Getting past the Google search box: employing screencasts in library information training Assumpta...
-
Upload
meagan-hall -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Getting past the Google search box: employing screencasts in library information training Assumpta...
Getting past the Google search box: employing screencasts in
library information training
Assumpta ByrneAthlone Institute of Technology
User education in AIT library• Librarians provide information sessions to
students which include:– Outline of information sources in a lecture style– Live search of the information sources by
staff/students– Information sources demonstrated are usually the
expensive subscription databases
• Supplementary information on library website e.g. subject guides, database search tips in a static format.
Search strategy concept• No supplementary online material yet
giving demonstration/overview of a search strategy creation, i.e. how to think outside the project title and use alternate keywords and Boolean logic to find information
• Camtasia had already been used to create a demo of a library record login.
Creating the screencast – location choices and problems
Search the information source
• Databases located on library website and searched using synonyms and Boolean operators.
• Demonstrated that typing in the title rather than phrases finds less results so alternate keywords use highlighted again at end of screencast.
Student feedback – pilot groupQuestions:
1. If your lecturer gives you an assignment, where would you go to get information?
2. What is the title of a current assignment you have?
3. If you use the computer/Internet to get information for this assignment, what are you going to put in the search box?
New question 1
1. (a) If your lecturer gives you an assignment, where would you go to get information?
(b) If your answer to 1.(a) included “the Internet”, please name the site(s)
Student research
• Questionnaire handed out to students at the end of information sessions before screencast was available.
• Same questionnaire handed out to different student groups who had attended an information session which included the screencast.
Questionnaire results 1(a) – information sources
Information sources
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Without video
With video
Questionnaire results – both groups – information sources
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Year 4 &
Masters
Library/books 35.71% 44.00% 27.37% 42.04%
Internet 38.10% 36.00% 42.11% 38.22%
Library website 13.49% 6.40% 12.63% 5.73%
Journals/Newspapers/Publications/Theses/Previous Assignments 5.56% 8.00% 6.32% 6.37%
Class notes/Moodle/supervisor 4.76% 3.20% 3.16% 3.82%
Workplace/Companies/Contacts/Local sources 0.79% 1.60% 3.16% 3.18%
Databases 0.79% 0.80% 3.16% 0.00%
Other third level institutes 0.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Government services 0.00% 0.00% 2.11% 0.64%
Questionnaire results – 1(b) web addresses
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
Compa
nies
Datab
ases
Goo
gle/S
chola
r
Gov
ernm
ent s
ervic
es/Dep
artm
ents
Libr
ary w
ebsit
e
Moo
dle
Oth
er se
arch
eng
ines
Relev
ant o
rganis
ation
s/web
sites
reco
mm
ende
...
Wiki
pedi
a
Without video
With video
Traditional information session
Information session with screencast
Information source
Library website 14.99% 15.9%
Databases 4.94% 5.34%
Search strategy
Title search 56% 58%
Keyword/phrase search
44% 42%
Summarised changes following screencast viewing
Future work
• Short questionnaire for first years at induction to assess information sources
• Screencasting– Videos for other schools– Live database search – overcome network
issues– Web OPAC usability study
Conclusions
• Slightly higher awareness of sources but not search strategy
• Reliance on Internet (Google) search box
• Collaboration between academic and library staff necessary
• Information literacy on syllabus??
Questions