Gino sa distribution management channel
-
Upload
sameer-mathur -
Category
Documents
-
view
68 -
download
4
Transcript of Gino sa distribution management channel
GINO SA : Distribution Channel Management
Case analysis
A.Tejitha ReddyIIT Hyderabad
Present situation
Gino SA is one of the largest burner manufacturers and
exporters in the world and enjoys up to 14% market share with its product
mix. It officially set up its Beijing office in 1995.It was carrying 95% of its sales only through 3 major distributors in
China
Major Distributors in China
•Wayip Trading Co.
• Jinghua Mechanical Engineering Company
•FUNG’s Co
Market
SegmentationDomestic
boilers
Commercial Boilers
Industrial Boilers
Current Situation
Feima ,one of the largest OEM’s
in China which is currently being
supplied Gino products by
Jinghua approached Zhou, China
marketing manager of Gino SA
for permission to buy burners
directly from Gino
Current situation
The current issue is Choice between Feima’s OEM businesses, which may lead to frayed relationship
with existing distributors in China and leaving Feima as Jinghua’s company.
problem
Solution 1
Reject Feima’s offer
Good relationship with Jinghua and other distributors.
Feima's relationship can get affected which may lead to feima approaching Gino’s competitors.
Bargaining power of distributor will become difficult to control.
Solution 2
Offer the discounts
to Feima through Jinghua
Good relationship with the Jinghua and other distributors.
Continuation of the existing relation with feima
No increase in sales to feima.
Other distributor’s OEM accounts will ask for same margin
No step towards long term goal
Solution 3
Accept Feima’s offer
Initiation to OEM accounts for Gino in China
Increased purchase of Gino Burners by Feima
A way to combat the increasing bargaining power of distributors
Reconsideration of Jinghua’s co-operation with Gino
Threat to relationship with other major distributors.
All the above alternatives have so many risks which
may effect the revenue and Gino’s position in China to
a very great extent and put the relationship with either distributors or
consumers at stake. So we need to think of another
alternative method where both Jinghua and Feima are
satisfied
Solution 4
Accept Feima’s offer for Industrial segment and leave other segments to Jinghua.
Tables from the case : Gino SA : Distribution channel management
Segment Average cost of
burner(RMD)
% contribution of revenue
Domestic 2500 20
Commercial 9000 25
Industrial 65000 30
In case Gino and Feima sign a pact the Feima promised to purchase at least 50% of its commercial and industrial burners and all its domestic burners from Gino. Then from the above tables Gino’s sales in China would become:
Segment Previous Gino sales
Addition due to
Industrial growth
Addition Due to Feima
Total
Domestic 10887 218 11105 705 11810
Commercial
1877 94 1971 32 2003
Industrial 137 28 165 33 198
Estimated Annual sales
Domestic Commercial Industrial
No of units 11105 1971 165
Price per unit of burner
2500 9000 65000
Revenue from burners
27762500 17739000 10725000
Revenue from spares
6940625 4434759 2681250
Total Revenue 34703125 22173750 13406250
Contribution to Gino
6940625 5543437.50 4021875
Total Revenue to Gino: 16505937.5 RMD that is $1988667.17
•All revenues are in terms of RMD unless specified.
Numerical Analysis Considering Solution:1
Domestic Commercial Industrial Industrial directly sold
No of units 11810 2003 165 36
Price per unit of burner
2500 9000 65000 58500*
Revenue from burners
29525000 18027000 10725000 2106000
Revenue from spares
7381250 4506750 2681250 526500
Total Revenue 36906250 22533750 13406250 2632500
Contribution to Gino
7381250 5633437.50 4021875 787950
• *- considering that extra 10% discount• All revenues are in terms of RMD unless specified.
Total Revenue to Gino: 17826312.50 RMD that is $2147748.5
Numerical Analysis Considering Solution:4
Even from Numerical analysis we see that solution 4 is more profitable compared to solution 1.This implies it is also profitable compared to solution 2(since solution 2 offers more discount compared to 1).Thus comparing all the pros and cons, achievement of Gino’s long term goals and also the profit in all casesSolution 4 is preferred. The extra revenue could be used for setting up a Gino warehouse in Shangai.
conclusion
Feima would be happy about the deal as it is getting the percentage discount it
demanded and in addition ,due to setting up of warehouse, delivery of burners would be
faster
Implementation
Jinghua could be convinced , since at the cost of losing some industrial burners Jinghua was increasing its profits in both domestic and commercial
segments. Moreover setting up of a warehouse would reduce its
transportation costs.
Implementation
Disclaimer:Created by
Tejitha Reddy Ajjuguttu, IIT Hyderabad,
during an internship by Prof. Sameer Mathur, IIM Lucknow.
www.IIMInternship.com
Contents:Gino SA:Distribution Channel Management