Global outlook for the RoRo market · 19. Vessel size trends: ro-pax & freight only • charter...

26
Global outlook for the RoRo market Mike Garratt and Antonella Teodoro Ro-ro Shipping conference 20 – 21 st February 2014, Gothenburg 213059_presentation_v13

Transcript of Global outlook for the RoRo market · 19. Vessel size trends: ro-pax & freight only • charter...

  • Global outlook for the RoRo market

    Mike Garratt and Antonella Teodoro Ro-ro Shipping conference

    20 – 21st February 2014, Gothenburg

    213059_presentation_v13

  • 1. The paper will consider

    • Intra European trade from a global perspective

    • The European unitised and auto markets

    • Trade and fleet deployment by corridor

    • Public policy and case for longer routes

    • A potential way forward

  • 2. Overall world trade in 2013 • Estimated global trade for international tonnes grew 3.5%

    – approaching the long run growth rate of the last 15 years (5.1% per annum)

    • Global containerised trade (TEU) grew by 4.9%

    – less than the (15 year) long term growth rate of 5.8%

    – but an improvement on almost no growth in 2012

    • Intra European & Med. trades grew 4.0%

    – faster than than deep-sea imports at 2.9%

    – a key indicator for the ro-ro sector

  • 3. Global trade, unitised tones

    • Far East penetration of European markets slowing • a positive development for intra-European ro-ro trades

    Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

  • 4. Market growth shifting eastwards

    Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

    Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

    Imports

    Exports

  • 5. Intra European trade: unitised tonnes

    • Intra European recovery focussed in Eastern Europe/Eastern Mediterranean

    • Important for ro-ro to identify strong role in these markets

    Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014) Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

  • Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

    • Food goods recovering: CAGR 4% between 2008-2013 - more protected against deep-sea competition • Consumer and industrial goods lagging behind

    6. Intra European trades: unitised tonnes by commodity group

  • 7. Auto trade (tonnes) index 1996=100

    Source: MDST World Cargo Database (WCD, v. 14.01.2014)

    Auto trades have actually reversed direction of trade: • Global & intra-Europe

    volumes now > 2008 • Decline in imports to N

    America and Europe • Fastest growth in

    European exports - now > imports • Growth in exports

    crucial for a fleet as 90% of 2.7m car fleet capacity in > 3,000 car vessels.

    m Tonnes

    Year Global (excl.

    intra) Europe & Med

    IMP (excl. intra) N America Imp

    (excl. intra) Intra Europe &

    Med Europe & Med

    EXP (excl. intra)

    2008 19.8 6.2 5.8 14.5 3.5

    2013 20.1 3.8 5.1 16.8 5.6

    2020 24.5 4.7 5.2 19.7 7.2

    CAGR 2008-13 0.3% -9.2% -2.3% 3.1% 9.9%

    CAGR 2013-20 2.9% 3.1% 0.1% 2.3% 3.7%

  • 8. Corridors ranked by tonnes moved and value added

    m tonnes lane metres of ship per m tonnes

    rank

    1. British Isles – Near Continent: 41 (28%) 3465 10

    2. Scandinavia – Continent: 34 (23%) 3619 9

    3. GB – Ireland: 11 4452 8

    4. Italy – Greece – Turkey: 10 5887 7

    5. Scandinavia – Finland/Baltic S/Russia 7 10932 3

    6. Benelux - Baltic/Scandinavia 7 7725 5

    7. British Isles – Scandinavia/Baltic 6 10077 4

    8. Iberia – British Isles/North Sea 3 8137 6

    9. Europe – North Africa (West Med) 3 33894 2

    10. Iberia – East Med 1 61540 1

    Others 22

    Total 145

    • Shortest routes carry most cargo but add least value

  • 9. Short-distance corridors (2012)

    1: British Isles with France/Benelux Proportion accompanied: 61% LOW Lane Metres per million tonnes: 3,465 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 3.2%

    2: Denmark/Germany/Poland and Scandinavia Proportion accompanied: 64% LOW Lane Metres per million tonnes: 3,619 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 1.9%

    3: UK and Ireland Proportion accompanied: 80% LOW Lane Metres per million tonnes : 4,452 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 2.5%

    Scope to expand roro share

  • 10. Longer distance corridors (2012)

    4: Italy/Greece/Turkey Proportion accompanied: 75% MEDIUM Lane Metres per million tonnes: 5,887 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 2.2%

    5: Finland/Baltic S/Russia to/from Norway/Sweden Proportion accompanied: 80% LOW Lane Metres per million tonnes : 10,932 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 2.1%

    6: Benelux to Baltic/Scandinavia Proportion accompanied: 22% HIGH Lane Metres per million tonnes: 7,725 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 2.9%

    Scope to expand roro share

  • 11. Long distance corridors (2012) 7: Baltic/ Scandinavia to/from British Isles Proportion accompanied: 10% MEDIUM Lane Metres per million tonnes: 10,077 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 1.8%

    8: Iberia to/from British Isles/North Sea Proportion accompanied: 85% HIGH Lane Metres per million tonnes: 8,137 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 3.1%

    9: France/Italy/Spain to/from N Africa Proportion accompanied: 62% MEDIUM Lane Metres per million tonnes: 33,894 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 2.3%

    10: Iberia/France to/from Black Sea Proportion accompanied: 81% HIGH Lane Metres per million tonnes: 61,540 Forecast growth p.a. to 2020: 3.1%

    Scope to expand roro share

  • 12. RoRo tonnes by type and area

    - Highest current ro-ro tonnages on short (accompanied) routes

    - low lane metres (low value added)/tonne carried

    - RoRo becoming stronger in Eastern Mediterranean

    - an area of high growth

    - on longer crossings with higher lane metres/tonne carried

    Source: MDST elaborations on Eurostat (v. August 2013)

    Corridor 1 - English Isl. to/from France/Benelux Corridor 2 - Denmark/Germany/Poland to/from Scandinavia Corridor 3 - UK to/from Ireland Corridor 4 - Italy/Greece/Turkey Corridor 5 - Finland/Baltic States & Russia to/from Norway/Sweden Corridor 6 - Benelux to/from Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic/Scand./Russia Corridor 7 - Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic States/Scandinavia to/from English Isl. Corridor 8 - Iberia to/from France/English Isl./Benelux Corridor 9 - France/Italy/Spain to/from N Africa Corridor 10 - Iberia/France to/from Black Sea

  • 13. Estimating ro-ro growth to 2020

    Source: MDST elaborations on Eurostat (v. August 2013)

    Corridor 1 - English Isl. to/from France/Benelux Corridor 2 - Denmark/Germany/Poland to/from Scandinavia Corridor 3 - UK to/from Ireland Corridor 4 - Italy/Greece/Turkey Corridor 5 - Finland/Baltic States & Russia to/from Norway/Sweden Corridor 6 - Benelux to/from Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic/Scand./Russia Corridor 7 - Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic States/Scandinavia to/from English Isl. Corridor 8 - Iberia to/from France/English Isl./Benelux Corridor 9 - France/Italy/Spain to/from N Africa Corridor 10 - Iberia/France to/from Black Sea

    Overall annual growth of just 2-3% if share retained SECA threatens to reduce that growth Switch to longer routes offers growth potential if fuel costs solved

  • • Range of studies 2009-12 confirmed ‘0.1%’ emissions rule transfers cargo from sea to road/rail – reducing market for ships’ capacity >10%

    • Extension of SECA to Mediterranean and Irish Sea likely

    • Rail freight liberalization a further threat to longer haul services

    • Ro-ro industry lacked coherent strategy in addressing SECA: – initial denial that any viable technology available

    – a hope that EU would back-down

    – then the conclusions by some that scrubbers could work proving policy makers ‘right’ to dis-believe a reluctant industry

    – others have found chosen methanol cost effective

    – now realization LNG can even be retro-fitted!

    • But cost effective further investment implies larger ships and further industrial concentration in a stagnant market

    • Increased concentration implies continuing ‘competition’ issues

    14. SECA challenge

  • 15. Vessel deployment by corridor

    • Three largest ro-ro corridors employ relatively few ships

    – 72% intra-European ro-ro tonnes carried employ only 45% of fleet capacity

    • ‘SECA’ impact will reinforce this pattern to concentre few ships on short crossings unless industry structure changes

    • Stagnant vessel supply informed by declining charter rates is failing to renew the industry

    – which will reduce its cost effectiveness and scope for innovation

    • Points towards determining how to engage with State institutions to mutual advantage

  • • No. of vessels deployed in Europe & Med estimated to have fallen by 8.1% between 2006 and 2014

    • While lane metres has increased:

    +7.4% in N. Europe

    +5.0% in Mediterranean

    16. Fleet & vessels development in Europe & Mediterranean

    Source: MDST Databank (WCD, v. Jan.2014) Source: MDST Databank (WCD, v. Jan.2014)

  • 17. Vessel deployment by geography (2006 – 2014)

    Corridor 1 - English Isl. to/from France/Benelux Corridor 2 - Denmark/Germany/Poland to/from Scandinavia Corridor 3 - UK to/from Ireland Corridor 4 - Italy/Greece/Turkey Corridor 5 - Finland/Baltic States & Russia to/from Norway/Sweden Corridor 6 - Benelux to/from Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic/Scand./Russia Corridor 7 - Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic States/Scandinavia to/from English Isl. Corridor 8 - Iberia to/from France/English Isl./Benelux Corridor 9 - France/Italy/Spain to/from N Africa Corridor 10 - Iberia/France to/from Black Sea

    Deployed service capacity matches demand Source: MDST Databank (WCD, v. Jan.2014) Source: MDST elaborations on Eurostat (v. August 2013)

  • Corridor 1 - English Isl. to/from France/Benelux Corridor 2 - Denmark/Germany/Poland to/from Scandinavia Corridor 3 - UK to/from Ireland Corridor 4 - Italy/Greece/Turkey Corridor 5 - Finland/Baltic States & Russia to/from Norway/Sweden Corridor 6 - Benelux to/from Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic/Scand./Russia Corridor 7 - Denmark/Germany/Poland/Baltic States/Scandinavia to/from English Isl. Corridor 8 - Iberia to/from France/English Isl./Benelux Corridor 9 - France/Italy/Spain to/from N Africa Corridor 10 - Iberia/France to/from Black Sea

    But most fleet capacity employed on the longer routes

    18. Fleet capacity by corridor

    Source: MDST Databank (WCD, v. Jan.2014) Source: MDST elaborations on Eurostat (v. August 2013)

  • 19. Vessel size trends: ro-pax & freight only

    • charter market continuing to deteriorate for smaller vessels

    • number of smaller ships therefore decline, replaced by larger ones

    • increasing concentration and making start ups more difficult.

    Source: MDST Databank (WCD, v. Jan.2014)

  • 20. Ro-ro role in intra European trade 2012

    • Total cross-border intra-European non-bulk trade approximately 714 million tonnes (maritime + non maritime)

    • Intra-European by sea (exc. feeders) was 190m tonnes (27%)

    • Volume by ro-ro: 146m tonnes

    – ro-ro therefore 75% of all intra-European maritime trade

    – ro-ro 20% of total intra-European cross-border non-bulk freight moved

    • Tonnages similar to all cross-border rail freight (190m tonnes inc bulks)

    • Yet ro-ro tonnages almost invisible to policy makers…port data collected but not interpreted as intra-European trade by sea….a gap to be filled!

    • NEVER expressed in terms of tonne kms.

  • 21. Challenges and opportunities for the ro-ro industry • Ro-ro industry developed in the 1970's to

    – capitalise on European economic integration

    – partner with emerging international hauliers

    – opportunistically by-pass ports with outdated practices

    • Its success was based upon offering a radical solution in rapidly changing circumstances

    • Its failure to continue to expand to compete with inland modes can be explained by – rising energy prices

    – decline in Western European industrial competitiveness

    – being in competition with its own clients (international hauliers)

    • Switching traffic from short crossing to long crossing services represents easiest opportunity to expand its market

  • 22. Policy context • A broad European policy of co-modality

    - to use the mode that minimises a wide definition of costs

    - to allow public sector intervention where market distortion

    • Longer distance ro-ro container ships offer lower costs per tonne km than overland haulage

    - yet the only grant system designed to intervene suspended (Marco Polo) as it did not convince policy makers

    - Motorways of the Sea to encourage switching by accompanied trucks is not environmentally efficient

    - road pricing has stalled (French eco-tax blocked by civil unrest!)

    • Health arguments so strong low sulphur rules likely to be extended.

    - similar impacts to be expected with Mediterranean

    • In the deep-sea sector regulators may be forced to accept scale advantages of increasing concentration outweigh threats of anti-competitive action (P3 etc)

    Do similar opportunities exist in this sector?

  • 23. A potential way forward

    • Develop as a door-to-door industry, marketing to shippers

    • Form relationships with ports with strong hinterlands rather than with transit ports – to minimise inland costs, integrating with distribution centres

    • Present policy makers with: – coherent statistics to explain the industry’s present role

    – an explanation of the advantages of scale and networks

    – a proposed system of public sector support NOT based on opportunistic grant applications to maintain uneconomic services

    – consider how collaboration could help to exploit LNG’s potential to reduce costs of longer crossings

    • Focus on ro-ro's principle advantages – rapid handling

    – ability to carry a wide range of cargo on the same ship

  • 24. In Summary

    • Market conditions improving as (most of the) European economy recovers

    • But steady state forecast growth of only 2-3% per annum in medium term

    • Currently continuing concentration of short crossings which employ too few ships

    • Opportunity to expand market share through extending lengths of crossings – requiring pan-industry evidence to investors and public policy

    makers

    – exploiting LNG to reduce incremental costs/mile

    • But SECA episode demonstrates failure of the industry to yet present a convincing case to political decision makers

  • Thank you!

    [email protected]