Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

17
Gloream workshop, Paris 2006 Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation and first results Forêt (1),(2) G., Monge (2) J-.L., Menut (2) L., Vautard (3) R., Beekmann (1) M. (1) Laboratoire Inter-universitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA) (2) Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD) (3) Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE)

description

Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project : implementation and first results. Forêt (1),(2) G., Monge (2) J-.L., Menut (2) L., Vautard (3) R., Beekmann (1) M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Page 1: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Setting of an experimental forecast system for air quality at ECMWF in the framework of the GEMS project :

implementation and first results

Forêt(1),(2) G., Monge(2) J-.L., Menut(2) L., Vautard(3) R., Beekmann(1) M.

(1) Laboratoire Inter-universitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA)(2) Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD) (3) Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE)

Page 2: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Context of this work

▪ 3D Chemical Transport Model are now used to assess air pollution from global to urban scales… nevertheless large uncertainties remains: external forcings : emissions, meteorology, chemical boundary conditions representation of dynamics : pollutants dispersion representations of chemical and physical mecanisms (gases and aerosols) numerical representation

▪ Great Potential for increasing CTM performances :

increasing number of teams working on AQ modelling increasing computing capacity multiplication of observations (satellites)

Synergetical approach via integrated projects : GEMS, PROMOTE

Page 3: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

A common will to ameliorate air quality modelling : The GEMS project

Purpose of GEMS (Global and regional Earth-system Monitoring using Satelliteand in-situ data) :

● Global Monitoring system for Greenhouse Gases (GHG)● Global Monitoring system for Reactive Gases (GRG)● Global Monitoring system for Aerosols (AER)● Regional Air-Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (RAQ)

Create a new European system for operationnal global monitoring of Atmospheric chemistry and to produce improved medium-range & short range air-chemistry forecasts.

GEMS sub-projects :

Page 4: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

The GEMS RAQ sub project

▪ Provide, Evaluate NRT forecasts (gases and aerosols) at continental to regional scale, relying on global and regional assimilated fields

▪ Improve existing continental to regional scales air quality models, statistical post-treatment, and explore multi-model ensemble approaches

▪ Use of satellite information for air quality prognoses▪ Impact of the global change on regional air quality▪ European cooperation for data access, skill evaluation and forecasts comparisons▪ Evaluate health impact of air quality and produce dedicated products

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Objectives :

Several AQ model used for sensivity studies and cross-comparison exercices Recommandation for future RAQ modelling systems

Page 5: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

The CHIMERE-GEMS system (1/2)

Starting model version based on the operationnal PREV’AIR platform :(www.prevair.ineris.fr)

GFS/NCEPGlobal meteorological forecasts

MM5Regional meteorological

forecasts

CHIMERERegional CTM

Prognose hourly concentrations : gases (O3, NO2, CO, SO2…)

aerosols (Sulf, Nitrate,…)

EMEP emissions

USGS land use, land cover

LMDZ-INCA (gases)

GOCART (aerosols)

Large scale chemical forcing

from monthly climatology

● gaseous chemistry module● aerosols module● advection, turbulence● dry and wet deposition

http://euler.lmd.polytechnique.fr/chimere/

Page 6: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

The CHIMERE-GEMS system (2/2)

The CHIMERE-GEMS version :

Geographical GEMS domain [35°N-70°N; 15°E-35°W]Horizontal resolution 101x71 cells ; 0.5°x0.5°Vertical resolution 8 levels ; top at 500 hPa

New emission cadaster (from TNO; 6kmx6km over Europe) spring 2007Forecasted boundary chemical fields for gases (GRG) and aerosols (AER) june 2007

Meteorological forcing from Integrated forecasting System (ECMWF) Test over a summer period (2005) Installing an operationnal system at ECMWF

http://euler.lmd.polytechnique.fr/GEMSchimere

Page 7: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Impact of ECMWF meteorological forcing (1/6)

Simulation period : June/July/August 2005

Number of stations :~ 200 stations(urban+rural+peri-urban)

Skill scores of the forecasts for surface ozone daily peaks values (µg.m3)

Bias 3 2.3Cor 0.86 0.86Rms 17.3 17.1

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

GFS IFS

Change of the meteorological forcing in the forecasting system

Global met. frcst GFS (NCEP) (1°x1°)

Regio. met. frcst MM5 (0.5°x0.5°)

Regio. Chem. rcstCHIMERE-GEMS

Global met. frcst IFS (ECMWF) (0.5°x0.5°)

Regional chem. frcstCHIMERE-GEMS

Page 8: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

bias rms

Impact of ECMWF meteorological forcing (2/6)

correlation

Page 9: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Example of ozone surface peaks time-series :

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Impact of ECMWF meteorological forcing (3/6)

Page 10: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

GFS meteorological forcing IFS meteorological forcing

[Number of simulated ozone peaks (> 180 µg.m-3) / number of observated peaks ] x 100

● blacks circles shows stations without peaks values above 180 µg.m-3

Impact of ECMWF meteorological forcing (4/6)

Page 11: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

GFS meteorological forcing

GFS meteorological forcing

IFS meteorological forcing

IFS meteorological forcing

Number of forecasted but not observed peaks : False alert

Number of « well » forecasted peaks : correct alert

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Impact of ECMWF meteorological forcing (5/6)

Page 12: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Test ECMWF meteorological forcing for summer 2005 (6/6)

Exploratory analysis of differences between both meteorological forcings example of monthly mean differences maps (July 2005)

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

2m Temperature (°C)Wind module (m/s)

Friction velocity (u*; cm/s) Relative humidity (%)[varIFS-varGFS]

Page 13: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Devellopment of a new experimental forecast system based at ECMWF

Simulation period : July/August 2006

Number of stations :~ 200 stations(urban+rural+peri-urban)

Skill scores of the forecasts for daily peaks values (µg.m3)

Bias -1.1 -7.0Cor 0.89 0.89Rms 17.1 18.4

GFS IFS

What’s new ? New parallel version of CHIMERE is used The whole system is running remotely on ECMWF’s calculator (HPCD)

IFS (ECMWF) (0.5°x 0.5°)

CHIMERE-GEMS(parallel version)

120 h IFS forecast available

Timing (D-1) 6h30 pm (UT) (D-1) 9 pm (UT)

Beginning of the CHIMERE run on hpcd

(D-1) 9h45 pm (UT)

Chemical forecasts areAvailable (Day + 3)

Page 14: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Experimental forecast for summer 2006 at ECMWF

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Simulated surface ozone peaks for the 2006/07/26

NCEP/MM5/CHIMERE ECMWF/CHIMERE-GEMS

Page 15: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Gloream workshop, Paris 2006

Future works

Identifying main differences for the 2 differents meteorological forcings

increasing horizontal resolution of the model (parallel version)

Tests with the new TNO emission cadaster Sensivity tests to chemical boundary conditions forcings : differences between monthly global climatology and global chemical forecasts currently in test with LMDZ-INCA chemical forecasts

+ Implementation of the new model version : (spring 2007 ???) enhanced aerosol modules deep convection free-tropospheric version coupling with chimere-dust version better dust forcing …

Page 16: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006
Page 17: Gloream workshop, Paris 2006