9

OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................... 11

STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 12

CSR AND ETHICS ...................................................................................................................... 15

ASSIGNMENT 3 ............................................................................................................................ 16

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 16

MACRO-ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (PESTEL) ....................................................................... 16

POLITICAL FACTORS ............................................................................................................. 16

ECONOMIC FACTORS........................................................................................................... 17

SOCIAL FACTORS ................................................................................................................. 20

TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS ................................................................................................. 21

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ................................................................................................ 21

LEGAL FACTORS ................................................................................................................... 21

WEAK SIGNALS, INFLEXION POINTS AND MEGATRENDS .................................................... 22

KEY FACTORS ....................................................................................................................... 22

SCENARIO MAKING ............................................................................................................. 23

SECTOR ANALYSIS (PORTER) ................................................................................................... 24

POTENTIAL ENTRANTS ........................................................................................................ 24

POWER OF BUYERS.............................................................................................................. 25

POWER OF SUBSTITUTES ..................................................................................................... 25

POWER OF SUPPLIERS ......................................................................................................... 26

Page 3: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

2

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

COMPETITIVE RIVALRY ........................................................................................................ 27

COMPARATIVE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE ANALYSIS ............................................................... 30

ASSIGNMENT 4 ............................................................................................................................ 31

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 31

STRATEGIC GROUPS ................................................................................................................ 31

MAPS OF COMPETITORS ......................................................................................................... 32

MARKET SEGMENTS ................................................................................................................ 37

COMPETITOR ANALYSIS AND “BLUE OCEANS” ....................................................................... 38

ASSIGNMENT 5 ............................................................................................................................ 41

RESOURCES, COMPETENCES, THRESHOLD AND DISTINTIVE CAPABILITIES ............................ 41

RESOURCES.......................................................................................................................... 41

COMPETENCES .................................................................................................................... 42

DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES ....................................................................................................... 43

VRIO ......................................................................................................................................... 43

ASSIGNMENT 6 ............................................................................................................................ 46

VALUE CHAIN ........................................................................................................................... 46

VALUE SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 49

SWOT ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................... 51

CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................. 56

BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................. 57

Page 4: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

3

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

FIGURE INDEX Figure 1.Corporate values ........................................................................................................... 10

Figure 2. Stakeholders ................................................................................................................. 14

Figure 3. Power Interest Matrix .................................................................................................. 14

Figure 4. Automotive Sector share of Spanish GDP (%). ........................................................... 18

Figure 5. Evolution of the Spanish employment in recent years. ................................................ 18

Figure 6. Automotive Spanish sector exports and production per vehicle units. ........................ 19

Figure 7. Sales of vehicles in Spain. ........................................................................................... 20

Figure 8. Scenarios ...................................................................................................................... 23

Figure 9. Commercial and personal vehicles sold in Spain in 2015 ........................................... 25

Figure 10. Importance of each supplier sector ............................................................................ 26

Figure 11. Min GM competitors in Spain ................................................................................... 27

Figure 12. Automotive companies market share ......................................................................... 28

Figure 13. GM Five Forces Framework ...................................................................................... 29

Figure 14. GM comparative industry structure analysis ............................................................. 30

Figure 15. Strategic groups ......................................................................................................... 32

Figure 16. Competitors ................................................................................................................ 33

Figure 17. Power-Price Comparison ............................................................................................ 33

Figure 18. Price-Market Share ..................................................................................................... 34

Figure 19. Number of Models-Market share .............................................................................. 35

Figure 20. Innovation- Exclusive design ...................................................................................... 36

Figure 21. Innovation- Exclusive design ...................................................................................... 36

Figure 22. Spanish market ........................................................................................................... 39

Figure 23. Spanish market (II) ..................................................................................................... 39

Figure 24. VRIO ............................................................................................................................ 44

Figure 25. Value chain ................................................................................................................. 49

Figure 26. Value system .............................................................................................................. 50

Figure 27. SWOT analysis ............................................................................................................ 51

Figure 28. Investment in R&D ..................................................................................................... 52

Figure 29. Steel price index ......................................................................................................... 55

Page 5: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

4

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

INTRODUCTION

General Motors is an American vehicle manufacturing company with its headquarters

located in Detroit, Michigan. It is composed by several firms such as Chevrolet, Cadillac

and Opel. The last one is a German brand. We will put special attention in this one, due

to the fact that it is manufactured by GM España, in the factory located in Zaragoza. GM

España represents a 36% of the Opel production. Although the corporative managers

belong to GM, the influence of Opel executives from Germany is really important.

The current company, General Motors Company LLC ("new GM"), was formed in 2009

as a part of its 2009 bankruptcy restructuring, after the bankruptcy of General Motors

Corporation ("old GM"). The new company purchased the majority of the assets of "old

GM", including the name "General Motors". General Motors Corporation led global

vehicle sales for 77 consecutive years from 1931 through 2007, longer than any other

automaker, and is currently among the world's largest automakers by vehicle unit sales.

GM España was responsible for the operation of General Motors businesses in

Spain. It is in charge of the production, marketing and aftersales services of all the cars

manufactured in Spain, including exportation to other countries in Europe. Besides, the

company is responsible for the importation and distribution of Opel cars manufactured in

other countries. The production system is managed in Zaragoza while the aftersales

service is operated in Madrid.

Page 6: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

5

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 1

INTRODUCTION

General Motors is an American vehicle manufacturing company with its

headquarters located in Detroit, Michigan. It is composed by several firms such as

Chevrolet, Cadillac and Opel. The last one is a German brand. We will put special

attention in this one, due to the fact that it is manufactured by GM España, in the factory

located in Zaragoza. GM España represents a 36% of the Opel production. Although the

corporative managers belong to GM, the influence of Opel executives from Germany is

really important.

VISION AND MISSION The vision of the company is to become world leader in automotive products. Its

mission is to be a multinational enterprise which operates all over the globe, offering a

product based in quality and being socially responsible.

With this said, we can proceed to explain the strategic planning GM España

accomplished in 2015. These strategies are mostly corporate-level; however, some

business-level strategies are also explained due to its influence in the development of the

first ones.

STRATEGIC PLANNING

In first place, General motors developed a Business plan deployment (corporate-

level) which consists in 5 business goals (Safety, Quality, Cost, Productivity and People).

A board system has been implemented in order to trace their fulfilment. The objective is

to get all the employees to know the development of those features, so they can see its

participation in the business.

This plan gets shape in the Global manufacturing system (business -level) which

is based on:

- People involved: teamwork and safety

- Quality operations: Information and control

- Short-time manufacturing: FIFO “First In First Out”

- Continuous improvement: Problem solving

- Standardization

Page 7: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

6

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Secondly, GM España increased production and productivity with the new model

implementation (Corporate-level). The year started with the launch of the new Opel

Meriva, it continued with the line production of the Opel Mokka and it ended with the

launch of the Opel Corsa fifth generation.

In addition, a new project was released in collaboration with Citroen (Corporate-

level). The idea behind it is that both companies developed similar concept cars so they

can share suppliers and manufacturing methods. Furthermore, the Citroen model will be

manufactured in the Zaragoza plant in exchange of a percentage of the profit.

A Global exchange policy of human resources has been developed too. The

objective of this strategy is to have high level managers moving among different factories

from different countries and firms which form General Motors. This way they can share

knowledge and experiences. As an example of this, GM España Quality director is an

American “expatriate” who used to work for Chevrolet.

Regarding sustainability, GM España put a big effort on being environmentally

responsible (Corporate-level). This decision affects the whole business from office

departments to the production line. GM set a list of objectives for 2020 which include

reducing a 20% of the total CO2 particles emissions and a 40% of the generated wastes,

and finally developing systems in the production plants to generate at least 125MW of

renewable energy. In practice, they already implemented that year a couple actions to

achieve these goals:

- The first one was to renovate the production line system to make it more

sustainable. It includes changes in Body Shop, Painting, General

Assembly and Logistics. As an example, new robotic welding systems

were introduced in line. This promotes less water consumption and

electricity.

- Furthermore, Opel design engineers also did their part in order to reach the

objectives. A GLP tank was added to the structure of the cars. As a result,

it supposed approximately a 40% cost saving and a 15% CO2 emission

reduction.

- And last, Repsol and GM signed a strategic agreement in order to promote

the use of alternative combustibles. I+D departments of both companies

will work together to make it happen.

GM also accomplished a big innovation in the field of personnel recruitment and

assessment. They collaborated with the University of Zaragoza to give more than 200

internships in 2014, but in 2015 the university network was extended to the United States

(University of Rhode Island), Denmark and Germany. Besides, the hiring process now

Page 8: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

7

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

includes an assessment based on team problem solving, developed in groups of 8 people

where applicants can show their skills and abilities.

One of the GM main principles is ensuring high quality to its clients. To achieve

this, the strategy followed was making a Quality Assurance Plan (Corporate-level). That

plan led to several business-level strategies described by the following measures:

- RCCM (Root Cause Coordinator Meeting)

Is a daily videoconference among ITDC (German engineering company),

supplier’s quality, car lines delegates and after-sale services. The after-sale service

presents the problems occurred with the cars, then are analysed by each department and

solved for the next meeting.

- Plant-Quality Meeting (PQM)

Quality Direction, after-sale service and manufactured engineering are

represented. It is an annual meeting to control internal and external quality parameters.

They are proposed to go to a car dealership to get to know client’s complains and possible

failures.

- Captured Test Fleet (CTF)

A determined number of vehicles are tested in order to detect faults while the

manufacturing process of new models continues.

There were some actions taken in the marketing field as well. GM developed the

ABC program (Business-level). The acronym corresponds to 3 principles: Attract clients,

build relations and customize services. Clients have access to www.miopel.es in which

they can contact their directly suppliers.

And finally, we would like to highlight one last action taken due to the current

situation of the Spanish politics. After all the corruption scenes affecting politics and big

companies GM has decided to work on transparency and open a web where everybody

can access and consult information regarding the financial status of the company. It can

be found at www.gmsustainability.com.

Those are what we have considered the most relevant plans in 2014 and 2015.

However, one of the keys of the General motors success is to look at the long run. For

that reason, they also planned to accomplish some plans in the following years.

Page 9: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

8

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

PLANS FOR THE FUTURE

First, GM has an important commitment with their clients. The products offered

are based on quality and cost. During 2014 they analysed several vehicles from their direct

competitors and they discovered that Opel offers a wider range of models and packages

than most of the similar brands and that makes the overall cost higher. While they don’t

want to reduce the customization options, they want to tighten the range. A plan called

Reducing complexity is being developed. The idea is to reduce the number of models to

a smaller number. They still want to cover the entire diversity that can be found in the

market, but offering just one model per type of car. This way they can focus on the

customization of those models allowing a wider pack of options without increasing the

cost.

Page 10: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

9

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 2

STRATEGY STATEMENTS

First of all, to clarify what General Motors seeks as an organisation and on what

is based on, fundamental goals are going to be described. These goals comprise mission,

vision and main corporate objectives.

MISION STATEMENT

The mission statement of the company expresses its overriding purpose. It will

basically allow stakeholders and employees to uncover what General Motors is there to

do. It will answer fundamental questions such as `What business are GM in?’ or `What

would be lost if the company did not exist? ´.

In particular, the mission of General Motors is described as it follows:

VISION STATEMENT The vision statement is the desired future state of the organisation. It involves

what General Motors seeks to achieve or create in the future (`What does GM

want to achieve?’ or `Sitting here in 20 years, what do we want to have created or

achieved? ´).

So basically, the vision of General Motors could be summarized by the following

way:

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE VALUES

The corporate values are the “principles” that guide the strategy of the

organisation as well as determine the way it should operate. These cores values will

remain inside no matter adverse constraints or situations happened.

According to the GM´s values, we can distinguish among four main principles:

GM mission is to produce and commercialize vehicles at a competitive worldwide level basing the

products on safety, quality and efficient response capability. And to manufacture all the vehicles

demanded by the market. They have a strong commitment with employee’s improvement,

community development and enthusiasm of suppliers, clients and shareholders.

GM pursues to be the leading automotive company in the world. They seek to design,

manufacture and sell the best cars in the world while building loyalty and earning the

enthusiasm of their customers.

Page 11: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

10

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Figure 1.Corporate values

Each of the values commented above, are going to be explained:

- Customer enthusiasm

GM puts the customer at the centre of everything they do. They listen

intently to their customers’’ needs. Each interaction matters. Safety and

quality are foundational commitments, never compromised.

- Continuous improvement

Efficient problem solving, quick response time and simplified design of

products and equipment.

- Excellence

To act with integrity. GM is driven by ingenuity and innovation. They

courage to do what is difficult. Each of them take accountability for results

and have the tenacity to win.

- People involved

CUSTOMER

ENTHUSIASM

CONTINUOS

IMPROVEMENT

EXCELLENCE PEOPLE INVOLVE

GM VALUES

Page 12: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

11

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The success of the company depends on their relationships inside and

outside the company. We encourage diverse thinking and collaboration

from the world to create great customer experiences.

OBJECTIVES

A company of this size has a very long list of objectives classified in a really wide

range of categories. As this is a summary of all of them, we selected the most important

ones, basing this fact in choosing those which have corporate-level effect and reflect the

overall business strategy that the corporation is taking in the last years. We can find the

following:

- Increase the sales volume of new products (launched in the last 18 months) over

the total sales. It is expected for them to grow to a 27% in 2015, to 38% in 2017

and to 47% in 2019.

- Upgrade Cadillac as the luxury brand of the company. Create a new independent

business unit in New York for this purpose. Pursue opportunities of market growth

with more clarity and focusing by launching 9 new models in the next 5 years.

- Keep growing in China. GM plans to invest $14 billion from 2014 to 2018 in order

to open 5 new factories and to support the sales of 5 million cars annually (market

objective).

- Promote GM Financial to increase the sales of brand new products all over the

world. Increase the number of clients in the US, Canada, South America and

Europe and to support its position in the Chinese market (financial and market

objective).

- Reduce costs and complexity in inventories and logistics in order to achieve better

operating margins in the new models. They plan to focus on essential platforms

and they expect 99% of the global production to be from those (financial

objective).

As it can be proved with the examples above, the objectives are consistently

“SMART”: they are specific, measurable, achievable, resource-based and time bound.

Page 13: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

12

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS

The company believes that its success is dependent on relationships with all its

stakeholders. Therefore, embracing continuous, positive and fruitful collaboration is one

of the things company focuses on.

Main stakeholders that General Motors tends to mark out are:

Customers

Direct sale to concessionaires by using Just In Time (JIT) methodologies.

Managers

GM’s Board of Directors is comprised of 12 members. Except Chairman and CEO

Mary Barra, former Vice Chairman Steve Girsky and former UAW Vice President

Joe Ashton, all of the rest directors are independent, as it is defined by the Board’s

Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are based on the standards of the New

York Stock Exchange and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Board has the following standing committees: Audit, Executive

Compensation, Governance and Corporate Responsibility, Finance, Risk, and

Executive. The Audit, Executive Compensation, and Governance and Corporate

Responsibility Committees are composed entirely of independent Directors.

Shareholders

American Syndicate of Workers (33%)

Government of the United States (32%)

Government of Canada (12%)

Common stock (23%)

Banks

Employees - both current and potential new talent

220.000 workers worldwide

5500 workers in GM España factory in Zaragoza, including

subcontractors.

Page 14: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

13

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Suppliers

Approximately 2000 suppliers, such as:

CFF

CEFA

Bridgstone

Mann+Hummel

Gestamp

Sogefi

Axalta coating systems

Saint Gobain

Navarra Estampación e Inyección

Governments at national and lower levels

NGOs (Nongovernmental organizations)

WWF

Proud U.S. Business for Climate Action

Subcontractors

Android

Logiters

Regional Employment Offices

GM contributes to the creation of jobs. GM Spain has partnered with regional

employment office to manage the employment selection processes for GM, which

prepares young candidates for work in the industrial sector.

In particular, GM has signed an agreement with the Instituto Aragonés de Empleo

(INAEM) in order that they will be in charge of all the selection processes for GM.

In order to notice the relevance of the commented stakeholders, a power/interest

matrix has been implemented.

Page 15: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

14

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Stakeholder Type Power Interest

Customers Primary and

external

HIGH HIGH

Managers Primary and

internal

HIGH HIGH

Shareholders Primary and

internal

HIGH HIGH

Banks Primary and

external

HIGH LOW

Employees Primary and

internal

HIGH HIGH

Suppliers Primary and

external

LOW HIGH

Governments Secondary and

external

HIGH LOW

NGOs Secondary and

external

LOW LOW

Subcontractors Primary and

external

LOW HIGH

Regional

Employment

Offices

Secondary and

external

LOW LOW

Figure 2. Stakeholders

Figure 3. Power Interest Matrix

Page 16: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

15

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

CSR AND ETHICS

GM company commitment within stakeholders is boosted with the values

previously described. One of the main strategy pillars is transparency. In this sense, Public

annual reports are published annually and they work to improve their sustainability goals

and to manage the business at its best responsible way.

GM business is more than selling a determined product; it involves values

(customers, relationships and excellence, as commented). In this sense. Excellence means

acting with integrity and diligence (“doing the right thing”). According to this idea, the

GM´s Code of Conduct, which is called “Winning with integrity”, was developed.

Employees are required to complete several ethical courses each year to ensure

the fully understanding of the GM´s policy and procedures.

Furthermore, “Winning with integrity” provides some measures for avoiding

interest conflicts among suppliers and others groups of interest.

GM España promotes integrity, prevention and bad conducts solving. In fact,

every worker can report unethical conducts in an anonymous way by GM´s internal

channel system “Aware line”.

A significant ethical measure was the implementation of the Equity Plan, by which

GM tries to provide a better work-life balance, avoid discrimination and equalise male

and female workers. As a result, the number of female employees has increased by 33%

in the last five years.

There is also a bullying protocol which includes specific measures against

bullying (no matter what type); especially sexual and gender bullying. All workers are

responsible for creating a good atmosphere at work.

Finally, GM takes part in a Diversity Chart since 2012, which is an European

initiative to promote diversity and non-discrimination at workplace. Some measures are:

Support a diverse workforce.

Promote effectively integration.

Expand respect and communication at work.

Respect and be aware of diversity.

Page 17: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

16

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 3

INTRODUCTION

In the following document, an analysis of the factors that most affect to GM

framework is going to be carried out. First of all, we have carried out an external analysis

(PESTEL) to identify what are the most significant environmental threats and

opportunities. Moreover, this will lead us to an internal analysis studio by highlighting

the five competitive forces of Porter.

MACRO-ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (PESTEL) The external analysis is going to be described by categorizing the relevant

environmental factors into six types: political, economic, social, technological, ecological

and legal issues, as follows.

To clarify the conclusions extracted from this analysis, we must say that we are

specifically studying GM España. GM España is in charge of all the vehicles produced in

Spain, but also of all the sales in the country, even if the car was manufactured in a foreign

country. This means that from the production’s point of view we must focus on those

affecting Spain, regardless where the vehicle is sold afterwards. However, from the sales’

perspective, we must focus on every vehicle sold in Spain, regardless where it was

produced.

POLITICAL FACTORS

In order to analyse these factors, we are going to focus on the politics taking place

in Spain. The most important current political factors in this area are the following:

Political encouragement: Plan PIVE, Plan 2000E, Plan VIVE, Plan Renove.

The Spanish Government has promoted since 1994 several incentive plans in

order to increase the number of sales of the automotive sector. By these plans, the

government endeavors to help people to afford a vehicle. In fact, it offers people

a special discount or low financing cost at the time of acquiring a new car.

Since this plans provides economic aids for people that want to change their old

car for a new one, this factor highly affects car’s renewal and increase vehicle

sales.

Most of these plans conclude at the end of this year or at the beginning of the next

one. There are no renewal plans following these dates due to the political

uncertainty.

Page 18: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

17

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Tax system: plate tax, VAT (Value-Added Tax), Traffic taxes, Special tax on

emissions.

The automotive industry is one of the sectors which most contributes to the

Spanish tax system due to the fact that people have to pay taxes during its whole

life cycle. Firstly, it is compulsory to pay the plate tax as well as the VAT when

people buy a vehicle. In addition, vehicle usage comprises several taxes such as

the traffic tax or an extra tax depending on the amount of emissions produced.

Besides, the trend of the VAT percentage rate through the last years has increased

significantly in the region. Therefore, vehicle companies have been forced to

narrow margins to maintain market prices.

Spanish authority DGT (Traffic General Direction) campaigns against

speeding, alcohol and drug consumption. Speed radars and alcohol tests.

The Spanish Government carries out measures which involve society awareness.

In this sense, the traffic authority launches several campaigns related to speeding,

alcohol and drug consumption to concern people about those issues.

Practical actions also comprise the implementations of radar to control vehicles

speed and unforeseen alcohol/drugs tests.

All this actions have affected car purchasing. The average age of car buyers has

increased due to the fact that young people can’t afford cars themselves and their

parents refuse to pay for them because of the risks.

ECONOMIC FACTORS

The most relevant economic factors are explained as follows:

Petroleum price

In the last recent years, the petroleum price, and consequently the gas price, have

gone down. The reason for this is the new methods promoted by the US to extract

this material. Therefore, Middle East countries have been forced to reduce their

prices to keep market domain.

As a consequence, people is willing to take on the cost of daily gasoline rather

than buying low consumption vehicles (Hybrids) that require a higher initial

investment.

Fast-growing sector

Page 19: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

18

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The automotive sector is highly relevant for the development for the Spanish

economy due to the following reasons:

The automotive sector in Spain represented a 6% of its GDP in 2013. This

figure has risen up to 7.3% in 2015, what means a favorable tendency for

this sort of industry. This tendency can be observed in Figure 1.

Figure 4. Automotive Sector share of Spanish GDP (%).

ANFAC

As it is described in Figure 2, the automotive industry comprises the 9%

of the Spanish employment in 2015, including direct and indirect jobs.

Figure 5. Evolution of the Spanish employment in recent years.

Page 20: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

19

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The industry comprises the 85% of the exports in 2015. As the below

figure demonstrates, the number of exports and units produced has

increased since the recession period (2011).

Figure 6. Automotive Spanish sector exports and production per vehicle units.

ANFAC

Crisis effect

Since the Spanish economy is progressively recovering from the recession period

suffered in 2011, the number of car registrations has increased. Sales figures are

indicated in Figure 4 and 5. In addition, Figure 5 also shows that the number of

GM vehicles sold in 2015 is highly relevant compared to competitors´ sales.

In 2011, GDP rises to values close to years prior to the crisis, but prices of vehicles

didn’t grow so fast. Therefore, it has been a good opportunity for investing in

transportation over the last years.

Page 21: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

20

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Figure 7. Sales of vehicles in Spain.

ANFAC

Another factor becoming more and more important in the last years is that people

take into account very importantly gas consumption and efficiency. This could be

mainly because crisis made people care much more about costs and gas represents

one to be considered. Nevertheless, other factors such as sustainability and

environmental care may also reinforce this fact.

Crisis has also affected salaries. On the one hand people have less purchasing

power, what reduces potential clients. On the other hand, employees in this

industry are also paid less, what allows companies to tighten costs, and thus,

prices.

In addition, interest rates are very low nowadays. This encourages people to

finance this type of expenses, increasing sales in the sector.

SOCIAL FACTORS

An important fact in developed countries is that people associates vehicle brands

to their owner’s status. This highly affects prestige brands such as Mercedes, BMW and

so on. Therefore, we can expect a tendency in the following years of people investing

more money in quality-based vehicles in order to improve their social reputation, as long

as they can afford it.

And last, we can also observe that different social groups look for different vehicle

features. In a simplified way, we can say that younger people look for fast, sportive and

fresh-design cars while older people looks for comfortability and reliability.

Consequently, marketing has to be specific for certain clusters and the brand’s reputation

plays a significant role.

Page 22: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

21

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Since current lifestyle is leading people to move to cities for decades, customers

require more practical cars like small size or low-powered cars. This makes the sector

adapt designs and engines to these preferences in order to survive in the market.

TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS

Several technological recent chances have been considered:

More information available and customization via internet: Since the

worldwide technological revolution, people have more access firm´s information

and can customize their vehicles´ characteristics by adding new parts, colors,

engines, shapes, and so on.

New sources to buy cars, besides dealers. A second-hand market has been

developed via internet. Moreover, Internet give people the possibility of entering

in a new digital market where they can sell or buy second-hand vehicles. As a

response, firms developed second-hand car sections in their webs.

Electric and hybrid car development due to petroleum dependence.

Petroleum reserves are limited, so new green energy sources have to be

implemented in order to guarantee the energy usage and sustainability in the

forthcoming future. That is why a development in electric or hybrid technologies

is expected to happen.

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Traditional gasoline engines are becoming socially adverse. People tend to buy

bio-diesel cars or even hybrid and electric. While a market might lose potential in the

long run, a new market of bio-diesels, hybrid engines and electric motor development

opens up.

In addition, average emission rates in Spanish are below European Union

restrictions. The legal regulations are explained below (topic 2.6).

LEGAL FACTORS

Spain has to obey EURO 6 regulations spread by the Union. The limit of NOx

emissions for diesel engines is 0.08 mg/km and 0.06 mg/km for gas engines.

Page 23: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

22

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

From the manufacturer’s perspective we can find legal regulations regarding

maximum emission rates (EURO 6). When designing and manufacturing, this feature has

to be considered. Therefore, companies have to invest in testing to make sure they respect

regional legislation.

In Spain, this factor is particularly important due to the introduction of driving

licenses by points.

WEAK SIGNALS, INFLEXION POINTS AND MEGATRENDS

The unique future tendencies that we can identify are a weak signal which explains

that the increase in hybrid and electric car sales might indicate society willing to move

towards a green and sustainable transportation frame. It could mean an inflexion point in

the future when electric cars resources are developed enough to compete against

traditional gas engines. On the other hand, we do not observe a relevant megatrend.

KEY FACTORS

The main identified key factors are the following ones:

1) Increase in sales due to optimal current situation.

This means that companies, which base their production on costs, will have a

remarkable rise in sales because people are may take advantage of the optimal

situation to buy these type of cars (cost reduction and PIVE/Renove plans).

2) Gas consumption awareness in economic and environmental sense.

This is people’s consciousness regarding gas consumption. Not only because they

care about their own economy, but also because they care about the environment.

This also includes any other benefit that can be taken out of making consumption

more efficient, such as vehicle autonomy.

3) Electric car development due to petroleum dependence and sustainability.

Short-term expectations about the development of new technologies in the

automotive industry, especially electric engines or other technologies related to

reduce the necessity of fossil fuels.

Page 24: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

23

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

SCENARIO MAKING

Austerity mindset Natural trend Innovation race

1 ↑ (moderate) = (remains the same) ↓ (moderate)

2 = (remains the same) ↑ (moderate) ↑↑(severe)

3 = (remains the same) ↑ (moderate) ↑↑ (fast penetration) Figure 8. Scenarios

Austerity mindset

This scenario represents what would be perfect for General Motors in economic

terms.

On the one hand, we see an increase in sales of cost-based products. This is the

tendency that we observed during the first years of this decade. Despite crisis was

not overcome, people took advantage of the reduction on prices in this sector and

decided to invest in this type of cars. Here this trend will keep on going. Besides,

GM is also focused on making consumption more efficient, so people care about

this in the current scenario. However, people are not completely falling into a

radical tendency in this way because that could mean a rise in hybrid cars sales.

On the other hand, there won’t be a lot of new technologies entering the market,

because GM is focused on traditional engines, and they could mean a significant

decrease in sales for our company. Nevertheless, the reality is that these

technologies will arise sooner or later. So being optimistic, they will remain the

same in the short term.

Innovation race

In opposition to the previous scenario, we see here a big penetration of new

technologies due to the fact that people is very conscious about gas consumption,

petroleum dependency and sustainability. Furthermore, the tendency of cost-based

cars becoming more and more popular ends. Crisis is overcome and people’s

economy is better, so there is a trend of people investing more money on quality-

based products and new technologies.

Natural trend

This scenario represents something in between the previous two. We consider that

people will still buy cost-based cars, but the opportunity to purchase this kind of

cars at a really good price is over (PIVE plan and others end this year). However,

it is still a product affordable for the majority of the population and people will

keep consuming it. Consequently, we can assume that economy gets better, but it

reaches a steady state of slow and constant growth.

Page 25: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

24

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

As said before, new technologies will enter the market. In this case we consider

that they will do it slowly due to the fact that resources for electric cars are not

enough yet (public battery charging mainly). However, we can already see the

popularity of hybrid cars going up, so we will consider a moderate rise in this type

of technologies.

SECTOR ANALYSIS (PORTER)

The analysis is based on analysis the Porter´s Five Forces Framework in order to

identify the attractiveness on GM. General Motors manufactures half a million vehicles

per year. They have one main factory located in Zaragoza, where they manufacture the

Opel Corsa and the Opel Meriva and Opel Mokka. General Motors manufactures both

individual and commercial vehicles.

POTENTIAL ENTRANTS

In the car-manufacturing sector the threat of new entries is not very big. This is

due to the high barriers of entry. The first big barrier is the initial investment that any firm

of the sector has to take. This investment is big because the fixed assets needed to

manufacture vehicles are really high. The main purchases that a company in this sector

has are the plant and equipment, the employees, the raw materials and the technology.

They should also have some research and development costs as the sector is a

nonstop development. Without the research and development, the company will have no

future and therefore won’t be able to stay in the market. Another barrier to the market is

the brand image the firm needs. As most companies the customers must know the brand

and there will therefore have big marketing costs.

The economies of scale are really important in this type of business. The existing

companies have big business groups, and are worldwide firms. They have big levels of

production which allow them to reduce the unitary cost of their products when they

increase their production. This will avoid small companies entering the market.

The car-manufacturing sector has a steep learning curve; this means that the

companies in the sector will be old businesses which have learned from their past years.

If a new business enters the sector they will need to move along the learning curve which

will be difficult if they have no experience.

Another key factor which makes it difficult for new entries in the sector is the

need of suppliers. All the existing companies have a big supplier network, some of them

are exclusive to the company and this will make it difficult for new companies.

Page 26: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

25

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The last important factor that has to be taken into account is the need of good

distribution channels. If the firm is able to manufacture the vehicles but cannot reach the

final customers the company will sink. This is why it is important to have authorized

dealers, which will make the link between the production and the final customer.

POWER OF BUYERS

In the car-manufacturing sector the buyers have a big negotiation power. This is

due to the fact that the customers are usually dealers of mid to big size, and they are able

to interfere in the price of the product. The companies which acquire several vehicles at

the same time may be able to change the price or try to do economies of scale because

they have a bigger negotiation power.

The crisis period that began in 2008 has influenced the negotiation power of the

customers. The vehicle manufacturing businesses had a big stock and they needed to

liquidate it. In order to do so they have reduced the prices of the vehicles during the last

years. The demand of vehicles has gone down due to the recession, and the customers

have gained in negotiation power. This has made it possible for the customers to interfere

in the price, the way the payments are done, the characteristic of the products and other

facilities.

Nowadays, due to the maturity and the excess of the sector, customers have taken

advantage by the increasing competition in the sector making the product more

homogeneous. This competition has brought the price of the vehicles to the lowest

possible levels. If vehicle companies won’t lower they prices they won’t be competitive

and will surely need to leave the business.

POWER OF SUBSTITUTES

In 2015, 51421 commercial vehicles and 2218980 particular vehicles were sold in

Spain, which add up to 2733201 vehicles sold in total.

Figure 9. Commercial and personal vehicles sold in Spain in 2015

Page 27: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

26

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The car-manufacturing sector has somewhat considerable threats of substitution.

Taxis has always been a possible substitute, especially in short-distances within cities.

However, it hasn’t been a feasible option to sustainable substitute cars due to the high

prices. Nevertheless, new apps such as Uber or Car To Go allows people to quickly move

from one point of the city to another at relatively low prices. These are the two main

substitute forces related to technology development.

In the medium-long distances the main substitute in Spain has been the AVE.

These trains might be a threat because it has a competitive price, shorter journey time and

it is more comfortable. The main journeys that have seen the number of cars reduced since

the AVE is operating are Madrid-Barcelona, Madrid- Valencia and Madrid-Seville.

Therefore, the AVE might be a threat to the vehicle sector.

The electric and hybrid vehicles aren’t seen as substitutes nowadays. They are

seen as evolutions of the product but they will certainly gain a big importance in future

years. That is why all the firms of the car-manufacturing sector must have a big research

and development capital. General motors have done some studies in order to start

manufacturing hybrid car, but this won’t be done in Spain.

POWER OF SUPPLIERS

In Spain, the main association is the SERNAUTO (Asociación Española de

Fabricantes de Equipos y Componentes). This group includes suppliers from different

sectors, as the vehicles need many different suppliers. In the pie chart we can see the

importance of each supplier sector.

Figure 10. Importance of each supplier sector

Motor 24%

Electrical components

11%

Plastic3%

Bodywork30%

Tires1%

Chassis21%

Other10%

Page 28: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

27

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The main reason affecting suppliers’ bargaining power in this case is the relative

size of the supplier and the car manufacturer. In most cases car companies are way larger

than their suppliers. This leads to an apparently low bargaining power. However, some

of those suppliers are still very large companies which provide devices to several car

companies. For example, BASF and Bridgestone supply raw materials and systems to a

lot of car manufacturers, therefore their bargaining power rises.

Furthermore, some parts are especially design for a particular vehicle, but it is

outsourced to a supplier, in this case the supplier gains power, regardless its size, due to

the uniqueness of the device.

To conclude, local suppliers have, in general, small negotiating power, whereas

large international suppliers have a bigger market to supply and therefore a big influence

over GM.

COMPETITIVE RIVALRY

General motors’ main competitors are Nissan, Volkswagen, Mercedes, seat, Ford

and PSA. They have fabric all over Spain: Ávila (Nissan), Barcelona (Seat and Nissan),

Madrid (Iveco and PSA), Navarra (Volkswagen), Palencia (Renault), Santander (Nissan

and Mercedes-Benz EvoBus), Sevilla (Renault), Valencia (Ford), Valladolid (Iveco and

Renault), Vigo (PSA), Vitoria (Mercedes-Benz) and Zaragoza (Opel).

Figure 11. Min GM competitors in Spain

Page 29: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

28

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

The main market share is therefore divided in a small amount of companies. As it

can be seen in the pie chart, there are only 9 companies manufacturing vehicles in Spain.

The biggest one is Seat.

Figure 12. Automotive companies market share

87% of the GM manufactured vehicles in Spain are exported. 2.03 million cars

were exported in 2015 to Germany (14.7%), United Kingdom (13.6%), Italy (7.8%) or

Belgium (2.9%).

After the economic crisis, the number of sold vehicles has been increased. The

companies must offer a greater innovation to attract clients. All companies have tried to

reduce their costs. This fact has encouraged a greater rivalry among companies in the

sector.

Most of the car-manufacturing companies have changed their strategies. The fact

that the vehicles are similar has obligated the companies to keep an eye on each other’s

work. They need to be up to date to keep in the sector.

Each firm has a great variety of vehicles to keep the largest number of customers

in their market. They are also trying to add different customized vehicles. To keep in the

market and avoid the other companies growing above them general motors needs to invest

in development and keep their products competitive.

General Motor’s main competitor in Spain is Volkswagen. Volkswagen has a big

part of the market share thanks to brands such as Seat or Audi. The group has an old

history and experience in Spain. They are leader in to small vehicles market.

Seat20%

Ford 17%

PSA16%

Renault14%

GM10%

Nissan8%

Volkswagen 8%

Iveco 6%

Irizar1%

Page 30: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

29

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Figure 13. GM Five Forces Framework

VERY HIGH

COMPETENCE

LOW THREAT

MEDIUM THREAT

MEDIUM

NEGOCIATION

POWER

RELATIVELY HIGH

POWER

Page 31: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

30

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

COMPARATIVE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE ANALYSIS

To sum up, we state here some bullet points extracted from the analysis:

In 5 years the entry threats won’t change.

Rivalry will be higher as some other companies like Tesla will be entering

the Spanish market.

Substitute will be higher as new technologies arise and the possibility of

new transport or higher taxes to the vehicles might appear.

Supplier power will be higher because they are starting to form

associations and the bigger the association the higher the power they have.

Buyer power will remain unchanged as the customers will continue buying

cars individually

Figure 14. GM comparative industry structure analysis

Page 32: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

31

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 4

INTRODUCTION

In the following document, we continue developing in more detail our company´s

external analysis. GM´s strategic groups as well as market segments are going to be

described. This will lead to compare GM with the competence in several success factors

in order to analyse its situation, forecast the evolution of the sector and identify “blue

oceans” (new market space).

STRATEGIC GROUPS

Strategic group is a group of companies within a given industry that have similar

strategic characteristics, following similar strategies or simply competing on similar

bases. Such grouping allows us to understand better what kind of competition the

company has to deal with, what opportunities can GM takes advantage of and, if it wants

to do so, what will be the obstacles to overcome.

How can we assign a company to a particular strategic group? There are several

factors that can significantly distinguish firms within industry. Nevertheless, it’s useful

to take under consideration characteristics concerning scope of activities like extent of

product diversity, geographical coverage, and number of market segments served,

distribution channels or resource commitment like extent of branding, marketing effort,

extent of vertical integration, product or service quality, technological leadership or size

of an organization.

However, we have decided to focus on the factors we think are the most important

for GM España. First step in distinguishing strategic groups is choosing strategic

dimensions that differentiate companies. As we analyse the automobile industry, we have

chosen characteristics that require significant commitments which are:

● Degree of vertical integration

● Degree of product scope

The first strategic group is characterized by high level of vertical integration and

great range of products. It is formed out of companies that were the most important

players in the United States’ car-manufacturing industry before the oil crisis in 1970s:

Ford, Chrysler and General Motors. All these companies have a wide offer of cars, and

can therefore have a wider target market. As these companies faced similar opportunities

and threats they performed tacit collusion to avoid harmful high competitive rivalry

strategies such as price wars.

Page 33: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

32

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

In response to such powerful formation a new group has emerged. It was

characterized by much lower range of products and warm relationships with suppliers

instead of integrating them. The combination of these two factors allowed to keep low

inventory levels as well as making manufacturing more efficient. Nevertheless, at some

point in time, the scope of products has increased so as to compete better with the first

group. These companies were Toyota, Honda and Nissan.

GM has a very high degree of vertical integration because they produce many of

the components that they use to build their cars (in 2008 they produced 423011 vehicles

and 164930 components). Toyota on the other hand, worked to streamline the production,

they rearranged their supplier’s factory in order to reduce their costs, and therefore kept

their vertical integration at low levels.

Companies such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz have a lower range of products as

they have a different strategy. They are focused on higher quality vehicles so they do not

compete in the same market segment as GM, Toyota, Honda or Nissan. The analysis can

be represented in the table below:

Strategic group Degree of vertical

integration

Degree of product of scope

General Motors, Ford,

Chrysler

high high

Toyota, Honda, Nissan low high

BMW, Mercedes-Benz high low

Figure 15. Strategic groups

MAPS OF COMPETITORS We are going to compare GM with the industry´s competitors according to the

following relevant parameters: the price, engine power, market share, number of models,

innovation and exclusive design.

The comparison among GM and the rest of the industry´s competitors in the

Spanish industry could be summarized in following table:

Page 34: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

33

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Power (HP) Price ($) Innovation (1-10) Exclusive design (1-10) # models Market share (%)

1 Mercedes 250 40000 9 8 10 2,5

2 BMW 270 35000 8 7 7 4,2

3 Audi 180 30000 7 5 9 3,7

4 Ferrari 450 270000 7 10 3 0,01

5 Lamborghini 550 230000 8 9 4 0,02

6 Bugatti 800 1000000 3 10 1 0

7 PSA 90 15000 4 2 7 13,1

8 Renault 110 20000 4 3 7 7,5

9 Opel 100 17000 5 3 8 7,4

10 Nissan 160 25000 7 5 5 5,3

11 Toyota 120 18000 5 4 3 4,8

12 Seat 90 13000 3 3 5 7,5

13 Volkswaggen 110 22000 6 4 7 8,5

14 Ford 140 26000 7 5 5 6,2

Figure 16. Competitors

To analyse in more detail, the current situation of GM and try to find its real

competitors, several plots have been implemented according to the parameters mentioned

above.

1) Price-Power Comparison

Figure 17. Power-Price Comparison

As it can be observed, we can distinguish four main clusters. We can extract that

the more power the car has, the higher its price. The first one is only composed by Bugatti

which offers highly-power and expensive cars. the second one includes Ferrari and

Lamborghini, the third one comprises Mercedes and BMW, but we put special attention

on the third one, which includes GM. Opel, Audi, PSA, Renault, Nissan, Toyota, Seat,

Volkswagen and Ford are located in the same cluster. Therefore, these companies

represent the current GM´s competitors in the Spanish market in terms of price and power.

12

3

4

5

6

7891011121314

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000

Po

wer

[H

P]

Price [$]

Price-Power

Opel

Page 35: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

34

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

These firms offer medium power cars at a reasonable price (differences in price car among

them are not so significant).

2) Price-Market share comparison

Figure 18. Price-Market Share

The table above indicates that the lower the vehicle´s price is, the higher its

company´s share market is. In this sense, four different clusters can be observed. In order

to calculate the price of each firm’s product we have taken the average price of all their

products. Firms as Ferrari, Bugatti and Lamborghini have the lowest market shares rates,

but this is due to the fact that they target a niche market. On the other hand, the highest

market share in Spain corresponds to PSA. Companies which have a similar share market

than GM´s represent our competitors, which are: Renault, Nissan, Toyota, Seat,

Volkswagen and Ford.

1

23

45 6

7

89

1011

1213

14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000

Mar

ket

shar

e [%

]

Price [$]

Price-Market share

Opel

Page 36: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

35

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

3) Numbers of models and market share comparison

Figure 19. Number of Models-Market share

Here we can see that companies with the highest market share have between 5 and

8 models. This is probably because with that number the brand provides enough diversity

for every type of customer, but at the same time their production complexity is not too

high. This fact allows to keep prices competitive while covering every single customer

need. Evaluating, particularly, the upper cluster (Where Opel is held) we can see that all

the brands of that group (Volkswagen, PSA, Renault…) offer at least a SUV model, a

compact model, a family car and a business vehicle. So they all compete, not only in the

same market, but also on every business line.

As we commented in the first assignment, Opel seeks a reduction in complexity.

As we can observe, Opel is the company with the highest number of models of the cluster.

This might be the reason why they want to limit themselves to only one car of the same

kind and therefore reduce the number of models to 5-6. This would allow them to keep

covering the range of products the other companies do, but at the same time become more

competitive on costs.

Mercedes

BMWAudi

Ferrari LamborghiniBugatti

PSA

Renault

Opel

Nissan

Toyota

Seat

Volkswaggen

Ford

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mar

ket

shar

e [%

]

Number of models

Number of models-Market share

Page 37: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

36

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

4) Price-Innovation and Price-Exclusive Design comparison

Figure 21. Innovation- Exclusive design

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000

Títu

lo d

el e

je

Título del eje

Price Innovation- Price Exclusive Design

Price - Innovation

Price - Exclusive design

Opel

Bugatti

Bugatti

Ferrari & Lamborghini

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8 10

Excl

usi

ve D

esi

gn

Innovation

Innovation - Exclusive design

Innovation - Exclusive design

Exponencial (Innovation -Exclusive design)

Figure 20. Innovation- Exclusive design

Page 38: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

37

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

As it can be deducted from the above diagrams, there is a clear correlation

(exponential behaviour) between the grade of innovation in a firm and the exclusive

design of its models. Moreover, related to the car price, the higher the innovation and the

exclusive car design is, the higher the price of sale, because quality process and R&D

technologies are expensive to implement.

By analysing the first plot, we can distinguish four main clusters. As it happens in

the previous comparisons, GM belongs to the biggest one. That is why its main

competitors in terms on innovation and model´s design are: Audi, Renault, Nissan,

Toyota, Seat, Volkswagen and Ford.

As a whole, after analysing the situation of GM in the Spanish market against

rivals for the success factor mentioned above, we can conclude that GM should consider

the following competitors: Renault, Nissan, Toyota, Seat, Volkswagen; as all of them

belong to the same cluster for almost all the factors considered in the market, offering

similar vehicles characteristics, quality and distribution channels.

MARKET SEGMENTS Now, we can go ahead and analyse the customers. We are going to try to classify

all the customers in the automotive market based on some differenced factors.

1) FACTOR 1: AGE

This factor highly influences the car the customer is looking for. In fact, in the last

years some brands have worked hard in order to change their image and attract new

customers. For example, Mercedes was a brand which stood out for being known as “a

brand for old wealthy people”. However, nowadays, there are a lot of models oriented to

young folks.

Opel has focused on attracting new customers as well. Specially, the Opel Corsa

has been re-designed to achieve a “modern look”. Besides, a lot of new options and

packages are available so customers can customize the car as they wish.

2) FACTOR 2: WORKING PATTERNS

This factor is related to the fact that business today requires movement. An

important rate of the working population needs a car to work. In this sense, the car not

only represents a transportation method, but also the business status within and without

the company. People will be classified by the car they have, and will be willing to buy an

expensive car only to increase their status.

Opel developed a business car for this purpose called Opel Insignia. It represents

the “high level” model of the company being the more comfortable and powerful of the

Page 39: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

38

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

brand. They were pretty successful in that way, to the point that politic official cars in

Spain are mostly Insignia and Volkswagen phaeton, its direct competitor.

3) FACTOR 3: MOBILITY NEEDS

Some people also need particular features in cars due to climate conditions and

road conditions. For example, people that live in small towns or villages might prefer a

SUV model to be able to drive through tough road conditions. Besides, People who like

to sky will probably choose AWD traction. And last, families with kids may set comfort

above any other feature to travel.

Opel takes all this into account. The Opel Mokka is an SUV designed for mountain

roads, but it also has a desirable size for the city, so people don’t have to choose between

safety and practicality. Furthermore, the Opel Insignia has a family version that increases

internal size. And in addition, almost all their models include an AWD option.

COMPETITOR ANALYSIS AND “BLUE OCEANS”

Lastly, in this part we will continue comparing GM with the competitors in the

automotive Spanish market by developing a strategy canvas. The strategy canvas permits

to compare competitors according to their perceived performance on a range of success

factors. This will lead us to emphasize those factors that differentiate the company. We

continue considering the critical success factor explained in the beginning of this

document, involving price, power, market share, number of models, innovation and

exclusive design.

The strategy canvas for automotive companies, including each firm´s value

curves, in the Spanish market is:

Page 40: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

39

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Figure 22. Spanish market

Figure 23. Spanish market (II)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Innovation (1-10) Exclusive design (1-10) # models Market share (%)

Mercedes BMW Audi Ferrari Lamborghini

Bugatti PSA Renault Opel Nissan

Toyota Seat Volkswaggen Ford

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Potencia (HP) Precio

Mercedes BMW Audi Ferrari Lamborghini

Bugatti PSA Renault Opel Nissan

Toyota Seat Volkswaggen Ford

Page 41: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

40

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

According to the strategy canvas, we can observe that there is almost a “blue

ocean” or a market space for GM related to the number of models, because there are only

two competitors (Audi and Mercedes) which are perceived better than us in this aspect.

GM ought to carry out some measures in order to turn this market opportunity into an

advantage. In theory, GM could be more competitive by increasing the number of models

offered, but in practice it contradicts one of the main GM´s strategies which is, in fact,

reducing those models. To conclude, GM should maintain its current number of models

in order to keep its position in the market and accomplish its strategy plan.

Page 42: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

41

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 5 In this section, main GM´s resources and competences are going to be identified.

Then, those resources and competences have been classified as threshold or distinctive

capabilities. Finally, the most relevant capabilities have been assessed according to

VRIO´s four key criteria (value, rarity, inimitability and organizational support), what

allows them to be distinguish as temporary/sustained advantages or disadvantages for

GM.

RESOURCES, COMPETENCES, THRESHOLD AND DISTINTIVE

CAPABILITIES

In order to study General Motor's portfolio, a brainstorming session was made. All

the ideas for the resources and competences were studied and some have been examined

more carefully. The resources and competences were classed in threshold (in green in

the list) and distinctive (in red).

Threshold capabilities refer to those which are necessary for GM so as to compete

against competitors in parity conditions, but they are not distinctive. Distinctive

capabilities were selected to make GM successful nowadays, although maybe not in the

forthcoming future.

General Motor´s resources (what it has) as well as its competences (what Gm does

well) are presented as follows:

RESOURCES

Product development technologies (e.g. pilot program with Mapquest, OnStar

Stolen Vehicle Slowdown Service, standardized computer-aided design system)

Management technologies (e.g. streamline and control of supply chain)

Brand image

International networks

Innovative and highly developed manufacturing plants

Financial resources

Customer database

Strong brand portfolio

Company’s culture (competitive spirit but also diversity, inclusion, mutual

respect, and responsibility)

Patents

Strategic alliances: Common groups to develop and launch projects faster and

easily penetrate the market

Page 43: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

42

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Multiple brand commitment

International experience

COMPETENCES

Ability to efficiently manage supply chain

Leadership in vehicle electrification with advancements in batteries, electric motors and power controls

International experience

Industrial involvement since its beginnings: fourth brand in automotive history (1862).

Team alignment: interests align among workers and shareholders in order to

accomplish best performance (60% of shares own by GM personnel).

Ability to develop new IT solutions (products and management software e.g. supply

chain management - algorithms for estimating throughput performance, identifying bottlenecks, and optimizing buffer allocation)

Ability to efficiently manage cooperation with suppliers: high requirements for suppliers for the sake of continuous improvement.

Internal rotation: employees moving throughout different areas to get an overall view of the company in order to promote the management levels.

Interdepartmental grouping: ability to assign people from different departments to

manage the launch of new models in short periods of time.

Ability to efficiently manage marketing operations (eg. limiting product portfolio)

Threshold activities (color green) were classified as so if they met following

criteria:

they need to be met so as a GM is able to survive and compete in automobile

industry.

And therefore due to high level of competition in automobile industry, lack of

product development would result in staying behind, not meeting constantly raising

customers’ expectations and therefore higher risk of failure or loses. Furthermore,

economy of scale plays an important role in creating competitive position in a car market.

Therefore, international networks are a key factor that allow to compete in globalization

era. Financial resources are a muscle that also supports the economy of scale. Ability to

enter new markets and grow is a key to achieve parity in with competitors in the market.

Moreover, as car manufacturing companies need a lot of resources as inputs like

labor, parts and raw materials. Profitability of GM is dependent on bargaining power of

suppliers. That is why efficient supplier management was classified also as a threshold

activity. Also, marketing strategy plays one of the most important roles in achieving

General Motor’s goals and objectives. Without constantly reminding customers of its

presence a company wouldn’t survive in intense competitive environment.

Page 44: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

43

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

In contrast, distinctive capabilities (color red) are those that:

are required to gain competitive advantage.

Database of customers helps to understand purchasers better. It allows to develop

products accordingly to their preferences and needs and build better relationship with

them. Strategic alliances give GM competitive advantage because it allows to launch

projects faster and penetrate new markets more easily and quickly. Thanks to

international experience company has more knowledge that can be applied during

entering new markets or improving in ones that it already exists in. Combination of

capabilities like team alignment, company’s culture, internal rotation and

interdepartmental grouping help to accomplish high level of performance that raises

probability of gaining leading position in the market.

DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES

Then the ability of the company to renew and recreate its strategic capabilities has

been examined. These dynamic capabilities are necessary for efficient operations. GM´s

dynamic capabilities are those which allow GM to survive in the future. So, GM would

be successful in the future if the company:

Ability to reconfigure, invest in technologies, plants, markets so as to meet

demand due to strong finance muscle, international experience and

development departments

Ability to measure and predict customer preferences due to well-developed

database of customers

Seizing through product development (e.g. Mapquest, OnStar Stolen Vehicle

Slowdown Service)

VRIO To conclude, the most important GM´s capabilities considered above (comprising

threshold and distinctive capabilities) are examined according to VRIO´s four key

criteria. VRIO takes into account if GM´s capabilities add value to customers (value), are

uniquely possessed by GM (rarity), are highly difficult to copy (inimitable) and are

supported by the whole organisation. This analysis will lead to classify those capabilities,

in comparison with competitors´ ones, as competitive advantages (temporary or

sustained), competitive parity or competitive disadvantages.

Page 45: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

44

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Capability Valuable? Rare? Inimitable? Organisation? Competitive implications

Adapt to changing market

Y N N N Competitive parity

Reconfiguration

Y N N N Competitive parity

Adapt to new customer

preferences

Y N N Y Competitive parity

Environmental sustainability

N Y N Y Competitive parity

Use of technologies

Y N N N Competitive parity

International networks

Y N N Y Temporary competitive advantage

Customer data base

Y N N N Competitive parity

Logistics N N N Y Competitive parity

Strategic alliances N Y Y Y Temporary competitive advantage

Multiple brand commitment

Y Y Y Y Sustained competitive advantage

International experience

Y N N N Competitive advantage

Industrial involvement since

its beginnings

N Y Y N Competitive advantage

Team alignment N Y Y N Competitive advantage

Supplier management

N N N Y Competitive parity

Internal rotation N N N Y Competitive parity

Interdepartmental grouping

N Y N Y Temporary competitive advantage

Marketing skills Y N N N Competitive disadvantage

Figure 24. VRIO

As it can be subtracted from the table above, not all the capabilities considered are

supposed to be competitive advantages for the company.

Page 46: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

45

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

To sum up, most important GM´s capabilities which imply competitive

advantages are the following ones:

1. Multiple brand commitment

2. Team alignment

On the other hand, weakest capabilities which imply competitive disadvantages for

GM compared to competitors’ capabilities are listed below:

1. Marketing skills

2. Reconfiguration

How can we identify the reason why the two first ones are sources of competitive

advantage in opposition to the latest ones?

The answer to this is again the VRIO analysis performed above. As it can be observed,

there is a strong correlation between the number of affirmatives obtained and the

competitive advantage it involves. Besides, it does not seem to be random that the two

first ones that bring competitive advantage are distinctive capabilities and the other two

are not. This can be interpreted as the VRIO being a measure of the uniqueness of our

competences and also an indicator of how these capabilities can help us survive in the

future. However, this fact does not mean that the others are dispensable. In fact, they

might be extremely necessary to guaranty our future sustainability, but they do not mean

a significant advantage against our competitors.

Page 47: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

46

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

ASSIGNMENT 6

VALUE CHAIN

The value chain of GM España represents the activity of manufacturing some

vehicle´s parts and assembling all of them so as to build cars.

First of all, main GM España operational activities should be explained. GM

España is composed by four production modules. Three of these centres are related to

manufacturing whereas the last one refers to the assembly process.

The first centre is dedicated to the pressing process. GM España produces steel

sheets, and shapes them into finally car´s parts, such as the hood, car body, the roof of the

car, and so on.

Besides, there is a second centre or module where different parts, which have been

manufactured by GM España, are welding.

In addition, the third module comprises painting activities. This is the place where

different parts which composed the car (steel sheets and the rest of source-produced parts)

are painted.

Finally, the last centre refers to the assembly process. Not only manufactured parts

are assembled, but also outsourced parts which are distributed to Spain, for example,

plastics parts, wheel, engine, car windows, and so on.

Regarding the information above about the manufacturing process, the value chain

for GM España has been drawn up. The following figure describes the primary and

support activities which composed the value chain of the company.

Then, different primaries and support activities are explained:

Primary activities

Inbound logistics:

- Inputs are distributed in two main hubs. The first one contains roughly 90% of the

overall input and is dedicated to store the required parts for models which are

manufactured at regular production. In other words, it is destined to those models´

components which have already achieved optimal efficiency allowing to reduce

inventory levels to a minimum. The second one stores parts destined to new

models. Those models are still now developing, so as new pieces should be

changed, high levels of inventory are required.

Page 48: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

47

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

- A railway indoor distribution system has been implemented to transport inputs

inside the warehouse. It consists of little trains which distribute and allocate input

parts through its huge facilities.

- Supplier Quality Assurance (SQA). It is a department which is exclusively

dedicated to control the quality of the input parts and raw materials, as they are

crucial for the manufacturing process.

- Supplier´s testing. Suppliers are invited to attend the production plants so as them

to show how their products work and fit in the processing line. In this sense,

suppliers can notice if their parts have the necessary quality or need to be

improved. For example, they can observe if several coating layers should be added

to the final product or if a glue final layer is required.

Operations:

- Pressing process. It is the one which is carried out in the first hub, where steel

sheets are manufactured.

- Welding process. Manufactured pieces are welded in the second center.

- Painting process. Manufactured parts are painted and coating in order to achieve

the final esthetic.

- Assembly process. Outsourced and manufactured parts are assembled so as to

build a car.

- Testing. Not only during the line process because this sort of processes required a

lot of time, but also testing is made once the product has abandoned the line

process.

Outbound logistics:

- Outdoor parking. GM España facilities comprise an outdoor parking so as to keep

cars before they are sent to dealers. This parking does not need to have huge

dimensions because mostly cars are produced to order (following a Just In Time

technique (JIT)).

- Car´s reserve. A small segment of the produced cars are kept in order to show

them in Opel exhibitions.

- Matching. Best finish cars are kept inside the company as a calibration standard.

Marketing and Sales:

- Solid network of dealers.

- Long term contracts with dealers.

- Firm advertising. Opel cars are associated with the German engineering, as an

icon of reliability.

Page 49: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

48

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Services:

- Customization system. An online personalization system allows customers to

customize its own car parts.

- Guarantee. GM España includes a two years guarantee for new vehicles regardless

its kilometer limitation. Moreover, they comprise the repair and replacement of

different parts in an official Opel dealer without any fee.

Support activities:

Infrastructure: including the four processing centers and its indoor warehouses,

the outdoor parking, offices, Figueruelas plant (Zaragoza).

Technology development: GM España is trying to implement highly advanced

technology to the production lines in order to increase productivity and reduce

personnel. For example, windshields are now added by robots instead as part of

the automatic line instead of by workers.

Human Resource Management:

- GM España promotes internship programs so as to renew employees and give

them the opportunity to get to know the business.

- An internal promotion model is implemented. Most of the jobs offered to external

applicants are entry-level. From there, they base their promotion system on

experience and academic background.

Procurement. Some exclusive plastic devices are designed by GM engineers in

Germany and GM España is in charge of bidding the design. This fact increasing

the competition among molding companies.

Page 50: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

49

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

VALUE SYSTEM

In order to observe the interconnection among categories within the organization

which are required to create a car, the value system of the company has been described.

Inbound Logistics Operations Outbound

Logistics

Services Marketing and Sales

Railway

distribution

system

Differentiation

warehouse model

Pressing

Welding

Painting

Assembly

Testing

Outdoor parking

Cars´ reserve

Solid network of

dealers

LT contracts with

dealers

Firm advertising

Customization

system

Guarantee

Infrastructure: 4 processing centers& indoor warehouses, outdoor parking, offices, Figueruelas plant

(Zaragoza).

Technology development: highly advanced technology: robots, automatic lines

Human Resource Management: internship programs, internal promotion

Procurement: bidding manufactured parts

Figure 25. Value chain

Page 51: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

50

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

According to the value system diagram plotted above, the interconnection among

different organizations can be seen. It can be observed that the value chain of the GM

España starts where the suppliers´ value chain finishes. In this sense, the end of GM

España value chain corresponds with the beginning of the dealers´ one.

Moreover, it is figured out that some of the big suppliers such as Volkswagen

(main rival in the Spanish market) and PSA. For instance, Brigstone provides tires to GM

España, Volkswagen and PSA. Additionally, BASF delivers plastic parts to PSA and GM

España.

Strategic implications

Figure 26. Value system

Page 52: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

51

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Regarding strategic implications, it can be observed that if GM España does not

receive required materials or parts on time from its suppliers, production will be stopped.

For this reason, GM España could not be possible to deliver its car on time to dealers, and

as a consequence clients cannot get access to that product.

A possible solution could be reinforcing the long term contracts with those

companies which provide essential parts that few businesses have, with the objective of

production will never stop. On the other hand, another alternative could be diversifying

the number of suppliers which provide common parts or materials that most supplier

companies have. As a result, GM España could classify its suppliers into three levels (A,

B and C) and buy the required materials and parts from the one which offers best quality-

priced pieces. For example, supposing that there are three main suppliers A (60%), B

(30%) and C (%) and A gives GM España the best offer. But next year if supplier C gives

GM España a better offer, it will go to A (70%), so the competition among suppliers is

increased what it benefits to the company.

SWOT ANALYSIS

Strengths

Figure 27. SWOT analysis

Page 53: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

52

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

One of the main strengths General Motors has as a company, is the wide variety

of brand names. It is present in many different countries with different brand names:

Buick, Cadillac, Daewoo, Opel, Chevrolet…. This is a strength because if one of the

subsidiaries has problems, the company as whole will suffer a smaller impact. Besides if

General Motors España has liquidity problems, with the revenue from other subsidiaries

the problem can be solved.

As GM has a worldwide presence, they can export and import their products from

one country to another. This helps GM reduce its costs of production giving them the

ability to be more competitive. In Spain 95% of the vehicles manufactured by GM are

exported to countries such as the UK or France, where the production costs are higher.

This way GM will try to produce their cars and components in countries where production

costs are lower and they will export them.

When customers start looking for a new car, they search for the car companies

they known. That’s why having a good brand name will give the company more potential

clients. GM has a world brand name which will makes them a strong competitor.

As we can see in the graph, GM is one of the car-manufacturers with higher

investment in research and development, with around 7000 million dollars per year. These

research investments are very important because they can improve the quality their

products and reduce their costs.

Figure 28. Investment in R&D

Page 54: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

53

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

In Spain there are 3 vehicle models produced: Opel Corsa, Meriva and Mokka,

but all Opel models are available. General Motors has a very wide range of products,

which helps cover a larger target market.

GM is working on a new alliance with PSA, which will give the company more

efficiency, security and speed, and will reduce their costs. Both companies will work

together so their strengths will be higher and their threats smaller. This gives them a

strategic advantage towards their competitors.

Weaknesses

GM has recently faced some liquidity problems in Europe due to a reduction on

sales of 16%. They have therefore reduced by 20% their production, which affects their

brand image and will certainly reduce their revenues. Employees have faced a reduction

in their working hours and their salaries. This type of problems weakens the company’s

image and must be solved to avoid bankruptcy.

Even if GM has many subsidiaries, most of their revenues come from the sales in

the United States. This could be a problem, because if they have a problem in the United

States it could affect the other subsidiaries.

As we can see in the new TV advert, GM España has had some problems with bad

marketing investments. Being in a very competitive sector such as the car-manufacturing

means there is no place for mistakes. All marketing is very important, and must be done

correctly. GM España’s last commercial has created a bad image of the company in Spain

and sales will be affected for sure.

Being a very vertical integrated Company can be a weakness for GM. If there is a

problem with the production of the components they will have to pay for it and all the

production chain will be affected. The complexity of the distribution channel due to the

exportations can have a negative impact on the company.

As said before, GM has many subsidiaries and this can also be a weakness because

people may know the subsidiary’s name but may not associate them to GM. This brands

are especially difficult to associate to GM as their names differ a lot and have no relation

with the brand name General Motors. This will lower the brand awareness.

Opportunities

Nowadays, people are more aware of the need to reduce gas emission and become

more environmentally friendly. They therefore search for hybrid or electrical cars. GM

has started to research in this sector and the first environmentally friendly cars have been

produced. This a very important advantage as this market will be crucial in several years.

They have created the same car model in two versions, a normal one and one that uses

GLP which pollutes less. GM España has a very big share of this market.

Page 55: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

54

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Furthermore, investment in R&D has made it possible to launch the new models.

This models satisfy the customer’s needs as they can choose how they want their car to

be. As competition is very high It is important to keep updated and to meet the client’s

needs.

Internet is a key factor in this industry. Companies have access to a huge amount

of information, from the customer’s tastes, to opinions of the company or trends. GM

must have a good data analysis department to gain the biggest market share possible.

Moreover, Internet is a good selling point. Clients must be able to see their cars and

customize it before buying it.

GM must reduce their costs as they are one of the companies with a higher

cost/revenue ratio. In order to reduce costs, they must deal with their suppliers to get

economies of scale. This can be done because in this industry the suppliers have a low

negotiation power. They must analyse the market as too adequate the price of their

vehicles to the market demand.

GM has already grown through acquisitions in the past, and it has had good results.

They should continue like this because the company will grow and competitors are

reduced.

Threats

Although global recession periods affect the whole economy, the car

manufacturing business is one of the most affected when people reduce their expenses.

This factor cannot be controlled or predicted and is a great threat for GM.

The fuel prices vary constantly with factors external to GM. When the price

increases the customers start getting interested in electrical car which are cheaper to use

as they use no fuel. When the price of fuel drops customers omit the electrical car and

focus on fuel cars because they are cheaper. This creates a great uncertainty in the sector

and will affect all GM’s subsidiaries.

Laws and regulations are becoming more important every day. This obliges the

companies in the sector to have additional costs. In addition to the laws all GM’s vehicles

must undertake, their factories must also be regulated to obey all the regulations. This

will increase GM’s costs as renovation of the plants and equipment must be done

regularly.

The prices of the raw materials needed to manufacture cars are constantly

fluctuating. This with increase the production cost of GM. An example of this is the price

of the steel in Spain. As we can see in the graph prices vary monthly and this will change

the margins of GM España.

Page 56: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

55

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

Figure 29. Steel price index

As GM España exports 95% of their manufactured vehicles, exchanges rates are

a very important threat. The company must take into account this rates to avoid incurring

into additional costs. This rates change due to factors external to the company, but are a

great threat for them.

Competitors worldwide affect GM España, as much in the country of production

as in the country where they are selling the final product. Nowadays, market such as the

south Korean or the Japanese are increasing their market share, as they offer a high quality

product at a low price. GM España must reduce their costs and margins as much as

possible in order to avoid losing clients.

New technologies are also a threat for GM. Businesses such as car2go in Spain

are a threat for the automobile sector because the population will start using the

application and stop buying cars. In addition, improvements in the public transports in

Spain will decrease the demand for new vehicles.

Page 57: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

56

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

CONCLUSIONS

In this project, we have studied General Motors, putting special attention in GM

España. We have analysed its position, its implementation systems and the decisions the

company takes, affecting the short and the long run. Summarizing, we can see that the

overall GM strategic planning is based in strong principles and values. The decisions they

take seem to be the outcome of studying and understanding the environment that

surrounds the company. This includes an internal and external analysis of the enterprise.

They try to maximize strengths by taking advantage of opportunities and minimize threats

by avoiding risks. We can say that this company looks at the long term, being able to

sacrifice short-term goals in order to accomplish more sustainable objectives. We can say

that they seek to be leaders in the industry they are in, as they state in the vision, but they

also care about doing it respecting their core values. General Motors cares about the

quality of their products and the welfare of the people that works for them.

Page 58: GM PROJECT REPORT

GM: FINAL PROJECT

November 25th 2016

57

STRATEGIC PLANNING

GM: FINAL PROJECT

BIBLIOGRAPHY

http://www.gmsustainability.com/reporting/reports/MEMORIA_DE_RSC_2014.pdf

Ministry statistics and ANFAC.

TFG: “Análisis y Perspectivas de sector de automoción en España”, Loredana Piticariu,

2013/2014, Universidad del País Vasco.

Tesina: “Aportación de la industria del automóvil al crecimiento económico de España e

impacto de las tendencias actuales en el sector”, Marina Bordacheva, 2014/2015,

Universidad de Barcelona.

GM Corporative Social Responsibility report, June 2015.

Slide Share “GM Global Strategy” article.

GM España employees.

http://autoproyecto.com/2014/01/los-fabricantes-de-autos-que-mas-invierten-en-

investigacion.html

https://www.opel.es/content/dam/Opel/Europe/spain/hq/es/02_Experience/MEMORIA_

DE_RSC_GENERAL_MOTORS_ESPA%C3%91A_2014.pdf

http://www.camara.es/relaciones-institucionales/estudios-especificos/indice-de-precios-

de-acero-corrugado-en-espana

http://www.autocasion.com/actualidad/reportajes/que-coches-se-venden-en-espana-con-

autogas-glp-de-fabrica

http://www.elmundo.es/mundodinero/2008/11/12/economia/1226492872.html

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opel