Possible ILM delivery models

ILM delivery models

Pros:

- Cost decrease

- Long term partnership building (venue, visa, logistics, airlines).

- Inclusiveness of plenary (cross-selling).

- Expertise (efficiency, less HR, legal reality).

- Stability

- Focus on content instead of logistics (AI, Global plenary, MC).

- Building of brand.

- Decrease risks and risk management resources.

- Upselling products/product development.

- Eliminate need for resources to be put for allocation and management/preparation/workload.

Cons

- Huge responsibility and accountability

over conference for an entity

- 1 location

- Talent drain of entity/native speakers

- Transition period from current model to

the other

- Structures/accountability systems

Examples:

WEF/Davos, Switzerland

UN General Assembly/ NY,

Several AIESEC entities have the same

venue for their biggest conferences (i.e.

Greece, Germany)

Model 1: Same Location for every IC

1 location

International CC/ participating entities

Global Brand

Travel cost sharing evolve for all entities

Representation and showcasing of diversity of network is enforced.

ILM delivery modelsModel 2: Rotation System between 3 venues in different regions

Pros

- Rotation gives an equal financial pressure for regions

- Rely on strong ext. factors

- Knowledge management through repeating entities

- Use strong and objective internal factors

- Objective decision making

- Still open to more entities (IPM)

- More focused approach of entities.

Cons

- Rotation if one region can’t host.

- How objective do we want to go.

- Need to have 2 entities on the list per region.

Criteria for entities

1. External factors: venues, logistics, safety, visa, political situation, stability.

Then a list of potential entities will be provided.

2. Internal factors: HR Capacity, finance capacity, conference XP.

Regional rotation: IC – 123, IPM 312

Decision making:

- Listed entities of one region based on rotation bid.

- Filter based on internal factors – objectives algorithm, strong variables.

- Filter gives us priority list.

1. AMERICAS 2. MIDDLE EAST, EUROPE,

AFRICA

3. ASIA PACIFIC

ILM delivery modelsModel 3: Open for all entities with new criteria

1. Eligible entity list by ILM Board based on external factors:a. Political/safety/health

b. 3-5 venues that can host IC/IPM

c. Letter of intent from partners (2-3)

d. Visa

e. Country cost/inflation

f. Market analysis.

2. Bidding process based on internal factors:- HR capacity

- Financial capacity

- Conference XP

- Previous performance

- Reserves

- Partnerships

3. The M&BSC will make evaluation based on criteria and select the entity that fulfills minimum standards. In case of 2 entities fulfilling minimum standards, the global plenary will vote on those 2.