Gerdenitsch eawop

13
When freedom becomes duty: The role of perceived control in flexible working arrangements Cornelia Gerdenitsch Bettina Kubicek Christian Korunka

Transcript of Gerdenitsch eawop

Page 1: Gerdenitsch eawop

When freedom becomes duty:The role of perceived control

in flexible working arrangements

Cornelia Gerdenitsch

Bettina Kubicek

Christian Korunka

Page 2: Gerdenitsch eawop

Change in Working Conditions: Flexible Working

• Temporal flexibility: autonomy in deciding when to work

• Spatial flexibility: various options to work at (on the move, cafés, coworking spaces, hot-desking)

theoretical background.

(Medialia & Jacobs, 2008; ten Brummelhuis, Bakker, Hetland & Jeulemans, 2012; Demerouti, Derks, ten Brummelhuis, Bakker, in press) 2

Page 3: Gerdenitsch eawop

Change in Working Conditions: Flexible Working

• One enabler: Information- and Communication Technologies (“New Ways of Working” concept; Baarne, Houtkamp, & Knotter, 2010)

(Medialia & Jacobs, 2008; ten Brummelhuis, Bakker, Hetland & Jeulemans, 2012; Demerouti, Derks, ten Brummelhuis, Bakker, in press)

How do Digital Natives (Prensky,

2001) appraise temporal and spatial flexibility at their work?

3

theoretical background.

Page 4: Gerdenitsch eawop

Flexible Working Arrangements: Ambiguous Consequences

4

• Job satisfaction(Baruch, 2000; Gajendran & Harrison 2007)

• Engagement (ten Brummelhuis et al., 2012)

• Organisational commitment (Bond & Galinsky 2006)

• Work non-work balance (Byron, 2005)

PROS CONS

• Workload and time pressure(Kelliher & Anderson, 2010)

• Work non-work conflict (Anderson, Coffey, Byerly, 2002)

• Permanent connection to work(Diaz et al., 2012)

• Interruptions (Spiegelman & Destky, 2008)

(Demerouti, Derks, ten Brummelhuis, & Bakker, in press)

theoretical background.

Page 5: Gerdenitsch eawop

Control in flexible working arrangements

• Dichotomous structure of flexibility

– Temporal autonomy vs. temporal restriction (Kattenbach et al. 2010)

– Spatial autonomy vs. spatial restriction?

• Autonomous vs. controlled motivation (Self-determination theory, SDT; Deci & Ryan, 2000)

– Autonomous motivation occurs if people experience choice

– Controlled motivation pressure to act in a specific way

5

(Glass & Finley, 2002; Gajendran & Harrison, 2007)

theoretical background.

Page 6: Gerdenitsch eawop

How do Digital Natives experience temporal and spatial flexibility at their work?

In which temporal and spatial flexible situations, do they feel autonomously and/or controlled?

6

research question.

Page 7: Gerdenitsch eawop

• Mixed-method

Qualitative semi-structured interviews includingquantitative ratings

N = 45

27 ♂

22 – 31 years (M = 26.37, SD = 2.21)

7

method.

Page 8: Gerdenitsch eawop

Positive situations of temporal/spatial flexibility

8

results.

Categories Frequencies

Decision lattitude42 times(temporal 20, spatial 22)

Efficiency12 times(temporal 8, spatial 4)

Work non-workbalance

10 times(temporal 4, spatial 6)

Careerdevelopment

5 times(temporal 5, spatial 0)

“…gives me the freedom to determine the conditions of my working time including working longer or leaving earlier” (#41, male, 28 years, economics)

“I can impress my colleagues and my supervisor by being permanently available and accessible.” (#10, male, 27 years, economics)

Page 9: Gerdenitsch eawop

Negative situations of temporal/spatial flexibility

9

results.

Categories Frequencies

Workload18 times (temporal 9, spatial 9)

Work non-workconflict

14 times(temporal 7, spatial 7)

Disturbing workenvironment

10 times (temporal 0, spatial 10)

Accessibility10 times(temporal 10, spatial 0)

“.... it is much easier to work more, for example working additionally on the weekends.” (#4, male, 24 years, architecture)

„There is pressure to reply also during leisure time or vacation” (#44, female, 24 years, marketing)

Page 10: Gerdenitsch eawop

Positive situations: Role of Control

10

results.

**

*

decision latitude (t82 = 10.01, p = .000)efficiency (t22 = 3.40, p = .003) work non-work balance (t18 = 6.73, p = .000)career development (t8 = 1.265, p = .242)

Page 11: Gerdenitsch eawop

Negative situations: Role of Control

11

results.

workload (t34 = .251, p = .803)work non-work conflict (t28 = -1.028, p = .313) disturbing work environment (t18 = 1.741, p = .099) accessibility (t18 = .970, p = .345)

Page 12: Gerdenitsch eawop

Digital natives and flexible working

• Describe positve and negative aspects of flexible working arrangements for digital natives

– Career development

• Control: two-dimensions

– Autonomously

– Externally-controlled INTERNALIZATION (SDT)

• Introjection: people behave in a specific way to feel worthy

• Identification: behavior is congruent with one’s personal goals

• integration: an integrative part of who they are

12

discussion & conclusion.

Page 13: Gerdenitsch eawop

[email protected]

@cgerden

linkd.in/16c3KU3

bit.ly/18Nx1kD

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

13