Venous Thromboembolism (VTE): Recent Advances in Reducing the Disease Burden
Getting Started on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Travis Dollak Improvement Advisor WHA 1.
-
Upload
alannah-arnold -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Getting Started on Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Travis Dollak Improvement Advisor WHA 1.
Getting Started onVenous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Travis DollakImprovement Advisor
WHA
1
Today’s Call
1) Our Timeline and Process2) Review Questions from Kick-Off 3) Measures (Q&A)4) Next 30 Days
A. View Science of Safety VideoB. Organizing the Team
2
VTE Facts• Pulmonary Embolus resulting from DVT is the most
common cause of preventable hospital death• The risk for developing VTE varies between 10-85%
(depending on reason for admission)• The rate of fatal pulmonary embolus more than
doubles between the ages of 50 and 80
• If Wisconsin prevents 125 DVTs in the next two years we will save our state $1.9 million (~$15K/instance)
http://www.hret-hen.org/images/downloads/508changepacks/vte_change%20package_508.pdf
Initiative Timeline Overview• 9 Month Collaborative• 1-Hr Webinar Each Month – 2nd Wednesday of Each Month 12:00-1:00 PM
4
5
DRIVER DIAGRAM
6
DRIVER DIAGRAM continued
Poll Question #1: What have you tried?Which of the following describes your facility best
in terms of progress on this initiative?
a) This is the first time we have worked on it b)We have worked on it in the past but feel we
have regressedc) We have really nailed it and are putting the
finishing touches on the programd)We have all but given up on finding ways to
improve
7
Initiative Learning ProcessWebinars
• Review progress of last 30 days• New content• Discussion and sharing• Plan for the next 30 days
Discussion Group• Questions• Peer-to-Peer Sharing
Quality Center• Data submissions• References and Toolkits• Reports (coming soon)
Learning Opportunities
Webinars
Discussion Group
WHA Quality Center
Site Visits
8
Theory of Constraints
Reasons Improvement Projects May Have ‘Failed’ in the Past:
•Moved too fast to ‘Protocol and Procedure’ •Did not have the right people involved – engaging frontline staff•Used the same core group of people to fix the problem•Measures were not monitored consistently over time•Did not reinforce training on the new way of doing things•Participants in the initiative do not address the root causes of performance deficiency
9
Poll Question #1: ResultsWhich of the following describes your facility best
in terms of progress on this initiative?
a) This is the first time we have worked on it b)We have worked on it in the past but feel we
have regressedc) We have really nailed it and are putting the
finishing touches on the programd)We have all but given up on finding ways to
improve
10
How we will overcome the Constraints• Slow down the improvement train• Continuous measurement throughout initiative
(and beyond)• Get the right people involved• Get new people involved• Small tests of change with many front-line staff• Opportunities to revisit training• Focus on project sustainability
11
Findings from Kick-Off Meeting
Follow-up from Post-Its on Quality Center Discussion Group• Concerns• Questions• Something to Share
12
http://www.whaqualitycenter.org/PartnersforPatients/VenousThromboembolism/VTEDiscussionGroup.aspx
Importance of MeasurementWhy process measures? The purpose of measurement in QI work is
for learning not judgment!
Measures should be used to guide improvement and test changes.
Demonstrate change from a baseline, or initial measurement, and assess the degree of change after an intervention.
I think we improved… but I’m not sure by
how much?
13
Outcome Measure: Focus on the customer or patient. What is the end result?
VTE Outcome Measure: Incidence of hospital-acquired VTE (# of VTE per 100 admissions)
VTE Outcome Measure
14
VTE Process Measures
15
Process Measures: Focus on the workings of the system. Are the parts/steps in the system performing as planned?
VTE Process Measures:Completion of a risk assessment on admission using risk assessment toolOrPrevalence of appropriate prophylaxis (educational, pharmacological, mechanical)
Action Item #1 – Data Submission
Baseline outcome data due June 30th
• Submit via WHA Quality Center Portalo 2011 Data Aggregate (if available) and/oro 2012 Data Monthly (if available)
• Analyze baseline data
16
http://www.whaqualitycenter.org/PartnersforPatients/VenousThromboembolism/VTEDataSubmission.aspx
Plan for the Next 30 Days
1. Science of Safety
2. Organizing the Team
17
Poll Question #2: Where are you at?
Which of the following best describes your progress on this initiative?
a) Team formed – AIM statement – Held first team meeting -- Analyzing interventions
b) Team formed – AIM Statement -- Held first team meeting
c) Team formed -- AIM Statement d) Team formed e) Just starting
18
19
The Swiss Cheese Model – by James Reason
Science of Safety – How Errors Happen
How Can These Errors Happen?• People are fallible• Medicine is still treated as an art, not a
science• Systems do not catch mistakes before they
reach the patient
20
Why do mistakes happen?• Variability based on patient
type• Complexity• Inability to connect risk
assessment with care plan• Human error• Tight time constraints• Inadequate tools (protocols,
policies, supplies)
• Fatigue• Inattention/distraction• Unfamiliar situations/new
problem• Communication errors• Using past solutions
21
Process Factors People Factors
Seven Concepts of Patient Safety
# CONCEPT VTE SPECIFIC1 Use-Centered Design (staff
providing care) • Make things visible
Simplified screening tool
2 Avoid Reliance on Memory Vigilance• Provide checklists, flags or alarms as reminders
Use a flow sheet that follows the patient through the transitions of care
3 Involve Patients in Their Care• Teach back
Educate patients and families on risk of bleeding or early signs of VTE
22
Seven Concepts of Patient Safety# CONCEPT HAC SPECIFIC4 Anticipate the Unexpected Have pharmacists perform
independent double checks on prophylaxis orders
5 Build in Redundancy• Assume errors will occur and build a system to accommodate
Have pharmacists perform concurrent review of all “opt-outs”
6 Hardcode Your System (process, training, culture)
Utilize frontline clinicians as “first responders” for over/under coagulation
7 Improve Access to Timely Data• Data walls
Make results easily available and visible to all. Post run charts at stations.
23
Science of Safety Recipe
• Educate on the Science of Safety• Identify Defects (Staff safety assessment)• Learn from Defects• Implement Teamwork, Communication Tools,
A standardized process
24
Action Item # 2 – View Patient Safety Video
Create a roster of who on your team/unit needs to view the Science of Safety video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOJJHHm7lnM&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL048D28C888FE3871
25
Organizing your TeamConsiderations– Who will you involve?– How will you communication?• Within your team? (notify of meetings)• To others outside of thee team?
– How will you use the webinars? (use as weekly meeting?)
– Identify team structure (key roles, expertise, leaders)– How will you keep everyone engaged?
26
Poll Question #2: Results Which of the following best describes your progress
on this initiative?a) Team formed – AIM statement – Held first team
meeting -- Analyzing interventions b)Team formed – AIM Statement -- Held first team
meetingc) Team formed -- AIM Statement d)Team formed e)Just starting
27
Action Item #3 - Organizing your TeamOptional Tools to Use
Agenda Team Charter
28
Guide to Quality Centerhttp://www.whaqualitycenter.org/
Click Here
29
The Next 30 Days
Tools Available On WHA Quality Center:• Science of Safety Video Link• Meeting Agenda (pre-populated)• Team Charter• VTE References and Toolkits
ACTION ITEMSSubmit Baseline Data
View Science of Safety Video
Hold an initiative team meeting
Review Resources in Quality Center
30
Questions?
31
Reminders:• Please complete the 3 question survey when you
close the webinar window.• Mid-month reminder email• Next Month begin the Model for Improvement